FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016"

Transcription

1 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: AMADO GONZALES and ANGELA GONZALES, -against- 3M CO., et. al. Plaintiffs, NYCAL Index No.: /2016 NOTICE OF CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE DEPOSITION OF PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP. UPON ORAL EXAMINATION Defendants. TO: ALL COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED DEFENDANTS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that pursuant to the New York Asbestos Litigation Case Management Order and Article 31 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, The Lanier Law Firm PLLC, will take the deposition of Philips Electronics North America Corp. s ( Philips ) 1 person most knowledgeable with respect to the following subject areas: 1. Philips knowledge of the hazards of asbestos including, without limitation, when and how Philips learned of said hazards. 2. The documents produced by Philips in this action. 3. The documents produced by Philips in Leidig v. 3M Co., Case No. BC , Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. 4. When Philips first learned of state and federal regulations relating to asbestos. 5. Philips corporate history including, without limitation, Magnavox. 1 Philips shall include Philips and/or its predecessors-in-interest including, without limitation, Magnavox. As such, each and every subject area and request in Schedule A pertains to Philips, Magnavox, and any other related entities to Philips and Magnavox. 1 of 10

2 6. All information, documents, and witnesses regarding any agreements or transactions between Philips and Magnavox. 7. All information, documents, and witnesses regarding any agreements or transactions between Philips and GTE Sylvania. 8. All information, documents, and witnesses regarding any agreements or transactions between Philips and Philco Corporation and/or Philco-Ford Corporation. 9. All information, documents, and witnesses regarding any agreements or transactions between Philips and Funai Corporation. 10. Philips document retention policy. 11. Philips membership in any industry associations. 12. Philips membership in any trade associations. 13. Asbestos-related workers compensation claims filed against Philips. 14. Claims made against Philips for injuries or death related to asbestos exposure from Philips television and/or radios. 15. Philips vacuum tube televisions including, without limitation, the first and last years of manufacture, appearance, and the percentage of televisions which contained asbestos component parts. 16. Philips vacuum tube radios including, without limitation, the first and last years of manufacture, appearance, and the percentage of radios which contained asbestos component parts. 17. The asbestos products used in conjunction with equipment manufactured by Philips, including, without limitation, asbestos cloth, padding, insulation, sound dampener, paper and sheet. 18. The miners, manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors of asbestos, asbestos products, or asbestos component parts, including fiber, incorporated into Philips vacuum tube televisions and radios. 19. Philips communication with any other defendants in this action. 20. Philips relationship with any other defendants in this action. 21. Philips sales practices in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. 22. The reasons why asbestos was used in Philips vacuum tube televisions and radios. 23. The company s financial condition (e.g., revenue, income, profit, etc.). 2 of 10

3 24. Insurance coverage for this lawsuit. 25. The company s ability to satisfy a verdict. 26. Communications with Johns-Manville concerning TV-Bord. 27. Philips use of TV-Bord in Philips vacuum tube televisions including, without limitation, the first and last year of use and appearance of said televisions. 28. The percentage of asbestos used in asbestos heat shields, cloth, sheet, paper, padding, insulation, and/or sound dampeners incorporated into Philips vacuum tube televisions and radios. 29. When Philips commenced use of asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers, and/or sound dampeners in its vacuum tube televisions and radios. 30. When Philips ceased use of asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers, and sound dampeners in its vacuum tube televisions and radios. 31. Whether Philips transistor/solid-state radios contained asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers and/or sound dampeners. 32. Whether Philips transistor/solid-state televisions contained asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers, and/or sound dampeners. 33. Whether Philips Hybrid televisions contained asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers, and/or sound dampeners. 34. To the extent applicable, why Philips chose not to use asbestos heat shields, padding, insulation, sheets, papers, and/or sound dampeners in its products described in subject area numbers 26 through 28 above. 35. Warnings, if any, placed on Philips televisions concerning the health hazards associated with asbestos. 36. Warnings, if any, placed on Philips radios concerning the health hazards associated with asbestos. 37. Warnings placed in any manuals, guides, or other written materials concerning the health hazards associated with asbestos as those materials related to televisions and/or radios. 38. Warnings concerning the creation of dust in connection with repairs or maintenance to Philips televisions and radios. 39. Knowledge of any non-asbestos heat dissipating and/or sound deadening insulation, padding, sheet, cloth, paper, shield or other material that is white in color and was used in Philips vacuum tube televisions and/or radios. 3 of 10

4 40. The differences, if any and if applicable, in the physical characteristics including, without limitation, the appearance of asbestos and non-asbestos, heat shields, sound deadeners, cloth, sheet, papers, insulation, and/or padding used in Philips vacuum tube televisions and/or radios. 41. Philips attempts to inform the public at large of asbestos in Philips vacuum tube television and radios. 42. The defendant s contentions, impressions and assessments as it relates to the testimony given in this case. 43. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that it performed each and every duty owed to Amado Gonzales in a reasonable manner. 44. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that it was not guilty of any negligence that was a proximate or producing cause of Amado Gonzales injuries and damages. 45. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that any of Amado Gonzales injuries and damages were the result of the negligence of third parties over whom the defendant exercised no direct or indirect control and over whom defendant had no supervisory responsibilities. 46. The identities of the third parties that defendant contends were negligent and resulted in Amado Gonzales injuries and damages over whom the defendant exercised no direct or indirect control and over whom defendant had no supervisory responsibilities. 47. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Amado Gonzales was guilty of negligence. 48. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Amado Gonzales had a duty to mitigate his injuries and failed to do so. 49. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Amado Gonzales injuries and damages are caused by the alteration, modification, or misuse of a product by Amado Gonzales over whom defendant exercised no control. 50. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Amado Gonzales injuries and damages are caused by the alteration, modification, or misuse of a product by third persons or parties over whom defendant exercised no control. 51. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that sometime prior to Amado Gonzales hands-on work with defendant s televisions and/or radios, an asbestos component part was installed which was not installed by Defendant. 52. All facts, documents, and witnesses that show defendant s televisions and/or radios were not sold with a white asbestos material located within to a first time purchaser. 4 of 10

5 53. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Plaintiff s injuries and damages were the result of the abnormal and unintended use of products, which was not reasonably foreseeable. 54. All facts, documents, and witnesses that support defendant s contention that Plaintiff s claims are barred in whole and/or in part by the Doctrine of Comparative Negligence. 55. The items listed in schedule A. 56. All other matters relevant to this action. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that the deposition(s) will commence on October 18, 2016 at 10:30 am EST, continuing day-to-day until completion, at the offices of The Lanier Law Firm, PLLC, 126 East 56th Street, New York, NY At such date and time, The Lanier Law Firm PLLC will conduct an examination and the testimony will be recorded stenographically and by videotape. This deposition will be held before an officer duly authorized to administer oaths at which time and place you are invited to attend and cross-examine. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that the person(s) to be examined is/are required to provide The Lanier Law Firm PLLC with any and all materials and data, including but not limited to documents, records, journals, brochures and pamphlets that, at any time, were reviewed, referenced and/or relied upon to formulate responses to the NYCAL standard interrogatories and requests for production and the production identification interrogatories and requests for production in this matter, and related attachments, which were submitted in this case, and all responses served by Defendant to the same submitted in this matter. Deponent is required to produce all documents contained within the attached Schedule A at least seven business days prior to the deposition and to bring all documents to said deposition. If the subject areas and items listed in Schedules A require the deposition of more than one witness for Philips, then Philips shall provide the names and titles to each of its persons most knowledgeable and shall afford plaintiffs the opportunity to depose said individuals at a date and 5 of 10

6 time mutually agreeable upon the parties. Dated: September 15, 2016 New York, New York THE LANIER LAW FIRM PLLC Attorney for Plaintiff(s) By: Joseph N. Cotilletta, Esq. 126 E. 56 th Street, 6 th Floor New York, New York Tel.: (212) of 10

7 SCHEDULE A 1. The witnesses most recent curriculum vitae or résumé. 2. Defendant s annual reports from 1940 through Defendant s organizational charts dated 1940 through the present. 4. All Defendant s catalogs dated 1920 through All documents evidencing Defendant s membership in any industry association between 1920 and All documents evidencing Defendant s membership in any trade association between 1920 and All records of sales to Amado Gonzales or any of his employers or worksites. 8. Photographs of each of the defendant s asbestos-containing vacuum tube televisions and radios manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, or supplied which match the plaintiffs witnesses descriptions of televisions and radios which Amado Gonzales worked on. 9. All documents in your possession relating in any way to meetings, correspondence, statements or other communications to or from any manufacturer or supplier (or from their agents, representatives or trade associations) of asbestos, asbestos-containing products and/or asbestos-containing materials concerning the health effects of asbestos. 10. All documents in your possession or of which you have ever become aware relating in any way to meetings, correspondence or other communications of any trade association, labor union, employer or governmental agency (or from any of their agents or representatives) relating to the subjects of occupational health and exposure to asbestos, asbestoscontaining products and/or asbestos-containing materials. 11. All documents prepared by or on behalf of the defendant, prior to this litigation, in any way relating to the documents requested in 9 and 10 above. 12. All documents in your possession relating in any way to the health effects of asbestos, asbestos dust, asbestos fibers, asbestos-containing products and/or asbestos-containing materials mined, processed, designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, transported or installed by any person or entity or by any of the named defendants herein. 7 of 10

8 13. All documents prepared, written, reviewed, issued or commented on by you or any of your agents or employees relating in any way to warnings, potential health hazards, instructions or precautions regarding the use, handling of, or exposure to asbestos, asbestos dust, asbestos fibers, asbestos-containing products and/or asbestos-containing materials. 14. All statements, recorded interviews, films, videotapes, reports, questionnaires, forms or other documents made, submitted, compiled, prepared or filled out by, on behalf of, or under the direction of defendant or any of its agents or employees relating in any way to exposure or alleged exposure to asbestos, asbestos-containing products and/or asbestoscontaining materials or any other issues relating to asbestos lawsuits, except that information which was prepared by, for, or at the request of defendant's counsel need not be produced (but must be identified, including date) without an order of the Court, provided that the written or recorded communication between defendant and counsel was made after an attorney-client relationship was established. 15. All documents relating to defendant's first knowledge, notice or awareness about the alleged adverse effects of exposure to asbestos, asbestos dust, asbestos fibers, asbestoscontaining products and/or asbestos-containing materials. 16. All records relating to comments, complaints, suggestions or proposals made by your agents, employees, officers, customers, dealers, distributors, contractors or yourself regarding the health effects of asbestos exposure. 17. All photographs of people working with, using or being exposed to any of the asbestoscontaining products you mined, processed, designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, transported or installed. 18. All documents submitted to any federal, state or local government or agency in connection with that body s efforts to establish standards, specifications or levels of ambient or occupational exposure to asbestos or asbestos dust from your products or your products replacement or component parts, whether or not manufactured by you. 19. All records relating to asbestos and/or asbestos-containing products of the type mined, processed, designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, transported or installed by defendant and which the defendant has in its possession, custody or control. 20. All labels, tags or warnings which defendant alleges it placed on the boxes, containers, wrappers or other materials which contained the asbestos-containing vacuum tube televisions and/or radios which defendant processed, designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, transported or installed. 8 of 10

9 21. Any customer, contractor, dealer or distributor complaint or report relating to any asbestoscontaining product that defendant mined, processed, designed, manufactured, marketed, distributed, sold, transported or installed and any incident or accident reports defendant produced or received relating to the health hazards of its asbestos-containing products. 22. All communications with or concerning the American Conference of Government and Industrial Hygienists. 23. All documents received by you or in your possession relating to or concerning the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (QAMA). 24. All documents marked as exhibits in any insurance coverage litigation between you and any liability insurance carrier, particularly those documents relating to disputes about insurance coverage for asbestos-related claims. 25. All documents produced by you in the course of any litigation with your liability insurance carrier regarding asbestos-related liabilities. 26. All documents reviewed by the witness to prepare for the deposition. 27. All documents concerning this defendant s historical knowledge of the dangers of asbestos or asbestos-containing products up to All documents in the defendant s possession relating to the need to protect its employees or contract workers from exposure to asbestos. 29. All documents in the defendant s possession relating to industrial hygiene studies relating to defendant s vacuum tube televisions and/or radios. 30. All documents in the defendant s possession relating to information provided to this Defendant from any insurance carrier related to the dangers of asbestos exposure. 31. All documents in the defendant s possession relating to workers compensation claims filed against this defendant alleging asbestos-related diseases. 32. All documents in the defendant s possession relating to respiratory protection provided to defendant s employees to prevent the inhalation of potentially harmful dusts. 33. Copies of all state regulations concerning asbestos that were in effect in those states where this defendant had manufacturing facilities up to of 10

10 34. All industrial hygiene manuals relating to the protection of employees or contract workers from asbestos fibers or asbestos-containing dust. 35. All documents relating to the membership of this defendant or its employees in any of the following organizations: a. The Air Hygiene Foundation b. The Industrial Hygiene Foundation c. American Industrial Hygiene Association d. The National Safety Council e. The American Petroleum Institute f. The Asbestos Information Association g. The Gypsum Association h. National Insulation Manufacturers Association i. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers j. Associated Radio Manufacturers k. Radio Manufacturers Association l. Radio Television Manufacturers Association m. Radio Electronics Television Manufacturers n. Electronics Industries Association o. Electronics Industries Alliance p. Consumer Electronics Association q. Consumer Technology Association 36. All documents concerning part numbers of defendant s vacuum tube televisions and/or radios associated with asbestos cloth, padding, insulation, sound deadeners, sheets and/or papers. 37. All documents concerning part numbers of defendant s vacuum tube televisions and/or radios associated with non-asbestos cloth, padding, insulation, sound deadeners, sheets and/or papers. 38. All documents defendant intends to use to contradict Amado Gonzales, Marie Gonzales and/or Joseph Gonzales testimony in this case including, without limitation, those deponent s testimony regarding the physical characteristics and/or appearance of defendant s vacuum tube televisions and/or radios. 39. All documents evidencing any mergers, acquisitions, and/or asset purchase agreements between: (a) Philips; and (b) Magnavox; and/or (c) GTE Sylvania; and/or (d) Funai Corpration. 10 of 10

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/2016 05:12 PM INDEX NO. 190113/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

Master File No ORDER NO. 9 Plaintiffs' Master Set of Requests for Production to Defendants

Master File No ORDER NO. 9 Plaintiffs' Master Set of Requests for Production to Defendants Master File No. 2004-70000 In Re: TEXAS STATE SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to All Cases IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 295 JUDICIAL DISTRICT (Judge Tracy Christopher

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/2016 08:18 PM INDEX NO. 151068/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 01:23 PM INDEX NO. 190245/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2017 1200 AM INDEX NO. 656279/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/01/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF [Insert County] [Insert Caption] vs. Plaintiff Defendant To: Defendant [Insert Name] Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] Hon. [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 190293/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X VINCENT ASCIONE, v. ALCOA,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2016 02:54 PM INDEX NO. 190047/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X NORMAN DOIRON AND ELAINE

More information

FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/27/ :50 AM

FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/27/ :50 AM MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE THIS IS NOT A BILL. THIS IS YOUR RECEIPT. Receipt # Book Page Return To: No. Pages: 19 JOSEPH THOMAS KREMER I istmment: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT Control #: Unrecorded #7461348

More information

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT A. PARTIES FILE RESPONSES TO AMICI BRIEFS IN CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT COMPONENT PARTS DISPUTE O Neil, et al., v. Crane Co., et al.,, No. S177401, petition filed (Calif. Sup. Ct. Sept. 18, 2009) In a dispute

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/2016 03:59 PM INDEX NO. 25545/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX ------------------------------------------------------x

More information

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered

More information

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/2017 06:40 PM INDEX NO. 190088/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

A Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product?

A Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product? Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product?

More information

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 121 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 121 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 13 (Mendez, M.) MARIO PICCOLINO and ARCANGELA Index No. 190186/2016 PICCOLINO, Plaintiffs,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 03:49 PM INDEX NO. 190202/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ /30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ /30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 12:42 PM INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

Rau v Aerco Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 32368(U) September 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein

Rau v Aerco Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 32368(U) September 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Rau v Aerco Intl., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 32368(U) September 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190414/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

C170 Chemicals Convention, 1990

C170 Chemicals Convention, 1990 Page 1 of 11 C170 Chemicals Convention, 1990 Convention concerning Safety in the use of Chemicals at Work (Note: Date of coming into force: 04:11:1993.) Convention:C170 Place:Geneva Session of the Conference:77

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/2015 01:47 PM INDEX NO. 190350/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2015 04:18 PM INDEX NO. 154070/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x

More information

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2016 02:19 PM INDEX NO. 32209/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2016 SUPREME COURT: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX X Index No: Federal National Mortgage

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 0433 PM INDEX NO. 190115/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/07/2016 LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 (212) 302-2400

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO. 160641/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :57 PM

FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :57 PM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In Re Seventh Judicial District Asbestos Litigation This Document Applies to: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF MONROE JENNIFER

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X X Index 0 655065/2017 SCOTT KRAUSE,. DEFENDANT'S FIRST Plaintiff,. NOTICE FOR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-btm-bgs Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 GAIL ELIZABETH WALASHEK, Individually and as successor-ininterest to THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL --------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :51 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :51 PM Exhibit G FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/2016 02/07/2017 04:42 02:51 PM INDEX NO. 156798/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2016 02/07/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY

More information

Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /04 Judge: Sherry Klein

Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /04 Judge: Sherry Klein Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 110194/04 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's

More information

Case 2:13-cv DDP-VBK Document 864 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:36038 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:13-cv DDP-VBK Document 864 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:36038 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ddp-vbk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 VICTORIA LUND, individually and as successor-in-interest to WILLIAM LUND, deceased;

More information

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 03:08 PM INDEX NO. 25877/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX CARL BAILEY, Plaintiff, Index No.:

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS

United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS 1 PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO ROBERT P. TAYLOR 2 225 Bush Street Mailing Address P. 0. Box 7880 3 San Francisco, CA 94120 Telephone: (415 983-1000 4 NEUMAN, WILLIAMS, ANDERSON & OLSON 5 THEODORE W. ANDERSON

More information

Consumer Strength Equipment

Consumer Strength Equipment Consumer Strength Equipment Limited Warranty For Precor consumer strength equipment manufactured after the effective date of this limited warranty. PLEASE READ THESE WARRANTY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY

More information

Moore v Asbeka Indus. of N.Y NY Slip Op 33522(U) December 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Sherry Klein

Moore v Asbeka Indus. of N.Y NY Slip Op 33522(U) December 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Sherry Klein Moore v Asbeka Indus. of N.Y. 2010 NY Slip Op 33522(U) December 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190144/09 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/30/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/30/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/30/2016 03:47 PM INDEX NO. 190113/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/2016 04:21 PM INDEX NO. 190383/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AVON PRODUCTS, INC., CLEVELAND NA INVESTOR LLC

More information

BANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION

BANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION CLM 2016 SOUTHWEST CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 3-4, 2016 IN DALLAS, TEXAS BANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION I. Historical Perspective. A. Johns-Manville, Bankruptcies, and Garlock. In 1982 the Reagan

More information

Case 2:13-cv DDP-VBK Document 875 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:36997

Case 2:13-cv DDP-VBK Document 875 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:36997 Case :-cv-0-ddp-vbk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 VICTORIA LUND, individually and as successor-in-interest to WILLIAM LUND, deceased;

More information

Hammer v Algoma 2013 NY Slip Op 31801(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from

Hammer v Algoma 2013 NY Slip Op 31801(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from Hammer v Algoma 2013 NY Slip Op 31801(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 190363/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :24 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :24 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2015 04:24 PM INDEX NO. 190079/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES, FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/2016 11:03 PM INDEX NO. 190300/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/2016 12:53 PM INDEX NO. 190187/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ANGELO C. ABRUZZINO and BARBARA

More information

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES CAUSE NO. ' IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, ' ' V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT ' ' Defendant. ' OF COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT S INTERROGATORIES TO PLANTIFF TO: PLAINTIFF,, by service

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO. 107442/2010... NYSCEF DON 61712010 DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2010 -against- Plaintiff@), LIFE FTTNESS, A DIVISION OF BRUNSWICK CORPORATION and

More information

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/2017 12:02 PM INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002373 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA FRANK JAKUBOWKI AND GLORIA

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/2014 10:18 AM INDEX. 190017/2013 NYSCEF DOC.. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOIU< COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------J{

More information

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANT FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S OMNIBUS MOTION

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANT FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S OMNIBUS MOTION SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO GASPAR HERNANDEZ-VEGA Plaintiff, -against- AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al.,

More information

Case No. 11-cv CRB ORDER DENYING FOSTER WHEELER S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs,

Case No. 11-cv CRB ORDER DENYING FOSTER WHEELER S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs, Case :-cv-0-crb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 GERALDINE HILT, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-in-Interest to ROBERT

More information

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant. F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Interrogatories from Plaintiff to Defendant 1. Please

More information

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS I. GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep

More information

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 156 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 156 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND.. ------------X JANE DOE, an infant by her mother and guardian, TARA NALLY and TARA NALLY, COMBINED DEMANDS Individually, Index No.: 150733/2016

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/ :04 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/ :04 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/2015 11:04 AM INDEX NO. 190275/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Notice Of Interrogatories

Notice Of Interrogatories Home Slip and Fall - Pleadings Main Index - Interrogatories Notice Of Interrogatories IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 13-01xxxx B.O.G. Plaintiff,

More information

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under amended Supreme Court Rule 213(j) (eff. January 1, 1996), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories

More information

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regulate civil discovery procedures in the state. Florida does not require supplementary responses to

More information

INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. 1. State your full name, your present address, and date of birth.

INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. 1. State your full name, your present address, and date of birth. INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT 1. State your full name, your present address, and date of birth. 2. If the complaint filed herein arose out of a motor vehicle incident (incident is defined as the accident

More information

40 Paterson Street New Brunswick, NJ Tel: (732) Fax: (732) November 12, 2015

40 Paterson Street New Brunswick, NJ Tel: (732) Fax: (732) November 12, 2015 40 Paterson Street New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Tel: (732) 545-4717 Fax: (732) 545-4579 www.hoaglandlongo.com Daniel R: KuszmefrsRI Associate dkuszmerski@hoaglandlongo.com ATIOIIIEYI at law November 12, 2015

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI) PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 15-1988 IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI) Steven Frankenberger, Special Administrator for the Estate of Howard

More information

60-DAY NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE (d)

60-DAY NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE (d) 60-DAY NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 25249. 7(d) DATE: June 14,2013 T 0: FROM: Abad Chavez, President - A bad Foam, Inc. Salvadore Gonzales, President- Pomona

More information

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy Information & Instructions: Master Interrogatories 1. The interrogatories in this form are designed for selection to fit the case. 2. The questions are intended to show the range of questions that may

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO Assunte Catazano a/k/a Sue Catazano, as Personal INDEX NO. 190298-16 Representative

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/2015 03:53 PM INDEX NO. 158764/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/09/2015 Exhibit B to the Affirmation of Howard I. Elman, Esq. in Support of Defendants Motion

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/01/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/01/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/01/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/01/2017 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/01/2017 0452 PM INDEX NO. 190138/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/01/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In Re NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/10/2013 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 265 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/10/2013. Exhibit 2

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/10/2013 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 265 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/10/2013. Exhibit 2 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/10/2013 INDEX NO. 650587/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 265 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/10/2013 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Chapter 1. TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND SAFETY ACT (Assented to March 6, 2002)

Chapter 1. TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND SAFETY ACT (Assented to March 6, 2002) Chapter 1 TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND SAFETY ACT (Assented to March 6, 2002) Purpose 1. The purpose of this Act is to enhance public safety in Nunavut by providing for the efficient and flexible administration

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/29/ :53 AM INDEX NO /2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/29/ :53 AM INDEX NO /2017 INDEX NO. 805075/2017 FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02:38 PM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X X MARIA

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 152438/2017 JANE DOE #3, JANE DOE #4, JANE DOE #5, and JANE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 7/8/14 Modified and Certified for Publication 7/21/14 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ROSE MARIE GANOE et al., Plaintiffs

More information

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 2014 CA 2505 ON JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Plaintiff, vs. PUNITIVE DAMAGES PERSONAL INJURY HERITAGE PARTNERS

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/02/ :23 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/02/ :23 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2016 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/02/2016 11:23 AM INDEX NO. 505521/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2016 JFC/dra/168105 TA-2015-06-17-0003-001 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF

More information

DIVISION 2 DIVISION OF FINANCE - DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

DIVISION 2 DIVISION OF FINANCE - DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DIVISION 2 DIVISION OF FINANCE - DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Chapter 10. Records Management Committee. 11. Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (Surplus Property). (No rules filed.) 12. Acceptance

More information

ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES. December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018

ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES. December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018 ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES COURT REPORTERS December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018 BEST PRACTICES FOR EXHIBIT HANDLING FOR DEPOSITIONS Following is Best Practices for Exhibit Handling for Depositions

More information

SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the

SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the Circuit Court. It has been compiled through the cooperation of the Judges of

More information

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS UNITED CORPORATION, ) vs. WAHEED HAMED, DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN ) Case No. ST -13 -CV -102 ) PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF Plaintiff, ) INTERROGATORIES TO

More information

NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION 79 TH Annual Convention & Exhibits

NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION 79 TH Annual Convention & Exhibits NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION 79 TH Annual Convention & Exhibits Complex Product Liability: The Plaintiff s Perspective of Evaluating and Preparing a Winning Case. LaBarron Boone Kendall C. Dunson Rodney Barganier

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/03/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 379 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/03/2014. Exhibit C

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/03/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 379 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/03/2014. Exhibit C FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/03/2014 01:44 PM INDEX NO. 650587/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 379 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/03/2014 Exhibit C McKinney's CPLR Rule 3113 Page 1 Effective: September 23, 2014 McKinney's

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,, et al. Plaintiff Defendants Case No. NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER 1 The Pretrial Conference in the above captioned matter

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO. 500743/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS BERGMANN DHAITI and NOYESSE DHAITI, -against-

More information

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/2016 01:45 PM INDEX NO. 607940/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 1 of 20 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROXANNE CHRISTIAN and

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/21/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2015

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/21/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2015 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/21/2015 05:39 PM INDEX NO. 27008/2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX EMMA VAIRO, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS INJURED PERSON, Plaintiff, v. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES Defendants. COMPLAINT AT LAW NOW COMES the plaintiff, INJURED PERSON, by and

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO. 654351/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 C:\Documents and Settings\Delia\My Documents\Pleadings\Steiner Studios adv. NY Studios and Eponymous

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO. 151360/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK STEPHEN MOLINARI, Index No.: 151360/12

More information

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. Sale And License STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1.1 Controlling Conditions of Sale. All purchases and sales of Products, including all parts, kits for assembly, spare parts and components thereof

More information

Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 32705(U) October 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:

Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 32705(U) October 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2014 NY Slip Op 32705(U) October 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190278/13 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2017 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2017 05:45 PM INDEX NO. 162158/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _«_ «._..._.._.._... «...,,»

More information

Florida House of Representatives HB 889 By Representative Melvin

Florida House of Representatives HB 889 By Representative Melvin By Representative Melvin 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to vessels; creating s. 3 327.901, F.S.; creating the "Vessel Warranty 4 Enforcement Act," also known as the "Vessel 5 Lemon Law"; creating

More information

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 2 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

More information

Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Legal Considerations During Investigation 12/20/2013. Legal Considerations

Knowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Legal Considerations During Investigation 12/20/2013. Legal Considerations Legal Considerations Knowledge Objectives (1 of 2) Recognize and list the major legal issues and considerations that may arise in a fire or explosion investigation. Describe the legal authority for both

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x LEROY BAKER, Index No.: 190058/2017 Plaintiff, -against- AF SUPPLY USA INC.,

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :43 PM

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :43 PM FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/2015 12:43 PM INDEX NO. 24282/2013E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 37 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -X CARL MILES, Index No.: 24282/2013E

More information