PRACTICAL TIPS FOR YOUR CLIENTS FACING FEDERAL INCARCERATION
|
|
- Maurice McCoy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PRACTICAL TIPS FOR YOUR CLIENTS FACING FEDERAL INCARCERATION David A. Merchant II DISCUSSION OVERVIEW I. Time Computation A. In general B. Good time credit C. Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP) D. Consecutive versus concurrent time II. Security Classification and Designation A. Documents needed for designation FDFCDC 89
2 B. Detainers C. BOP facilities D. Security levels E. Security classification F. Designation FDFCDC 90
3 4/5/2016 Federal Bureau of Prisons David Merchant Assistant Federal Defender Billings, Montana Two Questions - How much time am I going to do? - Where am I going to do my time? Time Computation The BOP is solely responsible for calculating federal imprisonment time. see United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (1992). FDFCDC 91 1
4 4/5/2016 Time Computation Title 18 U.S.C. 3585(a) dictates that [a] sentence to a term of imprisonment commences on the date the defendant is received in custody awaiting transportation to, or arrives voluntarily to commence service of sentence at, the official detention facility at which the sentence is to be served. GET THE DATE ON THE J + C Time Computation Good conduct time is credited at 54 days per year, pro rated, pursuant to PS In reality, the BOP gives your client 47 days per year after the first year s credit. This calculation has been upheld by the US Supreme Court. Barber v. Thomas, 130 S. Ct (2010) Time Computation For Instance On a 60 month sentence, the maximum good time credit is 235 days instead of 270 days On a 120 month sentence, the maximum good time credit is 470 days not 540 days. But it could be less FDFCDC 92 2
5 4/5/2016 Time Computation An inmate who does not have a least a GED is only eligible for a maximum of 42 days of Good Conduct Time per year. Time Computation Your client must have a sentence of one year and a day to qualify for good time. 12 months equals 365 days served. 12 months and a day equals 312 days. Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP) A 500 hour program where inmates are placed in a class that lives together, separated from the general prison population takes 8 to 12 months to complete Inmate must have (1) verifiable drug abuse problem (2) No serious mental health issues (3) within 36 months of release (4) agree to participate (sign agreement) (5) appropriate security level FDFCDC 93 3
6 4/5/2016 Residential Drug & Alcohol Program To qualify for the RDAP program the inmate must have a drug or alcohol problem within the last year (as verified in the PSR) Even then, if the inmate has had any drug or alcohol treatment or counseling, it may preclude them from entry into the program. In-patient counseling, post-conviction and prior to sentencing is used to exclude the inmate from the program. Residential Drug & Alcohol Program The LIE - Legal Instrument Examiner Deducts time served and statutory good time to see if the inmate has enough time to complete the program. So a client who gets a 24 month sentence and has 6 months in jail at the time of sentencing most likely will not get the RDAP program because their time is too short to complete the program. Some Inmates Ineligible for Early Release Under RDAP INS/ICE detainees; Inmates with prior felony or misdemeanor convictions for homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault or child sexual abuse offenses; Inmates whose current offense has an element of physical force, firearm, sexual abuse offenses; FDFCDC 94 4
7 4/5/2016 Some Inmates Ineligible for Early Release Under RDAP Current offense that by it s nature or conduct presents a serious potential risk or physical force against the person or property of another; Offenses for which a guideline enhancement was applied to the offense level for the use or threatened use of force or firearm. Early release is based on successful completion of RDAP In the Ninth Circuit be aware that the BOP complies with Arrington v. Daniels, 516 F. 3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008) and have a written response for inmates. Concurrent versus Consecutive Time The Bureau of Prisons would never know to give a client complete credit they are due because they would never know about previous days of jail time that the client served in state, local or tribal custody on the same matter, if it is not clearly spelled out in the PSR. FDFCDC 95 5
8 4/5/2016 Documents Needed for Designation USM US Marshal form - Gives separations, aliases, gang affiliations. Judgment & Commitment - Gives length of sentence and supervised release, must state concurrent or consecutive sentence (if silent the BOP will treat as consecutive) gives recommendations as to programming and/or facility. PSR -- MOST IMPORTANT for BOP Presentence Report Three versions draft - original revised - attorney revisions JUDGE GETS amended - court revisions after sentencing Most judges will not amend a PSR unless it effects the guideline calculation. This is contrary to both the law and policy as the PSR goes into the matrix for determination of classification, eligibility for programs (employment, RDAP, education), medical treatment, release plans as well as visitation eligibility. PSR Attorneys Be Aware Be aware of medical issues that effect client s ability to function in prison. (must now have documentation - provide it to PSR writer to be included in report) Be aware of any escapes or FTA = could be scored as Crime of Violence Be aware of crimes of violence that did not result in convictions FDFCDC 96 6
9 4/5/2016 PSR Attorneys Be Aware Be aware of any references to homosexuality Be aware of any gang references as well as tattoos listed - confirm with client Be aware that juvenile history (crimes, sexual behavior, educational reports, mental health evaluations) will be used to increase security levels PSR Attorneys Be Aware If client speaks Spanish, RDAP is in offered in the Spanish language at FCI Miami and FPC Montgomery. But -- an ICE detainer will prevent participation. Detainers A detainer will increase client s security level - except for ICE detainers Try to resolve any pending charges as a detainer may also prevent client from the RDAP program as well as halfway house placement. FDFCDC 97 7
10 4/5/2016 Federal Bureau of Prisons Institutions Facilities The BOP consists of 122 institutions, 6 regional offices, a Central Office (headquarters), 2 staff training centers, and 26 community corrections offices. As of April 4, 2016, the BOP housed 196,144 inmates throughout their system. Security Levels Minimum This is where your client wants to be Known as Federal Prison Camps Usually near a larger institution or military base Low staff to inmate ratios Inmates typically work at the larger institution or military base Very low risk of assault or escape. Security Levels Low Fenced facility. BOP programs and work (UNICOR) stressed. FDFCDC 98 8
11 4/5/2016 Security Levels Medium - Significantly more secured than a Low Monitored/controlled movement of inmates Cell housing rather than dormitory. High Security Levels Penitentiaries Highly secured facility Close control of inmates movement and programming Long term incarcerations. Admin Security Levels Facilities that have special missions, i.e. medical, transfers, treatment programs (STOP/SOMP), SMOOTH dangerous/escape-prone inmates, security risks, i.e. death row or terrorists/gang members. FDFCDC 99 9
12 4/5/2016 Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification Policy MEN Minimum: 0-11 points Low: points Medium: points High: 24 or more points WOMEN Minimum: 0-15 points Low: points [no Medium] High 31 or more points William O Hannity 24 year old high school drop out. Detained throughout the proceedings. Convicted of Threatening the President conviction for DUI probation (1 point) 2012 conviction for indecent exposure 1 year jail w/ 300 days deferred (2 points) Security Scoring 1 Voluntary Surrender no (0 points) yes (-3 points) 2 Severity of Current Offense Lowest (0 points) Low Moderate (1point) Moderate (3 points) High (5 points) Greatest (7 points) FDFCDC
13 4/5/2016 Security Scoring 3 Criminal History Score (PSR) 0-1 (0 points) 2-3 (2 points) 4-6 (4 points) 7-9 (4 points) (6 points) 13 + (10 points) 4 Documented History of Violence (minor / serious) None (0 / 0 points) > 15 years (1 / 2 points) years (1 / 4 points) 5 10 years (3 / 6 points) < 5 years (5 / 7 points) Security Scoring 5 History of Escapes / Attempts (minor / serious) None (0 points) > 15 years (1 / 3 points) years (1 / 3 points) 5 10 years (2 / 3 points) < 5 years (3 / 3 points) 6 Existing detainer None (0 points) Lowest/ Low Moderate (1 point) Moderate (3 points) High (5 points) Greatest (7 points) Security Scoring 7 Age 55 years + (0 points) years (2 points) years (4 points) < 25 years (8 points) 8 Education H.S. Grad/GED (0 points) working on GED (1 point) no degree, no work (2 points) 9 Drug / Alcohol Abuse None / > 5 years (0 points) < 5 years (1 point) FDFCDC
14 4/5/2016 Designation Bureau attempts to designate inmates to facilities commensurate with their security and program needs within a 500-mile radius of their release residence If an inmate is placed at an institution that is more than 500 miles from their release residence, generally, it is due to specific security, programming, or population concerns. When an inmate is referred for a re-designation transfer, these same criteria are applied in making a decision for transfer to a new facility. Inmates are designated or re-designated based on: The level of security and staff supervision the inmate requires The level of security and staff supervision the institution provides The medical classification care level of the inmate and the care level of the institution Inmates are designated or re-designated based on: The inmate's program needs (e.g., treatment, educational/vocational training, individual and/or group counseling, medical/mental health treatment), and Various administrative factors (e.g., institution bed space capacity; release residence; judicial recommendations; separation needs; and security measures needed to ensure protection of victims, witnesses, and the general public). FDFCDC
15 4/5/2016 Inmates are designated or re-designated based on: Any request for transfer must originate with an inmate's institution Unit Team at his or her current facility The DSCC evaluates referrals submitted by institution staff and makes decisions based on the information provided by the institution Inmates are encouraged to work closely with members of their institution Unit Team to determine if transfer to a facility closer to their release residence may be possible FDFCDC
16 Federal Bureau of Prisons Website = Time Computation The BOP is solely responsible for calculating federal terms of imprisonment. See United States v.wilson, 503 U.S. 329 (1992). 18 U.S.C. 3585(a) dictates that [a] sentence to a term of imprisonment commences on the date the defendant is received in custody awaiting transportation to, or arrives voluntarily to commence service of sentence at, the official detention facility at which the sentence is to be served. Barber v. Thomas, 130 S. Ct (2010), held that the calculation method used by the Bureau of Prisons to determine the amount of "good time" earned on federal criminal sentences is lawful. [A] prisoner who is serving a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year other than a term of imprisonment for the duration of the prisoner's life, may receive credit toward the service of the prisoner's sentence, beyond the time served, of up to 54 days at the end of each year of the prisoner's term of imprisonment, beginning at the end of the first year of the term, subject to determination by the Bureau of Prisons that, during that year, the prisoner has displayed exemplary compliance with institutional disciplinary regulations....[c]redit for the last year or portion of a year of the term of imprisonment shall be prorated and credited within the last six weeks of the sentence. The BOP's method, which the Court upheld, interprets "term of imprisonment" in the statute to mean entire imposed sentence" in some places, but "time actually served" when calculating good time. The BOP sets earned time aside at the end of each 365-day period. When the time remaining in a sentence minus earned time equals less than one year, the BOP applies a 54/365 ratio to prorate that last year and determine the prisoner's release date. 18 U.S.C. 3624(b)(1) Good conduct time is credited at 54 days per year, pro rated, pursuant to PS In reality, the BOP gives your client 47 days per year after the first year s credit. So while the statute calls for an inmate to serve 85% of the sentence imposed, the BOP credit s the amount of time actually served. So, the BOP makes the inmate serve approximately 87.5% of their time. For instance, on a 60 month sentence, the maximum good time credit is 235 days instead of 270 days and on a 120 month sentence, the maximum good time credit is 470 days not 540 days. Your client must have (1) either a GED, High School diploma or better, or be working towards one, and (2) a sentence of one year and a day, to qualify for the maximum allowable good time. So 12 months equals 365 days served, 12 months and a day equals 312 days (366 days - 54 days). 1 FDFCDC 104
17 REMEMBER - A client who does not have at least a GED is only eligible for a maximum of 42 days of Good Conduct Time per year. Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP) - a 500 hour program where inmates are placed in a class that lives together, separated from the general prison population. - takes six to twelve months to complete. - inmate must have (1) verifiable drug abuse problem (2) No serious mental health issues (3) within 36 months of release (4) agree to participate (sign agreement) (5) appropriate security level - inmate cannot have a crime of violence. Early release based on successful completion of RDAP 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 227(d), an inmate who is sentenced for a non-violent offense, has a substance abuse problem and successfully completes a residential drug abuse treatment program, may qualify for an early release not to exceed twelve (12) months. 2. Inmates who are not eligible for early release. (see 18 U.S.C. 3621(e)(5)(B) and 28 C.F.R (2000)): a. INS/ICE detainees; b. Inmates with prior felony or misdemeanor convictions for homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, arson, kidnapping or child sexual abuse offenses; c. Inmates whose current offense has an element of physical force, carry, possession of a firearm, sexual abuse offenses; d. Current offense that by it s nature or conduct present a serious potential risk or physical force against the person or property of another; e. Offenses for which a guideline enhancement was applied to the offense level for the use or threatened use of force or firearm. 2 FDFCDC 105
18 *** In the Ninth Circuit be aware that the BOP complies with Arrington v. Daniels, 516 F. 3d 1106 (9 th Cir. 2008) and they have a written response for inmates who are both in and out of circuit. The BOP has actually changed their policy because of Arrington and every Circuit but the Ninth have held against the holding. See Bellreng v. Grondolsky, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (D NJ, Dec. 11, 2009); Fletcher v. Johns, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (D NC, July 22, 2011). The Ninth Circuit has reversed BOP decisions regarding some crimes of violence that would prevent early release (Abbott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 771 F. 3d 512 (9 th Cir. 2014) as well as uphold BOP decisions (Peck v. Thomas, 697 F. 3d 767 (9 th Cir. 2012)). Concurrent Versus Consecutive Time 18 U.S.C governs the amount of jail time credited to a federally sentenced inmate. Defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment time he has spent in office detention prior to the date the sentence commences - - (1) as a result of the offense for which the sentence was imposed... that has not been credited against another sentence. 18 U.S.C. 3585(b). (Emphases added) While the Attorney General through the Bureau of Prisons possesses the sole authority to make credit determinations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3585(b) [United States v. Whaley 148 F. 3d 205 (2 nd Cir. 1998)], circuit courts have held that district courts have concurrent authority to grant credit for time served in official detention. Based on the deletion of all references to Attorney General in 3585 manifested congressional intent to withdraw the Attorney General s exclusive authority. See United States v. Beston, 936 F. 3d 361 (8 th Cir. 1991) rehearing denied 1991 US App LEXIS With that said, the Bureau of Prisons would never know to give a client the complete credit he is due because they would never know about the previous jail time that the client served in state custody on the same matter. Circuit courts have held that under 18 U.S.C. 3585(b), a defendant shall be given credit toward his term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences. See United States v. Becak, 954 F. 2d 386 (6 th Cir. 1992). Although a district court can not order that a federal sentence begin when a defendant was arrested by the state for the same conduct underlying the federal offense. The Ninth Circuit has recently affirmed the BOP s denial of jail credit for a federal inmate who had previously served state time for a related charge. See United States v. Schleining, 9 th Cir. No.: , June 27, 2011) Because the BOP determines jail credit, the district court may accomplish the same end by departing downward in it s federal sentence. The proper way to ensure that Gonzalez served a total of 156 months would have been for the court to increase the downward departure it granted him and sentence him to 129 months. United States v. Gonzalez, 192 F. 3d 350 (2 nd Cir. 1999). A District Court has the authority under U.S.S.G. 5G1.3 (c) to adjust a federal sentence for time served on 3 FDFCDC 106
19 a state sentence in a way that is binding on the BOP, whether it is called a departure, a credit or an adjustment. See Ruggiano v. Reish, 307 F. 3d 121 (3 rd Cir. 2002). In United States v. Pray, 373 F.3d 358 (3 rd Cir. 2004), the defendant served 4 months in state time custody for a drug offense and was later convicted on related federal drug offense district court may depart downward on federal sentence to credit defendant with state time, which was completed (and therefore not undischarged in accordance with U.S.S.G. 5G1.3). Likewise, a district court could not credit defendant in his federal case with the time he had served in his state case, in accordance with 5G1.3, but could accomplish the same result with a departure. See United States v. Rosado, 254 F. Supp. 2d 316 (SDNY 2003) where defendant was convicted of distributing heroin, and where defendant had served 7 months in state custody on the conviction that was relevant conduct in the federal sentence, defendant was granted a 7 month downward departure to account of state time already served through a departure. A district court in the Northern District of New York held that the BOP improperly denied good time credit for the period of the federal sentence served concurrently with the state sentence. [(See Hill v. Corwin (ND NY 9:10-cv-553, June 9, 2010)]. 4 FDFCDC 107
20 Facilities The BOP consists of 122 institutions, 6 regional offices, a Central Office (headquarters), 2 staff training centers, and 26 community corrections offices as well as 14 privately operated facilities. In 2010 there were 115 institutions. As of January 15, 2015, there are 196,343 total federal inmates. Compared to August 20, 2015 (pre drugs minus 2 releases) there were 206,860 inmates. Compared to May 22, 2014, there were 217,180 inmates and March 3, 2011, when the BOP housed 210, 039 inmates. 5 security levels Minimum - Low - Medium - High - Admin - Also called Federal Prison Camps. Usually near a larger institution or military base. Low staff to inmate ratios. Inmates typically work at the larger institution or military base. Very low risk of assault or escape. Fenced facility. BOP programs and work (UNICOR) stressed. Dorm or cubical housing. Significantly more secured than a Low. Monitored/controlled movement of inmates. Cell housing rather than dormitory. Penitentiaries. Highly secured facility. Close control of inmates movement and programing. Long term incarcerations. Facilities that have special missions, i.e. medical, transfers, treatment programs (STOP), dangerous/escape-prone inmates, security risks, i.e. death row or terrorists/gang members. *** Keep in mind that there are no female medium facilities 5 FDFCDC 108
21 Inmate Classification and BOP Designation All designations and time computations now take place at the Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) in Grand Prairie, Texas. See Program Statement Prisoners are classified by the BOP according to procedures set forth in Program Statement P See U.S. Dep t of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement P (Sept. 2006). All biographical data for a particular prisoner is entered into the BOP SENTRY system. This results in a security score based on the individual s characteristics. This score determines the minimum security level permitted. The Bureau attempts to designate inmates to facilities commensurate with their security and program needs within a 500-mile radius of their release residence. If an inmate is placed at an institution that is more than 500 miles from their release residence, generally, it is due to specific security, programming, or population concerns such as a separation order. When an inmate is referred for a re-designation transfer, these same criteria are apply in making a decision for transfer to a new facility. The placement authorized by the security score may be overridden, to the benefit or detriment of the individual prisoner, by variables known as Public Safety Factors or Management Variables. A custody level is also assigned to each inmate within any given security level institution. SECURITY SCORING The BOP uses the Presentence Investigation Report, the Judgment and Commitment Order including the Statement of Reasons, a United States Marshall report (USM 129) and any information available to the BOP from the Central Inmate Monitoring system (CIM). The categories for the Security Designation scoring are: (1) Voluntary Surrender? No (0 points) Yes (-3 points) (2) Severity of Current Offense? Lowest (0 points) Low Moderate (1 point) Moderate (3 points) High (5 points) Greatest (7 points) (3) Criminal History Score in PSR? 0-1 (0 points) 2-3 (2 points) 4-6 (4 points) 7-9 (6 points) (8 points) 13+ (10 points) 6 FDFCDC 109
22 (4) Documented History of Violence None (0 points/0 points) (minor/serious)? >15 years (1 point/2 points) years (1point/4 points) 5-10 years (3 points/6 points) <5 years (5 points/7 points) (5) History of Escapes/Attempts? None (0 points/0 points) (minor/serious)? >15 years (1 point/3 points) years (1 point/3 points) 5-10 years (2 points/3 points) < 5 years (3 points/3 points) (6) Existing detainer? None (0 points) Lowest/Low Moderate (1 point) Moderate (3 points) High (5 points) Greatest (7 points) (7) Age? 55 + (0 points) (2 points) (4 points) < 25 (8 points) (8) Education Level? High School Graduate/GED (0 points) Progress on GED (1 point) No Degree/Not Progressing (2 points) (9) Drug/Alcohol Abuse? None / >5 years (0 points) <5 years (1 point) The total of points assigned in these categories is the security score used for purposes of designation. Security Custody Men Women Level Level Minimum Community/Out 0-11 points 0-15 points Low Out / In points points Medium Out / In points no women s medium High In and Max. 24 or more points 31 or more points 7 FDFCDC 110
23 Practical Tips for each Category 1. The only way to reduce security points is to voluntarily surrender. If your client is close in points, argue to the Judge how significantly this can impact your client. This item allows for the subtraction of three points from the Security Point Total when the Judgment indicates the inmate was allowed to voluntarily surrender. For purposes of this item, voluntary surrender means the inmate was not escorted by a law enforcement officer to either the U.S. Marshals Office or the place of confinement. Additionally, this item applies only to post-sentencing voluntary surrender, and does not include cases where the inmate surrendered to the U.S. Marshals on the same day as sentencing. Voluntary Surrender Credit may only be applied to the initial term of confinement; it may not be applied to any subsequent Supervised Release, Mandatory Release or parole Violation return to custody. P chapter 4, page 6, September 12, The severity of the offense values are based on the Offense Severity Scale found in the BOP Policy Statement The points are assessed reflecting the most severe (documented) behavior regardless of the conviction. This information is taken from the PSR. Do your best to remove language regarding such behavior from the PSR if it is not properly documented. 3. The BOP takes the Criminal History Score from the Judgment first, then the PSR. If it is not listed in the Judgment or the PSR then the BOP may calculate this score on their own. It is imperative that you do not let the BOP designator score this on their own as they use the Criminal History section of the PSR as well as information from the LEIN, EPIC, CCH and other PSR s. There is significant room for double counting and for scoring multiple convictions as multiple points. 4. Under History of Violence, the severity of the act of violence is assessed by the underlying conduct, not by the finding or conviction. Make sure you fight to remove any behavior that is not properly documented. 5. Escapes are graded as minor when they involve minimal security and no violence or threat of violence, ie. walking away from a halfway house or work program. All of the Circuits have found that a walkaway escape does not constitute a violent felony or a crime of violence. See United States v. Ford, 560 F. 3d 420 (6 th Cir. 2009); United States v. Hart, 578 F. 3d 674 (7 th Cir. 2009); United States v. Jackson, 594 F. 3d 1027 (8 th Cir. 2010); and, United States v. Lee, 586 F. 3d 859 (11 th Cir. 2009). Escapes are serious if they occur from a higher security or have any violence or threat of violence. 8 FDFCDC 111
24 6. If there is a pending charge, points are added under the Detainer category based on the documented behavior. No points are added for ICE detainers. 7. The age of the client is now a factor, weighting against younger inmates. If the inmates age is unknown, a default score of 4 will be given. If the client is near a birthday that would change the category, I ask for a continuance of the sentencing hearing. 8. The Education Level requires that the inmate s education level be verified. Provide documentation to the probation officer if necessary. Every jail has GED books, but for verification, you must have your client take (not necessarily pass) at least one of the exams. 9. Client s disclosure to the PSR writer should suffice for this variable. Public Safety Factors (PSF) 1. Sentence Length (males only): Unless waived, a inmate with 10 years remaining on their sentence will be housed in a Low security institution. 20 years remaining will be housed in a Medium security facility and 30 years remaining in a High security facility. 2. Disruptive Group (males only): Any inmate who has been confirmed to be a member of a disruptive group (as identified by the BOP) shall be housed in a high security facility. 3. Greatest severity offenses (males only): Conviction for; aircraft piracy, arson, assault, car jacking, serious drug offenses, escape, espionage, explosives, homicide, robbery, sexual offenses, exporting sophisticated weaponry, threatening a governmental official. 4. Sex Offender: If the PSR or another official document clearly indicates behavior that is characterized as a sex offense, inmate can not receive a designation to a minimum security institution unless PSR is waived. 5. Threat to Government Official: Inmate can not receive a designation to a minimum security institution unless PSR is waived. 6. Deportable alien. 7. Violent behavior (females only): Inmate who has 2 prior convictions (or DHO actions for serious incidents of violence) within the last 5 years. Will be assigned to Carswell Admin Unit, unless waived. 8. Serious Escape: A female will be assigned to the Carswell Admin Unit. Males will receive at least a Medium security level designation. 9 FDFCDC 112
25 9. Juvenile violence: Must be documented behavior (not necessarily involving a conviction.) 10. Serious Telephone Abuse: If a telephone was used to facilitate a crime (drug trafficking, threats, acts of violence), the inmate will be assigned at least a Low security level designation. 11. Prison disturbance: A male inmate will be housed in a High security facility. A female will be housed at the Carswell Admin Unit. Waiver of Public Safety Factor An inmate may receive up to three PSF s. PSF s maybe waived after review and approval of the DSCC Administrator. When a PSF is waived causing a placement outside the normal guideline range, the DSCC Administrator will then determine the most appropriate security level for the inmate. Only the DSCC Administrator is authorized to waive a PSF. A request for the waiver of the PSF must be submitted to the DSCC on Form 409 (which can be found on the BOP website.) BOP Terms and Acronyms BOP = CCC = CCM = CIM = CSC = DHO = FCC = FCI = FMC = FPC = LSCI = MFCI = MINT = PSF = PSR/PSI = RDAP = RRC = SHU = SMU= SOTP = SOMP = UNICOR = USP = Bureau of Prisons Community Correction Center Community Correction Management (the office which manages RRC s, CSC s and CCC s) Central Inmate Monitoring Community Sanction Center Disciplinary Hearing Officer Federal Correctional Complex Federal Correctional Institution Federal Medical Center Federal Prison Camp Low Security Correctional Institution Medium Federal Correctional Institution Mothers Infants Nurturing Together Public Safety Factor Presentence Investigation Report Residential Drug Abuse Program Residential Reentry Center Special Housing Unit (pronounced like shoe ) (typically disciplinary solitary confinement) Special Management Unit (pronounced like smooth ) (strict visitation and communication policy) Sex Offender Treatment Program Sex Offender Management Program Prison Industry United States Penitentiary 10 FDFCDC 113
26 U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement OPI: CPD/ISM NUMBER: P DATE: 3/31/2006 SUBJECT: Good Conduct Time Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act RULES EFFECTIVE: 12/5/ PURPOSE AND SCOPE. To implement provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) for awarding good conduct time (GCT). 2. SUMMARY OF CHANGES. This Program Statement has been revised, based on 28 CFR , to exempt aliens subject to a final order of removal, deportation, or exclusion from the satisfactory progress in a literacy program provision of the PLRA. 3. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE. The expected result of this program is: Good conduct time for inmates sentenced under the PLRA will be awarded in accordance with Title 18, U.S.C. 3624(b)(4) and 28 CFR DIRECTIVES AFFECTED a. Directive Rescinded P Good Conduct Time Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (9/29/97) b. Directives Referenced P Institution Hearing Program (IHP) (4/23/97) P Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units (12/29/87) P Literacy Program (GED Standard) (12/1/03) P Escapes/Deaths Notification (8/23/99) P Sentence Computation Manual (CCCA of 1984) (2/21/92) [Bracketed Bold- Rules] Regular Type - Implementing Information FDFCDC 114
27 P /31/2006 Page 2 c. The rule cited in the Program Statement is contained in 28 CFR STANDARDS REFERENCED th a. American Correctional Association 4 Edition Standards for Adult Correctional Institution: rd b. American Correctional Association 3 Edition Standards for Adult Local Detention Facilities: 3-ALDF-1E-03 nd c. American Correctional Association 2 Edition Standards for Administration of Correctional Agencies: 2-CO-1E [GOOD CONDUCT TIME a. For inmates serving a sentence for offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987, but before September 13, 1994, the Bureau will award 54 days credit toward service of sentence (good conduct time credit) for each year served. This amount is prorated when the time served by the inmate for the sentence during the year is less than a full year. b. For inmates serving a sentence for offenses committed on or after September 13, 1994, but before April 26, 1996, all yearly awards of good conduct time will vest for inmates who have earned, or are making satisfactory progress (see Sec (b) of this chapter) toward earning a General Educational Development (GED) credential. c. For inmates serving a sentence for an offense committed on or after April 26, 1996, the Bureau will award (1) 54 days credit for each year served (prorated when the time served by the inmate for the sentence during the year is less than a full year) if the inmate has earned or is making satisfactory progress toward earning a GED credential or high school diploma; or (2) 42 days credit for each year served (prorated when the time served by the inmate for the sentence during the year is less than a full year) if the inmate has not earned or is not making satisfactory progress toward earning a GED credential or high school diploma. FDFCDC 115
28 P /31/2006 Page 3 d. Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an alien who is subject to a final order of removal, deportation, or exclusion is eligible for, but is not required to, participate in a literacy program, or to be making satisfactory progress toward earning a General Educational Development (GED) credential, to be eligible for a yearly award of good conduct time. e. The amount of good conduct time awarded for the year is also subject to disciplinary disallowance (see tables 3 through 6 in Sec of this chapter). 28 CFR refers to the Program Statement on Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units. 7. AWARDING GCT a. Pursuant to the PLRA, in awarding GCT credit, the Education Department at each institution must consider whether the inmate, during the relevant period, has earned, or is making satisfactory progress toward earning, a high school diploma or equivalent degree. See 28 CFR (b) in the Program Statement on Literacy Program (GED Standard). Once a determination has been made, the department enters the appropriate Education Information (EDI) assignment into SENTRY for each inmate. b. This rule provides that an inmate subject to the PLRA is to earn up to the full 54 days credit for GCT (prorated for a partial year at the end of the sentence) if the inmate has earned or is making satisfactory progress toward earning a GED credential. c. The rule further provides that an inmate subject to the PLRA is to earn up to 42 days credit for GCT per year (prorated for a partial year at the end of the sentence) if the inmate has not earned or is not making satisfactory progress toward earning a GED credential, unless, the inmate alien is subject to a final order of removal, deportation, or exclusion. d. If an inmate s status changes from GED UNSAT (unsatisfactory progress) to GED SAT (satisfactory progress), the annual rate of GCT will return to 54 days. Inmate Systems Management (ISM) staff must recalculate (RPC) the sentence computation to affect change. FDFCDC 116
29 P /31/2006 Page 4 e. An inmate alien subject to a final order of removal, deportation, or exclusion will earn GCT at the annual rate of 54 days (prorated for a partial year at the end of the sentence). After completion of the deportation hearing, the Case Manager or designee will enter the Case Management Activity (CMA) assignment into SENTRY and forward a copy of the order to ISM staff for inclusion in the Judgment and Commitment (J&C) file. ISM staff must recalculate the sentence computation. SENTRY will automatically change the annual GCT rate from 42 days to 54 days. f. The amount of GCT earned is subject to disciplinary forfeiture or disallowance. /s/ Harley G. Lappin Director FDFCDC 117
30 FDFCDC 118
31 FDFCDC 119
32 FDFCDC 120
33 FDFCDC 121
34 FDFCDC 122
35 FDFCDC 123
36 FDFCDC 124
37 FDFCDC 125
38 FDFCDC 126
39 FDFCDC 127
40 FDFCDC 128
41 FDFCDC 129
42 FDFCDC 130
43 FDFCDC 131
44 FDFCDC 132
45 FDFCDC 133
46 FDFCDC 134
47 FDFCDC 135
48 FDFCDC 136
49 FDFCDC 137
50 FDFCDC 138
51 FDFCDC 139
52 FDFCDC 140
53 FDFCDC 141
54 FDFCDC 142
55 FDFCDC 143
56 FDFCDC 144
PRACTICAL INFORMATION IF YOUR CLIENT FACES INCARCERATION
PRACTICAL INFORMATION IF YOUR CLIENT FACES INCARCERATION IN A FEDERAL PRISON I. INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is charged with implementing the sentences imposed on federal offenders by the federal
More informationCUSTODY CLASSIFICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS (BP-338)
Chapter 6, Page 1 CUSTODY CLASSIFICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS (BP-338) INTRODUCTION. Custody classification is a procedure whereby an inmate is assigned a level of supervision according to their criminal
More informationThe Bureau of Prisons And Sentence Computations
The Bureau of Prisons And Sentence Computations 2018 Introduction 2 Walt Pavlo Jack Donson Panagiotis Pete" Dedes OIG Report on Untimely Releases 3 Department of Justice, OIG Report. May 2016 - Review
More informationINMATE LOAD AND SECURITY DESIGNATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS (BP-337) INMATE LOAD DATA
Chapter 4, Page 1 INMATE LOAD AND SECURITY DESIGNATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS (BP-337) INMATE LOAD DATA The Inmate Load Data section (Items 1 to 25) of the Inmate Load and Security Designation form (BP-337)
More informationU.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement OPI: CPD NUMBER: 5160.05 DATE: SUBJECT: Designation of State Institution for Service of Federal Sentence 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. To
More informationMale Initial Custody Assessment Procedures
Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures... 1 I. Completing the Initial Custody Assessment Facility Assignment Form... 1 A. Identification... 1 B. Custody Evaluation... 2 C. Scale Summary and Recommendations..
More informationResources Avoiding dual sovereignty screw ups: Highlight BOP policies impacting clients in which lawyer can play a role:
Resources Avoiding dual sovereignty screw ups: Concurrent/consecutive sentences Jail credits Highlight BOP policies impacting clients in which lawyer can play a role: Classification and designation; Treatment
More informationDESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-7-1 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 POLICY. FORCED RELEASES It is the policy of the Deschutes County Adult Jail (DCAJ) and Work Center
More informationU.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement OPI: CPD/CPB NUMBER: DATE: SUBJECT: Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. This Program Statement
More informationDepartment of Corrections
Agency 44 Department of Corrections Articles 44-5. INMATE MANAGEMENT. 44-6. GOOD TIME CREDITS AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION. 44-9. PAROLE, POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION, AND HOUSE ARREST. 44-11. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS.
More informationGlossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms
Please see the Commission s Sentencing Guidelines Implementation Manual for additional detailed information. Concurrent or Consecutive Sentences When more than one sentence is imposed, or when a sentence
More informationInformation Memorandum 98-11*
Wisconsin Legislative Council Staff June 24, 1998 Information Memorandum 98-11* NEW LAW RELATING TO TRUTH IN SENTENCING: SENTENCE STRUCTURE FOR FELONY OFFENSES, EXTENDED SUPERVISION, CRIMINAL PENALTIES
More informationDESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-5-8 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 POLICY. TIME COMPUTATION It is the policy of the Deschutes County Corrections Division to ensure
More informationThere is a 97 percent likelihood that your federal criminal
Securing a favorable federal prison placement There is a 97 percent likelihood that your federal criminal client is going to wind up in front of a sentencing judge. There is also an 80 percent likelihood
More informationAssembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation
Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to offenders; revising provisions relating to the residential confinement of certain offenders; authorizing
More informationPRISON REFORM AND REDEMPTION ACT 115 TH CONGRESS H.R (Collins)
PRISON REFORM AND REDEMPTION ACT 115 TH CONGRESS H.R. 3356 (Collins) STATUS: H.R. 3356 is a bipartisan bill pending in Congress. It is not a law. We do not know if or when it could become law. To become
More informationAssembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation
Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to criminal offenders; revising provisions relating to certain allowable deductions from the period of probation
More informationCircuit Court for Somerset County Case No. 19-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Somerset County Case No. 19-C-14-017042 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 172 September Term, 2017 SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
More informationTHE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Oklahoma Department of Corrections 3400 Martin Luther
More informationSummary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018)
Summary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018) FAMM s position on the First Step Act: FAMM supports the First Step Act. While the bill is not perfect, it will bring much-needed reform to federal
More informationCERTIFICATION PROCEEDING
CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING PURPOSE: TO ALLOW A JUVENILE COURT TO WAIVE ITS EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER A JUVENILE TO ADULT CRIMINAL COURT BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE ALLEGED
More informationU. S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons LEGAL RESOURCE GUIDE TO THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
U. S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons LEGAL RESOURCE GUIDE TO THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 2002 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... - 1 - A. The Bureau's Mission... - 1 - B. This Publication...
More information42 Pa.C.S. 9729, 9763, 9773 and Chapter 98.
303.12 Guideline sentence recommendations: Sentencing programs. Pennsylvania Statutes 42 Pa.C.S. JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Part VIII CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Chapter 97 SENTENCING Subchapter C SENTENCING
More informationJurisdiction Profile: North Carolina
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The North Carolina
More informationSentencing Chronic Offenders
2 Sentencing Chronic Offenders SUMMARY Generally, the sanctions received by a convicted felon increase with the severity of the crime committed and the offender s criminal history. But because Minnesota
More informationHOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB00 Criminal justice reform. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL for AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions relating to sentencing,
More informationMISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018 By: Representative DeLano To: Corrections HOUSE BILL NO. 232 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THAT AN INMATE BE GIVEN NOTIFICATION OF 2 CERTAIN TERMS UPON HIS OR HER RELEASE
More informationMISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017 By: Representative DeLano To: Corrections HOUSE BILL NO. 35 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THAT AN INMATE BE GIVEN NOTIFICATION OF 2 CERTAIN TERMS UPON HIS OR HER RELEASE
More informationHome Confinement under the First Step Act
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons O P E R A T I O N S M E M O R A N D U M OPI: RSD/RRM NUMBER: 001-2019 DATE: April 4, 2019 EXPIRATION DATE: April 4, 2020 Home Confinement under the
More informationSession of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice 1-18
Session of 0 HOUSE BILL No. 00 By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice - 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to sentencing; possession of a controlled substance;
More informationEarned credit for productive program participation.
ACTION: Final DATE: 11/21/2011 12:25 PM 5120-2-06 Earned credit for productive program participation. (A) Except as provided in paragraphs (P)(S), (Q)(T), (R)(U), (S)(V), (T)(W), (U)(X) and (V)(Y) of this
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: MARCH 12, 2015
SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO SENATE, No. 2003 with committee amendments STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: MARCH 12, 2015 The Senate Law and Public Safety Committee reports without recommendation
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
More informationPART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by
5C1.1 PART C IMPRISONMENT 5C1.1. Imposition of a Term of Imprisonment (a) A sentence conforms with the guidelines for imprisonment if it is within the minimum and maximum terms of the applicable guideline
More informationColorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Distributed to CCJJ, November 9, 2017 Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 leg.colorado.gov/lcs E-mail: lcs.ga@state.co.us
More informationFlorida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn
By Senator Lynn 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to the sentencing of youthful 3 offenders; amending s. 958.04, F.S.; 4 prohibiting the court from sentencing a person 5 as a youthful offender
More informationSuperior Court of Washington For Pierce County
Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County State of Washington, Plaintiff vs.. Defendant No. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty to Sex Offense (STTDFG) 1. My true name is:. 2. My age is:. 3.
More informationTitle 204. Judicial System General Provisions Part VIII Criminal Sentencing Chapter 303. Sentencing Guidelines
Title 204. Judicial System General Provisions Part VIII Criminal Sentencing Chapter 303. Sentencing Guidelines 303.1. Sentencing guidelines standards. (a) The court shall consider the sentencing guidelines
More informationOffice Of The District Attorney
SHANNON G. WALLACE District Attorney Office Of The District Attorney BLUE RIDGE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Cherokee County Justice Center 90 North Street, Suite 390 Canton, Georgia 30114 Phone 770-479-1488 Fax 770-479-3105
More informationll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION
ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION A. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form, or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Arkansas Sentencing
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Alabama
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Alabama Legislature
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Arkansas
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Arkansas Sentencing
More informationBail: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law
Bail: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law July 31, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40222 Summary This is an overview
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Washington, D.C.
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The District of Columbia
More informationPAROLE MATTERS I. BASIC PAROLE ELIGIBILITY II. GAP TIME III. PAROLE REVOCATION/JAIL CREDIT
PAROLE MATTERS I. BASIC PAROLE ELIGIBILITY II. GAP TIME III. PAROLE REVOCATION/JAIL CREDIT February, 2002 I. PAROLE ELIGIBILITY BASIC CALCULATIONS GLOSSARY Actual parole eligibility date is the date that
More informationSummary: H.R. 5682, FIRST STEP Act (115th Congress, 2018) Sponsors: Representatives Doug Collins (R-GA) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)
Summary: H.R. 5682, FIRST STEP Act (115th Congress, 2018) Sponsors: Representatives Doug Collins (R-GA) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) FAMM s position on H.R. 5682: FAMM supports the FIRST STEP Act but also
More informationRULE PROPOSALS INTERESTED PERSONS
RULE PROPOSALS INTERESTED PERSONS The Department of Corrections provides notices of rule proposals in the New Jersey Register (N.J.R.), a semi-monthly official publication of the Office of Administrative
More informationTimmy Mills v. Francisco Quintana
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-10-2010 Timmy Mills v. Francisco Quintana Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-3004 Follow
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228
CHAPTER 2016-7 Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228 An act relating to the mandatory minimum sentences; amending s. 775.087, F.S.; deleting aggravated assault from the list of convictions which
More informationSENATE BILL No. 54. December 5, 2016
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 10, 2017 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 19, 2017 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 29, 2017 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 6, 2017 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 1, 2017
More informationGEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures
Policy Number: 215.01 Effective Date: 01/01/2014 Page Number 1 of 10 I. Introduction and Summary: The selection for offender placement at a Transitional Center to include work release and long-term maintenance
More informationll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION
ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form, or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Commission was
More informationImmigration Violations
Policy 428 428.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE - CONFORMANCE TO SB54 AND RELATED LAWS The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines with the California Values Act, and related statutes, concerning responsibilities
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Federal Good Time Credit
Frequently Asked Questions: Federal Good Time Credit Q1: What is good time credit? A: Good time credit is earned for good behavior described in law as exemplary compliance with institutional disciplinary
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator RAYMOND J. LESNIAK District 0 (Union) SYNOPSIS Transfers Division of Release employees to
More informationVentura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services
Ventura County Probation Agency Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services JDAI is being replicated in 200 jurisdictions in 39 states and the District of Columbia. Juvenile Detention
More informationWHAT IS OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION? GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION
WHAT IS OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION? A formal process for separating and managing inmates and administering facilities based upon agency mission, classification goals, agency resources and inmate program
More informationMARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)
MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO 05-24 6/11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6 Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation) POLICY No person shall be contacted, detained, or arrested
More informationAMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 07-98-48-03 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
More informationAN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:
(131st General Assembly) (Amended Substitute Senate Bill Number 97) AN ACT To amend sections 2152.17, 2901.08, 2923.14, 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.20, 2929.201, 2941.141, 2941.144, 2941.145, 2941.146, and
More informationJUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS 25, 2008, P.L.
JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Sep. 25, 2008, P.L. 1026, No. 81 Cl. 42 Session of 2008 No. 2008-81 HB 4 AN ACT Amending Titles
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-1446 AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.704 AND 3.992 (CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT CODE) [September 26, 2001] PER CURIAM. The Committee on Rules to Implement
More information2016 Sentencing Guidelines Modifications EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2016
2016 Sentencing Guidelines Modifications EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2016 Where to Begin Always start with the Guidelines in effect when the current offense occurred. Guidelines are in effect for offenses committed
More informationCounty Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet
County Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff 1. IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT What is the Sheriff s Office contract
More informationJuvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7
Juvenile Proceedings Scripts - Table of Contents Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION
More informationDeterminate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015
Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015 There are 17 states and the District of Columbia that operate a primarily determinate sentencing system. Determinate sentencing is characterized by
More informationCounty of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney
County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney 65137 A DATE: November 7, 2012 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Supervisors Jeffrey F. Rosen, District Attorney Civil Detainer Policy Review RECOMMENDED
More informationDamien Donahue v. J. Grondolsky
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-13-2010 Damien Donahue v. J. Grondolsky Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-1147 Follow
More informationMISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING
MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING 1. Determine the offense class 2. Determine the offender s prior conviction level 3. Select a sentence length 4. Select
More informationTHE INS AND OUTS OF TYC INTAKE, PROCESSING, LENGTHS OF STAY, AND RELEASE DECISIONS NUTS AND BOLTS OF JUVENILE LAW JULY 2010
THE INS AND OUTS OF TYC INTAKE, PROCESSING, LENGTHS OF STAY, AND RELEASE DECISIONS NUTS AND BOLTS OF JUVENILE LAW JULY 2010 Karen Kennedy Kaci Sohrt Director Release Review Panel Chief Administrative Law
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Minnesota
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. A. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Commission
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES Where to find the Guidelines ONLINE at www.ussc.gov/guidelines In print from Westlaw Chapter Organization Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Offense Conduct Chapter
More informationEL DORADO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
EL DORADO COUNTY VOLUNTARY ELECTRONIC MONITORING PROGRAM Application Packet DATE: NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: CASE NUMBER: THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE REQUIRED AND MUST BE RETURNED WITH THE APPLICATION BEFORE
More information80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY
Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 0th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session Senate Bill 00 SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Sentencing Guidelines (6 th Edition & 6 th Edition, Revised) and General Sentencing Issues
Offense Gravity Score (OGS) Does an increased OGS for ethnic intimidation require a conviction under statute? Guidelines are conviction-based recommendations. Assignment of an OGS is based on the specifics
More information1. The current or related charge is one of domestic violence (AS (c));
Page 2 of 7 Procedures section I, A., 2, shall be deleted: 2. The offender has been found guilty of a major or high moderate infraction within the past 120 days of incarceration or has a pending disciplinary
More informationPrimary Custody 09/19/2014 CLASH OF THE SOVEREIGNS
CLASH OF THE SOVEREIGNS THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE STATES WHEN BOTH ARE PROSECUTING YOUR CLIENT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 JACK SCHISLER ASSISTANT FEDERAL DEFENDER
More informationICAOS Rules. General information
ICAOS Rules General information Effective Date: March 01, 2018 Introduction The Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision is charged with overseeing the day-to-day operations of the Interstate
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ismail Baasit, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1281 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: February 7, 2014 Pennsylvania Board of Probation : and Parole, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION
ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form, or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The entity that drafted
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 26 1
Article 26. Bail. Part 1. General Provisions. 15A-531. Definitions. As used in this Article the following definitions apply unless the context clearly requires otherwise: (1) "Accommodation bondsman" means
More informationPAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-5-15 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: February 21, 2018 POLICY. PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS The Deschutes County Sheriff s Office Adult Jail (AJ)
More informationSession of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-1
Session of 0 SENATE BILL No. By Committee on Judiciary - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to criminal discharge of a firearm; sentencing; amending K.S.A. 0 Supp.
More informationIC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time
IC 35-50-6 Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time IC 35-50-6-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The following amendments to this chapter apply as follows: (1) The
More informationHOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HOUSE BILL No. HOUSE BILL No. December, 00, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. A bill to amend PA, entitled "The code of criminal procedure," by amending sections and
More informationThe Bureau of Prisons (BOP): Operations and Budget
The Bureau of Prisons (BOP): Operations and Budget Nathan James Analyst in Crime Policy March 4, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42486 Summary The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was established
More informationPC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:
STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT NUMBER: 2.05.11 RELATED ORDERS: PC: 1192.7, 457.1, 872, 667.5 ADULT DETENTION DIVISION CHAPTER 2: BOOKING, CLASSIFICATION, PROPERTY, & RELEASE INMATE RELEASE SUBJECT:
More informationFor the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:
Ala.Code 1975 12-25-32 Code of Alabama Currentness Title 12. Courts. (Refs & Annos) Chapter 25. Alabama Sentencing Commission. (Refs & Annos) Article 2.. Alabama Sentencing Reform Act of 2003. (Refs &
More information80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 966 SUMMARY
Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 0th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session Senate Bill SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the
More informationSentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining
Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining Catherine P. Adkisson Assistant Solicitor General Colorado Attorney General s Office Although all classes of felonies have
More informationAmendment to the Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines January 21, 2016 Effective Date August 1, 2016 This document contains unofficial text of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual submitted to Congress, and is provided
More informationCost Benefit Analysis of Maine Prisons Investment
Cost Benefit Analysis of Maine Prisons Investment Policy Analysis & Program Evaluation Professor: Devon Lynch By: Stephanie Rebelo Yolanda Dennis Jennifer Chaves Courtney Thraen 1 Similar to many other
More informationConditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.
OREGON REVISED STATUTES (as amended 2011) TITLE 14 PROCEDURE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS GENERALLY Chapter 137 - Judgment and Execution; Parole and Probation by the Court PROBATION AND PAROLE BY COMMITTING MAGISTRATE
More informationSelected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann
Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 2929.11-2929.14 2929.11 Purposes of felony sentencing. (A) A court that sentences an offender for a felony shall be guided by the overriding
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO * CASE NO. : CR -v- * JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant * OF SENTENCING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On, a sentencing hearing was held pursuant
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, LEACH, HUGHES, SCHWANK, YUDICHAK, BROWNE AND STREET, MARCH 12, 2018 AN ACT
PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS., PRINTER'S NO. 10 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. 1 Session of 01 INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, LEACH, HUGHES, SCHWANK, YUDICHAK, BROWNE AND STREET, MARCH, 01 AS AMENDED
More informationThe Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses
The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses A Brief Overview of South Carolina s Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings 2017 CHILDREN S LAW CENTER UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
More informationCase 1:09-cv PBS Document 34 Filed 03/09/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:09-cv-11597-PBS Document 34 Filed 03/09/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JACK MCRAE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 09-cv-11597-PBS JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, Warden FMC
More informationJurisdiction Profile: Massachusetts
1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION Q. What year was the commission established? Has the commission essentially retained its original form or has it changed substantially or been abolished? The Massachusetts
More informationHighlights. Federal immigration suspects 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Federal Justice Statistics Program August 22, NCJ 191745 Immigration Offenders in the Federal Criminal
More information