Evidence before Administrative Tribunals

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Evidence before Administrative Tribunals"

Transcription

1 Evidence before Administrative Tribunals The IRB Experience. Gordon Maynard Maynard Kischer Stojicevic 1. Introduction The three tribunals of the Immigration and Refugee Board are the Refugee Protection Division (RPD), Immigration Division (ID) and Immigration Appeal Division (IAD). They are collectively the largest tribunal in Canada and their decisions can be highly controversial. 1 For example; whether Mr. Lai, a PRC businessman, should be given protected status to prevent his return to the PRC where he may face torture or the death penalty for allegations of business corruption and tax evasion that he claims are politically motivated (RPD); whether Mr. Lai should be detained in custody pending determination of his protected status or pending removal from Canada (ID), or whether two immigrant street racers, Mr. Khosa and Mr. Balru, should lose their permanent resident status and be deported to India as a result of their criminal convictions (IAD). The decisions of these tribunals can be judicially reviewed by the Federal Court, but only with leave of the Court. Leave applications make up the largest component of the Federal Court docket, numbering in the thousands of applications annually. The reality is that leave is granted in only about 15% of the cases, so that decisions of the IRB are substantially final. This paper looks at the current processes for putting evidence before the decision-makers in each of these tribunals. The processes are not complicated. Although these are specialized tribunals with a self-imposed assertion of informal conduct, they in fact are historically structured along the lines of criminal or civil courts. There is an independent decision maker, two parties each in essentially adversarial position (the Government on one side and the person concerned on the other), representation by counsel (that need not be a lawyer), rules for prior disclosure of evidence, conduct of a hearing where the side bearing the onus of proof proceeds first, and a decision based on the record of evidence put before the decision-maker through oral testimony (with cross examination) and documentation. There are variations in process that have evolved over the past decade, particularly in the RPD dealing with refugee and protection determinations, and this leads to the second theme of this paper. The full scale use of tribunals for immigration enforcement process is expensive and too slow for political comfort. The IRB has, in the past two decades, become a lightning rod for all manner of criticisms arising from whatever embarrassment or failure of immigration policy is captured by the press or party seeking to exploit for political purposes. 1 The ID has 28 members (decision-makers). The ID held 2,320 admissibility hearings in 2005, and 10,943 detention reviews. The IAD has 31 members and heard 5,513 appeals in The RPD has 120 members and finalized 27,280 claims in 2005.

2 When boatloads of PRC citizens landed off the west coast of Vancouver Island and claimed refugee status, it was the RPD that had to process their claims for status amidst a storm of criticisms that it was Canada s lax and generous process that not only attracted the refugees, but which also prolonged the claimants time in Canada. When a Toronto housewife was shot to death in a bungled robbery by a Jamaican under a removal order but none the less still in Canada, it was the IRB that was wrongly made the whipping boy and then targeted for revisions of process that significantly changed the process for determining removal of permanent residents from Canada. The latter portion of this paper presents current and future changes to the IRB tribunal processes that are forced from pressures for simpler and faster justice. Expediency is being pursued, but at a cost of procedural fairness and the diminishment of evidence before the decision-maker. 2. The Three Divisions a Primer The jurisdiction of the IRB is established by the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and before that by the predecessor legislation, the Immigration Act. The IRB is a tribunal buffer for adjudication of immigration enforcement against foreign nationals and immigrants in Canada. The parties before the tribunal are usually the Canadian Border Services Agency as delegates of the Minister, and the person concerned. The decision makers are independent of the CBSA or of Citizenship and Immigration; they are appointed members of the IRB. The IRB is divided into three Divisions. Each Division has its particular jurisdiction, set by IRPA. Each Division carries out its determinations through hearing processes that have all the significant attributes of procedural fairness. There is an oral hearing and a decision by the independent decision maker based on the evidence put before the tribunal, including oral and documentary evidence tendered by either party and subjected to examination and cross examination. Each Division is subject to its own Rules of procedure. Each Division has sole and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine all questions of fact and law, including questions of jurisdiction, with respect to the following proceedings brought under IRPA. Immigration Division (ID) When foreign nationals or immigrants are arrested and detained for immigration violations, the ID reviews and determines their detention and any terms of release. A person under detention may have multiple reviews conducted. The ID can issue removal orders against foreign nationals and permanent residents after determining an allegation of inadmissibility brought by the CBSA.

3 The removal order causes loss of any status and allows CBSA to take up removal procedure. The alleged inadmissibility can include criminality through conviction or offence overseas or in Canada, misrepresentation, security risk or human rights violation amongst others. Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) The Appeal Division hears appeals from removal orders against permanent residents and persons with protected status (persons who have properly been determined to be refugees or persons at risk of torture). Ordinary foreign nationals (visitors, students, workers) have minimal status in Canada and no right of appeal against any removal order. The Appeal Division has jurisdiction for law and equity. The Appeal Division can determine that the removal order was unlawful, or that the order should be set aside solely on consideration of all the circumstances of the case. Such an order is much like a criminal court judge deciding guilt, but suspending sentence on terms and conditions that must be met by the accused against threat of the sentence being imposed. The Appeal Division hears appeals by permanent residents or Canadian citizens whose family members abroad (spouse, child or parent/grandparent) have been refused visas for immigration. Again, the Appeal Division has jurisdiction for law and equity. The Appeal Division can determine whether the refusal of visa was lawful, and whether the inadmissibility should be overcome on equitable grounds (humanitarian and compassionate considerations that are sufficient to warrant special relief from the inadmissibility. Refuge Protection Division (RPD) Persons in Canada who are not permanent residents or citizens can claim refugee or protected person status. Within limits, this protected status allows them to avoid removal to the country of persecution and to obtain resident status in Canada. The RPD has no involvement in removal of persons whose claims fail, or to make determinations of inadmissibility, or to give immigrant status to successful claimants. Their jurisdiction is solely to determine whether the claim meets the Geneva Convention definition of refugee, or the IRPA definition of protected person.

4 3. Evidence before the IRB Divisions. In each of the Divisions evidence can be documentary and oral. There are requirements for prior disclosure of documentary evidence and there is cross examination of oral evidence and sources of documentary evidence. The rules of evidence are relaxed in the Division proceedings, but a party can be caught with exclusion of evidence where disclosure requirements are not met. Evidence can be hearsay and informal; the IRPA specifically gives the Divisions broad latitude to accept a wide range of evidence. The Divisions... i. are not bound by any legal or technical rules of evidence, and ii. may receive and base a decision on evidence that is adduced in the proceedings and considered credible and trustworthy in the circumstances. 2 Evidence in the Immigration Division It is the Minister (CBSA) that has the burden to establish that a person in Canada is inadmissible. The burden is low; a preponderance of evidence to show that the there are reasonable grounds to believe that the inadmissibility conditions are met. The consequence is that the person concerned needs to present compelling and reliable evidence to refute the prima facie case. The evidence disclosed and presented by the Minister will almost always be documentary evidence, and only occasionally oral evidence. The documentary evidence will have been gathered by CBSA investigative officers from sources including national and overseas agencies, from civilians questioned by the investigative officers, from overseas visa officers and files. The amount of evidence required will depend on the nature of the inadmissibility. A simple allegation of in-canada criminal inadmissibility will require only that the person concerned not be a Citizen, and that conviction for a suitable offence have occurred in a Canadian court. Unless there is an egregious mistake of identity, there is virtually no defence to the allegation properly brought. On the other hand, an allegation of inadmissibility for an overseas crime can be complex. It is not necessary that there be conviction, but the absence of a conviction means that there has to be reliable evidence that the offence was indeed committed, and that the offence is equivalent to an offence in Canada. This allegation raises questions of the sufficiency of the overseas evidence, often obtained from police or investigative sources that are not available for cross-examination, and involving crimes that do not necessarily equate to a criminal offence in Canada. 2 Immigration Division Rules, Immigration Appeal Division Rules, Refugee Protection Division Rules.

5 Grounds of inadmissibility such as alleged human rights violations or security risk will involve overseas evidence from sources that may not be credible, and raise complex legal issues on the definition of membership in these inadmissibility classes. Misrepresentation inadmissibility may involve an allegation of marriage of convenience that the person concerned obtained their status through a marriage to a Canadian or immigrant and the marriage was primarily untaken for immigration rather than an intent to live together in relationship. In a society where marriages have a high rate of failure in the best of times, and given that immigrant marriages may follow the cultural tradition of family arrangement, the Minister is often challenged to uphold an allegation of marriage of convenience. Defense of an inadmissibility allegation in the ID will almost always involve sworn oral evidence and cross-examination of the person concerned. Indeed, in an ID proceeding the person concerned is a compellable witness. Sworn evidence from the person concerned is rarely sufficient on its own to maintain a defence. Evidence in the Appeal Division The Appeal Division proceeding is a hearing de novo on a finding of inadmissibility or issuance of removal order. The Appellant is free to bring any and all new evidence to retry that finding. The Appeal Division also has jurisdiction in certain cases to apply equitable consideration to relieve the Appellant from the consequences of inadmissibility or removal order. This jurisdiction allows consideration of all the circumstances of the case, and humanitarian and compassionate circumstances. The Appellant carries the burden overcoming the inadmissibility or accessing the equitable jurisdiction and the scope of evidence to be brought forward will address the following issues: The circumstances of inadmissibility. If it is criminal inadmissibility, then the circumstances of the offence and the surrounding reasons for offence, if it is residence breach, then the reasons for absence and circumstances of return, if it is failure to meet terms and conditions, then degree of breach is relevant. The seriousness of the offence or breach. The likelihood of rehabilitation in criminal cases. The establishment of the Appellant in Canada. The level of support from family, friends and community. Hardship upon family in Canada or upon the Appellant abroad if deportation is effected. The best interests of any child directly affected by the removal.

6 The weight to be given to any of these factors will vary in the circumstances of the case, and so dictate the evidence to be brought. The availability of the equitable jurisdiction means that witnesses and evidence can be brought that were not available at first instance, including witnesses and evidence from family, employers, friends and professionals, including expert evidence (for instance to cultural norms, emotional state, health and the like). Evidence before the Refugee Protection Division The specialized jurisdiction of the RPD and the particular nature of claimants uniquely characterize evidence and proceedings before the RPD and the determination of refugee or protected person status. In particular, Claimants will not usually speak English or French, and will require translation of evidence. Claimants will only have recently entered Canada and will have little understanding or trust of processes in which they are engaged. Claimants will often be vulnerable to advice from relatives, community or pseudo consultants who will undermine your good advice. Claimants will have come to Canada with minimal or no supporting evidence of their claim, and little may be available from abroad. There is an inherent systematic suspicion of claims for protection, evident in Port of Entry records of discussions with the claimant by CBSA officers, and the record of discussions with CIC officers who must first determine eligibility to make a protection claim. These records, as well as the claimant s required narrative of the claim may be used to contest credibility. In the past 20 years the process for determination of claims has evolved from an adversarial process to a directed inquiry. The process in the RPD is quite different from the other tribunals and this will be examined in the latter part of this paper, regarding changes to the processes affecting consideration of evidence. Practice Tips respecting evidence before the IRB Divisions I digress here to offer practice tips on evidence before the IRB Divisions. Not all are applicable in each Division, or for every client. These are gleaned from near twenty years experience in tribunal proceeding and they have served me well, though not necessarily making me efficient: i. Know your relevant facts. If you don t know your facts then you don t know what evidence you should or can bring to the table, or foresee a witness or document is going to turn around and bite you.

7 Don t rely simply on whatever record or disclosure underlies your proceeding, and don t trust your client s first narrative of the story. Seek out primary and secondary sources of the facts. The Access to Information Act and Privacy Act permits you to seek out overseas or inland government files concerning your client. Get them and review them with your client. Know exactly the information held by the government side and whether it is incomplete or erroneous. Seek out corroborative evidence specific to your client business records, travel records, telephone bills, credit card records, court transcripts, personal letters, bank records for example and as relevant to your case. Interview and challenge your client relentlessly. Your client will have to testify and you need to know what he can and will say. Most importantly, you have to believe it. Seek out witnesses to testify in support of your client. It relieves the burden on your client and adds support to credibility. Supporting witnesses can often have an observation or viewpoint that is missed by your client. If there are no supporting witnesses then perhaps you need to reassess the credibility of your client. Gathering the facts is an onerous and time-consuming process. Make sure you are being paid well and get on with it. ii. Focus your Case There is no point flogging a dead horse or using a shotgun where a target rifle is needed. It only confuses the case. If there is a good legal issue then ride with it, and make sure that your evidence sets the foundation necessary for the argument. If there is no good legal issue then admit it and get on with a different focus where you can help your client. Energy might be better spent on focusing evidence and argument on equitable jurisdiction relief, or upon minimizing the damage by seeking the least onerous acceptance of facts and consequences. iii. Organize your documentary evidence and make sure both you and your client know it. Whether it is dictated by the Rules or not, my documentary evidence is bound, indexed, tabbed and page numbered. It is a good idea. Nothing stops the flow of a good examination or argument than fumbling to find a document. I always make extra copies of the Document brief, one for the client and one for me at least. My copy has my annotations to remind me why a particular document is necessary

8 and cross referencing it to other related documents. A clean copy is kept for presenting to witnesses in examination. The documents should be organized intelligently, grouping together documents relevant to a particular issue. Before I finalize my document brief I go through it page by page and remind myself why a document is wanted or needed, and reminding myself why I don t have a document I wish I did. iv. Prepare the witnesses for oral evidence. In IRB proceedings credibility is always in issue, and it is going to be determined both by what your client (and their documents) say and how they say it. Persons do not generally have experience as tribunal witnesses, and natural nervousness can destroy the presentation of evidence and contribute to a finding of lack of credibility. This can be prevented by making your client familiar with their evidence and the process and even visiting the tribunal room to view the lay of the land and to observe an ongoing proceeding before their own hearing. Here is the advice I give my clients and witnesses regarding oral evidence: Listen to the question and do not answer unless the question is understood. If there is any doubt about the question ask for the question to be repeated or restated. Look at the person asking the question, but when answering look at the decisionmaker and answer to them. The decision-maker wants to see your face and eyes. Then look back for the next question. If you are not sure of an answer then say so. Do not give an answer that you are not sure of as though you are. This includes dates. People do not remember dates well, but they do remember a sequence of events. If you are not sure of a date then don t give one, rather say it was before this event or after that one. Answer the question and then shut up. Do not interpret silence as an invitation to ramble on. If the questioner wants more information then they will ask a further question. Trust me to pick up loose ends in re-examination. Do not answer a question with another question, and do not use the question to wander to another area. This appears evasive. Never lose your temper or become excited, regardless of how the questioner may bait you. Take a deep breath and keep calm, and speaking slowly. v. Interpreters It is the nature of immigration law that many witnesses do not speak good English or French, and require interpretation of evidence. In the IRB tribunals interpreters are provided.

9 Whenever possible, encourage your client to give evidence in English or French rather than relying on the interpreter. Keep the interpreter on standby if you need to. It is a fine balance between using an interpreter if you need to and your client giving evidence that can be understood as it is given. Giving evidence through an interpreter is somewhat like watching bad Hong Kong movie where the voice track is out of synch with the action. When the content is separated from the delivery there is a considerable loss of texture and emotion. It deflates the credibility of the evidence. vi. Telephone evidence. It is often necessary to obtain evidence from an out of country witness, particularly in marriage of convenience cases. This is done by use of a speaker phone in the middle of the hearing room. Oral evidence through an interpreter and over the telephone is cumbersome and prone to being unclear. Many counsel will not tender overseas evidence simply to avoid the potential confusion of testimony. 4. Developments affecting Evidence in IRB Tribunal Proceedings. From the perspective of the person concerned, appellant or claimant in IRB tribunal proceedings, there is nothing wrong with the Divisions processes for determining enforcement issues. The hearing processes are fair and the person concerned has their day in court a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The only complaint might well be that the processes are slow and backlogged. It is also a complaint from some corners of the public and from the government. They are also expensive. There are considerable pressures for the determination processes to be faster. The challenge is to retain the procedural protections that institutionalize independence and fairness while finding the means to expedite decision making. Refugee Protection Division Fifteen years ago the acceptance rate in the Refugee Division was in excess of 70%. Today it is in the order of 45%. The following practices have contributed to the ability of the Division to distinguish between deserving and undeserving claims through standardized consideration of evidence. Specialized Geographical Teams Decision-makers, Refugee Claims Officers, support staff and managers are grouped together in geographic teams. The teams are assigned specific countries for which they can develop specialised knowledge of country conditions. At the team level, members discuss inconsistencies in documentation and share assessments of legal and factual

10 issues pertaining to claims from their countries. In this manner, members work as a group of experts on specific countries to exchange ideas and information in areas where the law or general conditions in a country are unclear. Issues requiring further research are identified, as are the training or educational needs of the team. There is also a national exchange of information between teams with the same geographic areas of expertise. These geographic networks operate to keep members across the country informed of developments and to share documentation and information. Where significant discrepancies in acceptance rates arise between regions, the Board employs a more focused strategy to ensure consistency. The developed expertise of the decision-makers, RCO s and support staff challenges claimants to present credible evidence that withstands examination and which meets the elements of need for protection, including the inability of the state to provide protection and the availability of internal flight alternatives. Standardized National Documentation Packages The Research Directorate of the IRB is mandated with gathering information on the social, political, economic and human rights conditions in countries of origins of claimants. The information is gathered from national and international government and NGO organizations, human rights monitors, academics, publications and new services. The Research Directorate also gathers specific information in Response to Information Requests that may be initiated by counsel, staff or RPOs. The information is updated regularly and is consolidated in National Documentation Packages that are country specific and disclosed by the RPO in each hearing involving the particular country of origin. Counsel or claimant is free to contest the contents or to disclose further information that they may acquire. The National Documentation Packages are available over the internet, from links on the IRB site, and their use seeks to ensure an accurate, standard, consistent and updated information base against which to place the context of the individual claim. Reverse order Questioning The Chairperson of the IRB has statutory authority to issue written guidelines and to identify decisions as jurisprudential guides and persuasive decisions to assist members to carry out their duties. In October 2003 the Chairman issued Guideline 7, changing the order of questioning by having the RPD leading the inquiry in the hearing room, instead of counsel for the claimant leading the examination of the claimant. The purpose of the change of order was to allow the RPD to use its expertise to direct focus on issues and evidence that it identified as determinative of the claim.

11 The guidelines must be followed by the decision-makers or they must provide a reasoned justification for not doing so. This particular guideline was challenged in the Federal Court (Thamotharem 2006 FC 16) and was found to be a technical fettering of the discretion of the decision-makers. Notwithstanding, the guideline continues to govern the conduct of RPD adjudications albeit with the right of counsel to present argument as to why it should not apply in a given case. Immigration Appeal Division In March 2006 the Chairperson undertook the IAD Innovation initiative to re-examine how the IAD functions, and to develop strategies to address the increasing volume of cases in the Division. The Innovation is ongoing and has not yet resulted in formal recommendations for implementation. The Innovation is examining all aspects of the IAD adjudication processes, including avenues for alternative resolution streams and use of Specialized Teams with focus upon particular appeals. One of the more dramatic innovations being considered is early receipt of information (evidence) for facilitating streaming for early determination. Under the current system the Appellant files a Notice of Appeal from a decision of inadmissibility or removal order, but then the both the Appellant and tribunal await production of the underlying Record from the decision under review. Production of the Record can take several months and there is no scheduling of Appeal or appellant obligation disclose evidence until the Record is produced and the Appeal scheduled. Under the Innovation Plan it is proposed that the appellant be required to disclose evidence with the Notice of Appeal, well before the full Record is ever produced. Appellants will be asked to provide details relating to their appeal, in particular to outline the evidence and facts to be relied on to make their case. For appeals that proceed to hearing, the parties will be given a further opportunity to submit evidence that did not exist or could not reasonably have been obtained at the time of hearing. Counsel are understandably concerned with the requirement for early disclosure, before they ever see the Record and before they have had reasonable opportunity to learn their client s case, against the penalty that they may be prevented from presenting evidence later, when they know both their client and the Record. It is my experience that clients who have submitted their own overseas sponsorship applications are in no position to provide meaningful evidence for Appeal at time of filing of Notice of Appeal. Clients will not have a copy of their application package, will not understand why an application has been refused, and the officer s notes of decision are not enough to work from. It is unrealistic to expect counsel to formulate a meaningful appeal at this stage of proceeding. If the ultimate objective of the Appeal Division is to make the right decision and not

12 simply a fast decision, the door should always be open for timely disclosure of evidence for the full hearing. Administrative Decision Making Avoiding the Tribunals altogether At one time the legislation contemplated that, with few exceptions, all enforcement determinations against foreign nationals and permanent residents, and all sponsorship appeals by Canadians or PRs would be adjudicated by the independent tribunals. The tribunals in hearings would determine for instance whether the foreign national or PR had committed an enforceable breach of the Immigration legislation, and would issue the appropriate removal order causing loss of status and forced banishment from Canada. It was presumed that the rights put in issue and the consequences justified a formal process with all the trappings of procedural fairness. Incrementally, the jurisdiction of the tribunals has been whittled down. More and more, determinations of inadmissibility and issuance of removal order are being taken from the tribunal and given to officers of CBSA acting administratively. The first targets for administrative enforcement are the persons with the weakest rights and minimal entitlement to substantive procedural fairness foreign nationals. These are the visitors, workers or students in Canada who may have overstayed their status or breached the terms of their status by working or studying illegally or by committing a criminal offence. Or at least those are the breaches alleged. Under the current legislation, an officer who is of the opinion that a foreign national is inadmissible may write a report setting out the facts and forwarding it to a senior officer who is the Minister s delegate. If the Minister s delegate is of the opinion that the report is well founded, the delegate may issue the removal order against the foreign national. 3 That s it. There are exceptions for more complicated cases, but otherwise there is no process dictated in law other than that two officers decide that their opinion of inadmissibility is well founded. The legislation requires no notice to the foreign national, no opportunity to present their case, no opportunity to argue why the officers should exercise their intended discretion not to enforce against the foreign national, and no independent decision-maker. The law reduces the process to the level of a parking ticket. A parking ticket has better appeal rights. The administrative authority was challenged in the Federal Court by Mr. Cha. Mr. Cha was a foreign student in Canada for five years and was attending a post-secondary college. He was a semester away from graduating from an auto mechanics program. Mr. Cha was stopped by police and given a breathalyzer test. He failed and was convicted for impaired driving. 3 S.44(1),(2) of IRPA

13 CBSA officers learned of his conviction and he was invited down for a talk. He wasn t told why he was being called down, and he was not told that he should bring a lawyer. The interviewing officer asked him about his conviction, which he admitted, and his history of studies. The officer then wrote his report and presented it to a senior officer. The senior officer issued a removal order against Mr. Cha then and there. Mr. Cha was never advised that there was any discretion on the part of the officers, was never told of the reason why he was being called down, never told that he could consult counsel, and never invited to explain the circumstances of his offence or the circumstances of his past and present studies in Canada. This isn t to say that it would have made a difference, but the law did contemplate a discretion and the principles of administrative justice dictated that there should be some procedural fairness in the process. At the Federal Court Mr. Cha was given relief. The Court held that the minimum requirements of fairness dictated that: Mr. Cha should have an interview with the Minister s delegate (which was granted). He should have notice of right to counsel. (which was denied) He should have a reasonable opportunity to present evidence, to advance mitigating factors that might affect the officer s discretion. (which he was denied). The Court confirmed that the officer had a discretion on whether to issue the removal order, and concluded that if the officer was aware that Mr. Cha was only a couple of months from graduation, that it was his intention to then return to Korea, and that his one conviction was for a minor offence that the officer may well have exercised her discretion to not issue the removal order. The Minister took the case to the Court of Appeal 4, and the FC decision was overturned. The FCA held that, despite the words may in s.44(1) and s.44(2) of IRPA, the officers in fact had no discretion to consider mitigating factors and could only consider whether Mr. Cha had indeed been convicted so that he was inadmissible under the legislation. If he was so convicted, then there was no choice but to issue the removal order. Given the administrative nature of the decision, there was no breach of procedural fairness to Mr. Cha. In rationalizing its decision, the Court noted that they were at the very heart of typically routine administrative decisions. and that the fact that the responsibility for the decision was assigned to a delegate reflected Parliament s intention that it be a straightforward and fact-driven determination. 5 The consequences of this decision are considerable. When Parliament moves decisionmaking out of tribunals and into the realm of pure administrative determinations, there will be minimal procedural process, minimal participatory rights and a presumption that the determination is intended to be straight-forward and simple. Do not take for granted 4 Cha v Canada 2006 FCA at paragraph 44.

14 that classic administrative law principles will restore procedural content, or presumptions of discretion will be maintained. It is noteworthy that in the FCA Mr. Cha was not represented. It is also noteworthy that the s.44(1) and s.44(2) also has application to permanent residents whose rights in issue are far more substantial than foreign nationals. It has yet to be seen whether the Court will extend their interpretation to that class.

Balanced Refugee Reform Act

Balanced Refugee Reform Act Balanced Refugee Reform Act Presentation by John Butt, Manager, Program Design, Asylum Policy and Program Development Refugees Branch, Citizenship and Immigration Canada Purpose The purpose of this technical

More information

LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA INTRODUCTION Purpose and currency of checklist. This checklist is designed to be used with the CLIENT IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURE (A-1) checklist. It is intended for use by immigration counsel

More information

Refugee Hearing Preparation: A Guide for Refugee claimants

Refugee Hearing Preparation: A Guide for Refugee claimants Refugee Hearing Preparation: A Guide for Refugee claimants Are you waiting for your Refugee Hearing? This information booklet provides information and suggestions that can help you prepare well for your

More information

RETAINING YOUR PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS

RETAINING YOUR PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS RETAINING YOUR PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic 180 Dundas Street West, Ste 1701 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Telephone: 416-971-9674 Fax: 416-971-6780 After you

More information

OP 10. Permanent Residency Status Determination

OP 10. Permanent Residency Status Determination OP 10 Permanent Residency Status Determination Updates to chapter... 3 1. What this chapter is about... 5 2. Program objectives... 5 3. The Act and Regulations... 5 3.1. Forms... 6 4. Instruments and delegations...6

More information

ENF 6. Review of reports under subsection A44(1)

ENF 6. Review of reports under subsection A44(1) ENF 6 Review of reports under subsection A44(1) Table of contents Updates to chapter... 4 1. What this chapter is about... 6 2. Program objectives... 6 3. The Act and Regulations... 6 3.1. Considerations...

More information

ENF 6. Review of Reports under A44(1)

ENF 6. Review of Reports under A44(1) ENF 6 Review of Reports under A44(1) Updates to chapter... 3 1. What this chapter is about... 4 2. Program objectives... 4 3. The Act and Regulations... 4 3.1 Considerations... 5 3.2. Criminality R228(1)(a)...

More information

IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL]

IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL] PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL] Published by As it read between e 28th, 2012 and e 28th, 2012 Updated To: Important:

More information

A Very Busy Year: A Brief Review of the Major Changes Made to Immigration and Refugee Law in By Chris Veeman

A Very Busy Year: A Brief Review of the Major Changes Made to Immigration and Refugee Law in By Chris Veeman A Very Busy Year: A Brief Review of the Major Changes Made to Immigration and Refugee Law in 2012 2013 By Chris Veeman Veeman Law www.veemanlaw.com chris@veemanlaw.com The period from January 2012 to March

More information

IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION. What It Is and How It Works. qwewrt

IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION. What It Is and How It Works. qwewrt IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION What It Is and How It Works qwewrt ISBN 0-662 63824 7 Catalogue Number MQ21 18/1998 Produced by: Parliamentary and Public Affairs Immigration and Regugee Board Canada Building

More information

Gender Persecution and Refugee Law Reform in Canada. The Balanced Refugee Reform Act (BILL C-11) Lobat Sadrehashemi Battered Women s Support Services

Gender Persecution and Refugee Law Reform in Canada. The Balanced Refugee Reform Act (BILL C-11) Lobat Sadrehashemi Battered Women s Support Services Gender Persecution and Refugee Law Reform in Canada I N R E S P O N S E TO The Balanced Refugee Reform Act (BILL C-11) APRIL 2011 W R I T TE N BY FOR Lobat Sadrehashemi Battered Women s Support Services

More information

LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA INTRODUCTION Purpose and currency of checklist. This checklist is designed to be used with the CLIENT IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURE (A-1) checklist. It is intended for use by immigration counsel

More information

Mental Illness, Criminal OfFences, & Deportation Tips for front-line workers

Mental Illness, Criminal OfFences, & Deportation Tips for front-line workers Mental Illness, Criminal OfFences, & Deportation Tips for front-line workers Mental Illness, Criminal OfFences, & Deportation Tips for front-line workers This publication is for front-line workers and

More information

Country submission: Canada. 20 January 2014

Country submission: Canada. 20 January 2014 CONSEIL CANADIEN POUR LES RÉFUGIÉS CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES Submission to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention for consideration in Guiding Principles on the right of anyone deprived of his

More information

Immigration ADR: Back to the Future

Immigration ADR: Back to the Future Immigration ADR: Back to the Future Introduction Mario D. Bellissimo* Layers of voice mail, computerization, formality and lengthy hearings the first time the parties sat down in a room together marked

More information

Permanent Residence Alternatives H and C By Robin Seligman, Barrister & Solicitor and Cheryl Robinson, Barrister and Solicitor

Permanent Residence Alternatives H and C By Robin Seligman, Barrister & Solicitor and Cheryl Robinson, Barrister and Solicitor Workshop 3C CLE May 13, 2011 Permanent Residence Alternatives H and C By Robin Seligman, Barrister & Solicitor and Cheryl Robinson, Barrister and Solicitor The application of humanitarian and compassionate

More information

Evaluation of IRB s Case Scheduling Processes

Evaluation of IRB s Case Scheduling Processes Evaluation of IRB s Case Scheduling Processes December 2008 Prepared by for Corporate Planning and Management Practices Directorate CORPORATE PLANNING AND SERVICES BRANCH Table of Contents Executive Summary...1

More information

Bill C-31 Protecting Canada s Immigration System Act (PCISA) Presented by the Law Office of Adela Crossley

Bill C-31 Protecting Canada s Immigration System Act (PCISA) Presented by the Law Office of Adela Crossley Bill C-31 Protecting Canada s Immigration System Act (PCISA) Presented by the Law Office of Adela Crossley Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is based upon a legislative summary

More information

Attention: Paula Thompson, Director, Business Process Design

Attention: Paula Thompson, Director, Business Process Design Suite 400 510 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3A8 Tel: (604) 601-6000 Fax: (604) 682-0914 www.lss.bc.ca Office of the Executive Director December 14, 2010 VIA EMAIL Reform Office Immigration and Refugee

More information

Recent Developments in Refugee Law

Recent Developments in Refugee Law Recent Developments in Refugee Law Appellate Cases of Note Banafsheh Sokhansanj, Department of Justice Disclaimer This presentation reflects the views of Banafsheh Sokhansanj only, and not necessarily

More information

INDEX. (All references are to section number)

INDEX. (All references are to section number) (All references are to section number) CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES education 14.4 emerging trends 14.7 employment 14.3 housing 14.5 immigration inadmissibility 14.2 deemed rehabilitation

More information

INDEX. [Current to release ] (All references are to section number)

INDEX. [Current to release ] (All references are to section number) [Current to release 2014 3] (All references are to section number) CRIMINAL INADMISSIBILITY CITIZENS AND PERMA- NENT RESIDENTS admissibility hearings 3.8 decision making process 3.8(a) loss of permanent

More information

and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT Date: 20081106 Docket: IMM-2397-08 Citation: 2008 FC 1242 Toronto, Ontario, November 6, 2008 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes BETWEEN: JULIO ESCALONA PEREZ AND DENIS ALEXANDRA PEREZ DE ESCALONA

More information

New refugee system one year on 9 December 2013

New refugee system one year on 9 December 2013 CONSEIL CANADIEN POUR LES RÉFUGIÉS CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES New refugee system one year on 9 December 2013 On December 15, 2012, major changes to Canada s refugee determination system were implemented.

More information

REFUGEE CLAIMANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

REFUGEE CLAIMANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA REFUGEE CLAIMANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA // FAQs October 2018 bcrefugeehub.ca refugeehub@issbc.org @bcrefugeehub 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 // Making A Refugee Claim... 3 1. Who can make a claim for refugee

More information

September 10, 2012 VIA

September 10, 2012 VIA Suite 400 510 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3A8 Tel: (604) 601-6000 Fax: (604) 682-0914 www.lss.bc.ca Office of the Executive Director September 10, 2012 VIA EMAIL Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

More information

GUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION

GUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION GUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION Legal Services Table of Contents About the Guide to Proceedings Before the Immigration Division ii, iii Notes and references..iv Chapter 1... POWERS

More information

Modernization of Client Service Delivery

Modernization of Client Service Delivery Modernization of Client Service Delivery CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION January 2017 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925 toll free/sans frais : 1.800.267.8860

More information

Bill C-6, Citizenship Act amendments

Bill C-6, Citizenship Act amendments Bill C-6, Citizenship Act amendments CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION April 2016 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925 toll free/sans frais : 1.800.267.8860

More information

CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION CHANGES

CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION CHANGES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION CHANGES Supported by Law Foundation s Access to Justice Fund FCJ REFUGEE CENTRE Walking with uprooted people Who we are: non-profit organization which serves refugees and others

More information

IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL]

IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL] PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE PROTECTION ACT [FEDERAL] Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes 2017, c. 26 amendments

More information

Refugee Reform 2016 CCR recommendations. June 2016

Refugee Reform 2016 CCR recommendations. June 2016 Conseil canadien pour les réfugiés Canadian Council for Refugees Refugee Reform 2016 s June 2016 A. Making a claim o Inland claimants don t get access to services until they file all forms (including BOC)

More information

Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process

Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process The VA claims process is often complicated and frustrating. To confuse matters further, veterans law is not static. Statutes and regulations are amended, and decisions

More information

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents

More information

PP 4. Processing Protected Persons' in-canada Applications for Permanent Resident Status

PP 4. Processing Protected Persons' in-canada Applications for Permanent Resident Status PP 4 Processing Protected Persons' in-canada Applications for Permanent Resident Status Updates to chapter... 2 1. What this chapter is about... 2 2. Program objectives... 2 3. The Act and Regulations...

More information

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Performance Report For the period ending March 31, 2009 The Honourable Jason Kenney Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Table of Contents

More information

Submission on Bill C-18 Citizenship of Canada Act NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Submission on Bill C-18 Citizenship of Canada Act NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION Submission on Bill C-18 Citizenship of Canada Act NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION November 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Submission on Bill C-18 Citizenship of Canada

More information

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Interim Report in follow-up to the review of Canada s Sixth Report August 2013 Introduction 1. On May 21 and 22,

More information

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications

More information

Bill C-11, Balanced Refugee Reform Act

Bill C-11, Balanced Refugee Reform Act Bill C-11, Balanced Refugee Reform Act NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAW SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION May 2010 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925 toll

More information

Refugee Claims: Gathering Evidence, Maureen Silcoff Barrister & Solicitor

Refugee Claims: Gathering Evidence, Maureen Silcoff Barrister & Solicitor Refugee Claims: Gathering Evidence, Maureen Silcoff Barrister & Solicitor Preparation & Time Shortened timelines for Hearing Dates: They differ for different types of claims Non-DCO claimants: 60 days

More information

PRACTICE NOTE 1/2015

PRACTICE NOTE 1/2015 IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL PRACTICE NOTE 1/2015 (DEPORTATION - RESIDENT) (including any appeal under section 162 by a non-citizen previously recognised as a refugee or a protected person, whose

More information

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS IN EXAMINING APPLICATIONS FOR REFUGEE STATUS REGULATIONS

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS IN EXAMINING APPLICATIONS FOR REFUGEE STATUS REGULATIONS [S.L.420.07 1 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 420.07 REGULATIONS LEGAL NOTICE 243 of 2008. 3rd October, 2008 1. The title of these regulations is the Procedural Standards in Examining Applications for Refugee Status

More information

Refugee Claimants in Canada

Refugee Claimants in Canada Refugee Claimants in Canada Erin C. Roth, Lawyer EDELMANN & CO. LAW OFFICES 21 February 2018 What is a refugee? Convention refugee A person, outside of their country of origin, who seeks protection by

More information

Canadian Centre on Statelessness Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion

Canadian Centre on Statelessness Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion Canadian Centre on Statelessness Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 30 th Session of the Universal Periodic Review (Third Cycle, May 2018) Canada

More information

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA ' l.. GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$4.68 WINDHOEK 19 March 1999 No. 2065 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 41 Promulgation of Namibia Refugees (Recognition and Control) Act, 1999 (Act

More information

Etienne v. MPSEP: Constitutional Challenge to the PRRA Bar (s. 112(2)(b.1) of the IRPA) Presented at the CARL Conference, October 16, 2014

Etienne v. MPSEP: Constitutional Challenge to the PRRA Bar (s. 112(2)(b.1) of the IRPA) Presented at the CARL Conference, October 16, 2014 Etienne v. MPSEP: Constitutional Challenge to the PRRA Bar (s. 112(2)(b.1) of the IRPA) Presented at the CARL Conference, October 16, 2014 1 The PRRA BAR was Manifestly Unconstitutional The PRRA Bar constitutional

More information

Immigration and Refugee Board

Immigration and Refugee Board Immigration and Refugee Board Part III Report on Plans and Priorities 2003-2004 Estimates Denis Coderre Minister of Citizenship and Immigration TABLE OF CONTENTS I. MESSAGES...1 1.1 Chairperson s Message...1

More information

The emotional reaction to 490 Tamil

The emotional reaction to 490 Tamil COMMENTARY THE SUN SEA TAMIL MASS REFUGEE CLAIM: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR NEEDED REFORMS By Scott Newark Executive Summary The emotional reaction to 490 Tamil refugee seekers arriving on the MV Sun Sea should

More information

RE-INVENTING CRIMINAL JUSTICE:

RE-INVENTING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: RE-INVENTING CRIMINAL JUSTICE: THE NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM Final Report The Fairmont Empress Victoria, BC January 13/ 14 2012 The Fourth National Criminal Justice Symposium In January 2012, approximately 75

More information

Refugee Hearing Preparation

Refugee Hearing Preparation Refugee Hearing Preparation A Guide for Refugee Claimants Edmonton, Alberta Language Guide Contents Making a Refugee Claim 2 15 Refugee Protection Overview 2 Timeline and Important Dates 5 Getting Legal

More information

Note on the Cancellation of Refugee Status

Note on the Cancellation of Refugee Status Note on the Cancellation of Refugee Status Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES 3 A. General considerations 3 B. General legal principles 3 C. Opening cancellation

More information

CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT

CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT REFUGEES [CAP. 420. 1 CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT AN ACT to make provisions relating to and establishing procedures with regard to refugees and asylum seekers. ACT XX of 2000. 1st October, 2001 PART I General

More information

Table of Contents. CON-1 (Mental Disorder) (2013-3)

Table of Contents. CON-1 (Mental Disorder) (2013-3) Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE... 1-1 (a) Pre-1992 Amendments... 1-1 (b) The Reform Movement... 1-4 (c) The Swain Decision... 1-6 (d) The 1992 Amendments: Part XX.1

More information

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Contents Part 1 Underpinning knowledge...3 1.1 An understanding

More information

Parliamentary Research Branch IMMIGRATION: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES. Margaret Young Law and Government Division. October 1991 Revised October 1992

Parliamentary Research Branch IMMIGRATION: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES. Margaret Young Law and Government Division. October 1991 Revised October 1992 Background Paper BP-273E IMMIGRATION: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Margaret Young Law and Government Division October 1991 Revised October 1992 Library of Parliament Bibliothèque du Parlement Parliamentary Research

More information

BRIEF OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS

BRIEF OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS BRIEF OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEE LAWYERS Regarding sections 172 and 173 of Budget Bill C-43, thus amending the Federal- Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act Presented to the Citizenship and Immigration

More information

CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES Three key issues: October 2004

CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES Three key issues: October 2004 Three key issues: October 2004 ISSUE: DELAYS UNDERMINE PRIVATE SPONSORSHIP OF REFUGEES PROGRAM Refugees overseas and their Canadian sponsors are subject to extraordinarily long delays in processing at

More information

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or

More information

(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda)

(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda) Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda

More information

FCJ Refugee Centre. Walking with Uprooted People. How to provide support clients detained under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

FCJ Refugee Centre. Walking with Uprooted People. How to provide support clients detained under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act How to provide support clients detained under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act INTRODUCTION This document has 2 sections: the first section is an explanation of what happens at the Toronto Immigration

More information

Effective January 1, 2016

Effective January 1, 2016 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before

More information

JUDICIAL REVIEWS TO THE FEDERAL COURT

JUDICIAL REVIEWS TO THE FEDERAL COURT JUDICIAL REVIEWS TO THE FEDERAL COURT WHAT IS JUDICIAL REVIEW Application to the Federal Court asking it to review a decision made by an administrative body, which the applicant believes was wrongly made

More information

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Part III Report on Plans and Priorities 2011-12 Estimates The original version was signed by The Honourable Jason Kenney Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and

More information

Applications by the Minister for Cessation Under IRPA s. 108(1)(a) to (d) and the loss of permanent residence under IRPA s. 40.

Applications by the Minister for Cessation Under IRPA s. 108(1)(a) to (d) and the loss of permanent residence under IRPA s. 40. It s The New Cessation Applications by the Minister for Cessation Under IRPA s. 108(1)(a) to (d) and the loss of permanent residence under IRPA s. 40.1(2) Canadian Bar Association National Immigration

More information

OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!

OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! ROBERT S. HARRISON JENNIFER McALEER FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP THE BASICS What is an Objection? By definition an objection is an interruption. It should only be made when it is

More information

You may request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals if you:

You may request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals if you: 1 of 16 8/3/2012 1:30 PM Over the past three years, this Administration has undertaken an unprecedented effort to transform the immigration enforcement system into one that focuses on public safety, border

More information

JAIME CARRASCO VARELA. and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION. Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 28, 2009.

JAIME CARRASCO VARELA. and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION. Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 28, 2009. Date: 20090506 Docket: A-210-08 Citation: 2009 FCA 145 CORAM: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JAIME CARRASCO VARELA Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard

More information

CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Formal administrative hearings are one of the options provided to a person who has significant (or substantial) interests that will be affected

More information

Reasons and Decision Motifs et décision

Reasons and Decision Motifs et décision IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE BOARD OF CANADA IMMIGRATION APPEAL DIVISION COMMISSION DE L IMMIGRATION ET DU STATUT DE RÉFUGIÉ DU CANADA SECTION D APPEL DE L IMMIGRATION Appellant(s) IAD File No. / N o de dossier

More information

IAAF DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL RULES

IAAF DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL RULES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 On 3 April 2017, a Disciplinary Tribunal was established in accordance with Article 18.1 of the IAAF Constitution. Its role, among other things, is to hear and determine all breaches

More information

Khosa: Extending and Clarifying Dunsmuir

Khosa: Extending and Clarifying Dunsmuir Khosa: Extending and Clarifying Dunsmuir Andrew Wray, Pinto Wray James LLP Christian Vernon, Pinto Wray James LLP [awray@pintowrayjames.com] [cvernon@pintowrayjames.com] Introduction The Supreme Court

More information

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES October 2018 Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know Asylum Definition: An applicant for asylum has the burden to demonstrate that he or she is eligible

More information

Claiming Refugee Protection Under the. Francisco Rico-Martinez (Co- Director) FCJ Refugee Center February 2013

Claiming Refugee Protection Under the. Francisco Rico-Martinez (Co- Director) FCJ Refugee Center February 2013 Claiming Refugee Protection Under the Francisco Rico-Martinez (Co- Director) FCJ Refugee Center February 2013 Categories of Refugee Under the new system, refugee claimants are divided into three categories:

More information

Temporary Resident Permits: Limits to protection for trafficked persons

Temporary Resident Permits: Limits to protection for trafficked persons Canadian Council for Refugees Conseil canadien pour les réfugiés Temporary Resident Permits: Limits to protection for trafficked persons In May 2006, the Canadian government issued guidelines for temporary

More information

Who s who in a Criminal Trial

Who s who in a Criminal Trial Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being

More information

Visa Entry to the United Kingdom The Entry Clearance Operation

Visa Entry to the United Kingdom The Entry Clearance Operation Visa Entry to the United Kingdom The Entry Clearance Operation REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 367 Session 2003-2004: 17 June 2004 LONDON: The Stationery Office 10.75 Ordered by the House

More information

Submissions to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration on Immigration, Refugee, Citizenship and Paralegal Practitioners

Submissions to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration on Immigration, Refugee, Citizenship and Paralegal Practitioners Submissions to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration on Immigration, Refugee, Citizenship and Paralegal Practitioners I. INTRODUCTION by Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic

More information

SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL AFFAIRS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL AFFAIRS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL AFFAIRS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Bill C-6: An Act to Amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act March 2017 The BC

More information

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Board of Veterans' Appeals Washington DC January 2000

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Board of Veterans' Appeals Washington DC January 2000 Dear BVA Customer: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Board of Veterans' Appeals Washington DC 20420 January 2000 We can t give you directions for how to win your appeal in a general publication like this

More information

Bill C-24 - Citizenship bill Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees. 26 March 2014

Bill C-24 - Citizenship bill Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees. 26 March 2014 CONSEIL CANADIEN POUR LES RÉFUGIÉS CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES Bill C-24 - Citizenship bill Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees 26 March 2014 Introduction Bill C-24, an Act to the amend the

More information

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle Policy: Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult Policy Code: VUL 1 Effective Date: March 1, 2018 Cross-references: CHA 1 DIR 1 Principle The BC Prosecution Service recognizes that serious cases with adult

More information

Case Name: Rocha v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

Case Name: Rocha v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Case Name: Rocha v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Between Andro Rocha, Applicant, and The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Respondent [2015] F.C.J. No. 1087 2015 FC 1070 Docket:

More information

BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79. Reference No: IACDT 020/14

BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79. Reference No: IACDT 020/14 BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 79 Reference No: IACDT 020/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing

More information

THE NEED TO PROTECT RULE OF LAW: A RESPONSE TO BILL C-24

THE NEED TO PROTECT RULE OF LAW: A RESPONSE TO BILL C-24 POLICY BRIEF May 2014 THE NEED TO PROTECT RULE OF LAW: A RESPONSE TO BILL C-24 Andrew S. Thompson Andrew S. Thompson is an adjunct assistant professor of Political Science at the University of Waterloo,

More information

As soon as possible in s. 48(2) of IRPA: Not possible to Enforce Removals in Breach of the Rule of Law and the Charter

As soon as possible in s. 48(2) of IRPA: Not possible to Enforce Removals in Breach of the Rule of Law and the Charter As soon as possible in s. 48(2) of IRPA: Not possible to Enforce Removals in Breach of the Rule of Law and the Charter Presented at the Canadian Bar Association 2014 National Immigration Law Conference

More information

Citizenship & Immigration Canada Hiring Temporary Foreign Workers

Citizenship & Immigration Canada Hiring Temporary Foreign Workers Citizenship & Immigration Canada Hiring Temporary Foreign Workers 1. What is a Work Permit & Exemptions Working in Canada Legislative authority lies with Citizenship and Immigration Canada as governed

More information

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Part III Report on Plans and Priorities 2006-2007 Estimates Monte Solberg Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Table of Contents Section 1: Overview 1 Message

More information

These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12, 2017.

These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12, 2017. Linda Kenepaske Law Offices of Linda Kenepaske, PLLC 17 Battery Place, Suite 1226 These materials were originally submitted in conjunction with the program The Basics of Removal Defense held on June 12,

More information

PRESENTED BY FRANCISCO RICO. Supported by Law Foundation s Access to Justice Fund

PRESENTED BY FRANCISCO RICO. Supported by Law Foundation s Access to Justice Fund PRESENTED BY FRANCISCO RICO Supported by Law Foundation s Access to Justice Fund non-profit organization which serves refugees and others at risk due to their immigration status We welcome anyone asking

More information

Presented by Cornelia Mazgarean (Community Legal Aid. On behalf of the Inter-Clinic Immigration Working Group of Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario

Presented by Cornelia Mazgarean (Community Legal Aid. On behalf of the Inter-Clinic Immigration Working Group of Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario Presented by Cornelia Mazgarean (Community Legal Aid Services Programme) and Jennifer Stone (Neighbourhood Legal Services) On behalf of the Inter-Clinic Immigration Working Group of Legal Aid Clinics in

More information

Fast and Efficient but not Fair Recommendations with respect to Bill C-11

Fast and Efficient but not Fair Recommendations with respect to Bill C-11 Fast and Efficient but not Fair Recommendations with respect to Bill C-11 Amnesty International Canada s Brief to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration May 11, 2010 INTRODUCTION

More information

IMMIGRATION Canada. Applying to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident Permit Holder. Table of Contents

IMMIGRATION Canada. Applying to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident Permit Holder. Table of Contents Citizenship and Immigration Canada Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada IMMIGRATION Canada Applying to Remain in Canada as a Temporary Resident Permit Holder Table of Contents Overview.........................

More information

Introduction to the Main Amendments made to the Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC 1996 Professor Fan Chongyi China University of Politics and Law

Introduction to the Main Amendments made to the Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC 1996 Professor Fan Chongyi China University of Politics and Law Introduction to the Main Amendments made to the Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC 1996 Professor Fan Chongyi China University of Politics and Law The Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC was passed at the

More information

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India

More information

RE: CAPIC Response to the Report of the Independent Review of the Immigration and Refugee Board

RE: CAPIC Response to the Report of the Independent Review of the Immigration and Refugee Board The Honourable Ahmed Hussen, P.C., M.P. Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0A6 RE: CAPIC Response to the Report of the Independent Review of the

More information

NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1

NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 Question: The Ethics Counselors of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) have been asked to address the following scenario: An investigator working for Defense

More information

STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC OFFENCES A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER

STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC OFFENCES A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING TRAFFIC version: 2009 STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES OF EDMONTON GENERAL All information is provided for general knowledge purposes only and is

More information

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Part III Report on Plans and Priorities 2012 13 Estimates The original version was signed by The Honourable Jason Kenney Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and

More information

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process The following notes have been prepared to explain the complaints process under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance

More information