Testator s Family Maintenance Claims: Estrangement. Kieren Mihaly Barrister
|
|
- Noreen Horn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Testator s Family Maintenance Claims: Estrangement Kieren Mihaly Barrister
2 1. It is not uncommon for a testator to write someone out of their will. Sometimes that exclusion is the result of long-term animosity and sometimes it is the result of spite. It is obvious therefore, that the defensibility of such conduct must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 1 But at some point, regardless of the biological relationship between a child and parent or the legal relationship between partners, common sense dictates that such relationships must be considered irrelevant; in Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9, the High Court sensibly rejected an application where there had been no contact between the testator and the claimant for over 40 years. Colourfully, excluding a child from a will has been explained as acceptable where one treats their parents callously, by withholding, without proper justification, their support and love from them in their declining years. Even more so where that callousness is compounded by hostility But despite the above and the freedom of testation, it is very difficult for a testator to exclude someone from their will. Conceptually, exclusion is reserved here as a term for those to whom a testator may have a responsibility to make adequate and proper provision; in the absence of a possible responsibility, the testator was not excluding that person, but was instead simply not making provision voluntarily. Whether an exclusion is effective has been the subject of numerous cases and much precedent, but despite that, any case involving exclusion still requires only the application of Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 ( Act ). And like much of the authorities under the Act, estrangement turns on the specific facts of a given case such that there is no definitive basis for asserting that an estranged person was or was not owed a duty by the deceased For the avoidance of doubt, the concepts in this paper build on those previously stated in my paper entitled Testator Family Maintenance: General Principles. Role of Exclusion in the Assessment of a Testator Family Maintenance Claim 4. Whether an exclusion is effective is the equivalent of asking whether the excluded would fail in an application under Part IV of the Act. Only where they would be unsuccessful has the testator not breached their obligations to the excluded by their exclusion. Thus: It is now well recognised that in determining the strength of the moral claim of an adult child upon its parent, and correspondingly the measure of proper maintenance to be provided by a testator in all the circumstances, it is proper to take into account the conduct of the claimant towards the testator and their mutual association and the closeness of the bond existing between them. 4 1 Alabakis v Alabakis [2012] VSC 437, [30] 2 Malone v Range [2012] NSWSC 1032, cited with approval in Brandon v Hanley [2014] VSC 103, [24] 3 Morris v Smoel [2014] VSC 32, [70] 4 Re Buckland [1966] VR 404, 413
3 5. And by way of conclusion it has been expressed that: an estrangement, particularly in later years, of the plaintiff from the deceased may well weaken substantially the moral force of the asserted claim if it does not destroy the claim entirely Yet, the role of estrangement is not as clear cut as that. In Collicoat v McMillan, 6 while Ormiston J agreed that the behaviour of the excluded towards the deceased provided a basis for measuring the testator s obligation towards them, he went on to say that: [t]heir sins are irrelevant except in so far as a testator might properly take exception to their behaviour. It is only when that behaviour has affected, or (arguably) is perceived to have affected, the testator that he or she is in good conscience entitled to make lesser or greater provision for an applicant than that to which the applicant would have been entitled having regard only to the bare bones of his or her financial needs and circumstances. What is right and proper, and thus what the wise and just testator must do, is not determined by the character and conduct of each applicant but by what the testator ought to have felt in duty bound to provide notwithstanding any defects in character or conduct but nevertheless having due regard to the nature of their relationship with and their treatment (whether morally reprehensible or the opposite) of the testator during his or her lifetime. It is only when that behaviour has affected, or (arguably) is perceived to have affected the testator that he or she is in good conscience entitled to make a lesser or greater provision for an applicant than that to which the applicant would have been entitled having regard only to the bare bones of his or her financial needs and circumstances And likewise in Palmer v Dolman 8 it was observed that the mere fact of estrangement between parent and child should not ordinarily result, on its own, in the child not being able to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement of the Act On that basis, estrangement involves asking whether the relationship between the excluded and the deceased was akin to strangers or acquaintances of no mention. When the question is so expressed, the critical issue becomes clear; has the relationship, previously of the sort requiring a bequest, deteriorated enough to absolve a testator of all responsibilities they may once have had to a person. 5 Brown v Macauley [1999] WASC 208, [19] as cited with approval in Valentini v Valentini [2014] VSC 91, [49] 6 [1999] 3 VR Collicoat v McMillan [1999] 3 VR 803, [2005] NSWCA 361, cited with approval in Brandon v Hanley [2014] VSC 103, [24] 9 Palmer v Dolman [2005] NSWCA 361, [110]
4 Testator s Reasons 9. The reasons of the testator for the exclusion are very relevant. But, as those reasons cannot override the Act, 10 the reasons likely only provide an explanation of the testator s conduct. 11 However, by reason of s 60 of the Evidence Act 2008, the reasons may be admitted as proof that those reasons were valid, although it is doubtful that much weight will be placed upon those reasons. 10. It can therefore be expected that it is difficult to prove estrangement as there will likely only be one person able to give first hand evidence of the conduct said to give rise to the estrangement. Cause of Exclusion 11. Even where the estrangement has been significant, an excluded person may still warrant provision from a deceased where the estrangement was not their fault. True, a plaintiff who has distanced themselves from the deceased is far more likely to have absolved the deceased of a moral responsibility towards them. But conversely, a testator cannot substantiate the absence of a responsibility on death to the excluded by pointing to their earlier breach of their responsibilities to the excluded while alive. 12. Further, much like the chicken and the egg, it must be determined as best as possible who was primarily responsible for the poor behaviour of the excluded and the deceased to each other. In Valentini v Valentini [2014] VSC 91, after finding that the Deceased failed in his parental duty 12 and that his children were the victims of that failure, 13 the court concluded that: [t]his places the conduct of the children towards their father, and their consequential estrangement, in a unique position and works in this case to very substantially mitigate the Applicants neglect of their father which might otherwise have been of greater weight in a consideration of their Applications Thus in Greely v Greely [2011] VSC 416, the Court was faced with the unusual situation of a deceased being estranged from most of her children. On that basis, the Court was not prepared to attribute fault for the estrangement to any given Applicant and largely dismissed the estrangement as a relevant factor. 15 Likewise, in Alabakis v Alabakis [2012] VSC 437, the court placed limited weight on the estrangement between the applicant daughter and the deceased where the estrangement began while the applicant was a teenager and she witnessed violent conduct by the deceased towards his son, her brother. 10 Morris v Smoel [2014] VSC 32, [74] 11 Hughes v National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 134, Valentini v Valentini [2014] VSC 91, [51] 13 Valentini v Valentini [2014] VSC 91, [51] 14 Valentini v Valentini [2014] VSC 91, [51] 15 Greely v Greely [2011] VSC 416, [70], [84]
5 Conclusion 14. The exclusion of a family member from a will is not uncommon. An estate will usually have difficulty defending that exclusion except in the limited situation where the estrangement was very significant, extended over a long period of time and was due, in a large part, to the conduct of the applicant. In almost all other situations, the exclusion will likely be in breach of the testator s obligations. 15. However, even where the exclusion was inappropriate, a partial estrangement will be relevant to the proper level of provision due. If estrangement is considered a sliding scale, where total estrangement disentitles an applicant, partial estrangement will limit a testator s obligation. Of course, the reality is far less mathematical than that, but such an approach appropriately recognises the diminishing obligation of a testator to those with whom they have become estranged. 16 July 2014 K Mihaly Owen Dixon Chambers West
Testator s Family Maintenance Claims: General Principles. Kieren Mihaly Barrister
Testator s Family Maintenance Claims: General Principles Kieren Mihaly Barrister 1. The point of a will is for a person to dictate how they want their assets divided on their death. And just as a person
More informationFIGHTING INHERITANCE ACT CLAIMS - A GUIDE FOR CHARITIES. In times of financial and fiscal austerity Charities face lean times.
FIGHTING INHERITANCE ACT CLAIMS - A GUIDE FOR CHARITIES In times of financial and fiscal austerity Charities face lean times. All of those who work and/or live in London will see individuals seeking to
More informationSIMON PITT PROFILE BARRISTER - VICTORIAN BAR CONTACT INFORMATION SOCIAL NETWORK BACKGROUND
BARRISTER - VICTORIAN BAR BAR ROLL: 2003 ADMITTED: 2002 CONTACT INFORMATION Ninian Stephen Chambers, Room 3816, Level 38, 140 William Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Ph: +61 3 9225 6978 0402 064 292 SIMON PITT
More informationLEGALWISE 10 POINTS IN ONE DAY. 31 March 2010 WILLS & ESTATES PRACTICE UPDATE
LEGALWISE 10 POINTS IN ONE DAY 31 March 2010 WILLS & ESTATES PRACTICE UPDATE 1. Update on Family Provision Applications - disentitling conduct / estrangement 2. Update on enduring powers of attorney 3.
More informationMarch 2017 Bulletin 86 to WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION PRACTICE (QUEENSLAND)
March 2017 Bulletin 86 to WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION PRACTICE (QUEENSLAND) by Dr John K de Groot Bulletin Editor: Terence B Ogge, lawyer Subscriptions representative: Email: info@degrootspublishing.com
More information(handed down as Ilott v The Blue Cross and others [2017] UKSC 17)
Ilott v Mitson Judgment of the Supreme Court, 15 th March 2017 (handed down as Ilott v The Blue Cross and others [2017] UKSC 17) At 9.45am on 15 th March 2017 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in
More informationHome made wills - a matter of trust
w i l l s w a t c h Welcome to Piper Alderman s Wills Watch which aims to provide accessible and informative summaries on current succession law and estate administration issues. July 2012 Home made wills
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Re: Estate of Carrigan (deceased) [2018] QSC 206 PARTIES: In the Estate of GRANT PATRICK CARRIGAN, Deceased FILE NO/S: SC No 5708 of 2018 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING
More informationaccountant examination of accounts accounting attorneys. lawyers beneficiaries accounting affidavits
accountant examination of accounts passing accounts, 115 117, Form ACC4, Form ACC5 dispensing with formal passing, 103, Form ACC10 ACC12 court order, 105 notice, proceeding without, 104 objection, 106,
More informationCAVEATS AGAINST DEALINGS IN LAND WHEN TO LODGE AND HOW TO REMOVE PRESENTED ON 14 FEBRUARY 2014 NICHOLAS JONES, BARRISTER
CAVEATS AGAINST DEALINGS IN LAND WHEN TO LODGE AND HOW TO REMOVE PRESENTED ON 14 FEBRUARY 2014 BY NICHOLAS JONES, BARRISTER POWER TO LODGE A CAVEAT 1. Section 89(1) of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 provides
More informationCourt of Appeal. New South Wales. Medium Neutral Citation: Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392. Hearing dates: 22 October 2014.
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hearing dates: Decision date: Before: Decision: Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392 22 October 2014 18 November 2014 Basten JA at [1];
More informationTHE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (SMALL ESTATES) (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT. Statutory Instrument
THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (SMALL ESTATES) (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT. Statutory Instrument 156 1. The Administration of Estates (Small Estates) (Special Provisions) (Probate and Administration) Rules.
More informationWills and Probate Case update
19 December 2014 Wills and Probate Case update Carol McOmish Barrister Nathan McOmish Barrister Owen Dixon Chambers 205 William Street Melbourne Vic 3000 DX 94 Melbourne Vic P: 03 9225 7333 F: 03 9225
More informationBEDDOE ORDERS: ADEQUATE COSTS PROTECTION FOR TRUSTEES AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES? Jennifer Seaman
BEDDOE ORDERS: ADEQUATE COSTS PROTECTION FOR TRUSTEES AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES? Jennifer Seaman 1 Introduction 1. This paper will focus on Beddoe Orders and whether they provide suitable costs protection
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Pike v Pike [2015] QSC 134 PARTIES: Adam Lindsay PIKE (applicant) v Stephen Jonathan PIKE (respondent) FILE NO: SC No 3763 of 2015 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING
More informationThe Supreme Court sitting as the Court of Civil Appeal [4 April 1992] Before President M. Shamgar and Justices D. Levin, Y. Malz
CA 30/92 Naiman v. Attorney-General 1 Simchah Naiman v. Attorney-General CA 30/92 The Supreme Court sitting as the Court of Civil Appeal [4 April 1992] Before and Justices D. Levin, Y. Malz Appeal on the
More informationThe Dependants Relief Act, 1996
1 The Dependants Relief Act, 1996 being Chapter D-25.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1996 (effective February 21, 1997) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001, c.34 and 51. NOTE: This consolidation
More informationThe Dependants Relief Act
The Dependants Relief Act being Chapter 111 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1940 (effective February 1, 1941). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience
More informationSection 2(1) of the Testators' Family Maintenance Act provides that:
The subject of an address I once listened to at the Canadian Bar Convention was entitled "Post Mortem Estate Planning". This was described as being related to the change or repairs which can be made to
More informationThe following is a sample extract from The Complete Guide to SMSFs and Planning for Loss of Capacity and Death.
The following is a sample extract from The Complete Guide to SMSFs and Planning for Loss of Capacity and Death. DBA Lawyers has updated The Complete Guide to include the recent decision of Wooster v Morris
More informationTrusts Law 463 Fall Term Lecture Notes No. 3. Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract.
Trusts Law 463 Fall Term 2013 Lecture Notes No. 3 TRUST AND BAILMENT Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract. Bailment exists where one person (the bailee) is voluntarily possessed
More informationFamily Provision Claims in New South Wales
Legalwise Continuing Legal Education Seminars Parramatta 25 February 2016 Family Provision Claims in New South Wales Presented by Christopher Lawrence * Introduction 1. The focus of this paper is Family
More informationTWENTY-SECOND REPORT LAW REFORM COMMITTEE THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
SOUTH AUSTRALIA TWENTY-SECOND REPORT of the LAW REFORM COMMITTEE SOUTH AUSTRALIA THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION BONDS AND TO THE RIGHTS OF RETAINER AND PREFERENCE OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 CLAIM NO. 560 of 2006 (DENISE HYDE CARD ( BETWEEN( AND ( (FREDRICK GEORGE HYDE JR. (RUSSEL DANE HYDE APPLICANT 1 ST RESPONDENT 2 ND RESPONDENT Coram: Hon. Justice
More informationOliver Wooding, Barrister St John s Chambers
Wills, Trusts and Tax Team Contentious Probate Case Law Update 2016 Oliver Wooding, Barrister St John s Chambers Our apologies this has not been a vintage year. Supreme Court will hear a further quantum
More informationHARRIET BROWN BARRISTER AND JERSEY ADVOCATE OLD SQUARE TAX CHAMBERS
HARRIET BROWN BARRISTER AND JERSEY ADVOCATE OLD SQUARE TAX CHAMBERS I am an English barrister and Jersey advocate and represent clients regularly in courts in both jurisdictions. I advise taxpayers, in
More informationIlott - Upholding Testamentary Freedom. Ilott (respondent) v The Blue Cross and others (Applicants) [2017] UKSC 17
Temple London EC4Y 7BA T. 2 7353 4854 F. 2 7583 8784 DX. LDE 19 clerks@3djb.co.uk www.3djb.co.uk Ilott - Upholding Testamentary Freedom Ilott (respondent) v The Blue Cross and others (Applicants) [217]
More informationSECURITY FOR COSTS MOTIONS
SECURITY FOR COSTS MOTIONS Introduction Motions for security for costs provide a means for a defendant to ensure, before litigation proceeds too far, that there is a fund of money in place to pay the defendant's
More informationIT AIN T OVER TIL ITS OVER. Therese Catanzariti Barrister, 13 Wentworth
IT AIN T OVER TIL ITS OVER Therese Catanzariti Barrister, 13 Wentworth challenge Challenging a will - PROBATE forgery testamentary capacity undue influence suspicious circumstances knowledge and approval
More informationRe Armstrong, Deceased [1960] VicRp 34; [1960] VR 202 (19 December 1958)
Re Armstrong, Deceased [1960] VicRp 34; [1960] VR 202 (19 December 1958) Re ARMSTRONG, deceased SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA HERRING, CJ 4, 19 December 1958 Herring, CJ, delivered the following written judgment:
More informationPre-Emptive Costs Order Application
Pre-Emptive Costs Order Application This is a situation where a party in a civil proceedings may obtain an order in advance of the trial that his costs shall be paid out of a fund irrespective of the outcome
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Adams (Dec d) [2012] QSC 103 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: BS 6915/11 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: TREVOR ROBIN HOPPER AS EXECUTOR OF THE WILL OF EDGAR GEORGE ADMAS (DECEASED) (applicant)
More informationFamily Provision: the Turning of the Worm CRAIG BIRTLES COLLEGE OF LAW SPECIALIST LEGAL CONFERENCE: WILLS & ESTATES SEMINAR ON 13 AND 14 MAY 2017
1 Family Provision: the Turning of the Worm CRAIG BIRTLES COLLEGE OF LAW SPECIALIST LEGAL CONFERENCE: WILLS & ESTATES SEMINAR ON 13 AND 14 MAY 2017 2 About the author Craig was admitted to practice as
More informationEstate Elizabeth May Henson or May Henson or May Brown or Mable Brown' or Elizabeth May Brown RESERVED DECISION
Minute Book:131 AOT 230 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Place: Whanganui. Present: C M Wainwright, Judge Date: 15 October 2003 Application No: A 19990010926 Subject: A20010004689
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Nadao Stott v Lyons and Stott (as executors) [2007] QSC 087 PARTIES: NADAO STOTT (under Part IV, sections 40-44, Succession Act 1981) (applicant) AND FILE NO/S: BS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL SUIT NO. 43 OF 2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Appearances: Stanley K John for the Applicants Dr Kenneth John for the Opposant Advira Bennett - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017
4...-...-.. ----. ---... - ---.-. --,...-, --.... - -. 4 4 -.., SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LAURA CICCOTTO, individually and as Executor of Index No. 155092/2017 the Estate
More informationChapter 25 Wills, Intestacy, and Trusts
Chapter 25 Wills, Intestacy, and Trusts McGraw-Hill 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Will Will: Sometimes referred to as a testament, it is a person s declaration of how he or
More informationStatutory Notice Provisions to Beneficiaries Under Estates
Statutory Notice Provisions to Beneficiaries Under Estates by Nafeesa Valli-Hasham Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.643.3147 nvh@cwilson.com www.cwilson.com Statutory Notice Provisions to Beneficiaries Under
More informationis commonly called "publication" of the will, and is typically satisfied by the words "last will and testament" on the face of the document.
EXECUTORSHIP On the death of a man/woman, his/her property will pass on to someone else. The right to own the property left behind by the deceased and exercise control over it will need to be determined.
More informationLegislation that applies to Wills and Estates. AFOA Workshop Saskatchewan March 17 th, 2015
Legislation that applies to Wills and Estates AFOA Workshop Saskatchewan March 17 th, 2015 LEGISLATION & COMMON LAW WILLS AND ESTATES ARE GOVERNED BY LEGISLATION and COMMON LAW LEGISLATION IS THE WRITTEN
More informationUpdate on contentious probate and trust cases
Update on contentious probate and trust cases Richard Gold, St John s Chambers Published on 27 th October [References in square brackets are to paragraph numbers in the judgments.] Hutchinson v Grant [2016]
More informationTHE SECOND LIMB OF BARNES V ADDY
THE SECOND LIMB OF BARNES V ADDY Introduction The second limb of Barnes v Addy 1 provides a cause of action against persons who provide knowing assistance to a trustee or fiduciary who dishonestly and
More informationP did not intend to relinquish possession. No one else has assumed possession
Trespass to Goods 1. Did P have possession? a. Actual possession i. P has physical control and intends to exercise control on their behalf Wilson v Lombank b. Constructive Possession Ashby v Tolhurst i.
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Vickers v Pickering [2016] QDC 58 PARTIES: NOELA FRANCES VICKERS (first applicant) MARIA ANNE GEARING (second applicant) v HELEN PICKERING (first respondent) FILE
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A TANIA MARIE CHARTERIS Applicant. CATRINA ROWE Respondent
181 Waiariki MB 108 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160001810 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Sections 113 and 117 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 David John Charteris (deceased)
More informationGuide to Wills and Estates Section I 1 OVERVIEW
Guide to Wills and Estates Section I 1 OVERVIEW This Guide covers two areas of practice which are closely related: Wills and Estates. Section II Wills covers: what a Will is; the purpose and, therefore,
More informationWILLS THAT SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE : AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE ON SPENCE V BMO TRUST COMPANY I INTRODUCTION
WILLS THAT SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE : AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE ON SPENCE V BMO TRUST COMPANY ESTERINA ELIZABETH LENTINI* I INTRODUCTION Is there any judicial recourse for the child of a deceased person who
More informationSection 3-Executors and Witnesses.
WILLS ACT 1971 (ACT 360) Section 1-Power to Make a Will. (1) Any person of or above the age of eighteen years may in writing and in accordance with this Act make a will disposing of any property which
More informationI Will You Will He/She Will We Will They Will
FEBRUARY 2015 Staying Connected For the Alumni of the: ECCB Savings and Investments Course ECCB Entrepreneurship Course ECCB Small Business Workshops YOUR FINANCIAL I Will You Will He/She Will We Will
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Drescher v. Drescher Estate, 2007 NSSC 352. Docket: SH. No
Page 1 of 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Drescher v. Drescher Estate, 2007 NSSC 352 Docket: SH. No. 278018 Date: 20071121 Registry: Halifax Between: Gisela Drescher, by her attorney Alex
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. 2. Who can
More informationSuccession Act 2006 No 80
New South Wales Succession Act 2006 No 80 Contents Chapter 1 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 Part 2.1 The making, alteration, revocation and revival of wills Division
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationAny number of claimants or defendants may be joined as parties to a claim.
PART 20 Addition And Substitution Of Parties part 20 PARTIES GENERAL 20.1 Any number of claimants or defendants may be joined as parties to a claim. 20.2 Parties may be removed, added or substituted in
More informationContentious Probate Update. Is want of knowledge and approval effectively a. dead duck following Gill v. Woodall?
Contentious Probate Update Is want of knowledge and approval effectively a dead duck following Gill v. Woodall? The Liberal View by Guy Adams, St John s Chambers (Delivered as one side of a debate on the
More informationFAMILY PROVISION IN AUSTRALIA: ADDRESSING INTERSTATE DIFFERENCES AND FAMILY PROVISION LAW REFORM
FAMILY PROVISION IN AUSTRALIA: ADDRESSING INTERSTATE DIFFERENCES AND FAMILY PROVISION LAW REFORM Address given at the Queensland Law Society conference on Family Provision by the Hon Justice Roslyn Atkinson
More informationWhen do parole authorities owe a duty of care to those injured by prisoners on parole? By Martin Cuerden
When do parole authorities owe a duty of care to those injured by prisoners on parole? By Martin Cuerden The responsibility of parole authorities for offences com m itted by those on parole is a topical
More informationWho Can Act for Someone? What are They Required to Do? Guardianships and Other Fun Topics *** Sean Fahey Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman
Who Can Act for Someone? What are They Required to Do? Guardianships and Other Fun Topics *** Sean Fahey Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman 1 Who can act? Often individuals are no longer able to capably
More information1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 21.1.2010 + TEST CAS.No.35/1999 SHAMA SETHI Versus Through:...Petitioner Mr. Anil K. Kher, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rishi Manchanda & Mr.S.S.Pandit,
More informationCredit Ombudsman Service. Guidelines to the. Credit Ombudsman Service Rules
Credit Ombudsman Service Guidelines to the Credit Ombudsman Service Rules 2nd Edition Effective: 21 February 2007 Credit Ombudsman Service Limited ACN 104 961 882 PO Box A252 Sydney South NSW 1235 www.creditombudsman.com.au
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Fay Margaret Sadler v Timothy Eggmolesse [3] QSC PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 439 of 2 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: DELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON: DELIVERED AT: FAY MARGARET
More informationSPEAKERS NOTES. Length of presentation: Suggested form of introduction: 1. MAKING A WILL 2013 WILL AWARENESS DAY
2013 WILL AWARENESS DAY SPEAKERS NOTES Length of presentation: The Elder Law & Succession Committee ( Committee ) suggests the Will Awareness Day talks run for no longer than 25-30 minutes. Speakers might
More informationNegligence Case Law and Notes
Negligence Case Law and Notes Subsections Significance Case Principle Established Duty of Care Original Negligence case Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] ac 562 The law takes no cognisance of carelessness in
More informationContested Wills and Inheritance Disputes
Contested Wills and Inheritance Disputes How can we help you? We offer sympathetic handling of disputes concerning Wills and Inheritance. We realise how distressing such matters can be over and above your
More informationCriminal Law Guidebook - Chapter 12: Sentencing and Punishment
The following is a suggested solution to the problem on page 313. It represents an answer of an above average standard. The ILAC approach to problem-solving as set out in the How to Answer Questions section
More informationProbate Jurisdiction Problems
Nebraska Law Review Volume 46 Issue 1 Article 10 1967 Probate Jurisdiction Problems Kent E. Person University of Nebraska College of Law, kent@holdregelaw.com Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO ESTATE OF : O P I N I O N MARION C. RYAN, DECEASED : CASE NO.
[Cite as In re Estate of Ryan, 2011-Ohio-3891.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO ESTATE OF : O P I N I O N MARION C. RYAN, DECEASED : CASE NO. 2010-L-075 : Civil Appeal
More informationProvince of Alberta FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter F-8. Current as of December 11, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 11, 2013 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park
More informationDEPENDANTS OF A DECEASED PERSON RELIEF ACT
c t DEPENDANTS OF A DECEASED PERSON RELIEF ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended
More informationministrator of estate of testator s daughter-in-law
, 281 494 FOLSOM et al. v. ROWELL et al. Smith v. Rowell et al. Nos. S06A1980, S06A1981. Supreme Court of Georgia. Jan. 7, 2007. Background: Testator s heirs sought construction of will provision that
More informationTHE INHERITANCE ACT IN 2016
THE INHERITANCE ACT IN 2016 Tim Walsh, Guildhall Chambers 1. There have been two major developments in the law concerning the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 in the last two
More informationSupreme Court New South Wales
Supreme Court New South Wales Case Name: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) Medium Neutral Citation: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) [2015] NSWSC 1832 Hearing Date(s): 30 November 2015 Date of Orders: 4 December 2015 Date
More information2014 Bill 8. Third Session, 28th Legislature, 63 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 8 JUSTICE STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2014
2014 Bill 8 Third Session, 28th Legislature, 63 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 8 JUSTICE STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2014 MS KENNEDY-GLANS First Reading.......................................................
More informationPRECIS OF THE REPORT INTO THE DISMISSAL OF DEPUTY HEADMASTER, ROHAN BROWN
PRECIS OF THE REPORT INTO THE DISMISSAL OF DEPUTY HEADMASTER, ROHAN BROWN This precis summarises the principal parts of the report submitted by Mr Ray Finkelstein AO QC and Ms Renee Enbom. For a number
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 38 Filed: 09/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:395
Case: 1:10-cv-00478 Document #: 38 Filed: 09/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:395 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LINDSEY HAUGEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 10 C 478 v. )
More informationBusiness Succession and Estate Planning Bulletin
March 2017 Business Succession and Estate Planning Bulletin In this bulletin: Enduring powers of attorney in estate planning Testamentary statements a useful tool when judiciously utilised Contact Paul
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND SUMAIR MOHAN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 45 of 2008 BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPELLANTS AND SUMAIR MOHAN RESPONDENT PANEL: A. Mendonça,
More informationPowers of Attorney Act 2006
Powers of Attorney Act 2006 1. ORGAN DONATION The legislative provisions 12 Meaning of health care matter In this Act: health care matter, for a principal, means a matter, other than a special health care
More informationBrightman J, in Ottway Norman[1972] Ch 698 identified the basic requirements for a fully secret trust:
Secret trusts In this month s CPD we are going to look at a secret trusts and ensure that the student can identify and distinguish between the two different types of secret trusts. The paper will also
More informationTrusts Bill. Explanatory note. Government Bill
Trusts Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill will replace the Trustee Act 1956 and the Perpetuities Act 1964 to make trust law more accessible to everyday users. The
More informationThe Forfeiture Rule SUBMISSION TO THE VICTORIAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION
The Forfeiture Rule SUBMISSION TO THE VICTORIAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION Date: 8 May 2014 Queries regarding this submission should be directed to: Courtney Guilliatt Ph: (03) 9607 9375 Email: cguilliatt@liv.asn.au
More informationPRESENTATION FOR PUBLIC FORUM ON DEMENTIA. 21 September 2010
PRESENTATION FOR PUBLIC FORUM ON DEMENTIA 21 September 2010 Recap on last year Types of Power of Attorney General Power of Attorney Enduring Power of Attorney Financial Matters Personal Matters Advance
More information15FED.CAS. 48 LOCKHART ET AL. V. HORN ET AL. [1 Woods, 628.] 1. Circuit Court, S. D. Alabama. April Term,
YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES 15FED.CAS. 48 Case No. 8,445. [1 Woods, 628.] 1 LOCKHART ET AL. V. HORN ET AL. Circuit Court, S. D. Alabama. April Term, 1871. 2 FEDERAL COURTS CITIZENSHIP OF PARTIES DISMISSAL
More informationIN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER
SAINT LUCIA IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO.: SLUHCV 2003/0138 BETWEEN (1) MICHELE STEPHENSON (2) MAHALIA MARS (Qua Administratrices of the Estate of ANTHONY
More informationESTATE & TRUSTS P.N. Davis (Winter 2000) I. (45 min.)
ESTATE & TRUSTS P.N. Davis (Winter 2000) I. (45 min.) Attesting witnesses: - testimony of one or both attesting witnesses is needed to probate the will [ 473.053.1] - if both are dead (as here), then proof
More informationBARRY ALLAN CONTACT PART II. Introduction 1. OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACT 2. A MODEL OF CONTRACT
BARRY ALLAN CONTACT PART II Introduction 1. OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACT We use the objective principle to decide whether there has been an agreement, consideration and intention to be bound between the
More informationRANDOLPH RUSSELL. 2011: April 20th DECISION
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 227 OF 2008 BETWEEN: THELMA HALL NEE RUSSELL EWART RUSSELL (Attorney on Record
More informationSenate Bill No. 277 Senator Wiener
Senate Bill No. 277 Senator Wiener CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to estates; revising provisions relating to the succession of property under certain circumstances; modifying the compensation structure authorized
More informationBELIZE WILLS ACT CHAPTER 203 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE WILLS ACT CHAPTER 203 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the Law
More informationLuke Davey s unsuccessful Judicial Review against Oxfordshire - a social work perspective
Luke Davey s unsuccessful Judicial Review against Oxfordshire - a social work perspective Pete Feldon author of The Social Worker s Guide to the Care Act 2014 (to be published by Critical Publishing in
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2013-02861 IN THE MATTER OF THE WILLS AND PROBATE ACT, CH. 9:03 AND THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES 1998, AS AMENDED, PART 72 AND IN THE
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWHC 459 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Case No: HC07C01375 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 11/03/2008 Before : MR JUSTICE MORGAN
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO/S: SC No 3223 of 2015 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Re Sobey & Anor as T ees of the Will of Norman Lance Cummins (deceased) [2015] QSC
More informationCONSENTS AND APPROVALS BOILERPLATE CLAUSE
CONSENTS AND APPROVALS BOILERPLATE CLAUSE Need to know A consents and approvals clause establishes the process and manner by which a party may give or withhold consent or approval under a contract. If
More informationSAMOA TRUSTEE COMPANIES ACT (as amended, 2009) Arrangement of Provisions. PART I - Preliminary and Registration of Trustee Companies
SAMOA TRUSTEE COMPANIES ACT 1987 (as amended, 2009) Arrangement of Provisions PART I - Preliminary and Registration of Trustee Companies 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Application
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Smith v Lucht [2014] QDC 302 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: D1983/2013 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: BRETT CLAYTON SMITH (plaintiff) v KENNETH CRAIG LUCHT (defendant)
More informationVibro-Pile Aust Pty Ltd. Melbourne Deputy President C. Aird Directions hearing
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. D188/2007 CATCHWORDS Application for joinder concurrent wrongdoers Part IVAA of Wrongs Act 1958 whether
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Zen Ridgeway Pty Ltd v Adams & Anor [2009] QSC 117 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 4565/09 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ZEN RIDGEWAY PTY LTD as trustee for THE LEE FAMILY TRUST ACN 109
More informationROBERT LEE CANODY, II OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH July 19, 2018 CHERYL A. HAMBLIN, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices ROBERT LEE CANODY, II OPINION BY v. Record No. 170747 JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH July 19, 2018 CHERYL A. HAMBLIN, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NELSON COUNTY Michael T.
More information