CED: An Overview of the Law
|
|
- Cory Randall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Administrative Law Notes for IV.1-11: Standards of Review IV.1: General Principles FN1. C.U.P.E., Local 963 v. New Brunswick Liquor Corp. (1979), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 227 (S.C.C.); Syndicat national des employés de la commission scolaire régionale de l'outaouais v. U.E.S., local 298 (1988), [1988] 2 S.C.R (S.C.C.); Pezim v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers) (1994), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 557 (S.C.C.); Canada (Director of Investigation & Research) v. Southam Inc. (1997), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 748 (S.C.C.); Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Q. v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (British Columbia) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226 (S.C.C.); Ryan v. Law Society (New Brunswick) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247 (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Jones & de Villars, Principles of Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 2009), chap. 12 (historical development of the principles governing standards of review). FN2. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); Q. v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (British Columbia) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226 (S.C.C.); Ryan v. Law Society (New Brunswick) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247 (S.C.C.); Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.). FN3. Voice Construction Ltd. v. Construction & General Workers' Union, Local 92 (2004), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 609 (S.C.C.). FN4. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.). IV.2: Two Standards of Review: Reasonableness and Correctness FN1. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); see also Jones & de Villars, Principles of Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 2009),
2 chap. 12 (historical development of the principles governing standards of review); see also 404 (statutorily defined standards of review which may include a third standard of patent unreasonableness). FN2. Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Mills v. Ontario (Workplace Safety & Insurance Appeals Tribunal) (2008), 2008 ONCA 436 (Ont. C.A.); I.A.M. & A.W., Local 99 v. Finning International Inc. (2008), 2008 ABCA 400 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2009), 2009 CarswellAlta 563 (S.C.C.); Jones & de Villars, Principles of Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 2009), chap. 12 (historical development of the principles governing standards of review and the meaning of reasonableness). FN3. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Petro-Canada v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) (2009), 2009 BCCA 396 (B.C. C.A.) (court reviewing on reasonableness standard should focus on result, not reasons for result); Burke v. N.A.P.E. (2010), 2010 NLCA 12 (N.L. C.A.) (for decision to be reasonable, delegate must respond to essential arguments); Leon's Furniture Ltd. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 22 Admin. L.R. (5th) 11 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 1938 (S.C.C.) (court distinguishing between objective standard of reasonableness set out in statute and Dunsmuir standard); Catalyst Paper Corp. v. North Cowichan (District) (2012), 2012 CarswellBC 17 (S.C.C.); Doré c. Québec (Tribunal des professions) (2012), 2012 CarswellQue 2048 (S.C.C.) (court addressing how to reconcile concept of reasonableness with the concept of "reasonable limits" under s. 1 of Charter); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Canada (Public Works & Government Services) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 1826 (S.C.C.); Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. CEP, Local 30 (2013), 2013 CarswellNB 275 (S.C.C.) (illustrating what is reasonable to one judge may not be reasonable to another). FN4. Németh c. Canada (Ministre de la Justice) (2010), [2010] 3 S.C.R. 281 (S.C.C.). FN5. See, for example, Administrative Tribunals Act, S.B.C. 2004, c. 45, ss. 58, 59; Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, s [en. 2006, c. 30, s. 5; am. 2009, c. 33, Sched. 2, s. 35(3)]; Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.) (discussing s Federal Courts Act); Manz v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2009), 82 Admin. L.R. (4th) 185 (B.C. C.A.); Victoria Times Colonist Group Inc. v. C.E.P., Local 25-G (2009), 2009 BCCA 229 (B.C. C.A.); Asquini v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2009), 82 Admin. L.R. (4th) 127 (B.C. S.C. [In Chambers]); Tallarico v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2009), 82 Admin. L.R.
3 (4th) 161 (B.C. S.C.); Buttar v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2009), 2009 BCSC 1228 (B.C. S.C.); Doughty v. Whitworth Holdings Ltd. (2008), 2008 BCSC 801 (B.C. S.C.); McGrath v. British Columbia (Ministry of Children & Family Development) (2009), 2009 BCSC 180 (B.C. S.C.); Jensen v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2010), 16 Admin. L.R. (5th) 76 (B.C. S.C.); affirmed (2011), 23 Admin. L.R. (5th) 200 (B.C. C.A.); Djakovic v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2010), 12 Admin. L.R. (5th) 280 (B.C. S.C.); British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 2702 (S.C.C.); U.S.W. v. Auyeung (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 3531 (B.C. C.A.) (court discussing effect that Dunsmuir has on standard of patently unreasonableness); Downs Construction Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 2165 (B.C. S.C. [In Chambers]); reversed on other grounds (2012), 2012 CarswellBC 3044 (B.C. C.A.); Franzke v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal) (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 2191 (B.C. S.C.); Jones & de Villars, Principles of Administrative Law, 5th ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 2009), chap. 12 (concept of patent unreasonableness). FN6. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Nabors Canada LP v. Alberta (Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission) (2006), 50 Admin. L.R. (4th) 290 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2007), 2007 CarswellAlta 834 (S.C.C.); Foster v. Alberta (Transportation & Safety Board) (2006), 53 Admin. L.R. (4th) 137 (Alta. C.A.); Chauvet v. Alberta (Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission) (2007), 55 Admin. L.R. (4th) 117 (Alta. C.A.); White v. Alberta (Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission) (2006), 41 Admin. L.R. (4th) 141 (Alta. Q.B.); Pincher Creek (Town) v. Alberta (Municipal Government Board) (2006), 2006 CarswellAlta 2092 (Alta. Q.B.); affirmed (2007), 2007 ABCA 360 (Alta. C.A.); Sparks v. British Columbia (Ministry of Public Safety & Solicitor General) (2009), 2009 BCCA 374 (B.C. C.A.). FN7. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Kerry (Canada) Inc. v. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services) (2009), [2009] 2 S.C.R. 678 (S.C.C.); Coffey v. College of Licensed Practical Nurses (Manitoba) (2008), 2008 MBCA 33 (Man. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2008), 2008 CarswellMan 488 (S.C.C.); Flora v. Ontario Health Insurance Plan (2008), 76 Admin. L.R. (4th) 132 (Ont. C.A.); Igbinosun v. Law Society of Upper Canada (2008), 83 Admin. L.R. (4th) 106 (Ont. Div. Ct.); affirmed (2009), 93 Admin. L.R. (4th) 249 (Ont. C.A.); Law Society of Upper Canada v. Evans (2008), 83 Admin. L.R. (4th) 86 (Ont. Div. Ct.).
4 FN8. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); see also FN9. C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.). FN10. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); Paul v. British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission) (2003), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 585 (S.C.C.); Martin v. Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) (2003), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 504 (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Proprio Direct inc. c. Pigeon (2008), [2008] 2 S.C.R. 195 (S.C.C.); United States v. Lake (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761 (S.C.C.); Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony v. Alberta (2009), [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567 (S.C.C.); R. v. Conway (2010), [2010] 1 S.C.R. 765 (S.C.C.) (correctness presumably applying where Charter issue raised, although court not discussing standard of review); Northrop Grumman Overseas Services Corp. v. Canada (Department of Public Works & Government Services) (2009), [2009] 3 S.C.R. 309 (S.C.C.); Plourde c. Québec (Commission des relations du travail) (2009), [2009] 3 S.C.R. 465 (S.C.C.); MiningWatch Canada v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries & Oceans) (2010), [2010] 1 S.C.R. 6 (S.C.C.); United Taxi Drivers' Fellowship of Southern Alberta v. Calgary (City) (2004), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485 (S.C.C.); M.A.H.C.P. v. Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 606 (S.C.C.); reversing (2010), 2010 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.) (requirements for estoppel in labour relations matter not fitting into the category of question of "general law" that is of central importance to legal system and outside the adjudicator's specialized area of expertise); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (2012), 2012 CarswellNS 124 (S.C.C.) (court narrowing concept of "preliminary or collateral" questions of law which engage the correctness standard); Calgary Fire Fighters Assns. v. Calgary (City) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 590 (Alta. C.A.); A.T.A. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2068 (S.C.C.); but see Investment Dealers Assn. of Canada v. Taub (2009), 2009 ONCA 628 (Ont. C.A.); Hibernia Management & Development Co. v. Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board (2008), 84 Admin. L.R. (4th) 241 (N.L. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2009), 2009 CarswellNfld 45 (S.C.C.) (reasonableness may be proper standard on questions of law); Amherst (Town) v. Nova Scotia (Superintendent of Pensions) (2008), 91 Admin. L.R. (4th) 256 (N.S. C.A.). FN11. Lévis (Ville) c. Côté (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 591 (S.C.C.); VIA Rail Canada Inc. v. Canadian Transportation Agency (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650 (S.C.C.); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v.
5 Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (2012), 2012 CarswellNS 124 (S.C.C.) (court narrowing concept of "preliminary or collateral" questions of law which engage the correctness standard); M.A.H.C.P. v. Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 606 (S.C.C.); reversing (2010), 2010 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.) (requirements for estoppel in labour relations matter not fitting into the category of question of "general law" that is of central importance to legal system and outside adjudicator's specialized area of expertise); Canada (Attorney General) v. Mowat (2011), 2011 CarswellNat 4190 (S.C.C.) (question being one of true jurisdiction if it requires tribunal to explicitly determine whether its statutory grant of power gives it authority to decide matter). FN12. Cuddy Chicks Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board) (1991), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 5 (S.C.C.); Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); Paul v. British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission) (2003), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 585 (S.C.C.); Martin v. Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) (2003), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 504 (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); Alliance Pipeline Ltd. v. Smith (2011), [2011] 1 S.C.R. 160 (S.C.C.); Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony v. Alberta (2009), [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567 (S.C.C.); R. v. Conway (2010), [2010] 1 S.C.R. 765 (S.C.C.) (correctness presumably applying where Charter issue raised, although court not discussing standard of review); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (2012), 2012 CarswellNS 124 (S.C.C.) (court narrowing concept of "preliminary or collateral" questions of law which engage the correctness standard); Calgary Fire Fighters Assns. v. Calgary (City) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 590 (Alta. C.A.); Nunavut v. Nunavut Employees Union (2011), 2011 CarswellNun 22 (Nun. C.J.); A.T.A. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2068 (S.C.C.); but see Consolidated Fastfrate Inc. v. Western Canada Council of Teamsters (2009), [2009] 3 S.C.R. 407 (S.C.C.) (correctness not always being proper standard in constitutional cases; not being proper where constitutional analysis capable of being separated from factual findings); United States v. Lake (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761 (S.C.C.) (reasonableness being proper standard even though Charter issues raised); M.A.H.C.P. v. Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 606 (S.C.C.); reversing (2010), 2010 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.) (requirements for estoppel in labour relations matter not fitting into the category of question of "general law" that is of central importance to legal system and outside the adjudicator's specialized area of expertise); Doré c. Québec (Tribunal des professions) (2012), 2012 CarswellQue 2048 (S.C.C.) (court distinguishing between cases involving issue of whether law violates Charter and cases involving issue of whether decision violates Charter); AUPE v. Alberta (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2029 (Alta. Q.B.); affirmed (2013),
6 2013 CarswellAlta 991 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2013), 2013 CarswellAlta 2291 (S.C.C.); Tursunbayev v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 1327 (F.C.) (reasonableness standard applying even though s. 7 Charter interests being implicated). FN13. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.); British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 2702 (S.C.C.); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (2012), 2012 CarswellNS 124 (S.C.C.) (Commission's decision to appoint board of inquiry being discretionary in nature); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Canada (Public Works & Government Services) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 1826 (S.C.C.); Catalyst Paper Corp. v. North Cowichan (District) (2012), 2012 CarswellBC 17 (S.C.C.); Doré c. Québec (Tribunal des professions) (2012), 2012 CarswellQue 2048 (S.C.C.); UFCW-Can, Local 401 v. Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) (2012), [2012] 6 W.W.R. 211 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal allowed (2012), 2012 CarswellAlta 1769 (S.C.C.); Alberta (Minister of Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 2419 (S.C.C.); Kane v. Canada (Deputy Head - Service Canada) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 4550 (S.C.C.); AUPE v. Alberta (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2029 (Alta. Q.B.); affirmed (2013), 2013 CarswellAlta 991 (Alta. C.A.); Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. CEP, Local 30 (2013), 2013 CarswellNB 275 (S.C.C.); but see M.A.H.C.P. v. Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 606 (S.C.C.); reversing (2010), 2010 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.) (requirements for estoppel in labour relations matter attracting reasonableness standard). FN14. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Alliance Pipeline Ltd. v. Smith (2011), [2011] 1 S.C.R. 160 (S.C.C.); Celgene Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2011), [2011] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); Proprio Direct inc. c. Pigeon (2008), [2008] 2 S.C.R. 195 (S.C.C.); Kerry (Canada) Inc. v. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services) (2009), [2009] 2 S.C.R. 678 (S.C.C.) (where question involves interpretation of enabling statute, correctness being proper standard only in exceptional circumstances); Leon's Furniture Ltd. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 22 Admin. L.R. (5th) 11 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 1938 (S.C.C.); Hopewell Development (Leduc) Inc., Re (2011), 17 Admin. L.R. (5th) 119 (Alta. C.A.); Canada (Attorney General) v. Mowat (2011), 2011 CarswellNat 4190 (S.C.C.); A.T.A. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2068 (S.C.C.); U.S.W. v. Auyeung (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 3531 (B.C. C.A.);
7 UBCJA, Local 1985 v. Saskatchewan (Labour Relations Board) (2011), 2011 CarswellSask 712 (Sask. Q.B.); additional reasons at (2013), 2013 CarswellSask 384 (Sask. Q.B.); Global Crédit & collection inc. c. Québec (Commission des relations du travail) (2011), 2011 CarswellQue (Que. C.A.); Kelly v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board) (2012), 2012 CarswellAlta 93 (Alta. C.A.); Entertainment Software Assn. v. Society of Composers, Authors & Music Publishers of Canada (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 2376 (S.C.C.); Edmonton School District No. 7 v. ATA (2013), 2013 CarswellAlta 592 (Alta. C.A.); Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. CEP, Local 30 (2013), 2013 CarswellNB 275 (S.C.C.); but see Shaw Cablesystems G.P. v. Society of Composers, Authors & Music Publishers of Canada (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 2378 (S.C.C.) (court applying correctness standard because under statutory scheme court having jurisdiction with respect to same legal issues); Georgia Strait Alliance v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries & Oceans) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 262 (F.C.A.) (court distinguishing between adjudicative statutory delegates and non-adjudicative delegates); Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) v. Dhillon (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 1904 (F.C.). FN15. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); Khosa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2009), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.) (reasonableness may be appropriate even where court reviewing question of law); Pezim v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers) (1994), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 557 (S.C.C.); Western Forest Products Inc. v. Hayes Forest Services Ltd. (2009), 92 Admin. L.R. (4th) 19 (B.C. C.A.); Investment Dealers Assn. of Canada v. Taub (2009), 2009 ONCA 628 (Ont. C.A.); Hibernia Management & Development Co. v. Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board (2008), 84 Admin. L.R. (4th) 241 (N.L. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2009), 2009 CarswellNfld 45 (S.C.C.) (reasonableness may be proper standard on questions of law); M.A.H.C.P. v. Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 606 (S.C.C.); reversing (2010), 2010 CarswellMan 217 (Man. C.A.) (requirements for estoppel in labour relations matter not fitting into the category of question of "general law" that is of central importance to legal system and outside the adjudicator's specialized area of expertise). FN16. U.N.A., Local 301 v. Capital Health Authority (University of Alberta) (2009), 94 Admin. L.R. (4th) 165 (Alta. C.A.); Guinn v. Manitoba (2009), 98 Admin. L.R. (4th) 68 (Man. C.A.); Maritime Paper Products Ltd. v. C.E.P., Local 1520 (2009), 2009 NSCA 60 (N.S. C.A.); Simard c. Québec (Juge de la Cour du Québec) (2009), 96 Admin. L.R. (4th) 96 (Que. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2009), 2009 CarswellQue 8916 (S.C.C.); Investment Dealers Assn. of Canada v. Taub (2009), 2009 ONCA 628 (Ont. C.A.); Burke v. N.A.P.E. (2010), 2010 NLCA 12 (N.L. C.A.) (for decision to be reasonable, delegate must respond to essential arguments); NAPE v. Newfoundland and
8 Labrador Health Boards Assn. (2010), 11 Admin. L.R. (5th) 142 (N.L. T.D.); reversed in part on other grounds (2012), 2012 CarswellNfld 477 (N.L. C.A.). IV.4: Distinction Between the Standard to be Applied by the Delegate at First Instance and the Standard of Review to be Applied by the Courts FN1. Q. v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (British Columbia) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226 (S.C.C.); Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); see also C. (R.) v. McDougall (2008), 2008 CarswellBC 2041 (S.C.C.) (there being only one standard of proof in civil matters: "on the balance of probabilities"). IV.5: Standard to be applied by Higher Court to Lower Court s Choice of Standard FN1. Q. v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (British Columbia) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226 (S.C.C.); Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs) v. Alberta (Municipal Government Board) (2002), 45 Admin. L.R. (3d) 1 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2003), 314 N.R. 208 (note) (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (2003), 6 Admin. L.R. (4th) 221 (Alta. C.A.); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Henthorne v. British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 3118 (B.C. C.A.); Leon's Furniture Ltd. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 453 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 1938 (S.C.C.); Pridgen v. University of Calgary (2012), 2012 CarswellAlta 797 (Alta. C.A.); Lebon v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 2416 (F.C.A.). IV.6: Different Judges May Select Different Standards or Apply Same Standard Differently FN1. Voice Construction Ltd. v. Construction & General Workers' Union, Local 92 (2004), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 609 (S.C.C.); Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services) (2004), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 152 (S.C.C.); A.U.P.E. v. Lethbridge Community College (2004), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 727 (S.C.C.); Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn. (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 476 (S.C.C.); Lévis (Ville) c. Côté (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 591 (S.C.C.); VIA Rail Canada Inc. v. Canadian Transportation Agency (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650 (S.C.C.); New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir (2008), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 (S.C.C.); Celgene Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2011), 2011 CarswellNat 34 (S.C.C.).
9 FN2. Chieu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 84 (S.C.C.); Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); MacDonell c. Québec (Commission d'accès à l'information) (2002), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 661 (S.C.C.); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn. (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 476 (S.C.C.); Starson v. Swayze (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 722 (S.C.C.); Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. CEP, Local 30 (2013), 2013 CarswellNB 275 (S.C.C.). IV.7: Different Standards of Review May Apply to Different Issues FN1. Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982 (S.C.C.); additional reasons at (1998), [1998] 1 S.C.R (S.C.C.); Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (1999), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 (S.C.C.); Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); MacDonell c. Québec (Commission d'accès à l'information) (2002), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 661 (S.C.C.); Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn. (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 476 (S.C.C.); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79 (2003), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77 (S.C.C.); Lévis (Ville) c. Côté (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 591 (S.C.C.); VIA Rail Canada Inc. v. Canadian Transportation Agency (2007), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 650 (S.C.C.); University of British Columbia v. University of British Columbia Faculty Assn. (2007), 59 Admin. L.R. (4th) 245 (B.C. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2007), 2007 CarswellBC 2577 (S.C.C.). IV.8: The Application of the Standard of Review Analysis to Discretionary Decisions FN1. Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (1999), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 (S.C.C.) (pragmatic and functional approach being required to determine standard of review for reviewing exercise of discretionary decisions); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); Centre hospitalier Mont-Sinaï c. Québec (Ministre de la Santé & des Services sociaux) (2001), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 281 (S.C.C.); Chieu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 84 (S.C.C.); Moreau-Bérubé c. Nouveau-Brunswick (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 249 (S.C.C.); British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) (2011), 2011 CarswellBC 2702 (S.C.C.); Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (2012), 2012 CarswellNS 124 (S.C.C.) (commission's decision to appoint board of inquiry being discretionary in nature); Halifax (Regional
10 Municipality) v. Canada (Public Works & Government Services) (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 1826 (S.C.C.); S.T.T.P. c. Société canadienne des postes (2012), 2012 CarswellNat 208 (F.C.). IV.9: The Standard May Change Over Time FN1. Ivanhoe inc. c. Travailleurs & travailleuses unis de l'alimentation & du commerce, section 500 (2001), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 565 (S.C.C.). IV.10: Standards of Review and Administrative Appellate Bodies FN1. Plimmer v. Calgary (City) Chief of Police (2004), 2004 ABCA 175 (Alta. C.A.); Nelson v. Assn. of Registered Nurses (Alberta) (2005), 2005 ABCA 229 (Alta. C.A.); Litchfield v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (Alberta) (2008), 2008 ABCA 164 (Alta. C.A.); Newton v. Criminal Trial Lawyers' Assn. (2010), 14 Admin. L.R. (5th) 181 (Alta. C.A.); Eltom v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2011), 2011 ABCA 260 (Alta. C.A.); Barreau (Québec) c. Québec (Tribunal des professions) (2011), 2011 QCCA 1498 (Que. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2012), 2012 CarswellQue 1921 (S.C.C.); Pelech v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2010), 13 Admin. L.R. (5th) 189 (Alta. C.A.); Simard c. Richard (2010), 14 Admin. L.R. (5th) 289 (Que. S.C.); leave to appeal refused (2010), 2010 CarswellQue (Que. C.A.); Simard c. Québec (Juge de la Cour du Québec) (2009), 2009 QCCA 1345 (Que. C.A.); Sussman v. College of Psychologists (Alberta) (2010), 16 Admin. L.R. (5th) 211 (Alta. C.A.). FN2. Newton v. Criminal Trial Lawyers' Assn. (2010), 14 Admin. L.R. (5th) 181 (Alta. C.A.); Pelech v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2010), 13 Admin. L.R. (5th) 189 (Alta. C.A.); Eltom v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2011), 2011 ABCA 260 (Alta. C.A.); Osteria de Medici Restaurant Ltd. v. Yaworski (2009), 3 Admin. L.R. (5th) 9 (Alta. Q.B.); Sussman v. College of Psychologists (Alberta) (2010), 16 Admin. L.R. (5th) 211 (Alta. C.A.). FN3. Newton v. Criminal Trial Lawyers' Assn. (2010), 14 Admin. L.R. (5th) 181 (Alta. C.A.); Pelech v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2010), 13 Admin. L.R. (5th) 189 (Alta. C.A.); Eltom v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2011), 2011 ABCA 260 (Alta. C.A.); Sussman v. College of Psychologists (Alberta) (2010), 16 Admin. L.R. (5th) 211 (Alta. C.A.). FN4. Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Anglican Diocesan Centre Corp. (2010), 7 Admin. L.R. (5th) 239 (N.S. C.A.); Creelman v. Truro (Town) (2010), 2010 NSCA 27 (N.S. C.A.); KPMG inc. c. Montréal (Ville) (2010), 2010 QCCA 68 (Que. C.A.); Brian Neil Friesen Dental Corp. v. Manitoba (Director of Companies Office) (2011), 2011 CarswellMan 50 (Man. C.A.). IV.11: The Distinction Between the Standard of Review and the Content of the Duty of Fairness
11 FN1. Moreau-Bérubé c. Nouveau-Brunswick (2002), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 249 (S.C.C.) (standard of review analysis not being required in determining whether there had been a breach of procedural fairness); C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (2003), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 (S.C.C.); Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (1999), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 (S.C.C.); British Columbia (Securities Commission) v. Pacific International Securities Inc. (2002), 2002 BCCA 421 (B.C. C.A.); Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner v. MacDonald (2009), 3 Admin. L.R. (5th) 278 (Ont. C.A.) (standard of review analysis not being required where allegation of unfair procedure); Bowater Mersey Paper Co. v. C.E.P., Local 141 (2010), 3 Admin. L.R. (5th) 261 (N.S. C.A.) (standard of review analysis not being required where allegation of unfair procedure); Homburg Canada Inc. v. Nova Scotia (Utility & Review Board) (2010), 5 Admin. L.R. (5th) 266 (N.S. C.A.) (standard of review analysis not being triggered by allegation of breach of procedural fairness); see also I.B.E.W., Local 894 v. Ellis-Don Ltd. (2001), [2001] 1 S.C.R. 221 (S.C.C.) (dissenting judgment; standard of review for issues of procedural fairness being correctness); Boardwalk Reit LLP v. Edmonton (City) (2008), 75 Admin. L.R. (4th) 19 (Alta. C.A.); reconsideration refused (2008), 2008 CarswellAlta 1084 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2008), 2008 CarswellAlta 2026 (S.C.C.); Western Forest Products Inc. v. Hayes Forest Services Ltd. (2009), 92 Admin. L.R. (4th) 19 (B.C. C.A.); but see Sketchley v. Canada (Attorney General) (2005), 44 Admin. L.R. (4th) 4 (F.C.A.). FN2. R. v. M. (R.E.) (2008), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3 (S.C.C.); Burke v. N.A.P.E. (2010), 2010 NLCA 12 (N.L. C.A.); Leon's Furniture Ltd. v. Alberta (Information & Privacy Commissioner) (2011), 22 Admin. L.R. (5th) 11 (Alta. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 1938 (S.C.C.); BTC Properties II Ltd. v. Calgary (City) (2010), 19 Admin. L.R. (5th) 283 (Alta. Q.B.); affirmed (2012), 2012 CarswellAlta 16 (Alta. C.A.); Spinks v. Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board) (2011), 23 Admin. L.R. (5th) 1 (Alta. C.A.) (court rejecting deferential approach to assessing adequacy of reasons); Sussman v. College of Psychologists (Alberta) (2010), 16 Admin. L.R. (5th) 211 (Alta. C.A.); Clifford v. Ontario (Attorney General) (2009), 93 Admin. L.R. (4th) 131 (Ont. C.A.); leave to appeal refused (2010), 2010 CarswellOnt 439 (S.C.C.); N.L.N.U. v. Newfoundland & Labrador (Treasury Board) (2010), 2010 NLCA 13 (N.L. C.A.); affirmed (2011), 2011 CarswellNfld 414 (S.C.C.); Petro-Canada v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) (2009), 2009 BCCA 396 (B.C. C.A.); but see N.L.N.U. v. Newfoundland & Labrador (Treasury Board) (2011), 2011 CarswellNfld 414 (S.C.C.) (inadequacy of delegate's reasons not being stand-alone ground for judicial review); BTC Properties II Ltd. v. Calgary (City) (2012), 2012 CarswellAlta 16 (Alta. C.A.); Cameron Corp. v. Edmonton (Subdivision & Development Appeal Board) (2011), 2011 CarswellAlta 2162 (Alta. C.A.); affirmed (2012), 2012 ABCA 254 (Alta. C.A.).
November 26 and 27, 2010 Ottawa, Ontario RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
The Canadian Bar Association National Administrative Law and Labour & Employment Law and Privacy & Access Law Conference: Behind the Eight Ball or Ahead of the Curve November 26 and 27, 2010 Ottawa, Ontario
More informationCanadian Bar Association National Administrative Law, Labour and Employment Conference: Behind Closed Doors
Canadian Bar Association 2011 National Administrative Law, Labour and Employment Conference: Behind Closed Doors November 25-26, 2011 Ottawa, Ontario RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DAVID PHILLIP
More informationIndexed As: Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Human Rights Commission (N.S.) et al.
Halifax Regional Municipality, a body corporate duly incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nova Scotia (appellant) v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Lucien Comeau, Lynn Connors and Her Majesty the
More informationConstitutional Practice and Procedure in Administrative Tribunals: An Emerging Issue
Constitutional Practice and Procedure in Administrative Tribunals: An Emerging Issue David Stratas Introduction After much controversy, 1 the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that tribunals that have
More informationNovember 20 and 21, 2009 Ottawa, Ontario RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
The Canadian Bar Association National Administrative Law and Conference: Access and Independence: Restoring the Balance in Administrative Tribunals and Labour Boards November 20 and 21, 2009 Ottawa, Ontario
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
The Canadian Bar Association National Administrative Law and Conference: Beyond the Horizon: The Expanding and Overlapping Jurisdiction of Arbitrators & Tribunals November 21 and 22, 2008 Ottawa, Ontario
More informationNoteworthy administrative law judgments of Ontario and Atlantic Canada 1
Noteworthy administrative law judgments of 2010 Ontario and Atlantic Canada 1 Brian K. Awad 2 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the 2010 edition of an annual coastto-cast review
More informationAdministrative Law Update A West Coast Perspective
Administrative Law Update A West Coast Perspective These materials were prepared by Thora Sigurdson of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver, BC, for the 2010 National Administrative Law, Labour & Employment
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10 DATE: 20120316 DOCKET: 33651 BETWEEN: Halifax Regional Municipality, a body corporate
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153 Date: 2016-06-16 Docket: Hfx No. 447446 Registry: Halifax Between: Annette Louise Hyson Applicant v. Nova
More informationTIPS ON AVOIDING SUCCESSFUL JUDICIAL REVIEW I
Energy Regulatory Forum May 19,2010 McDougall Centre (Pekisko Room) - 2: 15 to 3:15 Calgary TIPS ON AVOIDING SUCCESSFUL JUDICIAL REVIEW I The Honourable Neil C. Wittmann Chief Justice, Court of Queen's
More informationIndexed As: Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. Federal Court Mactavish, J. April 18, 2012.
Canadian Human Rights Commission (applicant) v. Attorney General of Canada, First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, Assembly of First Nations, Chiefs of Ontario, Amnesty International (respondents)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
2011 BCSC 112 British Columbia (Attorney General) v. British Columbia (Information a... Page 1 of 24 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And British Columbia (Attorney General)
More informationADMINISTRATIVE LAW LAW COURSE SYLLABUS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LAW 372-003 COURSE SYLLABUS Instructor: David E. Gruber, F.C.I.Arb., B.Sc.Arch. (McGill), J.D. (U. of Vic), LL.M (Cantab) Contact: dgruber@mail.ubc.ca; (604) 661-9361 M-F 9:00 a.m. to
More informationIndexed As: McLean v. British Columbia Securities Commission
Patricia McLean (appellant) v. Executive Director of the British Columbia Securities Commission (respondent) and Financial Advisors Association of Canada and Ontario Securities Commission (interveners)
More informationMr. Justice Marc M. Monnin Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner
Citation: Northern Regional Health Authority v Manitoba Human Rights Commission et al, 2017 MBCA 98 Date: 20171005 Docket: AI16-30-08687 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Coram: Mr. Justice Marc M. Monnin
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Court File No. A-145-12 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA APPELLANT - and- CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY, ASSEMBLY OF FIRST
More informationThe Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know
The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know The Court and the OMB by: Dennis H. Wood and Johanna R. Myers June 2006 Municipal, Planning and Development Law 65 Queen Street West, Suite
More informationLarry Nicholas Estabrooks, Director of Consumer Affairs,
Citation : Estabrooks v. New Brunswick (Director of Consumer Affairs), 2016 NBFCST 11 PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK FINANCIAL AND CONSUMER SERVICES TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT, S.N.B.
More informationKeith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen (applicants) v. The University of Calgary (respondent) ( ; 2010 ABQB 644)
In The Matter Of Keith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen on Findings of Non-Academic Misconduct on Appeal from the Ad Hoc Review Committee of the General Faculties Council Keith Pridgen and Steven Pridgen (applicants)
More informationIndexed As: Canadian National Railway v. Seeley et al. Federal Court Mandamin, J. February 1, 2013.
Canadian National Railway (applicant) v. Denise Seeley and Canadian Human Rights Commission (respondents) and Ontario Human Rights Commission, Federally Regulated Employers - Transportation and Communication
More informationReview of Administrative Decisions Involving Charter Rights: The Shortcomings of the SCC Decision in Doré
Review of Administrative Decisions Involving Charter Rights: The Shortcomings of the SCC Decision in Doré February 24, 2014, OTTAWA Distinct But Overlapping: Administrative Law and the Charter Over the
More informationStanding: The Role of Administrative Tribunals on Judicial Review. Vancouver, British Columbia. May 9, 2013
Standing: The Role of Administrative Tribunals on Judicial Review Vancouver, British Columbia May 9, 2013 Master Heather MacNaughton, Supreme Court of British Columbia Jessica Connell, Counsel, British
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: British Columbia (Ministry of Justice) v. Maddock, 2015 BCSC 746 Date: 20150423 Docket: 14-3365 Registry: Victoria In the matter of the decisions of the
More informationv. Labourers International Union of North America, Local 615, Arbitrator Eric Slone J U D I C I A L R E V I E W
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Stavco Construction Limited v. Labourers International Union of North America, Local 615, 2018 NSSC 84 Date: 20180409 Docket: Hfx No. 466788 Registry: Halifax Between:
More informationDecision F08-07 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND CITIZENS SERVICES. David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner. July 24, 2008
Decision F08-07 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND CITIZENS SERVICES David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner July 24, 2008 Quicklaw Cite: [2008] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 25 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/other_decisions/decisionf08-07.pdf
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR MANITOBA)
BETWEEN: S.C.C. Court File No. 36583 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR MANITOBA) SIDNEY GREEN - and - THE LAW SOCIETY OF MANITOBA - and THE FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES
More informationPRINCE EDWARD ISLAND POPULATION REPORT 2017
OVERVIEW PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND POPULATION REPORT 2017 DIAGRAM 1: PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND POPULATION, AS OF JULY 1, 1998-2017 155,000 150,000 145,000 140,000 135,000 130,000 On September 27, 2017 Statistics
More informationPerspective National Administrative Law, Labour & Employment Law and Privacy & Thora Sigurdson Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Administrative Law Update A West Coast Perspective 2010 National Administrative Law, Labour & Employment Law and Privacy & Access Law Conference Thora Sigurdson Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Introduction
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationThe Exercise of Statutory Discretion
The Exercise of Statutory Discretion CACOLE Conference June 9, 2009 Professor Lorne Sossin University of Toronto, Faculty of Law R. Lester Jesudason Chair, Nova Scotia Police Review Board Tom Bell Counsel,
More informationIndexed As: Iyamuremye et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Shore, J. May 26, 2014.
Oscar Iyamuremye, Jean de Dieu Ntibeshya, Jeanine Umuhire et Karabo Greta Ineza (partie demanderesse) v. Le Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'immigration (partie défenderesse) (IMM-5282-13; 2014 CF 494;
More informationKhosa: Extending and Clarifying Dunsmuir
Khosa: Extending and Clarifying Dunsmuir Andrew Wray, Pinto Wray James LLP Christian Vernon, Pinto Wray James LLP [awray@pintowrayjames.com] [cvernon@pintowrayjames.com] Introduction The Supreme Court
More informationJAN E the person named as petitioner in the style of proceedings above SUPREME COURT VANCOUVER REGISTRY PETITION TO THE COURT
SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER REGISTRY JAN 18 2017 17.0 5 1 4 No. Vancouver Registry BETWEEN: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In the Matter of the decision of the Delegate of the
More informationSASKATCHEWAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW UPDATE
SASKATCHEWAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW UPDATE Larry Seiferling, Q.C., Partner, McDougall Gauley LLP Angela Giroux, Associate, McDougall Gauley LLP (a) Introduction There are few, if any, issues that have arisen
More informationIn the Court of Appeal of Alberta
In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Citation: Edmonton (Police Service) v Alberta (Law Enforcement Review Board), 2014 ABCA 267 Between: Chief of Police of the Edmonton Police Service - and - Law Enforcement
More informationPartners of the Pathways to Prosperity Partnership
Partners of the Pathways to Prosperity Partnership Universities Universities... 2 University- based Centres... 2 Settlement Organizations Service Providers... 2 Service Provider Umbrellas... 3 Research
More informationForm F5 Change of Information in Form F4 General Instructions
Form 33-109F5 Change of Information in Form 33-109F4 General Instructions 1. This notice must be submitted when notifying a regulator of changes to Form 33-109F6 or Form 33-109F4 information in accordance
More informationREVIEW REPORT FI December 29, 2015 Department of Finance
Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia Report of the Commissioner (Review Officer) Catherine Tully REVIEW REPORT FI-13-28 December 29, 2015 Department of Finance Summary: The
More informationLitigating Charter Rights: The Experience of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
Advanced Workers Compensation Advocacy Litigating Charter Rights: The Experience of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal David Stratas Heenan Blaikie LLP Monday May 10, 2004 Ontario Bar
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Rogers Communications Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35 DATE: 20120712 DOCKET: 33922 BETWEEN: Rogers Communications Inc.,
More informationR. v. Conway: UnChartered Territory for Administrative Tribunals
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 54 (2011) Article 16 R. v. Conway: UnChartered Territory for Administrative Tribunals Christopher D. Bredt Ewa Krajewska
More informationWillis & Winkler on Leading Labour Cases 2010
Willis & Winkler on Leading Labour Cases 2010 Elaine B. Willis Warren K. Winkler Canada Law Book A Division of The Cartwright Group Ltd. 240 Edward St., Aurora, Ontario, L4G 3S9 www.canadalawbook.ca #THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Construction Labour Relations v. Driver Iron Inc., 2012 SCC 65 DATE: 20121129 DOCKET: 34205 BETWEEN: Construction Labour Relations - An Alberta Association Appellant and
More informationEmilian Peter (applicant) v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (respondent) (IMM ; 2014 FC 1073)
Emilian Peter (applicant) v. The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (respondent) (IMM-12508-12; 2014 FC 1073) Indexed As: Peter v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT FERRIER, SWINTON & LEDERER JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Applicant.
CITATION: St. Catharines (City v. IPCO, 2011 ONSC 346 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 351/09 DATE: 20110316 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT FERRIER, SWINTON & LEDERER JJ. B E T W E E N: THE
More informationGLAHOLT LLP CONSTRUCTION LAWYERS
Choosing Arbitration Arbitration of construction industry disputes is: Based on contract. The power of an arbitrator, or arbitration panel, to decide your dispute must be granted to the arbitrator by the
More informationCASL Constitutional Challenge An Overview
McCarthy Tétrault Advance Building Capabilities for Growth CASL Constitutional Challenge An Overview Charles Morgan Direct Line: 514-397-4230 E-Mail: cmorgan@mccarthy.ca October 24, 2016 Overview Freedom
More informationThe Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (appellant) v. Thanh Tam Tran (respondent) (A ; 2015 FCA 237)
The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (appellant) v. Thanh Tam Tran (respondent) (A-531-14; 2015 FCA 237) Indexed As: Tran v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
More informationAs soon as possible in s. 48(2) of IRPA: Not possible to Enforce Removals in Breach of the Rule of Law and the Charter
As soon as possible in s. 48(2) of IRPA: Not possible to Enforce Removals in Breach of the Rule of Law and the Charter Presented at the Canadian Bar Association 2014 National Immigration Law Conference
More informationSupreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada Statistics - Supreme Court of Canada (2018) ISSN 1193-8536 (Print) ISSN 1918-8358 (Online) Photograph: Philippe Landreville 02. Introduction 04. The Appeal Process in the Supreme
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53 DATE: 20111028 DOCKET: 33507 BETWEEN: Canadian Human Rights Commission and Donna Mowat
More informationTHE FALSE ALLURE OF ARBITRATION APPEALS
THE FALSE ALLURE OF ARBITRATION APPEALS Presented by: Joel Richler, FCIArb. Bay Street Chambers Ann Ryan Robertson, FCIArb. Locke Lord LLP David P. Jones, Q.C., C.Arb. de Villars Jones LLP The False Allure
More informationProceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992
Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 Dianna Louise Parsons, Michael Herbert Cruickshanks, David Tull, Martin Henry Griffen, Anna Kardish, Elsie Kotyk, Executrix of the Estate of Harry Kotyk,
More informationPage: 2 In the Matter of In the Matter of the Workers Compensation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c.w-15, As Amended ( WCA ) And in the Matter of a Decision by the
Court of Queen s Bench of Alberta Citation: Homes by Avi Ltd. v. Alberta (Workers Compensation Board, Appeals Commission), 2007 ABQB 203 Date: 20070326 Docket: 0603 14909, 0603 14405, 0603 12833 Registry:
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Origin: Appeal from a decision of the Master of the Court of Queen's Bench, dated June 5, 2013 Date: 20131213 Docket: CI 13-01-81367 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: Jewish Community Campus of Winnipeg Inc.
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And And Before: Burnaby (City) v. Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC, 2014 BCCA 465 City of Burnaby Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC The National Energy Board
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Cal-terra Developments Ltd. v. Hunter, 2017 BCSC 1320 Date: 20170728 Docket: 15-4976 Registry: Victoria Re: Judicial Review Procedure Act, R.S.B.C. 1996,
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Scott v. British Columbia (The Police Complaint Commissioner), 2017 BCSC 961 Jason Scott Date: 20170609 Docket: S164838 Registry: Vancouver
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Bresson v.nova Scotia (Community Services), 2016 NSSC 64. v. Nova Scotia (Department of Community Service)
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Bresson v.nova Scotia (Community Services), 2016 NSSC 64 Date: 20160118 Docket: SYD No. 443281 Registry: Sydney Between: Jainey Lee Bresson v. Nova Scotia (Department
More informationIndexed As: Kandola v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court of Appeal Noël, Mainville and Webb, JJ.A. March 31, 2014.
The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (appellant) v. Nanakmeet Kaur Kandola by her guardian at law Malkiat Singh Kandola (respondent) (A-154-13; 2014 FCA 85) Indexed As: Kandola v. Canada (Minister
More informationPRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
a55 PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Fifth Edition by David Philip Jones, Q.C. B.A.(Hons.) (McGill), B.C.L., M.A. (Oxon.) and Anne S. de Villars, Q.C. B.Sc. (Southampton), LL.B. (Alberta) both of de Villars
More informationTerritorial Mobility Agreement
i Territorial Mobility Agreement November 2011 FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES OF CANADA November, 2011 Introduction The purpose of this Agreement is to extend the scope of the National Mobility Agreement
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
November 22, 2005 2005-007 NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER REPORT 2005-007 Intergovernmental Affairs Secretariat Summary: The Applicant applied under the Access
More informationJustice Wilson s Administrative Law Legacy: The National Corn Growers Decision and Judicial Review of Administrative Decision-Making
The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 41 (2008) Article 11 Justice Wilson s Administrative Law Legacy: The National Corn Growers Decision and Judicial Review
More informationREQUEST FOR BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION Opportunity for arbitrators to be selected for the Canadian Transportation Agency rosters Table of Contents A. Contact Information... 2 B. Education... 3 C. Arbitration
More informationSyllabus. Canadian Constitutional Law
Syllabus Canadian Constitutional Law (Revised February 2015) Candidates are advised that the syllabus may be updated from time-to-time without prior notice. Candidates are responsible for obtaining the
More informationJurisdiction: Various Issues
Jurisdiction: Various Issues By Brad Armstrong, Q.C. July 21, 2009 These materials were prepared for the conference Administrative Law: Key Concepts and Thorny Issues, hosted by Pacific Business & Law
More informationSupreme Court of Canada considers sanctions imposed by Securities Regulators -- Re: Cartaway Resources Corp, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 672 Douglas Worndl
Supreme Court of Canada considers sanctions imposed by Securities Regulators -- Re: Cartaway Resources Corp, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 672 Douglas Worndl February 2005 In April of 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada
More informationTHE NOVA SCOTIA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION BOARD OF INQUIRY. Tony Smith. -and- Capital District Health Authority. -and-
THE NOVA SCOTIA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION BOARD OF INQUIRY BETWEEN: Tony Smith -and- Capital District Health Authority -and- Nova Scotia Human Rights Case Number: 42000-30 H10-1931 Preliminary Decision on
More informationOBSERVATION. TD Economics A DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA
OBSERVATION TD Economics May 1, 213 A DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA Highlights New data from the National Household Survey (NHS) show that just over 1.4 million people identified
More informationCase Name: Cuddy Chicks Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board)
Page 1 Case Name: Cuddy Chicks Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board) Cuddy Chicks Limited, appellant; v. Ontario Labour Relations Board and United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: Langley (Township) v. De Raadt, 2014 BCSC 650 Date: 20140415 Docket: S136273 Registry: Vancouver The Corporation of the Township of Langley Petitioner
More informationReport to Convocation February 25, Interjurisdictional Mobility Committee
Report to Convocation February 25, 2010 Interjurisdictional Mobility Committee Committee Members Paul Henderson (Chair) Glenn Hainey (Vice-Chair) Thomas Conway Carl Fleck Susan McGrath Purpose of Report:
More informationPRIVACY DURING A HEARING: ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL DOCUMENTS
PRIVACY DURING A HEARING: ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL DOCUMENTS by Tamara L. Hunter Associate Counsel, Head of the Privacy Law Compliance Group, Davis LLP for 2010 Canadian Bar Association National Administrative
More informationReading and Understanding Case Reports: A Guide for Self-Represented Litigants. Margarita Dvorkina & Julie Macfarlane
Reading and Understanding Case Reports: A Guide for Self-Represented Litigants Margarita Dvorkina & Julie Macfarlane The National Self-Represented Litigants Project September 2017 Table of Contents Before
More informationArticle. Migration: Interprovincial, 2009/2010 and 2010/2011. by Nora Bohnert
Report on the Demographic Situation in Canada Article Migration: Interprovincial, 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 by Nora Bohnert July, 2013 How to obtain more information For information about this product or
More informationWilman v. Northwest Territories (Financial Management Board..., 1997 CarswellNWT CarswellNWT 81, [1997] N.W.T.J. No. 17
1997 CarswellNWT 81 Northwest Territories Supreme Court Wilman v. Northwest Territories (Financial Management Board Secretariat) David Wilman, Applicant and The Commissioner of the Northwest Territories
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: Gorenshtein v. British Columbia (Employment Standards Tribunal), 2013 BCSC 1499 Date: 20130819 Docket: S130604 Registry: Vancouver Tatiana Gorenshtein
More informationDecision-makers under new scrutiny: sufficiency of reasons and timely decision-making
Decision-makers under new scrutiny: sufficiency of reasons and timely decision-making David Stratas When people think about our justice system, they often only think about courts and the justice that courts
More informationIndexed As: Mounted Police Association of Ontario et al. v. Canada (Attorney General)
Mounted Police Association of Ontario/Association de la Police Montée de l'ontario and B.C. Mounted Police Professional Association on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of the Royal Canadian
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 DATE: 20080307 DOCKET: 31459 BETWEEN: David Dunsmuir Appellant v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: West Vancouver Police Department v. British Columbia (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2016 BCSC 934 Date: 20160525 Docket: S152619 Registry: Vancouver
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Lymburner v. Nova Scotia (Health and Wellness) 2016 NSSC 23
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Lymburner v. Nova Scotia (Health and Wellness) 2016 NSSC 23 Date: 20160118 Docket: Hfx No. 435272 Registry: Halifax Between: Dr. Dana Lymburner v. Applicant Her Majesty
More informationSpeech given by the Honourable Justice William J. Vancise Chairman of the Copyright Board of Canada
Speech given by the Honourable Justice William J. Vancise Chairman of the Copyright Board of Canada The Law Society of Upper Canada 12 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Year in Review Ottawa, Ontario
More informationThe Precautionary Principle in Canada
Murray & Anne Fraser Building PO Box 2400 STN CSC Victoria, BC V8W 3H7 Phone: 250.721.8188 Email: elc@uvic.ca Web: www.elc.uvic.ca The Precautionary Principle in Canada A. Introduction The 2009 film festival
More informationNational Mobility Agreement
National Mobility Agreement Federation of Law Societies of Canada / Fédération des ordres professionnels de juristes du Canada 480-445, boulevard Saint-Laurent Montreal, Quebec H2Y 2Y7 Tel (514) 875-6350
More informationSa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Adjudant J.G.A. Gagnon (intimé)
Sa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Adjudant J.G.A. Gagnon (intimé) Sa Majesté la Reine (appelante) v. Caporal A.J.R. Thibault (intimé) (CMAC-577; CMAC-581; 2015 CMAC 2; 2015 CACM 2) Indexed As: R. v. Gagnon
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Lévis (City) v. Fraternité des policiers de Lévis Inc., 2007 SCC 14 DATE: 20070322 DOCKET: 31103 BETWEEN: City of Lévis Appellant and Fraternité des policiers de Lévis
More informationThe Canadian Institute ADVANCED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PRACTICE May 1 and 2, 2008
The Canadian Institute ADVANCED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PRACTICE May 1 and 2, 2008 MANAGING YOUR MULTIPLE ROLES AS TRIBUNAL COUNSEL By Gilbert Van Nes, General Counsel & Settlement Officer Alberta Environmental
More informationLegal Considerations Regarding the Use of Electronic Contracts and Signatures. Ravi Shukla Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Legal Considerations Regarding the Use of Electronic Contracts and Signatures Ravi Shukla Fogler, Rubinoff LLP Legal Considerations Regarding the Use of Electronic Contracts and Signatures Provincial and
More informationTHE ROAD TO THE PROMISED LAND RUNS PAST CONWAY: ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES 783 THE ROAD TO THE PROMISED LAND RUNS PAST CONWAY: ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND CHARTER REMEDIES RANJAN K. AGARWAL * I. INTRODUCTION In the 30 years since
More informationImmigrant and Temporary Resident Children in British Columbia
and Temporary Resident Children in British Columbia January 2011 During the five-year period from 2005 to 2009, on average, approximately 40,000 immigrants arrived in B.C. annually and approximately 7,900
More information1. Where is your company located? Please check all that apply.
Appendix F: Surveys of employers 1. Where is your company located? Please check all that apply. Vancouver British Columbia (outside of Vancouver) Alberta Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut Saskatchewan
More informationAlberta Immigrant Highlights. Labour Force Statistics. Highest unemployment rate for landed immigrants 9.8% New immigrants
2016 Labour Force Profiles in the Labour Force Immigrant Highlights Population Statistics Labour Force Statistics Third highest percentage of landed immigrants in the working age population 1. 34. ON 2.
More informationInquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Inquiry of the Special Advisor on Federal Court Prothonotaries Compensation
More informationDemographic and Economic Trends and Issues Canada, Ontario and the GTA
Demographic and Economic Trends and Issues Canada, Ontario and the GTA Presented by Tom McCormack The Centre for Spatial Economics www.c4se.com Presented to Professional Marketing Research Society Toronto
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEAL) WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. - and
COURT FILE NO. 36300 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: AND BETWEEN: WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL - and FRASER HEALTH AUTHORITY, KATRINA
More informationALBERTA OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER ORDER F July 7, 2017 EDMONTON POLICE SERVICE. Case File Number F5536
ALBERTA OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER ORDER F2017-57 July 7, 2017 EDMONTON POLICE SERVICE Case File Number F5536 Office URL: www.oipc.ab.ca Summary: On June 16, 2010, the Criminal
More information