IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION"

Transcription

1 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TOMEKA BARROW and ANTHONY * DIAZ, Individually and On Behalf of All * Others Similarly Situated, * * Plaintiffs, * * Civil Action File No. v. * * 1:16-cv AT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., * * Defendant. * * DECLARATION OF JASON A. IBEY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT I, JASON A. IBEY, declare: 1. I am an attorney admitted to the State Bar of California on November 26, 2012, and have been a member in good standing since that time. I am also admitted in every federal district in California and have handled federal litigation in the federal districts of California. I am also a member in good standing with the State Bar of Utah, since May 15, 2018.

2 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 7 2. I am a senior associate with the law firm, Kazerouni Law Group, APC, and co-counsel for the named Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action against defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( Defendant or JPMC ). 3. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called upon as a witness, could and would competently testify thereto, except as to those matters which are explicitly set forth as based upon my information and belief and, as to such matters, I am informed and believe that they are true and correct. 4. I have been preliminarily approved as one of Class Counsel in this matter. 5. I submit this declaration in support of the Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. 6. Prior to settlement, the Parties exchange written discovery and documentation. 7. Plaintiff Diaz obtained an audio recording through discovery where he believes that he clearly requested that JPMC stop calling him concerning the alleged home mortgage debt. 8. Following two mediations with experienced mediators, I took a confirmatory deposition pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). 9. I believe that the Parties are fully apprised of the relative strengths and weaknesses of each other s claims and defenses and the potential risks to 2

3 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 3 of 7 each party of pursuing further litigation in this matter, especially following two mediations. 10. There are an estimated 242,359 Settlement Class Members. a. It is my understanding, based on confirmatory discovery, that JPMC did not have telephone type data for approximately 71,350 phone numbers during the settlement class period; b. It is estimated that approximately half of the 71,350 phone numbers (35,675) were cell phone numbers as opposed to landline phone numbers, which was taken into consideration in the estimated Settlement Class Size of 242, I continue to be unaware of any conflict of interest between Plaintiffs and any settlement class member or between Plaintiffs and their attorneys. 12. I have assisted with the administration of the settlement through communicating with the Settlement Administrator, responding to dozens of inquiries, and assisting in drafting and reviewing important documents and motions. 13. I believe that Plaintiffs have continued to adequately represent the Settlement Class Members since preliminary approval was granted on March 16,

4 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 4 of Class Counsel have no reason to believe there are any present objections to the Settlement Agreement or motion for attorneys fees, costs and service awards. a. A letter dated July 6, 2018, was received by Class Counsel from Joshua and Tamera Sauter (the Sauters ), which included language of objection to the proposed settlement; b. After I personally reached out to the Sauters by to better understand the nature of the letter, which also included language of requesting exclusion, I learned that Sauters misunderstood the Release and nature of the proposed settlement; c. On August 1, 2018, the Sauters decided to participate in the settlement (they do not want to be excluded) and clarified by letter (transmitted to me via same day) that they do not have objection to the settlement; d. I agreed to file the August 1, 2018 letter with the Court on behalf of the Sauters; and, e. According to the Settlement Administrator, the Sauters submitted a claim form and a W9 form. 15. This settlement was negotiated without collusion by experienced and capable counsel on both sides. 4

5 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 5 of Plaintiffs and Class Counsel respectfully request that the Court approve claims regardless of whether a completed W9 form was provided, as long as the claim forms would otherwise be timely and valid. It is my understanding that JPMC does not oppose this request. 17. The Settlement Class Members were informed that Prosperity Now and New Media Rights was the Parties proposed cy pres beneficiaries of unclaimed settlement funds, through the detailed notice on the Settlement Website, located at In my opinion, based upon experience in litigating class actions under the TCPA, and the facts of this case, including the number of class members and other circumstances, I believe the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Therefore, I believe the settlement merits final Court approval. 19. Recently, I was preliminarily approved as one of class counsel in the following matters: (i) Couser v. Dish One Satellite, LLC, No. RIC , filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside; preliminary approval granted on October 3, 2018, in an alleged unlawful call recording action under California Penal Code 632.7; and (ii) Holt v. Noble House Hotels & Resort, Ltd., No. 17cv2246-MMA (BLM), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D.Cal. Oct. 16, 2018), in an action for alleged unlawful surcharge practices under California law. 5

6 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 6 of Since the filing of the fee petition on July 13, 2018, I have incurred over 31 hours working on this action to date. EXHIBITS 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of letter dated July 6, 2018 from Joshua and Tamera Sauter, received in the mail by Class Counsel. 24. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of letter signed on August 1, 2018 from Joshua and Tamera Sauter, which I received via from the Sauters on August 1, I informed the Sauters that I would file the letter with the Court on their behalf. 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a screenshot of the main page of the Settlement Website, taken on September 11, Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the detailed class notice posted on the Settlement Website. 27. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a placeholder page for the Administrator s declaration indicating timely requests for exclusion, in connection with motion to seal, entitled, Declaration of Lana Lucchesi Re: Timely Requests For Exclusion. 6

7 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 7 of 7 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on October 18, 2018 at St. George, Utah. By: s/ Jason A. Ibey JASON A. IBEY 7

8 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A

9 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2

10 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B

11 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2

12 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B

13 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 3 9/11/2018 Barrow et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Settlement Tomeka Barrow and Anthony Diaz ("Plainti s") v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMC" and together, with Plainti s, the "Parties"), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Barrow, et al. v 1/2

14 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 3 of 3 9/11/2018 Barrow et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Settlement 2/2

15 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT D

16 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 9 Tomeka Barrow and Anthony Diaz ( Plaintiffs ) v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( JPMC and together, with Plaintiffs, the Parties ), United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Case No. 1:16-cv AT If you received one or more autodialed or artificial or prerecorded calls on your cellular telephone from JPMC regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account between April 20, 2012 through March 16, 2018 and, prior to being called, you orally requested not to be called, you may be entitled to money under a class action settlement. A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A proposed settlement will provide $2,250,000 into a fund from which eligible persons who file claims will receive cash awards (the Settlement Fund ). The cash awards are estimated to be approximately $101 per claim, but this is only an estimate. The settlement fully resolves a lawsuit involving allegations that JPMC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the TCPA ) by placing telephone calls regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account to cellular telephones between April 20, 2012 through March 16, 2018 through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice message without express consent. You are in the Settlement Class if JPMC, or any affiliate or agent acting on its behalf, made one or more telephone calls to your cellular telephone through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice between April 20, 2012, through March 16, 2018, regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account and, prior to being called, you orally requested not to be called. A person who does not exclude him or herself is a Settlement Class Member. JPMC denies all allegations and denies any claim of wrongdoing. The Court has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiffs claims or JPMC s defenses. By entering into the settlement, JPMC has not conceded the truth or validity of any of the claims against it. The Settlement Fund will be used to pay all amounts related to the settlement, including settlement awards to Settlement Class Members, attorneys fees and costs to attorneys representing Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class ( Class Counsel ), any service awards to Plaintiffs, the costs of notice and administration of the settlement, and a possible charitable contribution if there are uncashed settlement award checks. Class Counsel will ask the Court for up to 30% of the Settlement Fund as fees and additional money up to $40,000 to reimburse them for the out-of-pocket expenses they paid to investigate the facts, litigate the case, and negotiate the settlement. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM. JPBNTW1

17 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 3 of 9 YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM AND W-9 FORM BY AUGUST 13, 2018 This is the only way to receive a payment. You will give up your rights to sue JPMC about the legal claims in this case. EXCLUDE YOURSELF BY AUGUST 13, 2018 Get no payment. This is the only option that allows you to ever sue JPMC on your own regarding the legal claims in this case. OBJECT BY AUGUST 13, 2018 Write to the Court about why you believe the settlement is unfair in any respect. Even if you file a valid and timely objection, you must still submit a claim form to receive a payment. ATTEND A HEARING ON NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. DO NOTHING Get no payment. Give up rights. These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the settlement. Settlement award payments will be made if the Court approves the settlement and after any appeals are resolved. Please be patient. BASIC INFORMATION 1. What is the purpose of this Notice? The purpose of this Notice is to inform you that a proposed settlement has been reached in the putative class action lawsuit entitled Barrow, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case No. 1:16-cv AT (N.D. Ga.). Because your rights may be affected by this settlement, it is extremely important that you read this Notice carefully. This Notice summarizes the settlement and your rights under it. 2. What does it mean if I received an or postcard about this settlement? If you received an or postcard describing this settlement, you may be a member of the Settlement Class. You are a member of the Settlement Class if JPMC, or any affiliate or agent acting on its behalf, made one or more telephone calls to your cellular telephone through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice between April 20, 2012, through March 16, 2018, regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account and, prior to being called, you orally requested not to be called. 3. What is this class action lawsuit about? In a class action, one or more people called a Class Representative (here, Plaintiffs) sues on behalf of people who allegedly have similar claims. This group is called a class and the persons included are called class members. One court resolves the issues for all of the class members, except for those who exclude themselves from the class. QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

18 Here, Plaintiffs claim JPMC violated the TCPA by placing calls, between April 20, 2012 through March 16, 2018, to cellular telephones, through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice without prior express consent. JPMC denies these allegations and denies any claim of wrongdoing. The Court has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiffs claims or JPMC s defenses. By entering into the settlement, JPMC has not conceded the truth or validity of any of the claims against it. The Court has conditionally certified a class action for settlement purposes only. Totenberg (the Court ) is presiding over this action. 4. Why is there a settlement? Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 4 of 9 The Honorable Amy The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiffs or JPMC. Instead, both sides agreed to this settlement. That way, they avoid the risk and cost of a trial, and the Settlement Class Members are eligible to receive compensation. Plaintiffs and Class Counsel think the settlement is best for all persons in the Settlement Class. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT CLASS? 5. How do I know if I am a part of the Settlement Class? The Court has certified a class action for settlement purposes only. You are in the Settlement Class if JPMC, or any affiliate or agent acting on its behalf, made one or more telephone calls to your cellular telephone through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice on between April 20, 2012, through March 16, 2018, regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account and, prior to being called, you orally requested not to be called. The Settlement Class does not include any persons who validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class, as described under Question 14. A person who does not exclude him or herself is a Settlement Class Member. If you are still not sure whether you are included in the Settlement Class, you can visit other sections of the Settlement Website, you may write to the Settlement Administrator at Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box , Louisville, KY , or you may call the Toll-Free Settlement Hotline, , and leave a voice message for the Settlement Administrator. 6. Do I have lawyers in this case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU The Court has appointed the law firms of Kazerouni Law Group, APC and Hyde & Swigart as Class Counsel to represent you and the other persons in the Settlement Class. You will not be personally charged by these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. Class Counsel may be reached at Barrow@westcoastlitigation.com. 7. How will Class Counsel and Plaintiffs be paid? Class Counsel will ask the Court to approve payment of up to $675,000 to them for attorneys fees. This amounts to 30% of the $2,250,000 Settlement Fund after notice expenses have been deducted. Class Counsel will also ask the Court to approve payment of their out-of-pocket expenses up to $40,000. This payment would pay Class Counsel for investigating the facts, litigating the case, and negotiating the settlement. JPMC reserves the right to oppose this request. Class Counsel also will ask the Court to approve payment of $5,000 to each to the two named Plaintiffs for their efforts in bringing the lawsuit and representing the Settlement Class. The Court may award less than these amounts. The fee petition will be available on the Settlement Website by July 14, QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

19 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 5 of 9 8. What does the settlement provide? THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS JPMC will pay $2,250,000 to cover the costs of settlement including: (1) cash awards to Settlement Class Members who submit a valid and timely claim form; (2) an award of attorneys fees to Class Counsel and Class Counsel s out-of-pocket expenses as approved by the Court; (3) service awards to the two named Plaintiffs, in an amount not to exceed $5,000 each, as approved by the Court; (4) the costs of notice and administration of the settlement; and (5) under certain circumstances as described below, a charitable contribution. No Portion of the Settlement Fund Will Return to JPMC. Any money remaining in the Settlement Fund after paying settlement awards to Settlement Class Members who submit valid and timely claim forms, attorneys fees and costs to Class Counsel, any service award to Plaintiffs, and the costs of notice and administration of the settlement, will be paid either: (1) in a second distribution to Settlement Class Members whose initial settlement awards were cashed; or (2) if there are not enough funds to justify a second distribution, the remaining funds will be donated to one or more charitable organizations. The Parties have proposed Prosperity Now and New Media Rights at the contingent cy pres beneficiaries, subject to Court approval. No portion of the Settlement Fund will return to JPMC. 9. How much will my settlement award be? Your share of the Settlement Fund will depend on the number of valid claim forms that Settlement Class Members submit. Class Counsel estimate that the amount of the settlement award, which is dependent upon the number of claims, to be approximately $101, but may be within the range of $101 (if 5% of the Settlement Class Members submit a claim) to $5 (if every estimated Settlement Class Member submits a claim). 10. What am I giving up to stay in the Settlement Class? Unless you exclude yourself from the settlement, you will be part of the Settlement Class, and you will be bound by the release of claims in the settlement. This means that, if the settlement is approved, you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against JPMC or any other released parties asserting a released claim. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. Unless you opt out of the settlement, you will agree to release JPMC and any other released parties from any and all claims that arise from the telemarketing calls at issue in this action. The release provides: Plaintiffs and each and all Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives, agents, attorneys, partners, successors, predecessors-in-interest, assigns, household members, and any persons acting on their behalf, will be deemed to have fully released and forever discharged JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and each and all of its and their present, former and future direct and indirect parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, agents, successors, and/or predecessors in interest and all of the aforementioneds respective officers, directors, employees, attorneys, shareholders, agents, vendors and assigns (together, the Released Parties ) from any and all rights, duties, obligations, claims, actions, causes of action or liabilities, whether arising under local, state or federal law, whether by Constitution, statute, contract, rule, regulation, any regulatory promulgation (including, but not limited to, any opinion or declaratory ruling), common law or equity, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, foreseen or unforeseen, actual or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, punitive or compensatory as of the date of Final Approval that arise out of or are related in any way to the actual or alleged use by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., or its current or prior representatives, agents or affiliates, of an artificial or prerecorded voice, predictive dialer and/or of any automatic telephone dialing system (to the fullest extent that those terms are used, defined or interpreted by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227, et seq., relevant regulatory or administrative promulgations and case law) to place calls to cellular telephones or any QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

20 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 6 of 9 telephones for which the called party is charged, including, but not limited to, claims under or for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227, et seq., and any other state or federal statutory or analogous common law claim (including, but not limited to, state laws and invasion of privacy) arising from the use of automatic telephone dialing systems, predictive dialer and/or an artificial or prerecorded voice (the Released Claims ) which have accrued on or before the date of Final Approval. Without limiting the foregoing, the Released Claims specifically extend to claims that Settlement Class Members do not know or suspect to exist in their favor at the time that the Settlement and the releases contained therein become effective. This Paragraph constitutes a waiver of, without limitation as to any other applicable law, Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members understand and acknowledge the significance of the waiver of California Civil Code Section 1542 and/or any other applicable federal or state statute, case law, rule or regulation relating to limitations on releases. In connection with such waivers and relinquishment, Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members acknowledge that they are aware that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to, or different from, those facts which they now know or believe to be true with respect to the subject matter of the settlement, but that it is their intention to release fully, finally and forever all Released Claims, and in furtherance of such intention, the release of the Released Claims will be and remain in effect notwithstanding the discovery or existence of any such additional or different facts. If you have any questions about the release or what it means, you can speak to Class Counsel, listed under Question 6, for free, or you can, at your own expense, talk to your own lawyer. The release does not apply to persons in the Settlement Class who timely exclude themselves. 11. How can I get a settlement award? HOW TO OBTAIN A SETTLEMENT AWARD To qualify for a settlement award, you must send in a claim form and a completed W-9 form by August 13, You may get a claim form and a W-9 form on the Settlement Website, or by calling the Toll-Free Settlement Hotline, Read the instructions carefully, fill out the claim form completely and accurately, sign it, and submit it. To be valid, the claim form must be completed fully and accurately and submitted timely, along with a completed W-9 form. A claim form and W-9 form may be submitted by mail to the Settlement Administrator at: Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box , Louisville, KY or via the Settlement Website. If you are submitting your claim and W-9 form via the Settlement Website, they must be submitted no later than August 13, If you are mailing your claim and W-9 form to the claims administrator, they must be postmarked by August 13, QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

21 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 7 of 9 WHEN WILL I RECEIVE MY SETTLEMENT AWARD? 12. When would I receive a settlement award? The Court will hold a Final Approval Hearing on November 1, 2018 to decide whether to approve the settlement. If the Court approves the settlement, after that, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. Everyone entitled to a settlement award will be informed of the progress of the settlement through information posted on the Settlement Website at Please be patient. 13. Will my settlement award expire? Yes. Settlement checks are only valid for 120 days after the date on the check. If you fail to cash the check within the 120-day time period, you will be deemed to have forever waived and released your claim for payment. Please act promptly. 14. How do I get out of the settlement? EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT If you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue JPMC or a Released Party arising out of a Released Claim, then you must take steps to get out of the Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourself from, or opting out of, the Settlement Class. You may request exclusion from the Settlement by submitting an opt-out request through the Settlement Website or by sending a written request to the Settlement Administrator. Exclusion requests must include: (1) the full name and address of the Settlement Class Member requesting exclusion; (2) any telephone numbers called by JPMC; (3) the following statement: I/we request to be excluded from the settlement in the Barrow action or a substantially similar statement that unambiguously communicates a desire to be excluded from the Settlement; and (4) for mailed opt-out requests, the Settlement Class Member s signature, and for opt-out requests submitted via the Settlement Website, the Settlement Class Member s electronic signature. Exclusion requests must be signed by the Settlement Class Member who is requesting exclusion. No request for exclusion will be valid unless timely submitted and all of the information described above is included. No Settlement Class Member, or any person acting on behalf of or in concert or participation with that Settlement Class Member, may exclude any other Settlement Class Member from the Settlement Class. If you are submitting your exclusion request via the Settlement Website, it must be submitted no later than August 13, If you are mailing your exclusion request to the Settlement Administrator, it must be postmarked by August 13, 2018 and mailed to the following address: Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Settlement Administrator P.O. Box Louisville, KY You cannot exclude yourself on the phone or by fax or . If you ask to be excluded, you will not get any payment, and you cannot object to the settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit. You may be able to sue (or continue to sue) JPMC or a Released Party in the future. 15. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue JPMC for the same thing later? No. If you do not exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue (or continue to sue) JPMC or any Released Parties for the Released Claims that this settlement resolves. If you already have a lawsuit that may relate to the claims being released as part of this class settlement, you should speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from this Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit. Remember, the exclusion deadline is August 13, QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

22 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 8 of If I exclude myself, can I get a benefit from this settlement? No. If you ask to be excluded, you will not receive a settlement award and you cannot object to the settlement. However, in the event a member of the Settlement Class submits both an exclusion request and a claim form, the claim form will control. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT 17. How do I tell the Court that I do not think the settlement is fair? If you are in the Settlement Class and do not exclude yourself, you can object to the settlement or any part of the settlement that you think the Court should reject, and the Court will consider your views. If you do not provide a timely, written objection in the manner described below, you are deemed to have waived any objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the settlement, including as to the award of any attorneys fees and costs to Class Counsel and/or service award to Plaintiffs. To object, you must make your objection in writing, stating that you object to the settlement in Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. You must make your objection in writing and file it with the Court. To be valid, the written objection must (1) contain information sufficient to allow the Parties to confirm that you are a Settlement Class Member; (2) include a statement of your specific objections; and (3) state the grounds for objection, as well as identify or attach any documents you would like the Court to consider. To be considered, you must file your objections with the Court at the address below and also mail your objections to Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counsel for JPMC at the addresses below no later than August 13, For Plaintiffs: Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Case No. 1:16-cv AT Clerk of the Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 75 Ted Turner Drive, SW Atlanta, GA For JPMC: KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC Abbas Kazerounian 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite D1 Costa Mesa, CA STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP Julia B. Strickland / Arjun Rao 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, CA What is the difference between objecting and excluding? Objecting is telling the Court that you do not like something about the settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself means that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you. If you both object and request to exclude yourself, the request to exclude yourself will control. 19. What happens if I do nothing at all? IF YOU DO NOTHING If you do nothing, you will not receive a settlement award and you will give up your rights to sue JPMC and/or any other Released Parties on a Released Claim. For more information relating to what rights you are giving up, see Question 10. QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

23 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 9 of 9 THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING 20. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the settlement? The Court will hold a Final Approval Hearing at 2:30 p.m. on November 1, 2018 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 75 Ted Turner Drive, SW, Atlanta, GA , in Courtroom rd Floor. At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. If there are valid objections that comply with the requirements in Question 17 above, the Court also will consider them and will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. The Court may also decide how much to pay to Class Counsel as well as Plaintiffs. The Final Approval Hearing may be moved to a different date or time without additional notice, so it is a good idea to check the Settlement Website for updates. 21. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Class Counsel will appear on behalf of the Settlement Class. But, you are welcome to come, or have your own lawyer appear, at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as your written objection was filed or mailed on time, and meets the other criteria described in the settlement agreement, the Court will consider it. 22. May I speak at the hearing? You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Final Approval Hearing, but only in connection with an objection that you have timely submitted to the Court according to the procedure set forth in Question 17 above. To speak at the Final Approval Hearing, you must also file a document with the Court stating your intention to appear. For this document to be considered, you must say that it is your Notice of Intention to Appear in Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case No. 1:16-cv AT. The document must also include your name, address, telephone number, that you are a Class Member, and your signature. The document must be filed with the Court at the address in Question 17 no later than August 13, You cannot speak at the hearing if you exclude yourself from the settlement. 23. How do I get more information? GETTING MORE INFORMATION This Notice is only a summary of the proposed settlement. More details are in the settlement agreement. You may get a copy of the settlement agreement by visiting the Settlement Website, or you may write to the address below or call the Toll-Free Settlement Hotline, , and leave a voice message for the Settlement Administrator. Class Counsel may be reached at Barrow@westcoastlitigation.com. PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE TO THE COURT, THE CLERK OF THE COURT, JPMC OR JPMC S COUNSEL ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT. Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Settlement Administrator P.O. Box Louisville, KY QUESTIONS? VISIT CALL AND LEAVE A MESSAGE, OR BARROW@WESTCOASTLITIGATION.COM

24 Case 1:16-cv AT Document Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT E Placeholder Page Only

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you have or had a residential purchase or refinance mortgage loan owned and/or serviced by Chase and Chase, directly or indirectly,

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California IF YOU RECEIVED A NON-EMERGENCY MORTGAGE OR CREDIT CARD DEFAULT SERVICING CALL OR TEXT ON YOUR CELLULAR TELEPHONE FROM BANK OF AMERICA

More information

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 3 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD

More information

This is the only way to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund. DO NOTHING

This is the only way to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund. DO NOTHING If you were called on a cellular telephone in the United States by M3 Financial, Inc. ( M3 ), using an automatic telephone dialing system or by an artificial or prerecorded voice message without your prior

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 74

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 74 Case 1:15-cv-01270-RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 74 Case 1:15-cv-01270-RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 8 of 74 Case 1:15-cv-01270-RWS Document 45-2 Filed 08/11/16 Page 9 of 74 Case 1:15-cv-01270-RWS

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If you received an automated call to your cell phone and were transferred to a State Farm Agent between January

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2)

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2) This Notice concerns a proposed class action settlement ( Settlement ) in a lawsuit entitled Edward J. Fangman, et al. v. Genuine

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL R. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP, Defendant. Case No. 2:13-cv-00767 MAGISTRATE JUDGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

Anticipated payment date: Ten (10) days after the Class Action Settlement becomes final and any appeals are exhausted.

Anticipated payment date: Ten (10) days after the Class Action Settlement becomes final and any appeals are exhausted. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING This Notice concerns a proposed class action settlement ( Class Action Settlement ) in a lawsuit entitled Palombaro v. Emery Federal

More information

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. United States District Court for the District of Minnesota IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA In Re: Monitronics International, Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation Case No. 1:13-md-02493 If you received telemarketing

More information

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES Authorized by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Stericycle, Inc. BASIC INFORMATION 1. What is this Notice about? A Court

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706 Case: 1:12-cv-05510 Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JONATHAN I. GEHRICH, ROBERT LUND,

More information

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 33 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 33 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 3:13-cv-03136-BAS-RBB Document 104-3 Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 33 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is entered into by Plaintiff Linda

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 1:15-cv-24326-CMA If you made a purchase at a Microsoft retail store using a credit card

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were sued by a National Collegiate Student Loan Trust and Patenaude & Felix, APC you could be entitled to benefits under a class

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information

Case 5:14-cv JPB-JES Document Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 4967

Case 5:14-cv JPB-JES Document Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 4967 Case 5:14-cv-00123-JPB-JES Document 302-1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 4967 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING DIVISION DIANA MEY, individually and on behalf

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you Incurred One or More $35 Extended Overdrawn Balance Charges in Connection with your BANK OF AMERICA personal checking account,

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

You Can Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement with CubeSmart

You Can Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement with CubeSmart This Notice Was Authorized by the United State District Court for the District of New Jersey You Can Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement with CubeSmart Steven Kendall v. CubeSmart L.P., et al.

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-jvs-rnb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 GAIL MEDEIROS, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, HSBC CARD SERVICES, INC. and HSBC TECHNOLOGY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you received a phone call on your cellular phone from, or on behalf of, Educational Financial Solutions, LLC d/b/a Campus Debt Solutions

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND COURT APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND COURT APPROVAL HEARING TO: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND COURT APPROVAL HEARING All persons in the United States who were the users or subscribers of a cellular telephone number to which the Defendants,

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IF YOU PURCHASED OR USED CLOROX AUTOMATIC TOILET BOWL CLEANER YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. A Federal

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. If you received treatment through a Swedish Health Services Emergency Department and were uninsured, you could be entitled to benefits under a class action settlement. The King County Superior Court authorized

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date: IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that HD Supply, Inc. ( HDS or Defendant ) sent marketing

More information

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099 Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 194-1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4099 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NEWPORT NEWS DIVISION FRANCIS W. HOOKER, JR., for himself

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY M. JORDAN, ELI GOLDHABER and JOSEPHINA GOLDHABER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 3:16-cv-00492-L-WVG Document 73 Filed 12/19/17 PageID.715 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFF M. OSTROW (admitted pro hac vice) KOPELOWITZ OSTROW

More information

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING UNSOLICITED FASCIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. United States District Court for the District of Columbia If You Received a Debit Card Issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for Your Service as a Juror or Fact Witness, You May Be Eligible for a Payment

More information

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV-14-061 Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you have received this notice, you could receive a settlement

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:16-cv-01915-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. PICK-A-PART AUTO

More information

A California Superior Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A California Superior Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN LUIS OBISPO If you were sent a collection letter from Allied Interstate between October 20, 2014 and October 20, 2015, you may be entitled to monetary compensation as part of a class

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, AEROPOSTALE, INC., THOMAS P. JOHNSON and MARC

More information

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018 Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court has authorized this notice. This

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» American Casino Recording Class Action c/o Dahl Administration LLC P.O Box 3614 Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 *«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» UNIQUE ID:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K

More information

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT A Willis v. iheartmedia, Inc., Case No. 2016 CH 02455 CLAIM FORM DEADLINE: THIS CLAIM FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED ONLINE OR POSTMARKED BY [28 days after the Final

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 192 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4078

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 192 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4078 Case 4:13-cv-00003-AWA-LRL Document 192 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 4078 FRANCIS W. HOOKER, Jr., for himself and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Rodriguez v. El Toro Medical Investors Settlement Administrator PO Box. 404041 ETZ «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: ETZ-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City»,

More information

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 2 of 80 PageID: 1051 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

More information

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANGELA FULLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case4:13-cv-02132-YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

Case 1:13-cv LMB-TCB Document 127 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID# 2647 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 1:13-cv LMB-TCB Document 127 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID# 2647 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 1:13-cv-01091-LMB-TCB Document 127 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID# 2647 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ) is entered into by and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

STATE OF MISSOURI, CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY

STATE OF MISSOURI, CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY If you purchased a property located in St. Louis County, Missouri, that was listed for sale by NRT Missouri LLC, and that had a two-story great room or two-story entry foyer, you could get a payment from

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Attention Purchasers of RUST-OLEUM Painter s Touch Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM Painter's Touch 2X Ultra Cover spray paint, RUST-OLEUM PaintPlus Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM American

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CACE-15-001612 (02) LYNN PHILLIPS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Brian J. Martin, Yahmi Nundley, and Katherine Cadeau, individually and on behalf Case No. 2:15-cv-12838 of all

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION FERNANDO MONROY and EDITH MONROY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CELESTICA INC. SEC. LITIG. : : : : : Civil Action No.: 07-CV-00312-GBD (ECF CASE) Hon. George B. Daniels NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are an individual who while residing in the United States between January 21, 2007 and October 15, 2009 owned a Harmony 1000

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION PAWEL I. KMIEC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION BARRETT v. FOREST SETTLEMENT c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 (866) 742-4955 ,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page]

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page] Case :-cv-00-wqh-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of F ISCHER AVENUE, UNIT D COSTA MESA, CA 0 Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. (SBN: ) ak@kazlg.com Jason A. Ibey, Esq. (SBN: 0) jason@kazlg.com Fischer Avenue,

More information

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing Walker v. Cutolo Law Firm, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County Docket No. MID-L-007498-11 This notice is

More information

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Settlement ) is entered into by and between Mark A. Arthur and Cirilo Martinez (together,

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Settlement ) is entered into by and between Mark A. Arthur and Cirilo Martinez (together, AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Amended Settlement Agreement (the Amended Agreement or the Amended Settlement ) is entered into by and between Mark A. Arthur and Cirilo Martinez (together, Arthur Plaintiffs

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA WILD RIDES INTERNET CAFE, LLC, and CLIMATE MASTERS HEATING & COOLING, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, WASTE INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendant. Case No.: 17 CV 756-1

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ), effective as of the date of the last signature below, is made by and between Plaintiff Jonathan Weisberg

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT If you purchased a NIVEA Good-Bye Cellulite or My Silhouette! Product, between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2012 you could get a payment from a class action settlement. (A state court authorized this notice.

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY IF YOU ARE A WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENT WHO ENTERED INTO A DEBT SETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH DEBT AID PROCESSING, INC., YOU COULD BE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT FROM

More information

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If Bottling Group, LLC, Grayhawk Leasing, LLC, or New Bern Transport Co (individually and collectively,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil

More information

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 9 of 156 Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 259-1 Filed 06/17/16 Page 10 of 156

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv-20549-KMW SEARCHMEDIA HOLDINGS LTD.,

More information