Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

Transcription

1 CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGION Environmental Justice Demographic Profile January 2016

2 Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 OBJECTIVES... 4 DEFINITIONS... 4 Minority Populations... 4 Low-Income Population... 4 Other Populations... 5 CENSUS DATA and GIS... 5 REGIONAL PROFILE DATA TABLES... 5 Data Notes... 5 Observations... 7 GIS MAP PROFILES... 8 Census Data and Regional Thresholds... 8 Data Notes... 9 Observations Table 1. Population by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: Table 2. Poverty Statistics: Table 3. Poverty Statistics by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: Table 4. Median Household Income by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin of Householder: Table 5. Poverty Rate for the Population Age 65 and Over: Table 6. Poverty Rate for Persons with a Disability: Table 7. Households with No Vehicle: Table 8. Persons with Limited English Proficiency: Table 9. Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English, Persons Age 5 Years and Over: Table 10. Common Languages Other Than English Spoken in the Central Puget Sound: Source: 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C16001Table 10. Common Languages Other Than English Spoken in the Central Puget Sound: Map 1. Minority Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 3. American Indian/Alaskan Native Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 4. Asian/Pacific Islander Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 5. Hispanic/Latino Population, Central Puget Sound: Appendix A. DATA SOURCES Appendix B. POVERTY THRESHOLDS IN Appendix C POVERTY FACTORS Appendix D. ALTERNATIVE DATA SOURCES January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

3 INTRODUCTION Since the mid-1990s, a renewed emphasis on environmental justice has become an integral part of the transportation planning process for urban regions in the United States. The concept of environmental justice is derived from Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of and other civil rights statutes, and was first put forth as a national policy goal by presidential Executive Order 12898, issued in 1994, which directs each federal agency to make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations. 2 The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) responded to the directive with its DOT Order to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations in The order laid out the following environmental justice principles to be integrated into federal transportation programs, policies, and activities: To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority and low-income populations. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision-making process. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations. The DOT has issued an updated internal Order in May DOT Order 5610(a) continues to be a key component of the Department s strategy to promote the principles of environmental justice in all Departmental programs, policies, and activities. With this guidance, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) renewed their commitments to ensure that environmental justice is carried out in the programs and strategies they fund including the activities of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). 4 The FHWA has specifically directed MPOs to: Enhance their analytical capabilities to ensure that their long-range transportation plan and their transportation improvement program comply with Title VI. Identify residential, employment, and transportation patterns of low-income and minority populations so that their needs can be identified and addressed, and the benefits and burdens of transportation investments can be fairly distributed. Evaluate and where necessary improve their public involvement processes to eliminate participation barriers and engage minority and low-income populations in transportation decisionmaking. 1 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. 2 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low- Income Populations, February DOT Order to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, April FHWA Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, December 1998; and FHWA and FTA Memorandum Implementing Title VI Requirements in Metropolitan and Statewide Planning, October January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

4 The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization, as well as the state designated regional transportation planning organization, for the central Puget Sound region. Under these mandates, the PSRC is responsible for developing and regularly updating the region s long-range transportation plan, Transportation , as well as distributing federal transportation funds to local projects through its transportation improvement program. In 2003, the PSRC developed the baseline demographic profile as an initial step toward better integrating environmental justice into its transportation work program 6. That profile has now been updated to present key demographic data describing the central Puget Sound region and identify population groups and communities to be considered for subsequent environmental justice analyses and activities. OBJECTIVES The PSRC set out to meet two primary objectives in preparing this environmental justice demographic profile: Compile key demographic data on minority and low-income populations in the central Puget Sound region, as well as other populations of interest, for environmental justice consideration in conducting regional transportation, economic development, and growth management planning and program activities and public outreach. Identify the locations of communities within the region with significant minority and low-income populations in order to facilitate and enhance environmental justice analyses, outreach, and other planning activities. DEFINITIONS Executive Order 12898, and the DOT, FHWA, and FTA orders on environmental justice address persons belonging to any of the following groups: Minority Populations Black - a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. American Indian and Alaskan Native - a person having origins in any of the original people of North America and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition. Asian - a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands. Hispanic - a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Low-Income Population Low-Income - a person whose household income (or in the case of a community or group, whose median household income) is at or below the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5 Transportation 2040: Toward a Sustainable Transportation System, Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle WA, May 2010, 6 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile, Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle WA, October 2003, January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

5 (HHS) poverty guidelines. States and localities may, however, adopt a higher threshold for lowincome as long as the higher threshold is not selectively implemented and is inclusive of all persons at or below the HHS poverty guidelines. Other Populations While the various orders on environmental justice require consideration of only minority and low-income populations as defined above, discussions of other populations protected by Title VI and related nondiscrimination statutes - such as the elderly, disabled, etc. - are encouraged in addressing environmental justice and Title VI in federally sponsored transportation programs, policies, and activities. CENSUS DATA and GIS The PSRC relied upon data products from the the American Community Survey namely the 2014 ACS 1-year, ACS 5-year, and 2014 ACS Public Use Microdata Sample data sets - to develop its baseline demographic profile (see Appendix A.) Geographic information systems (GIS) applications were also utilized to map graphic representations of the data. REGIONAL PROFILE DATA TABLES Drawing from the American Community Survey, the PSRC compiled data tables of key demographic statistics on the region s minority and low-income populations and other populations and characteristics of interest for environmental justice consideration. The data tables report statistics for the central Puget Sound region as a whole as well as each of its four counties - King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish. Table 1. Population by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: 2014 Table 2. Poverty Statistics: 2014 Table 3. Poverty Rates by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: Table 4. Median Household Income by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin of Householder: 2014 Table 5. Poverty Rate for the Population Age 65 and Over: 2014 Table 6. Poverty Rate for Persons with a Disability: 2014 Table 7. Households with No Vehicle: 2014 Table 8. Persons with Limited English Proficiency: 2014 Table 9. Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English: Table 10. Common Languages Other Than English Spoken in the Central Puget Sound: 2014 Data Notes Race The federal race classification categories Asian alone and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone were combined in the regional profile data tables, where possible, as Asian/Pacific Islander alone. In the American Community Survey, the Some other race category includes all responses to the race question other than White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaskan Native, Asian, or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. Write-in responses such as multiracial, mixed, or interracial (where the multiple races were not identified), or a Hispanic/Latino group such as Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Cuban, are included in the Some other race category. In the American Community Survey, the Two or more races category includes responses to the race question involving two or more combinations of White, Black or African American, American Indian and January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

6 Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and Some other race, including write-in responses. Hispanic/Latino The American Community Survey considers Hispanic/Latino origin as an ethnic characteristic, separate from race. A person who identified their origin as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino may be of any race, including White. Total Minority The term total minority represents the union between - not the sum of minority race populations and the Hispanic/Latino population, and includes White persons of Hispanic/Latino origin. Race Hispanic/ Latino White / Non-Hispanic White / Hispanic Non-White / Non-Hispanic Non-White / Hispanic Poverty Status There are two slightly different versions of the federal poverty measure: poverty thresholds and poverty guidelines. The poverty thresholds are the original version of the federal poverty measure, first developed by the Social Security Administration (SSA), and updated each year by the Census Bureau. The poverty guidelines are a simplified version of the poverty thresholds, issued each year in the Federal Register by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 7. The 2014 poverty data reported in the regional profile tables and utilized in the GIS map profile of the region s low-income population were derived using the Census Bureau s poverty thresholds. Poverty thresholds for families and unrelated individuals are represented by a matrix of income thresholds based on the composition and size of a family unit cross-classified by the presence and number of family members under 18 years old. Because the income questions specify a period covering the last 12 months, the appropriate poverty thresholds are determined by multiplying the base-year poverty thresholds (1982) (see Appendix B) by the average of the monthly inflation factors for the 12 months preceding the data collection (see Appendix C). For example, the poverty threshold in 2010 for a family of four with two children, interviewed in January 2010 was $23,614. All household members related by birth, marriage, or adoption are included in the determination of a family s poverty status. Unrelated individuals in the same household are considered separately. Unrelated individuals and 2-person families are further differentiated by whether the reference person is under 65 years or 65 years and over. Poverty thresholds are revised annually to allow for changes in the cost of living as reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U). Poverty thresholds are the same for all parts of the country they are not adjusted for regional, state, or local variations in the cost of living. Beginning in 2006, the population in group quarters (GQ) is included in the ACS. Median Household Income - The 2014 median household incomes reported for the central Puget Sound region (in Table 4) are for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Metro Area which does not include Kitsap County. There is no census entity that encompasses the four Central Puget Sound counties and those counties alone and thus no median figure is available. Median household income for the Asian/Pacific Islander only category cannot be tabulated from median household income values for the Asian alone and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone categories. 7 See The 2012 HHS Poverty Guidelines at January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

7 Disability Status In the 2014 American Community Survey, disability was defined as: The existence of the following long-lasting conditions: a) Sensory disability - blindness, deafness, or a severe vision or hearing impairment b) Physical disability a condition that substantially limits one or more basic physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying; or The existence of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6 months or more that made it difficult to perform the following activities: a) Mental disability - learning, remembering, or concentrating b) Self-care disability - dressing, bathing, or getting around inside the home c) Go outside home disability - going outside the home alone to shop or visit a doctor s office d) Employment disability - working at a job or business Individuals were classified as having a disability if they belonged to the civilian noninstitutionalized population and they were: 5 years and over and had a sensory, physical, mental, or self-care disability; they were 16 years and over and had a go outside home disability, and/or; they were 16 to 64 years old and had an employment disability. Limited English Proficiency In the 2014 American Community Survey, the English proficiency question was asked of a sample of the population who reported that they spoke a language other than, or in addition to, English at home. Respondents were asked to rate their ability to speak English in one of the following categories: Very well, Well, Not well, or Not at all. The PSRC classified persons as being limited English proficient if they responded with any answer other than Very well. Persons who spoke only English at home were assumed to be English proficient. Language proficiency was tabulated for the population age 5 and over. Observations Tables 1 and 2 provide essential statistics on the region s minority and low-income populations. Minorities, or non-white persons including White persons of Hispanic/Latino origin, comprised 33.6 percent of the region s total population in Minorities comprised the largest share of the population in King County (37.7 percent), followed by Pierce County (31.7 percent), Snohomish County (28.1 percent), and Kitsap County (22.3 percent), Blacks/African Americans constituted 5.3 percent of the region s total population, American Indians/Alaskan Natives 0.9 percent, Asians/Pacific Islanders 12.8 percent. Hispanics or Latinos (which can be of any race) were 9.5 percent of the population. In 2014, the region-wide poverty rate was 11.3 percent. The poverty rate was highest in Pierce County (12.9 percent) and lowest in Snohomish County (9.7 percent.) Table 2 also reports statistics for the percentage of the region s population below 150 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level in These statistics indicate that there are substantial numbers of families and individuals in the region whose incomes are above the federal poverty level, but within a range that may still be considered lower income, particularly when taking into account the cost of living in the central Puget Sound region. Federal poverty thresholds are not adjusted for regional, state, and local variations in the cost of living, which is higher in the central Puget Sound region relative to most other areas of the United States on average because of higher local housing and transportation costs. Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the relationship between minority and low-income populations. Poverty rates are higher, and median household incomes generally lower, for minority populations compared to the White population or total population overall. While the poverty rates for the Asian population is very similar to that of the total population, for other racial and ethnic groups it can be more than double. (The total January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

8 population for whom poverty is determined is different between this table and Table 2 because the data are drawn from different ACS series: 5-year versus 1-year respectively. See Data Notes below for more details.) Table 4 shows the median household income by race and ethnicity as well as the ratio of those median incomes to that of all households. Tables 5 and 6 present demographic statistics, including poverty rates, for the region s elderly and disabled populations. The disabled population is shown to have significantly higher rates of poverty than the total population overall, whereas poverty rates for the elderly population are significantly lower. Table 7 compares vehicle non-availability among household types. Households with a minority householder, low-income households, households with an elderly householder, and households with one or more disabled persons are more likely to have no vehicle available than the average household in the region. These data indicate that the transportation, and especially public transit, needs of such households are significantly different from the average household. Finally, Tables 8 and 9 present statistics on persons with limited English proficiency and common languages other than English spoken in the central Puget Sound region. This information is intended to support the development of the public outreach and involvement component of the PSRC s environmental justice program. GIS MAP PROFILES In addition to compiling the regional profile data tables described above, the PSRC utilized its geographic information systems (GIS) applications to map the distributions of minority and low income populations across the region to identify geographic areas and communities with substantial minority and low-income populations. Map 1. Minority Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 2. Black/African American Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 3. American Indian/Alaskan Native Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 4. Asian/Pacific Islander Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 5. Hispanic/Latino Population, Central Puget Sound: Map 6. Low-Income Population, Central Puget Sound: Census Data and Regional Thresholds The PSRC again drew from 2010 U.S. Census and American Community Survey data to develop its environmental justice GIS map profiles. The minority population profile maps utilized census tract-level race and Hispanic/Latino origin data from the American Community Survey 5-year data set, and the low-income population profile map utilized census tract-level poverty status data from the same data set (see Appendix A.) The PSRC established a set of regional population thresholds to determine whether a census blockgroup or census tract had a regionally significant minority or low-income population concentration. For example, in Map 1 Minority Population, Central Puget Sound: 2010, census blocks with a minority population share equal to or greater than the regional threshold 31.2 percent of total population - are shaded in January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

9 orange, whereas census blocks with a minority population share less than the regional threshold are shaded in blue. Regional Minority and Low-Income Population Thresholds Population group Total minority Black/African American American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino Low-income Regional threshold 33.6 percent of total population 10.0 percent of total population 10.0 percent of total population 10.0 percent of total population 10.0 percent of total population 11.6 percent of total population The total minority and low-income regional thresholds were calculated based on the percentage of the region s total population comprised by, respectively, minorities and persons below the federal poverty level (see Tables 1 and 2.) The regional thresholds for the Black/African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic/Latino population groups were set across the board at 10 percent. The PSRC determined that the 10 percent threshold level allowed for effective identification of and differentiation between the residential patterns of each minority population group across the region. The use of a consistent threshold level across minority groups further facilitates comparison of the relative size of each population. Data Notes Maps 1 to 5 do not depict values for census blocks with a population of less than 10 persons. Map 1 illustrates the distribution of the minority population (non-white persons including White persons of Hispanic/Latino origin) across the central Puget Sound region, and identifies geographic areas and communities with a regionally significant minority population. Census blocks with a minority population share equal to or greater than the regional threshold 31.2 percent of total population - are shaded in orange, whereas census blocks with a minority population share less than the regional threshold are shaded in blue. Gradations of orange and blue shading further illustrate the variation in minority population shares across the region. Maps 2 to 5 illustrate the population distributions of the region s various minority groups. Census blocks with a minority group population share equal to or greater than 10 percent of total population are shaded in orange. Map 6 illustrates the distribution of the region s low-income population, and identifies poverty impacted geographic areas and communities within the central Puget Sound. Census tracts with poverty rates equal to or higher than the regional threshold 10.1 percent of persons below the federal poverty level - are shaded in red, whereas census tracts with poverty rates lower than the regional threshold are shaded in green. Gradations of red and green shading further illustrate the variation in concentration of poverty across the region. January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

10 Map 6 includes a pattern overlay that shows the level of quality of the poverty data being mapped. The poverty data, as with all ACS data, represents an estimate of the characteristic of the population obtained from a statistical sample of the population and, being a sample, includes a range of uncertainty represented by the margin of error. Absolute measure of an estimate s precision, like margins of error derived from the standard error of the estimate, are very difficult to map, especially the type of thematic map used in this document. A more effective way to show the relative reliability, and thus usability of an estimate is by using a relative measure of precision, in this case the ratio of its standard error to the estimate; the lower the ratio, the more useful the estimate. Observations Minority populations (Map 1) can be seen to be concentrated in the more urban areas of the region, particularly along the Interstate 5 and Interstate 405 corridors and in the Kent Valley, with an especially strong presence in central, south, and west Seattle and in central and south Tacoma. Each minority group is seen to have a uniquely different residential pattern of settlement across the region. The Black/African American population, constituting 5.3 percent of the region s total population, has a strong presence in central and south Seattle and in central and south Tacoma. The American Indian/Alaskan Native population, while constituting less than 1 percent of the region s total population, can be identified on and near the various tribal lands in the central Puget Sound. The Asian/Pacific Islander population, the region s largest minority group at 12.8 percent of total population, is widely dispersed throughout the central Puget Sound, with a much greater presence in east and south King County and in southwest Snohomish County than other minority groups. Asian/Pacific Islanders have an especially strong presence in south, and southwest Seattle. The Hispanic/Latino population, which comprises 9.5 percent of the region s total population, is relatively evenly dispersed throughout the region s urban core, with a stronger presence in south Everett, south King County, and Tacoma. Concentrations of poverty can be seen throughout the region s urban core, particularly along the Interstate 5 corridor and in central and south Seattle and the University District, south King County, Bremerton, and central and south Tacoma. January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

11 Table 1. Population by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: 2014 Central Puget Sound Total Population 1 White Black or African American Race (all categories) Ethnicity Race and Ethnicity American Indian and Alaska Native Asian/ Pacific Islander Other race or two or more races Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1 Total minority (non- White including White/Hispanic Estimate Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate Estimate MoE 3,925,661 2,833,012 12, ,264 7,146 35,935 3, ,780 6, ,670 15, ,623 1,318,068 1,706 King County 2,079,967 1,408,023 8, ,664 4,691 15,319 2, ,978 4, ,983 11, , ,394 1,344 Kitsap County 254, ,830 1,853 5,786 1,280 3,209 1,024 14,873 1,427 21,485 2,876 18,338 56, Pierce County 831, ,607 4,477 55,712 3,706 9,735 1,617 60,328 3,103 87,546 6,946 84, , Snohomish County 759, ,552 4,649 20,102 2,028 7,672 1,640 77,601 2,871 56,656 6,010 73, , Central Puget Sound 3,925, % 0.3% 5.3% 0.2% 0.9% 0.1% 12.8% 0.2% 8.8% 0.4% 9.5% 33.6% 0.0% King County 2,079, % 0.4% 6.0% 0.2% 0.7% 0.1% 16.9% 0.2% 8.7% 0.5% 9.4% 37.7% 0.1% Kitsap County 254, % 0.7% 2.3% 0.5% 1.3% 0.4% 5.9% 0.6% 8.5% 1.1% 7.2% 22.3% 0.1% Pierce County 831, % 0.5% 6.7% 0.4% 1.2% 0.2% 7.3% 0.4% 10.5% 0.8% 10.2% 31.7% 0.1% Snohomish County 759, % 0.6% 2.6% 0.3% 1.0% 0.2% 10.2% 0.4% 7.5% 0.8% 9.7% 28.1% 0.1% Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates 1 The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

12 Table 2. Poverty Statistics: 2014 Income Population for whom poverty status is determined Below 100% of poverty level Below 150% of poverty level Below 200% of poverty level Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Central Puget Sound 3,861,406 4, ,539 17, ,854 17, ,881 16,758 King County 2,050,232 2, ,043 14, ,511 11, ,796 12,630 Kitsap County 247,146 1,627 27,187 4,378 17,216 3,533 17,844 3,178 Pierce County 814,263 2, ,224 9,508 63,290 7,203 69,232 8,159 Snohomish County 749,765 2,168 73,085 8,374 41,837 6,924 56,009 7,450 Central Puget Sound 100% % 0.5% 6.7% 0.4% 7.1% 0.4% King County 100% % 0.7% 6.7% 0.6% 6.3% 0.6% Kitsap County 100% % 1.8% 7.0% 1.4% 7.2% 1.3% Pierce County 100% % 1.2% 7.8% 0.9% 8.5% 1.0% Snohomish County 100% - 9.7% 1.1% 5.6% 0.9% 7.5% 1.0% Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C17002 January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

13 Table 3. Poverty Statistics by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin: Central Puget Sound King County Kitsap County Pierce County Snohomish County Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Population for whom poverty status is determined 3,745,558 2,391 1,979,786 1, ,969 1, ,608 1, , All persons 11.6% 0.2% 11.8% 0.3% 10.9% 0.8% 12.6% 0.4% 10.3% 0.5% White 9.5% 0.2% 8.9% 0.3% 9.8% 0.8% 10.9% 0.5% 9.3% 0.5% Poverty Rate Race of householder (selected categories) Ethnicity of householder Black or African American 24.9% 1.6% 29.2% 2.0% 21.2% 5.6% 17.8% 2.5% 17.9% 4.1% American Indian/Alaska Native 22.8% 2.2% 26.1% 3.3% 20.4% 7.4% 23.2% 5.5% 17.2% 3.8% Asian 11.9% 0.7% 12.4% 0.8% 7.8% 3.0% 13.0% 1.9% 9.2% 1.4% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 18.6% 2.6% 22.3% 4.6% 12.4% 6.5% 15.8% 4.1% 14.6% 9.2% Some other race 27.9% 2.1% 28.0% 2.9% 20.0% 14.3% 29.3% 5.6% 27.5% 7.0% Two or more races 16.1% 0.8% 15.7% 1.2% 19.4% 3.5% 16.4% 1.6% 15.6% 2.3% White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 8.5% 0.2% 7.7% 0.2% 9.7% 0.8% 9.9% 0.5% 8.4% 0.4% Hispanic or Latino 23.5% 0.9% 24.3% 1.4% 16.4% 5.2% 24.5% 2.1% 21.9% 3.2% Total minority (non-white including White/Hisp) 18.1% 0.8% 18.9% 1.0% 15.4% 4.8% 18.7% 1.7% 15.6% 2.1% Source: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, table B17001A-B17001I January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

14 Table 4. Median Household Income by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin of Householder: 2014 Seattle-Tacoma- Bellevue WA Metro Area * King County Kitsap County Pierce County Snohomish County Median household income in past 12 months Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE All Households $71, $75,834 1,400 $61,794 2,426 $60,496 1,535 $71,984 1,780 Race of householder (selected categories Ethnicity of householder White $74,116 1,192 $80,804 1,313 $63,402 2,960 $63,065 2,404 $72,276 2,153 Black or African American $43,894 4,157 $38,838 4,327 $46,152 25,896 $49,618 3,581 $55,601 17,413 American Indian and Alaska Native $41,313 5,435 $28,550 10,006 $43,409 37,419 $51,127 7,996 $50,238 23,161 Asian $77,727 4,303 $83,412 5,813 $65,663 15,437 $52,019 8,166 $78,573 5,285 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander $66,463 14,799 $61,326 20,759 $49,646 40,351 $81,466 8,836 $37,194 11,883 Some other race $45,754 5,557 $43,833 4,836 $56,303 12,680 $42,456 9,028 $61,097 18,520 Two or more races $65,024 5,243 $66,423 6,263 $43,643 11,711 $56,171 5,221 $80,297 10,116 White alone, not Hispanic or Latino $75,581 1,060 $82,286 1,671 $63,449 3,558 $63,991 2,700 $73,597 2,326 Hispanic or Latino $51,905 2,646 $51,314 4,108 $56,546 6,217 $47,213 7,153 $54,824 7,394 Median HH income in past 12 months as % of all HHs median income All Households 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - 100% - Race of householder (selected categories Ethnicity of householder White 104.0% % % % % 1.7 Black or African American 61.6% % % % % 24.1 American Indian and Alaska Native 58.0% % % % % 32.1 Asian 109.1% % % % % 6.8 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 93.3% % % % % 16.5 Some other race 64.2% % % % % 25.6 Two or more races 91.2% % % % % 13.8 White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 106.0% % % % % 2.0 Hispanic or Latino 72.8% % % % % 10.1 Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table B19013 * Include King, Pierce and Snohomish counties but not Kitsap County January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

15 Table 5. Poverty Rate for the Population Age 65 and Over: 2014 Age 65 and over Total Population Population age 65 and over For whom poverty status is determined * Income in past 12 months below poverty level Poverty rate Estimate MoE Pct MoE Estimate MoE Pct MoE Central Puget Sound 3,925, ,034 1, % 0.0% 36,269 1, % 0.3% King County 2,079, ,514 6, % 0.3% 21, % 0.3% Kitsap County 254,183 29,358 2, % 0.8% 2, % 0.9% Pierce County 831, ,692 3, % 0.4% 6, % 0.4% Snohomish County 759,583 80,613 3, % 0.5% 5, % 0.6% Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table B19013 * 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C17001 January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

16 Table 6. Poverty Rate for Persons with a Disability: 2014 With a disability (or disabilities) Total Civilian noninstitutionalized population Persons with a disability Population for whom poverty status is determined Total with a disability Income in 2010 below poverty level Poverty rate in 2014 Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Estimate MoE Pct MoE Central Puget Sound 3,865,702 3, ,091 9, ,658 9,579 90,192 5, % 1.1% King County 2,066,014 1, ,822 6, ,316 6,358 45,074 3, % 1.7% Kitsap County 240,544 2,042 38,006 2,881 37,971 2,962 8,027 1, % 4.0% Pierce County 809,287 2, ,961 4, ,273 4,666 21,161 2, % 2.2% Snohomish County 749,857 1,664 84,302 4,192 84,098 4,340 15,930 2, % 2.5% Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, tables B18101, B18130 January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

17 Table 7. Households with No Vehicle: 2014 Central Puget Sound King County Kitsap County Pierce County Snohomish County Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Total Households 1,501,508 6, ,188 4,837 95,249 2, ,388 3, ,683 2,450 Households with no vehicles 123,596 4,990 85,735 4,284 6,225 1,105 17,774 2,114 13,862 1,717 Percent with no vehicles 8.2% 0.3% 10.4% 0.5% 6.5% 1.1% 5.9% 0.7% 5.0% 0.6% Minority Householder (incl. White Hispanic) * 45,205 4,677 34,446 3,893 1, ,954 1,728 3,326 1,195 Percent of Minority Households 11.3% 1.2% 13.8% 1.5% 8.6% 5.4% 7.9% 2.3% 5.8% 2.1% With no vehicle available Type of Household Income in past 12 months below poverty level* 42,563 4,455 30,060 4,022 1, ,340 1,648 4,185 1,355 Percent of Households below poverty level 27.5% 2.5% 35.1% 4.1% 19.4% 8.7% 18.0% 4.3% 17.5% 5.4% Householder age 65 and over 38,939 3,909 25,016 2,564 2,664 1,064 5,841 1,479 5,418 1,153 Percent of Households with 65+ Householder 13.2% 1.3% 16.4% 1.6% 10.7% 4.2% 9.1% 2.3% 10.1% 2.1% One or more persons with a disablity* 82,300 5,954 56,006 5,095 4,747 1,317 12,988 2,283 8,559 1,708 Percent of Households with persons of disability 19.1% 1.3% 22.2% 1.9% 19.4% 5.1% 15.5% 2.6% 12.2% 2.3% Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table B25045 * 2014 ACS Public Use Microdata Samples January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

18 Table 8. Persons with Limited English Proficiency: 2014 Total population age 5 and over Persons with limited English proficiency Limited English proficiency Language spoken at home other than or in addition to English Spanish Other Indo- European languages Asian and Pacific Island languages Other languages Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Central Puget Sound 3,679,343 1, ,781 15,595 90,547 8,423 55,992 7, ,040 9,241 23,202 4,927 King County 1,951,660 * 198,195 12,220 51,456 5,864 36,215 6,079 91,526 7,555 18,998 4,573 Kitsap County 240,348 1,412 5,265 1,685 1,646 1, ,740 1, Pierce County 774,639 * 46,369 6,506 19,063 4,675 7,450 3,053 19,043 3, Snohomish County 712, ,952 6,825 18,382 4,657 11,660 3,540 24,731 3,264 3,179 1,305 Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C16004 * The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not applicable January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

19 Table 9. Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English, Persons Age 5 Years and Over: 2014 Speaks English Less than "Very Well" Total, All Languages Spanish or Spanish Creole Chinese Vietnamese Tagalog Korean Other Languages Speak English less than "very well" Speak English "very well" * Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE REGION 90,395 2,755 37,173 1,479 30,231 1,523 15,754 1,152 23,451 1, ,939 3, ,943 5,307 3,260,767 8,832 % of total population 2.5% 0.1% 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 3.1% 0.1% 8.6% 0.1% 91.4% 0.2% King County 53,440 1,986 31,450 1,409 20,232 1,528 9, ,024 1,201 76,153 2, ,536 4,376 1,682,806 7,200 % of total population 2.8% 0.1% 1.7% 0.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.6% 0.1% 4.0% 0.2% 10.7% 0.2% 89.3% 0.4% Kitsap County 2, , , , ,718 1,265 % of total population 0.9% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 0.1% 2.6% 0.3% 97.4% 0.4% Pierce County 16,761 1,375 1, , , , ,660 1,189 43,585 2, ,666 3,204 % of total population 2.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.8% 0.1% 1.8% 0.2% 5.8% 0.3% 94.2% 0.4% Snohomish County 17,998 1,334 4, , , , ,545 1,407 55,594 2, ,577 3,850 % of total population 2.6% 0.2% 0.6% 0.1% 0.8% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.9% 0.1% 2.7% 0.2% 8.1% 0.3% 91.9% 0.5% Source: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, table B16001 * "Speak English 'very well'" Includes "Speak only English" January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

20 Table 10. Common Languages Other Than English Spoken in the Central Puget Sound: 2014 Rank Central Puget Sound Region Est MoE 1 Spanish 209,206 7,207 2 Other Asian/Pacific Island 86,572 7,114 3 Other Indo-European 73,233 7,706 4 Chinese 66,957 5,725 5 Slavic languages 52,997 6,314 6 Vietnamese 51,764 6,504 7 Other languages 47,568 5,334 8 Tagalog 46,862 4,982 9 Korean 44,954 6, German 22,938 2, French 14,868 2,628 Rank King County Kitsap County Pierce County Snohomish County Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE 1 Spanish 119,846 5,387 Spanish 5,977 1,555 Spanish 40,766 3,823 Spanish 42,617 3,185 2 Chinese 57,782 5,020 Tagalog 4,865 1,434 Other Asian/Pacific Island 14,439 2,889 Other Indo-European 13,833 3,016 3 Other Asian/Pacific Island 55,339 5,725 Other Asian/Pacific Island 3,308 1,251 Korean 11,654 2,544 Other Asian/Pacific Island 13,486 3,499 4 Other Indo-European 53,208 6,928 Korean 1, Slavic languages 9,766 3,102 Other languages 9,876 2,865 5 Vietnamese 37,164 6,168 Slavic languages 1,286 1,177 Tagalog 6,930 2,185 Slavic languages 9,656 2,643 6 Other languages 33,270 4,928 Other Indo-European 1, German 6,034 1,571 Vietnamese 8,926 2,739 7 Slavic languages 32,289 4,866 French Other Indo-European 5,153 2,027 Korean 7,200 1,994 8 Tagalog 28,330 4,201 German Vietnamese 5,136 2,065 Chinese 6,908 2,189 9 Korean 24,793 4,760 Vietnamese Other languages 4,024 1,607 Tagalog 6,737 1, German 11,853 1,788 Other languages Chinese 1, German 4,227 1, French 10,306 2,175 Chinese French 1, French 2,235 1,028 Source: 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C16001 January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

21 Table 10. Common Languages Other Than English Spoken in the Central Puget Sound: 2014 Rank Central Puget Sound Region Est MoE 1 Spanish 219,345 3,351 2 Chinese 73,279 2,412 3 Vietnamese 49,942 2,517 4 Tagalog 47,102 2,370 5 Korean 42,510 2,340 6 African languages 39,727 2,614 7 Russian 31,962 2,194 8 Other Pacific Island 23,897 1,445 9 Other Asian languages 22,916 1, Other Slavic languages 20,378 2,071 Rank King County Kitsap County Pierce County Snohomish County Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE Est MoE 1 Spanish 126,437 2,123 Spanish 6, Spanish 44,273 1,557 Spanish 41,983 1,730 2 Chinese 62,141 2,255 Tagalog 4, Korean 10,137 1,031 Korean 9,774 1,234 3 Vietnamese 34,056 2,354 Other Pacific Island 1, Tagalog 6, Vietnamese 8, African languages 32,278 2,435 French Vietnamese 6, Chinese 8, Tagalog 27,418 1,804 Japanese German 6, Tagalog 7,949 1,154 6 Korean 22,062 1,851 German Other Pacific Island 6, Russian 6, Other Asian languages 19,777 1,509 Vietnamese Russian 5, African languages 5, Russian 19,568 1,700 Chinese Mon-Khmer, Cambodian 5, Other Slavic languages 5,406 1,063 9 Other Indic languages 16,164 1,843 Korean Other Slavic languages 2, Arabic 2, Hindi 14,159 1,254 Russian Japanese 2, Other Indic languages 2, Source: 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, table C16001 January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

22 Map 1. Minority Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

23 Map 2. Black/African American Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

24 Map 3. American Indian/Alaskan Native Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

25 Map 4. Asian/Pacific Islander Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

26 Map 5. Hispanic/Latino Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

27 Map 6. Low-Income Population, Central Puget Sound: January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

28 Appendix A. DATA SOURCES 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year File Smallest geographic unit: areas 65,000 population and over Table B Sex by Age Table B Race Table B Hispanic or Latino by Race Table C Language Spoken at Home for the Population 5 Years and Over Table C Age by Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over Table C Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age Table C Ratio of Income to Poverty Level in the Past 12 Months Table B Sex by Age by Disability Status Table B Sex by Age by Disability Status by Employment Status for the Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population 5 Years and Over Table B Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) Table B Tenure by Vehicles Available by Age of Householder Table B19013A. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (White Alone Householder) Table B19013B. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Black or African American Alone Householder) Table B19013C. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (American Indian and Alaskan Native Alone Householder) Table B19013D. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Asian Alone Householder) Table B19013E. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone Householder) Table B19013F. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Some Other Race Householder) Table B19013G. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Two or More Races Householder) Table B19013H. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (Hispanic or Latino Householder) Table B19013I. Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2014 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) (White Alone, Not Hispanic or Latino Householder) American Community Survey 5-Year File Smallest geographic unit: census tract Table B Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

29 American Community Survey 5-Year File Smallest geographic unit: census block group Table B Race Table B Hispanic or Latino by Race Table B Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age Table B17001A. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (White Alone) Table B17001B. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Black or African American Alone) Table B17001C. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (American Indian and Alaskan Native Alone) Table B17001D. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Asian Alone) Table B17001E. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone) Table B17001F. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Some Other Race Alone) Table B17001G. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Two or More Races Alone) Table B17001H. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (Hispanic or Latino) Table B17001I. Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Sex by Age (White Alone, Not Hispanic or Latino) 2010 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Samples Data derived from PUMS year data set: Vehicles available (zero, 1 or more) by poverty status (universe: occupied housing units) Vehicles available (zero, 1 or more) by presence of one or more household members with a disability (universe: occupied housing units) January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

30 Appendix B. POVERTY THRESHOLDS IN 1982 By Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years Old (Dollars) Size of family unit Related children under 18 years None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight or more One person (unrelated individual): Under 65 years 5, years and over 4,626 Two persons: Householder under 65 years 6,459 6,649 Householder 65 years and over 5,831 6,624 Three persons 7,546 7,765 7,772 Four persons 9,950 10,112 9,783 9,817 Five persons 11,999 12,173 11,801 11,512 11,336 Six persons 13,801 13,855 13,570 13,296 12,890 12,649 Seven persons 15,879 15,979 15,637 15,399 14,955 14,437 13,869 Eight persons or more 17,760 17,917 17,594 17,312 16,911 16,403 15,872 15,738 Nine persons or more 21,364 21,468 21,183 20,943 20,549 20,008 19,517 19,397 18,649 Source: U.S. Census Bureau January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

31 Appendix C POVERTY FACTORS Poverty Interview Month Factors January February March April May June July August September October November December Source: U.S. Census Bureau January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

32 Appendix D. ALTERNATIVE DATA SOURCES The PSRC researched and documented the following alternative data sources to the Census Bureau s decennial census and American Community Survey (ACS). It was determined that these alternatives can help to verify key race/ethnic and income trends as estimated by the decennial census and ACS, but provide limited additional information of value beyond what is available from the Census Bureau datasets for conducting environmental justice analyses at either a metropolitan or sub-county scale. Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) OFM data products: Population of Cities, Towns, and Counties Annual April 1 population estimates for municipalities and counties in Washington state. Population Estimates by County by Age, Gender, Race, and Hispanic Origin Periodic population estimates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic/Latino origin for counties in Washington state. The most recent estimates available are for Median Household Income Estimates by County Annual median household income estimates, as well as a current year projection, for counties in Washington state. Applications: These data sets can be used to verify key demographic trends at the county level as estimated by the American Community Survey. Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) OSPI data products: School Enrollment Summary - Annual October school district enrollments with minority detail by county, school district, and building for Washington state. Public School Districts Free- and Reduced-Price Meal Eligibility Status by District - Annual October free- and reduced-price meal applications relative to total enrollment by county and school district for Washington state. Applications: These data sets may be used as proxies for sub-county minority and low-income populations and to track annual changes in these populations at the school district geography. They can also be used to verify key demographic trends as estimated by the American Community Survey. Advantages: OSPI s School Enrollment Summary is the only source of data that allows for tracking change in minority populations at a sub-county geography. Both minority and low-income populations can be tracked consistently at the school district geography. January 2016 Environmental Justice Demographic Profile