Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 1 of 9
|
|
- Duane Hancock
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION ALBERTO VASQUEZ-MARTINEZ, ) PETITIONER, PLAINTIFF, ) ) v. ) C.A. ) MICHAEL J. PITTS, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR ) IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ) MICHAEL OCHOA, DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL, ) IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ) ERIC HOLDER, Jr., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) and ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) RESPONDENTS, DEFENDANTS. ) ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Alberto Vasquez-Martinez ("Mr. Vasquez"), through counsel, files the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief. He also seeks a temporary restraining order, and/or preliminary injunction. Two issues are raised. First, he challenges the constitutionality of a system which allows the Respondents to detain him for an extended period, without reaching the question of whether they have jurisdiction over him, i.e., of whether he is a United States citizen. He also challenges their interpretation of 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1), 1 under which they suddenly decided to detain him under that provision, even though he was released from criminal custody in the offense for which he was initially placed in removal proceedings in 2005, and since then, they twice released him on his own recognizance, in part because of his claim to United States citizenship, and in part on the basis of humanitarian considerations, in that he is the sole source of support for his U.S. citizen wife and six children, and also helps support his two children from his first marriage. 1 The Office of Chief Counsel defends its decision to hold Mr. Vasquez under mandatory detention by reference to Matter of Rojas, 23 I&N Dec. 117 (BIA 2001), 2001 BIA LEXIS 11, holding that a criminal alien is subject to mandatory detention even he is not taken into custody immediately on release from criminal custody.
2 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 2 of 9 I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction is laid under 28 U.S.C (habeas corpus); 1331 (federal question), and 2201 et seq. (Declaratory Judgment Act), and 5 U.S.C. 702 et seq, (Administrative Procedure Act). 2. Mr. Vasquez is currently detained by Respondents at Los Fresnos, Texas. He resides in Harlingen, Texas, and the primary events in question occurred in Harlingen, Texas, both of which are within the jurisdiction of the Court. II. THE PARTIES 3. Petitioner Vasquez is a native of Mexico, who acquired United States citizenship through his United States citizen father. He also holds lawful permanent resident status in the United States. 4. Respondent Michael Pitts is the Field Office Director for Interior Enforcement of the San Antonio District of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ( ICE ). Respondent Michael Ochoa is the Deputy Chief Counsel of the Harlingen Office of ICE. Respondent Eric Holder, Jr., is the Attorney General of the United States. Each is sued in his official capacity only. The United States of America is also a named Respondent/Defendant. III. THE FACTS 5. Alberto Vasquez-Martinez is a native of Mexico, who entered the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 1979, when he was one year old, and has resided here ever since. He claims to have acquired U.S. citizenship through his United States citizen father, who was physically present in the United States for approximately twenty years prior to his birth, including nearly ten after the age of fourteen - double the statutory requirement of ten years, of which five were after the age of fourteen. 2 Petitioner s (sealed) Exhibit C, herein incorporated by reference. 2 8 U.S.C. 1401(g) (1978). 2
3 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 3 of 9 6. On or about August 22, 2005, Mr. Vasquez was given deferred adjudication, with ten years probation, for the offense of aggravated assault against his wife, Natasha Vasquez. Id. 7. On September 13, 2005, an NTA was prepared and served, charging Mr. Vasquez with deportability for having been convicted of a crime of domestic violence. At that time, he was released on his own recognizance. Id. Mr. Vasquez attended all of his hearings before the Immigration Judge. 8. On March 24, 2006, the Immigration Judge terminated proceedings without prejudice, to allow Mr. Vasquez to seek a Certificate of Citizenship. Unfortunately, Mr. Vasquez attempted to do so without the assistance of counsel. The supporting documentation submitted was therefore not prepared to the Government s satisfaction, and without interviewing his witnesses, as contemplated by 8 C.F.R (b), they denied his application, on August 29, Id. 9. A second NTA was therefore issued on October 20, 2009, and again, Mr. Vasquez was released on recognizance. A Master Calendar Appearance was scheduled for March 24, 2010, before Immigration Judge David Ayala. Id. 10. Mr. Vasquez then obtained counsel, who set about attempting to document his U.S. citizenship. In order to do so, in November, 2009, Mr. Vasquez requested that the original documents filed in support of his N-600 application for a Certificate of Citizenship be returned to him, (Form G-884), so that he could apply for a United States passport. This never occurred. 11. On November 4, 2009, counsel served on ICE a Motion to Terminate, based on his claim that the offense for which he was given deferred adjudication did not render him deportable, even if he were not a U.S. citizen. The motion was filed with the Immigration Court on December 10, ICE never responded to the motion. Petitioner s Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference. 3
4 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 4 of On February 10, 2010, Mr. Vasquez reported to ICE, pursuant to his Order of Release on Recognizance. At that time, he was taken into custody. The undersigned spoke with the Deportation Officer, who advised her that this was done at the request of the Office of Chief Counsel, which had conducted a file review, and determined that Mr. Vasquez was subject to mandatory detention. The undersigned had several conversations with attorneys from that office, and was informed that, after consultation with Defendant Ochoa, it had been decided that he would not be released, and that the Government would stand on Matter of Rojas, supra On February 12, 2010, counsel filed a motion with the Immigration Court, requesting a Joseph bond hearing. She discussed with Court personnel the fact that she would be asserting U.S. citizenship, and asked whether the Immigration Judge would want to hear the witnesses in person, or if not, how he handled such hearings. No-one knew. 14. Therefore, on February 18, 2010, counsel appeared for the bond hearing, with the necessary witnesses to demonstrate, virtually conclusively, that Mr. Vasquez is a United States citizen. Immigration Judge Achtsam stated at that time that he would not hear live witnesses, and that he would reschedule the case, to give counsel time to prepare their testimony by affidavit. He also asked counsel whether she agreed with the proposition that, if he found Mr. Vasquez to be a danger to the community, it would not even be necessary to reach the question of his citizenship. Counsel disagreed, stating that she considered that since citizenship was a jurisdictional fact, it had to be determined prior to reaching the traditional bond factors. The Judge asked that she file a brief on that issue by Monday, February 22, 2010, 3 The I-213 prepared after counsel had objected to ICE s detention also mentions that he reported five days late. However, counsel has never seen anyone detained for this reason. See, Petitioner s (sealed) Exhibit B, incorporated herein by reference. 4
5 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 5 of 9 and rescheduled the bond hearing for Tuesday, February 23, Counsel served and filed the requested brief, and affidavits, shortly before noon on February 22, Exhibit C. 14. On February 23, 2010, counsel returned to court, with the witnesses. At that time, the Immigration Judge stated that he had not had time to look at the brief, and would have to reschedule the hearing. Counsel requested that it be held the following morning, since she will be out of town from about noon, February 24, 2010, until the evening of March 3, The Judge was unavailable on February 24, so the hearing was rescheduled for March 4, Id. 15. As fate would have it, on February 8, 2010, two days before Mr. Vasquez was detained, his wife was laid off. Exh. D. Further, if he is not released soon, Mr. Vasquez will also lose his job. 16. In a similar case, the same Immigration Judge has ruled that he need not reach the issue of citizenship, if he finds that a detainee is a danger to the community, and the BIA has sustained this ruling. In that case, the person had to remain in detention for months. Petitioner s Exh. D, incorporated herein by reference. IV. APPLICABLE LAW A. MR. VASQUEZ IS NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY DETENTION WHERE HE WAS NOT DETAINED WHEN HE WAS RELEASED FROM CRIMINAL CUSTODY, PARTICULARLY GIVEN THAT HE WAS RELEASED ON RECOGNIZANCE BY ICE ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS The question of whether 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1) applies to aliens who were not placed under mandatory detention at the time they were released from criminal custody has generated a great deal of litigation. To the best of counsel s knowledge and belief, every district court, but one, that has considered the issue has concluded that 1226(c)(1) does not apply in such circumstances. The mandatory detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1) apply 4 Counsel is giving a CLE seminar in Houston on February 25, 2010, and has oral argument in New Orleans on March 3,
6 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 6 of 9 when two conditions are fulfilled. First, the individual must be detained WHEN released from criminal custody, and second, as a result of the criminal conviction, the individual must be removable, i.e., at a minimum, s/he must be an alien. As Petitioner has attempted to demonstrate before the Immigration Judge, he is not an alien. Moreover, the WHEN RELEASED language in 1226(c) is abundantly clear and unambiguous, and means that the DHS must detain a person when released from the criminal custody. Respondents misinterpret this as meaning anytime after release. See, Matter of Rojas, supra. Numerous courts have rejected this interpretation, including Waffi v. Loiselle, 527 F.Supp.2d 480 (E.D.Va. 2007), and Quezada-Bucio v. Ridge, 317 F.Supp.2d 1221 (E.D.Wa. 2004). 5 To the best of counsel s knowledge and belief, the only decision to the contrary is Sulayao v. Shanahan, (S.D.N.Y. 2009), 2009 WL Although the petitioner in the instant case was released in August, 2005, mandatory detention does not apply to him since he was not detained immediately after his release from criminal custody. Detention, under the statute, is required "when the alien is released, without regard to whether the alien is released on parole, supervised release, or probation, and without regard to whether the alien may be arrested or imprisoned again for the same offense." 1226(c)(1). The "when released" language clearly indicates that detention is not required of an individual who was not in criminal custody when arrested by the DHS. The petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment but was not taken into custody by the DHS at the time he was released from criminal custody, but rather was detained by the DHS more than four years after his release. See, Waffi v. Loiselle, supra, and Quezada-Bucio v. Ridge, supra. In neither case did the Government appeal the District Court 5 See also dissenting opinion of BIA member Rosenberg in Matter of Rojas, 23 I&N Dec. 117 (BIA 2001). 6
7 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 7 of 9 decision to the Court of Appeals, notwithstanding that, as published decisions, they carry a certain persuasive value. B. MR. VASQUEZ IS NOT AN ALIEN AND IS THEREFORE IMMUNE FROM DETENTION BY RESPONDENTS Alternatively, Mr. Vasquez challenges the absence of any procedure by which he can obtain a prompt determination in Immigration Court of whether ICE and the EOIR even have jurisdiction over his person. See, Flores-Torres v. Mukasey 548 F.3d 708,709 (9 th Cir. 2008): ICE claims it has the authority to [detain Petitioner] under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which permits the detention of an alien who is in removal proceedings. Torres, however, contends that he is not an alien, that he became a United States citizen at the age of seventeen when his mother was naturalized, and that ICE is therefore without authority to detain him. We reverse the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of Torres's habeas petition challenging his continued confinement, and remand for a determination whether he is a citizen and thus immune from detention under the INA. Here, Mr. Vasquez submitted an extensive brief to the Immigration Judge, questioning his jurisdiction. Exh. D. However, he will have been detained for over three weeks, before he can even hope that the IJ will issue a ruling. And, given: 1) the IJ s refusal to hear live testimony from Mr. Vasquez witnesses, 2) his prior determination that a bond hearing is not a proper forum to decide a contested issue of United States citizenship, Exh. E, at p.4, and 3) the fact that the BIA previously upheld that determination, it is highly unlikely that the IJ will issue a favorable ruling. V. CAUSES OF ACTION A. HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner first seeks a writ of habeas corpus, releasing him from the unlawful and unconstitutional custody imposed by Respondents, for 1) detaining him years after he was released from criminal custody, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1), and 2) failing to provide him with a procedure for promptly determining whether the Respondents even have jurisdiction over his person, given his claim 7
8 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 8 of 9 that he is a United States citizen, and not an alien, as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1001(a)(3): The term alien means any person not a citizen or national of the United States. B. INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF Petitioner further seeks injunctive, and corresponding declaratory relief, on his claim that it is unconstitutional for Defendants to detain him, allegedly pursuant to the mandatory detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1), without providing him a prompt and effective forum for determining whether he is an alien, as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1001(a)(3). WHEREFORE, it is urged that the Court issue a temporary restraining order, and thereafter, a preliminary injunction, restraining and enjoining Respondents from not immediately releasing Mr. Vasquez, pending determination of his claim to United States citizenship. Respectfully Submitted, s/ Lisa S. Brodyaga Attorney at Law Landrum Park Road Federal Id: 1178 San Benito, TX Texas State Bar: (956) (956) (fax) VERIFICATION I, Lisa S. Brodyaga, hereby certify that I am familiar with the facts of the case as stated above, and that they are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. s/ Lisa S. Brodyaga CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION The undersigned has consulted with Victor Rodriguez, AUSA, regarding his availability for a hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order. Mr. Rodriguez has stated that he will be available on March 5, 8, 9, and 10, 2010, and if necessary, during the afternoon of March 4, The undersigned is also 8
9 Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 9 of 9 available on all of these dates. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a courtesy copy of the foregoing, with Exhibits A through E, were electronically served on Victor Rodriguez, AUSA, this 23 rd day of February, s/ Lisa S. Brodyaga 9
Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/01/2009 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:09-cv-00001 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/01/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION CRISTOVAL SILVA-TREVINO, ) Petitioner, ) ) v.
More informationCase 1:07-cv Document 13 Filed in TXSD on 10/21/07 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-00145 Document 13 Filed in TXSD on 10/21/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION FELICITAS CARREON-MOCTEZUMA, ) OSWALDO BYIRINGIRO
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 15
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Bassam Yusuf KHOURY; Alvin RODRIGUEZ MOYA; Pablo CARRERA ZAVALA, on behalf of themselves
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JOHN ASHCROFT, as Attorney General of the ) United States; TOM RIDGE, as Secretary of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. v. No. XX-XX-XXX PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Petitioner, v. No. XX-XX-XXX MICHAEL J. PITTS, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, U.S.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No Civ (Altonaga/Simonton)
Case 1:14-cv-20308-CMA Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2014 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 14-20308 Civ (Altonaga/Simonton) John Doe I, and John
More informationPRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano
PRACTICE ADVISORY April 21, 2011 Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano This advisory concerns the Ninth Circuit s recent decision in Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KUAN JIANG, , Petitioner, -v- 15-CV-48-JTC
Jiang v. Holder et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KUAN JIANG, 046-852-729, Petitioner, -v- 15-CV-48-JTC ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States,
More informationCase 2:12-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 11/14/12 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-000-mjp Document Filed // Page of 0 ELTON CASTILLO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CASE NO. C-0-MJP-MAT v. Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION WITH AMENDMENT ICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
-PJK Cuello v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Field Office Director of Doc. 10 Roberto Mendoza Cuello, Jr. Petitioner, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN
More informationCase 2:06-cv MJP Document 98-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-01411-MJP Document 98-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 5 Name#1 Counsel for Respondent(s Chief Counsel Law Firm (If Applicable Name #2 Address 1 Deputy Chief Counsel Address 2 Name #3 Assistant
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Excerpted from AILA's Immigration Litigation Toolbox, th Ed. ( 0, American Immigration Lawyers Association), and distributed with permission. VIKRAM BADRINATH, P.C. 00 North Stone Avenue, Suite 0 Tucson,
More informationCase 1:18-cv KBF Document 17 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:18-cv-00236-KBF Document 17 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAVIDATH LAWRENCE RAGBIR, Petitioner, No. 18 Civ. 236 (KBF) ECF Case - against -
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Bautista v. Sabol et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT A. BAUTISTA, : No. 3:11cv1611 Petitioner : : (Judge Munley) v. : : MARY E. SABOL, WARDEN,
More informationCase 1:07-cv RGS Document 24 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:07-cv-10471-RGS Document 24 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) NOLBERTA AGUILAR, et al., ) ) Petitioners and Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES
More informationv. 08-CV-0534(Sr) REPORT, RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER This matter was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ERROL BARRINGTON SCARLETT, A35-899-292 Petitioner, v. 08-CV-0534(Sr) THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION &
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00192 Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION LAURA MONTERROSA-FLORES, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-192
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
DISTRICT COURT, TELLER COUNTY, COLORADO 101 W. Bennett Avenue, Cripple Creek, Colorado 80813 Plaintiff: LEONARDO CANSECO SALINAS, v. Defendant: JASON MIKESELL, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Teller
More informationImmigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal
Immigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal Immigration Policy Reforms On Nov. 20, 2014, President Obama announced a series of reforms modifying immigration policy: 1. Expanding deferred action for certain
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Marc Van Der Hout, CA SBN 0 Judah Lakin, CA SBN 00 Amalia Wille, CA SBN Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale LLP 0 Sutter Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Tel:
More informationNo CHRISTOPHER DONELAN, SHERIFF OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL., Respondents. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
No. 17-923 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MARK ANTHONY REID, V. Petitioner, CHRISTOPHER DONELAN, SHERIFF OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 18, 2016 Decided: July 29, 2016) Docket No.
0 cv Guerra v. Shanahan et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: February 1, 01 Decided: July, 01) Docket No. 1 0 cv DEYLI NOE GUERRA, AKA DEYLI NOE GUERRA
More informationMOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Case 4:15-cr-00001-BSM Document 81 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 4:15CR00001-1 BSM ) MICHAEL A. MAGGIO
More informationORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining
DISTRICT COURT, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 DATE FILED: March 19, 2018 11:58 PM CASE NUMBER: 2018CV30549 Plaintiffs: Saul Cisneros, Rut Noemi Chavez Rodriguez,
More informationCase 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 6:16-cv-01424 Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) Daniel Acosta Sarmiento ) A 098 285 863 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. (Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2008) Docket No ag
05-4614-ag Grant v. DHS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 (Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2008) Docket No. 05-4614-ag OTIS GRANT, Petitioner, UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 HOLLY S. COOPER, CSB # Law Office of Holly S. Cooper P.O. Box Davis, CA (0-00 Fax (0-0 CARTER C. WHITE, CSB # 1 Attorney at Law P.O. Box 0 Davis, CA (0-0 Fax (0 - Carter.White@gmail.com Counsel for Petitioner,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-02761 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EMIL J. SANTOS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case
More informationIn the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Civil Action No. LUIS QUEZADA, Plaintiff, v. TED MINK, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Jefferson County, Colorado Defendant.
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:18-cv-10225 Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) LILIAN PAHOLA CALDERON JIMENEZ, ) ) Civ. No. Petitioner, ) ) ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF KIRSTJEN
More informationBond/Custody. I. Overview. A. Application Before an Immigration Judge. B. Time. C. Subsequent Hearing. D. While a Bond Appeal is Pending
Bond/Custody I. Overview A. Application Before an Immigration Judge B. Time C. Subsequent Hearing D. While a Bond Appeal is Pending E. Non-Mandatory Custody Aliens F. Mandatory Custody Aliens G. An Immigration
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-00-EJD Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION BERTHA MEJIA ESPINOZA, CASE NO. :-cv-00 EJD v. Petitioner(s), TIMOTHY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED], Petitioner, v. KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland
More informationMEMORANDUM. Sheriffs, Undersheriffs, Jail Administrators. Compliance with federal detainer warrants. Date February 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM To re Sheriffs, Undersheriffs, Jail Administrators Compliance with federal detainer warrants Date February 14, 2017 From Thomas Mitchell, NYSSA Counsel Introduction At the 2017 Sheriffs Winter
More informationMOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT S RELEASE ON BOND OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, RELEASE ON HIS OWN RECOGNIZANCE
Law student intern appearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1292.1(a(2 Capital Area Immigrants Rights Coalition 1612 K Street NW, Suite 204 Washington, DC 20006 (202 331-3320 DETAINED Staff Attorney Capital Area
More informationMIDWIFE BIRTHS, DELAYED BIRTH CERTIFICATES, AND FEDERAL COURT REMEDIES FOR REFUSAL TO RECOGNIZE ONE S UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP
The University of Texas School of Law Continuing Legal Education 512-475-6700 www.utcle.org Presented: th 35 ANNUAL IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY LAW October 20-21, 2011 Austin, Texas MIDWIFE BIRTHS, DELAYED
More informationCase 3:07-cv WHA Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case 3:07-cv-04759-WHA Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 IRAJ SHAHROK, ESQ. (CSB #49776) Iraj Shahrok Law Offices 572 Ralston Avenue Belmont, CA 94002 (650) 591-9604 (650) 591-6076 (Fax) Attorney
More informationNUTS AND BOLTS OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN FEDERAL COURT
NUTS AND BOLTS OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN FEDERAL COURT February 21, 2018 Raha Jorjani Brad Banias Zachary Nightingale (moderator) Presented by: AILA Federal Court Litigation Section
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Practitioners representing detained immigrant and refugee youth
CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Foundation 256 S. OCCIDENTAL BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90057 Telephone: (213) 388-8693 Facsimile: (213) 386-9484, ext. 309 http://www.centerforhumanrights.org
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:
La Reynaga Quintero v. Asher et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 ADONIS LA REYNAGA QUINTERO, CASE NO. C- MJP v. Petitioner, RECOMMENDATION NATHALIE R. ASHER,
More informationInterim Guidance on Flores v. Sessions
Interim Guidance on Flores v. Sessions I. Background Flores is a lawsuit brought by unaccompanied alien children to enforce Paragraph 24A of the Flores Settlement Agreement. Paragraph 24A states: A minor
More informationPLAINTIFF S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION HUMBERTO G PLAINTIFF, v. C.A. B-12-155 JOHN F. KERRY United States Secretary of State, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 1:18-cv EGS Document 29 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-01853-EGS Document 29 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRACE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-01853-EGS JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD
More informationprovide petitioner certain information at 10:00 a.m. on February
Case 1:18-cv-10225-MLW Document 17 Filed 02/15/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LILIAN PAHOLA CALDERON JIMENEZ, Petitioner, V. C.A. No. 18-10225-MLW KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-3396 & 08-1452 JESUS LAGUNAS-SALGADO, v. Petitioner, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Petitions
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 11-3582 HUSNI MOH D ALI EL-GAZAWY, v. Petitioner, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. On Petition for
More informationAsylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES October 2018 Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know Asylum Definition: An applicant for asylum has the burden to demonstrate that he or she is eligible
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Antonio de Jesus MARTINEZ and Vivian MARTINEZ, v. Plaintiffs-Petitioners, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; THOMAS HOMAN,
More informationOVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS
OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS A Guide for Community Members & Advocates By Em Puhl The immigration system is very complex and opaque, containing many intricate moving parts. Most decisions that result
More informationCase 2:18-cv MJP Document 102 Filed 03/06/19 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 YOLANY PADILLA, et al., CASE NO. C- MJP v. Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING CERTIFICATION
More informationBond Hearings for Immigrants Subject to Prolonged Immigration Detention in the Ninth Circuit
Bond Hearings for Immigrants Subject to Prolonged Immigration Detention in the Ninth Circuit Michael Kaufman, ACLU of Southern California Michael Tan, ACLU Immigrants Rights Project December 2015 This
More informationIn re Samuel JOSEPH, Respondent
In re Samuel JOSEPH, Respondent File A90 562 326 - York Decided May 28, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) For purposes of determining
More informationCase 1:17-cv JB-KBM Document 14 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-01258-JB-KBM Document 14 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 13 DANIEL E. CORIZ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Petitioner, No. 1:17-CV-01258 JB/KBM v. VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,
More informationCase: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/23/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:11-cv-01991 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/23/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMOS REVELIS, and ) MARCEL MAAS (A077 644 072), ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS JUYEL AHMED, ) Special Proceeding No. 00-0101A ) Applicant, ) ) vs. ) ORDER GRANTING ) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER MAJOR IGNACIO
More informationC. The Loss of Authority Cases Are Inapplicable to Determining the Scope of Mandatory Detention Under Section 1226(c) CONCLUSION...
QUESTION PRESENTED These cases concern the proper construction of the mandatory detention provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Title 8 U.S.C. Section 1226(c). Section 1226(c) is an exception
More informationCase 1:17-cr DLI Document 28 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 183
Case 117-cr-00418-DLI Document 28 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID # 183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ x UNITED
More informationCase 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document Filed 09/12/18 PageID.3439 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:18-cv-00428-DMS-MDD Document 220-1 Filed 09/12/18 PageID.3439 Page 1 of 7 Plan to address the asylum claims of class-member parents and children who are physically present in the United States The
More informationCase 3:17-mc G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:17-mc-00016-G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Petitioner, v.
More information2:17-cv MAG-DRG Doc # 32 Filed 06/22/17 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 497 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:17-cv-11910-MAG-DRG Doc # 32 Filed 06/22/17 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 497 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION USAMA J. HAMAMA, et al., vs. Petitioners, Case No. 17-cv-11910
More informationBIA and Circuit Court Appeals Pro Bono Immigration Training San Francisco, CA August 8, 2013
BIA and Circuit Court Appeals Pro Bono Immigration Training San Francisco, CA August 8, 2013 Holly S. Cooper University of California, Davis Davis, CA Karen T. Grisez Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 17-2044 Carlos Caballero-Martinez lllllllllllllllllllllpetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllrespondent
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:18-cv-01456 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAPHIA WILLIAMS, Individually and on ) Behalf
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Matt Adams Glenda Aldana Madrid NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ( - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE John DOE, John DOE
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. DAOHUA YU, A Petitioner,
RESTRICTED Case: 11-70987, 08/13/2012, ID: 8285939, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 1 of 21 No. 11-70987 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAOHUA YU, A099-717-691 Petitioner, v. ERIC H.
More informationCase 1:17-cv RB-KRS Document 1 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-00684-RB-KRS Document 1 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DAVID TORTALITA, Petitioner vs. TODD GEISEN, CAPTAIN/WARDEN Bureau of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-00-dcb Document Filed 0// Page of MICHAEL G. RANKIN City Attorney Michael W.L. McCrory Principal Assistant City Attorney P.O. Box Tucson, AZ - Telephone: (0 - State Bar PCC No. Attorneys for
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, AKA Arturo Ramirez, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-71788 Agency No. A095-733-635
More informationCase 1:07-cv RGS Document 58 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.
Case 1:07-cv-10471-RGS Document 58 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-10471-RGS NOLBERTA AQUILAR, et al. v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION
More informationMichael Bumbury v. Atty Gen USA
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-2-2010 Michael Bumbury v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-2014 Follow
More informationCase 2:85-cv DMG-AGR Document 318 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:10950
Case 2:85-cv-04544-DMG-AGR Document 318 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:10950 Title Jenny L. Flores, et al. v. Loretta E. Lynch, et al. Page 1 of 8 Present: The Honorable KANE TIEN Deputy Clerk DOLLY
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULLTEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0176p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT YOUNG HEE KWAK, Petitioner, X v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION ) Sassan PARINEJAD and Carlos Andre CALCANO ) individually and on behalf of all similarly situated persons ) and the CATHOLIC
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/29/15 In re Christian H. CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
Lo, Ousseynou v. Gonzales, Alberto Doc. 20 NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 No. 06-3336 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago,
More informationAPPENDIX F INSTRUCTIONS
APPENDIX F COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING RELIEF FROM FINAL FELONY CONVICTION UNDER CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.07 INSTRUCTIONS 1. You must
More informationCertificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions
Certificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions 1. You must be a resident of Fresno County to file a certificate of rehabilitation in Fresno County. However, the offense may have occurred
More informationThese materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12, 2017.
Linda Kenepaske Law Offices of Linda Kenepaske, PLLC 17 Battery Place, Suite 1226 These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12,
More informationPETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1
9-701. Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [For use with District Court Criminal Rule 5-802 NMRA] STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT, (Full name of prisoner) Petitioner, v., (Name of warden,
More information(617) ext. 8 (tel) INSTANT MOTION TO REOPEN (617) (fax)
Trina Realmuto Kaitlin Konkel, Student Extern DETAINED National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild 14 Beacon Street, Suite 602 DEPORTATION STAYED BY THE BIA Boston, MA 02108 PENDING ADJUDICATION
More informationFlor Bermudez, Esq. Transgender Law Center P.O. Box Oakland, CA (510)
Flor Bermudez, Esq. Transgender Law Center P.O. Box 70976 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 380-8229 DETAINED UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW BOARD OF IMMGRATION APPEALS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 2008 kug 25 P 4: 32
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 2008 kug 25 P 4: 32 DR. SAM1 AL-ARIAN Petitioner, MICHAEL MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General; MICHAEL CHERTOFF,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0331p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AMWAR I. SAQR, v. Petitioner, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney
More informationMatter of Rudolf STRYDOM, Respondent
Matter of Rudolf STRYDOM, Respondent Decided May 24, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A conviction under section 21-3843(a)(1) of the
More informationCAUSE NO. * STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. vs. * JUDICIAL DISTRICT *DEFENDANT NAME GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. * STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs. * JUDICIAL DISTRICT *DEFENDANT NAME GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SEEKING BAIL REDUCTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:14-cv-06459 Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVINO WATSON, v. Plaintiff, JUAN ESTRADA, MICHAEL ORTIZ,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 09-00296-02-CR-W-FJG ) ERIC BURKITT, ) Defendant. )
More informationCase 2:16-cv MJP Document 22 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE B.I.C., Petitioner, v. NATHALIE R. ASHER, et al., Respondents. Case No. C--MJP ORDER
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/28/16 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:16-cv-03745 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) LUCAS LOMAS, ) CARLOS EALGIN, ) On behalf
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Lawrence S. Lustberg Jonathan M. Manes GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 596-4500 Counsel of Record for the Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY GARFIELD
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
Rama M. Taib* Adam N. Crandell* Stephen Brown* Fariha Quasem* Maureen A. Sweeney, Supervising Attorney University of Maryland School of Law Immigration Clinic 500 W. Baltimore Street, Suite 360 Baltimore,
More informationCase 1:17-cv JCH-KRS Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-00691-JCH-KRS Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DAMIAN GARCIA, Petitioner vs. TODD GEISEN, CAPTAIN/WARDEN Bureau of
More informationCase: 2:18-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case: 2:18-cv-00760-ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ISSE ABDI ALI WARSAN HASSAN DIRIYE Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-760
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE
Christopher R. Macaraeg, Esq. Law Offices of Christopher R, Macaraeg 424 F Street, Suite C San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619 235-2525 Fax: (619 235-9510 DETAINED ALIEN UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-cjc-gjs Document 0 Filed 0 Page of Page ID #: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 0 NAK KIM CHHOEUN AND MONY NETH, individually and on behalf of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv DLG.
Case: 14-11084 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11084 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-22737-DLG AARON CAMACHO
More informationAMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION DHS ANNOUNCES UNPRECEDENTED EXPANSION OF EXPEDITED REMOVAL TO THE INTERIOR
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 August 13, 2004 DHS ANNOUNCES UNPRECEDENTED EXPANSION OF EXPEDITED REMOVAL TO THE INTERIOR By Mary Kenney The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
More informationn a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild
n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild PRACTICE ADVISORY: SAMPLE CARACHURI-ROSENDO MOTIONS June 21, 2010 By Simon Craven, Trina Realmuto and Dan Kesselbrenner 1 Prior to
More informationCase 1:16-cv RB-WPL Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:16-cv-01404-RB-WPL Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ALAN FRAGUA, Petitioner vs. AL CASAMENTO, DIRECTOR Sandoval County Detention
More informationFINAL JUDGMENT OF INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING (AFTER NOTICE)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA, Petitioner, and Case No.: Division:, Respondent. FINAL JUDGMENT OF INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING (AFTER NOTICE) The
More information