IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
|
|
- Teresa Spencer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Samantha Bishop, Administratrix of the Estate of James Bishop, Jr. and Virginia Bishop On appeal from the Hamilton County Court of Appeals Appellant, First Appellate District vs.. Court of Appeals Case No. C Carpenters' Union Local #126, et al.. Supreme Court Case No Appeliees MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JURISDICTION OF APPELLEES, CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION #126, DAVID MEIER, JEFFREY SMITH, AND JOHN WISHER Mark A. MacDonald ( ) Freund, Freeze & Arnold 105 East Fourth Street, Ste Cinciimati, OH Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE CARPENTERS' UNIONT LOCAL #126 William C. Knapp ( ) Weber & Knapp Co., LPA 8044 Montgomery Road, Suite 120 Cincinnati, OH Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT SAMANTHA BISHOP, ADMX. Lawrence E. Barbiere ( ) Schroeder Maundrell Barbiere & Powers Mason Road, Ste. 110 Cincinnati, OH Telephone: Facsimile: COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE STRICKER'S GROVE,LLC FIED AUG CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO I
2 Christine Steele ( ) Eagen & Wycoff Co. LPA 2349 Victory Parlcway Cincinnati, OH Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) COUNSEL FOR JENNIFER WEIR Melissa Subit ( ) Buckley King LPA 201 East Fifth Street, Ste Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) corn COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE JOHN WISHER Timotlry Heather ( ) Benjamin Yocum & Heather LLC 300 Pike Street, Ste Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE DAVID Iv1EIER Joseph Kammer ( ) The Nathaniel Ropes Building 917 Main St., Second Floor Telephone: (513) Facsimile: (513) No COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE JOHN WISHER
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS THIS CASE IS NOT OF PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST...:...1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS...1 ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEE'S POSITION ON PROPOSITIONS OF LAW...1 Appellant's Proposition of Law No. I Requiring the payment of an admission fee to gain entrance into a premises where those in attendance are provided alcoholic beverages without further charge constitutes the "sale" of alcoholic beverages... I Appellant's Proposition of Law No. 2 Persons who wilawfully sell alcoholic beverages without a permit are liable in tort to innocent third parties injured by intoxicated persons leaving the event...3 CONCLUSION... 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE...:...:...5 i A Legal Professional Associa[ion
4 THIS CASE IS NOT OF PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST This case involves an area of law that has been well developed in prior decisions of this Court. Resolution of this case did not require the creation of any new law but only the.application of well established law to the unique facts of this case. As such, this case is not of great general or public interest but is of significant interest only to the parties themselves. Indeed, the current state of the law, as set forth in Settlemyer, infra, and its progeny, already prevents the commercial exploitation of the social host rule that Appellant raises as a specter of future disaster. The social host rule does not permit commercial sellers of alcohol to throw "drink and drown parties." It only permits social hosts to avoid liquor liability. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In the case at bar, these Appellees are a labor union and some of its individual members and the claims against them arose from their amiual picnic, a social event. The procedural posture and pertinent facts are succinctly set forth in the decision of the court of appeals, attached to Appellant's memorandum in support of jurisdiction. We add only that it is undisputed that the union lost a total of $9, hosting the picnic and was clearly not a commercial proprietor with a profit motive. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEE'S POSITION ON PROPOSITIONS OF LAW Appellant's Proposition of Law No. I Requiring the payment of an admission fee to gain entrance into a premises where those in attendance are provided alcoholic beverages without further charge constitutes the "sale" of alcoholic beverages. In Settlemyer v. Wilmington Veterans Post No. 49 (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 123, 464 N.E.2d 521, this Court made it clear that a social (non-comrnercial) provider of alcoholic beverages cannot be liable to a third person subsequently injured bv an intoxicated person served by that -1- FREUND,FREEZE & ARNOLD
5 social host. This Court created an exception to that rule in Mitseff v. Wheeler (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 112, 526 N.E.2d 798, which held that a social host can be liable to a third party injured by an intoxicated person if the social host provided alcohol to a minor in violation of statute and that minor caused injury to the third person by virtue of his intoxication. This Cour-t lias already stated that the terms "sale" or "sell" are confined to their ordinary meaning when analyzing the question of whether or not there was a sale of alcoholic beverages in this context. Settlemyer, supra, 11 Ohio St. 3d at 127, 464 N.E.2d at 524. The court of appeals correctly determined that the admission charge paid by Jennifer Weir, if any, was payment for admission to the event and did not qualify as a sale of beer. To hold otherwise would be to say that the purchase of a ticket at the front gate constituted a sale of beer. If that were the case, the union sold beer to everyone who paid an admission fee whether or not they drank beer. The truth is that the payment of an admission fee does not constitute a sale of beer as the term "sale" is ordinarily used. Equally irnportant to this analysis is the fact that the union was sponsoring a social event, not engaging in a commercial enterprise. This is obvious from the fact that it is an annual picnic on which the union lost a lot of money. it was an event that included a picnic, food, rides, and soft drinks as well as beer in return for the price of admission. The policy reasons supporting a distinction between a social host and a commercial provider of alcohol were set forth by this Court in Settlernyer as follows:... a social provider of intoxicating beverages should not be held to the same duty of care that a commercial proprietor is subject to under Mason. As the appellee points out, the commercial proprietor has a proprietary interest and profit motive, and should be expected to exercise greater supervision than in the (noncommercial) social setting. Moreover, a person in the business of selling and serving alcohol is usually better organized to control patrons, and has the financial wherewithal to do so. It is also reasonable to conclude that by virtue of its
6 experience, the commercial proprietor is more familiar with its customers and their habits and capacities. Settlenxyer, supra, I l Ohio St.3d at 127, 464NT.E.2d at 524. It is worth noting that the decision of the court of appeals below is in accord with Stevens v. Local UnitedAuto Workers (7"' Dist. 1996), 110 Ohio App. 3d 153, 673 N.E.2d 930, which is a remarkably similar case involving a third party's claim of injury due to an intoxicated person who had consumed alcohol at a labor union event. As in the case at bar, the court of appeals in Stevens was able to reach a well reasoned decision based on the guidance previously provided by this Court in Settlemyer, supra and Mitseff, supra In the end, Ohio c6urts must analyze the facts and circumstances of each individual case to determine whether or not there was a sale of beer. In the case at bar, both the trial court and a unanimous court of appeals' panel determined that there was no sale of beer on the facts and circumstances presented. The conclusions of these courts is clearly correct and in accord with the reasoning of the 7`h Dist. Court of Appeals on similar facts in Stevens, supra, 110 Ohic App.3d at 158, 673 N.E.2d at 934. Appellant's Pronosition of Law No. 2 Persons who uniawfuiiy sell aicoholic beverages without a permit are liable in tort to innocent third parties injured by intoxicated personsleaving the event. This proposition of law has no application to the facts of this case because, as argued above, there was no sale of beer by Appellees. Unlike the social host in Mitseff v. Wheeler, supra, Appellees provided beer lawfully to their guests. Jemiifer Weir was not a minor and no statute was being violated. Even if one assumes that there was a sale of beer by Appellees to Jennifer Weir, and if one further assumes that this constituted the sale of beer wifllout a permit, such conduct should not make Appellees an insurer of Jennifer Weir. -3- FREUND,FREEZE & ARNOLD A Legal Professinnal Association
7 Statutes requiring permits. to sell beer are not specific safety statutes and, therefore, violation of the permit requirernent should not be considered negligence per se. See Chambers v. St. Mary's School (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 563, 697 N.E.2d 198. Negligence would still need to be proven. In addition, a proximate cause requirement would still be necessary. The record below is devoid of any real evidence of negligence or proximate cause. Thus, even if one makes the incorrect assumptiori inherent in the proposition of law that there was a sale of beer by the union to Jennifer Weir, the proposition of law is still incoitect. One who sells beer without a permit should not thereby automatically become an insurer of those to whom the beer was sold. Therefore, the proposition of law should not be adopted by this Court. CONCLUSION The rule of no liability for social hosts-articulated by this Court in Settlemyer and its progeny is well established in Ohio law. The policy reasons supporting the different legal standards for a commercial provider of alcohol versus a social host are as sound today as they were when first articulated by this Court in Settlemyer. As a factual matter, Appellees were social providers of beer which was giveri away to guests in attendance at the annual picnic. The fact that Jennifer Weir may have paid an admission fee to gain entrance to the event does not, in any case, constitute a sale of beer. In view of the fact that the law in this area is not in need of further development by this. Court and because the trial court and the court of appeals correctly applied existing law to the unique facts presented, there is no need for this Court to spend its valuable time on this case. -4-
8 Respectfully submitted, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Mark A. MacDonald ( ) Freund, Freeze & Arnold 105 East Fourth Street, Ste Telephone: (5L3) Facsimile: (513) mmacdonald0ffalaw.com Counsel for Appellees I hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served this day of August, 2008, via regular mail upon the following: William C. Knapp, Esq. Weber & Knapp Co., LPA Bank One Towers 8044 Montgomery Road, Ste. 120 Cincinnati, OH Lawrence E. Barbiere, Esq. Schroeder Maundrell Barbiere & Powers Mason Road, Ste. 110 Cincinnati, OH Christine Steele, Esq. Eagen & Wycoff Co. LPA 2349 Victory Parkway Cinciimati, OH Melissa Subit, Esq. Buckley King LPA 201 East Fifth Street, Ste Timothy Heatlrer, Esq. Benjamin Yocum & Heather LLC 300 Pike Street, Ste. 500 Cincinnati, OII FREUND,FREEZE & ARNOLD -
9 Joseph Kamnmer,Esq. The Nathaniel Ropes Building 917 Main St., Second Floor Mark A. MacDonald -6-
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CASE NO. 12-CA-0032
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CASE NO. 12-CA-0032 WAYNE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TRIAL COURT CASE NO. 12-CV-0124 KATHRYN KICK, as the personal representative of
More informationE rea z ^^ CLERK OF COURT REME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ^^ WALDRON, Case No Appellant
0^^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ^^ WALDRON, Appellant V. RICKEY, et al., Case No. 2014-0188 On Appeal from the Hamilton County Court of Appeals, First Appellate District Case No. C 130274 Appellees MEMORANDUM
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Snider v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., 2005-Ohio-1989.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84989 DAVID S. SNIDER, ET AL., : ACCELERATED : Plaintiffs-Appellants
More information[Cite as Ahmad v. AK Steel Corp., 119 Ohio St.3d 1210, 2008-Ohio-4082.]
[Cite as Ahmad v. AK Steel Corp., 119 Ohio St.3d 1210, 2008-Ohio-4082.] AHMAD, APPELLANT, v. AK STEEL CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Ahmad v. AK Steel Corp., 119 Ohio St.3d 1210, 2008-Ohio-4082.]
More informationIN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * * JANE HEALY, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CR09-100 vs. DEPT. NO.: 1 CHARLES RAYMOND, an individual, ALLEGRETTI
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ELECTRONICALLY FILED 12/19/2008 3:29 PM CV-2008-901617.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK PATSY
More informationLED. AUG 2 3 Zq1Z CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CHARLES POWELL, Appellee, vs. JOHN H. RION, ESQ., et al. On Appeal from the Montgomery County Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District Court of Appeals Case No. 24756 Ohio
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs, : Case No. 12CV1245. v. : Judge Berens
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO MELISSA NICHOLS, ET AL., : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 12CV1245 v. : Judge Berens JONATHAN MILLER, ET AL., Defendants. : : : JUDGMENT ENTRY Denying Plaintiffs
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Ohio
82976-112325 96993] Ns 2008-0304 In the Supreme Court of Ohio a 11 SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, P. Plaintiff-Appellant, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et ag, Defendants-Appellees. CLAIMED APPEAL OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. DARRELL SAMPSON, Case No Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the V.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO DARRELL SAMPSON, Case No. 10-1561 Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the V. Eighth District Court of Appeals Cuyahoga County, Ohio CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY,
More informationLLU) 31n the ^&upreme Court of Yjio. MAY 0120t3. ci_f.nk OF COURT Sl.lPREiViE COURT OF OHIO. Case No EDWIN LUCIANO, NCC SOLUTIONS, INC.
^ 31n the ^&upreme Court of Yjio EDWIN LUCIANO, V. Plaintiff-Appellant, Case No. 2013-0523 On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District, NCC SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Durbin v. Kokosing Constr. Co., Inc., 2007-Ohio-554.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOEL M. DURBIN, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF STEVEN M. DURBIN, DECEASED Plaintiff-Appellant
More informationWILLIAM CALHOUN. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No STATE OF OHIO. Appellant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No. 09-2324 STATE OF OHIO Appellant -vs- WILLIAM CALHOUN On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District, Case No. 92103 Appellant ROBERT
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff/Appellant : CASE NO CVF 01712
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO S-THREE, LLC, : Plaintiff/Appellant : CASE NO. 2013 CVF 01712 vs. : Judge McBride BATAVIA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : ZONING APPEALS : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant/Appellee
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12CV577. v. : Judge Berens
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO PNC BANK NATIONAL ASS N, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 12CV577 v. : Judge Berens ANTHONY CLARK, ET AL., : ENTRY Denying Motion to Vacate Default Judgment Defendants.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. JAMES CONRAD, ADMIN., BWC, : (Civil Appeal from Common ET AL. : Pleas Court)
[Cite as Walker v. Conrad, 2004-Ohio-259.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO TINA M. WALKER : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. Case No. 19704 v. : T.C. Case No. 01-CV-3600 JAMES CONRAD, ADMIN.,
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. PICKERINGTON PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, : Case No. 10 CV 1235
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO PICKERINGTON PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, : Case No. 10 CV 1235 v. : Judge Berens : CRUMRINE, LLC, ET AL., : ENTRY Sustaining in part and overruling
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID W. MCGUIRE, Individually as Next Friend of TY N. MCGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION November 15, 2005 9:10 a.m. v No. 251950 Wayne Circuit Court DEANNA
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, 2015 - Case No. 2014-0485 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SRMOF 2009-1 Trust, : : Case No. 2014-0485 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : On Appeal from the Butler
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed May 15, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO * * * * * * * * * *
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed May 15, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0615 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO DELLA WALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. THE KROGER CO., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal No. 15-0615 Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Robert A. Neinast, CASE NO. 11-0435 -vs- Plaintiff - Petitioner On Appeal from the Fairfield County Court of Appeals, Fifth District Case No. 2010-CA-011 Board of Trustees
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GRACE MADEJSKI, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of ANNA MADEJSKI, Deceased, FOR PUBLICATION June 15, 2001 9:15 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellant, v
More informationAKRoN LAW REVIEW TORT LIABILITY. Liability of Liquor Vendors for Injuries to Intoxicated Persons
AKRoN LAW REVIEW [Vol. 14:2 TORT LIABILITY Liability of Liquor Vendors for Injuries to Intoxicated Persons Kemock v. Mark I1, 62 Ohio App. 2d 103, 404 N.E.2d 766 (1978) N AN OPINION anticipating, in part,
More informationAUQ 2 0 2oo9 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Appellee. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO No and No GEORGE SULLIVAN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO No. 2008-0691 and No. 2008-0817 GEORGE SULLIVAN Appellee V. ANDERSON TOWNSHIP, et al. On Appeal from the Haniilton County Court of Appeals First Appellate District Court of
More informationL E. ORtGiNAL APR CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No OHIOTELNET.COM, Inc.
ORtGiNAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OHIOTELNET.COM, Inc. Appellants, V. The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Case No. 12-0027 Appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Public Utilities
More information[Cite as Carpino v. Wheeling Volkswagen-Subaru, 2001-Ohio-3357.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as Carpino v. Wheeling Volkswagen-Subaru, 2001-Ohio-3357.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT JOSEPH CARPINO, ) ) CASE NO. 00 JE 45 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) )
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DANIELLE WORTHY
[Cite as State v. Worthy, 2010-Ohio-6168.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94565 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DANIELLE WORTHY
More informationJeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon (503)
Jeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 243-1022 hill@bodyfeltmount.com LIQUOR LIABILITY I. Introduction Liquor Liability the notion of holding
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Eclipse Cos., 2015-Ohio-4005.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) THE OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY Appellant v. ECLIPSE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STEVEN NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION October 25, 2002 9:00 a.m. v No. 228050 Kalamazoo Circuit Court JONATHAN DOBLER, LC No. 97-002646-NO Defendant, and
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Roseman Bldg., LLC v. Vision Power Sys., Inc., 2010-Ohio-229.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSEMAN BUILDING CO., LLC JUDGES Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee
More informationF DD JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No. 2007-1141 NANCY ROUDEBUSH WHITNEY AND THOMAS R. ROUDEBUSH, etal. Appellants vs. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO Appellee MEMORANDUM OF APPELLEE BOARD
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Denney Motors Associates, Inc. et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) O P I N I O N
[Cite as Khoury v. Denney Motors Assoc., Inc., 2007-Ohio-5791.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Steve Khoury et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : No. 06AP-1024 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CV-13352)
More informationF I -^ JUN CLERK OF COURT JUN SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SUPREME (;UURT OF OHIO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO LAWRENCE J.
THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO LAWRENCE J. SELEVAN, Appellant, -vs LEAH SELEVAN, Appellee. 12-2 6 On Appeal from the Hamilton County Court of Appeals, First Appellate District Court of Appeals Consolidated
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO
[Cite as Owners Ins. Co. v. Westfield Ins. Co., 2010-Ohio-1499.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 1-09-60 v.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Wolf v. Southwestern Place Condominium Assn., 2002-Ohio-5195.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT RAYMOND A. WOLF, ) ) CASE NO. 01 CA 93 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
More informationIN TIIE SUPRREME COURT OF OHIO
..,^^,s^i^^,^l IN TIIE SUPRREME COURT OF OHIO CHRISTINE L. FOOR, Plaintiff-Appellee CASE NO. 13-1282 -vs- On. Appeal from the Fifth District Court of Appeals Case No. 12 CAE 08 0063 COLU-NIBUS REAL ESTATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORlGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR * Case No. 2012-0897 THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-30T1, * MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH On Appeal from the
More informationCLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. CITY OF COLUMBUS Case No Plaintiff-Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CITY OF COLUMBUS Case No. 10-1334 vs. Plaintiff-Appellee, STEPHEN E. ALESHIRE, Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal from the Franklin County Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate District
More informationALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,
[Cite as Allstate Ins. Co. v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., 2012-Ohio-90.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97065 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as McIntyre v. Rice, 2003-Ohio-3940.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 81339 ROBERT W. McINTYRE, ET AL. : : Plaintiffs-Appellants : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND : NANCY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. AMERICAN TAX FUNDING, LLC., : et al. Plaintiff-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO.
[Cite as Am. Tax Funding L.L.C. v. Miamisburg, 2011-Ohio-4161.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO AMERICAN TAX FUNDING, LLC., : et al. Plaintiff-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO. 24494 vs. :
More informationHAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO State of Ohio : CASE NO.: PLAINTIFF : JUDGE: -vs- : DEFENDANT : : MOTION TO DISMISS Now comes Defendant,, by and through counsel, and hereby moves the Court to dismiss the charge
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12CV694. v. : Judge Berens
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO BM-CLARENCE CARDWELL, INC., : Plaintiff, : Case No. 12CV694 v. : Judge Berens COCCA DEVELOPMENT LTD., ET AL, Defendants. : : : ENTRY REGARDING MOTIONS
More informationKY DRAM SHOP MEMO II
I. Kentucky s Dram Shop Act KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II KRS 413.241 Legislative finding; limitation on liability of licensed sellers or servers of intoxicating beverages; liability of intoxicated person (1) The
More informationCV. In the Court of Appeals For the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
05-11-01687-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016746958 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 February 26 P12:53 Lisa Matz CLERK In the Court of Appeals For the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas NEXION HEALTH AT DUNCANVILLE,
More informationMAY MARCIA J MEII4GEL, CLERK SUPREME COUR'f OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Appellee, KEVIN JOHNSON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO CASE NO. 2006-2154 -vs- Appellee, On Appeal from the Court of Appeals Twelfth Appellate District uutier county, unio KEVIN JOHNSON Appellant. COURT OF APPEALS
More information[Cite as Felice's Main Street, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2002-Ohio-5962.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Felice's Main Street, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2002-Ohio-5962.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Felice's Main Street, Inc., : Appellant-Appellee, : v. : Ohio
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MEMORANDUM OF APPELLEE VERNON D. REYNOLDS, D.O., IN RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR JLTI2ISDICTION
%fy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PHILIP A. CRAIG, NO. 14-1539 Appellant, vs. VERNON D. REYNOLDS, D.O., On Appeal from the Franklin County Court ofappeals,tenth Appellate District, Case No. 12 CV 12670
More information36 East Seventh St., Suite South Main Street
[Cite as Knop Chiropractic, Inc. v. State Farm Ins. Co., 2003-Ohio-5021.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KNOP CHIROPRACTIC, INC. -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant STATE FARM INSURANCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO BOB EVANS FARMS, INC., ET AL.
[Cite as Holland v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc., 2008-Ohio-1487.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY ROBERT E. HOLLAND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 17-07-12 v. BOB EVANS FARMS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:12-cv-02117-AT Document 17 Filed 08/30/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v.
More information{ 1} Appellant, Daniel Nevinski, appeals from the decision of the Summit County
[Cite as Nevinski v. Dunkin s Diamonds, 2010-Ohio-3004.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DANIEL B. NEVINSKI C. A. No. 24405 Appellant v. DUNKIN'S
More information[Cite as Morgan v. Kissel Bros.Shows, Inc., 2001-Ohio-2411.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES
[Cite as Morgan v. Kissel Bros.Shows, Inc., 2001-Ohio-2411.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY Jennifer Morgan, et al., : : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : : Case No. 00CA44
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. : CAROL J. APPLE, ET AL. Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO
[Cite as Apple v. Hyundai Motor Am., 2010-Ohio-949.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO : CAROL J. APPLE, ET AL. Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO. 23218 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 2006-CV-1530
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1244 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JENNIFER BAKER, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JANET COLSTON, Deceased, v. Appellant,
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO P-0079
[Cite as Ohio Cat v. A. Bonamase Leasing, Inc., 2009-Ohio-1140.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO OHIO CAT, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2007-P-0079
More informationLAW FIRM ATTORNEY NAME (Atty. Reg. No.) ATTORNEY NAME (Atty. Reg. No.) ADDRESS LINE 1 ADDRESS LINE 2 CITY, STATE ZIP PHONE NO. FAX NO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO Commented [A1]: App.R. 19(A) sets forth the pertinent information required for the cover page of a brief. CASE NO. 2018-G-0000 JANE
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as McFarren v. Emeritus at Canton, 2013-Ohio-3900.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WANDA L. MCFARREN, IND. AND AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE RINKER, DECEASED
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Chiple v. Acme Arsena Co., Inc., 2006-Ohio-5029.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87586 MICHAEL A. CHIPLE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 18, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 18, 2009 Session DONALD WAYNE ROBBINS AND JENNIFER LYNN ROBBINS, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF ALEXANDRIA LYNN ROBBINS v. PERRY COUNTY,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID SMITH, Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH SMITH, Deceased, UNPUBLISHED June 22, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 219447 Wayne Circuit Court ROBERT S
More informationCOUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO
[Cite as Anderson v. Sherwood Food Distrib., 2006-Ohio-101.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 86164 ROBERT ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant JOURNAL ENTRY and vs. OPINION SHERWOOD
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Emmert v. Mabe, 2008-Ohio-1844.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO APRIL D. EMMERT, vs. Plaintiff-Appellant, WILLIAM MABE, Administrator of the Ohio
More information[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Johnson v. Montgomery, Slip Opinion No Ohio-7445.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Johnson v. Montgomery, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7445.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Engel v. Crosby Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 180 Ohio App.3d 734, 2009-Ohio-240.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ENGEL et al., v. Appellants, CROSBY
More informationRALPH A. PESTA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY J. PESTA CITY OF PARMA, ET AL.
[Cite as Pesta v. Parma, 2009-Ohio-3060.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92363 RALPH A. PESTA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF
More informationOCTOBER 1986 LAW REVIEW REC USE LAW APPLIES TO PUBLIC LAND IN NY, NE, ID, OH, & WA. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.
REC USE LAW APPLIES TO PUBLIC LAND IN NY, NE, ID, OH, & WA James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1986 James C. Kozlowski Under a recreational use statute, the landowner owes no duty of care to recreational users
More information[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doss v. State, Slip Opinion No Ohio-5678.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doss v. State, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5678.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Lalain, 2011-Ohio-4813.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95857 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DANIEL LALAIN DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationABDELMESEH DANIAL GERALD E. LANCASTER, ET AL.
[Cite as Danial v. Lancaster, 2009-Ohio-3599.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92462 ABDELMESEH DANIAL PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. GERALD
More informationROBINSON V. BATES UPDATE: INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY LOWER COURTS
ROBINSON V. BATES UPDATE: INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION BY LOWER COURTS Todd M. Haemmerle thaemmerle@gallaghersharp.com I. A REVIEW OF THE COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE AND THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO S DECISION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2011 Session DONNA CLARK v. SPUTNIKS, LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 2008CV31663-C C.L. Rogers, Judge No. M2010-02163-COA-R3-CV
More information2:07-cv DCN Date Filed 02/20/2008 Entry Number 167 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
2:07-cv-00919-DCN Date Filed 02/20/2008 Entry Number 167 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Civil Action No.:07-cv-00919-DCN
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida. CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC12-403 CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as KY Invest. Properties, L.L.C., 2013-Ohio-1426.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, ) ) CASE NO. 12 MA 115 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
More informationLiability for criminal acts of employees
Liability for criminal acts of employees Carrie Meigs Teague Campbell Dennis & Gorham, L.L.P. KNOW YOUR LEGAL OBLIGATIONS Derivative Liability Respondeat Superior What does it mean? Let the master answer
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 18, 2017 - Case No. 2017-0087 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : : Case No. Plaintiff-Appellee, : : On Appeal from the Hamilton County vs.
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, ) CASE NOS. CR 14 588664-A, ) CR 14 591898-B, CR-15-596253-B ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE SHANNON M. GALLAGHER ) vs. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM WATERS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Watkins v. Good Samaritan Hosp. of Cincinnati, 2016-Ohio-7458.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LAGENIA WATKINS, Individually and as parent and natural
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY. Plaintiff-Appellee App. Case No
[Cite as Ballreich Bros., Inc. v. Criblez, 2010-Ohio-3263.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY BALLREICH BROS., INC Plaintiff-Appellee App. Case No. 05-09-36 v. ROGER
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Galloway v. Horkulic, 2003-Ohio-5145.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM GALLOWAY, ) ) CASE NO. 02 JE 52 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS -
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as N.A.D. v. Cleveland Metro. School Dist., 2012-Ohio-4929.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97195 N.A.D., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY
[Cite as Crum v. Huber Hts., 2013-Ohio-3271.] TIFFANY CRUM v. Plaintiff-Appellant CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY Defendant-Appellee Appellate
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as VFC Partners 18, L.L.C. v. Snider, 2014-Ohio-4129.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO VFC PARTNERS 18 LLC, SUCCESSOR BY ITS ASSIGNMENT FROM RBS CITIZENS, NA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as Bahen v. Diocese of Steubenville, 2013-Ohio-2168.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT GREGG BAHEN, ) ) CASE NO. 11 JE 34 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS - )
More informationR E^;..._. W4 ^ C) noo CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CQURT OF NIn IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO CYNTHIA GATES, et al.,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CYNTHIA GATES, et al., CASE NO. 2008-2303 vs. Plaintiffs-Appellants, ON APPEAL FROM CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA, LLC,
More information0"IO'AfAl CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO State of Ohio, ex rel. Johnny Holloway, Jr.
0"IO'AfAl IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State of Ohio, ex rel. Johnny Holloway, Jr. V. Appellee, Personnel Appeals Board, City of Huber Heights CASE NO. 2010-1972 On Appeal from the Montgomery County Court
More information3jr^ The 6upreme Court of Q bio
3jr^ The 6upreme Court of Q bio..t^^- INAL JERI LEWIS, vs. Plaintiff-Appellant, CASHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., and ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Case
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania State Police, : Bureau of Liquor Control : Enforcement, : Appellant : : v. : No. 575 C.D. 2016 : ARGUED: December 15, 2016 Jet-Set Restaurant, LLC
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Collins v. W. S. Life Ins. Co., 2008-Ohio-2054.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CONNIE COLLINS, vs. Plaintiff-Appellee, THE WESTERN SOUTHERN LIFE
More informationBY: KIRSTEN PSCHOLKA-GARTNER Suite South Park Street Mansfield, OH Mansfield, OH 44902
[Cite as State v. Williams, 2011-Ohio-1979.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- STEVEN WILLIAMS Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. W. Scott
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Bobo, 2011-Ohio-4503.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95999 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. HARRY BOBO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. MELISSA ARBINO, Case No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MELISSA ARBINO, Case No. 2006-1212 Petitioner, -vs- JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Respondents. AMICUS BRIEF OF THE OHIO CHAPTER OF THE AMERCIAN BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES IN SUPPORT
More informationF-2 PERMIT APPLICATION
TYPE OR PRINT PLAINLY Ohio Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 4005, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068-9005 - Fax No. (614) 644-6965 F-2 PERMIT APPLICATION Fee: $150.00; $160.00 if issued jointly with the holder of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO HILLARD M. ABROMS, et al.. Case Number 10-2172 Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. SYNERGY BUILDING SYSTEMS, et al. Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from the Montgomery County Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 3D BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC. Petitioner, vs. IRWIN POTASH et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-351 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 3D01-2587 BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC. Petitioner, vs. IRWIN POTASH et al., Respondents. On Discretionary Conflict Review of a
More informationJ^^N '14 7U(lq CLERK OF COURT SUPREME 9pURT OF' ph10 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME C URT FOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT CASE NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO Appellee, vs. DOUGLASFUTRALL Appellant. SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2008-2391 ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 08CA009388 LORAIN COUNTY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO GLENN SMITH ) Case No. 12-2095 vs. Appellant, ) ) On Appeal from the Franklin County Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate District CRAIG BARCLAY, ET AL. ) Court Of Appeals
More informationF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION. - r,'jijqca COUNTY MOTION TO DENY v. DEFENDANTS JOSEPH H.
IN C=T 1005 AUG -9 A c~ 3 4 ROSIE ANDUJAR, et al. F COMMON PLEAS COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION 'DLO OF FUERST CASE NO. : 05-CV-565095 Plaintiffs, ~ ERK OF COURTS JUDGE STUART FRIEDMAN - r,'jijqca COUNTY
More information