Iowa Fence Law. January 2008 Revised: July 3, by Roger A. McEowen*
|
|
- Barrie Carter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Iowa Fence Law 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa January 2008 Revised: July 3, by Roger A. McEowen* Overview Issues involving partition fences are the cause of many disputes between Iowa landowners. Partition fences mark property boundaries between adjacent landowners. Iowa has numerous statutes which govern fencing matters. This article addresses the major areas of contention. Where Is a Fence to Be Built? A partition fence is to be built on the property line between adjacent tracts of land. 1 This rule applies to both agricultural land and land within a city. Because Iowa has a specific statute addressing partition fence location, a local ordinance requiring fences to be located any place other than on the property line is unenforceable. 2 Is there a Duty to Erect and Maintain Fences? In Iowa, with one exception, 3 a landowner does not have a legal duty to build a partition fence. However, a landowner can be compelled to contribute to the creation or maintenance of a partition fence upon the written request of an adjacent owner. 4 A landowner can also be compelled to build or maintain a partition fence on the basis of an agreement such as utilization of the right-hand rule. That s an informal arrangement by which the landowners face one another at the mid-point of the fence and agree to maintain their share of the fence to their respective right-hand sides. For a written fence agreement that details the allocation of fence maintenance and/or construction, two options exist: (1) adjacent owners can enter into a written agreement, or (2) adjacent owners can request an order from the fence-viewers (township trustees) allocating responsibility between the parties. The use of a written fence agreement worked out by adjacent owners is often overlooked, but Iowa law does allow owners of adjoining parcels to file an agreement with the county recorder of deeds to make an agreement binding. 5 Such an agreement, upon recordation, is binding upon the original parties, their heirs and subsequent owners. If adjacent owners cannot come to a mutual agreement, however, the township trustees (acting in their capacity as fence viewers) can be called upon to settle the dispute. State law specifically authorizes township trustees, acting as fence viewers 6, to decide partition fence controversies and render opinions that will be binding upon current and subsequent owners. 7 The Fence Dispute Resolution Process If the statutory process for resolving fence disputes is invoked, a four-step process is involved: Step 1 - the complaining landowner must make a written request to the other landowner for the erection of a fence. Step 2 - if Step 1 does not resolve the matter, the complaining landowner must make a formal 1
2 request to the township trustees to resolve the dispute. 8 Step 3 - the trustees must give five days written notice to all adjoining landowners that are liable for the erection or maintenance of the partition fence concerning time and place of the hearing. 9 Step 4 - the fence viewers meet and issue a written order that allocates responsibility for maintenance or erection of the partition fence. 10 The fence viewers are to divide responsibility for building and maintaining partition fences equally between the parties regardless of which party gains primary benefit from the fence construction. 11 As mentioned above, the decision of the fence viewers is binding. However, a landowner can appeal to the local district court by filing a notice of appeal within 20 days after the fence viewers render their decision, and filing an appeal bond. 12 Generally, the court sets the amount of appeal bond at the trustees' estimated cost of fence repair. Absent an appeal, landowners must construct or maintain their assigned portion of fence as decided by the fence viewers. If a party fails to comply with the decision of the fence viewers within 30 days, 13 disaffected landowners can request that the fence viewers build or maintain the fence. But, the party (or parties) requesting the fence viewers to do so must pay a deposit to cover the fence building expense, which will be reimbursed upon collection from the party in default. 14 When the fence work is completed, the landowner in default will have ten days to make the required payments. If payment is not made, the amount will be assessed as property taxes on the disputed property. 15 What kind of fence can be required? Iowa law generally requires the erection of a legal fence. Several options qualify as legal fence under Iowa law: rails, boards, high-tensile wire or most commonly three barbed wires. 16 If a landowner pastures sheep or swine, a fence can also be required to be tight. 17 A tight fence requires the landowner to add woven wires to the partition fence to restrain sheep and swine. 18 When a request is 2 made by an adjacent landowner for a tight fence, the wire must be securely fastened to good and substantial posts and set firmly in the ground, not more than 20 feet apart. 19 Acceptable materials for a lawful fence are: o Three rails of good substantial material fastened in or to good substantial posts not more than 10 feet apart o Three boards not less than 6 inches wide and ¾ s in. thick, fastened in or to good substantial posts not more than 8 ft. apart. o Three barbed wires with not less than 36 iron barbs of two points each, or 26 iron barbs of 4 points each, on each rod of wire, or of 4 wires, 2 thus barbed and 2 smooth. Wires are to be firmly fastened to posts not more than 2 rods apart, with not less than 2 stays between posts, or with posts not more than one rod apart without such stays, the top wire no more than 54 nor less than 48 in. in height. o Wire whole of in part: lowest board, rail or wire not more than 20 nor less than 16 in. from the ground, and top rail, wire, or board to be between 48 in. and 54 in. in height and middle rail, wire, or board not less than 12 nor more than 18 in. above bottom rail, wire, or board. o High-tensile wire: 4 parallel, coated steel, smooth high-tensile wire meeting requirements of ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) International. Wire must be firmly fasted to plastic, metal, or wooden posts securely planted in the earth. The posts shall not be more than 2 rods apart. The top wire shall be at least 40 in. in height. o Any other kind of fence which the fence viewers consider to be equivalent to a lawful fence or which meets standards established by IDALS by rule as equivalent to a lawful fence (currently these standards do not exist). Partition fences and livestock owners Iowa is a common-law, fence-in jurisdiction. This means that a farmer has a responsibility to fence in their own livestock. Iowa does, however, follow a conditional fence- out theory. Thus, if an animal escapes as a consequence of negligent fence maintenance by adjacent landowners, the
3 neighboring landowner will not able to recover damages to their property by the trespassing animal. 20 Essentially, Iowa places a duty on the non-livestock owner to maintain their portion of the fence and limits the overall reach of the fence-in theory. As noted above, adjacent landowners are equally responsible for building and maintaining partition fences. Livestock owners must fence and control animals under their care. A livestock owner is liable for the damages caused by their trespassing animals if the trespass is caused by the owner s negligence. 21 The concept of distraint may also come into play. Distraint allows a person to take possession of trespassing livestock until the costs of distraint (e.g., the cost of keeping and caring for the livestock and any damages that they caused) are paid. 22 A livestock owner may also be liable for damages to third parties, such as motorists who suffer harm from trespassing animals. In Iowa, a common law duty exists to prevent animals from entering a public roadway despite the fact the formal fence-in statute was repealed in As a result, a livestock owner has a duty of ordinary care to prevent injuries and is liable to the extent that injuries were reasonable foreseeable. For example, in a 2004 Iowa Supreme Court opinion, a ranch failed to inspect the fence and take precautions necessary to protect motorists from stray horses. 24 The ranch argued that the statutory repeal of the fence-in requirement relived them of this responsibility. 25 The Court disagreed, and noted that the common law imposed a duty of reasonable care upon livestock owners to restrain livestock. 26 Adjacent landowners also may bear liability for livestock if a trespass results from negligent maintenance of partition fence. 27 If a legal duty to construct a fence does not exist, adjacent landowners will not incur liability. 28 When a legal duty to maintain legal fence exists from a written agreement or order of the fence viewers, negligence by an adjacent landowner can lead to liability for damage to third parties. 29 If both parties, however, fail to maintain a fence and a third party is injured, negligence will be a jury question. In lease situations, Iowa courts have held that landlords bear no responsibility for damage caused by a tenant s livestock Under Iowa law, a habitual trespass occurs when livestock escape their enclosure at least three times in a 12-month period and trespass onto the same neighboring landowner or the same public road each time. 31 In that event, the local government may (either on its own initiative or upon receipt of a complaint) make a finding as to whether a habitual trespass has occurred. If so, the disaffected neighboring landowner can make written request of the livestock owner that the livestock owner build a fence. If such a fence is not built within 30 days of receiving the request, the matter can be submitted to the fence viewers. The neighboring landowner is not liable for building or maintaining the fence unless the neighboring landowner is an adjacent landowner. Non-navigable waters and fencing Iowa has adopted what is known as the common law rule for non-navigable waters. 32 A nonnavigable body of water is typically a landlocked body that could not serve as a water passageway for moving commerce. The common law rule recognizes that owners of a lake bed own the property from the bottom of the lake to the sky. 33 This rule recognizes property boundaries and protects owner s rights to control that portion of the water the landowner possesses. Because of this, owners may fence off the portion of the water source they possess for their exclusive use and enjoyment. Of course, nothing requires owners to build a fence to encompass the boundaries of the water area owned. Likewise, many owners may choose to bargain for and adopt mutually acceptable arrangements for the use and enjoyment of the water body by all littoral landowners. What if a fence has been improperly located? If it is discovered that a fence has been improperly located, but it has been treated as the boundary by the adjacent owners, there may be a strong interest in allowing the fence to remain in its current position. Iowa law recognizes this fact and allows a misplaced fence to continue to serve as the legal boundary between adjacent landowners irrespective of what a subsequent survey may indicate is the actual true boundary. In Iowa, once a fence has been utilized as the boundary for a period of 10 years, the fence can establish the boundary even though a later survey indicates the fence is not
4 on the surveyed line. 34 This concept is known as a boundary by acquiescence. The adjacent owners didn t know where the true property line was, but simply acquiesced in the existing fence line as the actual boundary by either farming or grazing cattle up to the fence. Once a court determines that, based on the evidence, the fence has been treated as a boundary for 10 years, the fence becomes the true boundary. 35 A similar concept is where a misplaced fence can become the true boundary via a prescriptive easement (by prescription). A prescriptive easement can arise when the adjacent owners know where the true boundary is, know that the existing fence is not on the line, but continue to use the fence as the property line. In that situation, one of the adjacent owners is actually allowing the other adjacent owner to use some of their property that they wouldn t otherwise be able to use if the fence were in the correct location. The party that is benefitting from the misplaced fence can establish a prescriptive easement by showing that they have openly and notoriously possessed the land, adversely under a claim of right, and have had continuous and exclusive use for the statutory period (10 years). 36 Open and notorious possession requires that a landowner have used the property in a similar as fashion as the true owner, which is established by acts such as improving or maintaining the land. 37 That possession be adverse and under a claim means that the landowner has made an innocent mistake in locating the boundary and had believed that the fence was on the proper location when erected. 38 Continuous use for the statutory period requires that a landowner s use has not interrupted by another party for the statutory period 10 years. 39 Exclusive use by the landowner claiming the easement is not required, as mere casual intrusion by others on the property does not invalidate the continuity required for a prescriptive easement to be established. 40 If these elements are established, the fence will continue to serve as the border between landowners as a result of a prescriptive easement. Constitutional issues In recent years, the constitutionality of requiring a landowner to erect and maintain partition fencing 4 has been questioned. As the trend towards a more urban society continues, the validity of fencing statutes will likely be challenged on a more frequent basis. Some states have formally taken the position that compelling a property owner that does not own livestock to contribute to the erection or maintenance of a fence is unconstitutional (on Fifth Amendment grounds as a taking of private property without just compensation ). 41 However, Iowa has not taken this view. 42 The Iowa Supreme Court has held it constitutional to require landowners to share in the expense of creating a partition fence. In a 1995 case, an urban resident complained that requiring contribution for a fence which provided him no benefit was unconstitutional. But, the Court disagreed, noting that Iowa is an agricultural state, and that the burden on the non-livestock owner was minimal. Conclusion The old maxim remains true Good fences make good neighbors. So, to avoid fencing disputes, the best practice is to maintain communication with neighbors. But it is also helpful to have an understanding of the basic principles of Iowa fence law. It is also helpful to remember that many potential conflicts can be resolved in advance through written fence agreements between the parties. If that approach doesn t work, the fence viewers can be called upon to make a decision. Regardless of which method is used, it is apparent that fences will continue to aid the agricultural interests of Iowa for the foreseeable future. *Leonard Dolezal Professor in Agricultural Law, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, and Director of the ISU Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation. Member of the Iowa and Kansas Bar Associations and licensed to practice in Nebraska. 1 IOWA CODE 359A.16 (2011). 2 See, e.g., Gravert v. Nebergall, 539 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1995)(local home rule does not pre-empt a specific state statute relating to fences; agricultural land immaterial). 3 See IOWA CODE 169C.6 (2011). 4 IOWA CODE 359A.1A (2011). 5 IOWA CODE 359A.13 (2011). 6 IOWA CODE (2011). 7 IOWA CODE 359A.3 (2011). 8 Id.. 9 Id. 10 IOWA CODE 359.A4 (2011).
5 11 See Duncalf v. Ritscher Farms, Inc., 627 N.W.2d 906 (Iowa 2001). 12 IOWA CODE 359A.23 (2011). 13 The parties must complete the fence work within the timeframe established by the fence viewers in their decision. Default occurs if a responsible party does not complete assigned work within 30 days of the completion date established by the fence viewers. 14 IOWA CODE 359A.4 (2011). 15 IOWA CODE 359A.6 (2011). 16 IOWA CODE 359A.18 (2011). 17 IOWA CODE 359A.21 (2011). 18 IOWA CODE 359A.20 (2011). 19 IOWA CODE 359A.19 (2011). 20 Noble v. Chase, 60 Iowa 261, 14 N.W. 299 (1882). 21 IOWA CODE 169C.4 (2011). 22 IOWA CODE 169.C1 (2011). 23 See, e.g., Klobnak v. Wildwood Hills, Inc., 688 N.W.2d 799 (Iowa 2004). 24 Id. 25 Id. 26 Id. 27 Mossman v. Amana Society, 494 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 1993). 28 Jacobs v. Stover, 243 N.W.2d 642 (Iowa 1976). 29 See, e.g., Mossman v. Amana Society, 494 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 1993)(railroad liable for negligent care of fence, which lead calf to escape and injure motorist). 30 Byers v. Evans, 436 N.W.2d 654 (Iowa Ct. App. 1988)(landlord had no duty to exercise control over fences constructed by tenant). 31 IOWA CODE 169C.6 (2011). 32 Orr v. Mortvedt, 735 N.W.2d 610, 618 (Iowa 2007). 33 A minority of states have adopted the civil law rule, which provides that owners of any portion of a nonnavigable lake are entitled to reasonable use and enjoyment of the entire surface of the lake. 34 IOWA CODE (2011). 35 IOWA CODE See also Heer v. Thola, 613 N.W.2d 558 (Iowa 2000) (establishment of title via acquiescence occurs upon court finding that particular boundary has been acquiesced in for statutory period); Lucas v. Forrester, No / , 2007 Iowa App. LEXIS 192 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2007)(same); Feldmann v. Ostwinkle, No , 2006 Iowa App. LEXIS 196 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 1, 2006) (same); Post v. Barnette, No / , 2007 Iowa App. LEXIS 1219 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2007) (plaintiff failed to establish by clear evidence the location of a definite line required to find a boundary pursuant to Iowa Code ). 36 IOWA CODE (2011). 37 See, e.g., Johnson v. Kaster, 637 N.W.2d 174, 179 (Iowa 2001). 38 Collins Trust v. Alamakee County Bd. of Supervisors, 599 N.W.2d 460 (Iowa 1999). 39 IOWA CODE (2011). 40 Johnson v. Kaster, 637 N.W.2d 174 (Iowa 2001). 41 Choquette v. Perrault, 153 Vt. 45, 589 A.2d 455 (1989)(requiring non-livestock owners to build and maintain fences constituted a compensable taking under the Fifth Amendment). 42 Gravert v. Nebergall, 539 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1995). 5
Iowa Fence Requirements: A Legal Review By Kristine A. Tidgren i July 27, 2016
Iowa Fence Requirements: A Legal Review By Kristine A. Tidgren i July 27, 2016 Background Iowa fence law has long sought to protect agricultural interests. Iowa fencing statutes date from earliest times,
More informationSurface Water Drainage Dispute Raises Numerous Issues
Surface Water Drainage Dispute Raises Numerous Issues 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu July 17, 2009 - by Roger McEowen Overview Surface water drainage disputes can arise
More informationFences -- Legal Enclosures -- Enclosure of Domestic Animals
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL February 16, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 87-28 The Honorable Joseph F. Norvell State Senator, 37th District State Capitol, Room 452-E Topeka, Kansas 66612 Re: Fences
More informationUniversity of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Illinois
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Illinois www.nationalaglawcenter.org States Fence Laws STATE OF ILLNOIS 510 Ill. Comp. Stat.
More informationFENCE LAWS III FEB ~ 8 15 AGR1CULIUBE L'~ C' RGULll.l;~S COPY~ Circular 733 UNIV~RSITY OF ILLINOIS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
III C' RGULll.l;~S COPY~ AGR1CULIUBE L'~ FENCE LAWS FEB ~ 8 15 By H. W. Hannah I 'l'''''i=~qty OF RHODE ISLAND LIBRARY' Circular 733 UNIV~RSITY OF ILLINOIS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE EXTENSION SERVICE IN AGRICULTURE
More informationA PROCEDURAL GUIDE FOR TOWNSHIPS
OHIO PARTITION FENCE LAW A PROCEDURAL GUIDE FOR TOWNSHIPS S E P T E M B E R 2 0 0 8 P R O V I D E D B Y O H I O T O W N S H I P A S S O C I A T I O N O S U E X T E N S I O N A G R I C U L T U R A L & R
More informationFences and Detention of Stray Livestock Act
Fences and Detention of Stray Livestock Act CHAPTER 166 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 2002, c. 1, ss. 9-18; 2016, c. 20, ss. 1-5 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova
More informationAn Overview of Virginia Fence Law. Jason Carter, Extension Agent, Augusta County
An Overview of Virginia Fence Law Jason Carter, Extension Agent, Augusta County Disclaimer The information presented in this presentation about Virginia Fence Law and legislation is meant to be for educational
More informationUniversity of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Kentucky
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Kentucky www.nationalaglawcenter.org States Fence Laws STATE OF KENTUCKY Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann.
More informationUniversity of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Michigan
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Michigan www.nationalaglawcenter.org States Fence Laws STATE OF MICHIGAN Mich. Comp. Laws
More informationUniversity of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Arizona
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Arizona www.nationalaglawcenter.org States Fence Laws STATE OF ARIZONA Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann.
More informationThe Stray Animals Regulations
1 The Stray Animals Regulations Repealed by Chapter S-60 Reg 1 (effective June 9, 1999) Formerly Saskatchewan Regulations 304/77 (effective November 1, 1977). NOTE: This consolidation is not official.
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MILTON BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MILTON BY-LAW NO. 97-2005 BEING A BY-LAW TO DETERMINE HOW THE COST OF DIVISION FENCES SHALL BE APPORTIONED, AND TO REPEAL BY-LAW NO. 100-2003 WHEREAS Section 11(2) of the
More informationOFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 119-05 Passed by Council on November 28, 2005 Amendments: By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended 55-07 April 23, 2007 Delete Private Swimming Pool Definition
More informationIdaho Open Range Law. ICA Annual Meeting
Idaho Open Range Law ICA Annual Meeting Bill Myers 1 November 15, 2016 1. Generally. In Idaho, livestock areas outside of cities and villages fall into two categories open range and herd districts. Open
More informationARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance
ARTICLE F Fences Ordinance SEC. 10-6-60 FENCES. (a) Fences. Fences are a permitted accessory use in any district and may be erected provided that the fence is maintained in good repair, that the finished
More informationFENCING/SCREENING/LANDSCAPING
FENCING/SCREENING/LANDSCAPING Sec. 117-1127. Fences. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for the installation of fences and protect the public's health, safety, and general welfare.
More informationProvince of Alberta LINE FENCE ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-13. Current as of December 13, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LINE FENCE ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-13 Current as of December 13, 2016 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor,
More informationMissouri s Complex. Looking at Missouri s 2 Fence Laws. Disclaimer. Where Missouri is at right now... Local Option Law Counties
Cedar Webster County Cattle Producers Meeting -- Marshfield, MO 7/9/2015 Missouri s Complex Fence Law Looking at Missouri s 2 Fence Laws Presented by: Bob Schultheis Natural Resource Engineering Specialist
More informationIndexed. -to W. HANNAH Circular 977. tv of Illinois College of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service
CIRCULATING COpy AGRICULIURE LI.BHARJ' Indexed -to W. HANNAH Circular 977 tv of Illinois College of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service CONTENTS GENERAL FENCE LAWS...................................
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PENETANGUISHENE BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PENETANGUISHENE BY-LAW NUMBER 2009-42 BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE ENCLOSURES AROUND PRIVATELY OWNED OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOLS (POOL FENCE BY-LAW) WHEREAS pursuant to section
More informationMissouri s Complex Fence Law
Missouri s Complex Fence Law Presented by: Joe Koenen Agriculture Business Specialist and County Program Director Program Complaint Information To file a program complaint you may contact any of the following:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS WILBERT WHEAT, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 5, 2004 v No. 242932 Wayne Circuit Court STEGER HORTON, LC No. 99-932353-CZ Defendant-Appellant. Before: Schuette,
More informationCITY OF KINGSTON. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Regulate Fences. By-Law Number: Date Passed: September 9, 2014
CITY OF KINGSTON Ontario By-Law Number 2003-405 A By-Law To Regulate Fences Passed: November 4, 2003 As Amended By By-Law Number: By-Law Number: Date Passed: 2014-140 September 9, 2014 (Office Consolidation)
More informationUniversity of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. An Agricultural Law Research Project. States Fence Laws. State of Virginia
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Virginia www.nationalaglawcenter.org States Fence Laws STATE OF VIRGINIA VA. Code Ann. 33.1-202
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURY BY-LAW A By-law to Prescribe the Height and Type of Fences
THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURY BY-LAW 120-16 A By-law to Prescribe the Height and Type of Fences WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.O., 2001, C. 25, S. 11 a Council may pass a by-law respecting
More informationSENATE, No. 463 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 209th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2000 SESSION
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY 0th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 000 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator ROBERT W. SINGER District 0 (Burlington, Monmouth and Ocean) SYNOPSIS Prohibits use of
More informationOffice Consolidation of By-Law
The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-Law 2011-045 Being a by-law to provide for the apportionment of costs of Division Fences Passed, by Council, on: April 11, 2011 Consolidated as of:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 6, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 6, 2009 Session JOHN C. POLOS v. RALPH SHIELDS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Blount County No. 2003-137 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor
More informationFences. Call Gopher State One at to identify utility locations prior to digging post holes.
City Of Austin 500 Fourth Avenue N.E. Austin, Minnesota 55912-3773 Zoning Department 507-437-9950 Fax 507-437-7101 Permits: All fences erected within Austin city limits require a zoning permit. This permit
More informationAREA SERVICE SYSTEM LEVEL B ROAD CLASSIFICATION
TITLE II - TRANSPORTATION AREA SERVICE SYSTEM LEVEL B ROAD CLASSIFICATION IN 14.01 Purpose 14.07 Maintenance Policy 14.02 Definitions 14.08 Other Maintenance 14.03 Powers of the Board 14.09 Exemption from
More information2016 VT 21. No On Appeal from v. Superior Court, Bennington Unit, Civil Division. Susan Wielt and Brian Toomey March Term, 2015
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INNISFIL BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INNISFIL BY-LAW NO. 052-05 A By-law of the Corporation of the Town of Innisfil prescribing the heights and descriptions of lawful fences in the Town of Innisfil and for the
More information- CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 14 - PLANNING ARTICLE II. - RESIDENTIAL FENCE REGULATIONS
Sec. 14-21. - Short title. Sec. 14-22. - Definitions. Sec. 14-23. - Purpose. Sec. 14-24. - Scope. Sec. 14-25. - Permit requirements. Sec. 14-26. - Fence types, dimensions and specifications. Sec. 14-27.
More informationGood Fences Make Good Neighbors
Good Fences Make Good Neighbors A Comparison of Livestock Containment Laws in Wyoming, Colorado and Montana Wyoming State Bar Annual Meeting September 16, 2016 Amy Mowry https://s media cache ak0.pinimg.com/736x/0d/b6/f6/0db6f6c7afe04414b059889bb102001d.jpg
More informationFence By-law. PS-6 Consolidated May 14, As Amended by: PS March 20, 2012 PS May 14, 2013
Fence By-law PS-6 Consolidated May 14, 2013 As Amended by: By-law No. Date Passed at Council PS-6-12001 March 20, 2012 PS-6-13002 May 14, 2013 This by-law is printed under and by authority of the Council
More informationFENCE PERMIT APPLICATION
36725 Division Road P.O. Box 457 Richmond MI 48062 (586) 727-7571 ext. 202 (586) 727-2489 fax FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION Property Address: Parcel Number: Oct. 2015 APPLICATION FOR FENCE CITY OF RICHMOND
More informationAGRICULTURAL LAW General Practice Review, Drake University Law School December 8, 2017
AGRICULTURAL LAW 2017 General Practice Review, Drake University Law School December 8, 2017 Eldon McAfee Erin Herbold-Swalwell Julia Vyskocil Brick Gentry, P.C. 6701 Westown Pkwy, Suite 100, West Des Moines,
More informationEmbassy Park Architectural Control Committee, ACC. Memo on fencing procedures and requirements
Embassy Park Architectural Control Committee, ACC Memo on fencing procedures and requirements Due to the high number of inquiries on fencing requirements and request, the following memo of understanding
More informationPENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NUMBER HOLDING TANKS
PENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NUMBER 2001-2 HOLDING TANKS SECTION 1. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for and regulate the use, maintenance and removal of new and existing
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 15, 2002 v No. 232374 Wayne Circuit Court WILLIAM TILTON, LC No. 00-000573-NO Defendant-Appellee. Before: Fitzgerald,
More informationBY-LAW NUMBER of - THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT. To regulate yard maintenance
BY-LAW NUMBER 97-17 - of - THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT To regulate yard maintenance WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the County of Brant is desirous of enacting a bylaw to regulate
More informationBE it enacted by the Administrator of British New Guinea with
THE TRESPASS AND BRANDS ORDINANCE OF 1891. (1) No. 4 of 1891. An Ordinance to deal with Trespass by Animals and to Provide for the Registration of Cattle Brands and Animals. BE it enacted by the Administrator
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND BY-LAW NUMBER BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAWFUL FENCES
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND BY-LAW NUMBER 2002-09 BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAWFUL FENCES WHEREAS paragraphs 25, 26, 27 and 28 of Section 210 of the Municipal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt Wilke,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-983 / 10-0895 Filed February 9, 2011 GEORGIA PACIFIC GYPSUM, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. NEW NGC, INC. d/b/a NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Judge.
More informationHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Fence Construction Guidelines
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Fence Construction Guidelines May 29, 2012 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Dear Whispering Hills Homeowner, Thank you for your willingness to abide by the fencing guidelines of the Whispering
More informationCHAPTER III ANIMALS. Part 1. Animal Nuisances
CHAPTER III ANIMALS Part 1 Animal Nuisances Section 101. Intent and Purpose Section 102. Definitions Section 103. Exceptions Section 104. Running at Large Prohibited Section 105. Duty to Secure Animal
More informationIowa s Recreational Use Immunity - Now You See It, Now You Don t
Iowa s Recreational Use Immunity - Now You See It, Now You Don t 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu March 6, 2012 Updated February 15, 2013 and January 17, 2014 - by Erika
More informationCITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT
CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT February 2016 23200 Gratiot, Eastpointe, MI 48021 - Building Department -- 586-445-3661 A FENCE PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS IT MEETS
More informationREGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE
REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PERMITS Article 1. General Provisions Section 3-101 Definitions Section 3-102 Applicable Requirements Article 2. Village Building Permits
More informationNUISANCE (PRIVATE) ENGLAND AND WALES
Legal Topic Note LTN 67 October 2014 NUISANCE (PRIVATE) ENGLAND AND WALES The Civil wrong (tort) of Private Nuisance 1. This Legal Topic Note deals with the subject of private nuisance. A separate Legal
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JULY 29, 2016; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-001413-DG WILLIAM P. HUFFMAN APPELLANT ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM CARTER CIRCUIT COURT v.
More informationCONSOLIDATED WITH BY-LAW THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MULMUR BY-LAW NO FENCE BY-LAW
CONSOLIDATED WITH BY-LAW 17-2013 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MULMUR BY-LAW NO. 14-2006 FENCE BY-LAW WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, s. 8, provides that a Municipality has the capacity,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHN DRUMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 22, 2005 v No. 252223 Oakland Circuit Court BIRMINGHAM PLACE, d/b/a PAUL H. LC No. 2003-047021-NO JOHNSON, INC., and
More informationWHERE DOES THIS APPLY? After the effective date of this Ordinance, it shall apply to all of the unincorporated areas within Iowa County.
FACT SHEET IOWA COUNTY, WISCONSIN ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE AND NUTRIENT UTILIZATION ORDINANCE PURPOSE To regulate the location, design, construction, installation, alteration, closure and the use of animal
More informationCompiler's note: The repealed sections pertained to definitions and soil erosion and sedimentation control program.
NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (EXCERPT) Act 451 of 1994 PART 91 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 324.9101 Definitions; A to W. Sec. 9101. (1) "Agricultural practices" means all
More informationv No Grand Traverse Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S DEBORAH ZERAFA and RICHARD ZERAFA, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellants, UNPUBLISHED October 9, 2018 v No. 339409 Grand Traverse Circuit Court
More informationHALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER C-700 BY- LAW RESPECTING MUNICIPAL CEMETERIES
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER C-700 BY- LAW RESPECTING MUNICIPAL CEMETERIES BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the Halifax Regional Municipality as follows: Short Title 1 This by-law shall be
More informationOFFICIAL ORDINANCE SOO LINE TRAIL RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS PINE COUNTY, MN
OFFICIAL ORDINANCE SOO LINE TRAIL RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS PINE COUNTY, MN AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF THE ABANDONED SOO LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PINE COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
More informationCity CQ)f WesiwCQ)Jrth Village 31]1 Bm ' ~o:n JHljl1 IRo 'Il '~ VVest-wodh Village, T :g: ]Pax ll7.7jlo.2501
City CQ)f WesiwCQ)Jrth Village 31]1 Bm ' ~o:n JHljl1 IRo 'Il '~ VVest-wodh Village, T :g: 76114 817.710.2500 ]Pax ll7.7jlo.2501 ORDINANCE NO. 423 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WESTWORTH VILLAGE AMENDING
More informationBY-LAWS RELATING TO FENCES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1960 CITY OF MELVILLE BY-LAWS RELATING TO FENCES IN pursuance of the powers conferred upon it by the abovementioned Act and of other powers enabling it, the Council of the above mentioned
More informationLocal Law relating to Fences
Local Law relating to Fences Extract from Government Gazette (No.15) of 15 February, 1985 City of Melville Amendments to the Local Laws Relating to Fences In pursuance of the powers conferred upon it by
More informationHANDOUT FOR MULMUR TOWNSHIP RATEPAYERS SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES May 01, 2013
HANDOUT FOR MULMUR TOWNSHIP RATEPAYERS SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES May 01, 2013 Council has established rules for fencing swimming pools that meet (and in some ways exceed) the minimum requirements of the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: August 29, 2012 Docket No. 29,853 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF BERNALILLO, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, IVAN
More informationLEGAL LIABILITY FOR TREES 26 TH ANNUAL RELEAF CONFERENCE JULY 27, 2018
LEGAL LIABILITY FOR TREES 26 TH ANNUAL RELEAF CONFERENCE JULY 27, 2018 Laura E. Ayers, Esq. 186 Delevan Road Delanson, New York 12053 (518) 895-1115 laura@lauraayerslaw.com Landowners Liability For Tree
More information(3) "Conservation district" means a conservation district authorized under part 93.
PART 91, SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1994 PA 451, AS AMENDED (Includes all amendments through 8-1-05) 324.9101 Definitions; A to W.
More informationCHAPTER 2 ANIMALS PART 1 PROHIBITING THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS CAUSING NUISANCES
CHAPTER 2 ANIMALS PART 1 PROHIBITING THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS CAUSING NUISANCES 101. Intent and Purpose. 102. Definitions. 103. Running at Large. 104. Duty to Secure Animal. 105. Duty to Control Animal.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED COACHWOOD COLONY MHP, LLC, Appellant, v.
More informationPort Huron Charter Township Section Fences Ordinance # 233
Port Huron Charter Township Section 40-737 Fences Ordinance # 233 An Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 40-737. Fences, by the revision of the existing Section to read as follows: The Charter Township
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JAMES RICHARD ARNOLD CAROL ARNOLD, UNPUBLISHED January 25, 2007 Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- Appellees, V Nos. 262349; 263157 St. Joseph Circuit Court DENNIS R. KEMP
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-1096 SHIRLEY ARVIE VERSUS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON
More informationORDINANCE NO. 17-' NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP, WASHTENAW COUNTY Ml
ORDINANCE NO. 17-' NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP, WASHTENAW COUNTY Ml AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN TO AMEND THE NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING THE WHITMORE
More informationSAMPLE CUSTOM PASTURE AGREEMENT
SAMPLE CUSTOM PASTURE AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION Agreements on Custom Pasture and Custom Cattle Feeding should have these features included: fees for pasturing or feeding, services to be provided by the feeder,
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN TOWN OF MUKWA WAUPACA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3-00
STATE OF WISCONSIN TOWN OF MUKWA WAUPACA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3-00 REGULATION OF FISHING RAFTS ON THE WOLF RIVER SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDING OF FACT, PURPOSE, AND TITLE SECTION 1.1 REPEAL
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEHMAN TOWNSHIP LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEHMAN TOWNSHIP LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LEHMAN, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SETTING FORTH THE DEFINITIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE
More informationLiability for Misdeeds of Animals
Liability for Misdeeds of Animals General rule A person is not responsible for injuries caused by an animal unless a specific legal principle says he is. There are three legal principles that may result
More informationTA-Z April 23, 2015
TA-Z-14-09 April 23, 2015 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED ZONING, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 3-403; ARTICLE 6, SECTIONS 6-2101 AND 6-2102; AND ARTICLE 14, SECTION 14-900 AND ADDING
More informationBARTOW COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE
BARTOW COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF BARTOW COUNTY SITTING FOR COUNTY PURPOSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADOPTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE; REGULATING THE USE OF BARTOW
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE TITLE 16. PARTICULAR ACTIONS, PROCEEDINGS AND MATTERS. CHAPTER 11. EJECTMENT AND OTHER REAL PROPERTY ACTIONS. 2001 Edition DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE CHAPTER
More information11/17/2017. Outline. Common Enemy Rule: Sometimes You Have to Help Your Neighbor. SCASM November 16, Historical Background Common Law
Common Enemy Rule: Sometimes You Have to Help Your Neighbor SCASM November 16, 2017 Gene McCall McCall Environmental, PA Greenville, SC Outline Historical Background Evolution and Modern Interpretation
More informationCONSERVATION DISTRICTS
kslegres@klrd.ks.gov 68-West Statehouse, 300 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504 (785) 296-3181 FAX (785) 296-3824 http://www.kslegislature.org/klrd September 18, 2018 CONSERVATION DISTRICTS The following
More informationORDINANCE NO. 33 PENINSULA TOWNSHIP STORM WATER CONTROL ORDINANCE. Description of Purpose and Nature:
ORDINANCE NO. 33 PENINSULA TOWNSHIP STORM WATER CONTROL ORDINANCE Description of Purpose and Nature: AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND REVIEW OF STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 10, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 10, 2014 Session WALTER ALLEN GAULT v. JANO JANOYAN, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 185155-3 Michael W. Moyers, Chancellor
More informationPage Neb.App. 605 (Neb.App. 2007) 734 N.W.2d 314. Spicer RANCH, a Nebraska partnership, appellant,
Page 605 15 Neb.App. 605 (Neb.App. 2007) 734 N.W.2d 314 Spicer RANCH, a Nebraska partnership, appellant, v. Larry SCHILKE, an individual doing business as Mid County Farms, an unincorporated entity, appellee.
More informationCom mon to Ailabama Farmers BULLFTI H NIOVEMS8
BULLFTI H NIOVEMS8,, B LIBRARY O N O q GjQ 4' 4 ''UNw UNRS Com mon to Ailabama Farmers,LAB.',MA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION/AUBURN UNIVERSITY 'ALE A, BUCHANAN, DIRECTOR AUBURN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA CONTENTS
More informationCHAPTER 94: STREETS AND SIDEWALKS. General Provisions
CHAPTER 94: STREETS AND SIDEWALKS Section General Provisions 94.01 Public meetings; permit required 94.02 Compliance with permit terms 94.03 Obstruction of streets and sidewalks prohibited; exception 94.04
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN BY-LAW NO. 2010-91 BEING A BY-LAW FOR PRESCRIBING THE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF FENCES WITHIN THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN WHEREAS the Municipal Act, S.O.2001, Chapter
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 06/01/2012 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SUSAN L. GALLAGHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 10, 2004 v No. 242945 Oakland Circuit Court SHERI FIROSZ, LC No. 2001-029978-CH Defendant-Appellant, and TONY
More informationSOO LINE TRAIL RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS ORDINANCE #14 CARLTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SOO LINE TRAIL RULES AND SAFETY REGULATIONS ORDINANCE #14 CARLTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF THE ABANDONED SOO LINE RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF CARLTON
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES. By-Law
Page - 1 of 7 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES By-Law 2007-84 BEING a By-Law to amend By-Law Number 2005-70, to prescribe the precautions and conditions under which fires may be set in Open
More informationGENERAL ROAD LAW Act of Jun. 13, 1836, P.L. 551, No. 169 AN ACT Relating to roads, highways and bridges. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.
GENERAL ROAD LAW Act of Jun. 13, 1836, P.L. 551, No. 169 AN ACT Cl. 36 Relating to roads, highways and bridges. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Appointment of viewers. Section 2. Duties of viewers. Section
More informationCITY OF YORKTON BYLAW NO. 9/1997
CITY OF YORKTON BYLAW NO. 9/1997 Disclaimer: This information has been provided solely for research convenience. Official bylaws are available from the Office of the City Clerk and must be consulted for
More informationThe Pastures Regulations
PASTURES P-4.1 REG 1 1 The Pastures Regulations being Chapter P-4.1 Reg 1 (effective August 1, 2000) as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 105/2004 and 27/2010. NOTE: This consolidation is not official.
More informationCHAPTER 16. EXCAVATIONS AND ARTIFICIAL POOLS. 1. Article I. Excavations.
CHAPTER 16. EXCAVATIONS AND ARTIFICIAL POOLS. 1 Article I. Excavations. Sec. 16-1 Sec. 16-1. Sec. 16-2. Sec. 16-3. Sec. 16-4. Sec. 16-5. Sec. 16-6. Sec. 16-7. Sec. 16-8. Sec. 16-9. Sec. 16-10. Sec. 16-11.
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WATERLOO
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WATERLOO BY-LAW NUMBER 2013-0 1] A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF FENCES AND PRIVACY SCREENS WITHIN THE CITY OF WATERLOO WHEREAS section 11 (3)(7) of the Municipal
More informationCHAPTER 21 JUNEAU COUNTY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 21 JUNEAU COUNTY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE 21.01 Authority This ordinance is adopted under authority by Section 59.02, 59.03 and 92.16, Wis. Stats. 21.02 Title This ordinance shall be known
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: AUGUST 11, 2006; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2005-CA-001143-MR PAUL KIDD AND ARVETTA ADKINS KIDD APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM ELLIOTT CIRCUIT COURT v.
More informationCity of Otsego Zoning Ordinance Section 16 General Building and Performance Requirements
City of Otsego Zoning Ordinance Section 16 General Building and Performance Requirements 20-16-6: FENCES: Fences shall be permitted in all yards subject to the following: A. Permit Required: It is unlawful
More informationProvince of Alberta STRAY ANIMALS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter S-20. Current as of January 1, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta STRAY ANIMALS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of January 1, 2010 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza
More information