THE ROHINGYA REFUGEE CRISIS IN INDIA
|
|
- Rudolph Jackson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE ROHINGYA REFUGEE CRISIS IN INDIA Brihad Ralhan 1 The 1.1 million Rohingya people residing in Myanmar have always been surrounded by controversy. They have co-existed alongside Buddhists and have done so uneasily, for a long time. Myanmar rendered the Rohingya people stateless in 1982 and stripped them of their citizenship. The same people have been victims of communal violence taking place in Myanmar as well. They have, through many years, faced consistent and systematic human rights violations in the country due to the existing communal division. However, things worsened a lot more in when the Rohingya people were made victims of a military crackdown in Myanmar. Due to the rising tension in the State, thousands of Rohingya people fled to neighbouring countries, seeking refuge from persecution. More than 40,000 of these are known to be residing in India currently. These people have been travelling, with little food and water supply, dangerously on the high-seas in order to reach the nearest port away from Myanmar, where they face serious threats to their safety. Out of the 40,000 residing in India, 16,500 have been registered with The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [Herein after UNHCR ] Since India does not have a codified refugee law, UNCHR handles the in-take of refugees in the country through its own registration process. Recently, the Government announced its intention to deport all 40,000 Rohingya refugees living in India, including the 16,500 registered ones. This has led to a petition being filed before the Hon ble Supreme Court of India by 2 registered Rohingya refugees. The Union of India claims that since it is not a signatory to the United Nations [Herein after UN ] Convention on Refugees related to Status of Refugees, 1951, the recommendations or the selection process of the UNCHR is not binding on it and hence it can deport all the refugees living in the country. This article, from a neutral standpoint, tries to summarise the possible arguments from both sides of this case with a brief opinion based solution at the end. The arguments brought forward by the petitioners may consist of the following. 1 2nd Year BLS LLB Student, Government Law College, Mumbai 1 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
2 1. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND NON-REFOULEMENT: They may mainly rely upon two fundamental rights viz. Article 14 and Article 21 guaranteed in the Indian Constitution which applies equally to both Indians as well as foreign nationals, including refugees. Article 14 Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Article 21 Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Time and again, the High Courts and the Supreme Court have pronounced judgments to protect the liberty of refugees. By the use of the said two articles, courts have tried to further liberalise the rights of refugees. Non-refoulement is an accepted customary international law which may be defined as the practice of not forcing refugees or asylum seekers to return to a country in which they are liable to be subjected to persecution. In the case of Ktaer Abbas Habib Al Qutaifi v. Union of India &Ors. 2, non-refoulement was recognized under Article 21 by the Gujarat High Court. India though not a signatory to the 1951 Convention, takes upon itself the responsibility under Article 51 of its Constitution, which is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Article 51 (c) Foster respect for international law and treaty obligations in the dealings of organised peoples with one another; and encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration. Hence, non-refoulement, which is a customary international principle, is to be followed by India since it is important in the international jurisprudence Cri.L.J P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
3 The Hon ble Supreme Court, in NHRC v. State of Andhra Pradesh 3 held that the Constitutional sway in India embodies right to equality and ensures the right to a dignified life to all citizens as well as non-citizens. On the basis of the principle of non-refoulement, the Court directed against the refoulement of Chakma refugees, who were the nationals of Bangladesh. Again, in the case of Syed Ata Mohammadi v. Union of India, 4 the Bombay High Court pointed out that the Iranian refugees cannot be sent back to Iran, where they face the fear of persecution. The Supreme Court has stayed deportation of refugees in a number of cases such as Maiwand s Trust of Afghan Human Freedom v. State of Punjab 5 ; and N.D. Pancholi vs. State of Punjab & Others. 6 These cases along with numerous more illustrate how the judiciary has declared nonrefoulement as existent under Article 21 of the Constitution, taking into consideration the international customary laws. Furthermore, Article 14 of the Indian Constitution is at risk of being violated in case the Rohingyas are deported. This argument is two-fold. The first part deals with the right to be heard enjoyed by a foreign national RIGHT TO BE HEARD: In Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency 7, the Supreme Court gave an absolute power to the Government to throw out foreigners. The same was upheld by the Supreme Court in Mr. Louis De Raedt & Ors v. Union of India. 8 However, in the same judgment, the Court also held that foreigners have due process rights and the right to be heard. In the present case, the members of the Rohingya community are being threatened to be deported without first being heard, which is also a breach of audi alteram partem, a principle of natural justice SCC (1) Criminal writ petition no. 7504/1994 at the Bombay High Court 5 Crl. WP No.125 & 126 of WP (civil) No of 1987, unreported) SCR (1) SCR (3) P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
4 There exist certain exceptions, as provided in Article 33(2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, to non-refoulement and rights of the refugees on the basis of two grounds: (i) National Security; and (ii) Public Order. Hence, if there is a threat to either the national security or the public order of the country, the refugees can be deported as the State has to perform its duty towards the nation and itscitizens by maintaining law and order. In view of the serious consequences to a refugee of being returned to a country where he is in danger of persecution, the exception provided for in Article 33(2) should be applied with the greatest caution. It is necessary to take fully into account all the circumstances of the case and, where the refugee has been convicted of a serious criminal offence, to any mitigating factors and the possibilities of rehabilitation and reintegration within society. 9 The Union of India, in the current case, may argue that Rohingya people, if allowed to live to continue to stay in India, may be exposed to terror groups and thereby breed terrorism in an already volatile-region, i.e. Jammu and Kashmir, where a chunk of the Rohingya population currently resides. However, this may not be fully credible and deporting the entire community of 40,000 people from the country based on the same, even if credible, would be blatant ignorance and erred judgment on part of the Government, especially since UNHCR in India, carries out a Refugee Status Determination (RSD) process which starts with registration as asylum seekers, following which, it conducts interviews with each individual asylum seeker accompanied by a qualified interpreter. This process provides areasoned decision on whether refugee status is granted or not. 10 In the case of P. Nedumaran v. Union Of India 11 before the Madras High Court, some refugees, originally from Sri Lanka, prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the Union of India and the State of Tamil Nadu to permit UNHCR officials to check the voluntariness of the refugees in going back to Sri Lanka and to allow those refugees who did not want to go back, to continue to stay in India. The Hon ble Court held that since the UNHCR was 9 Note on Non-Refoulement (Submitted by the High Commissioner) By UNHCR EC/SCP/2 August UNHCR website. See (last accessed on 26/9/2017) 11 MANU/AP/0367/ P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
5 involved in ascertaining the voluntariness of the refugees return to Sri Lanka, hence being a World Agency, it is not for the Court to consider whether the consent is voluntary or not. The Court went on to acknowledge the impartiality, non-biasness and competence of the UNHCR officials. Hence, since the UNHCR registers refugees on a case by case basis, the Government, based on a few intelligence reports cannot deport the entire Rohingya community en masse and disregard the standard operating procedure followed by UNHCR, which has been recognized by the courts UNREASONABLE CLASSIFICATION: The second part of this argument deals with segregation, without the existence of a discernible reason, of Rohingya people, from the rest seeking refuge in India. In the case of Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi 12, it was observed thus: If the classification is not reasonable and does not satisfy the two conditions referred to above [(i) that the classification is founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others left out of the group; and (ii) that differentia has a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the impugned legislative or executive action], the impugned legislative or executive action would plainly be arbitrary and the guarantee of equality under Article 14 would be breached. Hence, the Government s classification of refugees needs to be based on intelligible differentia. In the present case, there seems to be no rationale behind separating Rohingyas from the rest of the refugees of the country. The burden of proof in this situation lies on the Government to prove as to why Rohingya refugees, including the ones registered with UNHCR, are the ones not getting the same protection as the other refugees. The same classification, if based on communal grounds, is a serious violation of the provisions of the Indian Constitution which does not discriminate on the basis of religion. The said classification and the act of deporting the Rohingya community may be an arbitrary action on part of the State, since linking terrorist activities to the entire community without any evidence is not a sufficient ground for singling out the Rohingyas. Furthermore, isolated cases of public disorder due to clashes between the locals and Rohingyas may not be taken as 12 (1981) 1 SCC P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
6 a justification to deport the entire community of 40,000 people back to Myanmar where they may face serious threats to their safety. 2. CONVENTIONS SIGNED BY INDIA: Even though India is not a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Status ofrefugees, it is a signatory to several other conventions which place an obligation upon itto not deport the Rohingyas in the present case.the petitioners may argue that India, by signing these conventions/principles, has shownits intent to legislate upon the same and has shown its agreement in implementing thesame. A signature, subject to ratification/acceptance/approval, is a means of authentication and expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMANE OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT: While India is a signatory to this convention, it has not ratified the same yet. Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights. 13 Arts.10 and 18, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
7 Over the last few years, Anti-Rohingya riots took place throughout Myanmar, wherein, reportedly, many Rohingyas were killed. It was also reported by international organisations that the State police and armed forces tortured the Rohingyas. Keeping these considerations in mind, India should detect the consistent violation ofhuman rights in Myanmar and not forcibly expel the Rohingyas. 2.2.INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE: India is a signatory to this convention, but has not ratified the same. Article No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler"), surrender or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he or she would be in danger of being subjected to enforced disappearance. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations, including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights or of serious violations of international humanitarian law. Enforced disappearance is defined as the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law. 14 In the present scenario, the State of Myanmar, through its agents, has deprived the Rohingyas of their liberty. Hence, since substantial grounds exist for believing that Rohingyas may face the threat of enforced disappearance in Myanmar, India should consider the same and not deport them. 14 Article 2, International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance 7 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
8 2.3. ASIAN AFRICAN LEGAL CONSULTATIVE ORGANIZATION S (AALCO) 1996 BANGKOK PRINCIPLES ON STATUS AND TREATMENT OF REFUGEES: India is a signatory to the said principles. Article III 1. No one seeking asylum in accordance with these Principles shall be subjected to measures such as rejection at the frontier, return or expulsion which would result in his life or freedom being threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. The provision as outlined above may not however be claimed by a person when there are reasonable grounds to believe the person s presence is a danger to the national security or public order of the country in which he is, or who, having been convicted by a final judgement of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of that country. 2. In cases where a State decides to apply any of the above-mentioned measures to a person seeking asylum, it should grant provisional asylum under such conditions as it may deem appropriate, to enable the person thus endangered to seek asylum in another country. When the Rohingyas try to seek asylum by entering into India, they should not be rejected at the frontier, returned or expelled, especially if doing so would result in the lives of such persons being threatened. The Rohingyas who tried fleeing to India, used boats to travel on the high seas and international waters which were ill-equipped for the journey. The exception of national security being at risk demands reasonable reasons for believingthat there indeed is a threat in the person s presence. When these boats were being overturned killing hundreds and the people were merely seeking refuge, there is no reason for the Indian Navy to believe that such persons could be linked to terrorist activities without any evidence INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS: India has acceded to this convention. Article 7 8 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
9 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experiment. Article 13 An alien lawfully in the territory of a State Party to the present Covenant may be expelled therefrom only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with law and shall, except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, be allowed to submit the reasons against his expulsion and to have his case reviewed by, and be represented for the purpose before, the competent authority or a person or persons especially designated by the competent authority. In the present case, there are substantial grounds for believing that the Rohingyas, if expelled, would face a real risk of irreparable harm. This is clear from the fact that, since decades, Rohingyas have faced issues and that recently, in , with the military crackdown, they face significant risks. Article 13 of the said convention also protects the right to be heard and due process rights of refugees before being deported UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: Article Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. 2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from nonpolitical crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. India has agreed to the provision which grants persons the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution. Hence, being a part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, India must not ignoreits responsibility owed towards Rohingyas, who seek asylum from persecution. 9 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
10 2.6. CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD: Article 22 States Parties shall take appropriate measures to ensure that a child who is seeking refugee status or who is considered a refugee in accordance with applicable international or domestic law and procedures shall, whether unaccompanied or accompanied by his or her parents or by any other person, receive appropriate protection and humanitarian assistance in the enjoyment of applicable rights set forth in the present Convention and in other international human rights or humanitarian instruments to which the said States are Parties. This convention, as ratified by India, lays down that State parties should unconditionally ensure that a child who is seeking refugee status or who is a refugee shall receive protection and assistance in the enjoyment of rights in the present convention as well as inother instruments to which the said State is a party. Thus, India owes an unconditional duty of care towards the Rohingya children seeking refuge in the country. The above mentioned conventions and the relevant articles as reproduced all talk about creating an obligation on the State parties to not expel or deport people seeking refuge,against their consent, if there is a risk of being subjected to irreparable harm and persecution after being deported. While it is true that these conventions are not directly enforceable in an Indian court of law and that the judiciary itself is not empowered to make legislations, it is free and empowered to interpret the obligations of India under international law into the municipal laws of the country in passing a judgment when dealing with cases involving questions of international law. This is made possible through Article 51 of the Constitution. The same can be confirmed by the words of S.M. Sikri, C.J. in the case of Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala 15 - It seems to me that, in view of Article 51 of the directive principles, this Court must interpret language of the Constitution, if not intractable, which is after all a municipal law, in the light of the United Nations Charter and the solemn declaration subscribed to by India. 15 (1973) Supp. SCR 1 10 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
11 Also, in the case of Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla 16, the Supreme Court broadened the scope of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution by referring to Articles 862 and 963 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India and Others, 17 the Court held Even otherwise, once these principles are accepted as part of the Customary International Law there would be no difficulty in accepting them as part of the domestic law. It is almost accepted proposition of law that the rules of Customary International Law which are not contrary to the municipal law shall be deemed to have been incorporated in the domestic law and shall be followed by the Courts of Law. The authorities cited above seek to implement the relevant provisions of the conventions to which India is a party. Hence, the Hon ble Supreme Court is fully empowered to grant the relief sought by the petitioner and the same may not be questioned. In addition to the above conventions, India has signed one more convention which may be brought into the picture here, i.e. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Article 98 of the same is as follows: 1. Every State shall require the master of a ship flying its flag, in so far as he can do so without serious danger to the ship, the crew or the passengers: (a) to render assistance to any person found at sea in danger of being lost; (b) to proceed with all possible speed to the rescue of persons in distress, if informed of their need of assistance, in so far as such action may reasonably be expected of him; (c) after a collision, to render assistance to the other ship, its crew and its passengers and, where possible, to inform the other ship of the name of his own ship, its port of registry and the nearest port at which it will call. 2. Every coastal State shall promote the establishment, operation and maintenance of an adequate and effective search and rescue service regarding safety on and over the sea and, where circumstances so require, by way of mutual regional arrangements cooperate with neighbouring States for this purpose. 16 AIR 1976 SC AIR 1996 SC P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
12 India, being a signatory to this convention, is obligated to reasonably assist and rescue all persons found at sea in danger of being lost or in distress. Since the pattern of Rohingyas dying at the high seas due to lack of supplies and ill-equipped boats was clear, the Indian Navy is obligated in offering assistance to such persons as the same is reasonably expected by the refugees from the Indian Navy. They must hence not be sent back and instead be offered the assistance they require. While the above contentions stand strong, the respondent to the current case, the Union of India, has many counter-contentions it could rely upon. The Government of India has relied upon the fact that there exists a lot of tension between Rohingyas and the other communities within India itself. It has shown its concern over the fact that an influx of Rohingya refugees to areas such as Jammu and Kashmir may change the demographic pattern of the already controversial and volatile area. It may also contend that keeping 40,000 refugees involves spending of a lot of resources of the Government and that such expenditure should be undertaken by the executive based on its own will and shall hence not be forced upon it by the judiciary. The 23,500 Rohingya refugees who are not registered with the UNCHR may be deemed as illegal immigrants. A foreigner who enters into or stays in any area in India without valid documents required for such stay, as the case may be, can be proceeded against under Section 14A(b) of the Foreigners Act, India follows the principle of dualism where no treaty can be enforced before it is incorporated into domestic law. In the State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd, 18 the court ruled that It is true that the doctrine of 'Monism' as prevailing in the European countries does not prevail in India. The doctrine of 'Dualism' is applicable. But, where the municipal law does not limit the extent of the statute, even if India is not a signatory to the relevant International Treaty or Covenant, the Supreme Court in a large number of cases interpreted the statutes keeping in view the same. Again, A treaty entered into by India cannot become law of the land and it cannot be implemented unless Parliament passes a law as required under Article AIR SCW P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
13 Furthermore, Section 3(2) (c) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 states thus: 3. Power to make orders. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers, orders made under this section may provide that the foreigner (c) shall not remain in India, or in any prescribed area therein; (cc) shall, if he has been required by order under this section not to remain in India, meet from any resources at his disposal the cost of his removal from India and of his maintenance therein pending such removal; Section 3(2) (c) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 empowers the Central Government to deport foreigners from the country if they come to adverse notice or their presence in the country is considered to be against the national interests. The Foreigners Act, therefore, confers the power to expel foreigners from India and such power is absolute and unfettered and no interference could be made with respect to the subjective satisfaction the Union regarding their decision to deport a foreign national. In the case of Ananda Bhavani (a) Geethanando, Ananda Ashram, Pondicherry Vs Union of India, 19 the court said that if the presence of some constitutes threat to the national security then their deportation order, without hearing will not be considered the violation of principle of natural justice. It may here be contended by the Union of India, that since there exists a threat to public order, principles of natural justice may not be considered before deporting the refugees. In Dough Lian Kham &Anr v. Union of India &Anr 20 the Supreme of Court of India ruled- The Fundamental Right of a foreigner/refugee is only confined to Article 21, i.e. the right to life and liberty and does not include the right to reside and settle in India, which right is only applicable to the citizens of the country. The power of the Indian Government to expel foreigners is absolute and unlimited and there is no provision in the Constitution of India or other law, putting fetters on the aforesaid discretion of the Government MLW (Crl.) WP (CRL) 1884 of P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
14 The principle of "non-refoulement", which prohibits expulsion of a refugee, who apprehends threat in his native country on account of his race, religion and political opinion, is required to be taken as part of the guarantee under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, as "nonrefoulement" affects/protects the life and liberty of a human being, irrespective of his nationality. This protection is available to a refugee but it must not be at the expense of national security. Also, the Apex Court in a number of landmark judgments has decried the practice of enforcing international conventions through the courts. Hence, the Judiciary has itself laid down decisions in favour of judicial restraint vis-a-vis judicial overreach. India s policy on geopolitics is not a domain for the court to decide. Its friendly relations with Myanmar may get affected and may thereby cause turbulence and turmoil in the South-Asian region for the entrenchment of the court in passing a writ of mandamus interfering with the executive s decision. In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 21 the judges held that there are certain situations where the political element dominates and judicial review is not possible. Ahmadi J. said that it was tough to evolve judicially manageable norms to scrutinize the political decisions and if the courts do it, they would be questioning political wisdom, which they must avoid. After having a look into the above mentioned possible contentions from both the sides, it is difficult to say that one is absolutely right over the other. The Hon ble Supreme Court of India, using judicial innovation, may set precedence for the future, through this highly complex case. There shall be no doubt that there exists a moral obligation on India to not forcibly expel the Rohingyas back to Myanmar. A possible solution of deporting to a thirdcountry may be considered by the Government, until which it may, in good faith, give basic assistance and protection to the Rohingya refugees. It should be considered by the Union of India that the 23,500 refugees who are yet to register with the UNHCR may not have the idea or the resources required to approach the offices of UNCHR and hence deporting them without giving them a fair chance is not ideal. It may also be noted that India has mostly always been welcoming of refuges seeking refuge in India. The country has absorbed far 21 (1994) 3 SCC (Jour) 1 14 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
15 more than 40,000 refugees in the past and the question of economic burden has never been brought up. While the laws and judgments on this case are divided, so are the opinions of the people of India. The Supreme Court of India may pass a judgment on the case soon, looking at the importance this case has received and the number of people that are involved and concerned. Perhaps, it is time that the Indian legislature comes forward and codifies a law on refugees and puts all questions of uncertainty regarding this matter to a much awaited peaceful end. 15 P a g e JOURNAL ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES OF LAW
REFUGEE LAW IN INDIA
An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 148 REFUGEE LAW IN INDIA Written by Cicily Martin 3rd year BA LLB Christ College INTRODUCTION The term refugee means a person who has been
More informationSUPREMO AMICUS VOLUME 4 ISSN has signed and which according to various judgements of Apex Court, must be read By Pareesh Virmani
the non-compliance of the mandate under REFUGEES AND HUMAN RIGHTS: A Article 14 & 21 as well as the requirements JURISPRUDENTIAL CONUNDRUM of international law and treaties which India OF ROHINGYA CRISIS
More informationAnalysis of Non-Refoulement Accordingly, the hypothesis would be The crucial role of non-refoulement has been internalized by the judiciary in India n
AN ANALYSIS OF NON-REFOULEMENT IN INDIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK Megha Purohit * & Mayank Purohit ** 1. Introduction According to Goodwin-Gill refouler, means to drive back or to repel, as of an enemy who fails
More informationThe Rights of Non-Citizens
The Rights of Non-Citizens Introduction Who is a Non-Citizen? In the human rights arena the most common definition for a non-citizen is: any individual who is not a national of a State in which he or she
More informationHans Muller of Nuremberg v. Supdt. Presidency Jail, Calcutta, (1955) 1 SCR 1284
Hans Muller of Nuremberg v. Supdt. Presidency Jail, Calcutta, (1955) 1 SCR 1284 Hans Muller of Nuremburg Versus Superintendent, Presidency Jail Calcutta and Others Petitioner Respondents (Under Article
More informationJOINT STATEMENT Thailand: Implement Commitments to Protect Refugee Rights End detention, forcible returns of refugees
JOINT STATEMENT Thailand: Implement Commitments to Protect Refugee Rights End detention, forcible returns of refugees (Bangkok, July 6, 2017) On the occasion of the United Nations High Commissioner for
More informationRefugee Law: Introduction. Cecilia M. Bailliet
Refugee Law: Introduction Cecilia M. Bailliet Mali Refugees Syrian Refugees Syria- Refugees and IDPs International Refugee Organization Refugee: Person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of
More informationINTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE. Preamble
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE Preamble The States Parties to this Convention, Considering the obligation of States under the Charter of the United
More informationInternational Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Preamble The States Parties to this Convention, Considering the obligation of States under the Charter of the United
More informationRefugee Protection Under the Constitution of Bangladesh: A Brief Overview
Introduction Refugee Protection Under the Constitution of Bangladesh: A Brief Overview By Nour Mohammad * The issues of refugee, forced migration and internally displaced persons are in much focus nowadays.
More informationThe Equal Rights Trust (ERT) Stakeholder Submission to the: Universal Periodic Review of The People s Republic of Bangladesh.
The Equal Rights Trust (ERT) Stakeholder Submission to the: Universal Periodic Review of The People s Republic of Bangladesh 9 October 2012 The Human Rights of Stateless Rohingya in Bangladesh 1. Introduction
More informationLEXKHOJ PUBLICATIONS
LEXKHOJ RESEARCH JOURNAL OF LAW & SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES ISSN: 2456-4524 VOLUME II ISSUE I Website:www.lexkhoj.com E-mail:lexkhoj@gmail.com LEXKHOJ PUBLICATIONS EDITORIAL NOTE Lexkhoj Publication is committed
More informationUNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations. On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees
UNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees 1 1. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) welcomes the opportunity
More informationCONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Page 1 of 11 CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment The States Parties to this Convention, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed
More informationRefugee Law In Hong Kong
Refugee Law In Hong Kong 1. International Refugee Law Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Geneva Convention as amended by the 1967 Protocol defines a refugee as any person who: owing to a well-founded fear of being
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief
More informationCONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE & OTHER CRUEL INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT and its Optional Protocol
CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE & OTHER CRUEL INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT and its Optional Protocol Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Cambodia OHCHR Convention
More information4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As Thailand continues in its endeavour to strike the right balance between protecting vulnerable migrants and effectively controlling its porous borders, this report
More informationPeople s Republic of China
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review: People s Republic of China I. BACKGROUND
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants
More informationL 111/20 Official Journal of the European Union
L 111/20 Official Journal of the European Union 4.5.2010 COUNCIL DECISION of 26 April 2010 supplementing the Schengen Borders Code as regards the surveillance of the sea external borders in the context
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS Dr.V.Ramaraj * Introduction International human rights instruments are treaties and other international documents relevant to international human rights
More informationSUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 8 PETITIONER: NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 8 PETITIONER: NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ANR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/01/1996 BENCH: AHMADI A.M. (CJ)
More informationPROCEDURAL STANDARDS IN EXAMINING APPLICATIONS FOR REFUGEE STATUS REGULATIONS
[S.L.420.07 1 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 420.07 REGULATIONS LEGAL NOTICE 243 of 2008. 3rd October, 2008 1. The title of these regulations is the Procedural Standards in Examining Applications for Refugee Status
More informationReport on the status of British residents held in Guantanamo Bay and the obligation on the UK government to provide them diplomatic support
Report on the status of British residents held in Guantanamo Bay and the obligation on the UK government to provide them diplomatic support By Asim Qureshi 12 th October 2005 Introduction The UK government,
More informationAppendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and
Appendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, 2006 1 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Principles applicable to refugee
More informationImmigration, Asylum and Refugee ASYLUM REGULATIONS 2008
Legislation made under s. 55. (LN. ) Commencement 2.10.2008 Amending enactments None Relevant current provisions Commencement date EU Legislation/International Agreements involved: Directive 2003/9/EC
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, August 2017
Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 22 September 2017 A/HRC/WGAD/2017/42 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular point (d) of Article 77(2) thereof,
27.6.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 189/93 REGULATION (EU) No 656/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 May 2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external
More informationDeclaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance
Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance Adopted by General Assembly resolution 47/133 of 18 December 1992 The General Assembly, Considering that, in accordance with the
More informationA guide to principles and practice as applied to migrants and refugees
IMO A guide to principles and practice as applied to migrants and refugees Introduction Sea-borne migrants and refugees are not a new phenomenon. Throughout the ages, people around the world have risked
More informationMigration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Bill 2009
Migration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Bill 2009 Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 28 September 2009 Queries regarding this submission should be directed
More informationAppendix II Draft comprehensive convention against international terrorism
Appendix II Draft comprehensive convention against international terrorism Consolidated text prepared by the coordinator for discussion* The States Parties to the present Convention, Recalling the existing
More informationConvention Relating to the Status of Refugees
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees Enacted by General Assembly Resolution 429 (V) Adopted 28 July 1951 As Amended by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees Enacted by General Assembly
More informationThe rights of non-citizens. Joint Statement addressed to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
International Commission of Jurists International Catholic Migration Commission The rights of non-citizens Joint Statement addressed to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Geneva,
More informationPREAMBLE The UN UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
PREAMBLE The UN UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom,
More informationGeneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees Page 1/22 Preamble The High Contracting Parties: Considering that the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights approved
More informationEuropean Convention on Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 Council of Europe Treaty Series, No. 5 Note on the text The text of the Convention is presented as amended by the provisions of
More information20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH
POLICY A FAIR GO FOR ALL 20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. Australia s policies towards asylum seekers and refugees should, at all times, reflect respect
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants
More informationReport of the Human Rights Council
A/61/53 United Nations Report of the Human Rights Council First session (19-30 June 2006 First special session (5-6 July 2006) Second special session (11 August 2006) General Assembly Official Records
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; the Special
More informationFIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 40229/98 by A.G. and Others
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report Universal Periodic Review: LIBYA I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Libya
More informationHandout 5.1 Key provisions of international and regional instruments
Key provisions of international and regional instruments A. Lawful arrest and detention Article 9 (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Everyone has the right to liberty and security
More informationRabbi Gbaba Speaks on Dual Citizenship in Liberia: I Support Dual Citizenship in Liberia Because the Merits Outweigh the Demerits!
Rabbi Gbaba Speaks on Dual Citizenship in Liberia: I Support Dual Citizenship in Liberia Because the Merits Outweigh the Demerits! Introduction I support dual citizenship in Liberia because I believe that
More informationProposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative approach to the flow of asylum seekers into and within the Asia-Pacific region
Proposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative approach to the flow of asylum seekers into and within the Asia-Pacific region Table of Contents Proposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative
More informationUzbekistan Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
Public amnesty international Uzbekistan Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Third session of the UPR Working Group of the Human Rights Council 1-12 December 2008 AI Index: EUR 62/004/2008] Amnesty
More informationWhat Are Human Rights?
1 of 5 11/23/2017, 7:35 PM What Are Human Rights? Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights
More informationConsideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention. Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 26 June 2012 Original: English CAT/C/ALB/CO/2 Committee against Torture Forty-eighth
More information1958 CONVENTION ON THE HIGH SEAS
Adopted at Geneva, Switzerland on 29 April 1958 [http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_1_1958_high_seas.pdf] ARTICLE 1...3 ARTICLE 2...3 ARTICLE 3...3 ARTICLE 4...4 ARTICLE
More informationCONTENTS. 1. Description and methodology Content and analysis Recommendations...17
Draft Report on Analysis and identification of existing gaps in assisting voluntary repatriation of rejected asylum seekers and development of mechanisms for their removal from the territory of the Republic
More information[UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION] Re: The Constitutional Court of Ecuador query regarding International Treaty No TI
17 April 2015 Re: The Constitutional Court of Ecuador query regarding International Treaty No. 0030-13-TI To The Honorable Wendy Molina Andrade, The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
More informationConcluding observations on the report submitted by Cuba under article 29 (1) of the Convention*
United Nations International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Distr.: General 19 April 2017 English Original: Spanish CED/C/CUB/CO/1 Committee on Enforced Disappearances
More informationCHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT
REFUGEES [CAP. 420. 1 CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT AN ACT to make provisions relating to and establishing procedures with regard to refugees and asylum seekers. ACT XX of 2000. 1st October, 2001 PART I General
More informationBELIZE REFUGEES ACT CHAPTER 165 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE REFUGEES ACT CHAPTER 165 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the
More informationExplanatory Report to the Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
European Treaty Series - No. 117 Explanatory Report to the Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Strasbourg, 22.XI.1984 Introduction l. Protocol No.
More informationBRIEF STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING PRISON SYSTEM AND INMATES IN INDIA
BRIEF STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING PRISON SYSTEM AND INMATES IN INDIA Priyadarshi Nagda University College of Law, MLS University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India ABSTRACT No nation of the world
More informationPRINCIPLES CONCERNING TREATMENT OF REFUGEES
189 ANNEXURE PRINCIPLES CONCERNING TREATMENT OF REFUGEES Definition of the term 'Refugee' A Refugee is a person who, owing to persecution or well-founded fear of prosecution for reasons of race, colour,
More informationACT ON AMENDMENDS TO THE ASYLUM ACT. Title I GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1
ACT ON AMENDMENDS TO THE ASYLUM ACT Title I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 This Act stipulates the principles, conditions and the procedure for granting asylum, subsidiary protection, temporary protection,
More informationIntroduction. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Policy on Migration
In 2007, the 16 th General Assembly of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies requested the Governing Board to establish a Reference Group on Migration to provide leadership
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr. GENERAL 5 February 2008 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE Thirty-ninth session
More informationIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL]
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL] Published by As it read between e 28th, 2012 and e 28th, 2012 Updated To: Important:
More informationStates Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder
States Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder March 1, 2011 According to news reports, more than 140,000 refugees have fled Libya in the wake of ongoing turmoil, a number that is expected
More informationConcluding observations on the third periodic report of Belgium*
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 3 January 2014 English Original: French CAT/C/BEL/CO/3 Committee against Torture
More informationAuthority and Responsibility of States
Authority and Responsibility of States Session III Nationality, Admission, Stay, Detention and Expulsion: the Balance between State Sovereignty and the Human Rights of Migrants Authority and Responsibility
More informationwith regard to the admission and residence of displaced persons on a temporary basis ( 6 ).
L 212/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7.8.2001 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced
More informationCONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee.
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL 4 August 1997 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report -
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review of: NEW ZEALAND I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
More informationInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
16 December 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment DECISION. Communication No. 281/2005
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr. RESTRICTED * CAT/C/38/D/281/2005 ** 5 June 2007 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE
More informationCompetences and Responsibilities of States. International Migration Law 1
Competences and Responsibilities of States International Migration Law 1 Competences and Responsibilities of States State sovereignty Sovereignty as a concept of international law has three major aspects:
More informationChapter 3: The Legal Framework
Chapter 3: The Legal Framework This Chapter provides an overview of the international legal framework that protects persons of concern to UNHCR; highlights the importance of national laws and institutions
More informationInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 23 March
More informationResolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/69/482)]
United Nations A/RES/69/152 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 February 2015 Sixty-ninth session Agenda item 61 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2014 [on the report of the Third
More informationIndia. Neerav Merchant. Majmudar & Partners Mumbai. Law firm bio
India Neerav Merchant Majmudar & Partners Mumbai nmerchant@majmudarindia.com Law firm bio 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses? At the outset, in
More informationAppendix B. States in South Asia have been hospitable towards refugees and continue to offer protection and assistance to large numbers of refugees.
Appendix B THE SOUTH ASIA DECLARATION ON REFUGEES Adopted by the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on Refugee and Migratory Movements in South Asia in January 2004 The Regional Consultation on Refugee and Migratory
More information...Chapter XI MONITORING AND PROTECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF RETURNEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS...
...Chapter XI MONITORING AND PROTECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF RETURNEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS... Key concepts United Nations human rights operations have an essential role to fill in monitoring
More informationCHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
26.10.2012 Official Journal of the European Union C 326/391 CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2012/C 326/02) C 326/392 Official Journal of the European Union 26.10.2012 PREAMBLE..........................................................
More informationCED/C/NLD/1. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
United Nations International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Distr.: General 29 July 2013 Original: English CED/C/NLD/1 Committee on Enforced Disappearances Consideration
More informationTHE INDIAN JURIST
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI 1 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.34251/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
More information4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions And Recommendations 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report provides an insight into the human rights situation of both the long-staying and recently arrived Rohingya population in Malaysia.
More informationList of issues in relation to the report submitted by Gabon under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention*
United Nations International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Distr.: General 18 April 2017 English Original: French English, French and Spanish only Committee on
More informationInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976
Selected Provisions Article 2 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976 1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to
More informationEuropean Convention on Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention is presented
More informationHuman Rights A Compilation of International Instruments
ST/HR/1/Rev. 6 (Vol. I/Part 1) Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Geneva Human Rights A Compilation of International Instruments Volume I (First Part) Universal Instruments
More informationNew Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices
New Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices Marie-Charlotte de Lapaillone The purpose of this report is to understand New Zealand s approach to its legal obligations concerning
More informationCommunication from Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Reference: G/SO 218/2
Stockholm 3 November 2014 UF2014/58264/UD/FMR Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Director-General for Legal Affairs Mr Mads Andenas Chair-Rapporteur for the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Office
More informationInternational covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/DZA/CO/3 12 December 2007 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Ninety-first session Geneva, 15
More informationProtecting the Rights of. Stateless Persons. The 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons
Protecting the Rights of Stateless Persons The 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons A Personal Appeal from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Today, millions of people
More informationA/HRC/32/L.5/Rev.1. General Assembly. ORAL REVISION 1 July. United Nations
United Nations General Assembly ORAL REVISION 1 July Distr.: Limited 1 July 2016 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-second session Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000
HUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2007 This is a revised edition of the law Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000 Arrangement HUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Arrangement
More informationCAT/C/48/D/414/2010. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 6 July 2012 CAT/C/48/D/414/2010 Original: English Committee against Torture Communication
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115
More informationCOMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POSITIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS IN AN IRREGULAR SITUATION
Strasbourg, 24 June 2010 CommDH/PositionPaper(2010)5 COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POSITIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS IN AN IRREGULAR SITUATION This is a collection of Positions on the rights of migrants
More informationCase comment. Punjab and Haryana High Court ruling on the prisoners right to procreate
Case comment Punjab and Haryana High Court ruling on the prisoners right to procreate Ms. Ankita Shukla 1 Convicts are not by mere reason of the conviction denuded of all the fundamental rights which they
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.4.2013 COM(2013) 197 final 2013/0106 (COD) C7-0098/13 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing rules for the surveillance of
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr. GENERAL 3 April 2006 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE Thirty-fifth session
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon ble The Chief Justice Jyotirmay Bhattacharya. AND The Hon ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay. MAT 901 of 2016
More informationarticle 22 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,
United Nations CAT/C/52/D/455/2011* Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Committee against Torture Communication No. 455/2011 Decision adopted by the
More information