VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG
|
|
- Joel Potter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE, and PATRICIA WEBB, v. Plaintiffs, Case No.: {! L 1 L/-f8 3 CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, Defendant. Serve: Kathleen Dooley City Attorney 601 Caroline St, Ste 200B Fredericksburg, VA ' ) COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION COMES NOW, Plaintiffs, Virginia Citizens Defense League and Patricia Webb, and through counsel, pursuant to Virginia Code and , et seq., and submit this, and in support of say the following: Law, P.C.. Parties and Background 1. PlaintiffVirginia Citizens Defense League (hereinafter "VCDL") is a non-profit, grassroots organization, incorporated in the state of Virginia, that is dedicated to advancing the right of all Virginians to keep and bear arms as guaranteed the United States Constitution and Page I of II
2 . Virginia Constitution. 2. VCDL, as an organization, and through its individual members, regularly participates in public debate, legislative lobing, and seeking government accountability as it relates to regulation of firearms rights and the right to keep and bear arms. 3. Plaintiff Patricia Webb (hereinafter "Webb") is a firearms dealer, licensed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 921, et seq., who owns and operates Gadsden Guns Inc., located in Beaverdam, Virginia. 4. As a federally licensed firearms dealer, Webb buys and sells firearms in the regular course of business, including firearms that may be offered for sale through auctions. 5. As a private citizen, Webb is an owner and collector of firearms. If a desirable frrearm is available for sale, especially if it is a rare or collectible firearm, Webb may attempt to purchase the frrearm if it meets her specific criteria (e.g., price, condition, value, etc.). 6. The Fredericksburg Police Department (hereinafter "Police Department") is the law enforcement agency of the City of Fredericksburg. As such, the Police Department is an "agent" of the City of Fredericksburg. 7. Gun buy backs have a tendency to attract old and unused firearms. Often, family members will turn in a firearm that they inherited, without ever knowing or appreciating the potential value of the weapon. Occasionally, one of these old and unused firearms will be a oneof-a-kind collectible that is irreplaceable. Some of these firearms may also have important and irreplaceable historical significance as well. 8. As a result, the auction of firearms that were received through a gun buyback program has the potential to be valuable to a firearms dealer, as well as a collector. Page 2 of II
3 General Assembly Regulates Gun Buybacks 9. In 2012, the General Assembly enacted Va. Code , which sets forth specific requirements and restrictions before any locality may participate in a gun buyback program. 10. Specifically, Code (A) provides: No locality or agent of such locality may participate in any program in which individuals are given a thing of value provided another individual or other entity in exchange for surrendering a frrearm to the locality or agent of such locality unless the governing body of the locality has enacted an ordinance, pursuant to , authorizing the participation of the locality or agent of such locality in such program. (emphasis added) 11. Furthermore, subsection (B) requires that: a. Any firearm received through a buyback program must be offered for sale public auction or sealed bid to a federally licensed frreanns dealer (certain prohibited weapons are excepted), and b. The public auction must be publicized in accordance with specific rules for timin and circulation. c. Lastly, the locality may only destroy a weapon if it was unable to sell the firearm through the public auction process. 12. The General Assembly's intention is clearly evidenced in Code : In order to participate in a gun buyback, localities must frrst engage in the public and transparent legislative process of adopting an authorizing ordinance, and localities are prohibited from destroying frrearms received through a gun buyback unless the firearms are frrst offered for Page 3 of 11
4 auction. Fredericksburg Police Department Gun Buyback 13. On November 27, the Police Department announced the "Fredericksburg Gun Give Back Event," which is scheduled to be held on Saturday, December 13, 2014, at the Fr~depcksburg Police Headquarters. (A screen shot of the Facebook announcement is attached as Exhibit A.) 14. Within the Facebook post, the Police Department included a flier (attached as Exhibit B) that provided the following additional details: For every firearm turned in, our generous sponsor Ms. Doris Buffett will donate $100 to one of these local charities: Empower House, Cops and Kids (Shop with a Cop), Micah Ministries, Thurman Brisben Homeless Shelter All firearms turned over to Police wid be rendered safe and destroyed. You can be sure your unwanted firearms will never be used to commit a crime. (original emphasis omitted) (emphasis added) 15. The individuals surrendering the weapons will be allowed to choose which of the fo charities they wish to receive their $100 donation. 16. Through comments on the Police Department's Facebook page, the Police Department confirmed that the firearms received through the buyback program will not be offered for auction as required Code (B). VCDL, et al. v. City of Fredericksburg Page4 of 11
5 Summary of the Conflicting Interpretations of Code The central dispute lies with the construction of Code (A), which applies to... [participation] in any program in which individuals are given a thing of value provided another individual or other entity in exchange for surrendering a firearm to the locality... (emphasis added) 18. On their Face book page, the Police Department asserted that, because the $100 will be given to a charity (as a third-party beneficiary), they believe the gun buyback is.exempted from the requirements of Code Stated differently, according to the Police Department, Code does not apply to their gun buyback, because (i) the ''thing of value" is the $100 donation, and (ii) the donation is going to the charity-as opposed to the individual surrendering the firearm. 20. The Police Department's interpretation misses the mark. 21. True, the charities will receive the monetary donation. However, the $100 donation i not the only "thing of value" involved in the transaction. 22. The "things of value" are (i) the promise to make the donation and (ii) the individual's ability to choose the third-party beneficiary of the transaction. 23. There is no doubt that a promise is a "thing of value" that can be purchased in a contract. See Brewer v. First Nat. Bank of Danville, 202 Va. 807, 815, 120 S.E. 2d 273, 279 (1961) (confirming that a promise can be "bought and paid for" with valuable consideration). 24. Within the context of a unilateral contract, as in the case at bar, once the acceptingperformance is complete, the performer's ;'previously inchoate rights [to the unperformed Complaint for Temporary Injunction: Declaratory Judgment, and Permanent Injunction Page 5 of 11
6 promise] vest and become legally enforceable. Young v. Birth-Related Neurological Injury, 46 Va. App. 558, 620 S.E. 2d 131, 139 (2005) (citations omitted). 25. Lastly, it is beyond question that parties can direct the benefit of their bargains to third party beneficiaries. See generally Brewer, 202 Va. at 815, 120 S.E. 2d at 280 (describing that consideration will support a contract where the benefit "moves to a third party"); Evntl. Staffing Acquisition Corp. v. B&R Constr. Mgmt. Inc., 283 Va. 787, , 725 S.E. 2d 550, 553 (2012) (describing that "it is well established in this Commonwealth" that a third-party beneficiary may have standing to enforce a contract). 26. In the case at bar, the Police Department's promise to pay $100 to a cl)arity, and the individual's ability to choose the third-party beneficiary, are clearly "things of value" that are given to the individual exchange for the firearm. 27. As such, Code applies to the Police Department's gun buyback. Plaintiffs Harmed Defendant's Violation of Code On information and belief, the City of Fredericksburg has not enacted an authorizing ordinance to participate in a gun buyback program as required Code (A). 29. The failure to enact an authorizing ordinance has deprived VCDL, its members, and the public at large of the opportunity to engage in the public debate, public commenting, and Law, P.C. general legislative process that accompanies the enactment of city ordinances. 30. As a result, the City of Fredericksburg is attempting to engage in a gun buyback program without frrst completing the transparent and public legislative process that is required under Code (A). VCDL, et al. v. City of Fredericksburg Page 6 ofll
7 31. Furthermore, the Police Department has announced a clear and unequivocal intention to destroy all firearms that were turned over, without first offering them for auction as required Code As a licensed firearms dealer and small business owner, Plaintiff Webb's livelihood depends on her ability to provide valuable firearms to her customers at a price that will offer her a reasonable profit for her efforts. The firearms collected through the gun buyback may contain one-of-a-kind weapons of irreplaceable value. Even without exceptional value, the firearms may be suitable to retail sales in Webb's store, Gadsden Guns Inc. 33. The failure to offer the firearms for auction will deprive Webb and other firearms dealers of the opportunity to review and bid on potentially valuable and irreplaceable firearms that she ~ould then sell in the regular course of business. 34. As an individual firearms collector, Webb enjoys the preservation and maintenance o existing collectible firearms. Rare and unique firearms are of limited availability, and as a collector, Webb may only have limited opportunities to buy collectible frrearms. Naturally, once a collectible or historically significant frrearm is destroyed, the loss is irreplaceable. 35. The Police Department's clear intention to destroy all frrearms received through the gun buyback, in violation of Code (8), will deprive Webb and similarly situated collectors of the opportunity to purchase and preserve potentially irreplaceable firearms, the loss of which may never be accurately quantified. Reguest for Temporary Injunction Pending a Full Hearing 36. Plaintiffs repeat their allegations in paragraphs 1 through 35 of the Complaint as if Page 7 of 11
8 fully set forth herein. 37. Pending a full hearing and argument in this court, Plaintiffs request a Temporary Injunction prohibiting the City of Fredericksburg, and its agent the Police Department, a. From proceeding with the gun buyback program scheduled to occur on December 13, b. From proceeding with any other gun buyback program without a properly enacted authorizing ordinance. c. In the alternative, from destroying or disposing of any firearms collected during the gun buyback program, without first offering the firearms for auction. 38. A temporary injunction is necessary because Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law and will likely suffer irreparable harm without a temporary injunction. a. There is no administrative remedy available to Plaintiffs. b. Defendant's violation of Code cannot be reduced to an award of money damages. c. The likely injury to Plaintiff Webb, as a dealer and as a collector, is distinct and cognizable, but it is too speculative to reduce to an award of money damages. d. VCDL, its members, and the public at large have no legal cause of action to seek redress for being deprived of the opportunity to engage in the public debate, Law. P.C. public commenting, and general legislative process that would have certainly accompanied the enactment of the required, but non-existent, authorizing ordinance. 39. Defendant is unlikely to suffer irreparable harm during a temporary injunction. VCDL, et al. v. City of Fredericksburg Page 8 of II
9 a. The Police Department's gun buyback is not time-sensitive and would not be jeopardized a delay. b. Most importantly, even during a temporary injunction, the City of Fredericksburg can enact an authorizing ordinance and continue with the gun buyback program in accordance with Code (Indeed, such a course of action would likely render this entire litigation moot.) 40. The likelihood of success favors the Plaintiffs. The intent of the General Assembly is clear, and it requires a strained reading of Code to conclude otherwise. 41. A temporary injunction clearly benefits the public interest. a. The public interest is clearly served the City of Fredericksburg complying wi state law. b. The public interest will be harmed if the City of Fredericksburg is allowed to proceed with the gun buyback without engaging in the nonnallegislative process of adopting the authorizing ordinance. In essence, the City of Fredericksburg would then be allowed to hold a gun buyback, without the public participation or accountability, which the General Assembly has clearly mandated should be subject to the nonnallegislative process. c. The public interest will benefit in that potentially valuable and irreplaceable firearms will be preserved for posterity and history, as well as offered for sale on the free market. Page 9 of 11
10 Request for Declaratory Judgment 42. Plaintiffs repeat their allegations in paragraphs 1 through 41 of the Complaint as if fully.set forth herein. 43. Plaintiffs request a Declaratory Judgment that the Police Department's gun buyback would be in contravention of Code , that Subsection (A) requires the City of Fredericksburg to adopt an authorizing ordinance prior to holding any such gun buyback program, and that Subsection (B) prohibits the City of Fredericksburg from destroying any firearms before first offering them for auction. Request for Permanent Injunction 44. Plaintiffs repeat their allegations in paragraphs 1 through 43 of the Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 45. Plaintiffs request the issuance of a Permanent Injunction prohibiting Defendant from holding any gun buyback program without complying with the requirements of Code WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court grant a Temporary Injunction as described above pending a full hearing of this matter, award a Declaratory Judgment to Plaintiffs, and grant a Permanent Injunction as described above, and such further relief as justice and equity may require. Complaint for Temporary Injun.ction, Declaratory Judgmen~ and Permanent Injunction Page 10 of II
11 Respectfully submitted, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE PATRICIA WEBB By:. C el W. III, Esq. ROBERT HERRON LAW, P.C. One Columbus Center, Suite 600 Virginia Beach, Virginia Telephone: (757) Facsimile: (888) VSB: Counsel for Plaintiffs Page 11 of 11
12 ExhibitA.
13 Fredericksburg Police Department No"trnber 2.7 4(11 Our upcoming Gun Give Back event will allow you to turn in any unwanted firearms (NO QUESTIONS ASKED) and give back to the community! For every firearm we collect, our sponsor will donate S 100 to a local charity! ij Victoria Waldron, Christina Rydell Nye, Troy Dillard and 31 others like this. L;J 15 shares Q View 11 more commenn II II Clay Kle mm Is the donation considered a tax deduction? Dtcember 2 at 934am Andrew Loposscr Yea, this is stupid. Contact me lf you're Interested In giving away your unwanted firearm. 6 1 Deumber 2 at 10 24am Ralph Carl Patrick Catrone By saying ' no questions asked', isn't that asking criminals to dispose of evidence you could hnve used to ~o lve crimes? Also, there's no mention of any effort to restore stolen firearms to their rightful owners ff one was turned tn. ()ecernber 2 at lo:l4am Q 2 RepUes Sun Colden Lol.... no questions asked December 3 at 2 29pm Kim Bl.shop This Is not a good lde01. Yt.StRrd01y am Devin Banker The criminals can now kill people and then get their guns destroyed. Its perfectl 23 hrs
14 Exhibit B
15
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. v. Civil Action No. Judge: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA WEST VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE, INC., a West Virginia nonprofit corporation, ON BEHALF OF ITS MEMBERS WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF CHARLESTON, WEST
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., PATRICK C. KANSOER, SR., DONALD W. SONNE and JESSICA L. SONNE, Plaintiffs,
More informationCITY OF FORTUNA, Defendant. /
0 Jack Silver, Esq. SBN#0 Kimberly Burr, Esq. SBN#0 Northern California Environmental Defense Center 0 Occidental Road Sebastopol, CA Telephone: (0)- Facsimile : (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Northern
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SCOTT MCLEAN, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant.
More informationCase 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:10-cv-00585-HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGIlIMoI... ~--,::--;;;(g~-=~~ Richmond Division _:Ig- VERNON E. GILLUM, JR.;
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA MICHAEL BURTON, MICHAEL JARVIS and DAVID REED, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:14-CV-76 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. RIVER WATCH, non-profit
1 1 Jack Silver, Esq. SBN#0 Northern California Environmental Defense Center 1 Bethards Drive, Suite Santa Rosa, CA 0 Telephone/Fax: (0)-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Northern California River Watch NORTHERN
More informationCase: 1:18-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case 118-cv-00769-MRB Doc # 1 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 16 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO VERITAS INDEPENDENT PARTNERS, LLC, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Plaintiff A. Donald McEachin, Senator of Virginia, by counsel, and for
V I R G I N I A: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ) ) A. DONALD McEACHIN, Senator of Virginia ) ) v. ) CASE NO. ) WILLIAM T. BOLLING, Lieutenant ) Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia )
More information79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2973
th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session House Bill Sponsored by Representatives POST, SMITH DB; Representatives ESQUIVEL, HEARD, HUFFMAN, NEARMAN, NOBLE, OLSON, RESCHKE, SPRENGER, STARK, WHISNANT,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 03/07/ :02:15 AM
Filing # 86000280 E-Filed 03/07/2019 09:02:15 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA LENKA KNUTSON and ) SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Case No. ) CHUCK CURRY, in his official capacity as ) Sheriff
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division : : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division BRYAN ROTHAMEL vs. Plaintiff, FLUVANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Defendants. COMPLAINT Civil Action No. 311cv Plaintiff,
More informationMARCH 2017 LAW REVIEW GUN PERMITTEES CHALLENGE PARK FIREARM REGULATIONS
GUN PERMITTEES CHALLENGE PARK FIREARM REGULATIONS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2016 James C. Kozlowski As illustrated by the state court opinions described herein, gun owner groups and individuals have
More informationCase 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO David A. Kupernik Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 24K Real Estate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM L. SCOTT, Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, SERVE: Adrianne Todman, Executive Director District
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY American Promotional Events, Inc. East Plaintiff, vs. City of Des Moines, Defendant. Case No. PETITION FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DECLARATORY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Orlando Division
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Orlando Division DEBRA LINDSAY, an individual; SAMANTHA MIATA, an individual; BRIAN ABERMAN, an individual; JACK ABERMAN, an individual; and GEA
More informationFILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 04/17/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/17/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND -----------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 150835/2017 ANN LOPA d/b/a ANNE LOPA REAL ESTATE, EMERGENCY
More informationCase 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:11-cv-00848-NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LISA A. ARDINO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION ALAN KACHALSKY, CHRISTINA NIKOLOV, and Case No. SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-03645 Document 1 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION OTIS McDONALD, ADAM ORLOV, ) Case No. COLLEEN LAWSON,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:13-cv-04902 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS True Value Company, vs. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Andrew
More informationCase 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 5:15-cv-00112-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ELISSA SHETZER, Individually and on Behalf of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION MARK N. CHAFFIN Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MICHAEL R. BRADEN and LBC MANUFACTURING Defendants.
More informationLAWS GOVERNING THE ACCOUNTING FOR PROPERTY SEIZED AND FORFEITED, CONFISCATED AND OTHERWISE OBTAINED (COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT)
LAWS GOVERNING THE ACCOUNTING FOR PROPERTY SEIZED AND FORFEITED, CONFISCATED AND OTHERWISE OBTAINED (COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT) OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR Division of Technical Assistance August
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Henry G. Wykowski (State Bar No. 0) Andrew F. Scher (State Bar No. 0) HENRY G. WYKOWSKI & ASSOCIATES Montgomery Street, Suite San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile:
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 143 Filed: 10/17/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1018
Case: 1:10-cv-04257 Document #: 143 Filed: 10/17/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SECOND AMENDMENT ARMS (a d/b/a of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of FISCHER AVENUE, UNIT D COSTA MESA, CA 0 Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. (SBN: ) ak@kazlg.com Fischer Avenue, Unit D Costa Mesa, CA Telephone: (00) 00-0
More informationCase 1:17-cv ELH Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-02006-ELH Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 425 Third Street, SW, Suite 800 Washington,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 14-646 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SAI, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District
More informationCase 4:17-cv SMR-SBJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 22
Case 4:17-cv-00212-SMR-SBJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 22 BELLINO FIREWORKS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ANKENY,
More informationCase 3:11-cv JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3
Case 3:11-cv-00005-JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG West Virginia Citizens Defense League,
More information3:18-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
3:18-cv-03085-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 14 E-FILED Monday, 16 April, 2018 09:28:33 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JENNIFER J. MILLER,
More informationWilliam G. Kanellis, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for Defendant.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 07-532C Filed: July 7, 2008 TO BE PUBLISHED AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, Bid Protest; Injunction; v. Notice Of Appeal As Of Right, Fed. R.
More informationCase: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:16-cv-00581-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HAMDI HASSAN, on behalf of himself
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION Operating Engineers of Wisconsin, ) IUOE Local 139 and Local 420, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. Scott
More informationCase 2:14-cv JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Case 2:14-cv-02263-JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ABG EPE IP LLC, Plaintiff, v. NO. Fabbrica d Armi
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
[Student Name], v. [Public Agency], IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME] Plaintiff, Defendant Case No. [Number] COMPLAINT Action for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
More informationCase 0:12-cv RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15
Case 0:12-cv-62249-RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT FOR EXCELLENCE,
More informationCase 1:14-cv M-LDA Document 1 Filed 07/23/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:14-cv-00337-M-LDA Document 1 Filed 07/23/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND JARREN GENDREAU : : vs. : Case No: : JOSUE D. CANARIO, :
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #19-5042 Document #1779028 Filed: 03/24/2019 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : DAMIEN GUEDUES, et al., : : No. 19-5042 Appellants : : Consolidated
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOSEPH DANIEL GOADE, ) an individual, ) Civil Action No.: 3:15-cv-01067 Plaintiff, ) ) Judge Traugher v. ) )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE L. V., a minor, by and through his parent and guardian, LENARD VANDERHOEF Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MARYVILLE and MARICE KELLY DIXON in his
More informationCase 1:19-cv LAS Document 4 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:19-cv-00449-LAS Document 4 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE MODERN SPORTSMAN, LLC; RW ARMS, LTD.; MARK MAXWELL, Individually; and MICHAEL STEWART, Individually,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI MARY HILL, 1354 Wildbriar Drive Liberty, MO 64068, and ROGER B. STICKLER, 459 W. 104 th Street, #C Kansas City, MO 64114, and Case No. MICHAEL J. BRIGGS,
More informationCase 1:17-cv CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:17-cv-01340-CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Gong Fan, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationNEEDLEMAN AND PISANO Montville Professional Building 161 Route 202, P.O. Box 187 Montville, New Jersey (973) Attorneys for Plaintiffs
NEEDLEMAN AND PISANO Montville Professional Building 161 Route 202, P.O. Box 187 Montville, New Jersey 07045 (973) 334-4422 Attorneys for Plaintiffs * SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY and INJUNCTIVE RELIEF and to REDRESS DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JAMES L. TOBIN, CHRISTINA MARIE TOBIN, RAE ) ANN McNEILLY, GLENN WESTPHAL and CAROL ) WESTPHAL, individually and as representatives
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT
Case 2:07-cv-04024-JF Document 1 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIGNATURES NETWORK, INC. : a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CI-389 DIVISION II STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARY LOU MARZIAN
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CI-389 DIVISION II STATE REPRESENTATIVE JIM WAYNE STATE REPRESENTATIVE DARRYL OWENS STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARY LOU MARZIAN PLAINTIFFS
More informationCase 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-0-SI Document Filed //0 Page of 0 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States Attorney ELIZABETH J.
More informationCase 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 1:14-cv-00026-JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CONTOUR HARDENING, INC. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 0 LLOYD ANDERSON, PAIGE CRAFORD, and MILLARD CHRISTNER, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, Defendant.
More informationCase 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cv-01007-CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 'ILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 01 COMMUNIQUE LABORATORY, INC. ) Cvf^
More informationCase 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20
Case :-cv-000-dms-rbb Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 0 Chiharu G. Sekino (SBN 0) SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP 0 West A Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Phone: () - Facsimile: () 00- csekino@sfmslaw.com
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:16-cv-07382 Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KALI KANONGATAA, Plaintiff, Docket No. - against - JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AMERICAN BROADCASTING
More informationCase KLP Doc 60 Filed 09/19/17 Entered 09/19/17 15:52:21 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 TOYS R US, INC., et al., Debtors. Case No. 17-34665 (KLP) (Joint Administration
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DOYLE BYRNES, 6702 W. 156 th Terrace Overland Park, KS 66223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No
V I R G I N IA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2012-0003411 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: JOHN M. BEGAKIS (Bar No. ) john@altviewlawgroup.com JASON W. BROOKS (Bar No. ) Jason@altviewlawgroup.com ALTVIEW LAW GROUP, LLP 00 Wilshire Boulevard,
More informationCase 2:14-cv TLN-DAD Document 1 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-tln-dad Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC BRADLEY A. BENBROOK (SBN ) STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY (SBN 0) 00 Capitol Mall, Suite 0 Sacramento, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CHANCERY DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CHANCERY DIVISION MOSE VINES ACADEMY LOCAL ) SCHOOL COUNCIL, ET AL. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 08 CH 4912 ) THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARTHA HAYES, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:07-cv-1237 MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Hon. Robert J. Jonker and THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :
Brent T. Winder (USB #8765) Brent A. Orozco (USB #9572) JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & McDONOUGH PC Attorneys for Maggie Sottero Designs, LLC 170 South Main Street, Suite 1500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone
More informationCase 1:16-cv NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87
Case 1:16-cv-06122-NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMMON CAUSE NEW YORK, as an organization and on behalf
More informationCase 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:14-cv-02223-L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-02542 Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION JOHN MORDOFF, on his own ) behalf and for all others
More informationNo Argued: July 23, October 14, 2008
1 ARMALITE, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marcia F. LAMBERT, Director of Industry Operations, Columbus Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Respondent-Appellee. No. 07-4290.
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00038 Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOMALTUS LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT
More informationChapter 19 PRECIOUS METALS DEALERS*
Chapter 19 PRECIOUS METALS DEALERS* Sec. 19-1. Definitions. Sec. 19-2. Records to be kept; copy furnished to local authorities. Sec. 19-3. Officers may examine records or property; warrantless search and
More information10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES
/0/ :0 PM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH FREEDOM FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Defendant : COMPLAINT. Parties and Jurisdiction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SOUTHCOAST FAIR HOUSING, INC. : : Plaintiff : : v. : C.A. No. 18- : DEBRA SAUNDERS, in her official capacity as : Clerk of the Rhode Island
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NEW GENERATION CHRISTIAN ) CHURCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) ROCKDALE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ) JURY DEMANDED
More informationCase 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:18-cv-01012-RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO TECHNO LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE AIRBUS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--
Case 1:17-cv-00100-YK Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GREGORY J. HARTNETT, ELIZABETH M. GALASKA, ROBERT G. BROUGH, JR., and JOHN
More informationIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs 1CV-11-2228 v. (JONES) CORBETT, et al. Defendants Electronically Filed PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EMERGENCY
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand
Case 1:15-cv-10597 Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DUNE JEWELRY, INC. Plaintiff, v. REBECCA JAMES, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-10597
More informationCase 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01162-RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROTHSCHILD PATENT IMAGING LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
CLERKS OFFICE U.S. DIST. COURT AT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JULIA C. DUDLEY, CLERK BY: /s/ J. JONES DEPUTY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY A. LOVITKY Attorney at Law 1776 K Street N.W. Washington D.C. 20006 Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIMON J. TORRES MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004, v. Plaintiff, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT SHAUNNE N. THOMAS, : : Plaintiff, : : VS. : C.A. No. : JUSTICE ROBERT G. FLANDERS, : JR., in his Official Capacity as : Appointed Receiver to the City
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BADGER METER, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 SENSUS USA INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Badger Meter, Inc., for
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division. v. Case No. 3:08cv709 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
MCCAIN-PALIN, 2008, INC. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division v. Case No. 3:08cv709 JEAN CUNNINGHAM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
More informationCase 1:18-cv PLM-RSK ECF No. 40 filed 03/01/19 PageID.305 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:18-cv-01429-PLM-RSK ECF No. 40 filed 03/01/19 PageID.305 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
DISTRICT COURT, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO P.O. Box 192, 307 Moffat Ave., Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 Plaintiff: TOWN OF WINTER PARK, a Colorado home rule municipal corporation; v. Defendants: CORNERSTONE
More informationCase 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 1 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General 3 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA, INC. ) 11250 Waples Mill Rd. ) Fairfax, VA 22030, ) ) SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. )
More informationCourthouse News Service
-\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PICTURE PATENTS, LLC, ) ) \.L Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. j.'o&cv o?&>4' MONUMENT REALTY LLC, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendant.
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationCase 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed // Page of HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JANE ROE AND JANE ROE on behalf of themselves and on
More informationCase Doc 148 Filed 08/05/16 Entered 08/05/16 17:15:49 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 Amelia C. Joiner Kathleen M. Ryan One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110-1726 Telephone (617) 341-7700 Facsimile (617) 341-7701 Attorneys for Webster Bank, National Association UNITED
More informationCase KRH Doc 1 Filed 06/22/16 Entered 06/22/16 17:28:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Debtors. 5 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Davis et al v. Pennsylvania Game Commission Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHY DAVIS and HUNTERS ) UNITED FOR SUNDAY HUNTING ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) PENNSYLVANIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Judge:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VICTORIA S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., Four Limited Parkway Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 v. Plaintiff, THOMAS PINK
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Kenneth J. Montgomery, Esq. (KJM-8622) KENNETH J. MONTGOMERY, PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 451 Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.403.9261 Telephone 718.403.9593 Facsimile UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:17-cv-04831-WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POWER PLAY 1 LLC, and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, NORFOLK
More information) CascNo.6O/V3?O APR ) $CLERK&I4ATER /) ) ) Comes now Plaintiff, Shayne Kyle Austin, by and through his counsel, Luke A.
) CascNo.6O/V3?O Plaintiff, ) SHAYNE KYLE AUSTIN, ) ELIZABETH CARPENTER ) $CLERK&I4ATER /) APR 01 2014 IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DECATUR COUNTY, TEN1ESSEE who is bound by the immunity agreement entered
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY APR STATE OF OKLAHOMA PATRICIA PRESLEY, COURT CLERK
FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLA. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY APR -1 2010 STATE OF OKLAHOMA PATRICIA PRESLEY, COURT CLERK OKLAHOMA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff,
More information