E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO CA TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST AMERICAN FLOOD DATA SERVICES, INC., CENTURY 21 MASELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC., CINDY SMITH, COLDWELL BANKER GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC., CINDY LAI, MARK S. BOUNDS REALTY PARTNERS, INC., DONALD CONN, JR., AND WAYNE C. WILLIAMS APPELLEES BRIEF OF APPELLEES COLDWELL BANKER GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND CINDY LAI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Lee Ann Thigpen (MSB #100229) Jim Warren (MSB #6966) CARROLL WARREN & PARKER PLLC 188 East Capitol Street, Suite 1200 Post Office Box 1005 Jackson, Mississippi Telephone: Facsimile: i

2 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO CA TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST AMERICAN FLOOD DATA SERVICES, INC., CENTURY 21 MASELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC., CINDY SMITH, COLDWELL BANKER GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC., CINDY LAI, MARK S. BOUNDS REALTY PARTNERS, INC., DONALD CONN, JR., AND WAYNE C. WILLIAMS APPELLEES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record, in accordance with Rules 28(1)(1) and 28(c) of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure, certifies that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. 1. Tony L. Smith and Linda N. Smith Appellants; 2. John Hendon Defendant (no appearance entered); 3. Union Planters Bank and its successors Defendant, but not Appellee; 4. First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, LP., Successor in Interest to First American Flood Data Services, Inc. Defendant, but not Appellee; 5. Century 21 Maselle & Associates, Inc. Defendant, but not Appellee (in arbitration); 6. Cindy Smith Defendant, but not Appellee (in arbitration); ii

3 7. Coldwell Banker Graham & Associates, Inc. Appellee; 8. Linda Graham, principal broker of Coldwell Banker Graham & Associates, Inc.; 9. Cindy Lai Appellee; 10. Mark S. Bounds Realty Partners, Inc. Appellee; 11. Donald Conn, Jr. Appellee; 12. Wayne C. Williams Appellee; 13. Donald W. Boykin Attorney for Appellants; 14. Jim Warren attorney for Appellees, Coldwell Banker Graham & associates, Inc. and Cindy Lai; 15. Lee Ann Thigpen Attorney for Appellees, Coldwell Banker Graham & associates, Inc. and Cindy Lai; 16. Robert J. Curtis Attorney for John Hendon as Defendant (no appearance entered herein); 17. Troy Odom. Blair & Bondurant Attorney for Donald Conn, Jr.; 18. Joe S. Deaton, III Attorney for Century 21 Maselle & Associates, Inc., Cindy Smith (Defendants in arbitration), Wayne C. Williams and Mark S. Bounds Realty Partners, Inc. (Appellees); 19. Michael Chad Moore Attorney for Wayne C. Williams and Mark S. Bounds Realty Partners, Inc. Appellees; and 20. Honorable Winston Kidd- Hinds County Circuit Judge. Dates: December 1, 2017 iii

4 iv /s/ Lee Ann Thigpen Lee Ann Thigpen Attorney of Record for Coldwell Banker Graham & Associates and Cindy Lai

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS.. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS... v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. vi STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT... vii I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW. 3 IV. ARGUMENT.. 4 A. The Appellants inaction reflects a clear record of delay... 5 B. Explicit consideration of lesser sanctions is not required, however, the trial court previously denied two motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute, while admonishing Appellants to push their case. This is the equivalent of lesser sanctions C. A finding of prejudice is not required, but prejudice can be implied from the delay 8 V. CONCLUSION... 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.. 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE v

6 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Am. Tel. & Tel. v. Days Inn of Winona 720 So. 2d 178 (Miss. 1998).. 3 Collins v. Koppers, Inc. 59 So. 3d 582 (Miss. 2011) 7 Hensarling v. Holly 972 So. 2d 716 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) 4 Holder v. Orange Grove Med. Specialties, P.A. 54 So. 3d 192 (Miss. 2010) 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Holmes v. Grisby No CA COA, 2015 WL (Miss. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2015) 6, 7, 8 Manning v. King s Daughters Med. Ctr. 138 So. 3d 109 (Miss. 2014)... 6 Rogers v. Kroger Co. 669 F.2d 317 (5th Cir. 1982).. 4 State ex rel. Hood v. Louisville Tire Ctr. Inc. 204 So. 3d 1250 (Miss. 2016). 4 Wallace v. Jones 572 So. 2d 371 (Miss. 1990)... 4 Watson v. Lillard 493 So. 2d 1277 (Miss. 1986). 4 Rules: Miss. R. Civ. P vii, 4, 6, 7, 8 vi

7 STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 34, Appellees Coldwell Banker Graham and Associates, Inc. and Cindy Lai respectfully submit that oral argument is not necessary in this appeal. The primary issue before the Court is a basic and well-settled issue of the trial court s discretion to dismiss Appellants lawsuit for failure to prosecute pursuant to Mississippi Rule 41(b), and more broadly, to dismiss based on its inherent authority to efficiently manage its docket. Appellants have failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing their lawsuit. While Appellees welcome the opportunity to argue this matter before the Court, oral argument is not necessary in this appeal as the substantive facts are not in dispute and issue of the trial court s discretion to dismiss for failure to prosecute has been decided previously by this Court, and supports Appellees position. vii

8 Appellees, Coldwell Banker Graham & Associates, Inc. and Cindy Lai (collectively Coldwell Banker and Lai ), submit their Appellees Brief as follows: I. INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from the Hinds County Circuit Court s grant of Appellees Motion to Dismiss the Appellants lawsuit for failure to prosecute their claims. As discussed in more detail below, throughout the life of their lawsuit, Appellants repeatedly failed to prosecute their claims (either failing to timely participate in discovery or otherwise move the case forward), allowing years to pass without any action in the case. Appellants failed to carry their burden at the trial court and could not show that they had timely prosecuted their lawsuit. Likewise, Appellants fail to carry their burden on appeal which requires a showing of abuse of discretion by the trial court. The trial court s dismissal of Appellants lawsuit for failure to prosecute was proper and should be affirmed. II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The entirety of this lawsuit (since its initial filing in November 2004) has been punctuated with Appellees attempts to require Appellants engage in and prosecute their care. The docket reflects clear and repeated failure of Appellants to prosecute their claims. In fact, as discussed below, the record reflects that Appellants have gone years at a time without taking any action in the case, and when they do act, it is only in response to Appellants request to dismiss the case. For these reasons and as more comprehensively discussed herein, the Court should find that dismissal was proper and appropriate and affirm the trial court s ruling. Appellants Tony and Linda Smith filed their suit on November 4, R. Vol. 1 at p. 2; R.E. 1. The First Amended Complaint was filed in January R. Vol. 1 at p Between the filing of their suit and approximately August 2007, the parties litigated over the issue of arbitration, bringing the issue to this Court for resolution. R. Vol. 1 at p. 3-4, p. 24, p. 27, and 29; R.E. 1. In August 2007, the Mississippi Supreme Court ordered the Plaintiffs to arbitrate their 1

9 disputes with two defendants, Century 21 Maselle & Associates, Inc. and Cindy Smith. R. Vol. 1 at p. 6; R.E. 1. Those initial defendants are not parties to this appeal. The remaining defendants, including Coldwell Banker and Lai, were not ordered to arbitration and this matter was not stayed. Following remand back to the trial court, Coldwell Banker and Lai began to attempt to participate in discovery with Appellants. In 2008, Coldwell Banker and Lai attempted to take Appellants depositions but the depositions had to be rescheduled multiple times due to Appellants refusal to respond to written discovery. R. Vol. 1 at p. 6-7; R.E. 1. In fact, in 2008 and 2009, two separate motions to compel were filed against Appellants to force them to respond to discovery. R. Vol. 1 at p and p ; R.E. 2 and 3. Finally, Appellants responded to written discovery in July 2009 after an order was entered by the trial court compelling them to respond. R. Vol. 1 at p ; R.E. 4. In August 2009, the Appellants depositions were taken. R. Vol. 1 at p ; R. Vol. 2 at p Thereafter, on September 3, 2010, Coldwell Banker and Lai filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. 1, 2 The Appellants responded by filing a Motion to Set Trial, but never set the motion for hearing or otherwise attempted to obtain a trial date. R. Vol. 1 at p. 8-10; R.E. 1; R. Vol 2 at p At the hearing on Coldwell Banker and Lai s dispositive motions, the trial court declined to grant summary judgment on the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute, at that time, with an admonishment to Appellants counsel to push the case along. However, nothing happened. 1 While the entire record from the trial court was designated in Appellee s Designation of the Record, it has come to counsel s attention that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute filed on September 13, 2010 was not included in the record transmitted to the Supreme Court by the Circuit Court Clerk. However, it is undisputed that this Motion was filed as stated, evidenced by the filed stamp on the document. As such, the document is included in Appellee s Record Excepts at Tab 5. 2 The following day, Coldwell Banker and Lai also filed a summary judgment motion. 2

10 Between August 2011 and January 2014, Appellants took no action in the case. 3 R. Vol. 5 at p. 711; R.E. 7. So, Coldwell Banker and Lai moved for a second time to dismiss Appellants case for failure to prosecute on January 24, R. Vol. 5 at p ; R.E. 6. The Plaintiffs responded by (again) filing a Motion to Set Trial on January 29, 2014, but then (again) took no action to have the motion heard or otherwise prosecute their claims. R. Vol. 1 at p ; R.E. 1; R. Vol. 5 at p Coldwell Banker and Lai s second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute was denied by the trial court. R. Vol. 5 at p. 711; R.E. 7. However, during April 17, 2014, motion hearing on the second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute the trial court again stressed to counsel for Appellants that they needed to take action with respect to their claims. R. Vol. 5 at p. 711; R.E. 7. Again, Appellants failed to do so, and another year-and-a-half passed without any effort by Appellants to prosecute their case. R. Vol. 1 at p ; R.E. 1. Coldwell Banker and Lai then filed a third Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute on November 7, 2015, which was granted by the trial court on June 27, R. Vol. 5 at p and p ; R.E. 7 and 8. It is from the trial court s order dismissing Appellants lawsuit for failure to prosecute that this appeal arises. III. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Court employs an abuse-of-discretion standard when reviewing a trial court s dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). Holder v. Orange Grove Med. Specialties, P.A., 54 So.3d 192, 196 (Miss. 2010) (citing Am. Tel. & Tel. v. Days Inn of Winona, 3 Appellants make reference to a stay or delay due to a bankruptcy filing by John Hendon. Appellees Coldwell Banker and Lai are unaware of any delay related to bankruptcy by John Hendon, and are unaware of any filing with the trial court related to a stay in that regard. To Appellees knowledge, no stay regarding Mr. Hendon s alleged bankruptcy was ever put in place at the trial court. 3

11 720 So.2d 178, 180 (Miss. 1998)). The power to dismiss for failure to prosecute is an inherent power in any court of law or equity and has been regarded as a means necessary to control the court s docket and promote the orderly expedition of justice. Hensarling v. Holly, 972 So.2d 716, (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) (citing Watson v. Lillard, 493 So.2d 1277, 1278 (Miss. 1986)). What constitutes failure to prosecute depends on the facts of the particular case. Wallace v. Jones, 572 So.2d 371, 376 (Miss. 1990) (citing Rogers v. Kroger Co., 669 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1982)). In analyzing the dismissal of a case pursuant to Rule 41(b), the Court should look to see if there is a record of dilatory or contumacious conduct by Appellants. State ex rel. Hood v. Louisville Tire Ctr. Inc., 204 So.3d 1250, 124 (Miss. 2016) (citing Holder, 54 So.3d at 197 ( 18)). The Court also may consider aggravating factors or actual prejudice to the Appellees, but the presence of the factors or prejudice is not necessary to affirm dismissal. Id. IV. ARGUMENT Appellants have failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in granting Appellee s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Miss. R. Civ. P. 41(b) allows a defendant in a civil action to move for involuntary dismissal of an action for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute. Miss. R. Civ. P 41(b). The trial court dismissed the Appellants lawsuit based upon their dilatory and contumacious conduct. In order to reverse the trial court s decision, this Court would have to determine that the trial court abused its discretion. Appellants cannot make that showing. 4

12 a. The Appellants inaction reflects a clear record of delay. A clear record of delay is sufficient to justify dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b). Holder, 54 So. 3d at 198 (noting that [t]he standard is whether there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff.... ) (emphasis in original). When there is a clear record of delay, no showing of contumacious conduct is necessary. Id. at 199. Further, delay alone can suffice to justify dismissal; factors other than delay are not required to affirm a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Id. Appellants actions (or inactions) during the pendency of the litigation evidence a clear record of delay as follows: Appellants repeated failures to timely respond to discovery. See R. Vol. 1 at p and p ; R.E. 2 and 3; Appellants failure to take any action to prosecute their claims against Appellees between August 2009 when Appellants depositions were taken and September 3, 2010, when the first motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute was filed. See R. Vol. 1 at p. 7; R.E. 1; Appellants failure to set their September 2010 Motion to Set Trial for hearing. See R. Vol. 1 at p. 8; R. Vol. 2 at p ; R.E. 1; Appellants failure to take any action against Appellees between August 2011 and January 2014, when the second motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute was filed. See R. Vol. 1, at p. 8-10; R. Vol. 5 at p ; R.E.1 and 6; Appellants failure to set their January 2014 Motion to Set Trial for hearing or 5

13 to otherwise prosecute their claims against Appellees. See R. Vol. 1 at p ; R. Vol. 5 at p. 696; R.E. 1; and Appellants failure to take any action against Appellees between January 2014 and November 2, 2015, when the third motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (which was granted) was filed. See R. Vol. 1 at p ; R. Vol. 5 at p ; R.E. 1 and 7. Appellants failings and inaction are exactly the type of behavior that supports dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) and a finding of clear delay. This same issue was addressed in Holder, wherein the Mississippi Supreme Court upheld the trial court s Rule 41(b) dismissal. 54 So. 3d at 201. In Holder, the Court found a clear record of delay based on the following: 1) a 435 day delay in responding to discovery; 2) a failure to initiate discovery until a year past the deadline; and 3) a failure to respond to the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute until after the ten-day limit. Id. at 197. The facts in the present action are even more egregious, as the record shows Appellants failed to prosecute their claims against Appellees on multiple occasions with each occasion spanning more than a year. See Holmes v. Grisby, No CA COA, 2015 WL , at *3 (Miss. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2015) (noting that the Mississippi Supreme Court has previously upheld a dismissal of a case for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) where the case had remained stale for more than a year ) (citing Manning v. King s Daughters Med. Ctr., 138 So. 3d 109, 117 (Miss. 2014)). As such, there is no question that there is a clear record of delay, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Appellees motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). 6

14 b. Explicit consideration of lesser sanctions is not required, however, the trial court previously denied two motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute, while admonishing Appellants to push their case. This is the equivalent of lesser sanctions. Appellants argue that the trial court failed to consider lesser sanctions against them prior to dismissing their lawsuit. However, the lack of an explicit finding in the record of consideration of lesser sanctions is not an abuse of discretion by the trial court or grounds for reversal. Holmes, 2015 WL , at *4 (affirming dismissal where trial court did not make a finding regarding lesser sanctions) (citing Collins v. Koppers, Inc., 59 So. 3d 582, 590 (Miss. 2011)). Further, Appellants fail to note that the trial court had previously denied two motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute, admonishing Appellants to push their case and giving Appellants more than five years to prosecute their case, but Appellants took no action. Therefore, while an explicit finding in the record regarding lesser sanctions is not required, arguably, the trial court already gave Appellants lesser sanctions two times previously, which they failed to take advantage of. In addition, a showing of delay or contumacious conduct is sufficient for a Rule 41(b) dismissal when a lesser sanction would not serve the best interests of justice. Holder, 54 So. 3d at 198. Here, Appellants were not only warned once, but twice, about their dilatory behavior in not prosecuting their claims when the trial court denied Appellants 2010 and 2014 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. Finally, in 2015, after enduring another year-and-a-half without action by Appellants, the trial court granted Appellee s third Motion to Dismiss. Appellants failure to heed the trial court s warnings, along with the trial court record, clearly demonstrates that a lesser sanction would not have served the best interests of justice. 7

15 c. A finding of prejudice is not required, but prejudice can be implied from the delay. The Appellants further argue that nothing in the record shows that any delay in the prosecution of the case was the fault of the Smiths. Appellants counsel also states that the delay was solely attributable to personal issues involving their counsel. However, the case had been repeatedly delayed from the time it came back to the trial court in 2007, as evidenced by motions to compel filed against the Appellants, and multiple motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute. See R , 35-52, , ; R.E. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. According to Appellants, the only reason stated by the trial court for dismissing the First Amended Complaint was delay, and Appellants argue that none of the motions claim any prejudice to any defendant. However, prejudice is implied by the significant passage of time since the lawsuit was initiated. In Holder, the Mississippi Supreme Court noted that [a]ctual prejudice is not a requirement for dismissal under Rule 41(b), but instead, held that [p]rejudice may be presumed from unreasonable delay. 54 So. 3d, at (citing Cox v. Cox, 976 So. 2d 869, (Miss. 2008)). The court noted that the case had been stale for more than a year, and the plaintiffs had failed to meet multiple discovery and procedural deadlines. Id. at 200. The record in the present matter shows an even greater delay, and prejudice is certainly presumed from the unreasonable delay. Appellants arguments that certain of their delays are attributable to their counsel is also not persuasive, as the court in Holmes dealt with a similar issue and concluded that counsel s inaction does not relinquish [appellants ] duty to prosecute their case WL , at *4 (affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute). 8

16 V. CONCLUSION There is no genuine issue of material fact present on the issue of whether Appellants timely prosecuted their claims. They did not. Years passed without any activity in the case, even after admonitions by the trial court for the Appellants to push their case forward. The delay itself of over thirteen years since the lawsuit was initiated is prejudicial to Appellees. Finally, Appellants have failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing their action. For these reasons, the Court should affirm the trial court s ruling on all issues. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this the 1st day of December, COLDWELL BANKER GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC. and CINDY LAI By: BY: CARROLL WARREN & PARKER PLLC /s/ Lee Ann Thigpen LEE ANN THIGPEN OF COUNSEL: Lee Ann Thigpen (MSB #100229) Jim Warren (MSB #6966) CARROLL WARREN & PARKER PLLC 188 East Capitol Street, Suite 1200 Post Office Box 1005 Jackson, Mississippi Telephone: Facsimile:

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned counsel of record for Appellees, Coldwell Banker Graham & Associates, Inc. and Cindy Lai, hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument has this day been served electronically via the MEC system to all counsel of record, including the following: Joe S. Deaton, III, Esq. Chris Daniel, Esq. Deaton & Daniel Post Office Box Flowood, MS Troy Odom, Esq. Blair & Bondurant Post Office Box Jackson, MS Donald W. Boykin, Esq. Attorney at Law 515 Court Street Jackson, MS Robert J. Curtis, Esq. Post Office Box 4169 Jackson, MS The undersigned counsel of record further certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and forgoing has this day been served via U.S. Mail upon the following: Honorable Winston L. Kidd Hinds County Circuit Court Judge 407 East Pascagoula St. Jackson, MS This the 1st day of December, /s/ Lee Ann Thigpen Lee Ann Thigpen 10

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2010-TS BRIEF OF APPELLEE ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2010-TS BRIEF OF APPELLEE ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2010-TS-00865 GLEN AVENT APPELLANT - PLAINTIFF VS. MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, W.G. YATES & SON CONSTRUCTION CO., AND ITT SHERATON CORPORATION

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

On Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court of Amite County, Mississippi

On Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court of Amite County, Mississippi ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY APPELLANT VS. MARTHA MOORE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIE B. MOORE, DECEASED APPELLEE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY On Interlocutory

More information

APPELLANTS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case #2015-CA-01771

APPELLANTS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case #2015-CA-01771 E-Filed Document Aug 12 2016 14:38:16 2015-CA-01771 Pages: 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case #2015-CA-01771 #201S-CA-01771 ELNORA HOLMES AND IRMA VENSON VS. vs. TERESA GRISBY PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N ca NO.2014-ca-00984

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N ca NO.2014-ca-00984 E-Filed Document Dec 23 2014 11:31:08 2014-CA-00984 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N0.2014-ca-00984 NO.2014-ca-00984 VIRGINIA ROSS, on behalf of all beneficiaries of SCOTT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 8 2015 13:57:01 2014-CP-00165-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL WALDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00165-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLANTS, JAMES D. HAVARD AND MARGARET HAVARD

BRIEF OF APPELLANTS, JAMES D. HAVARD AND MARGARET HAVARD E-Filed Document Jun 29 2015 09:34:50 2015-CA-00138 Pages: 9 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES D. HAVARD and Wife, APPELLANTS ) MARGARET HAVARD, ) ) CASE VERSUS ) NUMBER ) 2015-CA-00138 TANELLE SUMRALL,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Feb 12 2018 10:06:26 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES

More information

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TAURUS CALDWELL VS. FILED MAY 202008,,"HCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURr ~OURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2008-CP-0150 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Jun 1 2018 09:30:47 2016-CT-00928-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 3 2017 12:58:02 2015-CA-01650-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA-01650 DERRICK DORTCH APPELLANT vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. E-Filed Document Feb 21 2014 14:40:09 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS v. Cause No. 2013-CA-01004 LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.

More information

E-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jul 26 2016 13:13:30 2015-EC-01677-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TASHA DILLON APPELLANT vs. NO. 2015-CA-01677 DAVID MYERS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2009-CP-00950 MARVIN ARTHUR APPELLANT VS. TUNICA COUNTY MISSISSIPPI AND TUNICA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. APPELLEES 011 Appeal from tile Circllit COllrt of TUl1ic(/

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No CA COA DELTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No CA COA DELTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER E-Filed Document Jul 8 2015 12:06:28 2014-CA-00240-COA Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FRANCES TUCKER APPELLANT VS. Cause No. 2014-CA-00240-COA DELTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. ) Civil No CIV. Defendants )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. ) Civil No CIV. Defendants ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and STACEY PICKERING in his capacity as Auditor for the State of Mississippi, Plaintiffs vs. THE LANGSTON

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a

More information

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL B. O'KEEFE, CELESTE A. FOSTER O'KEEFE, and THE DANCEL GROUP, INC. VS. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and MARSHALL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF: Th'"E STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. LAWRENCE BROWDER, APPELLEE CAUSE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF: Th'E STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. LAWRENCE BROWDER, APPELLEE CAUSE NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF: Th'"E STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Y-D LUMBER COMPANY, INC, APPELLANT VS. LAWRENCE BROWDER, APPELLEE -~. CAUSE NO. 2007-CA-01388 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 5 2017 13:43:04 2016-CP-01474-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LYNDON BRITAIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01474 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE MATTER OF: SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS CHAPTER 13 CASE NO. 10-10518-NPO LOCKE D. BARKLEY, Chapter 13 Trustee

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 11:54:28 2015-KA-00623-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA-00623 DENNIS THOMPSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF SIMPSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARILYN NEWSOME

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF SIMPSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARILYN NEWSOME E-Filed Document Oct 26 2015 16:36:29 2015-CA-00762 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF VICTORIA D. NEWSOME: MARILYN NEWSOME, APPELLANT CA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DA YID BRYANT, JR. V. PAMELA RENA SMITH BRYANT -e: APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CA-00669 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Mar 18 2016 11:38:59 2015-CA-01526 Pages: 20 MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2015-CA-01526 RICKEY W. THOMPSON APPELLANT VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 6 2014 13:34:19 2013-CA-01501 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE JONES VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT 2013-CA-01501 APPELLEE APPEALED FROM THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01079

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01079 E-Filed Document Oct 25 2016 15:38:12 2014-CA-01079-COA Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-01079 THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER APPELLANT VS. KIM HAMPTON, INDIVIDUALLY,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Dec 28 2015 17:29:25 2014-KA-00664-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES JOHNSON APPELLANT V. 2014-KA-00664-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2014 14:11:45 2013-CP-00467 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY YEARBY, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 27 2017 15:41:09 2016-CA-01033-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL ISHEE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CA-01033-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER E-Filed Document Nov 12 2015 22:59:01 2013-CA-02100-SCT Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-CA-02100-SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER APPELLANT VS. GAY ST. MARY WILLIAMS AND LARRY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOYT FORBES AND IDLDA FORBES V. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION APPELLANTS NO.2007-CA-00902-COA APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE E-Filed Document Oct 15 2014 23:49:51 2013-CA-00620-COA Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI VERA M. MILLER WOOD, et. al. APPELLANTS vs. SUPREME COURT: 2013-CA-00620 AUDREY H. KEMP, et. al. APPELLEES

More information

Case: 25CO1:16-cr Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

Case: 25CO1:16-cr Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Case: 25CO1:16-cr-00624 Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PLAINTIFF VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 16-624 ROBERT SHULER SMITH

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. E-Filed Document Jan 13 2016 21:53:42 2015-CA-00199-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PEARLIE WRIGHT APPELLANT v. NO. 2015-CA-00199-COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 24 2015 17:11:28 2015-CA-00413 Pages: 22 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TOMEKA HANDY, INDIVIDUALLY, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCENT BAILEY APPELLANT VS. NO. 2010-CP-0699 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :46: IA SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No M-219

E-Filed Document Oct :46: IA SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No M-219 E-Filed Document Oct 26 2017 15:46:15 2017-IA-00219-SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2017-M-219 INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 11 2017 16:34:51 2016-KA-01329-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GEROME MOORE APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01329-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2017 10:50:18 2016-CA-00444 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS-00444-SCT L. H. MANNING, VIRGINIA WARREN, JOHN HENRY MANNING, EVA MANNING, GEANNIE JONES, AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL E-Filed Document Aug 24 2015 15:39:23 2015-CA-00371 Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY PLAINTIFFS AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO M SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO M SCT E-Filed Document Aug 18 2016 10:43:12 2014-IA-00854-SCT Pages: 24 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-M-00854-SCT TRK, LLC D/B/A TIMBER RIDGE TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS, B&B MANAGEMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Sep 7 2017 10:15:38 2016-KA-00914-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHALONDA NIKKIA VALE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00914-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN OF WAYNE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN OF WAYNE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document May 11 2017 09:19:18 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.2016-CA-00928-COA CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. vs. VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLANT

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jun 24 2014 14:57:08 2013-CA-01002-COA Pages: 18 CASE NO. 2013-CA-01002 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC., BAPTIST MEMORIAL

More information

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION E-Filed Document Jan 24 201716:02:59 2015-CA-01428-COA Pages : 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELIZABETH GRAHAM and MATTHEW GRAHAM vs. JAMES R. "JAMIE" FRANKS, JR. and WHEELER AND FRANKS

More information

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

LegalFormsForTexas.Com Information or instructions: Motion & order to retain case on the docket 1. The following motion is required to prevent the case from being dismissed for lack of prosecution. Courts routinely dismiss cases

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. E-Filed Document Jan 12 2017 15:26:19 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2016-CA-01085 MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jan 3 2017 15:44:13 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC. APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 17:02:31 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NEDRA PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CA-00502 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAR OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAR OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BOBBY EARL WILSON, JR. VS. FILED MAR 1 9 2008 OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2007-CP-1541-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES ALBERT WIGGINS VS. BILLY RAY PERRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2006-CA-01126 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED LINDSEY C. MEADOR MEADOR & CRUMP P.O.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 12 2016 18:30:47 2014-CT-00260-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00260 DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. PAUL EDWARD NUNNERY, ET AL. PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Oct 20 2014 14:50:37 2014-CA-00381 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK W. DECKARD VS. LESA M. DECKARD APPELLANT CAUSE NO.

More information

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document May 11 2016 11:16:48 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN A/K/A BOOTY VS. APPELLANT NO. 2014-KA-00615-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AND IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AND IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AND IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, TEXAS EX P A R T E Texas Court of Criminal Appeals JOHN WI L L I A M K I N G, Cause No. WR-49,391-03

More information

NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SASS MUNI-V, LLC, MIC-ROCKY, LLC, et al.,

NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SASS MUNI-V, LLC, MIC-ROCKY, LLC, et al., E-Filed Document Sep 1 2014 21:09:59 2013-CA-01490 Pages: 20 NO. 2013-CA-01490 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SASS MUNI-V, LLC, Appellant, v. MIC-ROCKY, LLC, et al., Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM DESOTO

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO TS APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO TS APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ~PL\ lx" ~I[) WJ" I NO. 2009-TS-01267 DELIA SHEPARD, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY STOWERS, DECEASED APPELLANT VERSUS PRAIRIE ANESTHESIA

More information

Case 5:08-cv KS Document 95 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:08-cv KS Document 95 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 8 Case 5:08-cv-00275-KS Document 95 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION JEFFREY HAVARD VS. PETITIONER CIVIL ACTION NO.:

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 E-Filed Document May 23 2016 10:57:29 2015-CA-00903-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 MARKWETZEL APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD SEARS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 17 2015 16:00:09 2014-CC-01798 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-CC-01798 OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DERRICK POSS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1686-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 17 2015 16:55:41 2014-IA-00674-SCT Pages: 21 CASE NO. 2014-IA-00674-SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CALHOUN HEALTH SERVICES, APPELLANT v. MARTHA GLASPIE, APPELLEE

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 17:12:34 2014-CP-01810-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AKIVA KAREEM CLARK APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-01810-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00742

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00742 E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 15:21:03 2016-CA-00742-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00742 CYNDY HOWARTH, Individually, wife, wrongful death beneficiary, and as Executrix

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 16:09:56 2015-CP-00263-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00263-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 29 2018 15:36:58 2017-KA-01112-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY MARTIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-TS-01112 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANTS E-Filed Document May 31 2018 10:23:48 2016-CA-01057-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-01057 DAVID NEIL HARRIS, SR. AND VECIE MICHELE HARRIS APPELLANTS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 1 2018 15:21:48 2017-KA-01141-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRAYTONIA BADGER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-01141 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information