AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, a Final Merits Hearing was held on

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, a Final Merits Hearing was held on"

Transcription

1 STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Sherman Adams, Employee /Claimant, vs. Vision Quest National Ltd. /Crum & Forster, Employer /Carrier /Servicing Agent. OJCC Case No MAD Accident date: 5/21/2015 Judge: Mary A. D'Ambrosio / FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, a Final Merits Hearing was held on September 8, Present for the hearing were Sherman Adams, Claimant, Alan Aronson, Esq., counsel for the Claimant and Andrew Borah, Esq., counsel for the Employer /Carrier. The Petitions for Benefits at issue were filed on January 28, 2016 and February 19, CLAIMS 1. Authorization of cervical facet block injections per Dr. Krost; 2. Payment of TPD benefits from 1/8/16 to present and continuing; 3. Attorney's fees. DEFENSES TPD; 1. Misrepresentation pursuant to F.S and F.S ; 2. The Employer terminated the Claimant for misconduct and no entitlement to 3. Attorney's fees are not due and owing. STIPULATIONS MADE AT TIME OF HEARING 1. The parties agree to an average weekly wage of $ The parties agree the Claimant is not at maximum medical improvement. EXHIBITS 1. Pretrial Stipulation filed June 30, Judge's Exhibit #1; Page 1 of 11

2 2. Notice of Denial - Claimant's Exhibit #1; 3. Records of Dr. Stuart Krost - Claimant's Exhibit #2; 4. Petitions for Benefits (composite) - Joint Exhibit #1; 5. Deposition of Sherman Adams - Joint Exhibit #2; 6. Deposition of Rob Iezzi - Joint Exhibit #3; 7. Deposition of Claims Adjuster, Chandra Esser - Joint Exhibit #4; 8. Notice of Defense - Employer /Carrier's Exhibit #1; The audio CD submitted by the Employer /Carrier was marked as Proffer "A" for identification for the Employer /Carrier. The Claimant's objection to admission of the CD was sustained pursuant to F.S , and Extensive argument of counsel was considered which is evident in the record of the proceeding. Proferred testimony of Mr. Iezzi regarding the audio CD was placed on the record outside of the presence of the undersigned Judge. Live testimony was taken from Sherman Adams, Keith Johnson and Rob Iezzi. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Claimant was employed as a Childcare Worker at Vision Quest, a shelter for children in the Department of Children and Families (DCF) system. There are seven homes in Palm Beach County and the Claimant had the responsibility of mentoring, counseling, providing life skills and monitoring children in the homes. 2. The Claimant's supervisor through July, 2015 was Keith Johnson. Mr. Johnson provided testimony at the Final Hearing. He is the former Chief Administrator and is no longer employed with Vision Quest, being asked to resign in July, He was subpoenaed to attend the final hearing and provide testimony for the Employer /Carrier. Mr. Johnson testified as to the duties of a Childcare Worker at Vision Quest. He described the Claimant as a "below average" employee with questionable behavior. On one occasion he was in the residence hall and overheard the Claimant addressing the youth calling them "losers" and "delinquents ". He does not recall the date this occurred. He did not place this incident in writing but testified he advised the Claimant that his behavior was not acceptable or tolerated. Page 2 of 11

3 He testified there was a staff meeting with a new Program Director for the purpose of implementing new procedures. The Claimant became angry and he told the Claimant to calm down. He testified as to an incident with Child Net, a company that contracts with Vision Quest and represents DCF. There was a visit from Martha, the Child Net representative. The Claimant allegedly became adversarial when Martha questioned the food and cleanliness in the home. Martha sent an alleging the disrespectful comments. The Claimant personally called Mr. Johnson and they discussed Martha's complaint. Mr. Johnson told the Claimant his behavior was inappropriate, disrespectful and would not be tolerated in the future. Mr. Johnson considered these three instances to be reprimands. He was unaware of any written documentation of these conversations in the Claimant's personnel file and left his employment involuntarily in July, He testified that Vision Quest provided training and refresher training for all employees. If an employee needed additional training they would be given it. Any evidence of additional training would be in the employee's personnel file. He thought the Claimant had this additional training Mr. Johnson also testified to being positive that the Claimant was sent home without pay for the incident with Martha. 3. Robert Iezzi testified at the hearing and in deposition. He is the current Chief Administrator for Vision Quest since August 23, He took over from Keith Johnson, but has never met Mr. Johnson nor spoken with him. His duties include overseeing the program managing contracts and employees, financial and budgeting. Terminating employees is part of his job. He doesn't know when or how he first met the Claimant but considered himself the Claimant's supervisor. He testified he was aware of prior misconduct exhibited by the Claimant. Page 3 of 11

4 He testified he has personal knowledge that the Claimant was advised about past unacceptable behavior, although nothing is written in his personnel file and he did not indicate how he had learned this knowledge. He was aware from the personnel file of an incident on May 29, 2015 involving an between Sevon Jobes and Child Net. The indicated the Claimant "was suspended today for behavior ". He had no personal knowledge of this incident other than reading what was in the . He cannot speak to whether the Claimant attended a special behavioral class as he does not know. On September 4, 2015, Mr. Iezzi was in the courthouse waiting for the Claimant to transport a youth from the home for a hearing. He testified he and the Claimant were on the phone several times that day because they were running late to court. After the hearing, Mr. Iezzi was driving the youth back to the home and had a voice message on his phone from the Claimant. He listened to it and testified the Claimant was on the other end cursing at the youth using vulgar language. This audio recording was proffered on the record outside of my presence as it was not admitted into evidence. Mr. Iezzi testified that the Claimant returned back to the home and, at that time, he told the claimant that his conduct was unsatisfactory and he terminated him. He testified the youth involved complained of the incident to him, but nothing was written up. The evidence is conflicting as to whether Mr. Iezzi was alone when he terminated the Claimant or whether Savon Jobes, the Program Director and Terry Price, the Human Resource representative were present. 4. A termination letter dated September 4, 2015 was produced at Mr. Iezzi's deposition and signed by Mr. Jobes, Mr. Price and Mr. Iezzi. There is a handwritten documentation on the bottom of the form referencing the voice message incident. Mr. Iezzi testified this was not his handwriting, but it did contain his initials. Several times throughout his Page 4 of 11

5 testimony both in trial and in deposition, Mr. Iezzi had extreme difficulty recalling or remembering several events including who was present when the termination occurred. 5. The adjuster, Chandra Esser, testified by deposition. The Claimant's accident was accepted as compensable with injuries to the neck and left shoulder. Med Express, Dr. Waeltz and Dr. Krost were authorized. Indemnity benefits were paid in the form of temporary partial disability from June 19, 2015 through July 1, The carrier authorized one facet injection on the recommendation of Dr. Krost which was performed on September 11, The adjuster has received 2 Petitions for Benefits. She did not file any Response to the second Petition for Benefits. She has not had any conversations with Savon Jobes, Keith Jackson or Robert Iezzi regarding the Claimant's termination. She filed a Notice of Denial on June 3, 2016 denying all future benefits based on the misrepresentation defense under F.S and F.S She based the defense upon testimony given by the Claimant at his deposition although she admitted she has never read the deposition of the Claimant. She relied upon a deposition summary from her defense counsel. She is unaware that the Claimant received unemployment compensation benefits after his termination. She based the misrepresentation defense on the Claimant's deposition testimony that he was terminated because of his injury and was told he was a liability by his employer, rather than for using vulgar language and exhibiting unprofessional behavior. 6. The records of Dr. Krost indicate the Claimant has been assigned work -related restrictions of no carrying or lifting over 25 pounds, no pushing or pulling over 25 pounds, no overhead lifting over 10 pounds and sitting and walking 1 to 2 hours without changing position. The Claimant has never been placed at maximum medical improvement. Dr. Krost recommended three facet blocks, and the Claimant has only had one to date. Page 5 of 11

6 7. The Claimant testified at the final hearing and in deposition. It is his testimony that he was nothing but a professional while working for Vision Quest. He could not recall if he ever used vulgar language, but he denied using any vulgar language on the day he was terminated. He denies leaving a voice message for Mr. Iezzi on September 4, He testified he had never been reprimanded for using vulgar language or unprofessional behavior. He testified he has never called the children "losers" or "delinquents ". He testified he did not recall any verbal reprimands from Keith Johnson. He characterized Mr. Johnson's instructions to be with regard to tasks versus policy violations. He testified that there has never been any conduct written up in his personnel file. The Claimant testified that on the day he was terminated, Terry Wright, Savon Jobes and Robert Iezzi were present. He testified Mr. Iezzi did not discuss the voice message at all. He testified he was told he was too aggressive, was considered a liability and would have to be let go. He testified he was told that it was Vision Quest's fault for not providing sufficient training. He was not given the opportunity to respond, did not sign any paper work, and was not given any paperwork regarding the termination. 8. The Claimant denied being suspended without pay on May 29, The evidence reveals a pay stub which covers May 29th showing the Claimant was paid biweekly for 80 regular hours +3 hours overtime. Mr. Iezzi testified that this pay stub alone does not prove that the Claimant was paid on May 29th. The Claimant argues it is proof that he was paid on May 29. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Florida Statute (4)(b) states: "an employee shall not be entitled to compensation or benefits under this chapter if any judge of compensation claims determines Page 6 of 11

7 that the employee has knowingly or intentionally engaged in any of the acts described in s or any criminal act for the purpose of securing workers compensation benefits." 2. Florida Statute (4)(b) states: "It shall be unlawful for any person: 1. To knowingly make, or cause to be made, any false, fraudulent or misleading oral or written statement for the purpose of obtaining or denying any benefit or payment under this chapter. 2. To present or cause to be presented any written or oral statement as part of, or in support of, a claim for payment or other benefit pursuant to any provision of this chapter, knowing that such statement contains any false, incomplete, or misleading information concerning any fact or thing material to such claim. 3. To prepare or cause to be prepared any written or oral statement that is intended to be presented to any employer, insurance company, or self -insurance program in connection with, or in support of, any claim for payment or other benefit pursuant to any provision of this chapter, knowing that such statement contains any false, incomplete, or misleading information concerning any fact or thing material to such claim." 3. I find that the testimony of Mr. Iezzi, at the hearing and in deposition, is lacking in sufficient detail due to his lack of recall on crucial details regarding the Claimant's termination. I find it unbelievable that Mr. Iezzi, when terminating the Claimant, cannot recall whether anyone was in the room with him at the time he performed the firing. Even when presented with the termination letter signed by two other coworkers, his testimony remained that he could not recall who was in the office with him and the Claimant. His testimony lacks credibility as to the order of events in which the termination took place. The Claimant's point is well taken that if the termination was based upon the voice message, the voice message incident should have been listed in the body of the termination letter and not as a footnote at the bottom. It is unclear when that footnote was written as Mr. Iezzi Page 7 of 11

8 denied that it was his handwriting. Additionally, the Claimant was never given a chance to dispute the allegations against him. 4. The Claimant argues that any misstatements in the May 9, 2016 deposition regarding prior reprimands could not have been made for the purpose of securing workers compensation benefits since, at that time, he was still receiving Worker's Compensation benefits and the claim had not been denied. I reject this argument as it is clear from the record that the Claimant had two Petitions for Benefits pending, the first requesting a series of 3 epidural injections (for which the Claimant had only received one to date), and a Petition for temporary partial disability benefits from January 8, 2016 (when the unemployment compensation benefits ran out and the claimant was without employment) to the present. 5. The adjuster's testimony does not lend any support to the misrepresentation defense as it is clear she was only acting, in filing the Notice of Denial, on the defense counsel's recommendations. She had no personal knowledge of the Claimant's actual deposition testimony and had not had any discussions with any of the employer representatives involved in the termination. 6. The testimony I find the most compelling is that of Keith Johnson, the former Chief Administrator of Vision Quest and the Claimant's supervisor during the events in question. Mr. Johnson was subpoenaed to attend the hearing and only resigned with Vision Quest upon request. If he had not resigned, he testified he would have been terminated. I find that Mr. Johnson was an unbiased witness with nothing to gain by giving testimony positive to his former employer. I accept his testimony that the Claimant was a "below average" employee with questionable behavior. I accept his testimony that he overheard the Claimant yelling at the children calling them "losers" and "delinquents ". Even though discussions with the Claimant Page 8 of 11

9 were not reduced to writing, I accept Mr. Johnson's testimony that he personally told the Claimant that such behavior was not tolerated. Even though Mr. Johnson was not present when the Claimant spoke with Martha at Child Net, I accept his testimony that the Claimant called him personally and they addressed Martha's complaint. I accept his testimony that he told the Claimant that his behavior was inappropriate, disrespectful and not to be tolerated. I find that these conversations between Mr. Johnson and the Claimant were clearly verbal reprimands. I find it disingenuous that the Claimant did not recall these conversations with Mr. Johnson and flat out refused that they even took place. The Claimant testified that both Mr. Iezzi and Mr. Johnson would be lying if they testified as to verbal reprimands. I also find the Claimant's position that if a reprimand was not reduced to writing, it somehow did not take place, to be disingenuous and not credible. I find that the testimony of Mr. Johnson directly contradicts the Claimant's deposition testimony that he has never been reprimanded for unprofessional behavior. (Depo. Page 44 line 5) I find that the testimony of Mr. Johnson directly contradicts the Claimant's deposition testimony that he has never received any employment warnings for unprofessional behavior. I find that the testimony of Mr. Johnson directly contradicts the Claimant's deposition testimony that he has never been reprimanded for past incidents of unprofessional behavior. 7. I find that the Claimant made false, fraudulent or misleading statements in deposition in order to secure workers compensation benefits in direct violation of Florida Statute (4) (b) and Florida Statute (4) when he made the statements deposition, which are in direct contravention of the testimony of Keith Johnson, which I accept as credible and unbiased. At the time the statements were made, the Claimant had already been terminated from Page 9 of 11

10 employment and had a pending claim for payment of injections and temporary partial disability benefits. 8. The Employer /Carrier also defended the indemnity claim under Florida Statute (4)(e) which states that temporary partial disability benefits are not payable if the employee is terminated from post injury employment based on the employee's misconduct. I deny the misconduct defense on the basis that the only testimony regarding the termination was from Mr. lezzi whose testimony I have not accepted. The receipt of unemployment compensation benefits is a factor that I have considered. The Employer did not appeal the finding and the evidence submitted before me does not clearly prove a misconduct defense. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. I find that the Claimant knowingly or intentionally engaged in the acts described in Florida Statute (4)(b)1, 2 and/or Pursuant to Florida Statute (4)(a), the Claimant is not entitled to compensation or benefits under this chapter. 3. The Employer /Carrier's misconduct defense is denied. 4. The Petitions for Benefits filed on January 28, 2016 and February 19, 2016 are denied and dismissed with prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 16 day of September, Mary A. D'Ambrosio Judge of Compensation Claims Division of Administrative Hearings Page 10 of 11

11 Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims West Palm Beach District Office One Clearlake Centre, Suite S. Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida (561) cc.state.fl.us CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Final Compensation Order was entered on the 16 day of September, 2016 and that a copy thereof was electronically served on counsel and mailed the parties. frmc-1-(i Secretary to Judge of Compensation Claims Alan M. Aronson, Esquire com Andrew R. Borah, Esquire aborah@hrmcw.com,sfournier@hrmcw.com Page 11 of 11

held on October 8, Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the

held on October 8, Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Vincent Sansone, Employee /Claimant, vs. Frank Crum/Frank Winston Crum Insurance,

More information

was represented by Kate Albin Esq.

was represented by Kate Albin Esq. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT Cosme D. Calderon, Employee /Claimant, vs. Super Landscape & Maintenance, Inc., and Springs

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE Tracy Miles, Employee /Claimant, vs. Gillette Construction Services /Guarantee Insurance

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Johnathon M. Spain, Employee/Claimant, vs. General Caulking and Coatings,

More information

CASE NO. 1D Bradley Guy Smith, Lakeland, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Bradley Guy Smith, Lakeland, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALAN R. CLARK, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-2886

More information

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Reinel D. Arango, Employee /Claimant, vs. F & E Trucking Corporation /Protective

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT EMPLOYEE: Roberto Tuero 15258 SW 112 Court Miami, Florida 33157 EMPLOYER: Miami Iron & Metal

More information

This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a

This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT Stacey Henry, Employee /Claimant, Vs. Frank Crum/Anthony's Coal Fire Pizza and

More information

FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE Jason Jaggon, Employee /Claimant, VS. Affinity Resources, LLC. /AmTrust North

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Jose Rivera, Employee/Claimant, vs. Howard Leasing, Inc./Sunz Insurance, and Corvel

More information

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Maikel Adrian Rodriguez, Employee /Claimant, vs. USA BOUQUET LLC /AmTrust North America

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Anson Jean -Pierre, Employee /Claimant, vs. Eli Witt Company, Eli Witt Company/United

More information

F:INAL COMPENSATION ORDER

F:INAL COMPENSATION ORDER JESUS GARZA RODRIGUEZ, CLAIMANT, V. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE OJCC#09-003610KAS DATE OF ACCIDENT: 9/26/2008

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC14-2049 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. CYRUS A. BISCHOFF, Respondent. [March 2, 2017] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent, Cyrus

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Gloria J. Verno, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 985 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: January 10, 2014 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE Ralph Velez, Employee/Claimant, vs. City of Zephyrhills, Employer, OJCC Case

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F LARRY BROOKS, Employee. RIVER CITY MATERIALS, INC., Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F LARRY BROOKS, Employee. RIVER CITY MATERIALS, INC., Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F711611 LARRY BROOKS, Employee RIVER CITY MATERIALS, INC., Employer AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, INC., Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE Carlos Borrego, Employee/Claimant, STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE vs. J & K Boring and Welding Services,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR REPORT OF REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR REPORT OF REFEREE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant Supreme Court Case No. SC06-11 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2004-51,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR Respondent / REPORT OF

More information

A hearing was conducted, telephonically, on September 15, 2016 to consider the

A hearing was conducted, telephonically, on September 15, 2016 to consider the STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE Goldie McGhee, Employee /Claimant, vs. ACE Hardware /York Risk Services Group, and

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE Sara Ellis, Employee /Claimant, vs. Florida Institute of Technology

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC08-1210 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos. 2007-50,011(17B) 2007-51,629(17B) JANE MARIE LETWIN, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT

More information

Appellants, CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Shelley M. Punancy.

Appellants, CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Shelley M. Punancy. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA VILLAGE APARTMENTS and PROTEGRITY SERVICES, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellant vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-01389 Referee Decision No. 13-641U Employer/Appellee ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

undersigned reserved jurisdiction to adjudicate a pending Petition for Benefits filed on

undersigned reserved jurisdiction to adjudicate a pending Petition for Benefits filed on STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT Sally Vice, Employee /Claimant, V5. La Place Du Soleil, LLP, Tower Group Companies

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES ISSUES

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES ISSUES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CLEVELAND IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12 DOJ 02778 TIMMY DEAN ADAMS, Petitioner, v. N.C. Department of Justice, Company Police Program Respondent. FINAL DECISION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Kristine Lerie, Petitioner v. No. 1663 C.D. 2016 Submitted March 10, 2017 Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE ROBERT SIMPSON,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Case No. SC TFB No ,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY REPORT OF THE REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Case No. SC TFB No ,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY REPORT OF THE REFEREE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Complainant, v. Case No. SC07-747 TFB No. 2004-11,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT AMENDED FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT AMENDED FINAL MERITS ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT Sally Vice, Employee /Claimant, VS. La Place Du Soleil, LLP and, Tower Group Companies

More information

Courtesy 440Authority.com

Courtesy 440Authority.com STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT Harley Foust, Employee /Claimant, vs. City of Homestead Police Department/Preferred Government

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellant vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-05485 Referee Decision No. 13-43626U Employer/Appellee ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEARANCES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF WAKE 13 OSP 11966 John Charchar, v. Petitioner, N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, Respondent. FINAL DECISION This

More information

An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ARBOR TREE MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a COAST CADILLAC CO., Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT EMPLOYEE: ATTORNEY FOR EMPLOYEE: Maria Salado Richard E. Zaldivar, Esquire 633

More information

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * * Judgment rendered April 11, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * ALVIN

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE Heather Wynne, Employee /Claimant, vs. TGIF /Gallagher Bassett Services,

More information

Effective January 1, 2016

Effective January 1, 2016 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Atanaska Pirintchieva, Employee /Claimant, Vs. Jane E Bistline MD PA /Technology

More information

attorney fees and costs (Petition for Benefits (PFB) #4) (Docket Number (DN) 38) and

attorney fees and costs (Petition for Benefits (PFB) #4) (Docket Number (DN) 38) and STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE Irwin Douglas, Employee /Claimant, vs. Sunryse Construction Services,

More information

OJCC No: GDAL DIA: 06/26/2017 JUDGE: Daniel A. Lewis FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (FEE AMOUNT HEARING)

OJCC No: GDAL DIA: 06/26/2017 JUDGE: Daniel A. Lewis FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (FEE AMOUNT HEARING) STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE EMPLOYEE: Alice Johnson 216 Lake Pointe Drive, Apt #119 Oakland Park, FL 33309

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Guillermo Santiago, Employee /Claimant, vs. Florida Highway Patrol/Division of Risk

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Complainant, Case No. SC07-40 [TFB Case Nos. 2005-11,345(20B); 2006-10,662(20B); 2006-10,965(20B)] KENT ALAN JOHANSON, Respondent.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,618 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. LUKE MICHAEL RICHARDS, Appellant, MEMORANDUM OPINION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,618 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. LUKE MICHAEL RICHARDS, Appellant, MEMORANDUM OPINION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,618 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS LUKE MICHAEL RICHARDS, Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW, CECELIA RESNIK, Executive Secretary,

More information

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions If you have a case pending at the unemployment compensation Appeals Office, you will need to request discovery from your former employer Discovery

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE Sheba T. Davis, Employee/Claimant, STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE vs. Staffing Concepts, Inc./North American

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Sylina McNair, No. 132 C.D. 2013 Petitioner Submitted June 21, 2013 v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE DAN PELLEGRINI, President

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) No. SC Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No ,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) No. SC Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No ,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-1740 Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No. 2005-50,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI Respondent. / REPORT

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District OJCC NO.: 12-005404MGK DATE OF ACCIDENT: 12/6/2011 EMPLOYEE: Ela Gonzalez 4130 West 21st Court,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District EMPLOYEE: Jerman R. Wheeler 5225 Millenia Blvd., #302 Orlando, FL 32839 EMPLOYER: Coastal

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE Katherine MacGill, Employee/Claimant, vs. PsychSoluntions Corp/Comp Options/AmTrust

More information

BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO BEFORE THE POLICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO IN THE MATTER OF CHARGES FILED AGAINST ) POLICE OFFICER VERNAL TURNER, ) No. 11 PB 2760 STAR No. 14916, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, ) CITY OF CHICAGO, ) ) (CR No.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F601032 DONALD WILSON CLAIMANT J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT INSURANCE COMPANY-STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

ORDER ON AWARD OF CLAIMANT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS

ORDER ON AWARD OF CLAIMANT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Malak Wasef, Employee/Claimant, vs. Mitsubishi Electric America, Inc., Employer,

More information

I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives

I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures A. Objectives The fundamental objectives of these CMP Disciplinary Policy and Procedures (hereafter also collectively referred to as Rules ) are to protect the public

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Shannon Cummins, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1944 C.D. 2017 : No. 1945 C.D. 2017 Unemployment Compensation Board : Submitted: December 14, 2018 of Review, : Respondent

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2007

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2007 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F603699 CHRIS KOLLN HANKE BROTHERS AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. CLAIMANT RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CARRIER ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE Darrel Grabner, Employee/Claimant, vs. Office of the Inspector General /Division

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DEMETRIUS L. EDDIE, Defendant. / CASE NO.: 14-CF-015754; 10-CF-010110;

More information

Certiorari not Applied for COUNSEL

Certiorari not Applied for COUNSEL BUSTILLOS V. CONSTRUCTION CONTR., 1993-NMCA-142, 116 N.M. 673, 866 P.2d 401 (Ct. App. 1993) Efrain BUSTILLOS, Claimant-Appellant, vs. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING and CNA Insurance Companies, Respondents-Appellees

More information

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR

BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INSTITUTIONS EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2427, AFSCME, AFL-CIO Case 265 No. 52330 MA-8920 and SHEBOYGAN COUNTY Appearances:

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CELESTE E. KASSING, EMPLOYEE SITTON MOTOR LINES, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CELESTE E. KASSING, EMPLOYEE SITTON MOTOR LINES, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F812234 CELESTE E. KASSING, EMPLOYEE SITTON MOTOR LINES, EMPLOYER CLAIM INDEMNITY SERVICES, LLC, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee. KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee. KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F304082 PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2017

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2017 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2017 The cases listed below will be heard in the Wisconsin Supreme Court Hearing Room, 231 East, State Capitol. This calendar includes cases that

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Christopher Sapp, Employee/Claimant, vs. State of Florida/Division of Risk Management,

More information

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association ARBITRATION RULES 1. Conduct of Hearings. All hearings shall be conducted in accordance with these Rules, and any procedures and forms approved by the Board of Directors. 2. Small Claims. All disputes

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013 RUBY BLACKMON v. EATON ELECTRICAL, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-11-0673-2 Arnold

More information

v. CASE NO. 1D

v. CASE NO. 1D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BONNIE LAUGHLIN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. v.

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Sandra Lee Steinmetz, Petitioner v. No. 1043 C.D. 2012 Unemployment Compensation Submitted October 26, 2012 Board of Review, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE RENÉE

More information

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE 1. Forfeiture of Benefits Standards. a. Any member who is convicted of a specified offense committed prior to retirement, or whose employment is terminated by reason of his

More information

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES Amended and Effective August 5, 2003 Rule 1. Purpose and Administration a. b. c. The purpose of the Minnesota

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT EMPLOYEE: 01ania Collado 13801 S. Biscayne River Dr. Miami, Florida 33161 EMPLOYER: 50 Eggs,

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS FERNAND PAUL AUTERY STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 10-0886 ************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH

More information

IN RE BARNHART, S.Ct. No. 29,379 (Filed October 19, 2005) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FORMAL REPRIMAND.

IN RE BARNHART, S.Ct. No. 29,379 (Filed October 19, 2005) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO FORMAL REPRIMAND. No. 29,379 IN RE BARNHART, S.Ct. No. 29,379 (Filed October 19, 2005) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE Inquiry Nos. 2004-126 & 2005-059 IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES

More information

ESCAMBIA COUNTY FIRE-RESCUE

ESCAMBIA COUNTY FIRE-RESCUE Patrick T Grace, Fire Chief Page 1 of 5 PURPOSE: Personnel that fail to follow established ECFR rules, policies, or guidelines will be subject to disciplinary action. OBJECTIVE: To provide personnel with

More information

Fisher, Jessica v. Middle Tennessee Tanning DBA Sun Tan City

Fisher, Jessica v. Middle Tennessee Tanning DBA Sun Tan City University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 5-18-2015 Fisher, Jessica

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE Thomas McLean, vs. Employee/Claimant, McLane Grocery Distributors, and Employer,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File Nos ,023(17C) ,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File Nos ,023(17C) ,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-1872 v. The Florida Bar File Nos. 2001-51,023(17C) 2003-50,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR., Respondent.

More information

Humphreys, Jerry v. Prestigious Placement, Inc.

Humphreys, Jerry v. Prestigious Placement, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 7-19-2016 Humphreys, Jerry

More information

BY-LAWS OF RENTON COMMUNITY CO-OP A Washington State Nonprofit Corporation

BY-LAWS OF RENTON COMMUNITY CO-OP A Washington State Nonprofit Corporation BY-LAWS OF RENTON COMMUNITY CO-OP A Washington State Nonprofit Corporation ARTICLE I - NAME AND LOCATION...2 Section 1. NAME....2 Section 2. LOCATION....2 ARTICLE II - CHAPTER...2 ARTICLE III - PURPOSE...2

More information

SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the

SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the Circuit Court. It has been compiled through the cooperation of the Judges of

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MICHELLE L. LIVELY, EMPLOYEE EATON CORPORATION, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MICHELLE L. LIVELY, EMPLOYEE EATON CORPORATION, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F602763 MICHELLE L. LIVELY, EMPLOYEE EATON CORPORATION, EMPLOYER OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ANNA STIELER, Employee. ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCT, Employer RESPONDENT #1

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ANNA STIELER, Employee. ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCT, Employer RESPONDENT #1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F612608 ANNA STIELER, Employee CLAIMANT ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PRODUCT, Employer RESPONDENT #1 FIRSTCOMP INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2017-03 (Supersedes Administrative

More information

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION () ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY I. PURPOSE OF THIS POLICY 1) Assuring that members and beneficiaries receive the correct benefits

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE EMPLOYEE: John McCarthy 4191 Ever Hill Road, #414 West Palm Beach, FL 33417

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellant

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellant In the matter of: Claimant/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-04349 Referee Decision No. 13-32348U Employer/Appellant ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

] er s. BARBARA BUCCINI v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

] er s. BARBARA BUCCINI v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BARBARA BUCCINI v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made, effective this] 9 1h day of April 2011, between BARBARA BUCCINI and The School Board

More information

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA W.C.A.B. CASE NOS. (Applicant) vs. (Defendants) MINUTES OF HEARING/APPEARANCE SHEET ORDER AND DECISION ON REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OR OFF CALENDAR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,571(15F) ROBERT BRIAN BAKER, REPORT OF REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,571(15F) ROBERT BRIAN BAKER, REPORT OF REFEREE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2028 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2005-51,571(15F) ROBERT BRIAN BAKER, Respondent. / REPORT OF

More information

FNAL COMPENSATION ORDER

FNAL COMPENSATION ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE Ray Jones, Employee/Claimant, vs. Indian River County Fire Rescue/Johns

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. : Petitioner : : v. : No. 164 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: July 25, 2014 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent

More information

O AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE LAKEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 5.56 ESTABLISHING A LODGING FACILTY LICENSING PROGRAM

O AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE LAKEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 5.56 ESTABLISHING A LODGING FACILTY LICENSING PROGRAM AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE LAKEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 5.56 ESTABLISHING A LODGING FACILTY LICENSING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lakewood desires to address

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No.: SC10-1731 [TFB No. 2011-30,299(09E)(CRE)] IN RE: PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF JAMES ELLIS HENSON, Petitioner. / REPORT OF REFEREE

More information

NCTA Disciplinary Procedure

NCTA Disciplinary Procedure NCTA Disciplinary Procedure The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture (NCTA) Disciplinary Procedure is adapted for NCTA from Article IV: Student Code of Conduct Disciplinary Procedures of the UNL Student

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F307580 TEENA E. McGRIFF, EMPLOYEE ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., EMPLOYER AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PENN.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F907651 EARL BEARD, EMPLOYEE PACE INDUSTRIES, LLC EMPLOYER ZURICH INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION. General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar

HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION. General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar Carlock, Copeland & Stair Speaker: Scott Huray, Partner WHAT IS IT? Spoliation

More information

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 2-20-2018 Jackson, Michael

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F RIVER VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F RIVER VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F802705 SHIRLEY WIDMER RIVER VALLEY HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information