Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History

Transcription

1 Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History

2

3 Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History Hall Gardner

4 crimea, global rivalry, and the vengeance of history Copyright Hall Gardner, All rights reserved. First published in 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN in the United States a division of St. Martin s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY Where this book is distributed in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world, this is by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number , of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave and Macmillan are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN ISBN (ebook) DOI / Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. A catalogue record of the book is available from the British Library. Design by Scribe Inc. First edition: September

5 Contents Preface General Introduction: The Vengeance of History 1 1 Renewed Cold War? World War II? World War I? Or Nothing of the Kind? 17 2 Genesis of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict 29 3 Soviet Collapse and the Russia-Ukraine Conflict 43 4 Origins of the Russian Backlash 59 5 Uneven Polycentrism and the Global Crisis 81 6 A Cross-Historical Method 99 7 Why Major-Power War Is Still Possible, Though Not Inevitable! Future Pessimistic Scenarios Once, and If, the Dust Settles 169 Notes 199 Selected Bibliography 235 Index 239 vii

6

7 Preface Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History picks up on my previous two Palgrave-Macmillan books, Averting Global War (2007) and NATO Expansion and US Strategy in Asia (2013). Averting Global War warned of a potential Georgia-Russia war in addition to the possibility of a Russia-Ukraine conflict. NATO Expansion and US Strategy in Asia had proposed the internationalization of Russian port of Sevastopol, plus the formation of a regional peace and development community for the Black Sea and Caucasus regions involving a system of joint NATO-EU-Russian security guarantees, with the deployment of international peacekeepers. These options were proposed as an alternative to a NATO enlargement to Georgia and Ukraine and in order to prevent the eventual partition of the Black Sea region into pro-nato and pro-russian states. These proposals were made precisely in the hope that it might still be possible to avert the burgeoning Russian pan-nationalist threat to retake Crimea in opposition to both NATO and EU enlargement in the midst of Ukrainian bankruptcy and sociopolitical strife. Now, however, the Crimean crisis represents the return of history with a vengeance in that it impacts political-economic and financial relations between Russia, China, the European Union, and much of the world, in addition to interlinking directly and indirectly with a number of regional conflicts throughout the globe, including the wider Middle East, South and Central Asia, the eastern Mediterranean, and the Indo-Pacific. While the Crimean crisis represents the latest manifestation, but not the root cause of the decline of US-EU-Russian relations in the post Cold War period, the annexation indicates the need for the United States and the European Union to begin to work toward a coherent global strategy toward Russia that includes consideration of China, India, Japan, and other rising powers and socio-political movements and that is designed to avert the potential for much wider regional conflicts if not the real possibility of a major-power war.

8 viii Preface Proposals for the internationalization of the Crimea and Black Sea region, among other options involving power sharing and joint sovereignty for island and resource disputes in the Indo-Pacific and elsewhere, would represent steps toward peace and reconciliation with both Russia and China and with all other states concerned that is, once, and if, the dust begins to settle. I would like to thank Sara Doskow and Jeff LaSala for their support for my third Palgrave-Macmillan book project, plus Megan Bailey at Scribe for her assistance in finalizing the text. My AUP assistants, Anna Wiersma and Hannah Victoria, were of great help with the index. Andrei Grachev, William Hartung, Robert M. Hayden, Jan Kavan, and Nick Petro all provided useful information. And I thank my anonymous reviewer for his praise and positive suggestions! And finally, I thank my wife, Isabel, my daughters, Francesca and Celine, and Celine s husband, Alan, for putting up with another book project, with more soon to follow! Hall Gardner (Paris, June 11, 2015)