REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IS A.C.T) ^
|
|
- Lesley Bradford
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IS A.C.T) ^ PARRAMATTA ROAD CAMPERDOWN NSW2050 LOCKED BAG 15, CAMPERDOWN P.O. NSW 2050 i Q, TELEPHONE: (02) FAX: (02) ' inny v ^U^ REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA BRIEFING PAPER ON THE BOAT PEOPLE May This briefing paper contains information about the current situation with respect to the Cambodian, Vietnamese and Chinese asylum seekers who arrived by boat and outlines RCOA 's involvement and position.1 Contents: 1. Description of Events 2. Status of the Detainees 3. Current Legal Responsibilities 4. Position on the Detainees This document is a supplement to RCOA's Position Paper with respect to Asylum Seekers and the Refugee Determination Procedure (May 1992) % RCOA represents over 50 non-government organisations working with and for refugees in Australia and around the world.
2 1. DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS : The following is a brief summary of major events in relation to the boat people : November First boat arrived. March (see 2.1). December Eight other boat arrivals August Detainees kept in Darwin, Sydney, Melbourne and small numbers elsewhere. In many cases primary applications were submitted without legal advice. Intervention enabled volunteer lawyers to by lawyers and support groups assist clients. Progress was slow because the lawyers had to work in their own time and under considerable logistical difficulties such as a lack of interpreters and the distance of the camp from Darwin. The lawyers in Darwin were also advised by the Department of Immigration (DILGEA ) that there was no need to rush the applications because DILGEA did not have the administrative capacity to process the applications due to delays caused by the introduction of the new procedures. May A group of Cambodians were moved from Sydney to Darwin under high security, attracting considerable media attention. August The move of the Cambodians from Melbourne to Sydney resulted in the first agreement being made with DILGEA for the funding of independent legal advice by the Refugee Advice and Casework Service (RACS ) Victoria. October With the exception of the asylum seekers from the Beagle Boat (see 2.1), all boat arrivals sent to Port Hedland. Negotiations took place between DILGEA and RCOA for the provision of legal advice for these people. A team of advisers was sent to Port Hedland for four weeks to assist with the completion of outstanding Primary Applications. January Following eventual payment for Phase I at Port Hedland, negotiations began between DILGEA and RCOA for the provision of a long term legal advice service at Port Hedland. A team of legal advisers and interpreters commenced work on 3rd February, 1992.
3 February The Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission sent a draft report to DILGEA which examined the conditions of detention of the asylum seekers and listed a significant number of perceived abuses of national laws and international instruments to which Australia is a signatory. New procedures for the processing of asylum seekers were announced. These have significant implications for border claimants in that they severely limit the time in which an applicant can prepare a claim for refugee status (the first interview being scheduled within 2-3 days of arrival ). RCOA was approached by DILGEA to provide a legal advice service for the 56 recently arrived Chinese who were to be the first processed under the new regulations. RCOA 's contention that the time frame was too restrictive resulted in DILGEA engaging the services of Australian Lawyers for Refugees, Inc (ALRI ). March Visits to Port Hedland Detention Centre by delegation from the Australian Council of Churches and the Executive Director of the Refugee Council. General agreement on major deficiencies in the facility, in particular in relation to failure to adequately cater for the following needs : interpreters education recreation medical care (in particular specialised torture and trauma counselling ) religious support cultural support There were also a number of procedural problems identified such as the difficulty of obtaining community access, inadequate training of security staff, unnecessary use of force, poor communication between DILGEA camp staff and the detainees etc. April DILGEA issued final rejection notices to 37 Cambodian asylum seekers and arrangements for their deportation were commenced. Minister Hand issued a press release (8/4/92) which said in part : "It is my firm view that the proper process of refugee determination has been followed throughout.. The people concerned have been given every opportunity to present their cases, with natural justice provisions scrupulously observed at every step ". On the basis of perceived irregularities in the processing of the claims, groups of lawyers in Darwin and Melbourne volunteered their services to challenge the decision in the federal court.
4 - DILGEA conceded that they were unable to defend the court action and revoked the final decisions. The court ordered that a new decision maker be appointed, that reports from the Department of Foreign Affairs be made available within two weeks 2 and that DILGEA pay all court costs. The rejections provoked a flood of public sympathy / with expressions of support for the asylum seekers coming from a wide cross section of the community. Further federal court action was taken on behalf of the 37 rejected applicants. This was intended to challenge their continued detention while their claims for refugee status were being re-examined. In preparation for the federal court hearing, lawyers had gathered a significant number of affidavits from church and community groups and individuals guaranteeing that in the event of the release of the asylum seekers / all their material needs would be provided at no cost to the taxpayer. While the fate of the 37 Cambodians (plus the other 400 boat people ) remained in the balance / Paul Keating confirmed the Chinese in Australia at the time of the Tienanmen Square Massacre and their dependents (an estimated 34,000 people ) would not be returned to China against their will. May Two days before the legality of the prolonged detention of 37 asylum seekers (and others ) was to be examined in the federal court, the government rushed through legislation that prevented the court from ordering their release. The Human Rights Commission issued a statement saying that the new legislation is in contravention of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, one of the most important human rights treaties against which the performance of governments around the world is measured. The federal court sat on 7th May, with costs being awarded against the government and the case adjourned. The high court will consider the legality of the legislation on a date to be set. Ten Chinese asylum seekers (from the Isabella boat ) were taken to Roebourne Prison. Seven had left the camp for a walk, the other three done little to single themselves out for this treatment. Contrary to what is contained in the Ministerial press release of 4/5/92, they were unable to access a lawyer for several weeks and 4 As of late May, these reports had still not been made available.
5 the only interpreters available are via the Telephone Interpreter Service. An additional 2 Chinese were subsequently moved to Roebourne Prison. An additional 10 Chinese asylum seekers arrived in Australia on 10th May. (more detailed chronologies of the involvement of the legal advisers exist. for those who have a particular -interest -in this area). 2. STATUS OF THE DETAINEES Boat Arrivals Between 28th November, 1989 and 10th May, 1992, ten unauthorised boats arrived in Australia: Boat No Persons Nationality Arrival Current On Board Date Location of Majority Fender Bay 26 Cambodian 28 Nov 89 Port Hedland Beagle 119 Cambodian 31 Mar 90 Sydney Collie 79 Cambodian 1 Jun 90 Port Hedland Dalmatian Chinese 4 Mar 91 Port Hedland 14 Macauans repatriated Hong Kong resident repatriated Echo 35 Cambodian 6 Mar 91 Port Hedland Foxtrot 3 2 Indonesians repatriated Bangladeshi repatriated George 77 Cambodian 26 Apr 91 Port Hedland Vietnamese PRC Nationals Harry 10 Vietnamese 9 May 91 Port Hedland Isabella 56 PRC Nationals 31 Dec 91 Port Hedland Roebourne Jeremiah 10 PRC Nationals 10 May 92 Darwin
6 2.2. Current Status 2 cases (6 people ) have been granted refugee status. 3 people (2 females, 1 male ) have been released to join spouses in Australia, HZ and USA. 4 people (2 adults, one youth and one infant) returned voluntarily to Cambodia earlier this year. The 18 people from Macau, Hong Kong, Bangladesh and Indonesia did not apply for refugee status and thus were repatriated. 37 (from the Fender Bay and Beagle boats ) received their final rejection notice on 6th April. Following the Federal Court challenge this was revoked and the applications are being reviewed by a new decision maker. The remainder still in detention have their claims in the primary and appeal stages of the application process. 24 people have escaped during their long detention while in Melbourne or Sydney and are still at large. The others returned voluntarily. There have been no "escapes " from Port Hedland (just instances of "temporary leave of absence "). 12 Chinese from the Isabella boat were moved from Port Hedland to Roebourne Prison in early May. 3. CURRENT LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Legal responsibilities for the asylum seekers currently in detention are as follows : 3.1. Primary Applications and Appeals: RCOA has a team of 5 lawyers, together with support staff, who have been working in Port Hedland with some 180 Cambodians, 25 Vietnamese and 20 Chinese since 3rd February With the exception of the brief period in late 1991, these people previously
7 had been represented by volunteer lawyers.3 RACS Victoria is providing legal advice (with DILGEA funding since their move from Melbourne ) to almost all the Cambodians detained in Sydney. RACS NSW is working with one client transferred from Port Hedland on medical grounds, and a small number have independent lawyers (funded by legal aid ). Australian Lawyers for Refugees, Inc (ALRI ) have been engaged by DILGEA to represent the 56 Chinese detained in the Kimberleys early this year and the 10 Chinese who arrived in May Federal Court Challenge : 26 Primary Applicants (37 people, all Cambodians ) received their final rejection on 6th April, Concern over the procedural fairness of their assessment and the continuation of their detention prompted two groups of lawyers to initiate action on their behalf : For the 23 Cambodians in Port Hedland : a group of barristers from Darwin volunteered their services. They had worked with these people on a voluntary basis when they were held in Darwin and had closely followed their progress since. The group contains several senior barristers, including QCs. Funding was obtained from the Northern Territory Legal Aid Commission and an anonymous donor to cover the costs involved in preparing for the case. In both actions, however, costs were awarded against the government. For the Cambodians in Villawood ; a group of lawyers from Melbourne offered their assistance. These are principally barristers and solicitors associated with RACS Victoria through their support network. Funding has been sought from Legal Aid and from a Melbourne Law Firm, though much of the legal work is being done voluntarily. It is significant to note that it was not until the asylum seekers were moved away from their volunteer legal advisers that the Department of Immigration provided the funds necessary for the continuation of the legal advice.
8 RCOA position in relation to the provision of legal advice to asylum seekers: Direct involvement of RCOA in the provision of legal advice to asylum seekers should terminate at the end of the administrative processing. Any judicial action deemed necessary should normally be the responsibility of lawyers working and funded independently. 4. POSITION ON THE DETAINEES: 4.1. Some Views on the Cambodian Asylum Seekers and the Peace Process: Suggesting that the Cambodian asylum seekers remain in Australia in no way contradicts RCOA 's support of the Peace Process in Cambodia and the repatriation of the border population. The following facts should be considered : The Cambodian asylum seekers left Cambodia before the Peace Accord was signed and at a time when it appeared unlikely that it ever would be. While Mr Hand may claim that they are "queue jumpers ", there was no queue for them to jump. There was no legal way for them to leave Cambodia. The Department of Immigration, in dismissing their claims for refugee status, acknowledges that many faced persecution at the time of their departure but claim that substantial and material changes have taken /will take place in Cambodia. They base this assertion largely on confidential documents from the Department of Foreign Affairs which cannot be checked and dismiss a substantial amount of contradictory information, particularly that relating to treatment of ethnic groups (many of the applicants are ethnic Chinese ) and people perceived to be dissidents. The return of the border population is part of the political settlement. Even their return is uncertain because of difficulties obtaining funds, delays in mine clearance and the possibilities of cease -fire violations. 8
9 RCOA position on the Cambodian Peace Process! a) While recognising the current peace process in Cambodia is fraught with danger and uncertainties, RCOA supports : 1. The objectives of the peace process. 2. The role of the Australian Government in supporting the peace process. 3. The voluntary, and closely monitored, return of the border population. b ) RCOA contends that its support for the peace process is not contradictory to its support for the granting of protection to the Cambodians currently seeking asylum in Australia until after the scheduled elections Some views on the Vietnamese and Chinese Asylum Seekers: Thus far, much of the media attention and discussion has focussed on the Cambodians. It is important that we do not lose sight of the fact that there are some 45 Vietnamese and Chinese who have been in Australia for a year or so in addition to the further groups of Chinese who arrived in late 1991 and mid The majority are at the appeal stage. Some primary applications are outstanding. It is clear from discussions with the lawyers that many of these people have claims of substance eg : Vietnamese Male : Formerly KCO in South Vietnamese Navy ; spent 90% of the last 15 years in prison and reeducation camps, including 9 years for attempting to leave Vietnam ; during imprisonment held in darkened cell for 7 months / beaten etc resulting in damage to eyesight. Also : initially denied access to lawyer by DILGEA and there was no interpreter at his DORS interview. Family group (6 people ): born Vietnam, ethnic Chinese expelled to China in In China denied citizenship, employment, freedom to practice religion. Woman arrested and returned because of pregnancy. Family member escaped to Vietnam, arrested and returned to China.
10 Involved in pro-democracy movement, detained for 6 months following Tienanmen Square Massacre. Claim based on persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion AND membership of a social group. There is evidence that DILGEA is giving little credence to the claims these people are making as none have yet been accepted for refugee status. In rejecting their claims the Department has used some extraordinary tactics including the misquoting shown below: Extract from Delegate's letter of reiection: "In this respect, I consider that the objective situation, as evidenced by material available to me, indicates that the Vietnamese government attitude to and treatment of those who have illegally departed and now returned to Vietnam, has altered considerably since I refer firstly to the "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1991" by the US State Department, published in February 1992, which states in the chapter on Vietnam that: "Vietnamese who emigrate are generally free to return. The Vietnamese Government regards overseas Vietnamese both as a valuable source of foreign exchange and expertise...thus, the government generally granted visas to overseas Vietnamese and encouraged them to visit Vietnam whether they emigrated legally or had been granted permanent resettlement after illegal departures from Vietnam"." The full text4 of the paragraph quoted above: "Vietnamese who emigrate are generally free to return. The Vietnamese Government regards overseas Vietnamese both as a valuable potential source of foreign exchange and expertise and as a potential security threat. Thus, the Government generally granted visas to overseas Vietnamese and encouraged them to visit Vietnam whether they emigrated legally or had been granted permanent resettlement after illegal departures from Vietnam. At the same time the public Security Police keep an eye on them, especially those who come under suspicion as a result of their actions or associations. During the year some Overseas Vietnamese were arrested, detained, and deported for activities deemed to be subversive as described in section i.d. above." RCOA Resolution: In any discussion of the detained boat people, attention should focus on the Vietnamese and Chinese as well as the Cambodians. They too have been denied the opportunity for their possible humanitarian claims to be considered and they have been subjected to the same treatment is Australia as the Cambodians. This raises the additional issue of the absolute necessity of making available to all parties documents used in the determination of a claim. 10
11 4.3. The Humanitarian Issue; While in Australia the asylum seekers have been treated badly. They have been detained (some for almost two and half years ) and have been denied many fundamental rights. According to the Human Rights Commission, their treatment has involved multiple breaches of several international instruments - to which Australia is a signatory including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights / the Declaration on the Rights of the Child and the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. The Commission / in their draft report, also raised the issue of adherence to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act 1986 and the Racial Discrimination Act KGOs have been slow to respond on this issue, the Refugee Council being no exception. Failure to act in the past is, however, no excuse for not taking a firm line on this issue now. RCOA Resolutio n : RCOA both directly and through REFPAC, should analyse the report of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission when released and monitor the Government 's response, formulating a position accordingly. Future action may take the form of representation to the UN Commission for Human Rights and /or UNHCR ExComm..4 Why Have the Boatpeople Been Detained? Until the new legislation was introduced on 5th May, 1992 the reason for the detention of the boatpeople rested solely on their method of arrival. Those who arrived by boat or aeroplane and were detained by immigration officials before having technically entered Australia, were deemed not to have entered the country and were classified as Prohibited Non -entrants. They were covered by Sections 88 and 89 of the Migration Act which was interpreted as allowing for their detention for the duration of the determination process. People like the 56 ambulatory Chinese who were apprehended in Australia after having entered without completing the necessary formalities, were classified as Illegal Entrants and came under Section 92 of the Migration Act. Those detained under this section of the Act had to have their cases reviewed by a magistrate every 7 days or as directed. 11
12 People who come to Australia on a visitor or student visa and then apply for refugee status, even if their entry permit has lapsed, are permitted to remain at liberty in the community (with occasional exceptions, eg if the person has real or suspected criminal record). One significant issue in the case of the detainees (those held under Sections 88, 89 and 92) is that unlike the situation for "legal " entrants, the RSRC does not have the discretionary power to recommend these people to the Minister for humanitarian protection (see also 4.3). According to the lawyers who are working with the claimants, all of the people would have very strong humanitarian claims. Furthermore, it appears that some of the boat arrivals actually spent time on Australia soil before being apprehended. This is of particular significance because had they been held under Section 92 not 88, they would have had access to humanitarian status (the cut off date for this was July 1991). Their detention would also have been illegal (as they have not been brought before a magistrate on a weekly basis ). The new legislation introduced in early May, however, changes things significantly. It allows for the detention of all "designated persons " ie non-citizens who arrive or have arrived in Australia by boat without a visa between 19th November 1989 and 1st December 1992 thereby removing grounds to challenge detention The Use of Port Hedland for a Detention Facility: It is the Refugee Council 's belief that the Port Hedland Reception and Processing Centre, located in NW Western Australia may well be a suitable facility for the limited duration detention of people caught fishing in Australia 's territorial waters but it is entirely unsuitable for the long term detention of asylum seekers. Port Hedland is an unsuitable location because it is too isolated from services considered essential for asylum seekers, namely : Legal advisers with demonstrated experience in assisting with asylum claims. Interpreters accredited in the language of the applicants. Counsellors with specific expertise in dealing with victims of torture and trauma. 12
13 * Medical and dental practitioners skilled in cross - cultural communication. Religious leaders from the applicant 's community who provide both religious and cultural support. Contact with family members and other nationals. Furthermore, after 9 months of operation, the Port Hedland Centre is still deficient in areas unrelated to its location -, in particular : The provision of education in all curriculum areas for school-aged children. Training for adults in vocational skills. Culturally appropriate recreational activities, especially for women and children. Provision for contact with community support groups. RCOA position on the use of Port Hedland Receptio n and Processing Centre : RCOA opposes the use of the Port Hedland Centre for the detention of asylum seekers. RCOA believes that If asylum seekers are to de detained. It should be In facilities specifically Intended for this purpose and located In either Sydney or Melbourne so that essential services can be accessed. RCOA's Position on the issue of Detention can be found in RCOA's Position Paper (May, 1992).
A v. Australia, Communication No. 560/1993, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993 (30 April 1997).
A v. Australia, Communication No. 560/1993, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993 (30 April 1997). A (name deleted) v. Australia, Communication No. 560/1993, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993 (30 April 1997). -
More informationVietnamese boat people crisis in Hong Kong Carina Hoang
Vietnamese boat people crisis in Hong Kong 1975 2000 Carina Hoang Vietnamese boat people (VBP) Causes: Escape persecutions by the communist regime Ethnic cleansing of Chinese-Vietnamese Statistics: 840,000
More informationFEDERAL BUDGET IN BRIEF: WHAT IT MEANS FOR REFUGEES AND PEOPLE SEEKING HUMANITARIAN PROTECTION
2015-16 FEDERAL BUDGET IN BRIEF: WHAT IT MEANS FOR REFUGEES AND PEOPLE SEEKING HUMANITARIAN PROTECTION KEY POINTS The Refugee and Humanitarian Program will provide 13,750 places in 2015-16, the same number
More informationNew Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices
New Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices Marie-Charlotte de Lapaillone The purpose of this report is to understand New Zealand s approach to its legal obligations concerning
More informationMIGRATION LAW IMPACTS OF INFRINGEMENTS AND MINOR CRIMINAL MATTERS FOR NON-CITIZEN CLIENTS 1 *
MIGRATION LAW IMPACTS OF INFRINGEMENTS AND MINOR CRIMINAL MATTERS FOR NON-CITIZEN CLIENTS 1 * PURPOSE This fact sheet is designed for lawyers, financial counsellors and others assisting clients who do
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 info@refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationAUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT (ALLEGIANCE TO AUSTRALIA) BILL 2015
PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT (ALLEGIANCE TO AUSTRALIA) BILL 2015 JULY 2015 The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella
More informationQuarterly asylum statistics February 2019
Information Quarterly asylum statistics February 2019 This briefing covers the latest quarterly asylum statistics. For annual and longer term trends see the Refugee Council briefing on asylum trends. APPLICATIONS:
More informationLegislative Council Panel on Security. Unified screening mechanism for non-refoulement claims
LC Paper No. CB(2)1832/14-15(03) For discussion on 7 July 2015 Legislative Council Panel on Security Unified screening mechanism for non-refoulement claims PURPOSE This paper briefs Members on the latest
More informationUNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE Summary Report
UNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE 2011 Summary Report These notes are a summary of issues discussed and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNHCR, IDC or
More informationIMMIGRATION & ASYLUM ACCREDITATION SCHEME
IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM ACCREDITATION SCHEME LEVEL 1 PROBATIONARY ASSESSMENT MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST Page 1 of 11 INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES The time allowed for this examination is 1½ hours. Using a pencil
More informationAustralian Lawyers for Human Rights Refugee Law Kit 2004 (last updated 30 November 2004)
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Refugee Law Kit 2004 (last updated 30 November 2004) CHAPTER 1 - WHO IS A REFUGEE? Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Australian Lawyers for Human
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 info@refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationRethinking Australian Migration
Rethinking Australian Migration Stephen Castles University of Sydney Department of Sociology and Social Policy Challenges to Australian migration model 1. Changes in global and regional migration 2. From
More informationIt is important that you apply for asylum as soon as you enter the UK and that you seek legal advice as soon as possible.
March 2010 English Applying for asylum When you apply for asylum in the United Kingdom (UK), you are asking the authorities (the Home Office) to recognise you as a refugee. The definition of a refugee
More informationPosition Paper on. A problem of social justice
Position Paper on The Plight of Asylum Seekers This paper outlines the concern of the Australian Catholic Social Justice Council (ACSJC) and the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office (ACMRO) over
More informationREPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON REFUGEE STATUS. 4 July 1995 No. I-1004 Vilnius
UNHCR Translation 19/02/2002 REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON REFUGEE STATUS 4 July 1995 No. I-1004 Vilnius New version of the law (News, 2000, No. VIII-1784, 29 06 2000; No. 56-1651 (12 07 2000), enters into
More informationAsylum seekers: 13 things you should know
Asylum seekers: 13 things you should know Frequently Asked Questions Australian Red Cross/Anna Warr Foreword Each year, millions of people are forced to flee their homes to seek protection from persecution
More informationappeal: A written request to a higher court to modify or reverse the judgment of lower level court.
alien: A person who is not a citizen of the country in which he or she lives. A legal alien is someone who lives in a foreign country with the approval of that country. An undocumented, or illegal, alien
More informationCOMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY
AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE AND HUMANITARIAN PROGRAM 2012-13 Community views on current challenges and future directions COMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY We know it is too risky to go [to Australia] by boat. When
More informationSubmission to the Australian Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into
Australia Submission to the Australian Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into Family and Community Services Legislation Amendment (Special Benefit Activity Test) Bill 2002 November
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; the Special
More informationImmigration, Asylum and Refugee ASYLUM REGULATIONS 2008
Legislation made under s. 55. (LN. ) Commencement 2.10.2008 Amending enactments None Relevant current provisions Commencement date EU Legislation/International Agreements involved: Directive 2003/9/EC
More informationDiscussion paper for the Annual Submission on the t
Discussion paper for the Annual Submission on the t 2010-11 11 Humanitarian Program November 2009 This discussion paper aims to provide an overview of some of the new and emerging settlement and refugee
More informationUntil now, no NGO or UN agencies have been granted access to monitor the deportees back in Laos.
Joint Statement on the Principle of Non-Refoulement and the Recent Forced Deportations of the Uighurs from Cambodia and the Lao Hmong from Thailand (Released: 14 January 2010) We, the undersigned, condemn
More informationSUBMISSION ON FAMILY UNITY AND REFUGEE PROTECTION
SUBMISSION ON FAMILY UNITY AND REFUGEE PROTECTION 1. Introduction The applicability of the principle of family unity under the Refugee Convention is a complicated and contested area, partly because the
More informationImmigration Regulations 2014
REPUBLIC OF NAURU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY EXTRAORDINARY G.N.No. 66 / 2014 Immigration Regulations 2014 SL No. 2 of 2014 Table of Provisions PART 1 PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 3 1 Short title...
More informationREFUGEE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
REFUGEE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What are the main reasons that people become refugees, and what other reasons drive people from their homes and across borders? There are many reasons a person may
More information2014 Migration Update Report
2014 Migration Update Report by Graeme Hugo ARC Australian Professorial Fellow and Professor of Geography, The University of Adelaide Presentation to 2014 Migration Update Conference, Adelaide 11 th September,
More informationSUBMISSION ON THE MANAGING AUSTRALIA S MIGRANT INTAKE DISCUSSION PAPER
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS SUBMISSION ON THE MANAGING AUSTRALIA S MIGRANT INTAKE DISCUSSION PAPER The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, people seeking asylum
More informationSettlement policies: Where to from here?
NATIONAL SETTLEMENT POLICY NETWORK (SPN) BACKGROUND PAPER Wednesday, 2 nd October 2013 Settlement policies: Where to from here? Advocacy priorities for the settlement sector under a new Government INTRODUCTION
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 rcoa@cia.com.au www.refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationANNEX A OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES TO SUPPORT TRANSFERS AND RESETTLEMENT
ANNEX A OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES TO SUPPORT TRANSFERS AND RESETTLEMENT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS NO ITEM PAGE NUMBER 1.0 TRANSFER PROCESS FROM AUSTRALIA TO MALAYSIA 1.1 IN AUSTRALIA 1.1.1 INITIAL HANDLING IN AUSTRALIA
More informationMIGRANTS IN CRISIS IN TRANSIT: 2015 NGO PRACTITIONER SURVEY RESULTS NGO Committee on Migration. I. Introduction
MIGRANTS IN CRISIS IN TRANSIT: 2015 NGO PRACTITIONER SURVEY RESULTS NGO Committee on Migration I. Introduction Disturbed by the ever-growing number of migrants in crisis in transit worldwide, the NGO Committee
More informationWe hope this paper will be a useful contribution to the Committee s inquiry into the extent of income inequality in Australia.
22 August 2014 ATTN: Senate Community Affairs References Committee Please find attached a discussion paper produced by the Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA), outlining concerns relating to the likely
More informationResettlement of Guantanamo Bay Detainees: Questions and Answers February 2009
Resettlement of Guantanamo Bay Detainees: Questions and Answers February 2009 The Issue... 2 What can European and other countries such as Canada do for Guantanamo detainees who cannot be returned to their
More informationEthical Reflections on a Proposed Law: Australia as an Accessory to Assault through Migration Legislation Amendment Bill 1995 (No.
Opinion Bioethics Research Notes 7(1): March 1995 Ethical Reflections on a Proposed Law: Australia as an Accessory to Assault through Migration Legislation Amendment Bill 1995 (No. 4) By Anthony Krohn
More informationQuarterly asylum statistics August 2017
Information Quarterly asylum statistics August 2017 This briefing covers the latest quarterly asylum statistics. For annual and longer term trends see the Refugee Council briefing on asylum trends. APPLICATIONS:
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS INQUIRY INTO THE HUMAN RIGHTS (PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY) BILL
SUBMISSION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS INQUIRY INTO THE HUMAN RIGHTS (PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY) BILL The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body
More informationALRC s Traditional Rights and Freedoms Report: Implications for Australian Migration Laws. Khanh Hoang. Introduction. Rights and Freedoms in Context
ALRC s Traditional Rights and Freedoms Report: Implications for Australian Migration Laws Khanh Hoang Introduction On 2 March 2016, the Australian Law Reform Commission released its final report, Traditional
More informationQuarterly asylum statistics November 2018
Information Quarterly asylum statistics November 2018 This briefing covers the latest quarterly asylum statistics. For annual and longer term trends see the Refugee Council briefing on asylum trends. APPLICATIONS:
More informationCOMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POSITIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS IN AN IRREGULAR SITUATION
Strasbourg, 24 June 2010 CommDH/PositionPaper(2010)5 COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS POSITIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS IN AN IRREGULAR SITUATION This is a collection of Positions on the rights of migrants
More informationRoundtable Agenda Sign in/registration Introductions Presentation on immigration issues Roundtable discussion (concerns and issues from the community)
Roundtable Agenda Sign in/registration Introductions Presentation on immigration issues Roundtable discussion (concerns and issues from the community) o Talk about what immigration means to your community.
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, August 2017
Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 22 September 2017 A/HRC/WGAD/2017/42 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary
More informationApplication for an Offshore Humanitarian Visa Refugee and Humanitarian (Class XB) visa
Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs Application for an Offshore Humanitarian Visa Refugee and Humanitarian (Class XB) visa Form 842 Who should use this form? You should use
More informationQuarterly asylum statistics December 2016
Information Quarterly asylum statistics December 2016 This briefing covers the latest quarterly asylum statistics. For annual and longer term trends see the Refugee Council briefing on asylum trends. APPLICATIONS:
More informationAUSTRALIA S ASYLUM POLICIES
AUSTRALIA S ASYLUM POLICIES What s happening and how do we respond? Paul Power CEO, Refugee Council of Australia 16 March 2014 Global displacement today Photo: UNHCR 46 million people forcibly displaced
More informationMIGRATION AND MARITIME POWERS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (RESOLVING THE ASYLUM LEGACY CASELOAD) ACT 2014: WHAT IT MEANS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS
MIGRATION AND MARITIME POWERS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (RESOLVING THE ASYLUM LEGACY CASELOAD) ACT 2014: WHAT IT MEANS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS The Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving
More informationRecommendations regarding the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
Recommendations regarding the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings Submitted by Women s Rights Division, Human Rights Watch Trafficking in persons is a grave
More informationEast Asia and the Pacific
Major developments Australia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Democratic People's Republic of Korea Fiji Indonesia Japan Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Mongolia Nauru New Zealand Papua New Guinea
More informationAustralian Refugee Rights Alliance No Compromise on Human Rights. Refugees and The Human Rights Council THE HUMAN FACE OF AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE POLICY
Australian Refugee Rights Alliance No Compromise on Human Rights Refugees and The Human Rights Council THE HUMAN FACE OF AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE POLICY Australian Refugee Rights Alliance Aileen Crowe Refugees
More informationUnderstanding the issues most important to refugee and asylum seeker youth in the Asia Pacific region
Understanding the issues most important to refugee and asylum seeker youth in the Asia Pacific region June 2016 This briefing paper has been prepared by the Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN),
More informationQuarterly asylum statistics November 2017
Information Quarterly asylum statistics November 2017 This briefing covers the latest quarterly asylum statistics. For annual and longer term trends see the Refugee Council briefing on asylum trends. APPLICATIONS:
More informationEast Asia and the Pacific
East Asia and the Pacific Major Developments Australia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Democratic People s Republic of Korea East Timor Fiji Indonesia Japan Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Mongolia
More informationMODEL RESARCH ASSIGNMENT
MODEL RESARCH ASSIGNMENT LAWSKOOL PTY LTD Do DIMIA s detention guidelines pay sufficient homage to the best interests of the child as espoused by international law? lawskool.com.au Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION
SECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION In the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, States have agreed to consider reviewing
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 info@refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationGuide on. a Refugee Law Clinic
1 Guide on Establishing a Refugee Law Clinic 2014 This document aims to provide support and practical ideas to universities, teachers, lawyers, NGOs, students and anyone else interested in establishing
More informationBangladesh Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Indonesia Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam
Bangladesh Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Indonesia Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam 254 UNHCR Global Report 2011 to survivors of Cyclone
More informationEast Asia and the Pacific
Australia Cambodia China Democratic People s Republic of Korea Indonesia Japan Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar New Zealand Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Singapore
More informationUNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Submission for the Democratic People s Republic of Korea (NORTH KOREA)
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW Submission for the Democratic People s Republic of Korea (NORTH KOREA) Submitting Organisations: Life Funds for North Korean
More informationreport refugee council of australia BARRIERS TO EDUCATION December 2015 Asher Hirsch Policy Officer
report December 2015 BARRIERS TO EDUCATION FOR PEOPLE SEEKING ASYLUM AND REFUGEES ON TEMPORARY VISAS Asher Hirsch Policy Officer Contents Executive Summary 3 Statistics 4 Ineligibility for higher education
More informationAUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION 8 November 2013
AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION 8 November 2013 ABN 47 996 232 602 Level 3, 175 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5218, Sydney
More informationAUSCO Exchange Program 2010 Expressions of Interest
AUSCO Exchange Program 2010 Expressions of Interest The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is seeking Expressions of Interest from settlement service agencies in Australia to participate in the AUSCO
More informationStates Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder
States Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder March 1, 2011 According to news reports, more than 140,000 refugees have fled Libya in the wake of ongoing turmoil, a number that is expected
More informationPart II ONSHORE REFUGEE PROGRAM. Section 1 CRITERIA. Section 2 UNITED NATIONS DEFINITION
Part II ONSHORE REFUGEE PROGRAM Section 1 CRITERIA Section 2 UNITED NATIONS DEFINITION Section 3 KEY CONCEPTS Persecution Well-Founded Fear Convention Reasons Section 4 LIMITATIONS OF APPLYING FOR REFUGEE
More information20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH
POLICY A FAIR GO FOR ALL 20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. Australia s policies towards asylum seekers and refugees should, at all times, reflect respect
More informationCastan Centre for Human Rights Law. Monash University. Melbourne. Submission to the. Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Monash University Melbourne Submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character
More informationIMMIGRATION DETENTION IN NORTHERN IRELAND: 2005 REPORT
IMMIGRATION DETENTION IN NORTHERN IRELAND: 2005 REPORT Refugee Action Group Introduction This report is a statistical summary of the situation facing detained asylum seekers and other immigrants in Northern
More informationForum on the Settlement of Syrian and Iraqi Refugees. Summary Report
Forum on the Settlement of Syrian and Iraqi Refugees Summary Report April 2016 INTRODUCTION In September 2015, the Commonwealth Government announced that it would take in 12,000 Syrian and Iraqi humanitarian
More informationJames C Hathaway, The Rights of Refugees under lnternational Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
James C Hathaway, The Rights of Refugees under lnternational Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Professor James C. Hathaway is recognised as one of the world's leading refugee law scholars. His text
More informationHumanitarian Youth Arrivals to NSW in Fact Sheet
Humanitarian Youth Arrivals to NSW in 2012 1 Humanitarian Youth Arrivals to NSW in 2012 Introduction The information presented in this report1 is derived from statistics collated by the Department of
More informationREFUGEE CLAIMANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA
REFUGEE CLAIMANTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA // FAQs October 2018 bcrefugeehub.ca refugeehub@issbc.org @bcrefugeehub 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 // Making A Refugee Claim... 3 1. Who can make a claim for refugee
More informationThe breakdown of negotiations between the Government
Australia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Japan Malaysia Mongolia New Zealand Papua New Guinea Republic of Korea Singapore South Pacific Thailand The Philippines Timor-Leste Viet Nam Major developments
More informationRefugee Law In Hong Kong
Refugee Law In Hong Kong 1. International Refugee Law Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Geneva Convention as amended by the 1967 Protocol defines a refugee as any person who: owing to a well-founded fear of being
More information2013 FEDERAL ELECTION: REFUGEE POLICIES OF LABOR, LIBERAL-NATIONAL COALITION AND THE GREENS
2013 FEDERAL ELECTION: REFUGEE POLICIES OF LABOR, LIBERAL-NATIONAL COALITION AND THE GREENS This Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) summary explains the 2013 Federal election policies on refugee issues
More informationCOUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN. Countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the South Pacific
COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN Countries: Australia, New Zealand, and the South Pacific Planning Year: 2002 Executive Summary (a) Context and Beneficiary Populations The Regional Office in Canberra has responsibility
More informationSTAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) NATIONAL POLICE CHECKING SERVICE (NPCS) APPLICATION/CONSENT FORM
STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE (WHEN COMPLETED) SECTION 1: PERSONAL INFORMATION - Use BLOCK LETTERS and black ink to complete this form. Mark check boxes with an (X) Given Middle Surname Gender: gfedc Male gfedc
More information4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As Thailand continues in its endeavour to strike the right balance between protecting vulnerable migrants and effectively controlling its porous borders, this report
More informationCHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT
REFUGEES [CAP. 420. 1 CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT AN ACT to make provisions relating to and establishing procedures with regard to refugees and asylum seekers. ACT XX of 2000. 1st October, 2001 PART I General
More informationBCH Services Guide - Refugee & Immigration Support
BCH Services Guide - Refugee & Immigration Support Ballarat Community Health provides a range of refugee and settlement services including: Paediatric Immigrant Health Clinic Refugee Health Nurse Settlement
More informationHumanitarian Youth Arrivals to Australia July 2013 June 2014
Information Sheet Humanitarian Youth Arrivals to Australia July 213 June 214 Introduction 1.1 The MYAN The Multicultural Youth Advocacy Network (MYAN) is the nationally recognised policy and advocacy body
More informationThe law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on refugees (with amendments and additions as of )
Unofficial translation The law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on refugees (with amendments and additions as of 11.04.2014) On the changes to the current Code, see: Law of the RK of 03.07.14 227 V (coming
More informationApplication for an Authority to Drive Taxi-Cab or Private Hire Vehicle (Issued under the Passenger Transport Act 1990)
Application for an Authority to Drive Taxi-Cab or Private Hire Vehicle (Issued under the Passenger Transport Act 1990) NSW Transport and Infrastructure collects and holds your personal information for
More informationThird Country Refugee Resettlement Information Refugees from Bhutan living in Nepal
Third Country Refugee Resettlement Information Refugees from Bhutan living in Nepal Third Country Refugee Resettlement Information This provides basic information about resettlement in answer to questions
More informationCOMMON LEGAL QUESTIONS ON IMMIGRATION
COMMON LEGAL QUESTIONS ON IMMIGRATION Who are illegal migrants? Atty. Imelda Argel, BA(Hons), LLB(UP), SAB(NSW), LLM(Syd) Solicitor of the State of New South Wales Solicitor of the High Court of Australia
More informationDegrading strip search procedures by law enforcement agencies
Hong Kong Human Rights Commission Society for Community Organization Degrading strip search procedures by law enforcement agencies Report to the United Nations Committee Against Torture on the Second Report
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT IMMIGRATION ACT: MONITORING AND DETENTION
REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT IMMIGRATION ACT: MONITORING AND DETENTION Statement of the Public Policy Objective To develop a modern monitoring and detention system that manages risk while ensuring the rights
More informationProposed reforms to UK asylum policy
10 Oxfam Briefing Paper Proposed reforms to UK asylum policy Oxfam s response A description of the reforms outlined in the speech to the House of Commons by the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
More informationWorld In Motion: A Legal Look at Refugee Crises in Jessica M. Therkelsen, Esq. Global Policy Director, Asylum Access AsylumAccess.
World In Motion: A Legal Look at Refugee Crises in 2016 Jessica M. Therkelsen, Esq. Global Policy Director, Asylum Access AsylumAccess.org 20 million people 20 years in exile Less than 1% leave their region
More informationPrinciples for a UK Resettlement Programme
Principles for a UK Resettlement Programme This paper describes the background to the current debate around the idea of refugee resettlement to the UK sparked off by recent government announcements and
More informationSubject: Green Paper on the future Common European Asylum System
HELLENIC REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR GREEK POLICE HEADQUARTERS SECURITY AND ORDER BRANCH DIRECTORATE FOR FOREIGNERS UNIT 3 P. Κanellopoulou 4-101 77 ΑTHENS Tel.: 210 6919069-Fax: 210 6990827 Contact:
More informationAsylum Seeker information sheet for Victorian health services
Asylum Seeker health Information sheet 1 Asylum Seeker information sheet for Victorian health services This information sheet aims to provide clarity to health service staff in Victoria on asylum seekers
More informationEUROPEAN MIGRATION NETWORK ANNUAL REPORT ON STATISTICS ON MIGRATION, ASYLUM AND RETURN: IRELAND 2004 EMMA QUINN
EUROPEAN MIGRATION NETWORK ANNUAL REPORT ON STATISTICS ON MIGRATION, ASYLUM AND RETURN: IRELAND 2004 EMMA QUINN Research Study Financed by European Commission Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security
More informationList of issues in relation to the initial report of Belize*
Advance unedited version Distr.: General 10 April 2018 Original: English English, French and Spanish only Human Rights Committee List of issues in relation to the initial report of Belize* Constitutional
More informationBail for Immigration Detainees: Submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee s Inquiry on Home Office delivery of Brexit: Immigration
November 2017 Bail for Immigration Detainees: Submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee s Inquiry on Home Office delivery of Brexit: Immigration 1. Bail for Immigration Detainees is an independent
More informationInformation from Bail for Immigration Detainees: Families separated by immigration detention August 2010
Information from Bail for Immigration Detainees: Families separated by immigration detention August 2010 From November 2008 to August 2010, Bail for Immigration Detainee s (BID s) family team worked with
More informationYoung people from migrant and refugee backgrounds
National Youth Settlement Framework: Young people from migrant and refugee backgrounds Introduction This resource has been developed as a supplement to the MYAN Australia s National Youth Settlement Framework
More informationSUBMISSION FROM BAIL FOR IMMIGRATION DETAINEES (BID) FOR THE CONSULTATION ON CODES OF PRACTICE FOR CONDITIONAL CAUTIONS
28 Commercial Street, London E1 6LS Tel: 020 7247 3590 Fax: 020 7426 0335 Email: enquiries@biduk.org www.biduk.org Winner of the JUSTICE Human Rights Award 2010 Conditional Cautions Code of Practice Ministry
More informationBackground Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces
Background Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces January 29, 2002 Introduction 1. International Law and the Treatment of Prisoners in an Armed Conflict 2. Types of Prisoners under
More information