Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON
|
|
- Darren Miles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON Defendant. Civil No GFVT ORDER *** *** *** *** This matter is before e Court on Defendant Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer. [R. 8.] In seeking dismissal, argues at e Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear is action for declaratory judgment and venue is improper. [Id.] Alternatively, he seeks a transfer to e United States District Court for e Middle District of Tennessee, which he claims is a more convenient forum. [Id.] Alough e Court finds at subject matter jurisdiction exists, it declines to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201(a. Therefore, is action will be dismissed wiout prejudice. This case arises out of a plan by I. or hospital to recruit plastic surgeons to its facility in Somerset, Kentucky. [Plaintiff s Response, R. 15 at 3.] To assist in ese efforts, arent corporation, engaged Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 1 of 11
2 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 2 of 11 LLC ( in June of 2008 to find candidates for e hospital. [Defendant s Motion to Dismiss, R. 8, Attach 2 at 2; Affidavit of mon, Seaboard s chief operating officer, R. 8, Attach. 4.] That same identified Defendant as a possible recruit and presented his curriculum vitae to Affidavit at 6.] At e time, was sixty-two years old, lived in New York and practiced medicine in Massachusetts. [See Affidavit of R. 8, Attach 2.] Lake Cumberland s chief executive officer, expressed interest in hiring and invited him to e facility. [Herrington Affidavit at 6a, 7.] visited e hospital over two days in August and met wi he hospital s director of physician relations, and oer physicians. [Id.] By September, it seemed as ough would formally make Haidek and offer. [Id. at 8.] According to however, informed him in early October at some at e facility and were worried about age. [Id. at 10.] assured at he intended to continue his practice for several more years, and e hospital sent him a written contract to review. [Id. at 10-11; Plaintiff s Response to Defendant s Motion to Dismiss, R. 15 at 4.] however, ultimately widrew e contract and decided to hire anoer, younger physician living and practicing in Kentucky. Affidavit at 14-15; Plaintiff s Response at 4.] Upon learning is news, says he informed and at is decision would expose e hospital to age discrimination litigation and ceased referring candidates to and e hospital. [ Affidavit at 16, 18.] filed a charge of discrimination wi e Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in January 2009, alleging at widrew its offer on account of his age. [Charge of Discrimination, R. 18, Attach 2.] In February, attorney, Joshua Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 2 of 11
3 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 3 of 11 Friedman, sent a letter to chief legal officer, requesting mediation or settlement of his client s claims. [Affidavit of Joshua Freidman, R. 8, Attach. 6.] Alough never responded, Friedman subsequently received a call from who said he was former partner and indicated at wanted to discuss resolving is matter. [Id.] requested a written settlement demand, which Friedman transmitted on behalf on April 20, By reply at mon, advised at it would take irty days or so to provide a response. [Id.] On May 28, Friedman ed seeking an update. [Id.] dvised at he had researched e matter and needed to consult his client. [Id.] When Friedman had not heard from by June 8, he sent anoer to stating at he had drafted a complaint and inquired wheer he needed to file it. [Id.] Peters responded e same day, anking him for his patience and saying at he would let him know one way or e oer by Friday, June 12. [Id.] When at day arrived, called Friedman and informed him at filed e instant action for declaratory judgment in e Eastern District of Kentucky. [Id.] More specifically, Complaint for Declaratory Judgment seeks a declaration at e contemplated relationship between e Hospital and pursuant to e recruiting agreement was one of independent contractor and not employer/employee. Complaint, R. 1 at 12.] Accordingly, claims at if was never an applicant for employment en he would not be entitled to any relief under e Age Discrimination in Employment Act ( ADEA, 29 U.S.C. 621, et seq., or e Kentucky Civil Rights Act ( KCRA, Ken. Rev. Stat , et seq. [Id. at 15.] On June 18, 2009, filed a complaint against and in e Middle District of Tennessee on e grounds at eir actions violated ADEA and KCRA. Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 3 of 11
4 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 4 of 11 Complaint, R. 8, Attach 5.] Shortly ereafter, filed e instant motion to dismiss and/or transfer is case. II. A. In his motion to dismiss, first challenges e jurisdiction of is Court. Alough originally invoked is Court s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332, it now agrees at complete diversity of citizenship is lacking. [Plaintiff s Response, R. 15 at 2.] For purposes of diversity jurisdiction It argued complete diversity existed because it believed 1 is a citizen of Delaware and Tennessee. was a resident of eier New York or Massachusetts when it brought is action. [Plaintiff s Complaint, R. 1 at 2.] states at alough he lived in New York and practiced medicine in Massachusetts when first recruited him, he is a citizen of Tennessee now because he relocated to Tullahoma, Tennessee in April of 2009 and continues to reside ere. Affidavit at 5-6.] oes not challenge ese assertions and concedes at since moved prior to it filing is action, e parties are not diverse. [Plaintiff s Response at 2.] Nevereless, question jurisdiction exists because now argues at, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, federal subsequently-filed suit in e U.S. District Court for e Middle District of Tennessee seeks relief for a violation of federal law, e ADEA. In 1 Since is a limited liability company, it has e citizenship of all of its members. See Homfeld II, LLC v. Comair Holdings, Inc., 53 F. App x 731, 732 (6 Cir is e sole member of [R. 1 at 1.] Unlike a LLC, a corporation is a citizen of e state under whose laws it is organized and e state where its principal place of business is located. 28 U.S.C. 1332(c(1. is organized under e laws of Delaware and has its principal place of business in Nashville, Tennessee. [R. 1 at 1.] Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 4 of 11
5 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 5 of 11 response, invokes e well-pleaded complaint rule, arguing at has failed to properly allege federal question jurisdiction in its complaint for declaratory judgment and has not sought leave to amend its complaint. argument misses e mark. Ordinarily, to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a federal question must appear on e face of e plaintiff s complaint, and not in anticipation of a defense based on federal law. Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908. However, e rule is different when a declaratory judgment plaintiff brings an action under 28 U.S.C at asserts a defense to an impending claim. In such situations, federal question jurisdiction will be found when e declaratory judgment defendant s reatened coercive action would present a federal question. See Skelly Oil v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667 (1950; Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 (1983; AmSou Bank v. Dale, 386 F.3d 763 (6 Cir Thus, it is e character of e reatened action, and not e defense, which will determine wheer ere is federal-question jurisdiction in e District Court. AmSou, 386 F.3d at 775 (quoting Pub. Serv. Comm n v. Wycoff Co., 344 U.S. 237, 248 (1952. By its very nature, en, is inquiry is not confined to e allegations contained in e initial pleading seeking declaratory relief. 2 That Haidek s reatened action presents a federal question and ereby confers subject matter jurisdiction over is case is beyond doubt. Haidek believed at Lake Cumberland had discriminated against him because of his age when it rescinded its recruitment offer. Among oer ings, e federal ADEA prohibits an employer from refusing to hire an individual because 2 Moreover, e Court does not agree at a federal issue is absent from e face of complaint for declaratory relief. Alough e complaint does not allege federal question jurisdiction as e basis for is Court s subject matter jurisdiction, it specifically sought a declaration at was not entitled to any relief under e federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act. [R. 1 at 15.] Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 5 of 11
6 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 6 of 11 of his age, and expressly auorizes private causes of action provided certain administrative steps are first taken. 29 U.S.C. 623, 626. In January 2009, took e first step towards bringing an action when he filed a charge of discrimination against Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Moreover, i e was apparently aware at was contemplating a claim under e ADEA because its declaratory complaint expressly requests a determination at was not entitled to any relief under e ADEA. Eventually, action before e federal court in Tennessee would be predicated on e ADEA, and us a federal question. Accordingly, e Court finds at it has jurisdiction over complaint despite e fact at it failed to allege e presence of a federal question in its initial pleading. B. Having found at subject matter jurisdiction exists, e Court now must determine wheer it should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under e Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201(a. See Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Co., 316 U.S. 491, 494 (1942 (exercise of jurisdiction under e Declaratory Judgment Act is not mandatory; see also Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. J & L Lumber Co., Inc., 373 F.3d 807, 812 (6 Cir [D]istrict courts possess discretion in determining wheer and when to entertain an action under e Declaratory Judgment Act, even when e suit oerwise satisfies subject matter jurisdictional prerequisites. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co., 515 U.S. 277, 282 (1995. In oer words, alough e District Court has jurisdiction of e suit brought under e Declaratory Judgment Act, it [i]s under no compulsion to exercise at discretion. Brillhart, 316 U.S. at 494. Moreover, a district court does not need to point to exceptional circumstances in declining to exercise jurisdiction in a Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 6 of 11
7 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 7 of 11 declaratory judgment suit. See Wilton, 515 U.S. at 286. Therefore, because eeks a declaratory judgment, is Court, in its discretion, must determine wheer is case is appropriate for such relief. In making is assessment, e Court should determine wheer e judgment will serve a useful purpose in clarifying and settling e legal relationships in issue and wheer it will terminate and afford relief from e uncertainty, insecurity, and controversy giving rise to e proceeding. Broerhood Mut. Ins. Co. v. United Apostolic Lighouse, Inc., 200 F. Supp. 2d 689, 692 (E.D. Ky (citations omitted. A full inquiry into all relevant considerations must be made, taking into account e following five factors: (1 wheer e declaratory action would settle e controversy; (2 wheer e declaratory action would serve a useful purpose in clarifying e legal relations in issue; (3 wheer e declaratory remedy is being used merely for e purpose of procedural fencing or to provide an arena for a race for res judicata; (4 wheer e use of a declaratory action would increase e friction between our federal and state courts and improperly encroach on state jurisdiction; and (5 wheer ere is an alternative remedy which is better or more effective. See Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Roumph, 211 F.3d 964, 968 (6 Cir (citations omitted. Here, ese factors do not weigh in favor of exercising discretional jurisdiction to resolve e controversy. Wi regard to e first factor, a declaration about wheer e contemplated relationship between e parties was at of an independent contractor or employer-employee would not necessarily settle e matter. If e Court were to determine at e recruiting agreement would have established an employment relationship between and en e broader issues of wheer e hospital violated federal and state age discrimination laws by widrawing e proposed contract and giving it to anoer physician would remain for e federal court in Tennessee to resolve. Accordingly is factor weighs against discretionary jurisdiction. Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 7 of 11
8 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 8 of 11 The Court also believes e second factor - wheer e declaratory judgment would serve a useful purpose in clarifying e legal relations at issue - weighs against hearing is case. The Six Circuit has noted at ere is little utility in a declaratory action at is brought for a determination of liability on an already-accrued damages claim when a suit for relief on e underlying coercive claim is also pending. See AmSou Bank v. Dale, 386 F.3d 763, (6 Cir This is e situation here since e injuries alleged by are dependent on historical occurrences raer an ongoing conditions. See id. at Moreover, e Six Circuit was emphatic at where resolution of a pending coercive suit would address e issues raised in e declaratory action, e second factor weighs heavily in favor of dismissing e declaratory judgment suit. Id. at 786. As e AmSou court noted, Where a pending action, filed by e natural plaintiff, would encompass all e issues in e declaratory judgment action, e policy reasons underlying e creation of e extraordinary remedy of declaratory judgment are not present, and e use of at remedy is unjustified. AmSou, 386 F.3d at 787. In is case, defense at it contemplated a independent contractor, and not a employer-employee, relationship would need to be resolved by e federal court in Tennessee, if e hospital chooses to raise it. Under e ird factor, is case presents e appearance of procedural fencing or a race for res judicata, which weighs in favor of dismissal. Instead of filing suit immediately, contacted in an attempt to enter good fai settlement negotiations. It complied wi request for a written settlement demand and acceded to its request at it be given irty days or so to look into e matter. When at time was up, e hospital indicated it would need more time to make a decision. About ten days later, on June 8, informed e hospital at he had drafted a complaint and was ready to file and wanted to Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 8 of 11
9 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 9 of 11 know wheer he would need to do so. again demurred, saying at it should have someing substantive [ ] one way or e oer by e end of e week. When e week s end arrived, counsel for advised apparently out of e blue, at e instant declaratory action had been filed. rejects e implication at it sandbagged does not contest ese facts but [Plaintiff s Response at 11.] Instead, it states at is declaratory action was necessary because it was oerwise presented wi a Hobson s choice - eier settle Haidek s claims or face e possibility of having to defend itself in New York or Massachusetts or Tennessee or whatever oer jurisdiction Defendant chose. [Id.] Wheer or not is can be called sandbagging, such stalling by a declaratory plaintiff so at it might be able to file first and get its choice of venue is precisely what e ird factor aims to discourage. Again, e Six Circuit s opinion in AmSou is instructive. Faced wi similar dilatory tactics by e declaratory plaintiff, e Six Circuit held at such maneuvering weighs heavily against e exercise of jurisdiction. See AmSou, 386 F.3d at It stated, Courts take a dim view of declaratory plaintiffs who file eir suits mere days or weeks before e coercive suits filed by a natural plaintiff and who seem to have done so for e purpose of acquiring a favorable forum. Allowing declaratory actions in ese situations can deter settlement negotiations and encourage races to e courouse, as potential plaintiffs must file before approaching defendants for settlement negotiations, under pain of declaratory suit. This also dovetails wi [e second factor]: where a putative defendant files a declaratory action whose only purpose is to defeat liability in a subsequent coercive suit, no real value is served by e declaratory judgment except to guarantee to e declaratory plaintiff her choice of forum - a guarantee at cannot be given consonant wi e policy underlying e Declaratory Judgment Act. Id. at 788. The court furer invoked case law from oer jurisdictions finding at allowing declaratory actions to continue under ese circumstances would lead to needless litigation occasioning waste of judicial resources, delay in resolution of controversies and misuse of Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 9 of 11
10 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 10 of 11 judicial process to harass an opponent in litigation. Id. (citing BASF Corp. v. Symington, 50 F.3d 555, (8 Cir The four factor requires a determination of wheer e use of a declaratory action would increase friction between federal and state courts. Courts usually consult several factors in 3 making is determination. However, since ere is no parallel state court proceeding between e parties, ere is little risk of friction between federal and state courts in is case. Moreover, because underlying coercive action is predicated on bo state and federal causes of action ere is no reason to believe at a state court would be in a better position to evaluate factual issues in is case. Accordingly, is factor weighs in favor of exercising jurisdiction. Finally, under e fif factor, e Court must determine wheer ere is an alternative remedy which is better or more effective. In evaluating is factor, e Six Circuit in AmSou noted at [t]he existence of a coercive action is important to our determination at is declaratory action would serve no useful purpose. Id. at 791. Alough it cited case law from district courts in Michigan finding at a pending coercive action helps to sharpen and refine issues to be decided, see id. (citing Albie s Food, Inc. v. Menusaver, Inc., 170 F.Supp.2d 736, 740 (E.D. Mich. 2001; Pakideh v. Ahadi, 99 F.Supp.2d 805, (E.D. Mich. 2000, it ultimately was unsure at is factor weighs heavily in favor of or against entertaining ese declaratory actions. AmSou, 386 F.3d at 788. For many of e reasons already stated, e Court believes at is factor tends to weigh against exercising discretion in e present case, albeit only moderately so. 3 Courts consider (1 wheer e underlying factual issues are important to an informed resolution of e case; (2 wheer e state trial court is in a better position to evaluate ose factual issues an is e federal court; and (3 wheer ere is a close nexus between e underlying factual and legal issues and state law and/or public policy, or wheer federal common or statutory law dictates a resolution of e declaratory judgment action. Scottsdale, 211 F.3d at 968. Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 10 of 11
11 Case 6:09-cv GFVT Document 19 Filed 03/17/10 Page 11 of 11 In sum, en, ere are four factors at weigh in favor of dismissing is case, two of which weighing heavily so, and one factor at weighs in favor of exercising jurisdiction. On balance, erefore, e clear weight of ese factors falls against exercising jurisdiction, and e Court will decline to do so. As a result, e Court need not reach e arguments concerning venue. as follows: III. Accordingly, and e Court being duly and sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED 1. The Defendant s Motion to Dismiss [R. 8] is GRANTED and alternative Motion to Transfer [R. 8] is DENIED; 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and STRICKEN from e Court s active docket; and This e 17 day of March, Case 3:09-cv Document 36-1 Filed 03/18/2010 Page 11 of 11
Case: 3:14-cv slc Document #: 77 Filed: 04/27/15 Page 1 of 8
Case: 3:14-cv-00734-slc Document #: 77 Filed: 04/27/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WOODMAN S FOOD MARKET, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE CLOROX COMPANY
More informationCase 9:14-cv KAM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:14-cv-81184-KAM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-81184-CIV-MARRA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
More informationCase 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 29 Filed 02/18/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case :0-cv-0-VAP-JCR Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 LESTER J. MARSTON - California State Bar No. 000 E-mail: marston@pacbell.net RAPPORT AND MARSTON 0 West Perkins Street P.O. Box Ukiah, CA Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-00-rmp Document Filed 0// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, WORKLAND & WITHERSPOON, PLLC, a limited liability company; and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2689-N ORDER
Case 3:14-cv-02689-N Document 15 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 141 149 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationA PLAINTIFF S GUIDE TO CIVIL IMMUNITY
A PLAINTIFF S GUIDE TO CIVIL IMMUNITY Mike Comer Patterson Comer Law Firm 0 Main Ave., Ste. A Norport, AL 5476 (05) 759-99 Ph. (05) 759-99 Fax Immunity from e civil liability at ordinarily attaches to
More informationTWENTIETH ANNUAL SOUTHERN SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS
TWENTIETH ANNUAL SOUTHERN SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS CONFERENCE Clearwater, Florida st APRIL 30 & MAY 1, 2009 ARBITRATION AND THE MILLER ACT SURETY PRESENTED BY: DAVID J. KREBS, ESQ. MARC L. DOMRES, ESQ.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROBERTS IRRIGATION COMPANY, INC., v. HORTAU CORP. and HORTAU, INC., Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER 16-cv-0028-slc Defendants. Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Lane, et al v. Capital Acquisitions, et al Doc. 217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 04-60602-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON RICHARD LANE and FAITH LANE, v. Plaintiffs, CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS
More informationUnited States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00363-MHS-DDB Document 16 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 441 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION RA INVESTMENT I, LLC, ET AL. vs. Case No. 4:05CV363
More informationCase 1:08-cv SJM Document 26 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:08-cv-00323-SJM Document 26 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS; ALLEGHENY DEFENSE
More informationWILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Case: 19-1268 Document: 14 Filed: 03/21/2019 Page: 1 WILLIAM J. OLSON (VA, D.C.) HERBERT W. TITUS (VA OF COUNSEL) JEREMIAH L. MORGAN (D.C., CA ONLY) ROBERT J. OLSON (VA, D.C.) WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS
More informationCase: Document: Filed: 08/26/2010 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0548n.06. No.
Case: 09-5705 Document: 006110716860 Filed: 08/26/2010 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0548n.06 No. 09-5705 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ASSURANCE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 4:18-cv-00203-CDP Doc. #: 48 Filed: 08/28/18 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 788 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
McPhail v. LYFT, INC. Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JENNIFER MCPHAIL A-14-CA-829-LY LYFT, INC. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR. Case No. 00 DR XXX N T. J. F., Respondent,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION K. A. F., Petitioner, vs. Case No. 00 DR XXX N T. J. F., Respondent, ORDER ON WIFE S MOTION TO COMPEL
More informationCase 0:06-cv KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-60557-KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 06-60557-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON LIZ ORDONEZ-DAWES, v. Plaintiff,
More informationNEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY
Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY Present: HONORABLE KEVIN J. KERRIGAN Part 10 Juice ----------------------------------------X MATTHEW SAFOS, M.D.M.Z. CORP., and Index 150 LIGHTHOUSE
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL30095 CRS Report for Congress Received rough e CRS Web Committee Funding Resolutions and Processes, 106 Congress Updated March 25, 1999 Paul S. Rundquist Specialist in American National Government
More informationCase 2:04-cv LRS Document 357 Filed 06/19/2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :0-cv-00-LRS Document Filed 0//00 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 JOSEPH A. PAKOOTAS, an individual and enrolled member of e Confederated Tribes of e Colville Reservation;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
1 1 1 1 1 1 THOMAS P. O BRIEN United States Attorney CHRISTINE C. EWELL Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division CHRISTOPHER BRUNWIN Assistant United States Attorney Deputy Chief, Violent
More informationCase 2:09-cv MCE-KJM Document 32 Filed 08/26/2009 Page 1 of 12
Case :0-cv-0-MCE-KJM Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 Alan Gura (Calif. Bar No. ) Gura & Possessky, PLLC 0 N. Columbus St., Suite 0 Alexandria, VA 0..0/Fax 0.. Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr. (Calif. Bar No. )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM RULING
Tipton et al v. Hudson Specialty Insurance Co et al Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION EUGENE TIPTON AND MILDRED TIPTON VERSUS KEITH LANDEN, ET AL. CIVIL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case File No. 10-CV-00137
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONEIDA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. Case File No. 10-CV-00137 VILLAGE OF HOBART, WISCONSIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF S REPLY BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 9, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 9, 2005 Session RALPH ALLEY, ET AL., v. QUEBECOR WORLD KINGSPORT, INC., d/n/a QUEBECOR WORLD HAWKINS, INC. Direct Appeal from e Circuit Court for Hawkins
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO WOB PLAINTIFFS COMBINED SUR-REPLY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 98-431-WOB KEITH RENE GUY, SR., et al PLAINTIFFS VS. LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, et al DEFENDANTS
More informationCase: 2:13-cv WOB-GFVT-DJB Doc #: 59 Filed: 07/08/13 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 881
Case: 2:13-cv-00068-WOB-GFVT-DJB Doc #: 59 Filed: 07/08/13 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 881 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY COVINGTON DIVISION KENNY BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs Case
More informationCase 9:12-cv KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2013 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:12-cv-80792-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2013 Page 1 of 7 JOHN PINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-80792-Civ-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN vs. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No CV-HLM-4. versus
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 04-13740 D.C. Docket No. 04-00003-CV-HLM-4 SHIRLEY WILLIAMS, GALE PELFREY, BONNIE JONES, LORA SISSON, individually and on behalf
More informationCase 2:07-cv JF-SDP Document 13 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:07-cv-11342-JF-SDP Document 13 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GINNAH MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. Civil No.07-11342 Hon. John
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-503-DJH-CHL
United States of America v. Hargrove et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-503-DJH-CHL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JENNIFER LANE, Plaintiff, v. GRANT COUNTY, a Washington municipal corporation, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Defendant. NO. CV--0-RHW ORDER ADDRESSING POST-TRIAL MOTIONS Before
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Tompkins v. Rite Aid Doc. 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION Larry Tompkins, ) Civil Action No. 8:09-02369-JMC ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JENNIFER L. HIGGINS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) No. 07-0495-CV-W-SOW ) MARGARET SPELLINGS, ) Secy. of e
More informationCase 4:05-cv HFB Document 18 Filed 09/14/2005 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-04050-HFB Document 18 Filed 09/14/2005 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION WESLEY MEREDITH, JR., Individually and as class representative
More informationCase 2:06-cv TJW Document 17 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 2:06-cv-00385-TJW Document 17 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WILLIE RAY, ET AL. Vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-385
More informationNo. 49,116-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * * By: C. A. Martin, III * * * * *
Judgment rendered July 9, 2014. Application for rehearing may be filed wiin e delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 49,116-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * LANDFORD ANTHONY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Donaldson et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION ANTHONY DONALDSON and WANDA DONALDSON, individually and on behalf
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IMTIAZ AHMAD, M.D., CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-8673 Plaintiff, v. AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE, et al., Defendant. IMTIAZ AHMAD, M.D., CIVIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) On March 13, 2019, Plaintiff Elgene Luzon De-Amor,
De-Amor et al v. Cabalas et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ELGENE LUZON DE-AMOR, vs. Plaintiff, BUENAVENTURA C. CABALAN, ET AL., Defendants. CIVIL NO. 19-00128
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BRETT DANIELS and BRETT DANIELS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-1334 SIMON PAINTER, TIMOTHY LAWSON, INTERNATIONAL SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM CRAFTWORLD INTERIORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant vs. KING ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Supreme Court Case No.: CVA97-043 Superior Court Case No.:CV0914-94
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 45 Filed: 08/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:189
Case: 1:16-cv-07054 Document #: 45 Filed: 08/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:189 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SAMUEL LIT, Plaintiff, v. No. 16 C 7054 Judge
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-1341 Document: 31 Filed: 04/11/2014 Page: 1 APRIL DEBOER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT -vs- 6 Cir #14-1341 ED Mi #12-civ-10285 RICHARD SNYDER,
More informationCase 1:13-cv CMA-KLM Document 37 Filed 04/14/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-02063-CMA-KLM Document 37 Filed 04/14/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 Civil Action No. 13-cv-02063-CMA-KLM TAE HYUNG LIM, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
More informationDePaul Law Review. DePaul College of Law. Volume 11 Issue 1 Fall-Winter Article 11
DePaul Law Review Volume 11 Issue 1 Fall-Winter 1961 Article 11 Courts - Federal Procedure - Federal Court Jurisdiction Obtained on Grounds That Defendant Has Claimed and Will Claim More than the Jurisdictional
More informationCase 2:10-cr SRB Document 303 Filed 03/21/12 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cr-0-srb Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 ANN BIRMINGHAM SCHEEL Acting United States Attorney District of Arizona MONICA B. KLAPPER Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No.0 Monica.Klapper@usdoj.gov
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
6:17-cv-00006-RAW Document 25 Filed in ED/OK on 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAVID LANDON SPEED, Plaintiff, v. JMA ENERGY COMPANY, LLC,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO: 8:12-cv-251-T-26TGW O R D E R
Case 8:12-cv-00251-RAL-TGW Document 26 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID 203 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION LUCIANA DE OLIVEIRA, on behalf of herself and ose similarly
More informationJ S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF.
Case :-cv-00-jls-fmo Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF vs. Plaintiffs, THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00259 Document 17 Filed 12/07/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION ELENA CISNEROS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO. B-05-259
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
International-Matex Tank Terminals-Illinois v. Chemical Bank Doc. 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION INTERNATIONAL-MATEX TANK TERMINALS- Case No. 1:08-cv-1200
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM RULING
Case 6:09-cv-01438-RTH-CMH Document 329 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 6865 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION Comar Marine Corp. versus Raider Marine
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION. vs. CASE NO. 5:01cr22-RH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 5:01cr22-RH WILLIAM JEFFERSON, Defendant. / DEFENDANT S SENTENCING
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULLTEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0080p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ADRIAN ENERGY ASSOCIATES,, PlaintiffsAppellants, X v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Beil v. Amco Insurance Company Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PATRICIA BEIL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Case No. 16-cv-356-JPG-PMF ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL
More informationUnited States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge Blanche M. Manning Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned Judge CASE NUMBER 06
More informationCase: 3:15-cv slc Document #: 21 Filed: 12/16/15 Page 1 of 11
Case: 3:15-cv-00300-slc Document #: 21 Filed: 12/16/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JEFFREY BRILL, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-300-slc
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER AND OPINION
DXP Enterprises, Inc. v. Cogent, Inc. et al Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED August 05, 2016
More informationS e n t e n c i n g P a r t n e r s
Published By Joaquin & Duncan, L.L.C.; A Law Firm of Federal Sentencing Attorneys July 2016 S e n t e n c i n g P a r t n e r s About Sentencing Partners: Sentencing Partners is published by Joaquin and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ROY L. DENTON Plaintiff Case No. 1:07-cv-211 v. JURY DEMAND STEVE RIEVLEY Collier/Carter Defendant DEFENDANT STEVE RIEVLEY
More informationU.S. v. SCHWARTZ, Cite as 118 AFTR 2d , Code Sec(s) 7402; 6321, (DC SC), 06/27/2016
Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions American Federal Tax Reports American Federal Tax Reports (Current Year) 2016 AFTR 2d Vol. 118 118 AFTR 2d 2016-5127 -
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. CV T
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11556 D.C. Docket No. CV-05-00530-T THERESA MARIE SCHINDLER SCHIAVO, incapacitated ex rel, Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. JESSE JOE HERNANDEZ, PETITIONER, vs. No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JESSE JOE HERNANDEZ, PETITIONER, vs. No. 3:06-CV-846-P NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Farley v. EIHAB Human Services, Inc. Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT FARLEY and : No. 3:12cv1661 ANN MARIE FARLEY, : Plaintiffs : (Judge Munley)
More informationCase 9:04-cv JMH Document 143 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:04-cv-80159-JMH Document 143 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 04-80159-Civ-HOPKINS PHILIP BARASH, as preliminary
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Simonsen v. Tsunami Capital, LLC Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION STUART SIMONSEN, an individual, CV 08-119-BLG-RFC-CSO vs. Plaintiff, FINDINGS
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI. Consolidated Supplemental Letter Brief
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI May 18, 2012 JIM HOOD ATTORNEY GENERAL CIVIL LITIGATION DIVISION United States Court of Appeals for e Fif Circuit Office of e Clerk Attn: Ms. Sabrina M. Hains 600 S. Maestri Place
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DISTRICT
-JO Mahmood et al v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DISTRICT TALAT MAHMOOD, et al., Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, 10-12723
More informationCriminal Forfeiture Procedure in 2008: A Survey of Developments in the Case Law
Department of Justice From e SelectedWorks of Stefan D Cassella August, 2008 Criminal Forfeiture Procedure in 2008: A Survey of Developments in e Case Law Stefan D Cassella Available at: https://works.bepress.com/stefan_cassella/23/
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:08 MD 1932
Grace et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. Doc. 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:08 MD 1932 IRENE GRACE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER
More informationCase 2:12-cv MJP Document 46 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 DOMAIN TOOLS, LLC, v. RUSS SMITH, pro se, and CONSUMER.NET, LLC, Plaintiff, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION 3:75-CR :06-CV-24-F
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION 3:75-CR-26-3 5:06-CV-24-F UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY R. MacDONALD Defendant UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONER-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Appeal No. 04-3946 (Case No. 00-C-0650 (E.D. Wis.)) WARREN GOODMAN, v. Petitioner-Appellant, DANIEL BERTRAND, Warden, Green Bay Correctional Institution,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 20 March 2018
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-596 Filed: 20 March 2018 Forsyth County, No. 16 CVS 7555 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT B. STIMPSON; and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
More informationv No Clinton Circuit Court DENNIS J. DUCHENE, II, ANN DUCHENE,
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S JOHN THOMAS MILLER and BG&M, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED December 21, 2017 v No. 334731 Clinton Circuit Court DENNIS J. DUCHENE, II,
More informationCase 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-80328-KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 1 of 10 DAVID A. FAILLA and DONNA A. FAILLA, Appellants, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
More informationCase 1:10-cv AJ Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2011 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-24089-AJ Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 KAUSTUBH BADKAR, vs. Plaintiff NCL (BAHAMAS LTD., Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Respondents. Petitioner, Gerald Carter (hereafter, the petitioner ), is a state prisoner
Carter v. State of Sou Carolina et al Doc. 5 6:05-cv-02851-TLW Date Filed 10/06/2005 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Gerald Stephon Carter, #175348; vs.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 11-40631 Document: 00511757371 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and TEXAS SPINE & JOINT HOSPITAL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationCase 6:05-cv CJS-MWP Document 77 Filed 06/12/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:05-cv-06344-CJS-MWP Document 77 Filed 06/12/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SCOTT E. WOODWORTH and LYNN M. WOODWORTH, v. Plaintiffs, REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *
Case :-cv-00-rcj -VPC Document Filed 0// Page of DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney HOLLY A. VANCE Assistant United States Attorney 00 West Liberty Street, Suite 00 Reno, Nevada 0 Tel: ( - Fax: (
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Barbara Waldrup v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al Doc. 148 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys
More informationCase 0:10-cv WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:10-cv-61985-WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GARDEN-AIRE VILLAGE SOUTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC., a Florida
More informationNO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE PETITIONER. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENTS and AMY UNKNOWN
NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE PETITIONER VS. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENTS and AMY UNKNOWN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationCase 1:10-cv NMG Document 224 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 9. United States District Court District of Massachusetts
Case 1:10-cv-12079-NMG Document 224 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 9 United States District Court District of Massachusetts MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SANDOZ INC., Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 7, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 7, 2006 Session CARLTON J. DITTO v. DELAWARE SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. Appeal from e Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 03-1234 Howell N. Peoples,
More informationCase 1:06-cv SLR Document 12 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-00414-SLR Document 12 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE U.S.A. INC., v. Plaintiffs, EPICREALM LICENSING,
More informationCase 2:18-cv LMA-KWR Document 21 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. VERSUS No.
Case 2:18-cv-02804-LMA-KWR Document 21 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THE MCDONNEL GROUP LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS No. 18-2804 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS
More informationCase 2:12-cv JD Document 50 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-03783-JD Document 50 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHERIE LEATHERMAN, both : CIVIL ACTION individually and as the
More informationCAPITAL CASE. No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DONALD WAYNE STROUTH, Petitioner. vs. ROLAND W. COLSON, Warden.
CAPITAL CASE No. 12-7720 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DONALD WAYNE STROUTH, Petitioner vs. ROLAND W. COLSON, Warden Respondent ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 17-3266 American Family Mutual Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllllplaintiff - Appellee v. Vein Centers for Excellence, Inc. llllllllllllllllllllldefendant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2014 Session WILLIAM D. STALKER, ET AL. v. DAVID R. NUTTER, ET AL. Appeal from e Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2008C1 Tom E. Gray, Chancellor
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-563-DJH PRINT FULFILLMENT SERVICES, LLC,
Shelton v. Print Fulfillment Services, LLC Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION TROY SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-563-DJH PRINT FULFILLMENT
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit IN RE BARNES & NOBLE, INC., Petitioner. Miscellaneous Docket No. 162 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the
More informationCase 9:17-cv RLR Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:17-cv-80574-RLR Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:17-CV-80574-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS FRANK CALMES, individually
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Chapman et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BILL M. CHAPMAN, JR. and ) LISA B. CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationCase 6:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Case 6:12-cv-02427 Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY A PUBLIC TRUST,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
THE HONORABLE KAREN A. OVERSTREET Chapter UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 In Re: COURT REPORTING INSTITUTE, INC., Debtor. BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF COURT REPORTING
More information