IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
|
|
- Marlene Wright
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ANDERSON COLUMBIA and ) COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, ) INC., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Case No: SC vs. ) ) JAMES BROWN, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF OPINION OF THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S ANSWER TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF T. RHETT SMITH, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No TERESA E. LILES, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No T. RHETT SMITH, P.A. 714 North Spring Street Pensacola, Florida (850) Counsel for Respondent
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents i Table of Authorities ii Introduction 1 Summary of Argument 2 Argument THERE IS NO EXPRESS AND DIRECT CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DECISION OF THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL AND DECISIONS OF OTHER DISTRICT COURTS; ACCORDINGLY, THIS COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION UNDER RULE 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv) 4 Conclusion 9 Certificate of Compliance 10 Certificate of Service 10 i
3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Florida Cases Page Anderson Columbia v. Brown, 30 Fla.L.Weekly D949 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2005) 2,4,9 Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc., 739 So.2d 720 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1999) 4 HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc. v. Hillman, 870 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2003) 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Spaulding v. Albertson s, Inc., 610 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1992) 3 Florida Statutes Section , Fla. Stat. (2003) 3,7,8 Florida Rules of Court Rule 4-1.5(b), R. Regulating Fla. Bar 2-3,7 Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. 2,4,5,6,7,8,9 Rule 9.120(d), Fla.R.App.P. 6 Rule 9.210(a)(2), Fla.R.App.P. 10 ii
4 INTRODUCTION Throughout this Answer Brief, the Petitioners, Anderson Columbia and Commercial Risk Management, Inc., will be referred to collectively as Petitioners. The Respondent, James Brown, will be referrred to as the Respondent. The Judge of Compensation Claims will be referred to as the JCC. 1
5 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT There is no express and direct conflict... on the same question of law between the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Anderson Columbia v. Brown, 30 Fla.L.Weekly D949 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2005) and the opinion rendered by the Second District in HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc. v. Hillman, 870 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2003). Respondent below sought production of the number of hours expended and hourly rate charged by opposing counsel; far from establishing that such information was protected work product in all cases, however, Hillman only stands for the proposition that the discovery may be justified in some cases but not in others and that it is a matter that should rest within the sound discretion of the trial court. Hillman, 870 So.2d at 107. The issue of whether the Judge of Compensation Claims in the instant case abused his discretion is properly raised on direct appeal or by petition for writ of certiorari, and does not form the basis to invoke this Court s conflict jurisdiction under Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. Moreover, while Respondent maintains that the relevancy of the requested information is an issue on the merits, and does not confer conflict jurisdiction under the above-referenced Rule, Petitioners reliance on Hillman is misplaced. That decision dealt with the relevancy of opposing counsel s billing records in establishing a reasonable attorney s fee under Rule 4-1.5(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. Here, the 2003 amendments to F.S preclude any consideration of the factors enumerated in that Rule, and instead limit claimants attorneys to a maximum statutory fee of $1,500.00, regardless of the number of hours expended, difficulty of issues presented, or any other 2
6 consideration. 1 Respondent seeks to build a record in support of a constitutional challenge to F.S , and the information sought in the instant case is directly relevant to demonstrate that the statute unconstitutionally impairs the rights of injured employees to seek counsel and access to the courts. The JCC below agreed that the information sought was relevant, and that determination was upheld by the First District Court of Appeal. Petitioners disagreement with those rulings does not confer conflict jurisdiction on this Court, as the Hillman opinion clearly contemplates that relevancy determinations are within the sound discretion of the trial court. This Court should therefore decline to exercise jurisdiction. 1 This distinction renders the Petitioners reliance on Spaulding v. Albertson s, Inc., 610 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1992) invalid. At the time Spaulding was decided, Judges of Compensation Claims had wide discretion in awarding claimants attorney s fees, unlike the current state of the law which limits one class of attorneys to a maximum fee of $1,500 regardless of the attorney time necessitated in responding to the actions of opposing counsel, who, as the First District noted in Spaulding, enjoy virtually guaranteed payment by solvent insurance companies. Id. at
7 ARGUMENT THERE IS NO EXPRESS AND DIRECT CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DECISION OF THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL AND DECISIONS OF OTHER DISTRICT COURTS; ACCORDINGLY, THIS COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION UNDER RULE 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court to review decisions of the District Courts of Appeal which expressly and directly conflict with a decision of another district court of appeal...on the same question of law. Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. (emphasis supplied). Petititioners argue that the decision below [Anderson Columbia v. Brown, 30 Fla.L.Weekly D949 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2005)] is in express and direct conflict with the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in HCA v. Hillman, 870 So.2d 104 (Fla. 2 nd DCA 2003); however, no such conflict exists. This Court is therefore without jurisdiction to review the decision rendered by the First District below. Petitioners state in their Brief on Jurisdiction that Hillman established without qualification that attorney billing records are protected work product. [Petitioners Jurisdictional Brief at p.3] This statement is incorrect. The Second District in Hillman expressly pointed out the following: In Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc., 739 So.2d 720 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1999), the Fifth District discussed some of the difficulties surrounding discovery of billing records and affirmed an order denying discovery. Judge Griffin accurately noted in that opinion that some jurisdictions bar this discovery but that Florida has not yet adopted a hard and fast rule. This reflects the salutary view that the discovery may be justified in some cases but not in others and that it is a matter that should rest within the sound discretion of the trial court. We agree. Id. at 107 (emphasis supplied). Far from establishing privilege without qualification, 4
8 therefore, the Hillman opinion simply stands for the proposition that the determination of whether the requested discovery should be had is one best left to the discretion of the trial judge. Petitioners continue to argue that the JCC in the instant case abused his discretion in requiring production of the number of hours expended and the hourly rate charged by opposing counsel; however, this argument is properly raised on direct appeal or petition for writ of certiorari to the First District Court of Appeal, and cannot form the basis for this Court to assume conflict jurisdiction under Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. In addition, it should be noted that the Petitioners have already produced the number of hours expended. Accordingly, the only information for which the Petitioners seek protection is the hourly rate charged 2. Nowhere in Hillman opinion does the Second District Court state that the hourly rate charged by opposing counsel is protected by either the attorney-client or the work product privilege. Instead, the Court in Hillman reaffirmed that Florida has no hard and fast rule regarding discovery of such information, and that the issue remains within the discretion of the trial judge. The First District Court of Appeal held that the JCC in this case did not abuse his discretion in ordering production of the billing information, and that determination is not in conflict with the Hillman opinion. In an attempt to demonstrate a conflict between Hillman and the decision of the First District in the instant case, Petitioners argue that the discovery information requested 2 Petitioners state in their brief on jurisdiction that [t]he JCC held that the E/C could redact the description of services rendered. [Petitioners Jurisdictional Brief at p.6, n.1] This statement is misleading. The Claimant expressly represented at hearing that he did not seek production of the description of services rendered, only the number of hours 5
9 herein is not relevant. This is a matter, however, that goes to the merits of this case, and is improperly argued in a jurisdictional brief. Rule 9.120(d), Fla.R.App.P. As noted, Hillman did not state that attorney s fee information is never relevant, only that the information requested in that case was only marginally relevant to the attorney s fee determination. Since the Second District in Hillman specifically recognized that Florida has no hard and fast rule regarding discovery of billing information, there can be no express and direct conflict with the decision below. Since Hillman is not in conflict with the decision rendered by the First District Court of Appeal, let alone in express and direct conflict with that decision, this Court has no conflict jurisdiction under Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. Assuming arguendo that the relevance of the discovery request in the instant case goes to the jurisdictional issue, Respondent will demonstrate that the hourly rate charged by opposing counsel is directly relevant and indeed necessary to build a record for the anticipated constitutional challenge to F.S and that Hillman is inapplicable to the facts of this case. Accordingly, the Hillman decision did not address the same question of law, and the Petitioners attempt to invoke the conflict jurisdiction of this Court should be denied. Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. In Hillman, the successful plaintiffs in a whistleblower case sought production of the defendant s attorney s timesheets, invoices, bills, reimbursements, payments, correspondence, contract for services, fee agreement, hourly fee schedules, all computer generated records pertaining to attorneys fees, costs, expended and hourly rate charged. 6
10 expenses..., or other related documents in the above-named case. Id. at 106. In that case, the Second District granted the defendant s petition for a writ of certiorari and quashed the discovery order, noting that the broad discovery requested therein was only marginally relevant to the factors enumerated in Rule 4-1.5(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar for determining a reasonable attorney s fee. Id. at 107. The issue in the instant case is readily distinguishable. The factors listed in Rule 4-1.5(b) are not applicable here, as F.S precludes any consideration of those factors and instead establishes a maximum statutory attorney s fee of $1, for claimants attorneys without respect to the amount of time expended, difficulty of issues presented, etc. Accordingly, in this case the Respondent is not seeking fees commensurate with the fees charged by defense counsel; F.S precludes such an award. Instead, the Respondent seeks to build a record in support of a constitutional argument that the 2003 amendments to F.S which limit a claimant s attorney to a statutory fee regardless of the hours expended in the litigation (in the instant case, $500) violates injured employees rights to access to counsel and the courts. In other words, unlike the situation in Hillman, the Respondent herein does not seek the fee information to establish a comparable reasonable attorney s fee; in fact, the statutory fee limitation established by the 2003 amendments to F.S makes such a demonstration impossible. Instead, the Respondent seeks to demonstrate that the statutory fee limitation is unreasonable. The JCC below held that the number of hours expended and hourly rate charged by opposing counsel were relevant to build a record in support of a constitutional challenge; the First District Court of Appeal agreed. Petitioners disagreement with those rulings cannot form the basis for conflict jurisdiction under Rule 7
11 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), since the decision on which Petitioners rely to assert conflict contemplates that such determinations of relevance are within the sound discretion of the trial court. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated herein, the Petitioners have failed to demonstrate an express and direct conflict between the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Anderson Columbia v. Brown, supra, and any decision from any other district or from this Court. Accordingly, Petitioners have failed to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), Fla.R.App.P. Respectfully submitted, T. RHETT SMITH, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No, TERESA E. LILES, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No T. RHETT SMITH, P.A. 714 North Spring Street Pensacola, Florida (850) Counsel for Respondent 8
12 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Answer Brief on Jurisdiction is in compliance with the font requirements of Rule 9.210(a)(2), Fla.R.App.P. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE T. RHETT SMITH, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No, TERESA E. LILES, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No T. RHETT SMITH, P.A. 714 North Spring Street Pensacola, Florida (850) Counsel for Respondent I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Mary L. Wakeman, Esq., and Ryan M. Barnett, Esq., McConnaughhay, Duffy, Coonrod, Pope & Weaver, P.A., Post Office Drawer 229, Tallahassee, Florida , counsel for Petitioners, by regular U.S. Mail, this 18th day of July, T. RHETT SMITH, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No, TERESA E. LILES, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No T. RHETT SMITH, P.A. 714 North Spring Street Pensacola, Florida (850) Counsel for Respondent 9
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ANDERSON COLUMBIA and * COMMERCIAL RISK * MANAGEMENT, INC., * * Petitioners, * * Case No.: SC05-1073 v. * * JAMES BROWN, * * Respondent. * * ON PETITION FOR
More informationv. DCA CASE N,O: 2Q STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SCOTTIE SMART, JR. Petitioner CASE NO: v. DCA CASE N,O: 2Q12-55037 STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent.>+t PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF ON REVIEW FROM THE 2" DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RAMESES, INC., d/b/a CLEO S and STEVEN G. MASON, P.A., v. Petitioners, Case No.: SC10-670 Lower Tribunal: 5D09-208 JERRY DEMINGS, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Richard Zaldivar, Esquire Jay M. Levy,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CARLOS VALDES v. Petitioner, SC Case: SC04-199 First DCA Case: 1D02-4026 INTEGRATED ADMINISTRATORS and WAL-MART STORE #6020, Respondent. / On discretionary review from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SCO LYNN HILLMAN, MARY PATRICIA BOSNER and ROBERTA JAMES, Petitioners,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SCO5-284 LYNN HILLMAN, MARY PATRICIA BOSNER and ROBERTA JAMES, Petitioners, v. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a BLAKE MEDICAL CENTER, Respondent. RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-2047 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D07-2834 JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-971 JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs. GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC., SOUTHERN UNDERWRITERS, INC., CAPITAL ASSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FIRST DISTRICT CASE NO. 1D L.T. CASE NO CA WENDY HABEGGER, Petitioner, vs.
Filing # 11759404 Electronically Filed 03/26/2014 10:24:29 AM RECEIVED, 3/26/2014 10:28:40, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-2506 FIRST DISTRICT CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. DAPHNE ELAINE HENSON, Florida Second District Court of Appeal Case Appellee. Number: 2D /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DOUGLAS LEE HENSON Appellant, Case Nos. SC06-1003 v. DAPHNE ELAINE HENSON, Florida Second District Court of Appeal Case Appellee. Number: 2D06-826 / APPELLEE'S BRIEF ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KENNETH JENKINS, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-2088 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Lower Tribunal Case No: 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA GUERDA FREDERIC, Case No: NOT YET ASSIGNED Petitioner, Lower Tribunal Case No: 1D11-4956 vs. HMSHOST CORPORATION/GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES INC., Respondent. / PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Case No. SC02-2736 5th DCA Case Nos.: 5D01-1662, 5D01-1663, 5D01-1664, 5D01-1665 & 5D01-3426 GREAT AMERICAN RESTAURANTS, INC., et al, v. Petitioners/Appellants,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC02-2646 BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA and ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Respondents. PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1027 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., d/b/a/ NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY OSTEOPATHIC TREATMENT CENTER, v. Petitioner/Defendant, SUSAN R. BURKE Respondent/Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC th DCA CASE NO. 5D L.T. CASE NO. DR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1348 5 th DCA CASE NO. 5D05-3200 L.T. CASE NO. DR99-8641 IN RE: DENISE AYALA, Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM A. GONZALEZ, Respondent. / RESPONDENT=S AMENDED REPLY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1248 WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-1823 BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF Petitioners, vs. OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL SECOND DISTRICT, LAKELAND, FLORIDA. L.T. Case No CA-4619 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR MANDAMUS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL SECOND DISTRICT, LAKELAND, FLORIDA SALTWATER HOME RESOURCES, INC., Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 41-2011-CA-4619 v. Case No.: 2D12- UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEITH R. HARRIS, DC# 635563 Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC08-1367 L.T. No. 1D06-5125 THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURIDICTION
More informationRESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TRUST CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO.: SC11-353 v. DCA NO.: 3D09-2568 STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent/Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-352 THE VILLAS DEL VERDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, vs. CLARK H. SCHERER, III, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, vs. Petitioner, Supreme Court Case No. SC03-2063 THIRD DCA CASE NO. 02-3002 LT Case No. 00-21824 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LESTER SMULL, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 4 TH DCA CASE NO.:4D02-1818 v. THE TOWN OF JUPITER, a Florida municipal corporation Respondent. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationCASE NO. 1D Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARIA SUAREZ, v. Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-3495
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 1D ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC07-1175 Lower Tribunal No.: 1D06-1760 ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M. BLOODSWORTH, Petitioners, vs. MICHAEL E. GRAY, Respondent. ON REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC Respondent. RESPONDENT V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationAPPELLEE'S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12-1848 3DCA CASE NO. 3D10-3009 YOLANDA CARMEN FERRARA, Appellant, vs. EDSON CARLOS DE CAMPOS, Appellee. APPELLEE'S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION NANCY A. HASS, ESQUIRE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA GORDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES Respondent. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID03-449 PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC10-2453 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D 09-161 L.T. CASE NO. 05-15300 BARBARA J. TUCKER, Petitioner, vs. LPP MORTGAGE LTD., f/k/a LOAN PARTICIPANT PARTNERS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D06-2266 JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
Filing # 8803708 Electronically Filed 01/03/2014 05:25:42 PM RECEIVED, 1/3/2014 17:28:35, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. and ANHEUSER-BUSCH,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 52860487 E-Filed 02/22/2017 10:20:05 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JANE E. CAREY, ESQ., and JANE E. CAREY, P.A., Petitioners, CASE NO: SC17- v. RECEIVED, 02/22/2017 10:23:34 PM, Clerk, Supreme
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PUTNAM COUNTY, Petitioner, JOHN EDMONDS and MARY EDMONDS., Respondent.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC12-1665 PUTNAM COUNTY, Petitioner, v. JOHN EDMONDS and MARY EDMONDS., Respondent. ON REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA L.T.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RONALDCARTER CASE NO. SC 3 ~ 3 Petitioner, DCA CASE NO. 5D12-4110 V. TOMMY BROZINO Respondant. Am»deà PETITIONERS JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review from the District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Jerome S. Rydell and Dale E. Krueger, individually and derivatively, on behalf of the shareholders of Surf Tech International, Inc., and Sigma Financial Corporation, a Michigan
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA FRANCIS D. PETSCH, CASE NO. SC04-917 Petitioner, v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.; ROLLINS, INC; DAVID BERNSTEIN, individually, and RICK PROTHERO,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. Case No: SC vs. D.C.A. Case No: 3D Cir. Ct. Case No: CA
YOLANDA G. MINAGORRI, Petitioner, IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Sup. Ct. Case No: SC07-1171 vs. D.C.A. Case No: 3D06-3015 Cir. Ct. Case No: 00-293-CA ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI, INC. Respondent. / PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT C. MALT & CO., INC., Petitioner, v. Case No. SCO8-1527 PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D07-3104 Respondent. / RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A/A/O MARVELIS BAUZA, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-131 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-771 PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A/A/O MARVELIS BAUZA, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No.: SC L.T. No.: 1D /3350
GRACE ERIS and KAY C. HOWERTON, Appellants/Petitioners, THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Case No.: SC04-2370 L.T. No.: 1D02-0202/3350 DANNY ATKINS and JAN (consolidated) WALKER, Appellees/Respondents. ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND RSKCO S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA VICKI LUCAS, vs. Petitioner, ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and RSKCO, CASE NO.: SC07-1736 L.T. Case No.: 1D06-5161 Respondents. / RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC Fifth DCA Case No. 5D th Judicial Circuit Case No. 06-CA-1003 and 06-CA-8702
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC10-1892 Fifth DCA Case No. 5D09-1761 9 th Judicial Circuit Case No. 06-CA-1003 and 06-CA-8702 Upon Petition for Discretionary Jurisdiction Review Of A Decision
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEVIN TRACY. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC07-2057 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D01-3050 CITY OF MIAMI Petitioner vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STERLING R. LANIER, JR. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-19 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA QUIETWATER ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ) FRED SIMMONS, MICHAEL A. GUERRA ) JUNE B. GUERRA, WAS, INC., and ) SANDPIPER-GULF AIRE INN, INC., ) ) Petitioners, ) CASE NO. SC05-215
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-901 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 1D AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BOBBY FLOYD
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA JULIE CONNELL and CENTURY 21- WINSTON CONNELL, Realtor, Defendants/Petitioners, vs. BOBBY FLOYD, BIG BEND TIMBER SERVICES, INC., JERRY WALTON, and RICHARD CONNELL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC06-2110 Lower Court Case Number 4D05-4560 EDWARD SEGAL, Petitioner, vs. BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Respondent. BROWARD COUNTY S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE No. 4DCA No. 4D LOREEN I. KREIZINGER, P.A., a Florida Professional Association, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 4DCA No. 4D04-2919 LOREEN I. KREIZINGER, P.A., a Florida Professional Association, Petitioner, v. SHELDON J. SCHLESINGER, P.A., a Florida Professional Association,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CORBBLIN BUSH, v. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Supreme Court Case No.: SC04-2306 DCA Case No.: 5D04-42 L.T. Case No.: 90-3798-CFA Respondents. Petitioner Corbblin
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC06-2349 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 4D05-3911 THOMAS D. LARDIN, P.A., a Florida Professional Association and THOMAS D. LARDIN, ESQUIRE, Defendant/Petitioners, v.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Respondent. /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D10-1422 ANA MARIA AGUILAR-FERNANDEZ, vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EDWIN MATOS, PETITIONER, CASE NO: SC05-887 Lower Trib. Case No: 4D03-2043 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. / PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Fleischman & Fleischman,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC Respondent. PETITIONER S REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS David H. Charlip, Esq. Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Electronically Filed 06/27/2013 12:18:58 PM ET RECEIVED, 6/27/2013 12:23:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHNNIE LEE REMBERT, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC13-1125
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.
Filing # 17071819 Electronically Filed 08/13/2014 05:11:43 PM RECEIVED, 8/13/2014 17:13:41, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1575 CHRISTINE BAUER and
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. PETITIONER, CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 5D05- AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ELIAS MORALES, ET AL. 4295 vs. PETITIONER, CASE NO.: SC06-1322 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D05- LETICIA J. MARQUES, RESPONDENT. / AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Elias Morales,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. Supreme Court Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal Case No.:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOSEPH R. REDNER, Petitioner, v. Supreme Court Case No.: SC03-1612 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 96-02652 CITY OF TAMPA, Respondent. PETITIONER S FIRST AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-966 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D07-2145 AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY and AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Petitioners, CASE NO: vs. Lower Tribunal No. 2D01-5770 BILTMORE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and CENTRAL-ALLIED ENTERPRISES,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO CASE NO. SC05-1181 L.T. 2D04-4867 Petitioner, v. PINELLAS COUNTY AND CIRCUIT COURTS OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA; STATE OF FLORIDA;
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. CASE No.: SC
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE No.: SC03-2029 CITY OF HALLANDALE, a municipality, Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D02-3366 (District Court of Appeal of Petitioner, Florida, Fourth District)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DOUGLAS D. STRATTON, STRATTON & FEINSTEIN, P.A. and DAVID LESMAN Case No.: 3D11-205 Consolidated: 3D11-20 Petitioners, vs. 6000 INDIAN CREEK, LLC, et al., L/T Case No.:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000072-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-007488-O Appellant, v. FLORIDA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1823 CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MARK ONDREY, vs. Appellant/Petitioner, FLORENCE PATTERSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN WILLIAM PATTERSON, deceased. Case No.: SC04-961
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MICHAEL F. SHEEHAN, M.D., Petitioner, vs. SCOTT SWEET, Respondent. / Case No.: SC06-1373 2nd DCA Case No.: 2D04-2744 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 03-5936G Hillsborough County, Florida
More informationCASE NO. 1D Stephen D. Hurm, General Counsel, and Jason Helfant, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
More informationCASE NO. 1D M. Kemmerly Thomas of McConnaughhay, Duffy, Coonrod, Pope & Weaver, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALACHUA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD/FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARDS INSURANCE TRUST, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL L. MURRAY & JAMES L. BRINK, Petitioners, v. District Court Case No. 5D10-1376 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS J. BRIAN PAGE Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06- TIMOTHY M. CORNELL, JR., and MARK CORNELL, petitioners, vs. JULIA MORGAN, respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA,
More informationCASE NO. SC10- L.T. No. 3D GLK, L.P., a Washington limited partnership, and EMANUEL ORGANEK,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10- L.T. No. 3D09-591 GLK, L.P., a Washington limited partnership, and EMANUEL ORGANEK, vs. Petitioners, FOUR SEASONS HOTELS LIMITED, a Canadian corporation,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D02-3362) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST JR., Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. No.: CA 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA BEATRICE HURST, as Personal Representative of the Estate of KENNETH HURST, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC07-722 L.T. No.:04-24071 CA 13 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC10-2418 RANDY SCOTT RIESEL, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT NANCY A. DANIELS PUBLIC DEFENDER DAVID P. GAULDIN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC11- ALBERTO G. DAVID, JR., Petitioner, vs. LORETTA L. DAVID, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC11- ALBERTO G. DAVID, JR., Petitioner, vs. LORETTA L. DAVID, Respondent. On Review from the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, State of Florida Case No.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC, A Florida Corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff. An Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC District Court Case No.: 4D CYBERKNIFE CENTER OF THE TREASURE COAST, LLC,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC11-1914 District Court Case No.: 4D11-484 CYBERKNIFE CENTER OF THE TREASURE COAST, LLC, Petitioner, vs. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. D/B/A
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-2097 JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, v. THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents. BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM E. WILLIAMSON, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-2192 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OLIVER BOZEMAN, CASE NO. SC06-1463 Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D04-2232 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ****************************************************************
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHNEE ANN ALLE HIRCHERT CASE NO.: SC11-1673 v. Petitioner, 5DCA#:5D09-3054 HIRCHERT FAMILY TRUST Respondent / 9 th Judicial Circuit Court Case No.: CI-06-OC-1397 PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA AMERICA ONLINE, INC., : : Petitioner : : v. : Case No. : ROBERT PASIEKA, on behalf : L.T. Case No: 1D03-2290 of himself and all others : similarly situated,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D DOCTOR DIABETIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant / Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1922 3DCA CASE NO. 3D09-1475 DOCTOR DIABETIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant / Petitioner, v. POAP CORP. d/b/a EXCHANGE PLACE, Appellee / Respondent. PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SCO5-1150
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SCO5-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, RULE 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENTS OF ATTORNEY ROBERT RAY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MYRA VAIVADA, Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-867 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE FORFEITURE OF: ONE 1988 LINCOLN TOWN CAR, VIN 1LNBM81F8JY612959 AND ONE 1986 LINCOLN TOWN CAR, VIN 1LNBP96F7GY660841 JOSEPH T. DEGREGORIO, Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC L.T. No. DO LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-189 L.T. No. DO4-5585 LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION; WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-54 L.T. NO. 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-54 L.T. NO. 2D03-1594 VANDERBILT SHORES CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC., VANDERBILT CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC., VANDERBILT LANDINGS, CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JUNIOR JOSEPH, ) ) Appellee/Petitioner, ) ) 5th DCA Case No. 5D09-1356 ) ) Supreme Court Case No. SC11-179 STATE OF FLORIDA,) ) Appellant/Respondent. ) ) APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA S. CT. CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILFRID METELLUS, Petitioner, S. CT. CASE NO. SC02-1494 vs. DCA CASE NO. 5D01-1044 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROB BRAYSHAW, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CASE NO.: SC11-507 FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D09-5894 L.T. CASE NO.: 2009-1337L AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT
More informationID. NO. FORMAL PROPOSAL TO AMEND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE COMES NOW, the undersigned attorney, RYAN THOMAS TRUSKOSKI,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE ID. NO. IN RE: PROPOSAL TO AMEND RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.130, / FORMAL PROPOSAL TO AMEND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.130 COMES NOW, the undersigned
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D02-289
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2002 VESTA FIRE INSURANCE, ETC. Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5D02-289 GLADYS FIGUEROA, Respondent. / Opinion filed July 26, 2002
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA VERNON GOINS, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC06-356 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More information