IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PORTIS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
|
|
- Leslie Briggs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PORTIS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBIN MARQUARDT, ELIZABETH A. CHARGUALAF, and FRANK L. GOGUE, Defendants-Appellees. Supreme Court Case No.: CVA Superior Court Case No.: CV OPINION Cite as: 2018 Guam 22 Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam Argued and submitted on July 12, 2018 Hagåtña, Guam Appearing for Plaintiff-Appellant: Jacques G. Bronze, Esq. Law Offices of Jacques G. Bronze 173 Aspinall Ave., Ste. 206A Hagåtña, Guam Appearing for Defendants-Appellees: John Richard Bordallo Bell, Esq. The Law Offices of John Richard Bordallo Bell 157 Veronica Way Tamuning, Guam 96913
2 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 2 of 8 BEFORE: KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Chief Justice; F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; and ROBERT J. TORRES, Associate Justice. TORRES, J.: [1] Plaintiff-Appellant Portis International, LLC ( Portis ) appeals from a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Guam Rule of Civil Procedure ( GRCP ) 12(b)(6). Portis also appeals the Superior Court s award of attorney s fees to Defendants-Appellees Robin Marquardt, Elizabeth A. Chargualaf, and Frank L. Gogue (collectively, Marquardt ). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND [2] Portis initiated the action below by filing a complaint for forcible entry and detainer under 21 GCA 21101(a) and 21102(a). Marquardt attacked the complaint in part by moving to dismiss for failure to state a claim under GRCP 12(b)(6). In the motion, Marquardt also requested attorney s fees and costs pursuant to an underlying lease agreement. On January 5, 2017, the Superior Court issued a Decision and Order ( January Order ) that granted Marquardt s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and awarded attorney s fees and costs, leaving only the amount open to further adjudication. After further proceedings, on October 6, 2017, the trial court awarded $15, in attorney s fees and costs to Marquardt ( October Order ). The trial court later issued a final judgment incorporating both the dismissal of Portis s complaint pursuant to GRCP 12(b)(6) and the award of attorney s fees and costs. This was the only judgment issued by the court below. Portis filed its appeal on December 5, This court, after sua sponte review of the trial record, ordered the parties to submit simultaneous supplemental briefs on the issue of whether this court had jurisdiction to consider the appeal, to which the parties complied.
3 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 3 of 8 II. JURISDICTION [3] Jurisdictional issues may be raised by any party at any time or sua sponte by the court. Duenas v. George & Matilda Kallingal, P.C., 2013 Guam The jurisdictional statutes prescribing this court s appellate jurisdiction are strictly interpreted. Id. (citing People v. Natividad, 2005 Guam 28 1). For the reasons below, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. III. ANALYSIS A. The January Order Was Final and Appealable [4] Whether this court has appellate jurisdiction turns on whether the January Order was final and appealable with respect to the 12(b)(6) dismissal. That order dismissed the case pursuant to GRCP 12(b)(6) and awarded attorney s fees and costs, but it left open the question of the amount of fees and costs for further determination a question that was not resolved until the October Order. See Record on Appeal ( RA ), tab 26 at 8 (Dec. & Order, Jan. 5, 2017); RA, tab 42 at 10 (Dec. & Order, Oct. 6, 2017). [5] This court has appellate jurisdiction over civil appeals arising from final judgments or final orders entered in the Superior Court. 7 GCA 3107(b), 3108 (2005); see also 7 GCA 25102(a) (2005). A judgment or order is final if it disposes of the entire case by determining the rights of the parties in an action. Sharrock v. McCoy, 2016 Guam 7 39 (citing 7 GCA and collecting cases); see also Duenas, 2013 Guam ( [T]o appeal an order as a final judgment, the order must have the effect of disposing of the case and must be reduced to a final judgment. (quoting People v. Angoco, 2006 Guam 18 10)); Guam R. Civ. P. 54(a). [6] Ordinarily, an order or judgment granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim amounts to a final judgment. See, e.g., Wheeless v. Maria Parham Med. Ctr., Inc., 768 S.E.2d
4 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 4 of 8 119, 122 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014) (citations omitted). However, it is less clear whether an order is final when it dismisses a case pursuant to GRCP 12(b)(6) and is coupled with an award of attorney s fees, with such fees subject to further proceedings to determine the amount to be awarded. [7] Under the federal approach, 1 in Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196 (1988), the United States Supreme Court unanimously adopted a rule that a decision on the merits is a final decision... whether or not there remains for adjudication a request for attorney s fees attributable to the case. 486 U.S. at Budinich was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court as recently as See Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int l Union of Operating Eng rs & Participating Emp rs, 571 U.S. 177, (2014). In Ray Haluch Gravel, the Court clarified that Budinich applied irrespective of whether the claims to attorney s fees and costs sounded in statute versus in contract. The Court emphasized that the [o]perational consistency stressed in Budinich is not promoted by providing for different jurisdictional effect... based solely on whether the asserted right to fees is based on a contract or a statute. Id. at 186. We adopted Budinich in Data Management Resources, LLC v. Office of Public Accountability, 2013 Guam Several states have done the same. See, e.g., State Bd. of Educ. v. Waldrop, 840 So. 2d 893, 899 (Ala. 2002); Baldwin v. Bright Mortg. Co., 757 P.2d 1072, (Colo. 1988) (en banc); Hylton v. Gunter, 97 A.3d 970, (Conn. 2014); Snodgrass v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 789 P.2d 211, 213 (Kan. 1990); Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison, 824 P.2d 1033, 1041 (N.M. 1992). 1 [B]ecause the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure are generally derived from, although not identical to, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure..., federal decisions that construe the federal counterparts to the [GRCP] are persuasive authority. Gov t of Guam v. O Keefe, 2018 Guam 4 9. In addition, because the Guam Rules of Appellate Procedure are substantially similar to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, we look to federal case law when interpreting the Guam Rules of Appellate Procedure. Data Mgmt. Res., LLC v. Office of Pub. Accountability, 2013 Guam
5 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 5 of 8 [8] The procedural posture of the present case is analogous to that which we encountered in Data Management, except that here, we are not presented with a potentially premature appeal as was the case in Data Management, see 2013 Guam but a potentially late appeal. The issue, however, is essentially identical, viz. whether an order issued by the trial court was final and appealable even though the issue of attorney s fees and costs was not completely finalized. We answered this question in the affirmative in Data Management. Id An apparent, but inconsequential, distinction between Data Management and the present case is that the claim for fees in Data Management was based on a statute, whereas Marquardt s claim for fees is based on a contractual prevailing-party provision in the underlying lease. Compare id. 14, with RA, tab 17 at 10 (Mot. Dismiss, Sept. 1, 2016). As stated, however, this type of distinction was recently held by the United States Supreme Court to be immaterial for the purposes of the rule adopted in Budinich. See Ray Haluch Gravel, 571 U.S. at 188 ( The rule adopted in Budinich ignores these distinctions in favor of an approach that looks solely to the character of the issue that remains open after the court has otherwise ruled on the merits of the case. ). Therefore, Data Management remains applicable to the present case, and as a result of its adoption of Budinich, the January Order was final and appealable with respect to the issue of the 12(b)(6) dismissal of Portis s complaint, notwithstanding the fact that the amount of attorney s fees and costs was not finalized. See Data Mgmt., 2013 Guam B. The Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over the Issue of the 12(b)(6) Dismissal [9] The filing of a timely notice of appeal to take an appeal as of right is an absolute requirement from which this court has no discretion to digress. Gill v. Siegel, 2000 Guam 10 5; accord Hawaiian Rock Prods. Corp. v. Ocean Hous., Inc., 2016 Guam 4 14; see also Marriott v. Marriott, 2014 Guam Guam Rule of Appellate Procedure ( GRAP )
6 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 6 of 8 4(a)(1) requires, in a civil case, that a notice of appeal be filed within thirty (30) days after the judgment or order appealed from is entered. Guam R. App. P. 4(a)(1); see also Marriott, 2014 Guam Under GRCP 58(a)(1), an order disposing of a motion to dismiss under GRCP 12(b)(6) must be reflected in a judgment set forth in a separate document (the separate document rule ). See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(a)(1); cf. Sharrock, 2016 Guam Where the separate document rule applies, a judgment is effectively entered when 150 days have run from entry of the underlying order on the docket, unless the judgment issues earlier. See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(b)(2)(B); see also Sharrock, 2016 Guam ; Agana Beach Condo. Homeowners Ass n v. Untalan, 2015 Guam 35 10; Marriott, 2014 Guam 28 8; Rapadas v. Benito, 2011 Guam 28 9; Quijano v. Atkins-Kroll, Inc., 2008 Guam [10] The separate document rule applied to the Superior Court s grant of the 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss in the January Order. See GRCP 58(a)(1). The January Order was entered on the docket on January 5, RA, tab 27 (Notice of Entry on Docket, Jan. 5, 2017). The 150th day from this date was Sunday, June 4, Thus, the judgment was effectively entered on Monday, June 5, See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(b)(2)(B); see also Guam R. App. P. 11(a)(1)(C); Sharrock, 2016 Guam Portis had 30 days from June 5, 2017, to file a Notice of Appeal. See Guam R. App. P. 4(a)(1), 4(a)(7)(B)(ii). Portis did not file its Notice of Appeal until December 5, 2017, see RA, tab 47 (Notice of Appeal, Dec. 5, 2017), 2 and we therefore lack jurisdiction with respect to the 12(b)(6) dismissal. 2 Under GRCP 58(c)(1) and GRAP 4(a)(4)(A), when a party moves for attorney s fees and costs under GRCP 54(d)(2), a trial court may before a notice of appeal has been filed... order that the motion be treated such that the time to file an appeal runs for all parties from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion. See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(c)(1); Guam R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A)(iii), (iv). Here, the Superior Court did not issue any order extending the time to appeal as contemplated by these procedural rules, and Portis did not file any motion making such a request.
7 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 7 of 8 C. The Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over the Issue of Attorney s Fees [11] The Superior Court was not required to issue a separate document regarding the issue of fees and costs. See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(a)(1)(C) ( [A] separate document is not required for an order disposing of a motion... for attorney fees under Rule 54. ). For orders not subject to the separate document rule, a judgment is entered when the order is entered in the civil docket. See Guam R. Civ. P. 58(b)(1). [12] Here, Marquardt moved for attorney s fees and costs pursuant to a contractual prevailingparty provision in the underlying lease, which falls under the type of fees provisions contemplated by GRCP 54, even though Marquardt s motion did not make explicit reference to GRCP 54. See RA, tab 17 at 10 (Mot. Dismiss); see also Pia Marine Homeowners Ass n v. Kinoshita Corp. Guam, Inc., 2013 Guam 6 19 ( [R]ule [54(d)] itself does not create a substantive right to fees: that must come from some other source. ). While the Superior Court awarded fees and costs in the January Order, it did not determine the final amount until October 6, 2017, see RA, tab 42 (Dec. & Order), which was entered on the docket on October 26, 2017, see RA, tab 44 (Am. Notice of Entry on Docket, Oct. 26, 2017). Even if, for the sake of argument, we were to take the October Order, rather than the January Order, as the final order disposing of the issue of attorney s fees and costs, Portis would have had 30 days from the entry of the October Order on the docket to file a Notice of Appeal. See Guam R. App. P. 4(a)(1), 4(a)(7)(A); see also Guam R. Civ. P. 58(b)(1). Portis did not file its Notice of Appeal until December 5, 2017, after this 30-day period elapsed. RA, tab 47 (Notice of Appeal); see also Guam R. App. P. 11(a)(1)(C). Therefore, its appeal of the award of attorney s fees and costs was similarly untimely, and we accordingly lack jurisdiction over that issue.
8 Portis Int l, LLC v. Marquardt, 2018 Guam 22, Opinion Page 8 of 8 IV. CONCLUSION [13] For the foregoing reasons, we DISMISS the Notice of Appeal filed by Portis on December 5, 2017, for lack of jurisdiction. /s/ F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO Associate Justice /s/ ROBERT J. TORRES Associate Justice /s/ KATHERINE A. MARAMAN Chief Justice
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. DAVID J. LUJAN and ANNA B. LUJAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM DAVID J. LUJAN and ANNA B. LUJAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CALVO FISHER & JACOB LLP f/k/a Calvo & Clark, LLP, a Guam Limited Partnership, and DOES 1 through
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. ALBERT J. BALAJADIA and WILLIAM L. GAVRAS, Plaintiff-Appellants, GOVERNMENT OF GUAM, Defendant-Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM ALBERT J. BALAJADIA and WILLIAM L. GAVRAS, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. GOVERNMENT OF GUAM, Defendant-Appellee. Supreme Court Case No.: CVA16-004 Superior Court Case No.: CV0183-15
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. G UAM WAT ERWORKS AUT H O RIT Y, Petitioner-Appellant, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM FILED ]14 DEC 16 Ffi SUPREME OF G_X-, G UAM WAT ERWORKS AUT H O RIT Y, Petitioner-Appellant, V. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, and DANIEL L. MESNGON, Real Party
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, ADAM JIM HILL, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2018 Guam 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADAM JIM HILL, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No. CRA16-009 Superior Court Case No. CF0297-14 OPINION Cite as: 2018 Guam 3 Appeal
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2160 BARBARA HUDSON, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. GUAM DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Petitioner-Appellant, GUAM CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM GUAM DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GUAM CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, CAROL SOMERFLECK, ET AL., Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. Supreme
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. JOSEPH T. DUENAS, as Administrator for the Estate of Rosario T. Quichocho, Plaintiff-Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM JOSEPH T. DUENAS, as Administrator for the Estate of Rosario T. Quichocho, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GEORGE AND MATILDA KALLINGAL, P.C., GJADE, INC., and FORTUNE JOINT VENTURE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff, FRANCISCO JUNIOR SANTOS, Defendant. OPINION. Cite as: 2018 Guam 12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO JUNIOR SANTOS, Defendant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRQ18-001 Superior Court Case No.: CM0094-18 OPINION Cite as: 2018 Guam 12 Certified
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, DAVID Q. MANILA, Defendant-Appellant, ANTHONY T. QUENGA and SONG JA CHA, Defendants.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID Q. MANILA, Defendant-Appellant, ANTHONY T. QUENGA and SONG JA CHA, Defendants. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA17-005 Superior Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, EUGENE BENAVENTE GOMIA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2017 Guam 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EUGENE BENAVENTE GOMIA, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No. CRA16-004 Superior Court Case No. CF0200-15 OPINION Cite as: 2017
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
p,,' - --..-- r-, - I I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM GERALD0 L. ABALOS and MERIEFE M. ABALOS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CYFRED, LTD., A GUAM CORPORATION; ENRIQUE BAZA, JR.; ELEANOR B. PEREZ; DONGBU INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, QUINTON ANDREW PRESCOTT BEZON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUINTON ANDREW PRESCOTT BEZON, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA17-015 Superior Court Case No.: CF0650-15 OPINION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. MARY ANN C. SABLAN, Petitioner-Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM MARY ANN C. SABLAN, Petitioner-Appellee, GUAM LAND USE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Respondents-Appellants, and YOUNEX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Intervenor-Appellant.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. KENNARD CRUZ PINEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MARIA-THELMA PASCUAL PINEDA, Defendant-Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM KENNARD CRUZ PINEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MARIA-THELMA PASCUAL PINEDA, Defendant-Appellee. Supreme Court Case No. CVA04-016 Superior Court Case No. DM 0450-03 OPINION Filed:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. SAN UNION, INC. dba HARMON GARDEN APARTMENTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, RICHARD ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM SAN UNION, INC. dba HARMON GARDEN APARTMENTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CVA16-010 Superior Court Case No.: CV0309-16
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF YUK LAN MOYLAN, Ward. RICHARD E. MOYLAN, Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF YUK LAN MOYLAN, Ward. RICHARD E. MOYLAN, Appellant, v. KURT MOYLAN, LEIALOHA MOYLAN ALSTON, and FRANCIS LESTER MOYLAN, JR., Appellees.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. EDDIE BAZA CALVO, I MAGA LÅHEN GUÅHAN, Petitioner, I MINA TRENTAI KUÅTTRO NA LIHESLATURAN GUÅHAN, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM EDDIE BAZA CALVO, I MAGA LÅHEN GUÅHAN, Petitioner, v. I MINA TRENTAI KUÅTTRO NA LIHESLATURAN GUÅHAN, Respondent. Supreme Court Case No.: WRM18-001 OPINION Cite as: 2018 Guam
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF YUK LAN MOYLAN, Ward. RICHARD E. MOYLAN, Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF YUK LAN MOYLAN, Ward. RICHARD E. MOYLAN, Appellant, v. KURT MOYLAN, LEIALOHA MOYLAN ALSTON, and FRANCIS LESTER MOYLAN, JR., Appellees.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ BALUYOT, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2016 Guam 20
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ BALUYOT, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA15-025 Superior Court Case No.: CF0256-14 OPINION Cite
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE HONGKONG and SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE HONGKONG and SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. DR. GEORGE KALLINGAL and DR. MATILDA KALLINGAL, Defendants-Appellees. Supreme Court Case No.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. LLUMELLE RAMIRO, ANGELA DUENAS, and MARY PEDRO, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM LLUMELLE RAMIRO, ANGELA DUENAS, and MARY PEDRO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLES B. WHITE, JR. as Administrator for the Estate of ERNESTO CASTRO SALES, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationBEFORE: KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Chief Justice; F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; ROBERT J. TORRES, Associate Justice.
People v. McKinney, 2018 Guam 10, Opinion Page 2 of 9 BEFORE: KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Chief Justice; F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; ROBERT J. TORRES, Associate Justice. CARBULLIDO, J.: [1] Defendant-Appellant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM IN THE APPLICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INSPECTION AND SEARCH WARRANT OF WISE OWL ANIMAL HOSPITAL Supreme Court Case No.: CVA16-005
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. EDWIN V. ALISASIS Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 25, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. EDWIN V. ALISASIS Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA03-006 Superior Court Case No.: CF0302-95 OPINION Filed: July 25, 2006
More informationSUPREME COURT OF GUAM
SUPREME COURT OF GUAM GUAM RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURES 1 (as of December 23, 2004) 1 Drafted by the Supreme Court Rules Commission September 13, 1993 Approved by P.L. 23-34 (June 6, 1995); Modified and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. GLENN W. GIBBS and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM GLENN W. GIBBS and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants vs. LEE HOLMES, JOAN HOLMES, and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Defendants-Appellees OPINION Filed: June
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, JEREMY REY LESLIE, Defendant- Appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, JEREMY REY LESLIE, Defendant- Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA11-001 Superior Court Case No.: CF0633-09 OPINION Cite as: 2011
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MARK B. ANGOCO Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: December 29, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MARK B. ANGOCO Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed: December 29, 2006 Cite as: 2006 Guam 18 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA05-011 Superior
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, MOSES M. MOSES, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION. Cite as: 2016 Guam 17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOSES M. MOSES, Defendant-Appellee. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA15-020 Superior Court Case No.: CF0275-14 OPINION Cite as: 2016 Guam
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARK BAMBA ANGOCO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2004 Guam 11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARK BAMBA ANGOCO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Supreme Court Case No. CRA03-003 Superior Court Case No. CF0428-94 Cite as: 2004 Guam
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Filed: July 2, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GABRIEL LAU, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed: July 2, 2007 Cite as: 2007 Guam 4 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA06-003 Superior Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE JOHN P. BAKER, ) No. 1 CA-CV 11-0389 ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) DEPARTMENT M ) v. ) O P I N I O N ) DEPUTY WARDEN BRADLEY; CO IV ) BASURTO; and ANNE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv JIC
Case: 16-13477 Date Filed: 10/09/2018 Page: 1 of 14 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-13477 D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv-60197-JIC MICHAEL HISEY, Plaintiff
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM "
r, :-:.-! 9-, -,np 1- -I- I L. *-.-, ', " IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM " KIN1 B. SANANAP, IOWANA M. SANANAP AND THE 40 LOT OWNERS (OF 33 LOTS) LISTED IN EXHIBIT "1" TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Plaintiffs-Appellees
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
For Publication. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS MOHAMMAD MUSTAFA and EASY, EASY HOME CENTER, Appellants/Defendants, v. Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 099/2013 (STX), Super. Ct. SM. No. 131/2013 (STX)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, JAMES NICHOLAS CORPUZ, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2019 Guam 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES NICHOLAS CORPUZ, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Cite as: 2019 Guam 1 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA16-014 Superior Court Case No.:
More informationDistinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals
Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals 2014 Upper Midwest Employment Law Institute May 20, 2014 Presentation by Former Chief Justice Eric J. Magnuson Partner, Robins,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. DAVI D J. LUJAN, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee,
rf LED?! AUG i ls 7: : _ : 3. r] SUPREME COURT OF CU, I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM DAVI D J. LUJAN, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee, V. DEBTRALYNNE S. QUINATA aka DEBBIE QUINATA and ALLAN A. QUINATA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. BETH PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM BETH PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, and GUAM DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Real Party in Interest-Appellee. Supreme Court Case No.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) ) ) S. Ct. Civ. No On Petition for Extraordinary Writ Considered and Filed: January 22, 2009
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS IN RE: JULIO A. BRADY, Petitioner. Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 342/2008 On Petition for Extraordinary Writ Considered and Filed: January 22, 2009
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY Robert A. Aragon, District Judge
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: January 24, 2013 Docket No. 31,496 ZUNI INDIAN TRIBE, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MCKINLEY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM EVELYN R. DUENAS. LEO BRADY dba ISLAND ELEVATOR and DOES 1-10 OPINION. Cite as: 2008 Guam 27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM EVELYN R. DUENAS Plaintiff-Appellant LEO BRADY dba ISLAND ELEVATOR and DOES 1-10 Defendant-Appellee OPINION Cite as: 2008 Guam 27 Supreme Court Case No. CVA07-003 Superior
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. ZURICH INSURANCE (GUAM), INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, VS. VIVIAN J. SANTOS, Defendant- Appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM Q[ fr?cc'.'z,-- ' ' :i-i- LC, l -7 -' * -.-. ". i:rt:- ' ZURICH INSURANCE (GUAM), INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, VS. VIVIAN J. SANTOS, Defendant- Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. SIDNEY DULEI BORJA, ) Supreme Court Case No. CVA ) Superior Court Case No. SP Petitioner-Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM SIDNEY DULEI BORJA, Supreme Court Case No. CVA 97-053 Superior Court Case No. SP0051-95 Petitioner-Appellant, vs. EDUARDO C. BITANGA, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ALLENTON BROWNE, Appellant/Defendant, v. LAURA L.Y. GORE, Appellee/Plaintiff. Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 155/2010 (STX On Appeal from the Superior
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. MARK BAMBA ANGOCO, Petitioner-Appellee
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM MARK BAMBA ANGOCO, Petitioner-Appellee vs. EDUARDO C. BITANGA, Director of Corrections, Government of Guam Respondent-Appellant Supreme Court Case No. CVA99-024 Superior Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, ZACHARY RICHARD ULLOA CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION. Filed: May 7, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZACHARY RICHARD ULLOA CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellee. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA03-002 Superior Court Case No.: CF0070-02 OPINION Filed:
More informationDR. JOEL JOSEPH, Petitioner-Appellee, GUAM BOARD OF ALLIED HEALTH EXAMINERS, Respondent-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2015 Guam 4
0 0 r1t z itl :s L3 6 A$ ii: r IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM DR. JOEL JOSEPH, Petitioner-Appellee, V. GUAM BOARD OF ALLIED HEALTH EXAMINERS, Respondent-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CVA13-023 Superior
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM f. l - v- -- 4 8 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERNON PEREZ, in his official capacity as a Certifying Officer of the GUAM CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and ROBERT
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,392 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD, Appellant, and
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,392 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD, Appellant, and RICHARD A. QUILLEN, Petitioner, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR AGING AND DISABILITY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. GUAM SANK0 TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM GUAM SANK0 TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, PACIFIC MODAIR CORPORATION, TOY0 NETSU KOGYO KAISHA, LTD., and DOES I1 through X, Defendants-Appellees. Supreme Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, JOSEPH LEE PUGH, Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED OPINION ON REHEARING
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH LEE PUGH, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA15-018 Superior Court Case No.: CF0572-12 AMENDED OPINION ON REHEARING
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 15, 2017 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 15, 2017 Session 09/11/2017 OUTLOUD! INC. v. DIALYSIS CLINIC, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 16C930 Joseph P.
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 58. Pauline Reyher and Dr. Wallace Brucker, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 58 Court of Appeals No. 09CA1890 Otero County District Court No. 03CV18 Honorable M. Jon Kolomitz, Judge Pauline Reyher and Dr. Wallace Brucker, on behalf of themselves
More informationMARY ANNA SOTOMAYOR, Plaintiff/Appellee, PAULINE SOTOMAYOR-MUÑOZ, Defendant/Appellant. No. 2 CA-CV Filed March 28, 2016
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO MARY ANNA SOTOMAYOR, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. PAULINE SOTOMAYOR-MUÑOZ, Defendant/Appellant. No. 2 CA-CV 2015-0156 Filed March 28, 2016 Appeal from the Superior
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, AFIO COX, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2018 Guam 16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AFIO COX, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.: CRA15-027 Superior Court Case No.: CF0026-12 OPINION Cite as: 2018 Guam 16 Appeal
More informationSUPREME COURT COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. APLUS CO., LTD, Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant/Appellee,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS APLUS CO., LTD, Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant/Appellee, v. NIIZEKI INTERNATIONAL SAIPAN CO., LTD., f.k.a. NIIZEKI SAIPAN CO.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM CRAFTWORLD INTERIORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant vs. KING ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Supreme Court Case No.: CVA97-043 Superior Court Case No.:CV0914-94
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 23, 2019 Elisabeth A.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0061p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationAMENDED RULE 26 EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
CONSTRUCTION H. JAMES WULFSBERG, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation DAVID J. HYNDMAN, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation navigant.com About Navigant
More informationCourt of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Stonecrest Building Company v Chicago Title Insurance Company Docket No. 319841/319842 Amy Ronayne Krause Presiding Judge Kirsten Frank Kelly LC No. 2008-001055
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2015 Session METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AGENCY v. HOWARD ALLEN, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 14C2733
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : : : :
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 GREENBRIAR VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Appellant EQUITY LIFESTYLES, INC., MHC GREENBRIAR VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND GREENBRIAR
More informationNo SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 1974-NMSC-030, 86 N.M. 160, 521 P.2d 122 April 12, 1974 COUNSEL
1 UNITED STATES FID. & GUAR. CO. V. RATON NATURAL GAS CO., 1974-NMSC-030, 86 N.M. 160, 521 P.2d 122 (S. Ct. 1974) UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. RATON NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
More informationNo. 2 CA-CV Filed September 30, 2014
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO IN RE $70,070 IN U.S. CURRENCY No. 2 CA-CV 2014-0013 Filed September 30, 2014 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pinal County Nos. S1100CV201301076 and S1100CV201301129
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. NATHAN G. AGUIRRE, OPINION. Filed: December 1, Cite as: 2004 Guam 21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. NATHAN G. AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No. CRA03-004 Superior Court Case No. CF0325-95 OPINION Filed: December 1,
More informationDefendants/Appellants. No. 2 CA-CV Filed August 26, 2014
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO CANYON COMMUNITY BANK, AN ARIZONA BANKING CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. JAMES F. ALDERSON AND CONNIE B. ALDERSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE; ALDERSON FAMILY TRUST,
More informationCynthia F. Torp, Angel Investor Network, Inc., and Investors Choice Realty, Inc.,
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No.: 08CA1632 Larimer County District Court No. 08CV161 Honorable Terence A. Gilmore, Judge Shyanne Properties, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cynthia F. Torp,
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 6, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-00877-CV THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE, Appellee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, DENNIS CASTRO ALDAN aka DANNY CHRISTOPHER CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM THE PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DENNIS CASTRO ALDAN aka DANNY CHRISTOPHER CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court Case No. CRA17-010 Superior Court Case No. CF0244-16
More informationPEOPLE OF GUAM, OPINION
r 1 LI r. One Agana Bay Appearing for Defendant-Appellant: Terence E. Timblin, Esq. Yanza, Flynn, Timblin, LLP 446 E. Marine Corps Dr., Ste. 201 Hagâtfla, GU 96910 James C. Collins, Esq. Office of the
More informationCITY CENTER EXECUTIVE PLAZA, LLC; INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., JERRY AND CINDY ALDRIDGE, Petitioners,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE CITY CENTER EXECUTIVE PLAZA, LLC; INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., JERRY AND CINDY ALDRIDGE, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE LEE F. JANTZEN, Judge of the SUPERIOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE BUSTER JOHNSON, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MOHAVE COUNTY, a body politic, PETE BYERS, THOMAS STOCKWELL, as members of the Board of Supervisors, Mohave
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 May 2011
NO. COA10-611 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 17 May 2011 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO., as Subrogee of JASON TORRANCE, Plaintiff, v. Orange County No. 09 CVS 1643 DURAPRO; WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM HEIDI CASTINO dba UNI-ARC, S.K. CONSTRUCTION, INC., HUA SHENG INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LTD., YEONG SUN KIM dba SUN ELECTRICAL SERVICES, JONG LJL HONG dba UL H. CONSTRUCTION, PAN
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Affirmed; Opinion Filed January 10, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00118-CV THOMAS J. GRANATA, II, Appellant V. MICHAEL KROESE AND JUSTIN HILL, Appellees On Appeal
More informationORDER RE: Appeal of County Court s Dismissal. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff s appeal of the County Court s Order re:
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiff-Appellant: The City and County of Denver v. Defendant-Appellee: Troy Daniel Holm DATE FILED: October
More information2018 CO 81. No. 16S721, Ybarra v. Greenberg & Sada, P.C. Finance, Banking, and Credit Insurance Statutory Interpretation Torts.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dugout, LLC, The Doc. 22 Civil Action No. 13-cv-00821-CMA-CBS JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE DUGOUT, LLC, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL:02/07/2014 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationNo CV. On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC A
Reverse and Render and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-10-01349-CV HARRIS, N.A., Appellant V. EUGENIO OBREGON, Appellee On Appeal from the
More informationRICHARD J. MONTELIONE, J.:
CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS: PART 41 Z.M.S. & Y. Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Nicola Farauharson, -against- Geico General Insurance Co., Plaintiff, Defendant. RICHARD J. MONTELIONE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GLENN E. SHEALEY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendants. SAYLOR, J. Civil Action No. 12-10723-FDS
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0701n.06. Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0701n.06 Case No. 14-6269 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RON NOLLNER and BEVERLY NOLLNER, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, SOUTHERN
More informationCase 2:08-cv LED-RSP Document 474 Filed 08/05/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 22100
Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 474 Filed 08/05/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 22100 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, PATRICK MUNA CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION. Cite as: 2016 Guam 16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PEOPLE OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK MUNA CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Cite as: 2016 Guam 16 Supreme Court Case No.: CRA15-014 Superior Court Case No.: CF0296-12
More informationCHALMERS HARDENBERGH PATRONS OXFORD INSURANCE COMPANY. [ 1] Patrons Oxford Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2013 ME 68 Docket: Cum-12-387 Argued: April 11, 2013 Decided: July 16, 2013 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN,
More informationv No Monroe Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PRIME TIME INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTING, INC., UNPUBLISHED October 23, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 338564 Monroe Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2016COA5 Court of Appeals No. 14CA2063 City and County of Denver District Court No. 13CV33491 Honorable Robert L. McGahey, Jr., Judge Libertarian Party of Colorado and Gordon
More informationCase 0:14-cv KMM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2015 Page 1 of 8
Case 0:14-cv-62567-KMM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2015 Page 1 of 8 TRACY SANBORN and LOUIS LUCREZIA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationROBERT PHILLIPS, Plaintiff/Appellee, CRAIG E. GARCIA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ROBERT PHILLIPS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. CRAIG E. GARCIA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 14-0239 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2012-090337
More informationSCWC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
SCWC-12-0000870 Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000870 24-APR-2013 03:00 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ASSOCIATION OF CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS OF TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by its
More informationSUPREME COURT COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, Plaintiff/Appellant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS FOR PUBLICATION COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CALISTRO CRISOSTIMO, GEORGE AGUON, AND JEROME
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 25, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 25, 2014 Session ANTONIUS HARRIS ET AL. v. TENNESSEE REHABILITATIVE INITIATIVE IN CORRECTION ET AL. Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission No.
More informationCertiorari Denied, No. 28,915, November 10, 2004 Released for Publication November 24, COUNSEL
1 VILLAGE OF LOS RANCHOS BD. OF TRUSTEES V. SANCHEZ, 2004-NMCA-128, 136 N.M. 528, 101 P.3d 339 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF LOS RANCHOS DE ALBUQUERQUE and CYNTHIA TIDWELL, Planning and Zoning
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM PETER S. DUMALIANG, RUDOLPH DEVERA, RODULFO CALIMLIM, CELY AQUINO, THELMA BARROZO, MYRNA RIVO, FEDERICO FLORES, JAMIE MONTANO, JOSE CARRERA, and EVELYN GALANG, Petitioners-Appellees,
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS. Colorado Air Quality Control Commission; and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment,
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA26 Court of Appeals No. 16CA1867 Logan County District Court No. 16CV30061 Honorable Charles M. Hobbs, Judge Sterling Ethanol, LLC; and Yuma Ethanol, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationCase 1:16-cv JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiffs,
Case 116-cv-03852-JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- COMCAST CORPORATION,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No.
14 781 cv Cohen v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No. 14 781 cv x ELIOT COHEN,
More information