Jn tbt jfiftb 1ai~ttitt QCourt of ~peaiiatral&iiwitrtcr
|
|
- Monica Gibbs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 tz<-..,,jj" c[n~~~llpp{tt, NO CV JUL LISA MATz Jn tbt jfiftb 1ai~ttitt QCourt of ~peaiiatral&iiwitrtcr WEIR BROS. INC., Appellant, v. LONGVIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORTATION, BOB METZLER, DAVID HOUSTON, DONNY STUCKEY, DAN DROEGE, RICHARD ANDREWS, WILLIAM MILLER, GAYLON BUTLER AND STEVE METCALF, Appellees. On appeal from Cause No , Pending in the 191 st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT July 27,2011 Mark A. Herndon State Bar No Luna Road Dallas, Texas Tel Fac. Attorney for Appellant
2 Identity of Parties and Their Counsel Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.l(a) and 38.2(a)(l)(A), the following are the parties to the trial court's judgment being appealed and their counsel: 1. Appellant 2. Counsel for Appellant 3. Appellees/Cross-Appellants 4. Counsel for Appellees 5. Trial Judge Weir Bros. Inc. Mark A. Herndon (trial and appellate counsel) Luna Road Dallas, Texas Longview Economic Development Corporation, Bob Metzler, David Houston, Donny Stuckey, Dan Droege, Richard Andrews, William Miller, Gaylon Butler and Steve Metcalf Jason L. Wren (appellate counsel) Jerry L. Ewing, Jr. (trial and appellate counsel) Walters, Balido & Crain, LLP Founders Square 900 Jackson Street, Suite 600 Dallas, Texas The Honorable Gena Slaughter, Presiding Judge of the 191 st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Definitions. The following capitalized terms will be ascribed the following meanings: "Weir Bros." means Appellant Weir Bros. Inc.; "LEDCO" means Longview Economic Development Corporation; "Board of Directors" means the individual Appellees, collectively; and "Trial Court" means Gena Slaughter, Presiding Judge of the 191 st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. 11
3 Table of Contents Identity of Parties and Their Counsel.... ii Table of Contents... iii Table of Authorities... iv Statement of the Case... 1 Statement Regarding Oral Argument... 1 Issues for Review... 1 Statement of Facts... 2 Summary of the Argument... 4 Argument and Authorities Standard of Review The Trial Court Erred by Granting the Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to LEDCO The Trial Court Erred by Granting the Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to the individual members oft he Board of Directors The Trial Court was correct in dismissing the claims against LEDCO and the Board of Directors without prejudice... 7 Conclusion and Prayer... 8 Certificate of Service... 9 l1l
4 Table of Authorities Cases Bland Ind. School Dist. v. Blue, 34 S. W.3d 547, 555 (Tex. 2000)... 7 City of Gladewater v. Pike, 727 S. W.2d 514 (Tex. 1987)... 5 City of Lancaster v. Chambers, 883 S. W.2d 650 (Tex. 1994)... 6 City of Waco v. Hester, 805 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.App.-Waco1990, writ den.)... 6 Dilley v. City of Houston, 148 Tex.191, 222 S.W.2d 992 (1949)... 5 State v. Terrell, 588 S.W.2d 784 (Tex. 1979)... 6 Texas A&M University System v. Koseoglu, 233 S. W.3d 835 (Tex. 2007)... 7 Texas Natural Res. Conservation Comm'n v. IT-Davy, 74 S. W.3d 849 (Tex. 2002)... 4 Turvey v. City of Houston, 602 S. W.2d 517 (Tex. 1980)... 5 Other Authorities Op. Att'y Gen. JM Section , Tex. Gov. Code... 2 Section 15.05(a), Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code... 1, 3 Section 15.21(a), Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code... l, 3 Section , Tex. Local Gov. Code... 4 Texas Development Corporation Act, Section , et seq, Tex. Local Gov. Code... 3 lv
5 Statement of the Case This appeal arises from the Trial Court's granting of Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction filed in Cause No , Weir Bros. Inc. v. Longview Economic Development Corporation, et al, Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. C.R Weir Bros. causes of action are against LEDCO and the individual members of the Board of Directors of LEDCO for violation of the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act (included in Chapter 15 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code and referred to herein as the "Texas Free Enterprise Act"), fraud and breach of contract for failing to disclose, and then applying, a local preference in connection with a publicly advertised bid for a construction project and awarding that bid to the fourth lowest responsive bidder. C.R The Trial Court granted Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to LEDCO on July 28, 2010, and, on August 16, 2010, included the Board of Directors. C.R. 152 and A notice of appeal was filed by Weir Bros. on September 3, C.R Statement Regarding Oral Argument No oral argument is requested pursuant to Local Rule 7. Weir Bros. believes that this case can be decided on the basis of the Court Record ("C.R.") and briefs. Issues for Review Weir Bros. appeal presents the following issues for the Court's review: (1) whether the Trial Court properly granted Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to LEDCO, and (2) whether the Trial Court properly granted Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to the individual members of the Board of Directors. Appellees, as Cross-Appellants, presented the following issue for the Court's review: whether the Trial Court properly dismissed the claims against LEDCO and the Board of
6 Directors without prejudice. Statement of Facts Weir Bros. is a construction company engaged in the construction of public and private projects, as both a prime contractor and subcontractor. C. R.144. LEDCO publicly advertised for bid the North Business Park, Phase 1 Project ("Project"), located in Longview, Texas. C.R.144. In connection with the bidding process for the Project, Appellees adopted and rigorously followed the competitive sealed proposal method for public entities (other than disclosure of the local preference), as generally described in Section of the Tex. Gov. Code. C.R In accordance with that method, LEDCO published public notices for bidding on the Project and distributed construction documents, selection criteria, project scope, schedule and other information on the Project, including bonding requirements and the procedure for collecting sealed bids and for publicly opening and reading those bids (collectively, "Request for Proposal"). C.R Under the competitive sealed proposal method adopted and followed by LEDCO, LEDCO was required to state in the Request for Proposal all of the selection criteria to be used in selecting the successful contractor to perform the work. C.R.144 In determining best value for LEDCO, LEDCO was not restricted to considering price alone, but could consider any other valid factor expressly stated as selection criteria in the Request for Proposal. C.R.144. Nowhere was a local preference mentioned in the Request for Proposal. C.R Weir Bros. responded to the public advertising for the Project, obtained the Request for Proposal and submitted a fully responsive bid on the Project. C.R When the bids on the Project were publicly opened and read on March 19, 2009, Weir Bros. was the lowest responsive bidder. C.R
7 LEDCO and the Board of Directors then formed the Construction Committee of the Board of Directors and recommended that the Project be awarded to East Texas Bridge, Inc., a local Longview contractor who was the 4th lowest responsive bidder. C.R The three lowest responsive bidders were from Dallas, Mesquite and Sulphur Springs, Texas. C.R Based upon the recommendation of the Construction Committee of the Board of Directors, which was unanimously approved, on March 25, 2009, by the Board of Directors, LEDCO awarded the Project to the 4th lowest responsive bidder, based upon the undisclosed selection criteria of "local contractor", despite the fact that the local contractor's bid exceeded Appellant's qualified and responsive bid by $182, C.R The Board of Directors and LEDCO acted in bad faith and with a corrupt motive by forming a Construction Committee of the Board of Directors in order to disguise their intent and surreptitiously scheme to improperly award the Project to a local Longview contractor, by applying an undisclosed local preference. C.R The application of this secret and clearly determinative selection criteria in the award process demonstrates that the actions by the individual members of the Board of Directors were in bad faith and contrary to their lawful authority. C.R Weir Bros. asserts causes of action for prohibited restraint of trade in violation of Sections 15.05(a) and 15.21(a) of the Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code (the operative provisions of the Texas Free Enterprise Act for private actions), fraud and breach of contract. C.R LEDCO, a Texas development corporation organized under the Development Corporation Act of 1979 (now Section , et seq., Tex. Local Gov. Code) and its individual 3
8 members of the Board of Directors, 1 assert governmental immunity as an absolute bar to all of the claims made by Weir Bros. Summary of the Argument Weir Bros. contends that it is entitled to submit appropriate issues in the Trial Court on whether or not the actions of LEDCO and the Board of Directors exceeded the bounds of governmental immunity protection, as well as whether any of them engaged in a proprietary function. Favorable findings on either of these issues preclude the successful assertion of governmental immunity as an absolute bar to Weir Bros. claims. Alternatively, the pleadings and extrinsic evidence should be considered by the Trial Court to determine whether Weir Bros. pleadings can be cured by amendment. Argument and Authorities 1. Standard of Review. The Trial Court's ruling on Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction is a legal question, subject to this Court's review under a de novo standard. Texas Natural Res. Conservation Comm 'n v. IT-Davy, 74 S. W3d 849, 855 (I'ex. 2002). 2. The Trial Court Erred by Granting the Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to LEDCO. LEDCO's governmental immunity is derived from Section ofthe Tex. Local Gov. Code. That provision is expressly limited by actions which are "governmental functions." Weir Bros. has alleged that the protection of local contractors, by applying an undisclosed local preference selection criteria, cannot be considered a governmental function. C.R Weir Bros. concurs with Appellees' statement in footnote 3 of Appellees' Brief, on page 3, that one of the members of the Board of Directors (Vernon Stanmore) was named and served prior to the Trial Court's ruling on the Plea to the Jurisdiction. Since Mr. Stanmore had not answered, in order to expedite this appeal, he was nonsuited by Weir Bros. without prejudice. 4
9 None of the cases cited by Appellees stand for the proposition that the existence of a governmental function (assuming that the development of a business park is a governmental function) cloaks all the willful, bad faith and malicious actions taken by LEDCO related in any respect to the development of a business park from all liability for those improper actions. No Texas case has taken governmental immunity to those depths. Weir Bros. believes that it is entitled to a jury issue on whether the actions taken by LEDCO in protecting a purely local interest (local contractors), when coupled with the intentional failure to disclose that information to prospective bidders, rise to the level of an actionable, proprietary activity. With respect to Weir Bros. tort and contract claims, Weir Bros. can establish waiver of governmental immunity by pleading and proving that LEDCO was involved in a proprietary activity. Turvey v. City of Houston, 602 S. W2d 517 (Tex. 1980). The surreptitious protection of local contractors for the construction of a local business park through a rigged bidding process cannot be a proper governmental activity. A proprietary function is one a local governmental entity performs, in its discretion, primarily for the benefit of those within its local jurisdictional limits, rather than for the general public. City of Gladewater v. Pike, 727 S. W2d 514, 519 (Tex. 1987). As a derivative of sovereign immunity, governmental immunity necessarily requires that the interest of the state (all Texas contractors), as opposed to local interests (local contractors), be the subject of the activity. When a municipality commits a tort while engaged in a proprietary function, it is liable to the same extent as a private entity or individual. Dilley v. City of Houston, 148 Tex. 191, 193, 222 S.W2d 992, 993 (1949). 5
10 3. The Trial Court Erred by Granting the Plea to the Jurisdiction with respect to the individual members of the Board of Directors. Weir Bros. requests this Court determine the boundaries within which the members of the Board of Directors must act in order to prevail upon their contention that their activity is a protected governmental function, with all claims against them barred by governmental immunity. Simply awarding the bid on the Project is not the activity the subject of Weir Bros. complaint. The bidding procedure, governed and controlled by an undisclosed local preference selection criteria, and the award, based on that unfair procedure, is the issue. Appellees contend that there is no limitation on governmental immunity as long as the wrongdoing bears some tenuous relationship to a proper governmental function. 2 The only authority located by Weir Bros. which addressed the Texas Free Enterprise Act and governmental immunity is Op. Att'y Gen. JM-404. In this Attorney General Opinion, the boundary line is crossed when malicious and willful actions are proven. All Weir Bros. asks this Court to determine with respect to the members of the Board of Directors are (i) what jury finding is sufficient to trump their claim of governmental immunity and provide Weir Bros. with the opportunity to present that issue to a jury, and (ii) whether their actions were proprietary or governmental. 2 City of Lancaster v. Chambers, 883 S. W.2d 650, 654 (Tex. /994) (government employees entitled to official immunity when perfonning discretionary duties in good faith within scope of authority); State v. Terrell, 588 S. W.2d 784, (Tex. 1979) (highway patrolman's driving decisions outside scope of policy directives not covered by immunity); and City Waco v. Hester, 805 S. W.2d 807, (Tex.App-Waco /990, writ den.) (failing to follow city policy requiring segregation of inmates waived immunity because acts constituted negligent implementation of policy rather than formulation). 6
11 There necessarily must be bright line which cannot be crossed by individuals purporting to act in an official capacity without losing governmental immunity? Otherwise, the limitation on the grant of immunity by the inclusion of the phrase "governmental function" is meaningless. See, e.g., Sections (a) and (b) (the introductory paragraphs of each section), Tex. Local Gov. Code. 4. The Trial Court was correct in dismissing the claims against LEDCO and the Board of Directors without prejudice. The issue of whether the Trial Court's order should have been "with prejudice" or "without prejudice" is determined by whether or not Weir Bros. can amend its petition in the Trial Court to preclude the jurisdictional bar of governmental immunity to all of its claims. University System v. Koseoglu, 233 S. W3d 835, 840 (Tex. 2007). Texas A&M The 1ssue becomes one of whether Weir Bros. claims are incurably defective. Id at 839. Weir Bros. sued the members of the Board of Directors, individually, in their capacities as directors. Based upon the alleged willful, bad faith and malicious actions of the Board of Directors in secretly applying a local preference, actions clearly beyond any concept of "governmental function" recognized by Texas courts, this Court may determine that certain individual members of the Board of Directors can be sued personally for the individual bad faith actions of such individual members of the Board of Directors proven by Weir Bros. In this instance, Weir Bros. pleadings are not fatally defective and could be cured by an amended petition limiting 3 lf governmental immunity was truly as pervasive as Appellees suggest, there would be no need for governmental entities to obtain fidelity bonds and directors' and officers' insurance, as they routinely do. As embraced in Bland Ind. School Dist. v. Blue, 34 S. W3d 547, 555 (Tex. 2000), the Trial Court can consider extrinsic evidence and, in fact, must do so where jurisdiction is the issue and the pleadings do not clearly resolve this jurisdictional issue. 7
12 its claims to those individuals. Should the Trial Court's order be "with prejudice", it would preclude Weir Bros. from exercising its established right to amend its pleadings. There is no evidence that the Trial Court analyzed whether or not any pleading defect could be cured. Accordingly, the Trial Court's dismissal without prejudice preserves Weir Bros. right to amend its pleadings. Conclusion and Prayer Appellant prays that the Trial Court's order granting Appellees' Plea to the Jurisdiction be reversed, and this case be remanded to the Trial Court for trial, with instructions for the jury issues necessary to overcome a bar to Appellant's claims based upon governmental immunity. Alternatively, Appellant should be afforded the opportunity to amend its pleadings in order to cure any existing defects. Respectfully submitted, State Bar No Luna Road Dallas, Texas TELEPHONE FACSIMILE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 8
13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE om J This is to certify that a true and correct copy of this instrument has been served upon all counsel of record, via facsimile, on this the 27'h day l. MARK A. HERNDON 9
14 TPANSMI::srm~ VEPIFICATIOI'l PEPOPT TIME 07/27/ :1S ~~AME FAX TEL SEP.# EPOM8J8S5453 DATE, TIME FAX ~10. / ~~AME DUPATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 07/27 15: :01:52 13 OK STAI'lDARD ECM
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-10-00394-CV BOBIE KENNETH TOWNSEND, Appellant V. MONTGOMERY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 359th District Court
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00455-CV Canario s, Inc., Appellant v. City of Austin, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-13-003779,
More informationFIFTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 05-11-01327-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016716717 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 February 7 P7:40 Lisa Matz CLERK In The FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS Dallas, Texas Edmund Sanchez, M.D. and Henry B. Randall,
More informationCAUSE NO CV FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS INWOOD ON THE PARK, APPELLANT, STEPHANIE MORRIS AND ALL OCCUPANTS,
CAUSE NO. 05-11-01042-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016539672 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 October 12 A9:39 Lisa Matz CLERK FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS INWOOD ON THE PARK, APPELLANT,
More informationNUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING, BERNARDINO PEDRAZA JR.,
NUMBER 13-11-00068-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG TEXAS STATE BOARD OF NURSING, Appellants, v. BERNARDINO PEDRAZA JR., Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00678-CV Darnell Delk, Appellant v. The Honorable Rosemary Lehmberg, District Attorney and The Honorable Robert Perkins, Judge, Appellees FROM
More informationIN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CV. From the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 26,407 MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00102-CV THE CITY OF CALDWELL, TEXAS, v. PAUL LILLY, Appellant Appellee From the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 26,407 MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationCAUSE NO GINGER WEATHERSPOON, IN THE 44 th -B JUDICIAL. Defendant. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT S PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION
CAUSE NO. 09-06233 Filed 10 August 23 P12:26 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District GINGER WEATHERSPOON, IN THE 44 th -B JUDICIAL Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT COURT OF OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant/Appellant,
NO. 05-10-00727-CV ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. MAURYA LYNN PATRICK, Plaintiff/Appellee.
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01289-CV WEST FORK ADVISORS, LLC, Appellant V. SUNGARD CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC AND SUNGARD
More informationTHE PROMPT PAYMENT ACT AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
THE PROMPT PAYMENT ACT AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Texas City Attorney s Association Newsletter Jeffrey S. Chapman FORD NASSEN & BALDWIN P.C. 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1010 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 236-0009
More informationCause No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant
Cause No. 05-09-00640-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant v. CURTIS LEO BAGGETT and BART BAGGETT, Appellees Appealed from the
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00197-CV City of Garden Ridge, Texas, Appellant v. Curtis Ray, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-2004-1131A,
More informationNO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS. LA PROVIDENCIA FOOD PRODUCTS, CO. and ROBERTO MEZA, Individually, Appellants
NO. 05-10-00709 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS LA PROVIDENCIA FOOD PRODUCTS, CO. and ROBERTO MEZA, Individually, Appellants V. SUPER PLAZA STORES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. TERRY RAY JAMES, Appellant, LUPE VALDEZ, ET AL, Appellee.
NO.05-11-01506-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016747534 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 February 27 A10:53 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS TERRY RAY
More informationCAUSE NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS -DALLAS, TEXAS. ANGELA NOLAN Appellant
CAUSE NO. 05-10-00481-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS -DALLAS, TEXAS ANGELA NOLAN Appellant DENNIS HUGHES, operating under assumed name Rolando s Mexican Grill a/k/a/
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Appellant s Motion for Rehearing Overruled; Opinion of August 13, 2015 Withdrawn; Reversed and Rendered and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed November 10, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO.
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Reversed and Rendered and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 15, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00823-CV TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND TED HOUGHTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 09-0369 444444444444 GLENN COLQUITT, PETITIONER, v. BRAZORIA COUNTY, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. ESTER WILLIAMS AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants
ACCEPTED 225EFJ016447104 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 August 14 P9:04 Lisa Matz CLERK NO. 05-11-00434-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS ESTER WILLIAMS AND/OR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. 16-0890 SHAMROCK PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC, P.A., PETITIONER, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KYLE JANEK, MD, EXECUTIVE COMMISSIONER AND DOUGLAS WILSON, INSPECTOR
More informationA Texas Framework For Extending The Economic Loss Rule
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Texas Framework For Extending The Economic Loss
More informationNo CV IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
No. 05-10-01150-CV IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 7/11/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk SHIDEH SHARIFI, as Independent Executor of the ESTATE OF GHOLAMREZA SHARIFI,
More informationNUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI EDINBURG
NUMBER 13-17-00447-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI EDINBURG COUNTY OF HIDALGO, Appellant, v. MARY ALICE PALACIOS Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. No CV. HAMILTON GUARANTY CAPITAL, LLC, Appellant,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS No. 05-11-01401-CV 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/08/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk HAMILTON GUARANTY CAPITAL, LLC, Appellant, v. ORPHAN
More informationCV. In the Court of Appeals For the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
05-11-01687-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016746958 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 February 26 P12:53 Lisa Matz CLERK In the Court of Appeals For the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas NEXION HEALTH AT DUNCANVILLE,
More informationMEMORANDUM OPINION. No CV. KILLAM RANCH PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellant. WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00105-CV KILLAM RANCH PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellant v. WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CVQ-001710-D3
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00287-CV CITY OF FRITCH, APPELLANT V. KIRK COKER, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 84th District Court Hutchinson County, Texas Trial
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 6, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-00877-CV THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE, Appellee
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00475-CV Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom, Appellant v. Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E., Individually and in his Official Capacity as Executive
More informationZACHRY CONSTRUCTION v. PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY
ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION v. PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY R. Douglas Rees Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 214-712 712-9500 214-712 712-9540 Fax Doug.rees@cooperscully.com
More informationNO CV. LARRY E. POTTER, Appellant. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Appellee
Opinion issued July 2, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-07-00578-CV LARRY E. POTTER, Appellant V. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District
More informationNo CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant/Appellant, MAURYA PATRICK,
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED No. 05-10-00727-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. MAURYA PATRICK, Plaintiff/Appellee. REPLY BRIEF
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-207-CV LASHUN RICHARDSON APPELLANT V. FOSTER & SEAR, L.L.P., ATTORNEYS AT LAW AND SCOTT W. WERT ------------ APPELLEES FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00242-CV Billy Ross Sims, Appellant v. Jennifer Smith and Celia Turner, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationNo CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. R.J. SUAREZ ENTERPRISES, INC. Appellant / Cross-Appellee
No. 05-11-00934-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016760221 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 March 5 P12:50 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS R.J. SUAREZ ENTERPRISES,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-374-CV CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS AND ALISON TURNER APPELLANTS MARK ALLEN RANDALL V. ------------ APPELLEE FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. JJW DEVELOPMENT, LLC and JOHN J. WINGFILED, JR.
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED NO. 05-10-01359-CV 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 8/19/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS JJW DEVELOPMENT, LLC and JOHN J. WINGFILED,
More informationCourt of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-10-00155-CV CARROL THOMAS, BEAUMONT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND WOODROW REECE, Appellants V. BEAUMONT HERITAGE SOCIETY AND EDDIE
More information2018COA151. A division of the Colorado Court of Appeals considers the. district court s dismissal of a pretrial detainee s allegations that she
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0437 444444444444 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PETITIONER, v. JOSE LUIS PERCHES, SR. AND ALMA DELIA PERCHES, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant V. D.R. HORTON TEXAS, LTD.
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed July 10, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01414-CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant V. D.R. HORTON TEXAS, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 116th
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued February 23, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-15-00163-CV XIANGXIANG TANG, Appellant V. KLAUS WIEGAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 268th District Court
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00146-CV ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. APPELLANT V. THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS EL PASO COUNTY, Appellant, v. HERLINDA ALVARADO, Appellee. O P I N I O N No. 08-07-00351-CV Appeal from the 327th District Court of El Paso County,
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 7, 2009 STEVE ASHBURN, APPELLANT
NO. 07-07-0443-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 7, 009 STEVE ASHBURN, APPELLANT V. SPENCER CAVINESS, APPELLEE FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1 OF
More informationIn the Fifth District Court of Appeals At Dallas
NO. 05-11-01144-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016580482 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 7 P1:43 Lisa Matz CLERK In the Fifth District Court of Appeals At Dallas DALLAS METROCARE SERVICES, Appellant,
More informationNO CV HOUSTON DIVISION LAWRENCE C. MATHIS, Appellant. vs. DCR MORTGAGE III SUB I, LLC, Appellee
NO. 14-15-00026-CV ACCEPTED 14-15-00026-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/15/2015 7:55:45 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN FOR THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 17-1060 444444444444 IN RE HOUSTON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00478-CV City of San Angelo, Appellant v. Terrell Terry Smith, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationNO v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT CITY OF HOUSTON S PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION
6/20/2017 4:41 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 17735728 By: Tammy Tolman Filed: 6/20/2017 4:41 PM NO. 2017-36216 HOUSTON FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF AND RETIREMENT FUND, Plaintiff,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Reverse and Render; Opinion Filed July 6, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01221-CV THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant V. CHARLES WAYNE
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00555-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellant v. Angela Bonser-Lain; Karin Ascott, as next friend on behalf of T.V.H. and A.V.H.,
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 29, 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF
NO. 07-08-0292-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 29, 2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF CYNTHIA RUDNICK HUGHES AND RODNEY FANE HUGHES FROM THE 16TH
More informationUSA MATZ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS CLERK 5th DISTRICT FIFTH CICUIT OF TEXAS LOCATED AT DALLAS NO CR. The State of Texas, Appellee
RECEIVED IN COURi OF APPEALS 1 5th DIST, MAR 0 9 2011 USA MATZ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS CLERK 5th DISTRICT FIFTH CICUIT OF TEXAS LOCATED AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 3/15/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. No CV. EVAN LANE VAN SHAW, Appellant. MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY CO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS No. 05-10-00642-CV EVAN LANE VAN SHAW, Appellant v. MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY CO., Appellee TRIAL CAUSE NO. CC-09-08193-E ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. LAFAYETTE ESCADRILLE, INC., Appellant V. CITY CREDIT UNION, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 9, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-01439-CV LAFAYETTE ESCADRILLE, INC., Appellant V. CITY CREDIT UNION, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationNo CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS
No. 05-10-00446-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS Davie C. Westmoreland, agent for International Fidelity Insurance Company, Appellant v. State of Texas, Appellee Brief
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. DENNIS GENE WRIGHT, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05-09-00421-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS DENNIS GENE WRIGHT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBERS 2008-1-922 FROM THE COUNTY COURT
More informationReverse in part; Affirm in part; and Remand; Opinion Filed May 5, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.
Reverse in part; Affirm in part; and Remand; Opinion Filed May 5, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00864-CV JOHNATHAN HALTON AND CAROLYN HALTON, Appellants V. AMERICAN
More informationNUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG THE CITY OF PHARR, TEXAS,
NUMBER 13-15-00133-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG THE CITY OF PHARR, TEXAS, Appellant, v. DORA HERRERA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF REYNALDO
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS CONSTABLE LUIS AGUILAR, Appellant, v. ALFONSO FRIAS, Appellee. No. 08-11-00202-CV Appeal from the 346 th District Court of El Paso County, Texas
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued August 25, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-06-00490-CV THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. STEPHEN BARTH, Appellee On Appeal from the 113th District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0686 444444444444 TEXAS ADJUTANT GENERAL S OFFICE, PETITIONER, v. MICHELE NGAKOUE, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION
More informationNO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. JOSEPH MICHAEL DEMERS, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
NO. 05-11-01704-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 04/05/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk JOSEPH MICHAEL DEMERS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Affirmed; Opinion Filed February 14, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00861-CV TDINDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant V. MY THREE SONS, LTD., MY THREE SONS MANAGEMENT,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS. No CV O P I N I O N
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS IN RE: LETICIA RIVAS-LUNA, RELATOR O P I N I O N No. 08-16-00312-CV AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS Leticia Rivas-Luna has filed a mandamus petition
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00409-CV BARBARA LOUISE MORTON D/B/A TIMARRON COLLEGE PREP APPELLANT V. TIMARRON OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 96TH
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00322-CV DAVID K. NORVELLE AND SYLVIA D. NORVELLE APPELLANTS V. PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION APPELLEE ---------FROM
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00364-CV DAVIE C. WESTMORELAND D/B/A ALLEGHENY CASUALTY CO. BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT V. RICK STARNES D/B/A STARNES & ASSOCIATES AND
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96000 PROVIDENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, Respondent. PARIENTE, J. [May 24, 2001] REVISED OPINION We have for review a decision of
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00250-CV Alexandra Krot and American Homesites TX, LLC, Appellants v. Fidelity National Title Company, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS
More informationIN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CR No CR
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15-00133-CR No. 10-15-00134-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, v. LOUIS HOUSTON JARVIS, JR. AND JENNIFER RENEE JONES, Appellant Appellees From the County Court at Law No. 1 McLennan
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00156-CV Amanda Baird; Peter Torres; and Peter Torres, Jr., P.C., Appellants v. Margaret Villegas and Tom Tourtellotte, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00312-CV Dr. Rudoulf Michael Metz, Appellant v. Lake LBJ Municipal Utility District; Llano Independent School District; County Education District
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. JOHN MUKORO, Appellant, vs. BRIDGET MYERS, Appellee.
NO. 05-10-00856-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS JOHN MUKORO, Appellant, vs. BRIDGET MYERS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 192 ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
More informationNO. TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. DEMARCUS ANTONIO TAYLOR, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee ***************
NO. TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS PD-1674-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/28/2015 11:45:34 AM Accepted 12/28/2015 2:22:15 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK DEMARCUS ANTONIO TAYLOR,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DFW ADVISORS LTD. CO., Appellant V. JACQUELINE ERVIN, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 11, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00883-CV DFW ADVISORS LTD. CO., Appellant V. JACQUELINE ERVIN, Appellee On Appeal from
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REMAND NO. 03-05-00786-CV Emory B. Perry, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee, David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00900-CV THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. LARRY EDGAR ESTRADA AND MAYER BROWN, L.L.P., F/K/A MAYER, BROWN,
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 1124 Filed 12/16/11 Entered 12/16/11 17:31:17 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Main Document Page 1 of 9 Jerry C. Alexander State Bar No. 00993500 Christopher A. Robison State Bar No. 24035720 PASSMAN & JONES, A Professional Corporation 1201 Elm Street, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75270-2500
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. 17-0329 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, PETITIONER, v. LORI ANNAB, RESPONDENT ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS Argued March
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-349-CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.I.L., A CHILD ------------ FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ------------
More informationCAUSE NO CR THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT DALLAS, TEXAS KIMBERLY SHERVON GARRETT, APPELLANT,
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED CAUSE NO. 05-08-01288-CR THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT DALLAS, TEXAS KIMBERLY SHERVON GARRETT, APPELLANT, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE. CRIMINAL DISTRICT
More informationDEFENDANT S 1st AMENDED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE files this his Defendant s
WWWWWWWWW FILED: 12/4/201712:00 12:00 AM SHERRI ADELSTEIN Denton County District Clerk By: Velia Duong, Deputy JESSICA VIDRINE Plaintiff, v. DR. RYAN DANIEL Defendant. CAUSE NO.: 17-8460-431 IN THE DISTRICT
More informationCAUSE NO. IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO., AGENT GLENN STRICKLAND DBA A-1 BONDING CO., VS.
CAUSE NO. PD-0642&0643&0644-18 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/21/2018 12:21 PM Accepted 6/21/2018 12:41 PM DEANA WILLIAMSON CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS INTERNATIONAL
More informationNUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
NUMBER 13-16-00318-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG BBVA COMPASS A/K/A COMPASS BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF TEXAS STATE BANK, Appellant, v. ADOLFO VELA AND LETICIA
More informationREPLY OF APPELLANT, DIMP POWELL
E-Filed Document May 7 2014 17:34:51 2013-EC-00928-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-TS-00928 DIMP POWELL, V. MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION, APPELLANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 6, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00741-CV DENNIS TOPLETZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR OF HAROLD TOPLETZ D/B/A TOPLETZ
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed March 23, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-01018-CV LT. KENNETH MILLER, Appellant V. CITY OF HOUSTON AND HAROLD HURTT, Appellee On Appeal from
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. SHERYL JOHNSON-TODD, Appellant V. JOHN S. MORGAN, Appellee NO CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT SHERYL JOHNSON-TODD, Appellant V. JOHN S. MORGAN, Appellee NO. 09-15-00210-CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, NINTH DISTRICT, BEAUMONT 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 11078 October 29, 2015, Opinion
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 28, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 28, 2009 Session MICHAEL SOWELL v. ESTATE OF JAMES W. DAVIS An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 8350 Clayburn Peeples, Judge No.
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00771-CV David M. DUNLOP, Appellant v. John D. DELOACH, Individual, John David DeLoach d/b/a Bexar Towing, and 2455 Greenway Office
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant
Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed April 9, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00653-CV BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant V. TCI LUNA VENTURES, LLC AND
More informationNO CV. The Court of Appeals. For The Fourth District of Texas. At San Antonio
NO. 04-14-00354-CV ACCEPTED 04-14-00354-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/21/2015 12:53:43 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK The Court of Appeals For The Fourth District of Texas At San Antonio KEITH
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 30, 2018 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 30, 2018 Session 09/24/2018 RAFIA NAFEES KHAN v. REGIONS BANK Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 194115-2 Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr.,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- CASEY WELBORN, v. Petitioner,
More informationCourt of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. Bill McLaren Jr., Appellant, v. Microsoft Corporation, Appellee. No CV. May 28, 1999.
NOTICE: NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER TEX.R.APP.P. 47.7 UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS MAY NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. Bill McLaren Jr., Appellant, v. Microsoft Corporation,
More informationNOS CR; CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS. COURTNI SCHULZ, Appellant. vs.
NOS. 05-12-00299-CR; 05-12-00300-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/26/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURTNI SCHULZ, Appellant vs.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS BANK OF NEW YORK f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC. ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9, v.
More information