Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Transcription

1 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 7 KRIS W. KOBACH, KANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, THE UNITED STATES ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION, et al., and Defendants, VALLE DEL SOL, SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT, COMMON CAUSE, CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC., and DEBRA LOPEZ, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Defendant Intervenors. Case No EFM-TJJ JOINT NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO SHORTENING OF DEFENDANTS OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS EXPEDITED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE BY DEFENDANT INTERVENORS VALLE DEL SOL, SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT, COMMON CAUSE, CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC., AND DEBRA LOPEZ; DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR PROJECT VOTE; AND DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ARIZONA, AND LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF KANSAS Plaintiffs request for expedited treatment of their Motion to Compel (Docket No. 187 should be denied. Plaintiffs have known that the EAC was awaiting this Court s ruling on the 1

2 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 2 of 7 pending stay motions to publicly distribute a modified version of the Federal Form since Friday, April 11, when the EAC gave notice of its position. See Docket No But Plaintiffs, after requesting and receiving their own extension to oppose the pending stay motions, waited a week until the evening of Good Friday before Easter weekend to file the motion to compel, which seeks an order to be issued within 24 hours. Plaintiffs provided no notice whatsoever and no reason for abridging any party s time for responding to their motion. Plaintiffs delay in responding to Defendant Intervenors motion to stay, coupled with their delay in filing their expedited motion, show that Plaintiffs will suffer no irreparable injury from allowing opposing parties to respond within the time provided by Local Rule 6.1 or until the Court has ruled on the pending stay motions. Plaintiffs request for relief within 24 hours, if granted, would deprive opposing parties of the full time to respond to the request pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(d. Plaintiffs are thus asking the Court to act on an ex parte basis without showing cause or conferring with affected parties. Although the Local Rules governing modification do not expressly address requests for expedited briefing, Plaintiffs should have followed the Local Rules express procedure for seeking modification of the typical briefing schedule. Specifically, Local Rule 6.1(a provides that when seeking an extension of time, a party must show, among other things: (1 whether there has been prior consultation with other parties and the views of other parties; and (2 cause for the requested extension. Plaintiffs did not confer with EAC, the Valle del Sol Defendant Intervenors, or any other Defendant Intervenors. Similarly, Plaintiffs made no showing of injury or any other grounds showing good cause for that matter which would result from the normal briefing schedule. In fact, by delaying as long as a week after the EAC s April 11 notice to file their motion to 2

3 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 3 of 7 compel, Plaintiffs have conceded they will not be harmed if Defendants are permitted the full time to respond. By their silence and their actions, Plaintiffs have shown they have no justification for shortening opposing parties time to respond. Defendants and Defendant Intervenors must be provided adequate time to respond to the motion to compel which, given Plaintiffs delay and lack of any cause shown, should not be briefed ahead of the pending stay motions, especially after Plaintiffs request to extend the stay motion briefing. After purposely delaying resolution of the pending stay motions themselves, Plaintiffs cannot now claim that waiting for the resolution of the stay motions will prejudice their interests so that their own later-filed motion may be resolved first. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Intervenors Valle Del Sol, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Common Cause, Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., Debra Lopez, Project Vote, League of Women Voters of The United States, League of Women Voters of Arizona, and League of Women Voters of Kansas respectfully request that the Court deny Plaintiffs request for expedited treatment of their Motion to Compel and permit Defendants and Defendant Intervenors to file their oppositions within the time provided in Local Rule 6.1(d. 3

4 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 4 of 7 Dated: April 21, 2014 Nina Perales (Tex. Bar No * Ernest Herrera (N.M. Bar No * MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 110 Broadway, Suite 300 San Antonio, Texas Phone: Facsimile: Respectfully submitted, By /s/ Judd M. Treeman Jeffrey J. Simon (Kansas S. Ct. No Judd M. Treeman (Kansas S. Ct. No HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP 4801 Main Street Suite 1000 Kansas City, Missouri Phone: Facsimile: Linda Smith (Cal. Bar No * Adam P. KohSweeney (Cal. Bar No * J. Jorge deneve (Cal. Bar No * O MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA Phone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors Valle del Sol, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Common Cause, Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., and Debra Lopez * Admitted pro hac vice 4

5 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 5 of 7 Dated: April 21, 2014 Michelle Kanter Cohen* PROJECT VOTE 805 Fifteenth Street NW, Suite 250 Washington, DC Telephone: ( Fax: ( mkantercohen@projectvote.org /s/john A. Freedman (with permission Robert N. Weiner* John A. Freedman* Andrew W. Beyer* Andrew Treaster, #24676 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street NW Washington, DC Telephone: ( Fax: ( john.freedman@aporter.com Respectfully submitted, Lee Thompson, #08361 Erin C. Thompson, #22117 THOMPSON LAW FIRM, LLC 106 E. 2nd Street Wichita, Kansas Telephone: ( Fax: ( lthompson@tslawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor Project Vote * Admitted pro hac vice 5

6 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 6 of 7 Dated: April 21, 2014 /s/ Michael C. Keats (with permission Michael C. Keats* Bonnie L. Jarrett* Adam Teitcher* KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY Phone: Fax: michael.keats@kirkland.com, bonnie.jarrett@kirkland.com, adam.teitcher@kirkland.com Neil Eggleston* Susan Davies* Jonathan Janow* Rachel B. Funk* KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C Phone: Fax: neil.eggleston@kirkland.com, susan.davies@kirkland.com, jonathan.janow@kirkland.com, rachel.funk@kirkland.com Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors League of Women Voters of the United States, League of Women Voters of Arizona, and League of Women Voters of Kansas Respectfully submitted, David G. Seely, No FLEESON, GOOING, COULSON & KITCH L.L.C Epic Center, 301 N. Main Wichita, KS Phone: Fax: dseely@fleeson.com Wendy R. Weiser* Director, Democracy Program Tomas Lopez* Jonathan Brater* BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor New York, NY Phone: Fax: wendy.weiser@nyu.edu, lopezt@exchange.law.nyu.edu, braterj@exchange.law.nyu.edu * Admitted pro hac vice 6

7 Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, on the 21st day of April, 2014, I electronically filed the above and foregoing document using the CM/ECF system, which automatically sends notice and a copy of the filing to all counsel of record. /s/ Judd M. Treeman Judd M. Treeman, Kansas S. Ct. No Attorney for Defendant Intervenors Valle del Sol, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Common Cause, Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., and Debra Lopez 7