UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Master File: JAR NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Master File: JAR NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS x : IN RE WESTAR ENERGY, INC. : ERISA LITIGATION : x Master File: JAR NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Your legal rights might be affected if you are a member of the following class: ANY PERSON, EXCLUDING DEFENDANTS, WHO WAS A PARTICIPANT IN OR BENEFICIARY OF THE WESTAR ENERGY, INC. EMPLOYEES 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN (THE PLAN ) AT ANY TIME DURING THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 1998 THROUGH JANUARY 1, 2003 (THE CLASS PERIOD ) AND WHOSE ACCOUNT IN THE PLAN INCLUDED INVESTMENTS IN THE WESTAR ENERGY, INC. COMPANY STOCK FUND (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ) PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION. YOU HAVE NOT BEEN SUED. This notice ( Notice ) advises you of a proposed settlement (the Settlement ) of a consolidated class action lawsuit brought by plaintiffs Richard A. Toledo, Scott A. Hilderbrandt, Billy J. Williams, Randy J. Herman, Marsha Ericson, Donald L. Croucher, Marty J. Cummings, Jr., Maria A. Gonzalez, Larry Kampschroeder, Stephen Randel, George Ludwig, Mark A. Mueller, Steven M. Short, Thomas Engelken, Ronald J. Leiker, William Dale Renner, Robert L. Griffith, Robert W. Mackey, James A. Stanley, Thomas F. Hodges, Carl M. Joost, Paul E. Lira, James M. File, Sandra S. Cummings, Joe Zwiesler, Rosa M. Nicholson, and Harold J. Holmes (collectively, Named Plaintiffs ) on behalf of themselves and as representatives of the Settlement Class against defendants Westar Energy, Inc. (the Company ), the Investment and Benefits Committee, David C. Wittig, William B. Moore, Ira W. McKee, Jr., Carl M. Koupal, Jr., Richard D. Terrill, Bruce A. Akin, James A. Martin, Paul R. Geist, and Larry D. Irick (collectively, Defendants ), alleging that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties and violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA ). Named Plaintiffs and Defendants are referred to herein as the Parties. The Settlement will provide for a cash payment of $9,250,000 to the Plan and for a pro rata allocation of this payment to the accounts of members of the Settlement Class who had portions of their accounts invested in Company Stock in proportion to their loss in value of Company Stock during the Class Period. The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement. Payments will be made only if the Court approves the Settlement and that approval is upheld in the event of any appeals. This process is explained in greater detail in this Notice. Identification of Key Terms: This Notice contains summary information with respect to the Settlement. The terms and conditions of the Settlement are set forth in a Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Settlement Agreement ). Capitalized and italicized terms used in this Notice, but not defined in this Notice, have the meanings assigned to them in the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement, and additional information with respect to this lawsuit and the Settlement, are available at Counsel for the Settlement Class, Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, 280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087, and Ralston, Pope & Diehl, LLC, 2913 S.W. Maupin Lane, Topeka, KS ( Appointed Counsel ), have established a toll-free phone number ( ) and address WestarERISAsettlement@sbclasslaw.com if you have questions. Reasons for the Settlement: The Settlement resolves claims against Defendants for allegedly breaching their fiduciary duties and violating ERISA. The Settlement is not, and should not be construed as, an admission of any fault, liability or wrongdoing whatsoever by any of the Defendants. The Named Plaintiffs and Appointed Counsel believe that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The Named Plaintiffs and Appointed Counsel believe that the Settlement provides a substantial benefit in the form of $9,250,000 (nine million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars) in cash (less various expenses described in this Notice), as compared to the risks and delays of proceeding with this litigation. Identification of Attorney s Representatives: Any questions regarding the Settlement should be directed to Appointed Counsel: Joseph H. Meltzer, Gerald D. Wells, III, Schiffrin & Barroway LLP, 280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087, ; Ronald Pope, Ralston, Pope & Diehl, LLC, 2913 S.W. Maupin Lane, Topeka, KS 66614, Please do not contact the Court or the Company. They will not be able to answer your questions.

2 ACTIONS YOU MAY TAKE IN THE SETTLEMENT NO ACTION IS NECESSARY TO RECEIVE PAYMENT. YOU CAN OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 13, YOU CAN GO TO THE HEARING ON JULY 27, 2006 by FILING A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAR NO LATER THAN JULY 13, If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you do not need do anything in order to receive a payment. You can write to the Court and explain why you do not like the Settlement. If you have submitted a written objection to the Court, you can ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the Settlement. This litigation, known as In re Westar ERISA Litigation, Master File No JAR, (the Action ) is a consolidated case in which Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants breached fiduciary duties they owed to the participants in and beneficiaries of the Plan. Copies of the Complaint and other documents filed in the Action are available at SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT A Settlement Fund consisting of $9,250,000 million in cash, plus interest, will be established in the Action. The Settlement Fund (less the payment of approved expenses, attorneys fees and costs) will be paid to the Plan and allocated to Settlement Class members in accordance with the Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court. As with any litigation, the Parties would face an uncertain outcome if the Action were to continue. Continued litigation of the Action against Defendants could result in a judgment or verdict greater or lesser than the recovery under the Settlement Agreement, or in no recovery at all. Moreover, this litigation has been hotly contested from the outset. Indeed, throughout this litigation, Named Plaintiffs and Defendants have disagreed on both liability and damages, and they do not agree on the amount that would be recoverable even if Plaintiffs were to prevail at trial. Defendants have denied and continue to deny the claims and contentions alleged by Named Plaintiffs, that they are liable at all to the Settlement Class, and that the Settlement Class or the Plan have suffered any damages for which Defendants could be held responsible. Nevertheless, the Parties have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in this litigation, particularly its complex nature, and have concluded that it is desirable that the Action be fully and finally settled on the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Why did I get this Notice package? 1. You or someone in your family are or may have been a participant in or beneficiary of the Plan and/or one of its predecessors who had a portion of his or her Plan account invested in the Company Stock Fund ( Westar Fund ). The Court has directed that this Notice be sent to you because, as a potential class member, you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of this Action before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, and all objections and appeals are favorably resolved, the net amount of the Settlement Fund will be paid to the Plan and then allocated among Settlement Class members according to a court-approved Plan of Allocation. 2. The Court where this litigation is pending is the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. 3. This Notice explains the Action, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how you will receive your portion of the benefits. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of a hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the proposed Settlement and to consider the application of Appointed Counsel s attorneys fees and reimbursement of expenses of litigation expenses (the Fairness Hearing ). 4. The Fairness Hearing. The Fairness Hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. (C.D.T.) on JULY 27, 2006 before the Honorable Julie A. Robinson in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, 405 United States Courthouse, 444 S.E. Quincy, Topeka, Kansas 66683, to determine: (a) Whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved by the Court; (b) Whether the claims against Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice as set forth in the Settlement Agreement; (c) Whether the application by Appointed Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses should be approved; and (d) Whether the application of each of the Named Plaintiffs for a Case Contribution Award of up to $1,000 (one thousand dollars) should be approved. 5. The issuance of this Notice is not an expression of the Court s opinion on the merits of any claim in the Action, and the Court still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, payment to the Plan Trust will be made after all appeals, if any, are favorably resolved. It is always uncertain whether such appeals can be favorably resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. Please be patient. 2

3 How do I know whether I am part of the Settlement? 6. The Court has certified the Action as a class action for purposes of this Settlement only. If you were a participant in or beneficiary of the Plan (or its predecessor), at any time between the period from July 1, 1998 through January 1, 2003, and your Plan account included investment in the Westar Fund (or its predecessor), then you are a member of the class covered by the Settlement. What does the Settlement provide? 7. A Settlement Fund consisting of $9.25 million in cash, plus interest, is being established in the Action. The net amount in the Settlement Fund, after payment of, and establishment of reserves for, any taxes and court-approved costs, attorney s fees, and expenses will be paid to the Plan and, after payment of implementation expenses, the remaining amount will be allocated to members of the Settlement Class according to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court. Allocations will be made to the Plan accounts of members of the Settlement Class. Plan accounts may be created for those members of the Settlement Class who no longer have Plan accounts and who are entitled to an award under the Plan of Allocation. Disbursement of the Settlement Fund to the Settlement Class will occur once the Settlement has become Final once all appeals are favorably decided and all appeal periods have run. The above description of the operation of the Settlement is only a summary. The governing provisions are set forth in the Settlement Agreement (including its exhibits), which may be obtained at What will be my share of the Settlement Fund? 8. Your share of the Settlement Fund, if any, will be determined using a methodology that takes into account the value of your investment in the Westar Fund account at the beginning of the Class Period, the value of additional Westar Fund purchases (whether as a result of Company matching or from voluntarily deferred contributions), and the proceeds of Westar Fund sales or withdrawals. That methodology, called the Plan of Allocation, will be implemented by the Plan trustee based on the Plan records. The Court will be asked to approve the Plan of Allocation at the Fairness Hearing. The Plan of Allocation determines your settlement using three steps: A. Your Net Loss Is Calculated Your Net Loss, for the purpose of the allocation methodology, is the total of the dollar value of your holdings in the Westar Fund at the beginning of the Class Period (July 1, 1998) plus (+) the dollar value of units you purchased in the Westar Fund during the Class Period minus (-) the dollar value of units you sold or withdrew from the Westar Fund during the Class Period minus (-) the dollar value of your holdings in the Westar Fund at the end of the Class Period (January 1, 2003). B. Your Net Loss Percentage Is Calculated Your Net Loss Percentage will be determined by dividing your Net Loss by the total Net Loss of all Settlement Class Members. C. Your Share of the Net Settlement Amount Is Calculated Your Net Loss percentage will determine the dollar value of your share, if any, of the Net Settlement Amount. Your share will be your Net Loss Percentage multiplied by the Net Settlement Amount. But, no member of the Settlement Class who is entitled to a share or allocation of the Net Settlement Amount will receive less than $10. The Plan trustee or any third party vendor mutually agreed upon by the Parties will perform all calculations for you and determine both whether you are entitled to a share of the Net Settlement Amount and your share amount. The Plan trustee or any third party vendor mutually agreed upon by the Parties will have access to all Plan records so you need not be concerned if you no longer have personal statements. The Court will be asked to approve a more detailed statement of the Plan of Allocation, a copy of which is available along with other settlement documents at Defendants, to the extent they were participants or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time during the period from July 1, 1998 through January 1, 2003, will be excluded from the Plan of Allocation. What is the lawsuit about? What has happened so far? 9. Beginning on March 7, 2003, twenty-seven class actions under ERISA (the ERISA Actions ) were brought on behalf of a purported class of individuals who participated in the Plan, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties in violation of ERISA. By Order dated September 23, 2003, the ERISA Actions were consolidated under Master File No In the Consolidated Complaint dated October 22, 2003 (the Complaint ), Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Defendants were fiduciaries of the Plan and violated fiduciary duties under ERISA by causing the Plan to offer, purchase and hold units of the Company Stock at a time, when according to Plaintiffs, the Westar Fund was allegedly an unsuitable and imprudent investment for the Plan. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants violated ERISA by misrepresenting to Plaintiffs and Plan participants the true financial condition of the Company and, consequently, the true value of the Westar Fund. Plaintiffs sought to recover from Defendants losses to the Plan caused by Defendants alleged misconduct. 3

4 11. On December 22, 2003, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. The motions to dismiss were fully briefed. On September 29, 2005, the Court issued a ruling granting in part and denying in part Defendants motions to dismiss. 12. Appointed Counsel and counsel for Defendants have reached an agreement to settle the Action on terms that are summarized herein. Named Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their counsel, have conducted an extensive investigation of the allegations in the Action and evaluated its merits. Further, the Parties, also with the assistance of counsel and an independent mediator, have engaged in substantial arm s length negotiations in an effort to resolve all claims that have been or could have been asserted in the Action. Appointed Counsel and counsel for Defendants have conducted numerous meetings and conferences in which the terms of the Settlement detailed herein were extensively debated and negotiated. Why is this case a class action? 13. In a Class action, one or more plaintiffs, called Named Plaintiffs, sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. All of the individuals on whose behalf the Named Plaintiffs are suing are Class Members, and they are also referred to herein as members of the Settlement Class. The Court resolves the issues for all Class Members. U.S. District Judge Julie A. Robinson is presiding over this case. Why is there a Settlement? 14. Under the proposed Settlement, the Court will not decide the merits of the Action in favor of either Plaintiffs or Defendants. By agreeing to a Settlement, both Plaintiffs and Defendants avoid the costs and risks of litigating the Action. 15. This Settlement is the product of extensive negotiations between Appointed Counsel and the Defendants counsel, including the services of an experienced mediator. Throughout the settlement negotiations, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants were advised by various consultants and experts, including individuals with expertise in ERISA fiduciary liability issues, insurance coverage issues, and estimating potential damages in cases involving ERISA fiduciary liability. 16. Appointed Counsel believe that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interest of the Settlement Class. How can I get my portion of the recovery? 17. Members of the Settlement Class do not need to file a claim for recovery in this Action. Members of the Settlement Class who are current Plan participants and are authorized to receive a recovery will have their Settlement proceeds deposited in their Plan account. A Plan account will be established for any member of the Settlement Class who no longer participates in the Plan. Any such members of the Settlement Class will receive notification of the creation of such account or forwarding along with further instructions regarding how a distribution can be received. Any questions regarding the distribution of the Settlement Fund can be directed to or WestarERISAsettlement@sbclasslaw.com. When would I get my payment? 18. Payment is conditioned on several matters, including the Court s approval of the Settlement and such approval becoming Final and no longer subject to any appeals to any court. Upon satisfaction of various conditions, the Net Settlement Amount will be paid to the Plan and allocated to the accounts of Settlement Class members pursuant to the Plan of Allocation (described in 8 above) as soon as possible after final approval has been obtained for the Settlement (which includes exhaustion of any appeals). Any appeal of the final approval could take several years. Any accrued interest on the Settlement Fund will be included in the amount paid to the Plan and allocated to the Plan accounts of Settlement Class members. The Settlement Agreement may be terminated on several grounds, including if the Court does not approve or modifies the Settlement. Should the Settlement Agreement be terminated, the Settlement will be terminated, and the Action will proceed as if the Settlement had not been reached. What rights am I giving up in the Settlement? 19. If the Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment. This judgment will (i) dismiss the claims against Defendants with prejudice; and (ii) provide that each of the Named Plaintiffs and all other members of the Settlement Class, on behalf of themselves and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns and all persons acting in concert with any such person, shall, with respect to each and every Released Claim (as defined below in 20), waive, release, forever discharge and dismiss and agree not to institute, maintain or prosecute any or all Released Claims against any or all of the Releasees (as defined in the Settlement Agreement) and shall be permanently and finally enjoined without the necessity of posting a bond from commencing or prosecuting any actions or other proceedings asserting any of the Released Claims, either directly, indirectly, representatively, derivatively or in any other capacity, against any of the Releasees herein. This injunction expressly extends to all claims covered by the Settlement Agreement and all members of the Settlement Class. 20. The Released Claims shall be: any and all claims of any nature whatsoever (including claims for any and all losses, damages, unjust enrichment, attorneys fees, disgorgement of fees, litigation costs, injunction, declaration, contribution, indemnification or any other type or nature of legal or equitable relief), whether accrued or not, whether known, unknown, or unsuspected, in law or equity, as well as any claim or right obtained by assignment, brought by way of demand, complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim, third-party claim or otherwise (collectively, Claims ), arising out of or in any way related to, directly or indirectly, any or all of the acts, omissions, facts, matters, transactions or occurrences: (A) during the Class Period that are, were or could have been alleged, asserted, or set forth in the 4

5 Complaint; or (B) concerning the calculation of amounts to be distributed to members of the Settlement Class and/or the allocation or distribution of the Net Proceeds of the Settlement Fund to members of the Settlement Class, except that such release shall run in favor of those Persons actually undertaking the calculation, distribution and/or allocation, only provided that such calculations, distributions, or allocations are performed in good faith. Can I exclude myself from the Settlement? 21. You do not have the right to exclude yourself from the Settlement. For settlement purposes, the Action was certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1) because the Court determined the requirements of the rules were satisfied. Thus, it is not possible for any Settlement Class members to exclude themselves from the Settlement. As a member of the Settlement Class, you will be bound by any judgments or orders that are entered in the Action for all claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action or are otherwise included in the release under the Settlement. 22. Although members of the Settlement Class cannot opt out of the Settlement, they can object to the Settlement and ask the Court not to approve the Settlement. See 26. Do I have a lawyer in the case? 23. The Court has appointed the law firms of Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, and Ralston, Pope & Diehl, LLC as Appointed Counsel for Named Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. You will not be charged directly by these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. How will the lawyers be paid? 24. At the Fairness Hearing, Appointed Counsel will apply for an award of attorneys fees and expenses on behalf of all Plaintiffs counsel. The application for attorneys fees will not exceed 30% of the Settlement Fund. 25. To date, neither Appointed Counsel nor any of Plaintiffs counsel have received any payment for their services in prosecuting this Action on behalf of the Settlement Class, nor have counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested by Appointed Counsel would compensate all of Plaintiffs counsel for their efforts in achieving the Settlement for the benefit of the Settlement Class and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a contingency basis. The Court will determine the actual amount of the award. As stated above, you can tell the Court that you do not agree with all or any portion of the Settlement. How do I tell the Court that I don t like the Settlement? 26. Any member of the Settlement Class may appear at the Fairness Hearing and show cause why Settlement of the Action embodied in the Settlement Agreement should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate and why a judgment should not be entered thereon, or why the attorneys fees and expenses should not be awarded; provided, however, that no member of the Settlement Class shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement and the judgment to be entered approving the same unless such Settlement Class Member has filed with the Court written objections (which state all supporting bases and reasons for the objection, set forth proof of their membership in the Settlement Class, clearly identify any and all witnesses, documents and other evidence of any kind that are to be presented at the Fairness Hearing in connection with such objections, and further describe the substance of any testimony to be given by themselves as well as by any supporting witnesses). 27. To object, you must send a letter or other written statement saying that you object to the Settlement in In re Westar ERISA Litigation, No. 03-CV-4032-JAR. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, signature, and a full explanation of all reasons you object to the Settlement. Your written objection must be filed with the Court, and mailed to the counsel listed below, postmarked (and sent via facsimile) by no later than JULY 13, 2006: Filed with the Clerk of the Court: Clerk of the Court United States District Court for the District of Kansas 444 S.E. Quincy 490 U.S. Courthouse Topeka, Kansas and, by the same date, has served copies of all such papers by mail and faxed to each of the following: Joseph H. Meltzer Gerald D. Wells, III SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA Facsimile: Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 5

6 Sharon Katz DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY Facsimile: Counsel for Defendants Westar Energy, Inc. and the Investment and Benefits Committee UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE COURT, ANY SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER WHO DOES NOT OBJECT IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED HEREIN WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ANY OBJECTION AND SHALL BE FOREVER FORECLOSED FROM MAKING ANY OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND THE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? 28. The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 1:30 p.m. (C.D.T.) on JULY 27, 2006, at the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, 444 S.E. Quincy, 490 U.S. Courthouse, Topeka, Kansas IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OR THE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES, YOU NEED NOT ATTEND THE FAIRNESS HEARING. 29. At the hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. After the Fairness Hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement. The Court will also rule on the motions for attorneys fees and expenses. We do not know how long these decisions will take. 30. Appointed Counsel will answer questions Judge Robinson might have. You are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, it will be before the Court when the Court considers whether to approve the Settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate. You may also have your own lawyer attend the Fairness Hearing at your expense, but such attendance is not necessary. 31. If you are a Class member, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Fairness Hearing. To do so, you must send a letter or other paper called a Notice of Intention to Appear at Fairness Hearing in In re Westar Energy, Inc. ERISA Litigation, No JAR. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, and your signature. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be served on the attorneys listed in 27, postmarked and sent via facsimile no later than JULY 13, 2006, and must be filed with the Clerk of the Court at the address listed in 27, postmarked no later than JULY 13, The Fairness Hearing may be delayed by the Court without further notice to the Settlement Class. If you wish to attend the Fairness Hearing, you should confirm the date and time with Appointed Counsel. What happens if I do nothing all? 33. If you do nothing and you are a Class member, you will participate in the Settlement of the Action as described above in this Notice if the Settlement is approved. How do I get more information? 34. This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. The complete Settlement is set forth in the Settlement Agreement. You may obtain a copy of the Settlement Agreement by making a written request to Appointed Counsel listed on page 2. Copies of the Settlement Agreement, as well as the Preliminary Motion, seeking preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement, and the Preliminary Approval Order, may also be obtained at Plaintiffs Appointed Counsel also have established a toll-free phone number to receive your comments and questions: , and may also be contacted via at: WestarERISAsettlement@sbclasslaw.com. 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ARTHUR STEIN, EDWIN HUMPHRIES, DAVID BAILEY, and ROBERT MACCINI, on behalf of the Employee Investment Plan of Stone & Webster Incorporated and Participating

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> RAMIREZ V JCPENNEY CORP ERISA CLASS ACTION ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5514 PO BOX 2572 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9572 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: 2008 FANNIE MAE ERISA 09-CV-01350-PAC LITIGATION MDL No. 2013 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MIGHT BE AFFECTED IF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) Lead Case No.: 1:03-CV-147 DOREEN GEE, et al., ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, ) ) MDL Case No. 1:03-md-1552 v. ) ) JUDGE CURTIS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAURIE NICHOLSON, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, No.: 3:16-cv-00258-SDD-EWD Plaintiff, vs. Franciscan

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. ERISA LITIGATION II Master File No.: 08-CV-5722 (LTS) (DCF) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Actions NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Brian J. Martin, Yahmi Nundley, and Katherine Cadeau, individually and on behalf Case No. 2:15-cv-12838 of all

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15 Pg 2 of 82 Pg ID 4166 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In re Enron Corporation ERISA Litigation ) No. H-01-3913 (Consolidated Cases) ) ) TO ALL MEMBERS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOSEPH SCOTT SHERRILL and KEITH A. SIVERLY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Case No. 04-72949 Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION EBRAHIM SHANEHCHIAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. MACY S, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-cv-00828-SAS-SKB Judge S. Arthur Spiegel

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : x STANLEY YEDLOWSKI, etc., v. Plaintiffs, ROKA BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : Case No. 14-CV-8020-FLW-TJB NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: COVENTRY HEALTH CARE, INC. ERISA LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: MASTER FILE: 8:09-CV-02661 (AW) Judge Alexander

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00715-KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND HEARING If you

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. C.A. No JLT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. C.A. No JLT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE CVS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : : X C.A. No. 01-11464 JLT NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION PETER KALTMAN, MALCOLM LORD, CELESTE NAVON, DAVID W. ORTBALS, PAUL E. STEWARD, GARCO INVESTMENTS, LLP Individually

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS

More information

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 52 Case 3:15-cv-01113-VAB

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB)

MASTER FILE NO. 2: 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x MASTER FILE NO. 2 03-CV-1270 (JS) (ETB) NOTICE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS NO. 02-1860-A JUDGE GERALD BRUCE LEE NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA FREDRIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. CHINA GREEN AGRICULTURE, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO 4000 Justice Way, Suite 2009 Castle Rock, CO 80109 IN RE ADVANCED EMISSIONS SOLUTIONS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) IN RE AOL TIME WARNER ) ERISA LITIGATION ) Civil Action No. 02 CV 8853 (SWK) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ERISA ACTION ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION EXHIBIT A-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION EXHIBIT A-1 Case 5:12-cv-05162-SOH Document 433-2 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 11321 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK COUNTY, ss. SUPERIOR COURT ALAN SANDERSON, DONATO BUCCELLA and MARK SILVERMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. : : : VERDASYS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ELETROBRAS SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-5754-JGK NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BENJAMIN MICHAEL MERRYMAN, AMY WHITAKER MERRYMAN TRUST, B MERRYMAN AND A MERRYMAN 4TH GENERATION REMAINDER TRUST AND CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. CASE NAME AND DOCKET NUMBER: CHELSEA KOENIG V.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C 01-3952 CRB LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document Relates to:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF PATRICK LENTSCH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-00012-DAK-EJF VISTA OUTDOOR INC., MARK W. DEYOUNG,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, AEROPOSTALE, INC., THOMAS P. JOHNSON and MARC

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY HOWARD GRADEN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:05-cv-00695-SRC CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., DWIGHT W.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT POPTECH, L.P., individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 310-cv-967 (SRU) v. STEWARDSHIP

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CELESTICA INC. SEC. LITIG. : : : : : Civil Action No.: 07-CV-00312-GBD (ECF CASE) Hon. George B. Daniels NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:09-cv-01350-PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: 2008 FANNIE MAE ERISA LITIG. 09-CV-01350-PAC MDL No. 2013 NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON IN RE WSB FINANCIAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. C07-1747RAJ NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, AND (2) HEARING ON PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x IN RE CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES : Civil Action No. W-04-CA-177 SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Ca l i f o r n i a

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Ca l i f o r n i a Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Ca l i f o r n i a In re LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions Master File

More information

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE REVLON, INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. LITIGATION : 99-CV-10192 (SHS) x This Document Relates to: : All Actions : x NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I I USDC SDNY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I I USDC SDNY re- /) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. : Master File No. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA : 07-cv-9633 (JSR)(DFE) LITIGATION I I USDC SDNY DOCUMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Johnson, et al., vs. Couturier, et al. Stanton vs. Couturier, et al. No. 2:05-cv-02046 RRB GGH No. 2:07-cv-01208 WBS-JFM NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-000352 IN RE PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249 (WHP) NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION;

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant. Case 116-cv-02487-KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, - against

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JOE M. WILEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. ENVIVIO, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants. Master File No.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division In re: TVIA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document relates to: ALL ACTIONS. X :: X :: : : X No. C-06-06304-RMW CLASS ACTION

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC. C.A. No. 12619-CB NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE COINSTAR INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: The Securities Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case No. C11-133 MJP NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GUY RATZ, Individually and on behalf of : all others similarly situated, : : Plaintiff, : : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13 cv 06808

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A court in Nevada authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Please be advised that if you held the common stock of ClubCorp

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation Case 14 81156 CIV WPD NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE SUNRUN INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-02537-VC CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

District of New Hampshire X :: : X

District of New Hampshire X :: : X United States District Court District of New Hampshire In re: StockerYale, Inc. Securities Litigation. X :: : X Master File No. 1:05cv00177-SM CIVIL ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Case 2:05cv00204DB Document 1053 Red 11/07/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Exhibit B IN RE imergent SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No.: 2:05-cv-0204

More information