DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER APRIL 2015 INSIDE THIS ISSUE
|
|
- Rose Gordon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER APRIL 2015 INSIDE THIS ISSUE FBI Mishandles Evidence Page 1 Recent Third Circuit and Supreme Court Cases Page 3 The 24 th Annual Maureen Kearney Rowley CJA Panel Training Seminar On Friday, May 1, 2015, the Federal Community Defender Office and the United States District Court for the EDPA will host The 24 th Annual Maureen Kearney Rowley CJA Panel Training Seminar for CJA Panel members, Federal Defenders, and other federal criminal defense practitioners. FBI Tells Prosecutors That Bureau s Mishandling of Evidence May Require Disclosure to Defendants by Leslie H. Jones-Collins, Paralegal, Trial Unit Beset by problems is how an internal investigation report characterized the FBI s evidence collection and retention system. As a result, the FBI is alerting prosecutors around the country to inform defense teams of errors in evidence handling, as reported by the New York Times last December in an article titled, F.B.I. Evidence is Often Mishandled, an Internal Inquiry Finds. The agency was concerned that failure to do so could lead to evidence being inadmissible or acquittals, since lawyers can use even minor record-keeping discrepancies to get evidence thrown out of court. According to the report obtained by the New York Times, most of the mistakes appeared to stem from the FBI s transition from a paper-based case system to the Sentinel computer system in FBI chief spokesman Michael Kortan stated, The FBI identified issues primarily related to the migration of its earlier record-keeping process to its updated case management system. The Bureau believed that Sentinel would streamline investigations and make it easier for analysts and agents to link cases with similar information through expanded search capabilities. To ensure proper registration, please submit registration form and fee in advance to Jennifer Nimmons Herman. FBI MISHANDLES EVIDENCE CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 Editors Jennifer Nimmons Herman Attorney Advisor Kimberly Campoli Paralegal/Panel Administrator Federal Community Defender Office for the Eastern District of PA Helen Marino, First Assistant Federal Defender Nina Carpiniello Spizer, Chief, Trial Unit Elizabeth Toplin, Assistant Chief, Trial Unit Brett Sweitzer, Chief of Appeals
2 APRIL 2015 PAGE 2 However, with respect to more serious errors, such as those involving the disappearance of evidence, auditors wrote that a majority of the errors identified were due, in large part, to human error, attributable to a lack of training and program management oversight. The New York Times reports that based on a review of more than 41,000 pieces of evidence scrutinized by auditors, there were errors with almost half of them. The mistakes identified ranged from computer glitches to 1,600 pieces of evidence being removed from storage and not returned for several months by agents. In fact, in one case involving drugs, the evidence had been signed out for more than a decade. Beyond evidence being mishandled and mislabeled, or going missing, the internal audit also found that FBI evidence lockers contained less money and valuables than documented. The Bureau also had two tons of drugs that weren t reflected in its records. Indeed, audit results from Newark, Honolulu, Milwaukee, Washington and Richmond, Virginia, revealed that more than 70 percent of the firearms in evidence in those offices had been mishandled. Given the importance of FBI evidence in criminal investigations, as well the potential complications the findings of the probe might have on future prosecutions, the agency s chief spokesperson said the FBI would start strengthening procedures in field offices across the country to improve administrative consistency and record-keeping, as a consequence of the internal inquiry. Practitioners should keep this New York Times article in mind when facing evidence challenges. To read, F.B.I. Evidence is Often Mishandled, and Internal Inquiry Finds, in full, click link
3 APRIL 2015 PAGE 3 Recent Third Circuit and Supreme Court Cases Christofer Bates, RWA, EDPA Supreme Court Sarbanes-Oxley Act / Destruction of Tangible Object to Obstruct a Federal Investigation Yates v. United States, 135 S. Ct (2015). Jeffrey M. Lindy, Esquire CJA Panel Representative Eastern District of PA Please contact Jeff Lindy with any CJA issues, comments, or concerns: Lindy & Tauber 1221 Locust Street Third Floor Philadelphia, PA (215) jlindy@lindylawfirm.com (1) A tangible object, within the meaning of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act s anti-shredding provision, 18 U.S.C. 1519, covers objects that one can use to record or preserve information. (2) Disposal of an undersized fish did not involve the destruction of a tangible object for purposes of criminal liability under 18 U.S.C Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders / Fourth Amendment / Searches Grady v. North Carolina, --- S. Ct. ---, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2124 (Mar. 30, 2015) A state conducts a search when it attaches a device to a person s body, without consent, for the purpose of tracking that individual s movements, whether the monitoring is civil or criminal in nature. Grady had previously been ordered by a state court to submit to satellite-based monitoring as a recidivist sex offender. The Supreme Court remanded this case to the North Carolina courts to determine whether the monitoring was a reasonable search. RECENT 3d CIR CASES CONTINUED ON PAGE 4
4 APRIL 2015 PAGE 4 Cert. Granted Conspiracy to Commit Extortion PAGE 5 Ocasio v. United States, No (Cert. Granted Mar. 2, 2015). ISSUE: NOTE: Whether a conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy. It appears only the Fourth and Sixth Circuits have considered this issue. Third Circuit Facially Invalid Search Warrant / Exclusionary Rule / Officer Culpability United States v. Wright, 777 F.3d 635 (3d Cir. 2015). The agent in this case violated the Fourth Amendment s particularity requirement by executing a search warrant for Wright s home that lacked the list of items to be searched for and seized. That list was in a probable cause affidavit presented to, and approved by, the magistrate, but was removed before execution and placed under seal to protect an ongoing investigation. However, the Third Circuit held that the agent s conduct did not warrant suppression of the evidence because it did not rise to the level of gross negligence. The Third Circuit has synthesized the Supreme Court s opinions in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) and Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), explaining that when a warrant is so facially deficient that it fails to particularize the things to be seized, the officers are usually at least grossly negligent and cannot rely on the good faith exception to save the search. However, this is not a categorical rule. The district court must evaluate the totality of the circumstances and consider any defects in the warrant, as well as the officer s conduct in obtaining and executing the warrant and what the officer knew or should have known. The court should also consider the extent to which the violation undermined the purposes of the Fourth Amendment and what the government gained from the violation, which are both relevant to the deterrence rationale underlying the exclusionary rule. The Third Circuit defined gross negligence as the lack of even scant care and the failure to exercise even that care which a careless person would use. RECENT 3d CIR CASES CONTINUED ON PAGE 5
5 APRIL 2015 PAGE 5 The Fourth Amendment s particularity requirement provides written assurance that the magistrate judge actually found probable cause to search for and seize every item mentioned, prohibits general searches, and informs the subject of the search of the lawful authority of the executing officers and the limits on their power to search. The search here was properly supervised by the case agent, who assured that the other officers confined their search in accordance with the warrant s limits. Second, it was clear the magistrate judge found probable cause as to each item to be searched for and seized, because when the warrant was approved, the affidavit was attached and incorporated a detailed list of items to be searched for and seized. Although the third purpose of the particularity requirement was undercut by the agents actions, the Court explained it is unclear how Wright was harmed by his inability to read the list of items the agents sought to search for and seize. Thus, the government gained nothing from this Fourth Amendment violation. The Third Circuit noted that only if mistakes like this one recur with some frequency will a defendant be in a position to argue that suppression is warranted.
6 DEFENSE LINK APRIL 2015 PAGE 5 Leigh M. Skipper, Chief Federal Defender Helen Marino, First Assistant Federal Defender Nina Carpiniello Spizer, Chief, Trial Unit Elizabeth Toplin, Assistant Chief, Trial Unit Brett Sweitzer, Chief of Appeals Federal Community Defender Office For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Suite 540 West The Curtis Center 601 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA Phone (215) Contact Jennifer Nimmons Herman if you have a new address, office address, or telephone number, for any CJA Panel related questions, or if you wish to withdraw from the CJA Panel for the EDPA. Jennifer_N_Herman@fd.org WANT MORE? VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT AND THE THIRD CIRCUIT BLOG AT RECENT 3d CIR CASES CONTINUED ON PAGE 8
DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER NOVEMBER 2014 INSIDE THIS ISSUE
DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER NOVEMBER 2014 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Collateral Consequences Resource Center Launches Website Page 1 Recent Third
More informationDEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS. Johnson Update LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER DECEMBER 2017 INSIDE THIS ISSUE
DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER DECEMBER 2017 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Johnson Update Page 1 Recent Third Circuit and Supreme Court Cases Page
More informationUSA v. Michael Wright
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-6-2015 USA v. Michael Wright Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationDEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER MARCH 2017 INSIDE THIS ISSUE
DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER MARCH 2017 INSIDE THIS ISSUE U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Naturalized Citizen May be Deported on
More informationDEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER MARCH Clemency Project 2014
DEFENSE LINK MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR CJA PANEL ATTORNEYS LEIGH M. SKIPPER, CHIEF FEDERAL DEFENDER MARCH 2014 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Clemency Project 2014 Page 1 Filing a Clemency Petition: First Steps Page 2
More informationUSA v. Michael Wright
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-16-2012 USA v. Michael Wright Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-3552 Follow this and
More informationRECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES
RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES May 1, 2014 Christofer Bates, EDPA SUPREME COURT I. Terry Stops / Reasonable Suspicion / Anonymous Tips / Drunk Driving Navarette v. California, --- S. Ct.
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JONATHAN BALL. Argued: June 13, 2012 Opinion Issued: September 28, 2012
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
US v. Kenneth Watford Doc. 406531135 Appeal: 15-4637 Doc: 86 Filed: 05/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 7 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-4637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-8-2007 USA v. Ladner Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1228 Follow this and additional
More informationMay Jacob Schuman Research & Writing Specialist Federal Community Defender Office, E.D. Pa.
Appellate Update May 2018 Jacob Schuman Research & Writing Specialist Federal Community Defender Office, E.D. Pa. Supreme Court Decisions Sessions v. Dimaya 138 S.Ct. 1204 (2018) Facts Dimaya is an LPR
More informationI. Introduction. fact that most people carry a cell phone, there has been relatively little litigation deciding
CELL PHONE SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS: THE NEW FRONTIER ANDREA KLIKA I. Introduction In the age of smart phones, what once was a simple device to make phone calls has become a personal computer that stores a
More informationOFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE
OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE Criminal Cases Decided Between May 1 and September 28, 2009, and Granted Review for the October
More informationHuman Rights Defense Center
Human Rights Defense Center DEDICATED TO PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS SENT VIA MAIL AND ELECTRONICALLY Robert Hinchman, Senior Counsel Office of Legal Policy U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue,
More informationTop 10 Tips for Responding to Search Warrants: Before, During, and After
Top 10 Tips for Responding to Search Warrants: Before, During, and After Despite the large number of search warrants executed upon companies each year, the vast majority of companies never suspect that
More informationCrisis Management Initial Response Checklist
. Memorandum TO: FROM: General Counsel Chief Compliance Officer Joshua Berman and Gil Soffer DATE: June 15, 2010 SUBJECT: Crisis Management Initial Response Checklist The subpoena and communications you
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2015 USA v. David Calhoun Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARMANDO GARCIA v. Petitioner, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals (7th Cir.)
More informationTHE FEDERAL CORNER. Tim (The Magician) Henry Gets an Unbelievable Result In a Child Pornography Case You Won t Believe It!
THE FEDERAL CORNER Tim (The Magician) Henry Gets an Unbelievable Result In a Child Pornography Case You Won t Believe It! Buck Files Jason Wayne Irving was a Kansas registered sex offender who had child
More informationCase , Document 90, 08/14/2014, , Page1 of United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Docket No.
Case 12-240, Document 90, 08/14/2014, 1295247, Page1 of 32 12-240 To Be Argued By: SARALA V. NAGALA United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No. 12-240 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
More informationBest Practice: Evidence Storage and Destruction
I. Background: Exhibits received into evidence during a court proceeding becomes the responsibility of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. This exclusive control also carries with it the responsibility of
More informationThe Process. Ten federal disqualifiers United States Code Section 922. State Law defines state disqualifiers Florida Statute 790.
The Process Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Conducts required background checks for Federal Firearm Licensees to determine the potential transferee s eligibility to receive the firearm. Ten
More informationUSA v. Devlon Saunders
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-30-2012 USA v. Devlon Saunders Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-1635 Follow this and
More informationIt s the End of the World as We Know It And I Feel Fine: Hudson, Herring, and the Future of the Exclusionary Rule. Jamesa J. Drake
It s the End of the World as We Know It And I Feel Fine: Hudson, Herring, and the Future of the Exclusionary Rule Jamesa J. Drake In the March issue of the Advocate, I discuss the evolution of the exclusionary
More informationLINDY & TAUBER Attorneys at Law
LINDY & TAUBER Attorneys at Law 1221 Locust Street, Third Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 215.575.0702 (tel) 215.320.7519 (fax) www.lindyandtauber.com To: From: Honorable Kathleen Cardone, Chair
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2002 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-14-2002 USA v. Stewart Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 1-2037 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002
More informationIn the United States District Court For the Northern District of Ohio
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Ohio Carrie Harkless, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Jennifer Brunner, et al., Case No. 1:06-CV-2284 Judge Gaughan Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli
More informationClass Actions. Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act by Marc J. Goldstein Marc J. Goldstein Litigation and Arbitration Chambers New York,
More informationCase 1:10-cr RDB Document 75 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 75 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND v. * Criminal No. 10-0181-RDB THOMAS ANDREWS DRAKE
More informationRECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES
RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES March 6, 2013 Christofer Bates, EDPA SUPREME COURT I. Aiding and Abetting / Accomplice Liability / 924(c) Rosemond v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 2014 WL 839184
More information: No Disciplinary Docket No. 3. No. 39 DB : Attorney Registration No : (Philadelphia) ORDER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of : No. 1150 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 RONALD I. KAPLAN No. 39 DB 2005 : Attorney Registration No. 34822 PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Philadelphia)
More informationJUNE 2002 Federal Defender Newsletter
Quin Denvir Federal Defender OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 801 K STREET, 10th Floor SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 Daniel J. Broderick (916) 498-5700 Fax: (916) 498-5710 Chief
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, 3:-01-CR-246-P v. XXX XXX, Defendant. MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL ITEMS SEIZED
More informationCase 1:14-cr SS Document 50 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURI Western District of Texas AUSTIN DIVISION
AO 24E1 B (Rev. O/O5)(W.D.T.) - Judgment in a Criminal Case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case 1:14-cr-00213-SS Document 50 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURI Western District of Texas
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) is to assist the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Waters Corporation
More informationPrivacy: An Abbreviated Outline of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping
Privacy: An Abbreviated Outline of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping Gina Stevens Legislative Attorney Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law October 9,
More informationGREENWOOD HALL, INC.
I. PURPOSE This Charter governs the operations and organization of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of Greenwood Hall, Inc. (the Company ). The Committee is created by the Board of Directors of the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT VS. : APPEAL NUMBER
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Appellant, VS. : APPEAL NUMBER 05-4833 MARC RICKS : Appellee. Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Under
More informationPetitioner and Cross-Respondent, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. In the Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES, DAVID ELLIS,
In the Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES, v. Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, DAVID ELLIS, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. On Writ of Certiorari to The United States Court of Appeals For
More informationTHE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017
THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017 https://youtu.be/d8cb5wk2t-8 CAREER OFFENDER. WE WILL DISCUSS GENERAL APPLICATION ( 4B1.1) CRIME OF VIOLENCE ( 4B1.2(a))
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiffs CRIMINAL DOCKET CR-09-351 BRIAN DUNN V. HON. RICHARD P. CONABOY Defendant SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
More informationUSA v. Shakira Williams
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-20-2010 USA v. Shakira Williams Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-3306 Follow this and
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- CASEY WELBORN, v. Petitioner,
More informationCase 1:11-cr GAO Document 65 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:11-cr-10294-GAO Document 65 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) NO.11-CR-10294-GAO v. ) ) DAVID A. KEITH, ) Defendant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 16, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 16, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH HAYES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 97-C-1735 Steve
More informationUSA v. Enrique Saldana
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-30-2012 USA v. Enrique Saldana Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-1501 Follow this and
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Defendant Christopher Scott Pulsifer was convicted of possession of marijuana
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff - Appellee, TENTH CIRCUIT October 23, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v.
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 06-20885 Document: 00511188299 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/2010 06-20885 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFREY K. SKILLING, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. German, 2005-Ohio-527.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. BEN GERMAN, Defendant-Appellee. : : : :
More informationProtecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant
Protecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant By Sara Kropf, Law Office of Sara Kropf PLLC Government investigative techniques traditionally reserved for street crime cases search
More informationPRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES
PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES This Protocol is subject to change. It is expected that over time changes will be made and the Protocol will be amended. Please refer to our website at www.manitobacourts.mb.ca
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 14, 2001 v No. 224293 Oakland Circuit Court TAVARUS DOGAN, LC No. 99-166139-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADAM MALKIN, Defendant-Respondent.
More informationAmendment to the Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines January 21, 2016 Effective Date August 1, 2016 This document contains unofficial text of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual submitted to Congress, and is provided
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Shelton v. USA Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA MICHAEL J. SHELTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No.: 1:18-CV-287-CLC MEMORANDUM
More informationUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS U N I T E D S T A T E S, ) Misc. Dkt. No. 2009-15 Appellant ) ) v. ) ) ORDER Airman First Class (E-3) ) ADAM G. COTE, ) USAF, ) Appellee ) Special Panel
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge. September 14, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-5118 THOMAS GERALD DUKE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge. September
More informationDefending a Federal Criminal Case: Detention & Release. Lunchtime CLE April 3, 2015 Laine Cardarella Federal Defender, WDMO
Defending a Federal Criminal Case: Detention & Release Lunchtime CLE April 3, 2015 Laine Cardarella Federal Defender, WDMO 18 USC 3142 The default position is release on personal recognizance or unsecured
More informationNow in our 25th Year. Trusted Experts on Political Compliance Laws & Required Reporting YEARS.
Now in our 25th Year YEARS STATE AND FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. H S E R V I C E H C E L E B R AT O F C O M P L I A N C E Y E A R S I N G 2 5 Trusted Experts on Political Compliance Laws & Required Reporting
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Amended and Restated Charter AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PFSWEB, INC. (AS OF MAY 3, 2016) PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Committee
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2443 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAMIAN PATRICK, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
More informationThe Cooper Companies, Inc. Audit Committee Charter
The Cooper Companies, Inc. Audit Committee Charter Revision History DATE REVISION 16 Dec 2003 Original Approval and Adoption 14 Dec 2006 Updated to include Internal Audit Oversight 27 Oct 2011 Updated
More informationMuse B. v. Upper Darby Sch Dist
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-27-2008 Muse B. v. Upper Darby Sch Dist Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-1739 Follow
More informationCase 5:16-cr XR Document 52 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:16-cr-00008-XR Document 52 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ZACHARY AUSTIN HALGREN,
More informationMICHAEL DONNELL WARD OPINION BY v. Record Number JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE January 12, 2007 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
PRESENT: All the Justices MICHAEL DONNELL WARD OPINION BY v. Record Number 060788 JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE January 12, 2007 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Michael Donnell
More informationDISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES OF CLARCOR INC. These Disclosure Controls and Procedures have been designed with the objective of ensuring that:
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES OF CLARCOR INC. Objectives These Disclosure Controls and Procedures have been designed with the objective of ensuring that: corporate disclosure is accurate in all material
More informationThe Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Clayton Bruce Williams
2010 LSBC 31 Report issued: December 22, 2010 Citation issued: August 5, 2010 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning Clayton
More informationWhen a State Felony is not A Federal Felony. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
When a State Felony is not A Federal Felony Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder Federal Felony Definition, generally: a conviction punishable by a term that exceeds one year imprisonment If the term exceeding
More informationCRIMES CODE (18 PA.C.S.) AND JUDICIAL CODE (42 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Nov. 29, 2006, P.L. 1567, No. 178 Cl. 18
CRIMES CODE (18 PA.C.S.) AND JUDICIAL CODE (42 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Nov. 29, 2006, P.L. 1567, No. 178 Cl. 18 Session of 2006 No. 2006-178 SB 944 AN ACT Amending Titles 18 (Crimes and Offenses)
More informationRespect Your Universe, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal
More informationEXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. Adopted December 14, 2011, as amended as of September 7, 2016
EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Adopted December 14, 2011, as amended as of September 7, 2016 The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Express Scripts Holding Company (the Company
More informationPrivacy Policy. This Privacy Policy sets out the Law Society's policies in relation to the management of Personal Information.
Privacy Policy Law Society of South Australia Privacy Policy The Law Society of South Australia (Law Society or we, us or our) deals with information privacy in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
More informationSEIZURE Effective Date: May 9, 2005
SOUTH COAST BRITISH COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY POLICE SERVICE SEIZURE Effective Date: May 9, 2005 POLICY 1. Seizure will be undertaken only when clearly authorized by law or with express consent.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 16, 2013 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 16, 2013 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA SHANE HAYES Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2006-B-1092, 2011-B-1047
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 188 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID 5418 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 06-1385 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, NING WEN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION -vs- BRANDY NICOLE NEELEY Case No.: 13-00014-04-CR-W-DW USM Number: 25077-045
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. 5D02-503
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-503 JAMES OTTE Appellee. / ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH DISTRICT AND THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL
More informationExcerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery
Excerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery 1. Excerpt from Volume 1, Pretrial, of NC Defender Manual: Discusses procedures for obtaining records from third parties and rules governing subpoenas
More informationFederal Rule of Evidence 408 and Criminal Cases
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2011 Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and Criminal Cases Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University Law School, SSALTZ@law.gwu.edu Follow
More informationCASE NO. 1D James T. Miller, and Laura Nezami, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JEFFREY SCOTT FAWDRY, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Richard Montgomery appeals the district court s denial of his motion for a new
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT January 3, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. Plaintiff-Appellee, No.
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE
Case: 13-10650, 08/17/2015, ID: 9649625, DktEntry: 42, Page 1 of 19 No. 13-10650 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERRIELL ELLIOTT TALMORE, Defendant-Appellant.
More information4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014
4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014 PART B - CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINAL LIVELIHOOD 4B1.1. Career Offender (a) (b) A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10 Q/A. Amendment No. 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10 Q/A Amendment No. 1 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly
More informationon significant health issues pertaining to their products, and of encouraging the
Number 836 March 17, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Wyeth v. Levine and the Contours of Conflict Preemption Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act The decision in Wyeth reinforces the importance
More informationFraud. Original Implementation: January 28, 1997 Last Revision: November 2, 2015 INTRODUCTION
Fraud Original Implementation: January 28, 1997 Last Revision: November 2, 2015 INTRODUCTION This policy establishes procedures and responsibilities for detecting, reporting, and resolving instances of
More informationELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE. Attacking Insider Trading and Other White Collar Cases Built on Evidence From Government Wiretaps: The Nuts and Bolts
Criminal Law Reporter Reproduced with permission from The Criminal Law Reporter, 92 CrL 550, 02/13/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com ELECTRONIC
More informationALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER. (Adopted on September 2, 2014 by the Board of Directors)
I. PURPOSE ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (Adopted on September 2, 2014 by the Board of Directors) The Audit Committee (the Committee ) of Alibaba Group
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 HOUSE BILL 1403 RATIFIED BILL
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 HOUSE BILL 1403 RATIFIED BILL AN ACT TO REQUIRE THAT A DNA SAMPLE BE TAKEN FROM ANY PERSON ARRESTED FOR COMMITTING CERTAIN OFFENSES, AND TO AMEND THE STATUTES
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE COURTS AND CORRECTIONS / PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE COURTS AND CORRECTIONS / PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform The Act ends the practice of civil forfeiture but preserves criminal forfeiture, in which property
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2013 STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-21-2014 USA v. Robert Cooper Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 09-2159 Follow this and additional
More informationSEAN J. KEALY CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF LAW BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BOSTON, MA (617)
CURRICULUM VITAE SEAN J. KEALY CLINICAL ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF LAW BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BOSTON, MA 02215 (617) 353-8373 skealy@bu.edu EDUCATION TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, J.D. cum laude
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re: Two accounts stored at Google, Case No. 17-M-1235 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Information associated with one Yahoo email address that is stored at premises controlled by Yahoo Case No. 17-M-1234 In re: Two email
More informationAudit Committee Charter Tyson Foods, Inc.
Approved by the Audit Committee on 8/2/17 Approved by the Board of Directors on 8/10/17 Audit Committee Charter Tyson Foods, Inc. I. PURPOSE The primary function of the Audit Committee (the "Committee")
More informationCRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY: PROTECTING DATA AND RIGHTS
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY: PROTECTING DATA AND RIGHTS JUNE 8, 2017 Bracewell LLP makes this information available for educational purposes. This information does not offer specific legal advice
More informationOn Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 42-9001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES, Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, v. DAVID ELLIS, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. 93,784 RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STANLEY SHADLER, Petitioner, v. Case No. 93,784 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF On Review from the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida
More information