Current Questions of Interpretation on the Dublin Regulation Art 10(1) and Art 16(3) in the Austrian Judiciary. Adel-Naim Reyhani
|
|
- Clinton Dean
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Current Questions of Interpretation on the Dublin Regulation Art 10(1) and Art 16(3) in the Austrian Judiciary By Adel-Naim Reyhani Cite As: Reyhani, A., (2012) Current Questions of Interpretation on the Dublin Regulation Art 10(1) and Art 16(3) Dublin Regulation in the Austrian Judiciary, Vol 1 LSEU, pp In recent months, the Austrian Asylum Court, which is the second and last instance court in asylum proceedings, has developed a body of case law concerning the Dublin Regulation in cases where a third-country national has left the territory of the MS without filing an asylum application in the Member State whose border he/she had irregularly crossed and subsequently entered Austria and filed an application for international protection. In the following sections of this paper, the Asylum Court s rationale in interpreting the respective Articles of the Dublin Regulation are analysed and an alternative interpretation argued. As a contextual introduction, the significance of this case law will be considered against the backdrop of the collapse of the Greek asylum system. KEYWORDS: Austrian Asylum; Dublin Regulation; Asylum Shopping The Dublin-System among other documents encompassing the Dublin Regulation as a successor of the Dublin Convention, the EURODAC Regulation as well as respective implementing provisions provides criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the MS by a third-country national. One of the principle reasons for creating such a system was to prevent a third-country national from submitting applications for international protection in multiple MS ( Asylum Shopping ). A second essential goal was to reduce the number of asylum seekers who are shuttled throughout the Dublin-Area ( Refugees in Orbit ). These objectives were based on the assumption that all MS operated similar and comparable quality standards in their asylum systems. Although the European Union launched several Directives aimed at harmonisation 1, ever since the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruling against Greece and Belgium in the case of M.S.S in January , it has become obvious that these presumptions did not reflect the European reality. The Dublin Regulation provides a set of hierarchical criteria determining the responsibility of a Member State to examine an asylum application. These criteria are based on the Principle of Responsibility the Member State which played the greatest part in the applicant's entry into or residence in the territories of the MS 78
2 shall be responsible, subject to exceptions designed to protect, inter alia, family unity. 3 In practice, the provision of Art 10(1) of the Regulation, namely irregular crossing the border into a Member State having come from a third country," plays the most important role, and as is commonly cited the Turkish border to Greece is a principle point of entry into the European Union for third-country nationals who file an asylum application in subsequence. This has arguably led to the responsibility of Greece in a disproportionate number of asylum cases. 4 It has been suggested, however, that the Greek authorities do not effectively provide a system for asylum seekers to file applications for international protection and at least since the abovementioned ruling of the ECtHR in M.S.S, they can, de-facto, not be transferred back to the Hellenic Republic, once arrived in another Member State. As a result of the high number of asylum applicants who enter the territory of the MS over the Turkish border to Greece and the impossibility for authorities of other MS to transfer asylum seekers to the Hellenic Republic, legal challenges surrounding the interpretation of provisions of the Dublin Regulations have arisen. Although only the Austrian experience is considered in this paper, this does not, however, detract from the fact that the underlying legal questions are relevant for practitioners in all MS. Austrian Context and the Asylum Court s Case Law Currently, the typical route for asylum seekers to enter the Austrian territory is via one of the so-called Western Balkan Routes, namely via Greece, Macedonia, Serbia and Hungary. 5 As a consequence, Austrian asylum authorities are currently given the task of assessing the following factual circumstances: an asylum seeker enters the territory of the MS at first instance in the Hellenic Republic, files no asylum application there, and subsequently travels via Macedonia, Serbia and Hungary to Austria, where he/she files an application for international protection. 6 Prior to the evident collapse of the Greek asylum system, the Austrian Asylum Court was inconsistent in its legal assessment. In some cases, consultations were carried out with Greek authorities, in others, Hungary was asked to take charge or take back the asylum seeker. However, ever since the ruling of the ECtHR, a uniform case law of the Asylum Court can be observed; the responsibility of Hungary under the Dublin Regulation is regularly determined. Following appeals against decisions of the Austrian Federal Asylum Office, serving as the first instance in asylum procedures, in which the practice of determining Hungary s responsibility was questioned, the Asylum Court provided a rationale for its rulings with the following arguments 7 : In cases, in which the asylum seeker has not filed an application for international protection before leaving the territory of the MS, the chain of connection has ripped ( die Anknüpfungskette ist gerissen ) and thus Greece immediately loses its responsibility under the Regulation. Thus, Hungary s responsibility according to Art 10(1) of the Regulation must be assumed. 79
3 The abovementioned reasoning is applicable, even if the asylum seeker has not left the territory of the MS for at least three months after staying in Greece, as Art 16(3) can only be applied to cases where the asylum seeker shall be taken back (meaning all cases in which the responsibility of a Member State was already determined because of the application for asylum in that Member State). The provision of Art 10(1), which states that responsibility shall cease 12 months after the date on which the irregular border crossing took place," can also not be applied, as this would lead to a conflict of values ( Wertungswiderspruch ): an application for asylum constitutes a stronger connecting factor than the mere irregular border crossing. It cannot be assumed that the period after which the responsibility of a Member State, in cases where an application for asylum was filed, ends, is shorter than in cases without an application. Hungary s responsibility may be assumed, independent of the applicability of Art 10(1) or Art 16(3) of the Regulation or the actual responsibility of Greece, as the CJEU has stated in its ruling of 21 December 2011, C-411/10 and C-493/10, that if a transfer to Greece is not possible because of systematic deficiencies in its asylum system, the catalogue of criteria can be applied anew to the effect that Hungary is responsible under the Regulation according to Art 10(1) of the Regulation. Legal Assessment of the Asylum Court s Rationale In the following paragraphs, an explanation of the relevant Articles of the Dublin Regulation will be provided. In this way, the Asylum Court s reasoning, as divided into four main arguments above, will be critically analysed. 8 The current situation of asylum seekers and Dublin returnees to Hungary and the asylum system there in light of Art 3 ECHR are explicitly not discussed in this Article. I. As cited above, the Asylum Court states that the chain of connection has ripped and thus Greece has immediately lost its responsibility under the Regulation, if no application for asylum was previously filed there. It is indeed correct that the Dublin Regulation provides for the possibility that the responsibility of a specific Member State can cease under certain circumstances. But the Regulation does not make mention of a chain of connection or a rip of such a chain. For the case of a third-country national leaving the territory of the MS, Art 16(3) stipulates a period of three months, after which the obligations specified in paragraph 1 (to take charge or take back) shall cease." This time limit was, however, not exceeded in the cases discussed here. II. As a second step, the Asylum Court states that Art 16(3) can only be applied to cases in which the responsibility of a Member State was already determined because of the application for asylum in that Member State (obligation to take back an asylum seeker). Art 16, the first provision of Chapter V of the Dublin Regulation, named Taking Charge and Taking Back, provides a clear distinction between cases of taking charge and taking back in its first paragraph. Accordingly, Art 16(1) lit a describes the obligations of a Member State to take charge, under the conditions laid down in 80
4 Articles 17 to 19, of an asylum seeker who has lodged an application in a different Member State while lit c, d and e, outline the duties of a Member State to take charge of an asylum seeker. Art 16(3), however, refers to the obligations specified in paragraph 1 as a whole, without undertaking a distinction whatsoever. In this regard, it is also necessary to emphasise that the main consequence of an application for asylum according to Art 4(1) Dublin Regulation is the initiation of a procedure to determine the responsible Member State in order to provide for the factual implementation of the conditions as foreseen by the hierarchy of criteria and in respect of the administrative regulations provided in Art and the Dublin implementing Regulation, rather than the triggering of the application of the Dublin Regulation as a whole. The responsibility of a Member State and the obligations according to Art 16(1) which come along with this responsibility are to be assumed already at the moment a criterion (for example, the irregular border crossing according to Art 10(1)) is objectively fulfilled. III. As already mentioned, Art 10(1) of the Regulation postulates a period of 12 months starting with the day of the irregular border crossing, after which the responsibility of a Member State ceases. This provision does not differentiate whether the third-country national has left the territory of the MS or not. Consequently, it has to be assumed that, in the cases relevant for this Article, Art 16(3) has to be applied as lex specialis. As the Asylum Court, however, starts with the premise of Art 16(3) not being applicable, the interpretation of Art 10(1) will be discussed here. The argument that an application for asylum constitutes a stronger connecting factor than the mere irregular border crossing and thus the period provided in Art 10(1) cannot be applied is based on the assumption that the Dublin Regulation entails a hierarchy of connecting factors." When reading the Regulation, one can see that this is clearly not the case. It is rather a hierarchy of criteria that is provided. Following this hierarchy, the application for asylum is conceived as a catch-all element," if no other criteria are met in a specific case. Thus, if one uses the argument of a hierarchy, the element of irregular border crossing must be understood as the superior criterion according to the Regulation. IV. Finally, it is necessary to examine the last argument of the Asylum Court s reasoning, namely the reference to the recent ruling of the CJEU. Basically, the Asylum Court is suggesting that, based on the ruling of the CJEU, the responsibility of Hungary under the Regulation is given, independent of the interpretation of Art 10(1) and 16(3) of the Regulation or the actual responsibility of Greece. The CJEU has stated that the finding that it is impossible to transfer an applicant to Greece, where that State is identified as the Member State responsible in accordance with the criteria set out in Chapter III of that Regulation, the Member State which should carry out that transfer must continue to examine the criteria set out in that chapter in order to establish whether one of the following criteria enables another Member State to be identified as responsible for the examination of the asylum application." In view of the exact wording of this judgment, it becomes obvious that this particular ruling is not applicable to the above-mentioned cases, as a repeated crossing of a 81
5 border in the meaning of Art 10(1) of the Regulation cannot be defined as one of the following criteria according to the CJEU s ruling. The exact same criterion, on whose basis the first Member State (Greece) is declared responsible, cannot be applied again regarding a second Member State (Hungary). 9 Further Considerations It must be argued that the Asylum Court s reasoning is in contradiction with the abovementioned intention underlying the Dublin Regulation, whereby in an area in which the free movement of persons is guaranteed in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, each Member State is responsible vis-à-vis other MS for its actions in relation to the entry and residence of third-country nationals and must bear the consequences of its actions in the spirit of solidarity and cooperation in good faith." The Asylum Court s interpretation of Art 10(1) and Art 16(3) of the Regulation results in a situation where the inability of Greece to control its borders has no consequences. At the time of the adoption of the Dublin Convention in 1990, no continuous land link between Greece and the other MS existed. It can be ruled out that the EU legislators intended to relieve the Hellenic Republic, one of the signatory countries of the Convention, of any responsibility. Outlook The analysis presented in this Article primarily suggests that the Asylum Court s case law is in contradiction with the text of the Dublin Regulation and its underlying intentions. However, it must be admitted that the Dublin Regulation does not provide a very obvious solution to the case configuration discussed in this Article. In accordance with Art 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the right to interpretation of Union Law is, however, reserved to the CJEU. As a consequence, the Asylum Court, as the last orderly instance in asylum proceedings, has an obligation to make reference unless it has established that the question raised is irrelevant or that the Union provision in question has already been interpreted by the Court or that the correct application of Union law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt." If the Asylum Court fails to comply with this obligation, the right of asylum seekers to a trial before a legal judge according to Art 83(2) of the Austrian Federal Constitutional Act is violated. 10 It is worth mentioning that the legal question presented in this Article has also led to uncertainty in the judiciary of other MS. In Swiss case law, for example, Art 10(1) and 16(3) are interpreted inconsistently. 11 In a recent proposal from the Council of the European Union on a recast of the Dublin Regulation, an attempt is made to provide clarification: it shall be explicitly mentioned in Art 16(3) of the Regulation (Art 19 in the recast version) that this provision is applicable to MS requested both to take charge and take back. 12 Note 1 Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (OJ 2003 L 31, p. 18); 82
6 Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12, and corrigendum, OJ 2005 L 204, p. 24); Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status (OJ 2005 L 326, p. 13, and corrigendum, OJ 2006 L 236, p. 36). 2 In this ruling, the ECtHR concluded that Belgian authorities should not have expelled an asylum seeker to Greece, inter alia because of the deficiencies in the asylum procedure and the conditions of reception of asylum seekers in Greece. 3 Report on the evaluation of the Dublin system, MEMO/07/227, 6 May Frontex, Annual Risk Analysis 2012, available at pdf (accessed on 18 May 2012) 5 For more information on these routes please see Frontex, Western Balkans Annual Risk Analysis 2012, available at (accessed on 18 May 2012). 6 Typically, after leaving Greece, asylum seekers must travel for a few days until they arrive in Hungary. 7 See for example Asylum Court, S /2012, 31 January The Asylum Court s reasoning, which is cited and repeated in various other decisions of the Asylum Court, was translated and paraphrased by the author of this Article. This reasoning is essentially based on an opinion presented in relevant literature (Filzwieser/Sprung, Dublin II-VO). 8 For a detailed analysis of the Austrian judiciary, please consult Reyhani/Steinwendtner/Valenta, Aktuelle Herausforderungen bei Auslegung der Dublin II-VO, Migralex 2/ Malz, Überstellung und Selbsteintrittsrecht, Öffentliche Sicherheit 3-4/12, available at (accessed on 18 May 2012).. 10 Austrian Constitutional Court, Vfslg /1995, /1996, /2003, / See for example Swiss Federal Administrative Court, D-7490/2010, 1 February 2011 and E-7121/2010, 11 October Council of the European Union, 7683/12, 16 March 2012, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (Recast). 83
Ad-Hoc Query on Sovereignty Clause in Dublin procedure. Requested by FI EMN NCP on 11 th February Compilation produced on 14 th November 2014
Ad-Hoc Query on Sovereignty Clause in Dublin procedure Requested by FI EMN NCP on 11 th February 2014 Compilation produced on 14 th November 2014 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 180/31
29.6.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 180/31 REGULATION (EU) No 604/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining
More information(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm, Migrationsöverdomstolen (Sweden))
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL TRSTENJAK delivered on 12 January 2012 (1) Case C-620/10 Migrationsverket v Nurije Kastrati, Valdrina Kastrati, Valdrin Kastrati (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,
L 239/146 COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1523 of 14 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN
More information11161/15 WST/NC/kp DGD 1
Council of the European Union Brussels, 3 September 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2015/0125 (NLE) 11161/15 ASIM 67 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: COUNCIL DECISION establishing provisional
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,
L 248/80 COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
More informationOPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON delivered on 20 June 2017(1) Case C 670/16. Tsegezab Mengesteab v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
1 of 39 21/06/2017, 12:19 Provisional text OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON delivered on 20 June 2017(1) Case C 670/16 Tsegezab Mengesteab v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Request for a preliminary ruling
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.9.2015 COM(2015) 451 final 2015/0209 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy,
More informationMigrants Who Enter/Stay Irregularly in Albania
Migrants Who Enter/Stay Irregularly in Albania Miranda Boshnjaku, PhD (c) PHD candidate at the Faculty of Law, Tirana University. Currently employed in the Directorate of State Police, Albania Email: mirandaboshnjaku@yahoo.com
More informationShifting Standards: The Dublin Regulation and Italy
139 Shifting Standards: The Dublin Regulation and Italy ANDREW T. RUBIN * Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. 1 I.! INTRODUCTION On April 2, 2013, the European
More informationEUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 5 April 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0098 (COD) LEX 1180 PE-CONS 68/1/10 REV 1 FRONT 169 CIREFI 11 COMIX 844 CODEC 1579
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Strasbourg, 5 April 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0098 (COD) LEX 1180 PE-CONS 68/1/10 REV 1 FRONT 169 CIREFI 11 COMIX 844 CODEC 1579 REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT
More informationUNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations. On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees
UNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees 1 1. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) welcomes the opportunity
More informationThe Dublin system in the first half of 2018 Key figures from selected European countries
The Dublin system in the first half of 2018 Key figures from selected European countries October 2018 This statistical update provides key figures on the application of the Dublin Regulation. 1 Up-to-date
More informationCOUNTRY FACTSHEET: CROATIA 2013
COUNTRY FACTSHEET: CROATIA 213 EUROPEAN MIGRATION NETWORK 1. Introduction This EMN Country Factsheet provides a factual overview of the main policy developments in migration and international protection
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.5.2016 COM(2016) 275 final 2016/140 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION setting out a recommendation for temporary internal border control in exceptional
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26.07.2001 COM(2001) 447 final 2001/0182(CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State
More informationTHE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS; AN INDISPENSABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE FIELD OF ASYLUM
THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS; AN INDISPENSABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE FIELD OF ASYLUM January 2017 INTRODUCTION The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU was first drawn up in 1999-2000 with the original
More informationAmended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. laying down standards for the reception of asylum seekers.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.6.2011 COM(2011) 320 final 2008/0244 (COD) Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down standards for the reception of asylum
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, C(2017) 1561 final
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 09.03.2017 C(2017) 1561 final Mr Liviu Dragnea President of the Camera Deputaților Palace of the Parliament Str. Izvor nr. 2-4, sector 5 RO 050563 BUCHAREST Dear President,
More informationSecretariat. The European Parliament The members of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Standing committee Secretariat of experts on international immigration, telephone 31 (30) 297 42 14/43 28 refugee and criminal law telefax 31 (30) 296 00 50 P.O. Box 201, 3500 AE Utrecht/The Netherlands
More informationUNHCR Statement on the reception conditions of asylum-seekers under the Dublin procedure
UNHCR Statement on the reception conditions of asylum-seekers under the Dublin procedure Issued in the context of a reference for a preliminary ruling addressed to Court of Justice of the European Union
More informationACT ON AMENDMENDS TO THE ASYLUM ACT. Title I GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1
ACT ON AMENDMENDS TO THE ASYLUM ACT Title I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 This Act stipulates the principles, conditions and the procedure for granting asylum, subsidiary protection, temporary protection,
More informationContents. Introduction Overview of Main Amendments Analysis of Key Articles Conclusion... 55
Information Note on Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) December 2014
More informationEuropean Immigration and Asylum Law
European Immigration and Asylum Law Prof. Dirk Vanheule Faculty of Law University of Antwerp dirk.vanheule@uantwerpen.be Erasmus Teaching Staff Mobility immigration - Oxford Dictionary: the process of
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.2.2016 C(2016) 871 final COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 10.2.2016 addressed to the Hellenic Republic on the urgent measures to be taken by Greece in view of the resumption
More informationMSS v. Belgium & Greece (application No /09)
Open Society Justice Initiative R U L E 9 S U B MI S S I O N TO THE CO M M I T TE E OF M I N I S T E R S MSS v. Belgium & Greece (application No. 30696/09) June 2017 Introduction and Recommendations This
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 17.6.2008 COM(2008) 360 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationImplementing the CEAS in full Translating legislation into action
Implementing the CEAS in full Translating legislation into action Building a Common European Asylum System (CEAS), is a constituent part of the European Union s (EU) objective of establishing an area of
More informationUNHCR s Recommendations to Hungary for its EU Presidency
UNHCR s Recommendations to Hungary for its EU Presidency January June 2011 1956 Volunteers drag Hungarian refugees to safety across the Austrian border Photo:UNHCR 1. Commemorating 60 years of the 1951
More informationA P R E F E R E N C E B A S E D A L L O C A T I O N S Y S T E M F O R A S Y L U M S E E K E R S W I T H I N T H E E U
THE GREEN ALTERNATIVE TO THE DUBLIN SYSTEM A P R E F E R E N C E B A S E D A L L O C A T I O N S Y S T E M F O R A S Y L U M S E E K E R S W I T H I N T H E E U By Ska Keller, Jean Lambert, Judith Sargentini,
More informationInfoCuria - Giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia. Pagina iniziale > Formulario di ricerca > Elenco dei risultati > Documenti
InfoCuria - Giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia Pagina iniziale > Formulario di ricerca > Elenco dei risultati > Documenti Avvia la stampa Lingua del documento : ECLI:EU:C:2017:586 Provisional text
More informationMigration Law JUFN20. The Dublin System. Lund University / Faculty of Law / Doctoral Student Eleni Karageorgiou 2015/01/30
Migration Law JUFN20 The Dublin System The evolution of the Dublin System The Dublin system is a collection of European regulations on the determination of the state responsible to examine an asylum application.
More informationAll European countries are not the same!
rapport nr 12/15 All European countries are not the same! The Dublin Regulation and onward migration in Europe Marianne Takle & Marie Louise Seeberg All European countries are not the same! The Dublin
More informationon the European Commission Proposal for a Qualification Regulation COM (2016) 466
UNHCR COMMENTS on the European Commission Proposal for a Qualification Regulation COM (2016) 466 (Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards for the qualification of third-country
More informationScottish Universities Legal Network on Europe
Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe Asylum Law Written by Sarah Craig, University of Glasgow Contact Sarah.craig@glasgow.ac.uk With comments from Nina Miller Westoby, University of Glasgow Maria
More informationThe European Policy Framework for Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Undocumented Migrants
The European Policy Framework for Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Undocumented Migrants A) Defining the target groups - Migrant Immigration or migration refers to the movement of people from one nation-state
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,
L 340/60 15.12.2016 RECOMMDATIONS COMMISSION RECOMMDATION (EU) 2016/2256 of 8 December 2016 addressed to the Member States on the resumption of transfers to Greece under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of
More informationList of topics for papers
General information List of topics for papers The paper has to consist of 5 000-6 000 words (including footnotes). Please consider the formatting requirements. The deadline for submission will generally
More informationHaving regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),
L 150/168 Official Journal of the European Union 20.5.2014 REGULATION (EU) No 516/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.3.2016 COM(2016) 171 final 2016/0089 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Council Decision (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures
More informationAsylum Statistics in the European Union: A Need for Numbers
Asylum Statistics in the European Union: A Need for Numbers AIDA Legal Briefing No. 2 August 2015 The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) is a project of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE),
More informationCONSIDERATIONS ON THE "SAFE THIRD COUNTRY" CONCEPT
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT POUR LES REFUGIES UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES CONSIDERATIONS ON THE "SAFE THIRD COUNTRY" CONCEPT EU Seminar on the Associated States as Safe Third Countries
More informationIntroduction and Background
Eurodac Supervision Coordination Group REPORT ON THE COORDINATED INSPECTION ON UNREADABLE FINGERPRINTS May 2013 Introduction and Background The collection and further processing of fingerprints occupy
More informationField: BVerwGE: No. Professional press: Yes
Field: BVerwGE: No Asylum law Professional press: Yes Sources in law: Asylum Procedure Act Section 27a European Charter of Human Rights Article 3 Basic Law Article 103 (1) Charter of Fundamental Rights
More informationDiscussion Paper. Mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions and the transfer of international protection status within the EU
Discussion Paper Mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions and the transfer of international protection status within the EU November 2014 Contents Abstract... 3 1. Introduction... 3 2. Origins and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM UKSC 2012/
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM UKSC 2012/2072-2075 ON APPEAL FROM HER MAJESTY S COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) (ENGLAND) B E T W E E N : - THE QUEEN on the application of EM (ERITREA) and
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular its Article 286,
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State
More informationConference of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the EU
Conference of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the EU Challenges to the Development of the Common European Asylum System On the 60 th Anniversary of the Adoption of the Convention relating to the
More informationEstimated number of undocumented migrants:
COUNTRY UPDATE FOR 2010: Hellenic Red Cross 1. Figures and facts about immigration Please add the percentage of males/females where possible National population: 11.000.000 Percentage of population that
More informationMigration Law JUFN20. The Dublin System. Lund University / Faculty of Law / PhD Candidate Eleni Karageorgiou 2016/02/01
Migration Law JUFN20 The Dublin System Issues at stake A flees Eritrea and enters Italy. She stays there for one week but doesn t claim asylum. She then travels to Germany where she lodges an asylum application.
More informationAd-Hoc Query on detention in Dublin III cases (Regulation EU No 604/2013) Requested by DE EMN NCP on 11 th July 2014
Ad-Hoc Query on detention in Dublin III cases (Regulation EU No 604/2013) Requested by DE EMN NCP on 11 th July 2014 Compilation produced on 08 th September 2014 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)
25.2.2003 L 50/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for
More informationThis is a draft document. Please do not reproduce any part of this document without the permission of the author REDIAL PROJECT
REDIAL PROJECT National Synthesis Report Germany (Draft) Second Package of the Return Directive Articles 12-14 by Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Kay Hailbronner in collaboration with Prof. Dr. Daniel Thym University
More informationDG MIGRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (DG HOME)
DG MIGRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (DG HOME) Last update: 01.09.2016 Initiative Develop a comprehensive and sustainable European migration and asylum policy framework, as set out in Articles 78 and 79 TFEU,
More informationFrom principles to action: UNHCR s Recommendations to Spain for its European Union Presidency January - June 2010
From principles to action: UNHCR s Recommendations to Spain for its European Union Presidency January - June 2010 1. Introduction Spain is the first country to take up the rotating Presidency after the
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.7.2016 COM(2016) 467 final 2016/0224 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a common procedure for international protection
More informationAt its meetings on 2 December 2016 and 17 January 2017, the Asylum Working Party examined the proposal for a Union Resettlement Framework.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 February 2017 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0225 (COD) 5332/17 LIMITE ASIM 4 RELEX 29 CODEC 46 NOTE From: Presidency To: Delegations No. prev. doc.:
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 30 May 2013 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 30 May 2013 (*) (Area of freedom, security and justice Directive 2008/115/EC Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals
More informationCenter for Security Studies
Center for Security Studies Border Security, Camps, Quotas: The Future of European Refugee Policy? 14 Jun 2016 By Steffen Angenendt, David Kipp and Anne Koch for Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)
More informationEffective Remedies under EU Law & ECtHR. EDAL Conference 2014 Dublin, 17 th, 18 th January 2014
Effective Remedies under EU Law & ECtHR EDAL Conference 2014 Dublin, 17 th, 18 th January 2014 cathryn.costello@law.ox.ac.uk Two Supranational Courts Sources: C Costello The Asylum Procedures Directive
More informationANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Decision
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.3.2016 C(2016) 1568 final ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the Commission Implementing Decision amending Implementing Decision C(2015)9534 concerning the adoption of the work programme
More informationMINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR. ACT ON INTERNATIONAL AND TEMPORARY PROTECTION clean version
MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR ACT ON INTERNATIONAL AND TEMPORARY PROTECTION clean version Official Gazette NN 70/15, 127/17 Enacted as of 01.01.2018. ACT ON INTERNATIONAL AND TEMPORARY PROTECTION I. THE CONSTITUTIONAL
More informationGood practices in the return and reintegration of irregular migrants:
European Migration Network Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2014 Good practices in the return and reintegration of irregular migrants: Member States entry bans policy and use of readmission
More informationPosition Paper on Violence against Women and Girls in the European Union And Persons of Concern to UNHCR
Position Paper on Violence against Women and Girls in the European Union And Persons of Concern to UNHCR This paper focuses on gender-based violence against women and girls of concern to the Office of
More informationUnder this proposal the Greek Council for Refugees, inter alia, notes that:
In December 2015, the Greek Council for Refugees released a policy brief on the Implementation of Alternatives to Administrative Detention in Greece. This policy brief aims at promoting the use of alternatives
More informationKryzysy migracyjny i uchodźczy w Europie 2014+:
Kryzysy migracyjny i uchodźczy w Europie 2014+: język ma znaczenie Marta Pachocka Migration and asylum landscape in Europe/ the EU the general picture of the so-called crisis of 2014+ Migration to Europe
More informationStatewatch Analysis. The revised Dublin rules on responsibility for asylum-seekers: The Council s failure to fix a broken system
Introduction Statewatch Analysis The revised Dublin rules on responsibility for asylum-seekers: The Council s failure to fix a broken system Steve Peers Professor of Law, Law School, University of Essex
More information***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0225(COD)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2016/0225(COD) 23.3.2017 ***I DRAFT REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationCroatia and EU Asylum Law: Playing on the Sidelines or at the Centre of Events? * Iris Goldner Lang * 1. Introduction
Croatia and EU Asylum Law: Playing on the Sidelines or at the Centre of Events? * Iris Goldner Lang * 1. Introduction This chapter discusses the most important recent developments in asylum law and practice
More informationGuidance Note on the transposition and implementation of the EU Asylum Acquis. February 2014
Guidance Note on the transposition and implementation of the EU Asylum Acquis February 2014 1. Timeframes for the transposition of the recast EU asylum legislation Directives: EU Directives lay down certain
More informationAD1/3/2007/Ext/CN. Systems in Europe, September Section 3 pp
The Dublin Regulation: Ten Recommendations for Reform EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES CONSEIL EUROPEEN SUR LES REFUGIES ET LES EXILES AD1/3/2007/Ext/CN The European Council on Refugees and Exiles
More informationThe Concept of Safe Third Countries Legislation and National Practices
The Concept of Safe Third Countries Legislation and National Practices Mysen Consulting 2017 Content List of abbreviations... V 1. Introduction... 1 2. Legal framework - the concept of a safe third country...
More informationThe Supreme Court of Norway
The Supreme Court of Norway On 18 May 2016, the Supreme Court of Norway delivered judgment in HR-2016-01051-A, (case no. 2015/1857), civil case, appeal against judgment. A (Counsel Terje Einarsen qualifying
More informationIRISH REFUGEE COUNCIL COMMENTS ON THE GENERAL SCHEME OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION BILL
IRISH REFUGEE COUNCIL COMMENTS ON THE GENERAL SCHEME OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION BILL May 2015 1 1. Introduction The Irish Refugee Council (hereinafter IRC) is Ireland s only national non-governmental
More informationReforming the Common European Asylum System in a spirit of humanity and solidarity
Reforming the Asylum System in a spirit of humanity and solidarity REF. RCEU 07/2016 002 04.07.2016 migration Recommendations from the National Red Cross Societies in the European Union and the International
More informationOn the Future of the Common EU Refugee and Asylum Policy
On the Future of the Common EU Refugee and Asylum Policy Response of the Expert Council of German Foundations on Integration and Migration (SVR) to the public consultation Debate on the future of Home
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Defendant SUBMISSIONS BY UNHCR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT CO/8660/2009 R (NAJIBULLAH SAEEDI) Claimant V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Defendant SUBMISSIONS BY UNHCR A Introduction 1. The Office of
More information12926/16 al 1 GIP 1B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 October 2016 (OR. en) 12926/16 OJ CONS 48 JAI 804 COMIX 648 PROVISIONAL AGDA Subject: 3490th meeting of the COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (Justice and Home Affairs)
More informationUNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES Regional Office for the Benelux and the European Institutions
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT POUR LES REFUGIES Délégation Régionale pour le Benelux et les Institutions Européennes Rue Van Eyck 11B B 1050 Bruxelles Téléfax : 627.17.30 Téléphone : 649.01.53 Email
More informationUK Race & Europe NETWORK July 2010 Briefing Paper The EU Stockholm Programme: What implications for immigration, asylum and integration in the UK? INTRODUCTION This briefing paper provides the background
More informationStatewatch Analysis. The revised directive on Refugee and Subsidiary Protection status
Statewatch Analysis The revised directive on Refugee and Subsidiary Protection status Steve Peers Professor of Law, Law School, University of Essex Introduction The Council and European Parliament have
More informationTECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE DATA COLLECTION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate F: Social statistics Unit F-2: Population Luxembourg, February 2018 TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE DATA COLLECTION UNDER ART. 4.1-4.3 OF REGULATION 862/2007 STATISTICS
More informationTEXTS ADOPTED. The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration
European Parliament 2014-2019 TEXTS ADOPTED P8_TA(2016)0102 The situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration European Parliament resolution of 12 April 2016 on the
More informationPROPOSALS FOR A RECAST DUBLIN REGULATION: PROMOTING THE LEGAL TRANSFERS OF UNACCOMPANIED MINORS OR INCREASING THE NUMBER OF MISSING CHILDREN?
PROPOSALS FOR A RECAST DUBLIN REGULATION: PROMOTING THE LEGAL TRANSFERS OF UNACCOMPANIED MINORS OR INCREASING THE NUMBER OF MISSING CHILDREN? Thousands of unaccompanied minors go missing from state care
More informationUK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014
UK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment 1955 Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014 Reply requested by 14 th August 2014 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Estonia,
More informationTable of contents United Nations... 17
Table of contents United Nations... 17 Human rights International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 21 December 1965 (excerpt)... 19 General Recommendation XXII on
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.9.2016 COM(2016) 635 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the application of Council Implementing Decision of 12 May 2016 setting
More informationEASO Single Programming Document
European Asylum Support Office EASO Single Programming Document Multiannual Programming 2018-2020 Work Programme 2018 Amendment 2 November 2018 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION EASO SINGLE PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT 2018-2020
More informationMoving forward on asylum and international protection in the EU s interests
Moving forward on asylum and international protection in the EU s interests UNHCR s recommendations to Greece for the EU Presidency January - June 2014 A mother and her children at a detention centre in
More informationINFORM. Safe Countries of Origin. 1 Introduction
INFORM Safe Countries of Origin 1 Introduction In the wake of the high influx of mainly Syrian asylum seekers in 2015, several (Member) States were confronted with a considerable number of asylum applications
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 5.5.2004 SEC(2004) 557 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER First annual report to the Council and the European Parliament on the activities of the EURODAC Central
More informationThe United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Observations on the proposed amendments to the Lithuanian Law on Legal Status of Aliens
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Observations on the proposed amendments to the Lithuanian Law on Legal Status of Aliens (No XIP-4566) I. Introduction 1. UNHCR welcomes the opportunity
More informationThe Dublin III System: More Derogations to the Duty to Transfer Individual Asylum Seekers? * and Elise Muir **
Insight The Dublin III System: More Derogations to the Duty to Transfer Individual Asylum Seekers? Šeila Imamovic * and Elise Muir ** ABSTRACT: In the C.K. et al. v. Republika Slovenija ruling (judgment
More informationUNHCR POSITION ON THE RETURN OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS TO GREECE UNDER THE DUBLIN REGULATION
UNHCR POSITION ON THE RETURN OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS TO GREECE UNDER THE DUBLIN REGULATION This present Return Advisory complements and revises The Return to Greece of Asylum-Seekers With "Interrupted" Claims
More informationOxford Monitor of Forced Migration Vol. 4, No. 2
Implications of the New Turkish Law on Foreigners and International Protection and Regulation no. 29153 on Temporary Protection for Syrians Seeking Protection in Turkey By Meltem Ineli-Ciger More than
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. on the Assessment of the implementation of the Greek Action Plan on Asylum and Migration management
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.10.2014 SWD(2014) 316 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the Assessment of the implementation of the Greek Action Plan on Asylum and Migration management EN EN Contents
More informationCoordinated Supervision of Eurodac. Activity Report
Coordinated Supervision of Eurodac Activity Report 2010-2011 Brussels, 24 May 2012 Secretariat of the Eurodac Supervision Coordination Group EDPS Rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels email: eurodac@edps.europa.eu
More informationEU-Turkey Agreement. 18. March 2016 in effect since 20. March 2016
EU-Turkey Agreement 18. March 2016 in effect since 20. March 2016 Facts: EU and Turkey agreed that... new irregular migrants crossing from Turkey to the Greek islands as of 20 March 2016 will be returned
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2009R0810 EN 20.03.2012 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EC) No 810/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More information36 Congress of the FIDH. Lisbon, 19 April Migration Forum. "EU Migration policy"
36 Congress of the FIDH Lisbon, 19 April 2007 Migration Forum "EU Migration policy" Presentation by Sandra Pratt DG Justice, Freedom and Security European Commission 1/7 Migration issues are high on the
More information