NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 November 2012
|
|
- Philomena Lynch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e. NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 6 November 2012 THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER JAMES WATSON, TOMMIE PURYER WATSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, Plaintiff, v. Franklin County No. 10 CVS 1262 DAVID JAMES KING, M.D. and TRIANGLE MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A. d/b/a LOUISBURG INTERNAL MEDICINE, Defendants. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 22 December 2011 by Judge Robert H. Hobgood in Franklin County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 October Bryant Duke Paris III, P.L.L.C., by Bryant Duke Paris III, for plaintiff appellant. Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P., by Kathrine E. Fisher and John W. Minier, for defendants appellees. MARTIN, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Tommie Puryear 1 Watson ( Mrs. Watson ), as the 1 Although the caption on the order from which plaintiff appeals indicates that her maiden name is Puryer, the record reflects
2 -2- administratrix of the estate of her late husband Christopher James Watson ( Mr. Watson ), appeals from the trial court s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants David James King, M.D. ( Dr. King ) and Triangle Medical Clinic, P.A. d/b/a Louisburg Internal Medicine ( Louisburg Internal Medicine ), and dismissing plaintiff s complaint with prejudice. We affirm. On 16 May 2006, Mr. Watson visited Dr. King at Louisburg Internal Medicine seeking treatment for recurring lower back pain that Mr. Watson suffered as a result of an injury he is alleged to have sustained ten years prior. Upon the conclusion of his examination, Dr. King diagnosed Mr. Watson with low back pain and prescribed 5 milligrams of Percocet four times a day as needed for pain. On this same day, Mr. Watson signed a Pain Management Agreement, in which he agreed, among other things, to use [his] medicine at a rate no greater than the prescribed rate and that use of [his] medicine at a greater rate [would] result in [his] being without medication for a period of time. Mr. Watson returned to Dr. King on 16 June, 20 July, and 14 August 2006 complaining of continued low back pain, for which Dr. King prescribed the same Percocet dosage at each successive visit. Mr. Watson then returned to Dr. King one week after his that her name is Puryear.
3 -3-14 August appointment to request a different medication because the Percocet was failing ; Dr. King discontinued the Percocet and instead prescribed 10 milligrams of methadone four times a day as needed for pain. Mr. Watson continued to visit Dr. King monthly throughout fall 2006 for his low back pain which, according to Dr. King s medical notes, still hurt[] like H _ and Dr. King continued to prescribe the same methadone dosage at each successive visit. About two days before Mr. Watson s 13 December 2006 appointment with Dr. King, Mrs. Watson telephoned Dr. King s office to report that she thought there was a problem with her husband s prescription medications counteracting [sic] with each other, because she started noticing differences in her husband s sleeping and eating habits, and because his speech was sometimes slurred and his mobility slowed. When Mr. Watson returned home from his 13 December appointment with another prescription for the same dosage of methadone as was prescribed in the months prior Mr. Watson told his wife that Dr. King had said that an anonymous caller contacted his office to report that Mr. Watson was abusing his medicine. When Mrs. Watson told her husband that she had called Dr. King s office, Mr. Watson denied that he was abusing his prescription medication. Mrs. Watson then told her husband that, when she looked in the
4 -4- bottle for the prior month s methadone prescription, she determined that what he should have had in the bottle was not what he had in the bottle. In response, Mr. Watson offered, Well, some of [the methadone pills] are at work in my tool bag. I don t take the bottle to work. And so that s why there s not as many in here as there should be. According to Mrs. Watson, [t]hat satisfied [her] as far as [her] thinking maybe [Mr. Watson] wasn t really wasn t abusing [the methadone]. Because Mr. Watson wanted Dr. King to continue to be his doctor, and because her husband implied that Dr. King would only be his doctor if he, you know, like he knew that [Mr. Watson] wasn t abusing his drugs, the day before her husband s next monthly appointment with Dr. King, Mrs. Watson visited Dr. King s office to speak with Dr. King in person. During this meeting, Mrs. Watson says she told Dr. King that, when she contacted his office in December, she had not reported that her husband was abusing his medication, but said only that there was something wrong, and [she] didn t know if it was the medicines, one of the medicines, all the medicines. According to Dr. King s notes regarding this meeting with Mrs. Watson notes that are only partially legible because they were later scribbled through Dr. King noted: Wife changed her mind... her prev. message for me on She now thinks her
5 -5- husband is not abusing meds. OK to not refer pt to pain clinic. When Mr. Watson returned home the next day from his 10 January 2007 appointment with Dr. King, he brought with him a different prescription for methadone, one which increased his daily dosage of methadone from 40 milligrams to 50 milligrams. Thus, while each of Mr. Watson s prior prescriptions for methadone were written for 124 ten-milligram tablets, 2 to accommodate the increased prescription dosage of an additional 10 milligrams per day, the prescription Mr. Watson received from Dr. King on 10 January was written for 155 ten-milligram tablets. On 17 January 2007, Mr. Watson woke up at 4:00 a.m., as he did each morning, took his medication, and went to work. At 10:00 a.m., Mr. Watson s boss telephoned Mrs. Watson to let her know that he was going to take Mr. Watson home because Mr. Watson seemed groggy and because his boss was afraid that Mr. Watson would get hurt if he remained at work. When Mrs. Watson 2 Although plaintiff s brief indicates that, from 21 August 2006 through 13 December 2006, Dr. King prescribed 120 ten-milligram tablets of methadone each month for Mr. Watson, the medical records before us indicate that Dr. King prescribed 124 tenmilligram tablets of methadone each month. We further observe that the pharmacy that filled Mr. Watson s August through October prescriptions for methadone dispensed 120 ten-milligram tablets, while the pharmacy that filled Mr. Watson s November and December prescriptions dispensed 124 ten-milligram tablets.
6 -6- returned home around 5:30 p.m., she found that her husband had passed away on the back deck. Mr. Watson s cause of death was methadone toxicity. The Chief Medical Examiner s Office found that only 28 methadone tablets remained from the prescription filled one week earlier for 155 methadone tablets. In other words, after filling his most recent monthly methadone prescription just one week earlier, upon Mr. Watson s death, less than six days worth of methadone remained. When Mrs. Watson looked through Mr. Watson s tool bag at work one week after his death to see if she could locate any of the missing methadone pills, she found none. Plaintiff filed a wrongful death action against defendants alleging that defendants negligence caused her husband s death. After voluntarily dismissing her claims without prejudice, plaintiff again filed a complaint against defendants alleging the same cause of action. Defendants answered and asserted several affirmative defenses, including that plaintiff s claims were barred by the doctrine of contributory negligence. Defendants then moved for summary judgment. After considering the pleadings and the materials submitted by the parties, the trial court determined that defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of contributory negligence, and dismissed plaintiff s claims with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals.
7 -7- Plaintiff contends the trial court erred by allowing defendants motion for summary judgment because she asserts there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether Mr. Watson s conduct contributed to his death. We disagree. A motion for summary judgment may be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Ballenger v. Crowell, 38 N.C. App. 50, 53, 247 S.E.2d 287, 290 (1978); see also N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (2011). All evidence before the court must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. The slightest doubt as to the facts entitles the non-moving party to a trial. Ballenger, 38 N.C. App. at 53, 247 S.E.2d at 290. [O]rdinarily, summary judgment is not proper in actions involving contributory negligence, since the standard used in contributory negligence cases, that of reasonable care, usually requires a jury determination. Sawyer v. Food Lion, Inc., 144 N.C. App. 398, 401, 549 S.E.2d 867, (2001) (citation omitted). Nevertheless, [i]n an action for wrongful death predicated on negligence, summary judgment for defendant is correct where the evidence... establishes contributory negligence on the part of the decedent.... Brown v. Duke
8 -8- Power Co., 45 N.C. App. 384, 386, 263 S.E.2d 366, 368 (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied, 300 N.C. 194, 269 S.E.2d 615 (1980). In other words, where the uncontroverted evidence shows that a plaintiff has failed to use due care and that such contributory negligence was at least one of the proximate causes of plaintiff s injuries, a defendant is entitled to summary judgment. Meadows v. Lawrence, 75 N.C. App. 86, 88 89, 330 S.E.2d 47, 49 (1985), aff d per curiam, 315 N.C. 383, 337 S.E.2d 851 (1986). In the present case, according to her own testimony, about five weeks before Mr. Watson s death, plaintiff called Dr. King s office to report that she had some concerns regarding her husband s medication, which was memorialized in Dr. King s notes as an expression of concern that Mr. Watson was abusing his medication. Two days later, when Mr. Watson returned home from his 13 December 2006 appointment with Dr. King, Mr. Watson was upset because Dr. King told him that an anonymous caller had contacted the office to report that he was abusing his medicine, a claim which Mr. Watson denied. Although the parties do not dispute that Mr. Watson signed a Pain Management Agreement when he began his treatment with Dr. King, in which he agreed that he would use [his pain-control] medicine at a rate
9 -9- no greater than the prescribed rate, Mrs. Watson said she questioned her husband about discrepancies she found between the number of pills that should have been present in his methadone prescription bottle and the number of pills that were actually present in his prescription bottle. Mr. Watson declared that the reason for the discrepancy was that he had brought some of the methadone pills to work and stored them in his tool bag in order to have medication available to him as needed while he was at work. Nevertheless, during the course of its investigation, the Chief Medical Examiner s Office found only 28 methadone tablets remaining from the prescription for 155 methadone tablets that Mr. Watson brought home one week prior to his death, and Mrs. Watson did not find any of the missing methadone pills in the tool bag in which her husband claimed he was keeping the rest of his methadone prescription. Additionally, plaintiff designated as her experts Dr. Maryanne Gaffney Kraft and Dr. Robert Hodges Bilbro. Dr. Gaffney Kraft is a forensic pathologist who served as Associate Chief Medical Examiner for the North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner at the time of Mr. Watson s death and performed his autopsy. Dr. Gaffney Kraft was designated by plaintiff as an expert witness who would testify that methadone toxicity was the cause of Mr. Watson s death based on the
10 -10- totality of the autopsy examination and that toxicological analysis of Mr. Watson s postmortem blood and liver shows lethal levels of methadone. Dr. Bilbro, a physician who is boardcertified in internal medicine, was designated by plaintiff as an expert witness who would testify how Dr. King breached the standard of care for the treatment of [Mr. Watson]. Based on the uncontroverted evidence that only 28 out of the 155 methadone pills remained in Mr. Watson s week-old prescription bottle at the time of his death, Dr. Gaffney Kraft testified that such a finding tells [her] that [Mr. Watson] was not using the medication as prescribed and [was] using more medication than he was supposed to. (Emphasis added.) Dr. Gaffney Kraft also agreed that Mr. Watson s failure to take his methadone as prescribed contributed to his death. When Dr. Bilbro was asked his opinion as to whether Mr. Watson contributed to his death by exceeding the prescribed dosage of methadone, Dr. Bilbro answered, Yeah. That does contribute to the outcome [of his death]. Moreover, based on the toxicology report, Dr. Gaffney Kraft testified that, comparing the [methadone] levels that [Mr. Watson] had in his blood to the level [she] would expect that he would have with the dose he was given, the level is too high. She also testified, [I]n my opinion, the level is not
11 -11- consistent with the dose he was taking, it s higher than it should have been, and it does fall into both the toxic and lethal level.... Dr. Gaffney Kraft further testified that, due to the absence of pill fragments in his stomach at the time of the autopsy, the toxic and lethal levels of methadone in Mr. Watson s system did not result from a one-time ingestion of a handful of pills, suggesting that [Mr. Watson] may have been using too many pills over a period of time. Thus, based on our review of the evidence before us, we conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to whether Mr. Watson ingested the prescribed methadone pills at a rate greater than that of Dr. King s prescribed dosing schedule, and that, as a result of this conduct, Mr. Watson contributed to his own death. Furthermore, we find no merit in plaintiff s unsupported assertion that the trial court should have allowed a jury to determine whether Mr. Watson exercised reasonable care when, as the uncontested evidence shows, he ingested methadone in amounts exceeding Dr. King s prescribed dosage in contravention of the express terms of his Pain Management Agreement with defendants so as to cause the levels of methadone in his body to become toxic and lethal. Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not err when it granted defendants motion for summary judgment and dismissed
12 -12- plaintiff s complaint with prejudice. Affirmed. Judges STEELMAN and ERVIN concur. Report per Rule 30(e).
NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 September 2006
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 July Appeal by plaintiff from orders entered 15 April 2010 and 2
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May 2013
NO. COA12-1071 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 May 2013 THE ESTATE OF DONNA S. RAY, BY THOMAS D. RAY AND ROBERT A. WILSON, IV, Administrators of the Estate of Donna S. Ray, and THOMAS D. RAY,
More informationCourt of Appeals. Slip Opinion
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 15 November SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC. and GIFT SURPLUS, LLC, Plaintiffs
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 January 2007
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 August Appeal by defendant from order entered 15 July 2010 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 18 September 2007
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 1 July Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 5 September 2013 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationRICHARD HENRY CAPPS, Plaintiff, v. DANIELE ELIZABETH VIRREY, JERRY NEIL LINKER and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants NO.
RICHARD HENRY CAPPS, Plaintiff, v. DANIELE ELIZABETH VIRREY, JERRY NEIL LINKER and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants NO. COA06-655 Filed: 19 June 2007 1. Appeal and Error appealability order
More informationDEBORAH FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FOOD LION, LLC, BUDGET SERVICES, INC., and FRANK S FLOOR CARE, Defendants NO. COA Filed: 6 September 2005
DEBORAH FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FOOD LION, LLC, BUDGET SERVICES, INC., and FRANK S FLOOR CARE, Defendants NO. COA04-1570 Filed: 6 September 2005 1. Appeal and Error--preservation of issues--failure to raise
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 1 May Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 19 April 2006 by Judge
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ELMA BOGUS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT BOGUS, UNPUBLISHED January 24, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellant, V No. 262531 LC No. 03-319085-NH MARK SAWKA, M.D.,
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 3 February 2015
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationCourt of Appeals. Slip Opinion
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 February Appeal by respondents from order entered 8 August 2013 by
NO. COA14-108 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 17 February 2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE FORECLOSURE OF A DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY RALPH M. FOSTER AND SHYVONNE L. STEED-FOSTER DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2010
More informationMARY H. NICHOLS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No April 16, 1999
Present: All the Justices MARY H. NICHOLS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 981388 April 16, 1999 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationDAVID M. ELLIOTT and ELLIOTT AIR, INC., Plaintiffs, v. LISA L. ELLIOTT, DIANE K. NICHOLS, KAREN POWERS, and DENNIS L. MORAN, Defendants.
DAVID M. ELLIOTT and ELLIOTT AIR, INC., Plaintiffs, v. LISA L. ELLIOTT, DIANE K. NICHOLS, KAREN POWERS, and DENNIS L. MORAN, Defendants. NO. COA08-1493 (Filed 6 October 2009) 1. Civil Procedure Rule 60
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 August v. Mecklenburg County No. 09 CVD JACQUELINE MOSS, Defendant
NO. COA11-1313 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 August 2012 GREGORY K. MOSS, Plaintiff v. Mecklenburg County No. 09 CVD 19525 JACQUELINE MOSS, Defendant 1. Appeal and Error preservation of issues
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 October 2012
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 2 May 2017
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 15 March Appeal by defendants from order entered 28 January 2010 by
NO. COA10-383 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 15 March 2011 PAULA MAY TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. Watauga County No. 09 CVS 517 MARK WILLIAM SHOOK, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff
More informationMANEY & GORDON, P.A. 101 East Kennedy Boulevard Suite 3170 Tampa, Florida Tel: (813) Fax: (813)
Filing # 11196211 Electronically Filed 03/11/2014 01:57:08 PM RECEIVED, 3/11/2014 13:58:49, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM BERNHART, M.D., ROY LIPTRAP, P.A.,
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 15 July Appeal by defendants from order entered 17 September 2013
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 November v. Brunswick County No. 12 CVD 2009 SCOTT D. ALDRIDGE Defendant.
NO. COA13-450 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 5 November 2013 FIRST FEDERAL BANK Plaintiff, v. Brunswick County No. 12 CVD 2009 SCOTT D. ALDRIDGE Defendant. 1. Negotiable Instruments promissory
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 21 May 2013
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitu te controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 September v. New Hanover County Nos. 11 CVM 1575 JOHN MUNN, 11 CVM 1576 Defendant.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 21, 2005
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 21, 2005 PHILLIP B. FLOWERS, SR., ET AL. v. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, INC., d/b/a SOUTHERN HILLS MEDICAL CENTER Appeal
More informationNO. COA13-43 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 November 2013
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 June Appeal by plaintiff from order entered on or about 30
NO. COA10-646 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 June 2011 DOUGHERTY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Guilford County No. 09 CVD 7477 M.C. PRECAST CONCRETE, INC., Defendant Appeal by plaintiff
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 April 2013
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 December Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 17 August 2007 by Court of Appeals
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 February 2013
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 April Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 25 February 2010
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationhttp://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2005/040796-1.htm All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina Reports and North
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 February Appeal by defendant from judgment and orders entered 1
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 May Appeal by plaintiff from opinion and award filed 18 January
NO. COA02-470 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 6 May 2003 PHIL S. TAYLOR, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, Employer, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Carrier, Defendants. Appeal by plaintiff
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May Tort Claims Act negligence insufficient findings of fact contributory negligence
NO. COA12-1307 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 May 2013 WILLIAM R. NUNN, Plaintiff, v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (F/K/A DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION), Defendant. North Carolina Industrial Commission
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA15-4. Filed: 15 September 2015
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 November Appeal by plaintiff from judgment filed 29 August 2001 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationWILLIAM MICHAEL BOYKIN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS RAY MORRISON, RUFUS AARON WILSON, JR. and WILLIE PERRY, Defendants No. COA (Filed 28 December 2001)
WILLIAM MICHAEL BOYKIN, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS RAY MORRISON, RUFUS AARON WILSON, JR. and WILLIE PERRY, Defendants No. COA01-80 (Filed 28 December 2001) 1. Insurance automobile--uninsured motorist--motion
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 May Appeal by Defendant from order entered 28 June 2013 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: August 29, 2003; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2002-CA-001637-MR SHAWN SHOFNER and STEPHANIE SHOFNER, Individually, and as the Administratrix of
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 August Mecklenburg County. and
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 21 August Durham County No. 10-CVS-5560
NO. COA12-216 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 21 August 2012 ESTATE OF PHYLLIS REYNOLDS WOODEN, BY AND THROUGH ITS EXECUTRIX, ANDREA WOODEN JONES, Plaintiff, vs. HILLCREST CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC.
More informationv No Macomb Circuit Court ST. JOHN MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL,
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S ESTATE OF BETTY SIMMS-NORMAN, by its Personal Representative, MARCIA BUTTS, UNPUBLISHED June 19, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 334892 Macomb Circuit
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 6 October 2015
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-64 Filed: 6 October 2015 Wake County, No. 13 CVS 15711 WILLIAM SHANNON, M.D., Plaintiff, v. BOB TESTEN, JOSPEH P. JORDAN, and NORTH CAROLINA PHYSICIANS
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May 2013
REVOLUTIONARY CONCEPTS, INC., a North Carolina corporation, and RONALD CARTER, Plaintiffs, NO. COA12-1167 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 May 2013 v. Mecklenburg County No. 08 CVS 4333 CLEMENTS
More informationJERRY WAYNE WHISNANT, JR. Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERRERA, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 2 November 2004
JERRY WAYNE WHISNANT, JR. Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS HERRERA, Defendant NO. COA03-1607 Filed: 2 November 2004 1. Motor Vehicles--negligence--contributory--automobile collision--speeding There was sufficient
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF CARA MITCHELL and LARRY MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellants, FOR PUBLICATION February 8, 2002 9:05 a.m. v No. 218820 Wayne Circuit Court JOHN C. DOUGHERTY, J.D.,
More informationANTHONY CURTIS SLOAN, JR. Plaintiff v. CHENAY SANDERS SLOAN, Defendant v. ANTHONY C. SLOAN, SR. and KATHY SLOAN, Intervenors NO.
ANTHONY CURTIS SLOAN, JR. Plaintiff v. CHENAY SANDERS SLOAN, Defendant v. ANTHONY C. SLOAN, SR. and KATHY SLOAN, Intervenors NO. COA03-905 Filed: 4 May 2004 1. Child Support, Custody, and Visitation--visitation--grandparents
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 August v. Rowan County Nos. 06 CRS CRS NICHOLAS JERMAINE STEELE
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 4 March Appeal by Defendant from order entered 29 April 2013 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 May 2014
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 YVONNE HORSEY, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : v. : : THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : WALEED S. SHALABY, M.D., AND : JENNIFER
More informationNO. COA14-94 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 September Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 2 August 2013 by
NO. COA14-94 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 16 September 2014 KAYLA J. INMAN v. Columbus County No. 12 CVS 561 CITY OF WHITEVILLE, a municipality incorporated under the laws of the State of North
More informationProvided Courtesy of:
Provided Courtesy of: Banister Financial, Inc. 1338 Harding Place, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28204 Phone: 704-334-4932 Fax: 704-334-5770 www.businessvalue.com For a business valuation, contact: George B.
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 18 September 2012
NO. COA12-131 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 18 September 2012 SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff, v. Forsyth County No. 10 CVS 983 BRYANT/SUTPHIN PROPERTIES, LLC, CALVERT R. BRYANT, JR. AND DONALD H. SUTPHIN,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BARBARA LAGACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 14, 2011 v No. 294946 Bay Circuit Court BAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LC No. 09-003087 JANE/JOHN DOE, and GINNY WEAVER,
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 15 May 2012
NO. COA11-769 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 15 May 2012 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., Plaintiff v. Iredell County No. 09 CVD 0160 JUDY C. REED, TROY D. REED, JUDY C. REED, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 September 2017
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 17 March 2015
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA14-810 Filed: 17 March 2015 MACON BANK, INC., Plaintiff, Macon County v. No. 13 CVS 456 STEPHEN P. GLEANER, MARTHA K. GLEANER, and WILLIAM A. PATTERSON,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI MARGIE KEMP VS. MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI, INC., AND MISSISSIPPI DISCOUNT DRUGS OF CLINTON, INC. PLAINTIFF
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 1 April 2014
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 2 August ERIC DUBERMAN, M.D. and WESTERN WAKE SURGICAL, P.C., Defendants.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-873 Filed: 2 August 2016 Wake County, No. 13 CVS 3843 ZARMINA SERAJ, Plaintiff, v. ERIC DUBERMAN, M.D. and WESTERN WAKE SURGICAL, P.C., Defendants. Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 April 2016
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-368 Filed: 5 April 2016 Mecklenburg County, No. 13 CVS 11691 THOMAS A. E. DAVIS, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of LISA MARY DAVIS, (deceased), Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 5 July 2016
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF GREGG ALLAN DALLAIRE, by its Personal Representative, KATHY D. DALLAIRE, UNPUBLISHED December 21, 2010 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 292971 Ingham Circuit Court
More informationEVIDENCE ISSUES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES
EVIDENCE ISSUES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES Catherine Eagles, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge (August 2009) (slightly revised by the School of Government to include changes made by Session Law 2011-400)
More informationNO. COA Filed: 5 June Guardian and Ward--motion to modify guardianship--jurisdiction
In the Matter of the Guardianship of: CLARA STEVENS THOMAS, Incompetent: MARY PAUL THOMAS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. TERESA T. BIRCHARD, Moving Party/Appellee NO. COA06-623 Filed: 5 June 2007 1. Guardian
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 17 May 2016
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-1062 Filed: 17 May 2016 Harnett County, No. 14 CVD 1578 MACK DEVAUGHN POPE, Plaintiff, v. DAWN WRENCH POPE, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from order
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 19, 2016 v No. 323755 Wayne Circuit Court ROSEMARY KING, DERRICK ROE, JOHN LC No. 13-003902-NI DOE, and ALLSTATE
More information(Filed 2 October 2001) 1. Medical Malpractice--negligence--res ipsa loquitur--unfavorable reaction to medicine
MARGARET WRENN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. DEAN GEORGE ASSIMOS, M.D., DR. R. LAWRENCE KROOVARD, M.D., DR. MARK R. HESS, M.D., WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS, WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER,
More informationLISA KARGER, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD KELVIN WOOD, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 06 December 2005
LISA KARGER, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD KELVIN WOOD, Defendant NO. COA05-251 Filed: 06 December 2005 1. Child Support, Custody, and Visitation--custody -substantial change in circumstances The trial court did
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 2 October 2012
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EUSEBIO SALDANA, individually and as the personal representative of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL SALDANA, and JOSEPHINE SALDANA, UNPUBLISHED August 4, 2016 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationDANIEL BRENENSTUHL, Plaintiff, v. KAREN E. BRENENSTUHL (MAGEE), Defendant NO. COA Filed: 5 April 2005
DANIEL BRENENSTUHL, Plaintiff, v. KAREN E. BRENENSTUHL (MAGEE), Defendant NO. COA04-1007 Filed: 5 April 2005 Divorce- incorporated separation agreement--military retirement pay The trial court did not
More informationThis Case Provided Courtesy of: Banister Financial, Inc Harding Place, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC Phone:
This Case Provided Courtesy of: Banister Financial, Inc. 1338 Harding Place, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28204 Phone: 704-334-4932 www.businessvalue.com For More Information Contact: George B. Hawkins, ASA,
More informationSTEVEN BUELTEL, Plaintiff v. LUMBER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, also known as Lumber Insurance Companies, Defendant. No. COA
STEVEN BUELTEL, Plaintiff v. LUMBER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, also known as Lumber Insurance Companies, Defendant No. COA98-1006 (Filed 17 August 1999) 1. Declaratory Judgments--actual controversy--restrictive
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
7/23/2015 1:22:59 PM 15CV19618 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ANNA BELL, CASE NO. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT
More informationCase 4:05-cv WRW Document 223 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Case 405-cv-00163-WRW Document 223 Filed 07/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION In re PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION LINDA REEVES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 16 January 2018
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationRAWLS & ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina General Partnership Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALICE W. HURST and BILLY A. HURST, Defendants-Appellants No.
RAWLS & ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina General Partnership Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALICE W. HURST and BILLY A. HURST, Defendants-Appellants No. COA00-567 (Filed 19 June 2001) 1. Civil Procedure--summary judgment--sealed
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2015 Session CLIFFORD SWEARENGEN v. DMC-MEMPHIS, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0057-2011 John R. McCarroll,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 4 October 2016
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA16-142 Filed: 4 October 2016 Moore County, No. 15 CVS 217 SUSAN J. BALDELLI; TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.; and TRIDENT DESIGNS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. STEVEN
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1677 MICHAEL MEAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CALVIN SHAW, Individually and in his capacity as Captain of the Gaston County Police
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JANET TIPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION April 19, 2005 9:05 a.m. v No. 252117 Oakland Circuit Court WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL and LC No. 2003-046552-CP ANDREW
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 15 October Appeal by defendant from an order entered 6 August 2012 by
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 July WAKE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Intervenor/Plaintiff, v.
ROBERT SCOTT BAKER, JR., Plaintiff, NO. COA01-920 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 16 July 2002 WAKE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Intervenor/Plaintiff, v. SHERI USSERY SHOWALTER,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-2152 A13-2160 Samuel Deweese, Respondent (A13-2152),
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
Rasheed Olds v. US Doc. 403842030 Appeal: 10-6683 Document: 23 Date Filed: 04/05/2012 Page: 1 of 5 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6683 RASHEED OLDS, Plaintiff
More informationNO. COA Filed: 7 November Class Actions--ruling on summary judgment before deciding motion for class certification
ROBERT A. LEVERETTE, RICKY WHITEHEAD, and JOHN ALLEN CLARK, both individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. LABOR WORKS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,LABOR WORKS INTERNATIONAL
More information1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: April 13, NO. 34,914
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: April 13, 2017 4 NO. 34,914 5 KATHLEEN M. OAKEY, Personal Representative 6 of the Estate of TAWANA LUCERO, deceased,
More informationby the negligence of the defendant in treating the plaintiff s emergency medical condition 2?"
Page 1 of 10 809.22 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONDITION-- DIRECT (Use for claims arising on or after 1 October 2011. For claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I. Civil 809.00.) NOTE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 24, 2012 v No. 301049 Emmet Circuit Court MICHAEL JAMES KRUSELL, LC No. 10-003236-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More information(Use for claims arising on or after 1 October For claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I. Civil )
PAGE 1 OF 11 (Use for claims arising on or after 1 October 2011. For claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I. Civil 809.03.) NOTE WELL: Res Ipsa Loquitur has been approved as an option for liability
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2017-0412, Louis F. Clarizio v. R. David DePuy, Esq. & a., the court on October 12, 2018, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and
More informationv No Oakland Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNPUBLISHED July 25, 2017 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, v No. 332597 Oakland Circuit Court MICHAEL
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 May 2011
NO. COA10-611 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 17 May 2011 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO., as Subrogee of JASON TORRANCE, Plaintiff, v. Orange County No. 09 CVS 1643 DURAPRO; WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 April Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 31 October 2013 by Judge A.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More information