Compensating indigenous Australian 'losers': a community-oriented approach from the Aboriginal social policy arena
|
|
- Solomon Rose
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 per
2 Compensating indigenous Australian 'losers': a community-oriented approach from the Aboriginal social policy arena J.C. Altman and D.E. Smith No.47/1993 ISSN ISBN
3 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established in March 1990 under an agreement between the Australian National University and the Commonwealth of Australia (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission). CAEPR operates as an independent research unit within the University's Faculty of Arts. CAEPR's principal objectives are to undertake research to: investigate the stimulation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander economic development and issues relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander employment and unemployment; identify and analyse the factors affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation in the labour force; and assist in the development of government strategies aimed at raising the level of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation in the labour market. The Director of the Centre is responsible to the Vice-Chancellor of the Australian National University and receives assistance in formulating the Centre's research agenda from an Advisory Committee consisting of five senior academics nominated by the Vice-Chancellor and four representatives nominated by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, the Department of Employment, Education and Training and the Department of Social Security. CAEPR DISCUSSION PAPERS are intended as a forum for the dissemination of refereed papers on research that falls within the CAEPR ambit. These papers are produced for discussion and comment within the research community and Aboriginal affairs policy arena. Many are subsequently published in academic journals. Copies of discussion papers can be purchased from Reply Paid 440, ANUTECH Pty Ltd, Canberra ACT Ph (06) Fax (06) As with all CAEPR publications, the views expressed in this DISCUSSION PAPER are those of the author(s) and do not reflect an official CAEPR position. Jon Altman Director, CAEPR Australian NationalUniversity
4 ABSTRACT The extent to which social policy should foster economic adaptation and compensate the losers' from economic forces is of growing concern to policy makers in the 1990s. From an Aboriginal policy perspective this concern is familiar. The recent endemic levels of unemployment experienced by the non-aboriginal population have been a long-term experience for indigenous Australians. The paper explores an approach from the Aboriginal affairs social policy arena - the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme - and considers both its ability to compensate disadvantaged indigenous Australians and its applicability in the wider community. The concept of indigenous losers' is critically examined in the light of the considerable cultural, economic and geographic variation within the Aboriginal population itself. The current level of indigenous disadvantage also reflects complex historical processes. The CDEP scheme is a community-oriented approach which offers a potentially radical economic adaptation; the most significant being the 'Aboriginalisation 1 of work and a high degree of local control over setting employment outcomes and work schedules. However, the paper argues that the longer-term employment and income improvement outcomes from the scheme are far from clear. The CDEP scheme does not appear to be particularly effective in reducing poverty and in some regions it may perpetuate an employment enclave for the disadvantaged. Finally, it remains unclear whether the scheme has the capacity to compensate especially disadvantaged individuals at the community level, or to move unemployed indigenous Australians towards equality with other Australians. The scheme appears to suit the particular circumstances of many indigenous Australians, but any moves to introduce the scheme more widely would need to proceed cautiously. Acknowledgments An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research seminar in June Input provided at this seminar resulted in its considerable refocus. Thanks to Anne Daly, John Taylor, Linda Roach, Konstantin Probst, Nicky Lumb and Belinda Lim for comments and editorial assistance. A number of participants at the National Social Policy Conference provided additional input when the paper was formally delivered in July Jon Altman is Director and Diane Smith is Research Fellow, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Faculty of Arts, Australian National University, Canberra.
5 Foreword In response to a call for papers for the 1993 National Social Policy Conference with the theme 'Theory and Practice in Australian Social Policy: Rethinking the Fundamentals', academics at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, submitted three inter-related abstracts with the following titles: i ii iii 'Indigenous Australians and social policy: rethinking the fundamentals' (J.C. Altman and W.G. Sanders); 'The role of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission in social policy towards indigenous Australians' (J.C. Altman and D.E. Smith); and 'Work and welfare for indigenous Australians' (A.E. Daly and A.E. Hawke). It was anticipated that all three papers would be earmarked for a special session on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander issues convened in recognition of the 1993 United Nations International Year of the World's Indigenous People. However, the conference organisers only slotted the first proposal into this session; the second was included in the stream 'Social Policy and the Economy', and the third in the stream 'Work and Welfare'. The section 'Social Policy and the Economy' sought papers that examined how social policy should be aimed at fostering economic adaptation and the extent to which it should be concerned with compensating the 'losers' from market forces. To streamline our proposed paper to the session theme, Diane Smith and I changed its title to 'Compensating indigenous Australian 'losers': a community oriented approach from the Aboriginal social policy arena' and focused the paper's content primarily on the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme. A version of this paper has been submitted for inclusion in the conference proceedings, but it is also published as a CAEPR discussion paper to make it available immediately to an audience focusing on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social policy. Jon Altman Series Editor September 1993
6 How should social policy foster economic adaptation, and to what extent should it be concerned with compensating the losers' from market forces? These questions are of growing concern to policy makers in the 1990s. From an Aboriginal policy perspective, this concern is familiar. The recent endemic levels of unemployment experienced by the non-aboriginal population have been a long-term experience for indigenous Australians. The key aim of this paper is to explore an approach from the Aboriginal affairs social policy arena and consider both its ability to compensate indigenous Australian losers and, more speculatively, its potentially wider applicability to all Australian losers. The approach examined is encompassed in the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme, a community-oriented program sometimes referred to as a 'work-for-the dole' scheme. This depiction originates from the fact that under the CDEP scheme communities receive a block grant roughly equivalent to the welfare entitlements of community members. However, additional payments in the form of on-costs and resources for the purchase of capital equipment are also provided. Currently, nearly 22,000 indigenous Australians residing at over 200 localities participate in the scheme. Participation almost invariably means part-time employment, as the resources available to each participating community do not allow the creation of full-time jobs. In the financial year, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) allocated some $235 million to the scheme, with about 75 per cent of this amount consisting of notional offsets against the welfare entitlements of participants. The novel feature of the CDEP scheme is that it is a community-focused labour market program which has no equivalent in mainstream social policy. An examination of the scheme provides an opportunity to highlight, in an exploratory manner, some of the difficulties that mainstream policy might experience in any attempts to centrally target policies and programs at economic losers, be they the long-term unemployed or those in regions that have excessively borne the brunt of the structural adjustments associated with the current recession. The potential applicability of the CDEP scheme is of special interest in the aftermath of two recent policy initiatives: a renewed federal concern with regional adjustment and regional development. 1 Defining indigenous 'losers' Defining losers is never easy, especially with a regionally dispersed and culturally heterogeneous population. In this paper, we define indigenous losers as the unemployed, especially the long-term unemployed (that is, those unemployed for 12 months or over). Some recent data on indigenous Australians in this category for the period is provided by Junankar and Kapuscinski (1991: 39) and more recently by Daly and Hawke (1993).
7 Both demonstrate that long-term unemployment is significantly higher for indigenous Australians than for the rest of the population. However, a focus on the long-term unemployed excludes participants in the CDEP scheme, many of whom would have been classified as being long-term unemployed if it were not for part-time employment opportunities created by the scheme. Table 1. Unemployment rates and mean individual incomes of the indigenous and total populations, Unemployment rate Indigenous Australians Total population Ratio Aboriginal to total population Mean individual income Indigenous Australians na $3,276 $4,634 $8,017 $11,491 Total population na $5,025 $8,130 $12,251 $17,614 Ratio indigenous to total population na Source: Tesfaghiorghis and Altman (1991); 1991 Census data. There are some important similarities and differences between the experiences of Australians in general during the past two years and the experiences of indigenous Australians over the past twenty years. This is the case especially for Australians in those rural and remote regions who have experienced regional recession. Indeed, it could be argued that the entire Aboriginal affairs policy debate over the last two decades has focused on Aboriginal people as losers, if not from market forces then certainly from colonialism (in settled regions) and as a result of their residence beyond the economic frontier (in the most remote parts). Perhaps the clearest and most cogent argument that presented Aboriginal people, as a group, as losers was contained in the Aboriginal Employment Development Policy Statement (Australian Government 1987) which defined Aboriginal socioeconomic disadvantage in terms of employment, income and welfare dependency. Table 1 clearly demonstrates that as a racially-defined group indigenous Australians are economically disadvantaged when compared to the total population. It is interesting to note that while trends over time are not the concern of this paper, there
8 has been some broad convergence in indigenous and total Australian unemployment rates; the same has not occurred with mean individual income. Aboriginal economic disadvantage is a product of historical, locational, demographic and cultural factors, but it is also due to structural change that has perhaps been ameliorated and masked by the nature and extent of government intervention. A recent analysis of the inter-relationship between macroeconomic factors and the employment status of indigenous Australians (Altman and Daly 1992a; Taylor 1992) indicates structural factors at work: there are some sectors of the economy, like agriculture, where Aboriginal employment has actually declined in absolute terms between 1971 and 1986 despite a doubling of the population. Caveat The above presentation of indigenous Australians as 'losers' in socioeconomic terms has gained considerable currency in the aftermath of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. However, this picture needs to be heavily qualified on two counts. First, disadvantaged Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people cannot be categorised as a homogeneous indigenous underclass. The level of current disadvantage is not simply the product of recent recessionary processes which are further restricting an already tenuous position in the labour force. Current levels of indigenous disadvantage reflect the historical process of their marginalisation from the mainstream economy. This process took place (and continues to occur) at different times, in a diversity of circumstances and with varied impacts. One of the fundamental divisions highlighted by a number of researchers and made apparent by census data is that between remote and rural Aboriginal communities, and urban and metropolitan areas. This broad division had its intellectual antecedents in the analytical distinction made by Rowley (1971) between colonial and settled Australia. In the former, it is locational disadvantage and cultural difference that marginalise indigenous Australians in mainstream terms, although in some situations land rights and access to subsistence resources reduce the extent of disadvantage (see Altman and Allen 1992). In settled and urban areas, economic disadvantage is a legacy of the colonial encounter and the exclusion of indigenous Australians from citizenship entitlements and the provisions of the welfare state. This broad distinction has decreased significantly with time, owing to migration and especially urbanisation. Nevertheless, analyses of social indicators at the State, section-of-state, and regional levels show a significant degree of variability in the extent of indigenous socioeconomic disadvantage (Tesfaghiorghis 1991, 1992). Second, not all indigenous people are losers in the mainstream market economy and some individuals who may be classified as disadvantaged
9 according to official statistical measures, perceive themselves quite differently. For example, case study evidence reveals that recycling employment and the 'intermittent worker effect' may be active choices for some indigenous people, rather than the product of economic exclusion (Smith 1991). Culturally-determinedchoices to reside in remote locations where the labour market is virtually non-existent and to pursue lifestyles more oriented to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander priorities also have an impact on the extent to which people can choose to participate in mainstream employment. Some make an active choice to participate in the informal economy, with cash income supplements coming from welfare. With these significant cultural qualifications, we focus on disadvantage with respect to those individuals who participate in the mainstream labour force as enumerated by census statistics. The CDEP scheme: a community-oriented approach The CDEP scheme was first established on a pilot basis in 1977 by the Fraser Government. Its early history has been described in some detail by Sanders (1988) and its more recent development, especially after the launch of the Aboriginal Employment Development Policy (AEDP), by Altman and Sanders (1991). Initially the scheme targeted Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in remote regions where very restricted, or non-existent, mainstream labour markets were the norm. The scheme was introduced at a time when the award wage economy and associated rights to unemployment benefits was new to remote Aboriginal communities. While there has been considerable debate in the literature about the exact objectives of the scheme, it is increasingly recognised that it has multiple objectives, including community infrastructure development, income support, employment creation, enterprise development, and social and cultural objectives (see CDEP Working Party 1990; Altman and Sanders 1991; Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 1993). Since the launch of the AEDP in 1987, the scheme has been increasingly regarded as a labour market program under the umbrella of the AEDP. Consequently, it is regarded in policy terms as a potential contributor to the AEDP goals of employment and income equality between indigenous and other Australians by the year While the CDEP scheme is not an ATSIC initiative, it has been expanded and vigorously pursued in the aftermath of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (Commonwealth of Australia 1991) which strongly advocated expansion of the scheme, especially into rural and urban areas that have been disproportionately affected by the recent recession. The CDEP scheme represents a potentially radical economic adaptation in many respects, but carries a burden of great expectations from both government and indigenous Australians. It is ATSIC's largest
10 program, and its expansion in recent years, attesting primarily to its popularity among indigenous Australians, is demonstrated in Table 2. As outlined by ATSIC, the current objectives of the CDEP scheme are to provide employment opportunities for indigenous people in locations where there are limited alternatives, to reduce indigenous dependence on welfare benefits and improve 'elements of their social, cultural or economic life which enhance self-management' (Commonwealth of Australia1992: 59). Certainly the program has wide appeal, especially now that it is not limited to discrete communities, but is also available on a project basis. A total of 200 communities or organisations participated in the scheme in providing employment opportunities for nearly 22,000 people, or nearly 15 per cent of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population of workingage. Table 2. CDEP scheme participants, expenditure and proportion of Aboriginal affairs portfolio expenditure, to Year Participating communities CDEP scheme CDEP as per cent Participants expenditure of Aboriginal affairs (workers) ($ million) portfolio expenditure (est.) ,300 1,300 1,300 1,700 2,900 4,000 6,000 7,600 10,800 13,800 18,266 20,000 22, Source: Altman and Sanders (1991); Economic Initiatives Branch, ATSIC.
11 Table 3. Employment and non-employment income of Aboriginal individuals aged 15 years and over, 1986 and Labour force status Number Mean income Total income ($ million) Per cent of total 1986 Employed (CDEP component) Unemployed NILF Not stated Total 40,642 (4,000) 21,467 54,321 3, ,619 $13,726 ($5,650) $6,883 $4,388 $4,580 $8,015 $ ($22.60) $ $ $14.61 $ (2.4) Employed (CDEP component) Unemployed NILF Not stated Total 54,464 (18,072) 23,014 60,640 1, ,010 $16,757 ($8,123) $8,342 $8,021 $9,564 $11,491 $ ($146.80) $ $ $18.10 $1, (9.1) Source: 1991 and 1986 Census data. Data in brackets are estimates from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA), then ATSIC, administrative data sets reported in Annual Reports. Note that estimated mean income of CDEP participants is notional, assuming no additional non-cdep income. Table 4. Growth in CDEP scheme participation and change in unemployment rates, by State, CDEP participants Unemployment rate 1986 a 1991 a % change % change NSW Vic. NT Qld SA WA Tas. ACT ,405 1,090 1, , ,146 7,010 1,622 3, ve +ve na na Total 5,018 18, a. At 30 June. Source: ATSIC administrative databases on CDEP participants, Economic Initiatives Branch, ATSIC; special tables, Statistics Section, Strategic Development Unit, ATSIC.
12 The scheme's most radical aspect is that it allows for an 'Aboriginalisation' of work: participating communities are able to define the work context, with the result that employment includes clothing manufacture, cabinet making, provision of essential services, market gardening, arts and crafts production, rabbit eradication, emu farming, maintenance of sacred and other sites, firewood collection and canoe building. (A far wider range of activities is outlined by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 1993.) There is a high degree of local control over setting employment outcomes and work schedules. However, this decentralised authority over the management of the scheme has resulted, according to one commentator, in 'senior administrative anxiety' (Rowse 1993: 270). There is a clear tension present in the scheme between local indigenous management and nationallyestablished economic objectives, accountability and program evaluation. Macro-impacts At the same time, longer-term employment and income improvement outcomes from the scheme are far from clear. While expansion of the CDEP scheme certainly provides a means to reduce unemployment rates as officially defined in the five-yearly census, it does not appear to be particularly effective in reducing poverty. Altman and Smith (1993) argue that, in fact, there might be inverse and unintended trade-offs between AEDP goals: in particular, reduced welfare dependency in the current economic climate may hamper the goal of income equality by locking CDEP participants into ongoing low-paid employment in areas where there is little chance of any alternative full-time employment. There is no evidence to suggest that CDEP employment leads to better employment chances outside of the scheme. Rather, it may be that the scheme perpetuates an employment enclave for the disadvantaged. This is demonstrated notionally in Table 3, and more thoroughly by Taylor's (1993) analysis of socioeconomic status by section-of-state in the Northern Territory. Perhaps it is this that is causing 'administrative anxiety', although it may also be of anxiety to policy makers genuinely concerned with the poverty that seems to be perpetuated by the scheme and its vulnerability to adverse commentary from those who believe that Aboriginal economic disadvantage cannot be compensated with specially targeted programs that potentially maintain marginalisation in the longer term (Brunton 1993). The overall impact of the CDEP scheme is demonstrated in simplified aggregate terms in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 shows that growth at the national level in CDEP participants almost matched growth in numbers employed. However, this statement must be heavily qualified, because it is impossible to tell from census data whether CDEP participants are categorised as employed, unemployed or not in the labour force (see Altman and Daly 1992b). It can be safely assumed though that a significant proportion of CDEP scheme participants, especially so-called 'workers' are classified as part-time employed (see Taylor 1993). Tables 3 and 4 together
13 demonstrate that at the State level there is a close correlation between the increase in CDEP participation and a reduction in officially defined unemployment rates. However, it will be necessary to disaggregate to assess the community-based impact of the scheme on employment and income levels. Micro-impacts The macro-impacts of the CDEP scheme must be differentiated from its micro-impacts at the community level. In particular, it remains unclear if the scheme has the capacity to compensate especially disadvantaged individuals at the community level. While there is currently no rigorous research available to address this issue, concern has been raised in the literature that community politics may result in some sectional interests, like women, receiving less than their welfare entitlements under the CDEP scheme mechanism, owing to the devolution of control over resource distribution to community councils (CDEP Working Party 1990; Altman and Sanders 1991). Certainly the scheme's guidelines do not provide specific direction to target those most in need. For example, recent analysis by Taylor (1993) in the Northern Territory raises the possibility that some indigenous Australians who were in mainstream employment may have shifted to part-time CDEP scheme employment. A major problem facing any attempt to assess micro-impacts of the scheme is that quantitativedata are not available: indigenous Australians are not separately identified in the monthly Labour Force Survey, and it is likely that many CDEP participants are not identified in the census as being in part-time employment (see Altman and Daly 1992b; Taylor 1993). Furthermore, such formal surveys would be incapable of capturing the qualitative 'community development' repercussions of the scheme. Detailed case studies are needed. It is clear that the CDEP scheme is the wrong program mechanism if its major economic policy objective is to move individuals off welfare (actual or notional) and into the mainstream labour market. A standard measure used to evaluate the performance of labour market programs is the employment status of individuals after a period of participation (see Daly 1993). In such a context the CDEP scheme has been unsuccessful. This is evidenced by the fact that despite the scheme's operation in some communities since 1977, no community has chosen, or been required, to move off the scheme due to the successful creation of mainstream employment opportunities. Unfortunately, there are no accurate data available on whether individuals at these communities have moved into mainstream jobs. While the census does not allow tracking of individuals over time, administrative data suggest that participant numbers at communities are expanding. The apparent failure of the scheme in 'creating' mainstream employment is hardly surprising given the remoteness of many participating communities from labour markets; and it
14 is not reasonable, perhaps, to expect it to be able to create a mainstream labour market. Nevertheless, the apparent lack of connection between CDEP and the mainstream labour market leaves the scheme vulnerable to the criticism that it constitutes an endless direct job creation program and that it provides no incentive to individual participants to seek full-time employment. Another criterion for evaluating labour market program outcomes is changed income status. The CDEP scheme has some potential to operate as a guaranteed minimum income scheme, and, in such circumstances, to provide an opportunity to supplement incomes (in cash or in kind) beyond the ceilings set by welfare equivalent entitlements. This would occur, for example, in situations where the hours available after completion of CDEP community-oriented work were devoted to artefact manufacture, subsistence activities or commercial 'community' fishing (Altman and Taylor 1989). There is little evidence, however, that the CDEP scheme is facilitating such informal productive activities in situations where they were not already undertaken under a welfare support regime. Indeed, the major identified micro-impacts of the scheme at 21 case study communities visited in association with the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (1993) consultancy were primarily in the areas of essential services and housing. It appears that unlike welfare regimes, the CDEP scheme does provide an organisational umbrella under which 'socially useful' work is undertaken. Even so, this very positive feature of the scheme has potential negative repercussions, linked to substitution, that will be outlined below. CDEP scheme issues There is little doubt that the CDEP scheme has proven popular with many indigenous Australian communities, that it enables a greater degree of local control and management, and has the flexibility to respond to culturallybased priorities and choices. In these aspects it represents an important economic adaptation within the Aboriginal affairs program and policy arena. It has the potential to represent a fundamentally different direction in program strategy if it can survive. This survival will require policy consideration of the following and other issues. To continue, the scheme must demonstrate that it is not locking individual participants into income levels that are little different from welfare entitlements. To ensure this, ATSIC might need to consider modifying the scheme to differentiate those participants who are merely seeking income support from those who are structurally unemployed and seeking an option to increase income by using the scheme as a stepping-stone to mainstream employment, hi some situations, this is linked to the issue of training: to provide effective means to facilitate entry into mainstream employment,
15 10 where it exists, the scheme should be streamlined with training. However, as Kerr (1992: 122) notes, such training has to be vocationally oriented, especially in urban and rural contexts. A second complex issue that needs to be addressed is whether participation in the CDEP scheme is, in fact, employment, usually of a part-time nature, or welfare support. This distinction obviously needs to be reflected in the way CDEP scheme participants are classified in official surveys like the five-yearly census. But it also has ramifications in terms of the entitlements of CDEP scheme participants to full award conditions, an issue raised by the union movement but never actively pursued (Smith 1990; Altman and Hawke 1993). The key issue and challenge for ATSIC in administering the scheme is linked to the vexed problem of substitution. This occurs at a number of levels. The CDEP scheme itself is a form of substitution funding because ATSIC is replacing participants' welfare entitlements with equivalentblock grants paid to participating communities. According to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (1993) one of the most positive features of the scheme is that CDEP workers are involved in the construction and maintenance of community infrastructure and housing. But this too has strong elements of substitution, because it appears that CDEP scheme employment financed by the Federal Government is substituting, at least in part, for normal activities usually financed by State and local governments. A final form of substitution is linked to the growing trend towards regionalism in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander policy. If regions are increasingly compensated by ATSIC on the basis of socioeconomic disadvantage, then it will be important to clarify the definition of CDEP participation in official statistics. If such participation is defined as employment, then any socioeconomic status index incorporating employment rates is likely to understate the extent of real disadvantage.this might jeopardise full access by CDEP scheme communities to their equitable entitlement to discretionary resources. It must be emphasised that each of these are broad policy issues, and it remains unclear to what extent they are of significant concern to the communities participating in the scheme. Wider implications The CDEP scheme raises some interesting issues of immediate wider social policy importance as the Keating Government is presently focusing on long-term unemployment, regional disadvantage and changing Australian attitudes to work. In particular, in the aftermath of the Prime Minister's statement of May 1993 and the establishment of an expert
16 committee with terms of reference to produce a report on the labour market by 31 December 1993, there will be a need to seriously consider innovative approaches like the CDEP scheme for the wider Australian community. This is partly because the scheme is often presented as a work-for-the-dole scheme and this has intuitive appeal to those who believe that the longterm unemployed could be usefully engaged in community-oriented work of public benefit. Also, it is a scheme whose rapid growth implies success and popularity. Mainstream economics is not without its debate about the merits of such schemes. On the one hand, it is recognised that direct job creation schemes are the most expensive and least effective options available to create long-term employment (Stretton and Chapman 1990). On the other, some are calling for a revamping of local employment initiatives, utilised in the 1980s as a means to create employment in the 1990s (Hodgkinson and Kelly 1993). An initial issue that would arise in the wider context is how communities might be chosen for participation in the scheme. To date, CDEP scheme entry has been ad hoc; it is questionable if such an approach would be acceptable in the wider community. It is unclear on what basis communities could be targeted for inclusion. In the early years of the CDEP scheme, priority was given to remote and discrete Aboriginal communities where employment opportunities were extremely circumscribed. To identify discrete communities without using Aboriginality as a criterion might be a great deal more complex, despite the availability of far better information on the long-term unemployed for all Australians. A community basis for introducing the scheme could exist in some unusual circumstances, like rural land-sharing communities or communes (Sommerlad and Altaian 1986). The alternative of establishing block-grant linked employment programs on a project basis (as is occurring in some urban Aboriginal situations) may be more acceptable in the wider community. Even then, one might wonder whether communitybased or project-based programs are an effective means to target individual losers (see Hodgkinson and Kelly 1993). Some fundamental differences exist between indigenous Australian communities participating in the scheme and mainstream society. First, in general, the scheme has been introduced to remote Aboriginal communities with no formal employment options. Second, the substitution occurring under the CDEP scheme is accepted, and even welcomed, because of the significant infrastructural shortfall at these communities. Such substitution might not be tolerated in the wider community. Finally, it seems unlikely that the union movement would accept non-award conditions frequently associated with the CDEP scheme if it were more widely applied (Altman andhawke 1993). 11
17 12 Conclusion To what extent has Aboriginal affairs policy developed an effective means to compensate indigenous losers from market forces? At an institutional level, it appears that ATSIC has a community-oriented program, the CDEP scheme, that has sufficient flexibility to target particular sectional groups of the long-term unemployed. However, as argued above, there are a number of factors that circumscribe the potential of the scheme to move structurally unemployed indigenous Australians towards economic equality with other Australians. While the CDEP scheme is significant (both in terms of resources and number of participants), its expansion appears limited by budgetary ceilings despite its notional offsets against individual welfare entitlements. This link has had positive spin-offs: it has been responsible in large part for the rapid expansion of the scheme in the late 1980s. But this has also created pitfalls: in particular, welfare-linked fiscal ceilings limit the ability of participants to break out of poverty. While the CDEP scheme represents an economic adaptation that may appease policy makers concerned with high levels of officially-defined unemployment, and is supported by a number of participating communities welcoming greater local control, there is limited evidence to date that the scheme alleviates poverty, as measured by the census, or that it results in the shift of indigenous Australians into employment in the mainstream labour market. In short, it is unclear if disadvantaged individuals are better looked after or targeted under ATSIC's community-focused compensation approach than under the mainstream welfare net. The scheme appears to suit the particular circumstances of many indigenous Australians, but any moves to introduce the scheme more widely would need to proceed cautiously. Note 1. As spelt out in a speech by the Minister for Industry, Technology and Regional Development, the Hon. Alan Griffith, to the Committee for the Economic Development of Australia, titled 'Economic Change and Regional Development', (4 April 1993), and on long-term unemployment, as outlined in a speech by the Hon Paul Keating, Prime Minister, to the Economic Planning Advisory Council on 28 May References Altman, J.C. and Allen, L.M 'Indigenous participation in the informal economy: statistical and policy implications', in J.C. Altman (ed.) A National Survey of Indigenous Australians: Options and Implications, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra.
18 13 Altman, J.C. and Daly, A.E. 1992a. 'Do fluctuations in the Australian macroeconomy influence Aboriginal employment status?', Economic Papers, 11 (4): Altman, J.C. and Daly, A.E. 1992b. The CDEP scheme: a census-based analysis of the labour market status of participants in 1986', Economic Paperss, 11 (4): Altman, J.C. and Hawke, A.E 'Indigenous Australians and the labour market: issues for the union movement in the 1990s', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 45, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Altman, J.C. and Sanders, W The CDEP scheme: administrative and policy issues', Australian Journal of Public Administration, 50 (4): Altman, J.C. and Smith, D.E 'The welfare dependence of Aboriginal Australians: policy implications', Social Security Journal, March 1993: Altman, J.C. and Taylor, L The Economic Viability of Aboriginal Outstations and Homelands, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Australian Government The Aboriginal Employment Development Policy Statement, Policy Paper No. 1, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Brunton, R Black Suffering, White Guilt? Aboriginal Disadvantage and the Royal Commission into Deaths in Custody, Institute of Public Affairs, Melbourne. CDEP Working Party Community Development Employment Projects: Review of Funding, unpublished report, Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Canberra. Commonwealth of Australia The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, National Report, vols 1-4, (Commissioner E. Johnston), Australian Government PublishingService, Canberra. Commonwealth of Australia Program Performance Statements , Employment, Education and Training Portfolio (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission), Budget Related Paper No. 9.5B, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Daly, A.E The evaluation of labour market programs: some issues for Aboriginal policy formulation from experience in the United States', Labour Economics and Productivity, 5(1): Daly, A.E. and Hawke, A.E 'Work and welfare for indigenous Australians', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 48, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu No Reverse Gear: A National Review of the Community Development Employment Projects Scheme, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, Canberra. Hodgkinson, A. and Kelly, D 'Local employment initiatives as a response to unemployment in the 1990s', in A. Hodgkinson, D. Kelly and N. Verucci (eds) Responding to Unemployment: Perspectives and Strategies, Labour Market Analysis Program, Department of Economics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.
19 14 Junankar, P.N. and Kapuscinski, C.A 'Aboriginal employment and unemployment: an overview', Economic Papers, 10 (4): Kerr, D. (Chairman) Mainly Urban: Report of the Inquiry into the Needs of Urban Dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Rowley, C.D The Remote Aborigines, Australian National University Press, Canberra. Rowse, T 'Rethinking Aboriginal 'resistance': the Community Development Employment Program (CDEP)', Oceania, 63 (3): Sanders, W The CDEP scheme: bureaucratic politics, remote community politics and the development of an Aboriginal 'workfare' program in times of rising unemployment', Politics, 32 (1): Smith, D.E 'Aboriginal unemployment statistics: policy implications of the divergence between official and case study data', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 13, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Smith, M 'Employment, training, unions and awards', unpublished paper presented at the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Biennial Conference - Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Futures, James Cook University, Townsville, July Sommerlad, E.A. and Altman, J.C 'Alternative rural communities: a solution to urban unemployment?', Australian Journal of Social Issues, 21 (1): Stretton, A. and Chapman, BJ 'An analysis of Australian labour market programs', CEPR Discussion Paper No. 247, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Taylor, J 'Occupational segregation: a comparison between employed Aborigines, Torres Strait Islanders and other Australians', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 33, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Taylor, J 'Aboriginal socioeconomic change in the Northern Territory, ', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 40, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University,Canberra. Tesfaghiorghis, H 'Geographic variations in the socioeconomic status of Aboriginal people: a preliminary investigation', CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 2, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra. Tesfaghiorghis, H 'Aboriginal economic status by ATSIC regions: analyses of 1986 Census data', in P. Saunders and D. Encel (eds) Social Policy in Australia: Options for the 1990s, vol. 2, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Tesfaghiorghis, H. and Altman, J.C 'Aboriginal socioeconomic status: are there any evident changes?, CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 3, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Canberra.
20 RECENT CENTRE FOR ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (CAEPR) DISCUSSION PAPERS 19/1992 Estimating the reliance of Aboriginal Australians on welfare: some policy implications, J.C. Altman and D.E. Smith. 20/1992 Establishing trends in ATSIC regional council populations using census data: a cautionary note, J.C. Altman and K.H.W. Gaminiratne. 21/1992 Do fluctuations in the Australian macroeconomy influence Aboriginal employment status?, J.C. Altman and A.E. Daly. 22/1992 Industry segregation among employed Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, J. Taylor. 23/1992 The evaluation of labour market programs: some issues for Aboriginal policy formulation from experience in the United States, A.E. Daly. 24/1992 First counts, 1991 Census: a comment on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population growth, K.H.W. Gaminiratne. 25/1992 Patterns and trends in the spatial diffusion of the Torres Strait Islander population, J. Taylor and W.S. Arthur. 26/1992 Aborigines, tourism and sustainable development, J.C. Altman and J. Finlayson. 27/1992 Political spoils or political largesse? Regional development in northern Quebec, Canada and Australia's Northern Territory, C. Scott. 28/1992 Survey or census? Estimation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander housing need in large urban areas, J. Taylor. 29/1992 An analysis of the Aboriginal component of Commonwealth fiscal flows to the Northern Territory, D.E. Smith. 30/1992 Estimating Northern Territory Government program expenditure for Aboriginal people: problems and implications, D.E. Smith. 31/1992 Estimating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander fertility from census data, K.W.H.Gaminiratne. 32/1992 The determinants of Aboriginal employment income, A.E. Daly. 33/1992 Occupational segregation: a comparison between employed Aborigines, Torres Strait Islanders and other Australians, J. Taylor. 34/1992 Aboriginal population change in remote Australia, : data issues, J. Taylor. 35/1992 A comparison of the socioeconomic characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, J. Taylor and K.H.W. Gaminiratne. 36/1992 The CDEP scheme: a census-based analysis of the labour market status of participants in 1986, J.C. Altman and A.E. Daly.
21 37/1993 Indigenous Australians in the National Tourism Strategy: impact, sustainability and policy issues, J.C. Altman. 38/1993 Education and employment for young Aborigines, A.E. Daly. 39/1993 Self-employment amongst Aboriginal people, A.E.Daly. 40/1993 Aboriginal socioeconomic change in the Northern Territory, , J. Taylor. 41/1993 ATSlC's mechanisms for resource allocation: current policy and practice, D.E. Smith. 42/1993 The fiscal equalisation model: options for ATSIC's future funding policy and practice, D.E. Smith. 43/1993 The position of older Aboriginal people in the labour market, A.E. Daly. 44/1993 Determining the labour force status of Aboriginal people using a multinomial logit model, A.E. Daly, B. Allen, L. Aufflick, E. Bosworth, and M. Caruso. 45/1993 Indigenous Australians and the labour market: issues for the union movement in the 1990s, J.C. Altman and A.E. Hawke. 46/1993 Rethinking the fundamentals of social policy towards indigenous Australians: block grants, mainstreaming and the multiplicity of agencies and programs, W. Sanders. 47/1993 Compensating indigenous Australian 'losers': a community-oriented approach from the Aboriginal policy arena, J.C. Altman and D.E. Smith. 48/1993 Work and welfare for indigenous Australians, A.E. Daly and A.E. Hawke. 49/1993 Change in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population distribution, , K.H.W. Gaminiratne. For information on earlier CAEPR Discussion Papers contact Nicky Lumb, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Faculty of Arts, Australian National University, Canberra ACT Ph (06) Fax (06)
22
23
Self-employment amongst Aboriginal people. A.E. Daly No.39/1993 ISSN ISBN X
Self-employment amongst Aboriginal people A.E. Daly No.39/1993 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1713 X SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established in March 1990 under
More informationa n u C AI E P R entre for conomic per
a n u C AI E P R entre for conomic Di per Do fluctuations in the Australian macroeconomy influence Aboriginal employment status? J.C. Altman and A.E. Daly No.21/1992 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1357 6 SERIES
More informationEducation and employment for young Aborigines. A.E. Daly No.38/1993 ISSN ISBN
Education and employment for young Aborigines A.E. Daly No.38/1993 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1712 1 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established in March 1990
More informationAboriginal economic status by ATSIC regions: analyses of 1986 Census data H. Tesfaghiorghis No.11/1991
per Aboriginal economic status by ATSIC regions: analyses of 1986 Census data H. Tesfaghiorghis No.11/1991 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1267 7 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research
More informationThe participation of Aboriginal people in the Australian labour market A.E. Daly No.6/1991
DI C AI E conomic P R The participation of Aboriginal people in the Australian labour market A.E. Daly No.6/1991 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1247 2 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CAEPR)
More informationentre for Aboriginal onomic
entre for Aboriginal onomic esearch The relative economic status of indigenous people in New South Wales, 1991 and 1996 J. Taylor No. 173/1998 Discussion Paper Series Note The Centre for Aboriginal Economic
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. The interrelationships between arrest and employment: more evidence on the social determinants of indigenous employment
The interrelationships between arrest and employment: more evidence on the social determinants of indigenous employment B. Hunter and J. Borland No. 136/1997 DISCUSSION PAPER Series Note The Centre for
More informationCAEPR Indigenous Population Project 2011 Census Papers
CAEPR Indigenous Population Project 2011 Census Papers Paper 10 Labour Market Outcomes Matthew Gray, a Monica Howlett b and Boyd Hunter c a. Professor of Public Policy and Director, CAEPR b. Research Officer,
More informationSocial indicators of the Aboriginal population of Australia A. Gray and H. Tesfaghiorghis No.18/1991
per Social indicators of the Aboriginal population of Australia A. Gray and H. Tesfaghiorghis No.18/1991 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1297 9 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research
More informationbulletin 139 Youth justice in Australia Summary Bulletin 139 MArch 2017
Bulletin 139 MArch 2017 Youth justice in Australia 2015 16 Summary This bulletin examines the numbers and rates of young people who were under youth justice supervision in Australia during 2015 16 because
More informationTowards an index of relative Indigenous socioeconomic disadvantage
Towards an index of relative Indigenous socioeconomic disadvantage M.C. Gray and A.J. Auld No. 196/2000 ISSN 1036 1774 ISBN 07315 2631 7 Matthew Gray is a Post-doctoral Fellow and Tony Auld was a Research
More informationAustralian Indigenous Employment Disadvantage: What, why and where to from here?
Journal of Economic and Social Policy Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 2 1-1-2001 Australian Indigenous Employment Disadvantage: What, why and where to from here? Rae Norris University of the Sunshine Coast Follow
More informationSubmission to the House of Representatives Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Issues
Submission to the House of Representatives Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Issues Inquiry into the high level of involvement of Indigenous juveniles and young adults in the criminal
More informationAboriginal Employment Equity by the Year Edited by J.C. Altman
Aboriginal Employment Equity by the Year 2000 Edited by J.C. Altman Published for the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia by Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research Australian National University,
More informationTHE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. Aboriginal onomic. esearch. The relative economic status of indigenous people in Victoria, 1991 and 1996
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY centre for Aboriginal onomic esearch The relative economic status of indigenous people in Victoria, 1991 and 1996 J. Taylor No. 174/1998 Discussion Paper Series Note
More informationQueensland s Labour Market Progress: A 2006 Census of Population and Housing Profile
Queensland s Labour Market Progress: A 2006 Census of Population and Housing Profile Issue No. 9 People in Queensland Labour Market Research Unit August 2008 Key Points Queensland s Labour Market Progress:
More informationIndigenous self-employment: miracle cure or risky business?
Indigenous self-employment: miracle cure or risky business? B.H. Hunter No. 176/1999 ISSN 1036 1774 ISBN 0 7315 2611 2 Dr Boyd Hunter is Research Fellow at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research,
More informationThe economic status of Indigenous Australians. J.C. Altman. No. 193/2000 ISSN ISBN
The economic status of Indigenous Australians J.C. Altman No. 193/2000 ISSN 1036 1774 ISBN 07315 2628 7 Professor Jon Altman is the Director at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian
More informationThe determinants of employment income for indigenous Australians. A.E. Daly No.68/1994 ISSN ISBN
jed The determinants of employment income for indigenous Australians A.E. Daly No.68/1994 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1742 3 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established
More informationEthical Dilemma Economic Status of Indigenous Australians
www.graduateskills.edu.au 1 Ethical Dilemma Economic Status of Australians Description The Economic Status of Australians: an exercise addressing sustainability and ethical issues Task Type In class activity,
More informationDynamics of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Labour Markets
1 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF LABOUR ECONOMICS VOLUME 20 NUMBER 1 2017 Dynamics of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Labour Markets Boyd Hunter, (Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research,) The Australian National
More informationAre the Gaps Closing? Regional Trends and Forecasts of Indigenous Employment
263 Volume 12 Number 3 2009 pp 263-280 Are the Gaps Closing? Regional Trends and Forecasts of Indigenous Employment N. Biddle, J. Taylor and M. Yap, Australian National University Abstract This paper examines
More informationPatterns and trends in the spatial diffusion of the Torres Strait Islander population
per Patterns and trends in the spatial diffusion of the Torres Strait Islander population J. Taylor and W.S. Arthur No.25/1992 ISSN 1036-1774 ISBN 0 7315 1423 8 SERIES NOTE The Centre for Aboriginal Economic
More informationFurther key insights from the Indigenous Community Governance Project, 2006
Further key insights from the Indigenous Community Governance Project, 2006 J. Hunt 1 and D.E. Smith 2 1. Fellow, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University, Canberra;
More informationJournal of Indigenous Policy Issue 5
Theme: Reconciliation the Way Forward (133 pages) Published in March 2006 Articles: Introduction: Reconciliation the Way Forward Editors: Jason GLANVILLE is Director of Policy and Strategy at Reconciliation
More informationINCOME, WORK AND EDUCATION: INSIGHTS FOR CLOSING THE GAP IN URBAN AUSTRALIA B. HUNTER AND M. YAP
INCOME, WORK AND EDUCATION: INSIGHTS FOR CLOSING THE GAP IN URBAN AUSTRALIA B. HUNTER AND M. YAP Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences CAEPR WORKING PAPER
More informationAbstract for the Introduction
The Indigenous Welfare Economy and the CDEP Scheme Abstract for the Introduction The aim of the conference on which this book is based was to encourage debate and discussion about the Indigenous welfare
More informationTHE DETERMINANTS OF LABOUR FORCE STATUS AMONG INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS
ECONOMICS THE DETERMINANTS OF LABOUR FORCE STATUS AMONG INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS by Benjamin J. Stephens The University of Western Australia DISCUSSION PAPER 10.11 The Determinants of Labour Force Status
More informationNATIONAL POPULATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA
NATIONAL POPULATION PLAN FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA February 2019 KNOWLEDGE POLICY PRACTICE KEY POINTS People vote with their feet and many are showing strong preferences for living in regions. Enhancing liveability
More informationINDIGENOUS PROTECTED AREAS IN AUSTRALIA
INDIGENOUS PROTECTED AREAS IN AUSTRALIA 1 Dermot Smyth Published in PARKS the International Journal for Protected Area Managers, Vol 16 No. 1, pp 14-20. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas Introduction
More informationThe Determinants of Labour Force Status among Indigenous Australians
287 Volume 13 Number 3 2010 pp 287-312 The Determinants of Labour Force Status among Indigenous Australians Benjamin J. Stephens, University of Western Australia Abstract It is well established that Indigenous
More informationElection 2010: Towards justice, rights and reconciliation?
Election 2010: Towards justice, rights and reconciliation? An analysis of the major parties Indigenous affairs election platforms Election campaign analysis Indigenous issues scarcely rated a mention until
More informationLegal Studies. Stage 6 Syllabus
Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus Original published version updated: April 2000 Board Bulletin/Offical Notices Vol 9 No 2 (BOS 13/00) October 2009 Assessment and Reporting information updated The Board of
More informationRemote Area Health Services In The Northern Territory: Matching Resources To Needs
Remote Area Health Services In The Northern Territory: Matching Resources To Needs Dr Robyn McDermott Australian Rural Health Research Institute, Menzies School of Health Research, Alice Springs 3rd National
More information6. Mainstreaming Indigenous Service Delivery
6. Mainstreaming Indigenous Service Delivery Professor Ian Marsh From 1988 until 2004, the policy framework for indigenous affairs in and beyond remote Australia marched to a different drumbeat. In this
More informationRefugees and regional settlement: win win?
Refugees and regional settlement: win win? Paper presented at the Australian Social Policy Conference Looking Back, Looking Forward 20 22 July 2005, University of New South Wales Janet Taylor Brotherhood
More informationEconomic correlates of Net Interstate Migration to the NT (NT NIM): an exploratory analysis
Research Brief Issue 04, 2016 Economic correlates of Net Interstate Migration to the NT (NT NIM): an exploratory analysis Dean Carson Demography & Growth Planning, Northern Institute dean.carson@cdu.edu.au
More informationParticipation and representation in ATSIC elections: a ten-year perspective
Participation and representation in ATSIC elections: a ten-year perspective W. Sanders, J. Taylor and K. Ross No. 198/2000 ISSN 1036 1774 ISBN 0 7315 2633 3 Dr Will Sanders is Fellow, Dr John Taylor is
More information2011 Census Papers. CAEPR Indigenous Population Project
CAEPR Indigenous Population Project 2011 Census Papers Paper 18 The changing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population: Evidence from the 2006 11 Australian Census Longitudinal Dataset Nicholas
More informationMigrant Services and Programs Summary
Migrant Services and Programs Summary Review of Post Arrival Programs and Services for Migrants Migrant Services and Programs Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1978, pp 3-13 and 15-28.
More informationState-nominated Occupation List
State-nominated Occupation List Industry skills requirement through state-nominated skilled migration APRIL 2016 Page 1 RESTAURANT & CATERING AUSTRALIA Restaurant & Catering Australia (R&CA) is the national
More informationThe abolition of ATSIC Implications for democracy
The abolition of ATSIC Implications for democracy Larissa Behrendt Professor of Law and Indigenous Studies University of Technology, Sydney The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC)
More informationAboriginal Self-determination: 'Fine Words and Crocodile Tears'?*
Aboriginal Self-determination: 'Fine Words and Crocodile Tears'?* As Australians become increasingly aware of the approaching Sydney 2000 Olympic Games, some public policy issues that many hoped would
More informationThe Northern Territory s Non-resident Workforce - one Census on (Issue No )
Demography and Growth Planning The Northern Institute The Northern Territory s Non-resident Workforce - one Census on (Issue No. 201304) The Northern Institute, 2013: This material is submitted for peer
More informationand with support from BRIEFING NOTE 1
and with support from BRIEFING NOTE 1 Inequality and growth: the contrasting stories of Brazil and India Concern with inequality used to be confined to the political left, but today it has spread to a
More information1. OVERVIEW (RECOMMENDATIONS 1-3)
1 1. OVERVIEW (RECOMMENDATIONS 1-3) The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody ( RCIADIC ) was established in October 1987 in response to a growing public concern that deaths in custody of
More informationAnother Decade for Homelands Policy Debacle
Arguing the Intervention Another Decade for Homelands Policy Debacle In a media release issued on March 28 this year the Australian Government announced a $221 million investment in municipal and essential
More informationPoverty profile and social protection strategy for the mountainous regions of Western Nepal
October 2014 Karnali Employment Programme Technical Assistance Poverty profile and social protection strategy for the mountainous regions of Western Nepal Policy Note Introduction This policy note presents
More informationSarah Lim ** The committee aims to report by September Australasian Parliamentary Review, Spring 2004, Vol. 19(1),
Hands-on Parliament a Parliamentary Committee Inquiry into Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Participation in Queensland s Democratic Process * Sarah Lim ** The consolidation of the Queensland
More informationSTRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Population and Demographic Challenges in Rural Newfoundland & Labrador
STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Population and Demographic Challenges in Rural Newfoundland & Labrador An Executive Summary 1 This paper has been prepared for the Strengthening Rural
More informationSUSTAINING THE RECONCILIATION PROCESS*
The Journal of Indigenous Policy - Issue 5 SUSTAINING THE RECONCILIATION PROCESS* INTRODUCTION SHELLEY REYS* and DAVID COOPER** The National Reconciliation Workshop 2005 aims to consider and endorse a
More informationCOMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE - RECONCILIATION: AUSTRALIA S CHALLENGE1
The Journal o f Indigenous Policy - Issue 5 COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE - RECONCILIATION: AUSTRALIA S CHALLENGE1 This document is the Executive Summary of the Government s response to the final report
More informationpoverty, social exclusion and welfare in rural places Paul Milbourne School of City and Regional Planning Cardiff University, UK
poverty, social exclusion and welfare in rural places Paul Milbourne School of City and Regional Planning Cardiff University, UK definitional issues relative poverty defined in terms of modal income levels
More informationVisa Entry to the United Kingdom The Entry Clearance Operation
Visa Entry to the United Kingdom The Entry Clearance Operation REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 367 Session 2003-2004: 17 June 2004 LONDON: The Stationery Office 10.75 Ordered by the House
More information6. Population & Migration
078 6. Population & Migration Between the September Quarter 2012 and the June Quarter 2017 South Australia had the lowest population growth rate of all mainland states. Over the coming years South Australia
More informationA POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR COASTAL AUSTRALIA
A POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR COASTAL AUSTRALIA Author: Alan Stokes, Executive Director, National Sea Change Taskforce Introduction This proposed Coastal Policy Framework has been developed by the National Sea
More informationEmployment & Community Participation
Employment & Community Participation P articipating in employment is a foundation of social inclusion, recognised by governments across Australia as creating opportunities for independence and personal
More informationTHE NORTHERN TERRITORY S RY S OVERSEAS BORN POPULATION
STUDIES RESEARCH BRIEF ISSUE Number 2008010 School for Social and Policy Research 2008 Population Studies Group School for Social and Policy Research Charles Darwin University Northern Territory 0909 dean.carson@cdu.edu.au
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 May /10 MIGR 43 SOC 311
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 4 May 2010 9248/10 MIGR 43 SOC 311 "I/A" ITEM NOTE from: Presidency to: Permanent Representatives Committee/Council and Representatives of the Governments of the
More informationSelected macro-economic indicators relating to structural changes in agricultural employment in the Slovak Republic
Selected macro-economic indicators relating to structural changes in agricultural employment in the Slovak Republic Milan Olexa, PhD 1. Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic Economic changes after
More informationSubmission to Australian Government. Federal Budget
Submission to Australian Government Federal Budget 2018-2019 National Association of Community Legal Centres ABN 67 757 001 303 ACN 163 101 737 Tel: 61 2 9264 9595 Fax: 61 2 9264 9594 Email: naclc@clc.net.au
More informationInternational Migration and Development: Proposed Work Program. Development Economics. World Bank
International Migration and Development: Proposed Work Program Development Economics World Bank January 2004 International Migration and Development: Proposed Work Program International migration has profound
More informationPREVENTION OF VIOLENT CRIME: THE WORK OF THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON VIOLENCE
PREVENTION OF VIOLENT CRIME: THE WORK OF THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON VIOLENCE Duncan Chappell Director Australian Institute of Criminology IN 1987 IN MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA'S SECOND LARGEST CITY, THERE OCCURRED
More information23. Social justice and human rights: using Indigenous socioeconomic data in policy development
23. Social justice and human rights: using Indigenous socioeconomic data in policy development Tom Calma The perspective that I intend to bring to this discussion is a human rights one. I want to reflect
More informationDiscussion paper: Register of places and objects
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 Discussion paper: Register of places and objects Foreword The Western Australian Government is committed to the protection and preservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage
More informationLocation and Segregation: The Distribution of the Indigenous Population Across Australia s Urban Centres
Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research Location and Segregation: The Distribution of the Indigenous Population Across Australia s Urban Centres N. Biddle CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 53/2009 ANU COLLEGE
More informationThe NSW Aboriginal Land Council s. Submission: Australian Constitutional reform to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
The NSW Aboriginal Land Council s Submission: Australian Constitutional reform to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples September 2011 1 Overview: The NSW Aboriginal Land Council (NSWALC)
More informationSUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 23.10.2007 SEC(2007) 1382 C6-0011/08 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the conditions for
More informationMigrant Services and Programs Statement by the Prime Minister
Migrant Services and Programs Statement by the Prime Minister From: Commonwealth of Australia Background to the Review of Post Arrival Programs and Services for Migrants Canberra, Commonwealth Government
More informationThe People of Australia. Australia s Multicultural Policy
The People of Australia Australia s Multicultural Policy Foreword Prime Minister of Australia, the Hon Julia Gillard MP Australia is a multicultural country. We sing Australians all because we are. Our
More informationThe People of. Australia s Multicultural Policy
The People of Australia Australia s Multicultural Policy The People of Australia Australia s Multicultural Policy Foreword Prime Minister of Australia, the Hon Julia Gillard MP Australia is a multicultural
More informationAustralian Indigenous People s Caucus Response Questionnaire on Indigenous Issues /PFII January 2017
Ms. Bas Director of the Division for Social Policy and Development Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Division for Social Policy and Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs
More informationAccess to Justice Review Volume 2 Report and Recommendations August 2016
Access to Justice Review Volume 2 Report and Recommendations August 2016 ACCESS TO JUSTICE REVIEW VOLUME 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS August 2016 The Department of Justice and Regulation acknowledges the
More informationTalking Point: The missing migrants. Page 1
Talking Point: The missing migrants Page 1 Executive Summary Higher rates of population growth in our big cities are not driven by Australians moving from the regions to the city. Regional Australia has
More informationSome reasons for the rise of the Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Estate
Some reasons for the rise of the Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Estate Tim Rowse FAHA, Western Sydney University Note that this paper is not exactly as I delivered it. It has been revised to take into
More informationResponse to the Department of Home Affairs consultation on Managing Australia's Migrant Intake
Response to the Department of Home Affairs consultation on Managing Australia's Migrant Intake February 2018 Business Council of Australia February 2018 1 The Business Council of Australia draws on the
More informationEMPLOYMENT AND POPULATION ADJUSTMENT IN RURAL AUSTRALIA. Anne Margaret Garnett
EMPLOYMENT AND POPULATION ADJUSTMENT IN RURAL AUSTRALIA Anne Margaret Garnett A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Canberra Canberra April 2007 ABSTRACT Rural regions
More informationFuture Directions for Multiculturalism
Future Directions for Multiculturalism Council of the Australian Institute of Multicultural Affairs, Future Directions for Multiculturalism - Final Report of the Council of AIMA, Melbourne, AIMA, 1986,
More informationENDOGENOUS EMPLOYMENT GROWTH AND DECLINE IN SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND
Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008 95 ENDOGENOUS EMPLOYMENT GROWTH AND DECLINE IN SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND Alistair Robson UQ Social Research Centre, Institute of Social Science,
More informationPersistent Inequality
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Ontario December 2018 Persistent Inequality Ontario s Colour-coded Labour Market Sheila Block and Grace-Edward Galabuzi www.policyalternatives.ca RESEARCH ANALYSIS
More informationDepartment of Immigration and Border Protection Discussion Paper Reviewing the Skilled Migration and 400 Series Visa Programmes
CCIQ SUBMISSION Department of Immigration and Border Protection Discussion Paper Reviewing the Skilled Migration and 400 Series Visa Programmes CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND 17 October 2014
More informationMassey Research Online
Massey Research Online Massey University s Institutional Repository Massey Author: Hunter, Boyd Hunter, B. (2005). A tale of two nations: The divergent pathways for indigenous labour force outcomes in
More informationFuture of Work. Temporary Overseas Worker Policy
Future of Work Temporary Overseas Worker Policy 1. The ACTU believes that the current and future skills needs of Australia can be best met through a strategic approach to: a) skill development, including
More informationConference: Building Effective Indigenous Governance 4-7 November 2003, JABIRU
Conference: Building Effective Indigenous Governance 4-7 November 2003, JABIRU Harold Furber, Elizabeth Ganter and Jocelyn Davies 1 Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre (DK-CRC): Harnessing Research
More informationBELARUS ETF COUNTRY PLAN Socioeconomic background
BELARUS ETF COUNTRY PLAN 2007 1. Socioeconomic background Belarus is a lower middle-income country with a per capita GDP of 2,760 USD in 2005 (Atlas method GNI). The economy is highly industrialized, and
More informationAboriginal People in Canadian Cities,
Aboriginal People in Canadian Cities, 1951 1996 Guide for Research in Summer, 2002 Evelyn J. Peters Department of Geography University of Saskatchewan 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK S7J 3S9 (306) 966-5639
More informationQuestionnaire to Governments
Questionnaire to Governments The report of the 13 th Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues provides a number of recommendations within its mandated areas, some of which are addressed to
More informationChapter One: people & demographics
Chapter One: people & demographics The composition of Alberta s population is the foundation for its post-secondary enrolment growth. The population s demographic profile determines the pressure points
More informationSection 1 Background and approach
Section 1 Background and approach In the mid 1980s justice responses to domestic violence were introduced in all Australian State and Territory jurisdictions. They were the outcome of the political influence
More information2011 HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON YOUTH General Assembly United Nations New York July 2011
2011 HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON YOUTH General Assembly United Nations New York 25-26 July 2011 Thematic panel 2: Challenges to youth development and opportunities for poverty eradication, employment and sustainable
More informationAustralia s Homeless Youth 103
7 Homelessness is the most extreme form of poverty. In turn, living in poverty is one of the structural factors that leads to becoming homeless. While there has been a debate about how to measure poverty,
More informationSubmission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Australia s Migrant Intake
12 June 2015 Migrant Intake Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 Canberra City ACT 2601 By email: migrant.intake@pc.gov.au Submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Australia s Migrant Intake
More informationThe Demography of the Territory s
The Demography of the Territory s Midtowns : Jabiru (Issue No.201401) The Northern Institute, 2013: This material is submitted for peer review. Correct citation is necessary. KEY FINDINGS The West Arnhem
More informationPost-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force
Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September 2018 Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force Contents Population Trends... 2 Key Labour Force Statistics... 5 New Brunswick Overview... 5 Sub-Regional
More informationBudget Response from Academic Stand Against Poverty. Associate Professor Danielle Celermajer, Co-Chair, ASAP Oceania, University of Sydney
Budget Response from Academic Stand Against Poverty Associate Professor Danielle Celermajer, Co-Chair, ASAP Oceania, University of Sydney The 2014-15 federal budget has several clear and clearly detrimental
More informationSTRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Demographic Crisis in Rural Ontario
STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Demographic Crisis in Rural Ontario An Executive Summary 1 This paper has been prepared for the Strengthening Rural Canada initiative by: Dr. Bakhtiar
More informationGLOBALIZATION, DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY REDUCTION: THEIR SOCIAL AND GENDER DIMENSIONS
TALKING POINTS FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ROUNDTABLE 1: GLOBALIZATION, DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY REDUCTION: THEIR SOCIAL AND GENDER DIMENSIONS Distinguished delegates, Ladies and gentlemen: I am pleased
More informationRegulating influence and access: Submission to the Inquiry into the Lobbying Code of Conduct by the Senate Finance and Public Affairs Committee
Regulating influence and access: Submission to the Inquiry into the Lobbying Code of Conduct by the Senate Finance and Public Affairs Committee 10 June 2008 Kerrie Tucker, Project Officer with Deirdre
More informationUNEMPLOYMENT IN AUSTRALIA
UNEMPLOYMENT IN AUSTRALIA Professor Sue Richardson President Introduction Unemployment is a scourge in countries at all levels of economic development. It brings poverty and despair and exclusion from
More informationThe Coalition s Policy for Indigenous Affairs
1 The Coalition s Policy for Indigenous Affairs September 2013 2 Key Points The Coalition believes indigenous Australians deserve a better future, with more job opportunities, empowered individuals and
More information