UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.
|
|
- Joel Wade
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Peter L. Carr, IV (SBN #0) pcarr@siascarr.com SIAS CARR LLP 0 Wilshire Blvd., 0th Fl. # Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: (0) 00-0 Facsimile: () 00- Justin A. Palmer (SBN #0) justin@filerpalmer.com FILER PALMER, LLP 0 Wilshire Blvd., 0th Fl. Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: (0) 0- Facsimile: (0) -00 Co-counsel for Plaintiffs, ERNEST FOSTER; RAYMOND FOSTER, individually; ALONZO FOSTER and MONIQUE FOSTER, minors, by and through their guardian ad litem, RAYMOND FOSTER, individually, and as successors in interest to ERNEST FOSTER, JR., deceased. ERNEST FOSTER, JR., by and through his personal representative, ERNEST FOSTER SR.; RAYMOND FOSTER, individually; ALONZO FOSTER and MONIQUE FOSTER, minors, by and through their guardian ad litem, RAYMOND FOSTER, individually, and as successors in interest to ERNEST FOSTER, JR., deceased vs. CITY OF INDIO; INDIO POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF POLICE RICHARD P. TWISS, individually and in his capacity as Indio Police Chief ; OFFICER JEREMY HELLAWELL, individually and in his capacity as an officer of the Indio Police Department ; and DOES through 0 inclusive, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS UNDER COLOR OF STATE LAW:. UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE ( U.S.C. ). UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE ( U.S.C ). DEPRIVATION OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS ( U.S.C. ). UNCONSTITUTIONAL MUNICIPAL CUSTOMS ( U.S.C. ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
2 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 INTRODUCTION. This is a civil rights and survival action arising from Defendant OFFFICER JEREMY HELLAWELL unjustifiably shooting and killing Mr. Ernest Foster Jr., ( FOSTER or decedent ), on about July, in Indio, California, in violation of MR. FOSTER s constitutionally guaranteed right to life. VENUE AND JURISDICTION. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by U.S.C. and, and arises under U.S.C. and. Venue is proper in this Court because the unlawful acts and practices alleged herein occurred in the City of Indio, California, which is within this judicial district pursuant to U.S.C.. PARTIES. At all times in this Complaint, MR. FOSTER was a resident of the State of California, County of Riverside. MR. FOSTER was a thirty-seven year old, African American male who sustained fatal gunshot wounds to his body on July,.. Plaintiff, ERNEST FOSTER, SR., is the personal representative of ERNEST FOSTER, JR, and one of the members of FOSTER s family eligible to advance this suit.. Plaintiffs RAYMOND FOSTER; ALONZO FOSTER and MONIQUE FOSTER are the natural and biological children of MR. FOSTER, and members of FOSTER s family eligible to advance this suit. All plaintiffs sue in their individual capacities as well as in a representative capacity as personal representative and successors in interest to MR. FOSTER.. At all times herein mentioned defendant CITY OF INDIO was a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California.. At all relevant times defendant RICHARD P. TWISS was and is the Chief of Police of the Indio Police Department, a department of the City of Indio. Chief TWISS is sued herein in his official capacity on all claims, unless expressly stated otherwise.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant Officer JEREMY HELLAWELL was a police officer and detective employed with the Indio Police Department. Defendant Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
3 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 HELLAWELL is sued individually and in his capacity as police officer.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant INDIO POLICE DEPARTMENT ( CIPD ) is an official division of the CITY OF INDIO. The CITY OF INDIO possessed the power and authority to adopt policies and prescribe rules, regulations and practices affecting the operation of the CIPD, its tactics, methods, practices, customs and usages. 0. At all times herein mentioned, defendant TWISS was responsible for and had express and implied authority to make policies for defendant CITY OF INDIO.. At all times herein mentioned, defendant TWISS also had the authority to hire, train, supervise, discipline, and effect the retention determination(s) in regard to defendant CITY OF INDIO s law enforcement officers.. At all relevant times herein, defendant CITY OF INDIO employed Defendants HELLAWELL, TWISS and Does through 0, inclusive.. At all relevant times defendants Does through 0, inclusive were individuals who were employees and/or agents of the City of Indio and/or its Police Department, who were acting under color of the law, statutes, ordinances, policies, practices, customs, and/or usages of the City of Indio, and/or otherwise within the course and scope of their respective duties as employees, and with the complete authority and ratification, of defendant CITY OF INDIO. Said defendants are each in some manner responsible for the injuries and damages complained of herein. The true names of defendants Does through 0, inclusive are presently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue each of these defendants by such fictitious name. Upon ascertaining the true identity of a defendant Doe, PLAINTIFFS will amend this complaint, or seek leave to do so, by inserting the true name in lieu of the fictitious name.. Each defendant promoted, ratified, and approved the wrongful conduct alleged herein of each of the other defendants, and acted in concert with and conspired with each of the other defendants, in doing the wrongful acts complained of herein, as more fully alleged below. Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
4 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS. On July,, MR. FOSTER was in the vicinity of the 00 block of Highway, near the Monroe Street intersection, visiting the owner of the Cig Zone cigarette and tobacco shop.. The weather in the area was clear, sunny, and dry.. Plaintiffs are informed and believed, and on that basis allege that defendant HELLAWELL was patrolling the area as a single-man car on July, at approximately :0 p.m. Plaintiffs are further informed and believe, and on that basis allege that defendant HELLAWELL received a call from radio dispatch instructing him to respond to the 00 block of Highway, near the Monroe Street intersection. The alleged dispatch concerned a citizen brandishing a weapon.. Plaintiffs are informed and believed, and on that basis allege that defendant HELLAWELL was the first respondent to the location and confronted MR. FOSTER without backup or assistance from any other CIPD officer.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege that defendant HELLAWELL arrived at the location, without backup or assistance from any other CIPD officer and ordered MR. FOSTER to stop without providing any lawful reason or explanation for attempting to detain him. MR. FOSTER, then fearing a wrongful detention and possible unlawful use of force by defendant HELLAWELL, attempted to peacefully leave the vicinity by running in the opposite direction. Eyewitnesses confirm that defendant HELLAWELL did not offer any lawful reason or explanation for attempting to stop or detain MR. FOSTER.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege that a foot pursuit began after MR. FOSTER attempted to peacefully leave the vicinity by running. During the foot pursuit, defendant HELLAWELL, unjustifiably and unreasonably, fired an electroshock weapon (e.g. stun gun ) on MR. FOSTER, without backup or assistance from any other CIPD officer; without warning or probable cause that MR. FOSTER had committed a crime and without requesting any information from MR. FOSTER prior to Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
5 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 drawing his Taser weapon. Eyewitnesses confirm that MR. FOSTER attempted to peacefully leave the vicinity prior to defendant HELLAWELL firing his weapon.. Defendant HELLAWELL s unjustified and unreasonable attempt to apprehend MR. FOSTER via stun gun was unsuccessful, in that the metal probe dart prongs did not make contact with Mr. FOSTER s skin. MR. FOSTER, then fearing for his safety, continued to run away from defendant HELLAWELL who acted without backup or assistance from CIPD officers and continued to give chase without requesting information from, or provide information to, MR. FOSTER.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege that during the foot pursuit, defendant HELLAWELL again, without backup or assistance from any other CIP officer; without warning or probable cause that MR. FOSTER had committed a crime; without requesting any information from MR. FOSTER and without provocation -- unjustifiably and unreasonably drew his standard issue duty weapon.. MR. FOSTER continued to peacefully run for many yards, continuing into the clearly visible and unabated alleyway of the 00 location. At this point, defendant HELLAWELL fired two unlawful and unjustified rounds into MR. FOSTER s back as he continued to run away from him. Defendant HELLAWELL never ordered MR. FOSTER to stop or freeze. In fact, defendant HELLAWELL never issued any verbal commands during the pursuit.. While showing no threat by a deadly weapon, defendant HELLAWELL fired two shots at MR. FOSTER that struck him in his back and body.. Defendant HELLAWELL shot at least two times throughout the incident in violation of MR. FOSTER s constitutionally guaranteed rights to: (i) be free from the use of excessive force; (ii) the right to life; (iii) due process under the law; and (iv) equal protection under the law.. The shots fired by defendant HELLAWELL actually and proximately caused MR. FOSTER s death. Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
6 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0. Several eyewitnesses confirm that MR. FOSTER did not pose any threat to defendant HELLAWELL, or any other person in the vicinity.. Prior to his death, MR. FOSTER endured a substantial amount of conscious pain and suffering from the moment he was first shot by defendant HELLAWELL until his body ultimately succumbed to death by at least two gunshot wounds to the back.. MR. FOSTER was treated at the scene of the shooting by emergency personnel from Riverside County/CAL FIRE, who then transported him to John F. Kennedy Hospital in Indio, California. Despite the efforts of hospital personnel to resuscitate Mr. FOSTER, he was pronounced dead of cardiac arrest at approximately :00 p.m. on July,. 0. MR. FOSTER s lifeless body remained on the ground in an undignified manner as blood streamed from his back onto the asphalt while several eyewitnesses from the community watched in despair and disbelief.. Defendant HELLAWELL s supervisor arrived at the scene shortly after MR. FOSTER was shot and killed.. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege that as of the date of the incident, CIPD had been involved with at least officer-involved shootings since January,. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF UNDER U.S.C. FOR UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE (By plaintiffs as personal representative and successors in interest against all defendants except defendant City of Indio). Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation in paragraphs through, inclusive, of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiffs bring this claim for relief in their capacity as the personal representative and successors in interest of MR. FOSTER, for whom there is no estate opened, under California Code of Civil Procedure.. The foregoing claim for relief Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
7 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 arose in MR. FOSTER s favor, and MR. FOSTER would have been the plaintiff with respect to this claim for relief had he survived the fatal wound to his back.. The use of the force against MR. FOSTER was excessive and unreasonable, and deprived MR. FOSTER of his right to be secure in his person against unreasonable seizures guaranteed him by the Fourth Amendment to the US. Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, in violation of Title U.S.C... Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege that Chief TWISS set in motion a series of acts by his subordinates Does -0 that he knew or reasonably should have known would cause said subordinates to deprive the MR. FOSTER of these rights, knew, or reasonably should have known, that said subordinates were engaging in these acts and that their conduct would deprive MR. FOSTER of these rights, failed to act to prevent said subordinates from engaging in such conduct, acquiesced in said constitutional deprivations, due to his action or inaction in the training, supervision, or control of said subordinates, and/or otherwise engaged in conduct that showed a reckless or callous indifference to the rights of MR. FOSTER.. As a direct result thereof the aforesaid acts and omissions of defendants, MR. FOSTER suffered great physical and mental injury, fear and emotional distress, trauma, pain, shock to his nervous system, injury to his health, strength and activity, and ultimately death, and loss of the enjoyment of life and the love, care, society, companionship, support and affection of his family members, in an amount according to proof.. As a further direct result of the acts of defendants, plaintiffs have incurred expenses, including funeral and burial expenses, in an amount according to proof.. The conduct of defendants, and each of them, alleged above was willful, wanton, malicious, and done with reckless disregard for the rights and safety of MR. FOSTER and therefore warrants the imposition of exemplary damages in an amount according to proof sufficient to punish and make an example. Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
8 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SECOND CLAIM OF RELIEF FOR UNDER U.S.C. FOR UNLAWFUL SEIZURE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE (By plaintiffs individually against all defendants except defendant City of Indio) 0. Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege and hereby incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs through of this Complaint as if set forth herein in full.. The use of the aforesaid force against MR. FOSTER was excessive and unreasonable, and deprived MR. FOSTER of his right to be secure in his person against unreasonable seizures guaranteed him by the Fourth Amendment to the US. Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, in violation of Title U.S.C... Plaintiffs are the proper parties with standing pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure.0 to pursue this wrongful death claim pursuant to Title U.S.C... As a direct result of the acts of defendants alleged above, plaintiffs have been damaged, suffering pecuniary loss and other compensable injuries resulting from loss of love, society, comfort, attention, services, and support of MR. FOSTER, in an amount in accordance with proof.. As a further direct result of the acts of defendants, plaintiffs have incurred expenses, including funeral and burial expenses, in an amount according to proof. Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 THIRD CLAIM OF RELIEF FOR UNDER U.S.C. FOR DEPRIVATION OF THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFFS FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH MR. FOSTER (By plaintiffs individually against all defendants except defendant City of Indio). Plaintiffs repeat and re-allege and hereby incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs through of this Complaint if set forth herein in full.. Plaintiffs had a cognizable interest under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in being free from state actions that deprive them of life, liberty, or property in such a manner as to shock the conscience, including but not limited to, unwarranted state interference in their to a parental and familial relationship with their father, MR. FOSTER.. The use of force against MR. FOSTER by defendants, acting under color of law, shocks the conscience, was unrelated to any legitimate law enforcement objective, done with the intent to harm MR. FOSTER, and done in reckless disregard of the rights of plaintiffs herein.. The use of said force deprived plaintiffs of their substantive due process rights not to have their familial association infringed upon or interfered with in an unwarranted manner, or to be deprived by the loss of life of their father, thereby depriving them of rights, privileges, and immunities under the US. Constitution, in violation of Title U.S.C... As a direct result of the aforesaid acts of said defendants, plaintiffs have suffered and will suffer great physical and mental injury, trauma, pain, shock to their nervous system, anguish, anxiety, humiliation, fear and emotional distress, and the loss of the love, care, society, companionship, support, and affection of their loved one, all to their damage in an amount according to proof. 0. By reason of the aforesaid acts of defendants, plaintiffs have required or will in the future be required to receive hospital, medical, doctor, and nursing care and Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
10 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Page ID #:0 0 treatment, and by reason thereof, will incur expenses related thereto in an amount to be proven at trial.. As a further direct result of defendants acts, plaintiffs incurred funeral and burial expenses, in an amount according to proof.. The conduct of defendants alleged above was willful, wanton, malicious, and done with reckless disregard for the rights and safety of MR. FOSTER and plaintiffs and therefore warrants the imposition of exemplary damages in an amount according to proof sufficient to punish and make an example. FOURTH CLAIM OF RELIEF UNDER U.S.C. FOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL MUNICIPAL CUSTOMS, PRACTICES AND POLICIES (Against defendants City of Indio and Richard P. Twiss, in his official capacity). Plaintiffs hereby repeat and re-allege and each and every allegation contained in paragraphs through of this Complaint as if set forth herein in full.. Plaintiffs sue under this claim in both their individual capacities and as survivors in interest of MR. FOSTER.. Chief TWISS is sued under this claim in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Indio (not in his individual capacity).. The unconstitutional actions of the individual defendants and as well as other officers/agents employed by or acting on behalf of defendants, as alleged above, which directly caused MR. FOSTER S death, were the result of the following unconstitutional customs, policies and/or practices of defendants, which were ordered, directed, tolerated, encouraged, approved, allowed, acquiesced in and/or ratified by defendants: a. the use or tolerance of excessive and deadly force against unarmed, fleeing individuals, thereby creating situations which become escalated so that the unreasonably and unnecessarily aggressive tactics that officers/ agents use are more likely to involve substantial physical, excessive and/or deadly force against those very same fleeing individuals; Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx 0
11 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 b. the deprivation of access to the courts by engaging in a cover-up of violations of constitutional rights, to wit: allowing, tolerating, and/or encouraging officers/agents to file false reports, make false statements, obstruct and/or interfere with investigations of unconstitutional or unlawful conduct, by withholding and/or concealing material information, and evidence, and ignoring and/or failing to adequately investigate and discipline unconstitutional or unlawful activity.. Alternatively, defendants were deliberately indifferent to the rights and safety of individuals by their failure to institute, maintain and enforce appropriate policies regarding proper tactics and practices for dealing with individuals, including the use of deadly force on those individuals.. Defendants further failed to properly train, instruct, monitor, supervise, and discipline the individual defendants herein, and other officers and agents of defendants, in the proper use of deadly force, including that with respect to the handling fleeing suspects.. The need to train and supervise officers and agents in the constitutional limitations in the use of deadly force is so obvious that the defendants failure to do so amounts to deliberate indifference to constitutional rights and/or gross negligence. 0. Defendants had the obligation and duty to control the officers and agents under their command. The actions of defendants as outlined constitutes conscious and callous deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of MR. FOSTER and the plaintiffs.. These unconstitutional actions and/or omissions by the defendants sued under this claim and of the individual defendants, and other officers/agents, as described above, were ordered, directed, encouraged, approved, tolerated, allowed, acquiesced in, and/or ratified by the highest acting officers/agents of defendant CITY OF INDIO.. The aforementioned policies, practices and customs of defendants, as well as their failure to properly and adequately train, instruct, monitor, supervise, and discipline, were a moving force and direct cause of the deprivations of MR. FOSTER s and Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
12 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 plaintiffs clearly established and well-settled constitutional rights, in Violation of U.S.C... As a direct result of defendants actions alleged herein, plaintiffs were damaged as alleged in paragraphs through of this complaint. PRAYER WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray judgment against Defendants and each of them, as to all Claims for Relief:. For compensatory, general, special and incidental damages, in amounts according to proof;. For costs of suit necessarily incurred;. For reasonable attorneys fees and expenses of litigation; and. For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. As to the Second and Fourth Claims for Relief:. For punitive and exemplary damages against defendants in an amount sufficient to punish defendants and make an example. Dated: June, Respectfully Submitted SIAS CARR LLP FILER PALMER, LLP By: Justin A. Palmer Peter Carr, IV Attorneys for Plaintiffs ERNEST FOSTER, SR.; RAYMOND FOSTER, individually; ALONZO FOSTER and MONIQUE FOSTER, minors, by and through their guardian ad litem, RAYMOND FOSTER, individually, and as successors in interest to ERNEST FOSTER, JR., deceased Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
13 Case :-cv-00 Document - Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs request a trial by jury on all claims. Dated: June, Respectfully Submitted, SIAS CARR LLP FILER PALMER, LLP By: Justin A. Palmer Peter Carr, IV Attorneys for Plaintiffs ERNEST FOSTER, SR.; RAYMOND FOSTER, individually; ALONZO FOSTER and MONIQUE FOSTER, minors, by and through their guardian ad litem, RAYMOND FOSTER, individually, and as successors in interest to ERNEST FOSTER, JR., deceased Macintosh HD:Users:justinpalmer:Dropbox:Filer-Palmer:Open Cases:Civil:Ernest Foster, Jr.:Pleadings:Foster Federal Complaint (final).docx
Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN ADANTÉ D. POINTER, Esq. SBN MELISSA C. NOLD, Esq. SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite
More informationCase 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative
More informationAttorney for Plaintiffs A.C. a minor and C.C. a minor
Case :-cv-00-jam-efb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 PANISH SHEA & BOYLE, LLP Brian Panish (Bar No. 00) bpanish@psblaw.com Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile:
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LATEEF H. GRAY, Esq./State Bar #00 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 0) dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 00 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 0 Woodland Hills, California Telephone:
More informationCase 5:13-cv PSG-AJW Document 22 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:256
Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: S. DOUGLAS ST., SUITE 0, EL SEGUNDO, CA 0 Telephone: ()--0; Facsimile: (00) - Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: COMES
More informationCase: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case: 4:17-cv-02017 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI KAREN POWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No.: 4:17-CV-2017
More informationCase 2:17-at Document 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 9
Case :-at-0 Document Filed // Page of JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN BEN NISENBAUM, Esq. SBN MELISSA C. NOLD, Esq. SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Oakport Street, Suite Oakland, California Telephone: ()
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ESTATE OF ROSHAD MCINTOSH, ) Deceased, by Cynthia
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed // Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq., SBN MELISSA NOLD, Esq., SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center Oakport St., Suite Oakland,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 R. Rex Parris, Esq. (SBN: Jason P. Fowler, Esq. (SBN: Ryan K. Kahl, Esq. (SBN: Sean J. Lowe, Esq. (SBN: R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM 0th Street West Lancaster,
More informationCase 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 210-cv-01126-TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9 MARK A. FLORES (8429) CORPORON & WILLIAMS, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 405 South Main Street, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone 801-328-1162
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
DLS/D ERFSIFIED LEGAL SERVICES, INC 1-0- FILro CIVIL SUSINESS OFFICE ; 1- RAL DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 P. CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN, SB# ARDALAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC 0 Canoga Ave., Suite Woodland Hills, CA 1 Telephone:
More informationCase 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:16-cv-02164-KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8 R. Brendan Dummigan, OSB 932588 brendan@pickettdummigan.com J. Randolph Pickett, OSB 721974 randy@pickettdummigan.com PICKETT DUMMIGAN LLP 621
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com
More information)(
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN
More informationCase 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-05206-VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X KENNETH
More information2:15-cv MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/01/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:15-cv-11252-MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/01/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ERICA MOORE as ) Personal Representative of the ) Estate of
More informationCase3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5
Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN
More informationCase3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8
Case:0-cv-00-EMC Document Filed0//0 Page of LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS Panos Lagos, Esq. / SBN 0 Woodminster Lane Oakland, CA 0 ( 0)0-0 ( 0)0-FAX panoslagos@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS
More informationSUMMONS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION 2017-CP-42- COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG DELTON JASPER and BAKARI SELLERS, As Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of DELVIN TYRELL SIMMONS, Deceased, v. Plaintiff, SPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE;
More informationCase: 1:18-cv MPM-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/03/18 1 of 16 PageID #: 1
Case: 1:18-cv-00193-MPM-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/03/18 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MORKITER JONES PLAINTIFF VS. CAUSE
More informationCase 1:10-cv OWW-GSA Document 2 Filed 04/06/2010 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-00-OWW-GSA Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. SBN STEVEN R. YOURKE, ESQ. SBN 0 Oakport St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA, Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0)
More informationCase 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-00445-PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 MARK L. SHURTLEFF (USB 4666) SHURTLEFF LAW FIRM, PC P.O. Box 900873 Sandy, Utah 84090 (801) 441-9625 mark@shurtlefflawfirm.com Attorney for
More informationCase 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:06-cv-00366-JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ALICE WALKER, individually CIVIL ACTION and as guardian, of her husband,
More informationCase 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com
More informationCase 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-00018-GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DARREN FINDLING, as Personal Representative for The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed 0//0 Page of Steven E. Harrison, Esq. (No. 00) N. Patrick Hall, Esq. (No. 0) WALLIN HARRISON PLC South Higley Road, Suite 0 Gilbert, Arizona Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:
More informationCase 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 111-cv-02300-JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 223 MARK B. FROST & ASSOCIATES BY Mark B. Frost BY Ryan M. Lockman Pier 5 at Penn s Landing 7 N. Columbus Blvd. Philadelphia, PA
More informationYOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF GREENVILLE Amber Childs Howard, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jordan Barry Howard, vs. Plaintiff(s), Steve Loftis in his official capacity as the Sheriff
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/13/17 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:17-cv-00076 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/13/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION CESAR CUELLAR, SR. individually and as the administrator
More informationv. Civil Action No. 3:09-cv PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT A. Parties
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, DALLAS DIVISION WYONDA HILL INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESATE OF DARNELL CHESTER, DECEASED Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-00013-LGW-RSB Document 1 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION LISA VERONICA VARNADORE, ) individually and
More informationthe Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it
0 0 the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES -0 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it without notice or a hearing, as Michael Lee first learned at the hearing on his motion for the return of his
More informationCase 2:10-cv GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-14942-GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES JONES as ) Personal Representative of the ) Estate
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 1:09-cv-00155-JRH-WLB Document 1 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 22 DUSTIN MYERS and RODNEY MYERS. Plaintiffs, VS. MURRY BOWMAN, Individually, and as the Chief Magistrate of Jefferson County, Georgia; WILEY
More information2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1
2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DWAYNE THOMAS Vs Plaintiff, Judge Magistrate Case No:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual
More informationCase 5:16-cv RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 5:16-cv-00016-RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION EVELYN GRIGSBY and DENNIS GRIGSBY,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:10-cv-02411-JDW-EAJ Document 1 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BELINDA BROADERS, AS PARENT, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FOR AND
More informationto redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.
MICHAEL D. SUAREZ ID# 011921976 SUAREZ & SUAREZ 2016 Kennedy Boulevard Jersey City, New Jersey 07305 (201) 433-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan Plaintiff, ANTHONY TRUCHAN vs. SUPERIOR COURT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-at-00 Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 0 SANFORD JAY ROSEN ERNEST GALVAN 0 AMY WHELAN SUMANA COOPPAN ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Montgomery Street, 0th Floor San Francisco, California 0- Telephone:
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationCase 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case :0-cv-00-CW Document Filed 0//00 Page of JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite 0 Oakland,
More information3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationPlaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as
David W. Dow (#00) Ddowlaw1@gmail.com Jennifer L. Levine (#001) jlevine@ddowlaw.com DOW LAW OFFICE E. Camelback #1 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Office: 0..0 Direct: 0-0-1 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 1:15-cv-01336-PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NATALIE THOMPSON, as next friend for D.B., a minor, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationCase 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of
More informationSummons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-06959 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RICKY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Case 3:18-cv-01452 Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 NATHANIEL DEVERS; CORY SHIMENSKY; and, STEPHEN SHIMENSKY, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
More informationPlaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:17-cv-13241-BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/03/17 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SHARON STEIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ROBERT B. SYKES (#3180 bob@sykesinjurylaw.com ALYSON E. CARTER (#9886 alyson@sykesinjurylaw.com ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 311 South State Street, Suite 240 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone
More informationCase 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationCASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00824-PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil File No.:12-CV-824 (PJS/TNL) WILLIAM DEMONE WALKER ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) AMENDED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ROBYN SPAINHOWARD as ) Administratrix of the Estate of ) MICHAEL ZENNIE DIAL II, deceased ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
JANE DOE, Individual And As Next Friend Of LISA DOE, AND LISA DOE, Individual, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23
Case 4:17-cv-01268 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION KHALIL EL-AMIN, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationPlaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the
Case 5:15-cv-02000-EGS,...,.., Document 1 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 0 of 11 FILED IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE APR 16 2015 EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ml S C'fSL E. KUNZ, Clerk ERIKA TARNOSKI
More informationled FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.
0 0 Benjamin P. Tryk, Esq. () John R. Waterman, Esq. () TRYK LAW, P.C. N. Howard St., Ste. 0 Fresno, California 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Email: ben@tryklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MABEL
More informationCase 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 Garo Mardirossian, Esq., #1 garo@garolaw.com Armen Akaragian, Esq., #0 aakaragian@garolaw.com MARDIROSSIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Professional Law Corporation Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 00-001
More information.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,
.. RANDY P. DAVENPORT, ESQ. Attorney-At-Law 50 Park Place, Suite 825 Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 623-5551 * Fax (973) 623-6868 Attorney for Plaintiff, Salah Williams rndavennortaaacom SALAH WILLIAMS,
More informationCase 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Case 1:13-cv-00076-MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 tv 13-0076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------- Y ANAHIT PAPILLA x r COMPLAINT AND JURY
More informationCOMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES
Case 6:17-cv-06004-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DUDLEY T. SCOTT, Plaintiff, -vs- CITY OF ROCHESTER, MICHAEL L. CIMINELLI,
More informationCase 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Case 3:14-cv-17321 Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA STEVEN MATTHEW WEBB, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No.:
Case :-cv-0-smb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Marc J. Victor, SBN 00 Jody L. Broaddus, SN 00 ATTORNEYS FOR FREEDOM South Price Road Chandler, Arizona Phone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -00 Marc@AttorneyForFreedom.com
More informationCase 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREN L. PIPER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) vs. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CITY OF PITTSBURGH; ) JOHN DOE NO. 1 of the
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW
3526.000 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DUPAGE ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION Douglas Walgren, Individually and as Independent Administrator
More informationCase 2:17-cv JS-GRB Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 2:17-cv-07185-JS-GRB Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EVELYN RODRIGUEZ individually and, as administrator of the Goods,
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-09244 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ALMA BENITEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. ) vs. ) Judge
More informationIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Susan Doxtator, Arlie Doxtator, and Sarah Wunderlich, as Special Administrators of the Estate of Jonathon C. Tubby, Plaintiffs, Case
More informationU NITED STATES DISTRICT C OURT tor the
Case 1:12-cv-00992-RWS Document 1 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 7 J\0 440 (Rev. 12/09 Summons in a Civil Action Chelsea Elliot and Jeanne Mansfield P/ainriff v. The City of New York, New York Police Department,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV
Case 1:13-cv-00674-ACK-RLP Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242 255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-1108 Facsimile:
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 189934) Americans for Safe Access P.O. Box 427112 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone: (415) 573-7842
More informationCase 6:12-bk MJ Doc 2507 Filed 06/13/18 Entered 06/13/18 15:58:51 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 112
Main Document Page 1 of 112 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAUL R. GLASSMAN (State Bar No. 76536) FRED NEUFELD (State Bar No. 150759) STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:10-cv-05593 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION KURT KOPEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY
More informationPlaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WILLIE NEVIUS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : Docket No. : vs. : : : COMPLAINT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ; : JOSEPH FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY
More information2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
2:16-cv-02046-HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 E-FILED Friday, 19 February, 2016 02:32:45 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
More informationTAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-jr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Jeff Dominic Price SBN 00 Broadway, Suite Santa Monica, California 00 jeff.price@icloud.com Tel. 0.. Attorney for the plaintiff TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:12-cv-05987 Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LASHONN WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. No. COMPLAINT CITY OF TACOMA, RYAN KOSKOVICH,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRCT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: JAMES S. TERRELL (SBN #00) Anacapa Road Victorville, California (0) -0 fax (0) - jim@talktoterrell.com SHARON J. BRUNNER, (SBN: ) Law Office of Sharon
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationCase 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)
Case 1:17-cv-00628-RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) DELVON L. KING * 2021 Brooks Drive District Heights, MD
More informationCase 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT
Case 1:12-cv-00574-S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GENERAL JONES, Plaintiff vs. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, by and through
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
T SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â FELITA LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of L.M., FELITA
More informationPlaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES
LIEBLING MALAMUT, LLC Adam S. Malamut - Attorney ID No.: 019101999 Keith J. Gentes - Attorney ID No.: 036612009 1939 Route 70 East, Suite 220 Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 856.424.1808 856.424.2032 (1) WWW.1,1\41awN.I.com
More informationCase 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 6:14-cv-00227-JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT MCCOLLOM Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More information