IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
|
|
- Duane Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 81R/01 In chambers: Gildenhuys AJ MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 8448/2001 Decided on: 06 September 2001 In the review proceedings in the case between: T J M MULLER t/a T J MULLER & SON Applicant and CLAASSEN, W LAWS, R CARELSE, P First Respondent Second Respondent Third Respondent JUDGMENT GILDENHUYS AJ: [1] The papers in the case were forwarded to the Registrar of this Court under cover of a letter dated 26 July 2001, reading as follows: Alle oorspronklike hofstukke tov bogenoemde saak word hiermee aan u versend vir u dringende aandag en oorweging. Stuur alle dokumente soos aangeheg saam met u aanbeveling na hierdie kantoor terug.
2 2 I do not know if it was intended to submit the case for automatic review in terms of section 19(3) of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 1 ( the Act ). Because the Act is clearly applicable, the eviction order is subject to review. 2 [2] The applicant in the case applied by way of notice of motion in the Magistrate s Court, George for an order against the respondents as follows: a) The Respondents must vacate the premises at MILKWOOD FARM, GEELHOUTBOOM, DISTRICT GEORGE, within a period as decided by the Court; b) That the sheriff be authorized to remove the Respondents together with their possessions from the property should the Respondents not vacate the premises as ordered by the Court; c) That the Respondents be ordered to pay the Applicant s costs for the bringing of this Application. [3] The applicant s founding affidavit contains the following statements: None of the Respondents have ever received the right from myself or anybody else to live on the farm. They moved into a dwelling with one of my former worker s widow without my consent.... The only person who has got my consent to live in the house at this stage, is Katriena Claasen, the widow of my late farm worker. I have however also given her notice to vacate the premises as prescribed by the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (as amended). The First Respondent is Katriena Claassen s son. I am uncertain about what the relationship between her and the Second and Third Respondents are. She has however never requested my permission to have other people living with her in the house. 1 Act 62 of 1997, as amended. Section 19(3) of the Act reads as follows: (3) Any order for eviction by a magistrate's court in terms of this Act, in respect of proceedings instituted on or before a date to be determined by the Minister and published in the Gazette, shall be subject to automatic review by the Land Claims Court, which may- (a) confirm such order in whole or in part; (b) set aside such order in whole or in part; (c) (d) substitute such order in whole or in part; or remit the case to the magistrate's court with directions to deal with any matter in such manner as the Land Claims Court may think fit. 2 Skhosana and Others v Roos t/a Roos se Oord and Others reported as Skhosana v Roos 2000 (4) SA 561 (LCC); [1999] 2 All SA 652 (LCC) at para [18]; Bergboerdery v Makgoro 2000 (4) SA 575 (LCC) at paras [4]- [7].
3 [4] On 27 June 2001 the Additional Magistrate, George, gave the following order: 3 die aansoek van die applikant word toegestaan met koste. Respondente word beveel om die perseel te verlaat voor of op 31 Julie It is not clear whether the order was made in terms of the provisions of the Act. If it was, it did not comply with section 12(1)(b) of the Act. 3 [5] It is clear that Katriena Claassen, with whom the respondents live, is an occupier as defined in the Act. 4 Until she is evicted by order of Court, she is entitled to family life in accordance with the culture of her family. 5 Generally speaking this means that she is entitled to have members of her family living with her. The three respondents in this case are people staying with her. They are probably family members. The procedures set out in the Act must be followed before family members can be evicted. [6] I have come to the conclusion that the requirements for an eviction order in terms of the Act have not been met in several respects. I confine myself to one of them, being the requirement of giving advance notice of the intended eviction, as required by section 9(2)(d). The section reads: (2) A court may make an order for the eviction of an occupier if-... (d) the owner or person in charge has, after the termination of the right of residence, given- (i) (ii) the occupier; the municipality in whose area of jurisdiction the land in question is situated; and 3 Section 12(1) reads as follows: (1) A court that orders the eviction of an occupier shall- (a) determine a just and equitable date on which the occupier shall vacate the land; and (b) determine the date on which an eviction order may be carried out if the occupier has not vacated the land on the date contemplated in paragraph (a). 4 See the definition of occupier in section 1 of the Act. 5 Section 6(2)(d) of the Act, which reads: (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of section 5 and subsection (1), and balanced with the rights of the owner or person in charge, an occupier shall have the right-... (d) to family life in accordance with the culture of that family...
4 4 (iii) the head of the relevant provincial office of the Department of Land Affairs, for information purposes, not less than two calendar months' written notice of the intention to obtain an order for eviction, which notice shall contain the prescribed particulars and set out the grounds on which the eviction is based: Provided that if a notice of application to a court has, after the termination of the right of residence, been given to the occupier, the municipality and the head of the relevant provincial office of the Department of Land Affairs not less than two months before the date of the commencement of the hearing of the application, this paragraph shall be deemed to have been complied with. [7] The founding affidavit does not deal with the requirements of section 9(2)(d). Amongst the papers, however, are copies of two section 9(2)(d)(i) notices, addressed to second and third respondents respectively, and served on them by the sheriff on 7 February The form of a section 9(2)(d)(i) notice is prescribed by regulations. 6 It must correspond with Form E of the regulations. Form E requires that a separate notice must be served on every occupier in the household, excluding children under the age of As I read that, it requires service of a separate notice on every persons forming part of the household. [8] The first respondent is the son of Katriena Claassen. As such it would appear that his residence with his mother might be in terms of section 6(2)(d) of the Act. If this is so, he cannot be evicted without proper grounds. 8 There is no evidence that a section 9(2)(d)(i) notice was ever served on him. The section 9(2)(d)(ii) and (iii) notices served on the municipality and on the Department of Land Affairs do not refer to the first respondent. The eviction order granted against him was, if only for these reasons, made contrary to the requirements of the Act. It cannot be allowed to stand. [9] The applicant, in his founding affidavit, alleged that he is uncertain about what the relationships between Katriena Claassen and the second and third respondents are. If the applicant was uncertain about the relationships, he should have enquired. The return of service of the section 9(2)(d)(i) notice on the third respondent by the sheriff, describes Katriena Claassen as the grandmother of the third 6 The regulations are published in Regulation R1632, Government Gazette 19587, 18 December I have assumed that all three respondents are over the age of 18, since each has been cited as a respondent in his own right. 8 Conradie v Hanekom and Another 1999 (4) SA 491 (LCC); [1999] 2 All SA 525 (LCC) at para [21]; Remhoogte Farms (Pty) Ltd v Mentoor, LCC 71R/99, 2 December 1999, [1999] JOL 5851 (LCC); website at para [7].
5 5 respondent. Failing allegations from the applicant as to the nature of the relationships between Katriena Claassen and the second and third respondents, I cannot assume that they are not family members. 9 [10] The section 9(2)(d)(i) notices served on the second and third respondents are curious. They contain the statement: U het... nooit enige reg gevestig om op die grond te woon nie. A few lines lower down a contrary statement appears: U verblyfreg is in terme van Artikel 8 van die Wet op die Uitbreiding van Sekerheid van Verblyfreg beëindig. In the notices, according to the last statement, the existence of a verblyfreg (albeit now cancelled) and also the applicability of the Act are accepted by the applicant. [11] Katriena Claassen might well be entitled, under section 6(2)(d) of the Act, to have the second and third respondents living with her. The applicant must either present proper grounds why he would be entitled to evict them separately from Katriena Claassen, which he did not do, 10 or he must apply for their eviction together with the eviction of Katriena Claassen. The eviction orders against the second and third respondents should not have been granted on the papers as they now stand. [12] The notice of motion commencing the proceedings was, according to returns of service amongst the papers, served on second and third respondents on 7 May There is no evidence of service on the first respondent. Furthermore, the date of hearing is stated at several places in the notice as 10 May At one of these places the date was altered by hand to 5 June At other places, the date remained unaltered. That is sufficiently confusing to make the entire notice defective. The order 9 Karabo and Others v Kok and Others 1998 (4) SA 1014 (LCC); [1998] 3 All SA 625 (LCC) at para [13]; De Kock v Juggels and Another 1999 (4) SA 43 (LCC) at para [13]. 10 The mere allegation of a notice given to Katriena Claassen to vacate the land cannot, on its own, constitute sufficient grounds. It could well be that the other requirements of the Act have not been met and that Katriena Claassen will not be not obliged to leave.
6 6 was eventually given on 27 June There is no explanation as to how the case become to be heard on that date. There is also no indication of whether the respondents were present at the hearing. [13] I must make one final remark. The eviction order was granted on 27 June The respondents were ordered to leave the farm on 31 July The letter under cover of which the papers were sent to the Registrar was dated 26 July 2001, almost a month after the order was made. I do not know when it was posted. It arrived at the Registrar s office on 15 August The delay is unexplained, and unacceptable. Order [14] The order of the Magistrate given on 27 June 2001 is set aside in whole. The applicant s attorney is requested to take such steps as he or she may deem appropriate to bring this fact to the attention of the respondents. ACTING JUDGE A GILDENHUYS For the applicant: Millers Incorporated, George. For the respondents: Unknown.
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 21R/00 In chambers: DODSON J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 6753/98 Decided on: 02 May 2000 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 48R/00 In chambers: DODSON J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 3001/2000 Decided on: 27 July 2000 In the review proceedings in the case
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 15R/04 In chambers: MOLOTO J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 95/02 Decided on: 3 March 2004 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationESTERHUYZE v KHAMADI 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) Flynote : Sleutelwoorde. Headnote : Kopnota
ESTERHUYZE v KHAMADI 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) 2001 (1) SA p1024 Citation 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) Case No LCC 48R/00 Court Land Claims Court Judge Dodson J Heard July 27, 2000 Judgment July 27, 2000 Annotations
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 38R/02 In chambers: MOLOTO AJ MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 18577/01 Decided on: 27 May 2002 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG CASE NUMBER : 23/98 In the matter between : NEW ADVENTURE INVESTMENTS 19 (PTY) LTD MERCIA GLUTZ First Applicant Second Applicant amd BETCHI JOSEPH
More informationReproduced by Data Dynamics in terms of Government Printers' Copyright Authority No dated 24 September 1993
2 No. 417 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 2 AUGUST 17 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from existing enactments. Words underlined with a solid line indicate insertions
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 82R/02 In chambers: Gildenhuys AJ MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 1214/2001 Decided on: 29 August 2002 In the review proceedings in the
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG CASE NUMBER : LCC9R/98 In the matter concerning M P DU TOIT Plaintiff and LEWAK LE KAY alias LEWAK LANGTREY Defendant JUDGMENT MOLOTO J : [1] The
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Heard at CAROLINA on 4 March 2002 CASE NUMBER: LCC 115/99 Before: Gildenhuys AJ Decided on: 15 March 2002 In the case between: COMBRINCK, H J Plaintiff and NHLAPO,
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held in Chambers on 23 June 2006 Before Ncube AJ CASE NUMBER: LCC71R-06 Decided on: 26 June 2006 In the matter between : UMOBA FARMS (PTY) LTD Applicant and GANTSHO
More information2 No GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2010 Act No, 5 of 2010 SOCIAL ASSISTANCE AMENDMENT ACT GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: Words in bold type
Vol. 543 Cape Town, 16 September2010 No. 33562 Kaapstad, THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 830 16 September 2010 Nr. 830 16 September 2010 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the
More information[PROVINCIAL NOTICE NO. 7 OF 017] SUPPLEMENTARY VALUATION ROLL (017/018) Notice is hereby given in accordance with Chapter of the Municipal Systems Act
Provincial Gazette Free State Province Provinsiale Koerant Provinsie Vrystaat Published by Authority Uitgegee op Gesag NO.11 FRIDAY, 09 FEBRUARY 018 NR.11 VRYDAG, 09 FEBRUARIE 018 PROVINCIAL NOTICES PROVINSIALE
More informationJUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) Case No: 20900/08 In the matter between: ROSSO SPORT AUTO CC Applicant and VIGLIETTI MOTORS (PTY) LTD Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at DURBAN on 31 October 2001 CASE NUMBER: LCC 40/01 Before: Gildenhuys AJ Decided on: 7 November 2001 In the interlocutory application of E M MDUNGE AND OTHERS
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. LESLIE MILDENHALL TROLLIP t/a PROPERTY SOLUTIONS. HANCKE, J et FISCHER, AJ
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between:- Appeal No. : A297/10 JOHANNES STEPHANUS LATEGAN MARLET LATEGAN First Appellant Second Appellant and LESLIE MILDENHALL
More informationIs s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 finally tailored? Prof Francois du Toit. FISA Conference. September 2012
Is s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 finally tailored? Prof Francois du Toit FISA Conference September 2012 John H Langbein, Substantial compliance with the Wills Act 1975 Harvard Law Review 489 498: What
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRCA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRCA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE 400/07 In the matter between: POTCH ACTION GROUP First Applicant AFRIFORUM Second Applicant and THE MEC FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT First
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
CA 301/2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: MICHELE COLAVITA APPLICANT AND SAMSTOCK PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES (PTY LIMITED RESPONDENT JUDGMENT FOR
More information2016 SEPTEMBER 16 CASE No 802/2015
1 S v DW NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY KGOMO JP and MAMOSEBO J 2016 SEPTEMBER 16 CASE No 802/2015 Mamosebo J (Kgomo JP concurring): [1] This is a special review in terms of s 304A of the Criminal Procedure
More informationMALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between: MALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI Case No.: A199/2009 1 st Appellant 2 nd Appellant and KHATSE EVELYN
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 41R/99 In Chambers: DODSON J MAGISTRATE COURT CASE NUMBER: 2109/98 In the review proceedings in the case between: R V FERGUSON Plaintiff
More informationINFORMATION DOCUMENT ON HOW TO DEAL WITH UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND
INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON HOW TO DEAL WITH UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND 1. INTRODUCTION For purposes of this document, a clear distinction must be made between unlawful access to property and squatting in
More informationUITSPRAAK IN DIE NOORD GAUTENG HOE HOF PRETORIA (REPUBL1EK VAN SUID-AFRIKA) ) seres SAAKNOMMER: 38798/2006. In die saak tussen: Applikant
IN DIE NOORD GAUTENG HOE HOF PRETORIA (REPUBL1EK VAN SUID-AFRIKA) In die saak tussen: VERONICA KRETSCHMER SAAKNOMMER: 38798/2006 Applikant en 3ROLL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (EDMS) 3PK (REGISTRASIENOMMER 199S/C15132/07)
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CARLLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the review between: Review No. : 4860/07 CARLLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO Plaintiff and CARRLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO (SNR) RACHEL MAGDALENA GAGIANO THERESA
More informationVAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J. [1] The accused was charged with housebreaking with intent to. commit an offence unknown to the prosecutor.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the review between:- THE STATE versus OTHNIEL SELLO MAIEANE Review No. : 92/2008 CORAM: VAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J JUDGMENT BY:
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) PETER MOHLABA. and WINSTON NKOPODI JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: Case No.: Civil Appeal 3/2003 PETER MOHLABA and WINSTON NKOPODI JUDGMENT HENDRICKS AJ: INTRODUCTION This is
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. JOHN BUTI MATLADI on behalf of the MATLADI FAMILY
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 42/13 [2013] ZACC 21 In the matter between: JOHN BUTI MATLADI on behalf of the MATLADI FAMILY Applicant and GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY ANGLORAND HOLDINGS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO. (3) REVISED. DATE SIGNATURE CASE
More informationINFORMATION DOCUMENT ON HOW TO DEAL WITH UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND
INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON HOW TO DEAL WITH UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND 1. INTRODUCTION For purposes of this document, a clear distinction must be made between unlawful access to property and squatting in
More informationGOVERNMENT G - AZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA. I No September 1998 No September 1998
GOVERNMENT G - AZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Registered at the Post Ojice as a Newspaper As n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer b CAPE TOWN, 28 SEPTEMBER 1998 VOL. 399 No.
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT ECJ no: PARTIES: ROAD ACCIDENT FUND v CORNEL FORBES REFERENCE NUMBERS Registrar: CA 197/05 Magistrate: Supreme Court of appeal/constitutional Court: EASTERN
More informationCAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Vivier Adcj, Howie JA and Brand AJA
CAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Citation Case No 495/99 Court Judge 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Supreme Court of Appeal Heard August 28, 2001 Vivier
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH
AFRICA IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH Held at RANDBURG on 20 22 January 2003 CASE NUMBER: LCC 42/02 Before: BAM P and GILDENHUYS J Decided on: 8 April 2003 In the case between: NHLABATHI, MV NHLABATHI,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH_AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION)
239/85/AV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH_AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: IASA MOOSA and MOHAMED SAYED CASSIM Appellants AND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Respondent CORAM: JANSEN, HOEXTER,GROSSKOPF,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPORTABLE Case number: 105/2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. ABSA BANK LIMITED t/a VOLKSKAS BANK
In the matter between: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA REPORTABLE Case number: 105/2000 ABSA BANK LIMITED t/a VOLKSKAS BANK APPELLANT and JAN HENDRIK NEL PAGE HENDRIK VAN NIEKERK NO FIRST
More informationHIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between:- Case Number : 99/2014 THE STATE and RETHABILE NTSHONYANE THABANG NTSHONYANE CORAM: DAFFUE, J et MURRAY, AJ JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CHRISTOPHER EDWARD MARTIN DAMON FOR THE APPLICANT : ADV.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) REPORTABLE Case No: 1601/09 In the matter between: CHRISTOPHER EDWARD MARTIN DAMON Applicant and SAHRON DAMON BFP ATTORNEYS THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY
Reportable: Yes / No Circulate to Judges: Yes / No Circulate to Magistrates: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY In the matter between: CASE NO: 1960/2010 HEARD:
More informationLAND RESTITUTION AND REFORM LAWS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LAND RESTITUTION AND REFORM LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly as a section 7 Bill) (MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND LAND AFFAIRS) [B 9 99] REPUBLIEK VAN
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Please note that most Acts are published in English and another South African official language. Currently we only have capacity to publish the English versions. This means that this document will only
More information\zloshoii - m-the matteruetwee
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DELETE W ^ j ^ GXl/l^NG r P HlGH COURT, PRETORIA) (1) REPORTABLE: y^sjno. I (2J OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: ]0HO. CASE NO: 50122/2008 ' (3) REVISED. n.*# J A \zloshoii
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 1 APRIL 2010 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received
Regulation Gazette 9252 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 538 Pretoria, 1 April 2010 33068 2 33068 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 1 APRIL 2010 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 104/2011 Reportable In the matter between: CITY OF CAPE TOWN APPELLANT and MARCEL MOUZAKIS STRÜMPHER RESPONDENT Neutral citation: City of Cape
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at PORT ELIZABETH CASE NUMBER : LCC35/97 THE FARMERFIELD COMMUNAL PROPERTY TRUST Claimant concerning: THE REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION 7 OF THE FARM KLIPHEUVEL
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 96/15 SOPHY MOLUSI DAVID MAMONGALO ISAAC SELOLWANE K L THWARISANG JOSEPH RAMOKANE FRANS MOKANSI First Applicant Second Applicant Third
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the review between:- THE STATE and SIFISO ALFRED TSHABALALA Review No. : 278/2011 CORAM: MOLEMELA, J et KUBUSHI, AJ DELIVERED ON: 1 SEPTEMBER
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN
Page 1 of 14 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN In the matter between: NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS APPLICANT and BLACK MOUNTAIN A DIVISION OF ANGLO OPERATIONS LIMITED RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT
More informationBuffalo City Metropolitan Municipality JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION Case nos: EL270/17; ECD970/17 Date heard: 22/6/17 Date delivered: 28/6/17 Not reportable In the matter between: David Barker Applicant
More informationJORDAAN NO AND ANOTHER v VERWEY 2002 (1) SA 643 (E) 2002 (1) SA p643. Citation 2002 (1) SA 643 (E) Case No CA 271/2000. Court Eastern Cape Division
JORDAAN NO AND ANOTHER v VERWEY 2002 (1) SA 643 (E) 2002 (1) SA p643 Citation 2002 (1) SA 643 (E) Case No CA 271/2000 Court Eastern Cape Division Judge Erasmus J and Sandi AJ Heard March 26, 2001 Judgment
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
r THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Not Reportable Case No: 267/13 WILLEM PHEIFFER and CORNELIUS JOHANNES VAN WYK AAGJE VAN WYK MARDE (PTY) LTD MARIUS EKSTEEN
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN K.-\.-\ No. 18964 I THE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT J u n e I GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from
More informationMZOXOLO MABHUTI ZENZILE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN REPORTABLE Before the Hon Mr Justice NJ Yekiso In the matter between: THE STATE Case No: SS106/08 and MZOXOLO MABHUTI ZENZILE Accused
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG on 20 April 1999 before Gildenhuys J and Bam P CASE NUMBER: LCC50/99 In the case of JOHANNES SKHOSANA SOPHIE MALULEKA ABRAM SELLO SAMUEL CHAUKE
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 580 Pretoria, 17 October Oktober 2013 No. 36942 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible
More informationBUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationPROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT 3 OF 2000
Page 1 of 13 PROMOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT 3 OF 2000 [ASSENTED TO 3 FEBRUARY 2000] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 NOVEMBER 2000] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CASE NO. 179/84 /ccc IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between SHADRACK MORE APPELLANT AND MINISTER OF CO-OPERATION & DEVELOPMENT FIRST RESPONDENT J DE VILLIERS SECOND
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 576/11 Reportable In the matter between:- RADITSHEGO GODFREY MASHILO MINISTER OF POLICE FIRST APPELLANT SECOND APPELLANT and JACOBUS MICHAEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between: LEON BOSMAN N.O. IZAK
More informationLL Case No 247/1989 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION. In the matter between: and. VAN HEERDEN, SMALBERGER JJA et PREISS AJA
LL Case No 247/1989 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION In the matter between: THOMAS MAMITSA Appellant and JULIUS MOSES KHUMALO Respondent CORAM: VAN HEERDEN, SMALBERGER JJA et PREISS
More information10]JUDGMENT: DELIVERED 16 AUGUST 2002
3] 1]IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 2](CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) 3]Case No A962/01 In the matter between: 5]THE BOARD FOR SHERIFFS First Appellant 6]THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No.: 1116/2006. In the case between: ALL GOOD THINGS 149 CC.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the case between: Case No.: 1116/2006 ALL GOOD THINGS 149 CC Plaintiff and WASCON SIVIEL CC WOUTER WASSERMAN 2 nd Defendant
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 179/16 MAMAHULE COMMUNAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION MAMAHULE COMMUNITY MAMAHULE TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY OCCUPIERS OF THE FARM KALKFONTEIN First
More informationRules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA. Act. Published under. GN R1448 in GG of 10 October as amended by
Rules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA Act Published under GN R1448 in GG 25515 of 10 October 2003 as amended by GN R1512 in GG 25607 of 17 October 2003 GN R1748 of 2003 in GG 25797 of 5
More informationSTAATSKOERANT GOVERNMENT GAZETTE
LtfdVdl'f Please note that most Acts are published in English and another South African official language. Currently we only have capacity to publish the English versions. This means that this document
More informationCOSTA LIVANOS t/a LIVANOS BROTHERS ELECTRICAL
50/91 N v H ATTERIDGEVILLE TOWN COUNCIL AND ANOTHER versus COSTA LIVANOS t/a LIVANOS BROTHERS ELECTRICAL SMALBERGER, JA :- 50/91 N v H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG. V. V. A. Applicant. V. T. L. Respondent DATE OF HEARING : 05 SEPTEMBER 2015
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG HIGH COURT (LOCAL DIVISION JOHANNESBURG)
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG HIGH COURT (LOCAL DIVISION JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO:30023/2013 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED 29 OCTOBER 2014 Signature: T MOSIKATSANA
More informationFor GPW business and processing rules relating to publishing of notices in this gazette, please refer to page 2. NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
For GPW business and processing rules relating to publishing of notices in this gazette, please refer to page 2. NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE PROFENSI YA KAPA-BOKONE NOORD-KAAP PROVINSIE IPHONDO LOMNTLA KOLONI
More informationFor GPW business and processing rules relating to publishing of notices in this gazette, please refer to page 2. NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
For GPW business and processing rules relating to publishing of notices in this gazette, please refer to page 2. NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE PROFENSI YA KAPA-BOKONE NOORD-KAAP PROVINSIE IPHONDO LOMNTLA KOLONI
More informationProvincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant
THE PROVINCE OF GAUTENG G A U T E N G PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT UNITY IN DIVERSITY DIE PROVINSIE GAUTENG Provincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 18 PRETORIA, 21 AUGUST AUGUSTUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Case No.: A183/2013 DANNY MEKGOE Applicant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: DAFFUE, J et NAIDOO, J JUDGMENT BY:
More information~~~fe OFFICIAL GA OFFISIELE KOERANT. Goewermentskennisgewing. Government Notice. EXTRAORDINARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA. BUITENGEWONE - INHOUD CONTENTS
., OFFICIAL GA EXTRAORDINARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA. e.~ ~ BUITENGEWONE - ~~~fe OFFISIELE KOERANT PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY. UITGAWE OP GESAG. VAN SUIDWES-AFRIKA. 10c Thursday, SO March, 1967 WINDHOEK Donderdag,
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held in Vryheid on 1-3 September 2003; 3-5 May 2004 before Moloto J Decided on : 20 May 2004 CASE NUMBER: LCC23/02 In the matter between: HENDRIK CAREL GERHARDUS
More informationAIDS HEIRINE Prevention is the cure. We oil hawm he power to preftvent klldc EXTRAORDINARY BUITENGEWONE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE PROFENSI YA KAPA-BOKONE NOORD-KAAP PROVINSIE IPHONDO LOMNTLA KOLONI EXTRAORDINARY BUITENGEWONE Provincial Gazette Kasete ya Profensi igazethi YePhondo Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 20
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
In the matter between: THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 503/94 IH GLYNN RUDOLPH GLYNN RUDOLPH & CO (PTY) LIMITED First Appellant Second Appellant v THE COMMISSIONER FOR INLAND REVENUE
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J1982/2013 In the matter between: NUMSA obo MEMBERS Applicant And MURRAY AND ROBERTS PROJECTS First
More informationLEBOGANG GODFREY MOGOPODI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the case between: Case No.: 122/2008 LEBOGANG GODFREY MOGOPODI Applicant and THE MEMBE OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF THE FREE
More informationProvincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant
The Province of Gauteng UNITY IN DIVERSITY Die Provinsie Van Gauteng Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant EXTRAORDINARY BUITENGEWOON Selling price Verkoopprys: R2.50 Other countries Buitelands: R3.25
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE NO: 395/04 In the matter between: THE CITY OF CAPE TOWN Applicant and STACEY YAWA AND OTHERS First to Eighteenth Respondents
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) DELETE WHICHUVL:?! it; (D F. .(2; Or INTEREST TO O (3) REVISED.
(S//2/2CD/O IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) Case No: 11213A/2009 DELETE WHICHUVL:?! it; NO In the matter between: (D F.(2; Or INTEREST TO O (3) REVISED. : if W GREEN-CHEM
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 83 Cape Town, Kaapstad, 22 January 14 No. 372 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 39 22 January 14 No. 39 22 Januarie
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No.: 3001/2005. In the case between: PIETER BADENHORST SCOTT.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No.: 3001/2005 In the case between: PIETER BADENHORST SCOTT Applicant and MARIA CATHARINA HOUGH Respondent HEARD ON: 15 JULY
More information[1] These three cases came to us on automatic review. The. accused were separately arrested and charged. They appeared
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the review between:- THE STATE versus Review No. : 575/08 Review No. : 721/08 Review No. : 761/08 DINEO ANNAH VAN WYK MORAKE
More informationEXTENSION OF SECURITY OF TENURE AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA EXTENSION OF SECURITY OF TENURE AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 39232
More informationPREVENTION OF ILLEGAL EVICTION FROM AND UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND ACT 19 OF 1998
PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL EVICTION FROM AND UNLAWFUL OCCUPATION OF LAND ACT 19 OF 1998 [ASSENTED TO 2 JUNE 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 5 JUNE 1998] (English text signed by the President) ACT To provide for
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG on 25 October 1999 before Gildenhuys J, Goldblatt (assessor) Decided on: 30 November 1999 CASE NUMBER: LCC116/98 In the case of: THE FORMER HIGHLANDS
More informationApplicant ELIT (SA) (PTY) LTD. and. First Respondent STANLEY CHESTER PHEKANI N.0. Second Respondent STANLEY CHESTER PHEKANI
' IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: 24535/2017 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE In the matter between: - ELIT (SA) (PTY) LTD Applicant and STANLEY CHESTER
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10548 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 607 14 January Januarie 2016 No. 39595 N.B. The Government Printing
More informationNONTSAPO GETRUDE BANGANI THE LAND REFORM THE REGIONAL LAND CLAIMS COMMISSION FULL BENCH APPEAL JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) APPEAL CASE NO. CA25/2016 Reportable Yes / No In the matter between: NONTSAPO GETRUDE BANGANI Appellant and THE MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
More informationOFFICIAL GAZETTE. Government Notice. Goewermentskennisgewing VAN SUIDWES-AFRIKA EXTRAORDINARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA BUITENGEWONE OFFISIELE KOERANT
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OFFICIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA BUITENGEWONE OFFISIELE KOERANT VAN SUIDWES-AFRIKA UITGAWE OP GESAG R0,60 Wednesday 18 December 1985 WINDHOEK Woensdag 18 Desember
More information2 No PROVINCE OF THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 9 JUNE 2011 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held
I ::;:;: :::~; ::::; {: :;::: f: :::;: ;:,:; :;:: ::} ;::::: :;::::. ::} ::::::' lill!ilill!~~ 1111:1 llllllli llil~:; III::.. ::::::,1111 ~11111:~1 1.1:: ;':;: ;::::: ):::; ::::: :,::,,,;;, ;} iii:::::::::
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO. CA&R 53/2013 REPORTABLE JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO. CA&R 53/2013 REPORTABLE In the matter between: SIPHO ALPHA KONDLO Appellant and EASTERN CAPE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Respondent JUDGMENT
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Vol. 426 Cape Town 21 April 09 No. 32148 THE PRESIDENCY No. 434 21 April 09 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act, which
More information/SG IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION. In the matter between: FAIROAKS INVESTMENT HOLDI GS (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION Date: 02/02/2007 Case no: 9858/2005 UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: FAIROAKS INVESTMENT HOLDI GS (PTY) LTD WILLOW FALLS ESTATE Case no:
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at Randburg on 30 and 31 Oct 2000 CASE NUMBER: LCC 116/99 before Moloto AJ Decided on: 27 December 2000 In the matter between: MAHLANGU, NH NO Applicant and
More information