Journal des débats (Hansard) Official Report of Debates (Hansard) No. 10 N o 10. Jeudi 26 juillet Thursday 26 July 2018

Transcription

1 Legislative Assembly of Ontario Assemblée législative de l Ontario Official Report of Debates (Hansard) Journal des débats (Hansard) No. 10 N o 10 1 st Session 42 nd Parliament Thursday 26 July re session 42 e législature Jeudi 26 juillet 2018 Speaker: Honourable Ted Arnott Clerk: Todd Decker Président : L honorable Ted Arnott Greffier : Todd Decker

2 Hansard on the Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly can be on your personal computer within hours after each sitting. The address is: Le Journal des débats sur Internet L adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel le Journal et d autres documents de l Assemblée législative en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : Index inquiries Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing staff at Renseignements sur l index Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents du Journal des débats au personnel de l index, qui vous fourniront des références aux pages dans l index cumulatif, en composant le Hansard Reporting and Interpretation Services Room 500, West Wing, Legislative Building 111 Wellesley Street West, Queen s Park Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Telephone ; fax Published by the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Service du Journal des débats et d interprétation Salle 500, aile ouest, Édifice du Parlement 111, rue Wellesley ouest, Queen s Park Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Téléphone, ; télécopieur, Publié par l Assemblée législative de l Ontario ISSN

3 CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES Thursday 26 July 2018 / Jeudi 26 juillet 2018 Royal assent / Sanction royale The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott) Notices of reasoned amendments The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott) ORDERS OF THE DAY / ORDRE DU JOUR Government policies Mr. Aris Babikian Ms. Catherine Fife Mr. Stephen Lecce Mrs. Gila Martow Mme France Gélinas Debate deemed adjourned INTRODUCTION OF VISITORS / PRÉSENTATION DES VISITEURS Mr. Parm Gill Miss Kinga Surma Mr. Aris Babikian Mrs. Nina Tangri Mr. Stan Cho Ms. Catherine Fife Mrs. Daisy Wai Mr. Tom Rakocevic Mrs. Gila Martow Hon. Christine Elliott ORAL QUESTIONS / QUESTIONS ORALES Mental health services Ms. Andrea Horwath Hon. Christine Elliott Government policies Ms. Andrea Horwath Hon. Rod Phillips Addiction services Ms. Andrea Horwath Hon. Christine Elliott Taxation Mr. Stan Cho Hon. Rod Phillips Curriculum Ms. Marit Stiles Hon. Lisa M. Thompson Immigrant and refugee services Mrs. Nina Tangri Hon. Lisa MacLeod School facilities Mr. Peter Tabuns Hon. Lisa M. Thompson Taxation Mr. Michael Parsa Hon. Rod Phillips Affordable housing Ms. Jessica Bell Hon. Steve Clark Immigrant and refugee services Mrs. Amy Fee Hon. Lisa MacLeod Affordable housing Ms. Bhutila Karpoche Hon. Steve Clark Economic development Ms. Jill Dunlop Hon. Jim Wilson Automotive industry Ms. Teresa J. Armstrong Hon. John Yakabuski Retirement homes Mr. Bill Walker Hon. Raymond Sung Joon Cho Hospital funding Mme France Gélinas Hon. Christine Elliott Government contracts Ms. Catherine Fife Hon. Greg Rickford Government s agenda Mr. Stephen Lecce Hon. Greg Rickford Greenhouse gas emissions Mr. Gilles Bisson Hon. Rod Phillips INTRODUCTION OF VISITORS / PRÉSENTATION DES VISITEURS Ms. Suze Morrison Mrs. Amy Fee Ms. Jill Dunlop

4 MEMBERS STATEMENTS / DÉCLARATIONS DES DÉPUTÉS Incident in Spadina Fort York Mr. Chris Glover Circonscription de Glengarry Prescott Russell Mme Amanda Simard Riding of Thunder Bay Atikokan Ms. Judith Monteith-Farrell Events in Aurora Oak Ridges Richmond Hill Mr. Michael Parsa Regent Park Ms. Suze Morrison The Common Table Free Farmers Market Mr. Michael Coteau Cambridge Scottish Festival Mrs. Belinda Karahalios Fort Erie Race Track Mr. Wayne Gates Hockey for Humanity Khalsa Cup Mr. Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria Barry Rutledge Ms. Andrea Khanjin Notice of dissatisfaction The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott) MOTIONS Committee membership Hon. Todd Smith Mr. Stephen Lecce Motion agreed to PETITIONS / PÉTITIONS Indigenous affairs Ms. Bhutila Karpoche Anti-smoking initiatives for youth Mme France Gélinas GO Transit Mr. Billy Pang Employment standards Ms. Bhutila Karpoche Public transit Mr. Billy Pang PRIVATE MEMBERS PUBLIC BUSINESS / AFFAIRES D INTÉRÊT PUBLIC ÉMANANT DES DÉPUTÉS Skilled trades Ms. Jill Dunlop Mr. Gilles Bisson Mr. David Piccini Mme France Gélinas Ms. Andrea Khanjin Ms. Jill Dunlop Immigrant and refugee services Mrs. Amy Fee Ms. Jennifer K. French Mrs. Nina Tangri Mrs. Daisy Wai Mr. Sheref Sabawy Hon. Lisa MacLeod Mr. Michael Coteau Mrs. Amy Fee Compassionate Care Act, 2018, Bill 3, Mr. Oosterhoff / Loi de 2018 sur les soins de compassion, projet de loi 3, M. Oosterhoff Mr. Sam Oosterhoff Mr. John Vanthof Mr. Stephen Lecce Ms. Sara Singh Ms. Natalia Kusendova Mrs. Gila Martow Mr. Sam Oosterhoff Skilled trades Motion agreed to Immigrant and refugee services The Acting Speaker (Mr. Percy Hatfield) Compassionate Care Act, 2018, Bill 3, Mr. Oosterhoff / Loi de 2018 sur les soins de compassion, projet de loi 3, M. Oosterhoff Second reading agreed to Immigrant and refugee services Motion agreed to

5 357 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DE L ONTARIO Thursday 26 July 2018 Jeudi 26 juillet 2018 The House met at The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott): Let us pause for a moment of silence for inner thought and personal reflection. Prayers. ROYAL ASSENT SANCTION ROYALE The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott): I beg to inform the House that in the name of Her Majesty the Queen, Her Honour the Administrator has been pleased to assent to a certain bill in her office. The Clerk-at-the-Table (Ms. Valerie Quioc Lim): The following is the title of the bill to which Her Honour did assent: An Act respecting Hydro One Limited, the termination of the White Pines Wind Project and the labour disputes between York University and Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3903 / Loi concernant Hydro One Limited, l annulation du projet de parc éolien White Pines et les conflits de travail entre l Université York et la section locale 3903 du Syndicat canadien de la fonction publique. NOTICES OF REASONED AMENDMENTS The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott): I beg to inform the House that, pursuant to standing order 71(b), both the member for Ottawa Vanier and the member for Toronto Danforth have notified the Clerk of their intention to file notice of a reasoned amendment to the motion for second reading of Bill 4, An Act respecting the preparation of a climate change plan, providing for the wind down of the cap and trade program and repealing the Climate Change Mitigation and Low-carbon Economy Act, The order for second reading of Bill 4 may therefore not be called today. ORDERS OF THE DAY GOVERNMENT POLICIES Resuming the debate adjourned on July 24, 2018, on the motion regarding government priorities. The Speaker (Hon. Ted Arnott): Further debate. Mr. Aris Babikian: Good morning, Mr. Speaker. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on your election as Speaker. I am confident that your experience and skills make you the ideal individual for the position, and you will do us proud by guiding the Legislature over the next four years. I would like also to congratulate my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for the great privilege that the people have entrusted in them and for being part of the class of Mr. Speaker, I am humbled to stand here today to address this august chamber as the first Canadian Armenian to serve not only in the Ontario Legislature but also in any other provincial Legislature in this wonderful country of ours. Who would have thought that on the 40th anniversary of my arrival to Canada as a refugee, I would be bestowed the distinct honour of serving the crown and the people of Ontario? I owe this privilege to the people of Scarborough Agincourt, my volunteers, my community, my friends and, finally, my family. Scarborough Agincourt has been my home since My two nieces, Gacia, which means cinnamon in Armenian, and Meghri, which means honey in Armenian, were both born there. I m a founding member of the Wishing Well community association and served on its board for two terms. I was also one of the founding members of the Willowdale legal aid clinic and served on its board for one term. Scarborough Agincourt is one of the most diverse ridings in Ontario. Many ethnic communities call the riding home. Amongst them are the Chinese, Greek, Tamil, Filipino, Armenian, Italian, South Asian, Hispanic, Lebanese, Coptic, Middle Eastern, East European, Afro- Canadian and many more. They all help enrich the riding s social fabric and its multicultural nature, making it an ideal place to live and work. We are proud to be the home of Vimy Oaks Farm. Leslie Miller, who fought in the Battle of Vimy Ridge, gathered a handful of acorns from the battlefield and planted them in his farmland in Scarborough. It is now home to the Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church on Kennedy Road. He called his farm Vimy Oaks Farm. Today, several of the original oaks still survive. However, the oaks at Vimy Ridge in France have not survived. The Vimy Foundation, in partnership with the Vimy Oaks Legacy Corp., is working to repatriate those Vimy oaks of Scarborough Agincourt back to Vimy, to help preserve Canada s First World War legacy through the creation of a living memorial. Additionally, the Scarborough Hospital, Birchmount site, formerly Grace Hospital, is located in our riding. I am sure that under the leadership of Premier Doug Ford, the

6 358 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO 26 JULY 2018 riding will become home of the Bridletowne community health hub, where it will host the biggest dialysis centre in Ontario. After 31 years of Liberal reign in Scarborough Agincourt, our riding s residents decided that it is time for change. They resolutely believe in Ford Nation s message of revising the sex education curriculum, extending the Sheppard subway line to Scarborough Town Centre, ending the hallway health care debacle, reducing skyrocketing hydro rates, restoring the public s trust in government, and bringing accountability and fiscal responsibility to Queen s Park. I m overwhelmed by their confidence and trust in Premier Ford, the PC Party and me. Over 50% of our residents voted for me. I would like to thank the hundreds of volunteers who also believed in our mission. Our 21-month journey culminated with the June 7 victory. I would like to make special mention of the youths who were the core of my volunteers. I would also like to pay special mention to two 12-year-olds who were the heart and soul of the campaign. I would like to mention Aris Movsessian, who is here with us today in the gallery with his mother, and Garen Demerjian. Both of them were amazing. They were at the campaign office every day. They have a bright future ahead of them. My gratitude also goes to my sister, Sevan Hajinian, who was my campaign manager, to my mother and to the rest of my family. Without the hard work, commitment and sacrifices of the volunteers and my family, I would not be standing here among my esteemed colleagues of this House. The biggest influence on my life and my lifelong dedication to helping others was my grandfather. My grandfather was a survivor of the 1915 Armenian genocide. He was six years old when he witnessed the brutal killing of his six brothers and sisters, in addition to his father and 40 members of his extended family. When I was a kid, I used to listen to the horrific trauma that he lived through. I would see the sadness in his eyes. He always encouraged me to help others, to defend the vulnerable and the persecuted members of not only my society but also anywhere they lived. He was so proud of me. I was his first grandchild. Unfortunately, he did not live to witness this day By the way, close to 100 years ago Ontario became a pioneer in welcoming refugees when the province brought over 120 orphaned children between the ages of eight and 10 to Ontario. They purchased a farm in Georgetown and gave a new lease on life to these survivors of the Armenian genocide. We should be proud of our history of welcoming refugees. Since my arrival to Canada in 1978, I have been actively involved in the Canadian civil society and the multicultural communities. My contribution included political, social, neighbourhood, multi-faith, human rights, social services, education, immigration, culture and other spheres. I have served as a citizenship judge, World Vision Canada Multicultural Council ambassador, chair of Levant Settlement Centre, secretary of the Canadian Ethnocultural Council and member of the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada. As a citizenship judge, I have lectured on human rights, civic participation, tolerance, Canadian values and traditions. I am grateful to my friend the Honourable Jason Kenney, the former Minister of Immigration and Citizenship, for providing me the unique opportunity to serve the people of Canada as a citizenship judge for six years. I have a strong regard to our youth; they are our future. I have been a Wolf Cub and Boy Scouts leader, soccer coach and youth adviser. Many of the young people that I have mentored have become leaders in their communities and organizations, and successful members of our civil society. As a secretary of the Canadian Ethnocultural Council, I established excellent relationships with the leaders of our diverse social mosaic, participating in the national umbrella organization s round table on the United Nations Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, consulting with high-level federal officials and ministers regarding changes in the Canadian immigration and citizenship act, testifying at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration hearings regarding the Syrian refugee program. I also testified at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage and the CRTC. I was also the founding member of the Darfur Solidarity Coalition. These are some of the highlights of my recent public service activities. I also acted as a monitor on behalf of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe council during the 2003 parliamentary elections in Armenia. Serving as the president of the Armenian National Federation of Canada and the first executive director of the government relations office of the Armenian National Committee of Canada were additional milestones in my public calling. Together with friends, we participated in the private sponsorship and settling of over 250 Syrian refugee families. The refugees have become productive members of our community. Many are self-employed and have bought houses. Some even contributed to the recent Progressive Conservative Party victory in Scarborough Agincourt. Volunteerism, especially encouraging our youth to volunteer and get involved, has always been a priority of mine. So is the conviction that the sky is the limit for any Canadian who is willing to put in the time and make the effort. Regardless of one s colour, religion, race, name or ethnicity, Canada offers equal opportunity for all of us. In recognition of my contributions to our country, the Canadian government awarded me the Queen Elizabeth II Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals and Canada s 125th Confederation Commemorative Medal, while Ontario honoured me with its 20-year Volunteer Service Award. I will be forever grateful to Canada, to Ontario and to Canadians for providing a safe haven to me and to my

7 26 JUILLET 2018 ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DE L ONTARIO 359 family and for offering me the opportunity to fulfill my potential. My contribution over the last 40 years is a small token of appreciation to the country which gave me and my family so much. The Acting Speaker (Ms. Jennifer K. French): Further debate? I recognize the member from Waterloo. Ms. Catherine Fife: Good morning. It s a pleasure to see you in the chair, Madam Speaker, and it s always a pleasure to stand in my place in this House and bring the concerns and the voices of the people of Waterloo to the Ontario Legislature. I have to tell you that there is a growing sense of concern in my riding about the speed and the rashness of this government and how they have moved to, obviously, address cap-and-trade but not the real issues of cap-andtrade, and not the real issues of climate change, but just wiping the desk off, sending those concerns right to the floor without giving any consideration as to the impact of ending cap-and-trade in the province of Ontario. There s a lot of conflating of language around this issue, and I feel like it s done in an intentional way. There s talk of killing the carbon tax. The people of Waterloo are informed on such a level we have two universities and the environment and climate change are issues top of mind for the residents in my riding. Scrapping cap-and-trade without having a plan in place to address global warming is downright irresponsible in this age. In 2018, we should know better in this province and in this country. Ironically, the fisticuffs that the provincial government has now engaged in with the federal government the federal government will be well positioned, actually, to impose a carbon tax on this province, a carbon tax that we will not have a say in, on how it is implemented, how it is designed. This will happen in this province. The government has said that they will set aside $30 million for court costs. This is an astounding admission that the province is not on a solid footing with regard to the cancelling of cap-and-trade. By taking such an aggressive action not a micro-aggressive action; this is an aggressive action without measuring the consequences, without being open and transparent to the people of this province as to the economic impact that cancelling capand-trade will have in Ontario, this destabilizes how people feel. Certainly, in our economy, we are hearing from small businesses that will be negatively impacted by the cancelling of cap-and-trade and 758 green energy projects. Cambridge is one example. There has been a hydroelectric project ongoing for 10 years. I m the first one to admit that we have tried to address the slowness of some of these projects. Ten years, I m sure we can all agree, is a very long time to do an environmental assessment and to design an EA. The cost of that EA was $338,000. The municipality was invested, the Grand River Conservation Authority a conservation authority, that, if I may say, has been starved for money for the last 15 years under the former Liberal government. The five-year project that was going to go on in Cambridge doesn t fall into one of those drastically poorly designed projects, but it is being treated as one by this government. Some 600 residents in the Cambridge area, at the completion of this project, would have clean, renewable, cheap energy. Between 50 and 75 jobs were going to be created when you factor in the overall effect. Cambridge is a community that, quite honestly, was trying to find some solutions through the creation of this project. And all of the revenue that was going to be generated, ironically, through the hydroelectric generation was going to go back into the conservation authority to address the flood plain issue, the flooding issue, the lack of infrastructure in the dams that go all the way through the Grand River the streamline. So this was a good project, and it was just about to start. When you consider the investment that had already been made in this project and then the government completely puts on the brakes. The board has expressed their disappointment. I m sure the member from Cambridge will be hearing from businesses that had already invested time and energy and the technology to be part of a solution around creating clean energy, Madam Speaker That s not the first project that you ll hear about. I know that we all have projects in our respective ridings which will be negatively impacted by the manner in which capand-trade was cancelled in this province. The motion that we re debating this morning reads as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the current government is a government for the people. I have to tell you, if you have to state that you re a government for the people, I think that you re already expressing a sentiment which is overstating the fact. It s actually also implying that no other government in the history of this province has been a government for the people. I looked at the picture when the Premier got sworn in here. Premiers Davis and Peterson, Bob Rae and a long line of Premiers basically, the Premier was saying, I m the best Premier. I have to tell you, if you have to say that you re the best, then I think that we all know that you re really communicating a position of weakness. This motion goes on to say that you have a clear mandate to pursue policies that put more money in people s pockets. I do want to remind the government that because of our electoral system, this government, the PC government of the day, received only 40% of the votes in Ontario. Sixty per cent of the people in this province did not vote for this concept of an extra dollar in your pocket; 60% of the people in this province would really like to see that extra dollar invested in long-term care, for instance. There is a crisis in long-term care. The former Liberal government and I know that it s hard not to talk about it but it s a pretty impressive record of not doing the right thing for the people of the province. Perhaps we can agree on this. The Liberal government ceded their entire responsibility for long-term care to the private sector almost entirely. They basically said, We re going to try to maintain this mirage of caring for the public in a public universal health care system, which they were slowly undermining through privatization. But when people get

8 360 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO 26 JULY 2018 to a certain age, we re going to leave that to the corporations. In this province, the not-for-profit long-term-care homes do really good work. I want to commend them for the work that they do, because they have not seen the kind of funding that they need to actually care for our seniors in an appropriate and a compassionate way. In fact, we have brought forward a motion that tried to hold the government to account, to at least give a senior in this province who contributed to our economy, who contributed to our community and, yes, they should get at least four hours of hands-on care each day, meaning feeding, nutrition, bathing and basic hygiene. I mean, is this too much to ask? But the government refused to engage in that. Quite honestly, we have not heard anything; the PC government has been silent on the quality of long-term care. You have said that you re going to build beds. Well, I can tell you that building a long-term-care bed requires people. At the same time as we ve been engaging in this conversation about building beds, the government has put the brakes on new hires, so through attrition, we re actually losing the very people who are responsible for the caring and the managing of those systems of care. On long-term care: 60% of the people did not vote for this concept of an extra dollar in your pocket they just didn t. What they really want is the government to be responsible and accountable for the public services that they need, and that includes child care. The PC government, on child care, really does not have a solid foot to stand on, Madam Speaker. They think that an extra $5 in your pocket is going to somehow open up a child care space. They do not agree that early learning and care in fact, there is no minister responsible for this they do not believe that early learning and care is actually a public service, a public service that should be grounded in quality, in affordability, and in accessibility. The return on investment for early learning and care: I have to tell you, for every dollar invested, the return on investment is $7 to the local economy, to productivity, to education, to addressing issues of poverty. But that dollar is not going to get invested if it s in your pocket. This is the concept and the disconnect that I think we re going to be experiencing in this Legislature for the next four years. This motion goes on to say that this government is going to try to create it s actually in the motion, that the government for the people is going to create and protect jobs. And yet we heard yesterday, loud and clear, from businesses from across the province, an open letter to this government saying the manner in which you have cancelled the green energy projects carte blanche because there are some good ones in there. There are some that have been of concern, but you just decided to wipe the desk clean again. This undermines confidence in our economy. For investors who are looking to Ontario to start new businesses, to invest in the businesses that are here, the instability with which this government has made decisions causes those investors to back away. And, quite honestly, you can t blame them, especially when you come back with bumper-sticker slogans like We are going to reduce hydro by 12 cents. If you are taking one action where you are actually going to be increasing the cost of hydro by reducing renewable energy in the province of Ontario, you can t on the other hand say that you re magically going to reduce the cost of hydro, especially because you have doubled down on the Liberal plan that the Financial Accountability Officer has stated is unfair to the people of this province because you are pushing billions of dollars of debt to future generations, which you railed against when you sat on this side of the House. You railed against that Liberal plan, and now you have doubled down and endorsed it, and then you threw a little gasoline on the whole mess by cancelling the 758 green energy projects. This is a government that is practising walking in full contradiction of the rhetoric and the action. It s going to be a full-time job for us on this side of the House, Madam Speaker, to hold this government to account, because they re throwing it at us so quickly that it s hard for us to do our due diligence and bring those voices of our respective ridings and concerns to this place. But I can tell you that the people of Waterloo region right now are feeling very concerned but also are really looking to the two NDP members and saying, Can you explain why this government is acting the way that it is when it knows that it is compromising confidence in our economy, when it is signalling to investors across Canada, even our other provinces, and is doing this intentionally? and all under the auspices of greater financial accountability, in fact, even though we have, really, over a decade s worth of Auditor General reports which have highlighted the systemic weaknesses that the Liberals built into the culture of this place, and even though we have a Financial Accountability Officer who has reviewed the finances, the accounting treatments, the unfair hydro plan, and you have the evidence right in front of you. This is the thing with governments: Responsible governments have a responsibility to use the data and the evidence that is before them to establish policy. This is not a stretch goal. This is the job that we have as legislators, to responsibly act with knowledge. Now, the government may not like what the Auditor General has reported with regard to the accounting treatment. The government may not agree entirely with the Financial Accountability Officer, a budgetary officer that we fought to get into this place during the minority government. In fact, I was in on the original hiring policy for that office. The goal of the FAO is to review expenditures but also to look to the future, to examine future projects and to say, you know, This is not necessarily going to work out as the government of the day plans. Now, I am telling you right now, the Financial Accountability Officer had lots of fodder and lots of material with the former Liberal government. But now, this government has decided to hire another level, even though they have evidence before them.

9 26 JUILLET 2018 ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DE L ONTARIO I was reading David Parkinson from the Globe and Mail last week. This actually came out exactly a week ago. He starts off the article by saying: It s ironic that a Premier elected on a pledge of leaner, more cost-effective government would kick off that quest with such a glaring waste of time and money. It goes on to say that the Auditor General and the FAO have already issued official opinions that the previous government s budget has not properly accounted for a couple of key items, so you already have this information before you in those reports. He points out what is very glaring to us on this side of the House: that it s hard not to feel that this is less a serious investigation than a smokescreen. I just want to let you know that we understand what you re trying to do. We understand that you re going to get a tool by this review, and then you re going to start cutting; right? This is without due process. We have a responsibility on this side of the House to ensure that the public services that you have said that you care about that we have the chance in this Legislature to protect those services and to bring those concerns of our respective citizens in our ridings to this place. This is all happening within the context of the fact that the Premier did not have a platform, so there was no costing out. There were slogans like buck-a-beer. I m telling you right now that if you move ahead with reversing the sex ed curriculum, with cancelling cap-and-trade and, therefore, imposing a carbon tax on this province from the federal level, with cancelling the 758 green energy projects most of them are in process or almost completed. The White Pines wind farm was erecting one of those windmills yesterday as we were debating this issue. Decommissioning that project and spending almost the next four years entirely hiring lawyers in the judicial system and fighting contract law in this province is not in the best interests of the people of this province. It really is hard to summarize entirely the level of discontent already that people are feeling with regard to this government. I feel like they are not buying what you are selling, and they very soon will see the impact of poor decisions that this government has made on a whole number of fronts. I think that if you have to put in a motion, as they have right here, that you need to trust the government, that this is your goal, your actions do exactly the opposite. Compromising our economy by disregarding the interests of business and investors who are currently in this province does not build economic confidence. Cancelling and reversing the sex ed curriculum not even keeping it in place while you consult puts children in our province at risk. This cannot be disputed. We are ultimately talking about values. We will continue to hold this government to account, to watch very carefully what they are saying on this side and what they are doing on this side, because right now, this is a government walking in full contradiction of every value that PCs or Conservatives hold up in this province. The Acting Speaker (Ms. Jennifer K. French): Further debate? Mr. Stephen Lecce: I want to just note, Madam Speaker, I ll be sharing my time with the member from Thornhill. I want to, first off, if I may for a second, just say I was very moved to see and stand with New Democrats and members of all parties yesterday at the Danforth vigil. I think it s an important symbol to the city that we stand united at a time of difficulty. So it was good to see many of you. If I may, Madam Speaker, I do want to recognize the former speaker from Scarborough Agincourt and just note the history in this Parliament. He s the first Armenian to be elected in any Legislature in the history of this country. I very much value his thoughtful input in public service. He has done this for many years as a jurist and in many other capacities. So I want to thank the member from Scarborough Agincourt for his leadership here in Parliament. Madam Speaker, I want to comment on the motion before us today. It is so clear that we made a solemn commitment to the people of Ontario to restore hope and accountability in government. We also said we would make life affordable for the people of this province. We are doing that. We ve taken decisive action, immediate action. It s somewhat unprecedented to recall this House. As you know, we ll be sitting for some days longer, to get to work to fulfill the commitments we made to the people of this province. While we may disagree in good faith on the issues before us and the policy prescriptions of how we solve the problems, I do think it is important for any government to make a commitment and to deliver on it. There are many people in this province, perhaps many young people, disillusioned by politics because politicians of any stripe do not fulfill their commitments. I think this undermines the integrity of our democracy and the confidence they have in the institution of democracy. So I am proud to be part of a government that is doing exactly what we said we were going to do, particularly when it comes to creating an opportunity in society for the next generation. We ve put forth a strong, credible plan under the last bill, Bill 2, the Urgent Priorities Act, that is obviously taking action in three ways that I think are important. The fact that we are sitting longer, the fact that we remain in this House, the fact that we have signalled to the people that the work continues and that we re going to continue to roll up our sleeves, is another indication to the people of this province that there s more work to do to better their lives and to put more money in their pockets. We believe in an enterprise society where people who work hard and those who want to pursue the dream of the dignity of work should be able to do that unimpeded by government. Madam Speaker, in the most recent legislation that has passed and as of this morning, I understand that it received royal assent we know that the acts we re taking will help us reduce hydro rates for working people. There

10 362 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO 26 JULY 2018 are so many people in every single region of this province it s not just germane to the people of King Vaughan; it is in every region. It is in Waterloo. It is in Scarborough. It is in Kenora. It is everywhere, where working people feel the struggle and the pinch of higher taxes and of course the higher hydro rates that are imposed on them. We know, in all of our ridings, that this phenomenon should not continue, that this is an unacceptable reality for too many people, particularly our seniors, the people who have spent an entire life to help build this country. Yet, in their latter years of life, they have to choose between it s often remarked on, but I don t believe it s a talking point. I have met many people in my riding wonderful Italian speakers; little nonnas who tell me they came to this country in the 1950s or 1960s and worked very hard in the apprenticeship of being a Canadian. They raised their family, helped their kids get ahead, and now at 70 or 80 years old, they can t even make the choice of putting food on their table. Many of the seniors in my riding have to actually consider selling their homes simply to get by. Again, I do think this is an unacceptable reality in 2018, in the greatest country in the world, in one of the most prosperous countries in world. This is unacceptable. We came to government with a mandate to help change that trajectory, to put more money back in the pockets of working people and to give seniors the respect they deserve in the latter years of their life. We also made a commitment to end the waste the wasteful contracts, the bad energy contracts that have manifested in government and the Ministry of Energy for too many years. The former government was rather content with signing these contracts at any cost ideologically driven no matter what, even if it meant higher costs for the ratepayers of Ontario. Madam Speaker, obviously the people of Ontario have questioned the judgment of the former government and resolutely decided that that approach should not continue. We have taken a different approach, one that is really rooted in a belief that we must get our energy system back on track and make it affordable, sustainable, and ultimately allow people in Ontario as well as small business to be able to live and sustain themselves So we ve taken action. In one signature of a pen, the Minister of Energy just last week signed an order that will in effect save over $700 million for the taxpayers of this province over the years of those contracts. I think that is leadership. I think that is another example of the minister and the government taking action to save people money, and it is very much congruent with the campaign commitments we made. This goes back to an earlier point about promises made, promises kept: It should not be a slogan. This should be the way governments operate at all levels for all parties. In some respects Mrs. Robin Martin: Hear, hear. Mr. Stephen Lecce: Thank you to the member from Eglinton Lawrence for her enthusiasm this morning. In some respects, we re being mocked for invoking a phrase that positions the people of this province at the very centre of what government is. That is precisely what democracy was predicated on: service to people. We will not apologize for making that the central mantra of our government. We will not apologize for ensuring that people in this province, particularly those who felt disillusioned by big, bloated, ineffective government, finally, after 15 long years, know that we will work hard for them each and every day in the service of the people in every region of this province. Madam Speaker, we also made a commitment, as you know, to bring new leadership to the board of Hydro One. We made it clear that that was our objective perhaps a lofty goal. I mean, I must admit, the fact that it was done so quickly honest to God, it s just incredible that that was achieved. I must give the cabinet Interjection. Mr. Stephen Lecce: To the member from Waterloo Ms. Catherine Fife: I d like to see the deal. I d like to see it. Mr. Stephen Lecce: To the member from Waterloo: We took immediate action. We took immediate action to do this. People said we couldn t get it done. Under the leadership of this Premier, the Minister of Energy and cabinet, they were able to bring new leadership with not a single dollar of severance paid. That is, in itself, a success for the people, for the taxpayer and for those who want government to be on their side. I know that this success perhaps irks other members of this House, but honestly, when government does something in the public interest I had a wonderful interview on TVO about the rookies of Parliament, and I said that I would acknowledge when a good idea comes before this Parliament. When any party does something right, I am prepared in my own conscience to stand up and say that is a good idea. When government actually fulfills a commitment of new leadership not a single dollar of severance. Look, I get it. We just finished an election, and maybe we re still in that spirit. I certainly am in some respects, Madam Speaker, as you ve seen in recent days. But could we acknowledge success when it is achieved, when taxpayers are better off? I would submit we should. We also made a commitment and it s something that I know will perhaps divide me and the members opposite to put students first. I appreciate that the members opposite were ill prepared to put the interests of 45,000 young people first. What we have done, after the longest strike in the history of this country, the longest strike in post-secondary history this is nothing to celebrate, by the way. Obviously, many students in my riding have been very affected by this strike over 100 days. It is just wrong. So we as a government and as a Parliament need to make sure that the focus of young people making sure that they are

11 26 JUILLET 2018 ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DE L ONTARIO 363 enabled to achieve their full, God-given potential should be at the centre of what we do. Of course, there are two political parties, or certainly one, that are ill prepared to make that commitment to the next generation. But it is this government and this Premier who made a solemn commitment to get our young people back to school. We recalled the Legislature with that mandate, and yesterday I am proud to reaffirm and report, if I may, that the students of York University will be back in the classroom this September. We obviously recognize there s more to do, and this motion, I think, intimates and indicates to the people of Ontario that there s more to do. Yes, we have achieved incremental successes for taxpayers, for young people, for all Ontarians, but we recognize, I recognize, there s more to do. I didn t come here to have a good time; I came here to serve people. I came here to work for the people, if I may reaffirm, because this is very much at the centre of why I m here. There s more to do, particularly in health care. Recently, I was fortunate to grab a bite with the member from Brampton South, who is in this House today a great, capable member and parliamentary assistant. Talk about leadership from Brampton: He indicated to me the need to take decisive action on hallway health care at Brampton Civic, an issue that I know he cares deeply about and an issue that our government cares deeply about. Mackenzie Health in Richmond Hill, in Vaughan: The member from Richmond Hill will certainly echo these points, that we need to have more front-line investments to help reduce the wait times that are so brutal in hospitals today. So we re going to be taking action in this respect. We re going to be taking action. As the member from Waterloo said earlier a prolific heckler of mine, I will say. She talked about creating an advantage Ms. Catherine Fife: That s not fair. I m being good. Mr. Stephen Lecce: You re very effective. That s a compliment to the member from Waterloo. But I will say that she spoke about the importance of her region. I ll be going to visit Google in Kitchener- Waterloo in the coming weeks to understand how we can enable our tech and our innovators in that region of Ontario to continue to succeed. I will submit to the member and, through you, Madam Speaker, I will submit to all members that the way we achieve that is by ensuring that those small business, those innovators who are pioneering in research and development in this country, have the tools to succeed, that we give them a competitive advantage. In our own judgment, we must acknowledge that the imposition of higher taxes and regulations on private enterprise is actually not the way to incentivize business to grow in Kitchener-Waterloo; it is exactly the opposite. If we want to ensure that more innovation happens in this province a more productive society where businesses can grow and prosper we re not going to do that by sitting idle with a carbon tax being imposed by the federal government no. We are going to stand up every single day against the interests of a federal government that is going outside their jurisdiction by imposing a regressive, punitive carbon tax on, yes, innovators in Kitchener- Waterloo, on exporters in Vaughan and on businesses across the province. We must take continued action in this respect. Madam Speaker, I m going to turn it over to the member from Thornhill. But I do want you to know that this motion is, if I may summarize, a clear indication to the people that we will continue to work very hard every single day in the pursuit of creating a society where businesses can grow and compete. I hope all members will consider the leadership that this Premier has shown and consider the bills, the legislation, that we are going to put forth in the coming days and weeks to get our province back on track. The Acting Speaker (Ms. Jennifer K. French): Further debate? I recognize the member from Thornhill. Mrs. Gila Martow: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. It s wonderful to see you in the chair today. We re debating a motion today: That, in the opinion of this House, the current government is a government for the people with a clear mandate to pursue policies that put more money in people s pockets; create and protect jobs; address the hydro crisis; reduce hospital wait times; and restore accountability and trust in government. I have to say that when I m reading this motion out, I am reminded of something that was posted yesterday on Twitter by Warren Kinsella, who is a political consultant. I think a lot of us inside and outside of this room know him quite well. What he said was, No one can accuse this guy speaking of Doug Ford of slacking off. I ve never seen anything like this. I think this motion speaks to that, because we ve really hit the ground running. We ve recalled the Legislature during the summer recess. What Mr. Kinsella was responding to was the fact that Doug Ford had announced in a statement that the Legislature is going to continue to sit for at least another two to three weeks. What we re trying to do is not just to work on our campaign promises. It s not just about promises made and promises kept. It s about ensuring that future generations in Ontario have the same opportunities that all of us felt when we were growing up. When we ve been talking about back-to-work legislation and the member from King Vaughan was correct: our focus was on the students. I think that we on this side of the House were really able to really focus on what the students have been going through the longest strike in Canadian history in a post-secondary institution. We were trying to imagine what we went through. Most of us did go to college and university; fortunately, we had the opportunity We imagined what those students were feeling a fivemonth strike what the students who are entering York University in September, or planning to enter, what they were feeling when the strike was still ongoing. Should they withdraw? Should they have applied to another program? Should they look for a job? We really, I think, emotionally were able to connect with those students. I m

12 364 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO 26 JULY 2018 glad that we passed that legislation yesterday, and I m glad that those students are going to have the opportunities that they should have, the opportunities that most of us here in the House had. It s about affordability, accountability, about returning trust. It s not just about the issues of the day; it s not just about the problems we re always going to be facing. Unfortunately, we know that there are going to be new problems that we can t even predict. We re going to deal with those problems. But we want to deal with it in an atmosphere where the public feels that they re consulted, the public feels that they can trust all of us to work together to do what s best for everybody not just what s best for an employer, not just what s best for an employee, not just what s best for students or just best for the professors or the Tas. It s about considering and balancing the needs of everybody in Ontario. Yes, we re concerned about the environment. Yes, we re concerned about having clean air and clean water for ourselves, for our children, for our grandchildren and our neighbours. But we need to do it in an atmosphere where the economy is robust. We need a robust economy in order to end hallway medicine, in order to fund our universities and colleges and training programs. I think that a lot of us here are feeling the energy in the room. We have a lot of new members, partly because we grew the Legislature and we had some new ridings and partly because we had a big change. But the young members that we have here, the energy that they re showing all of us to get to work no grumblings; everybody is working hard. It s hard to recall the Legislature. I want to remind everybody at home that it s not easy to recall the Legislature. A lot of people do not have their offices set up, do not have their staff set up. They don t have a printer. We re sharing printers and we re all managing. It s a real collaborative effort here in the Legislature. We know it s hot outside, and sometimes it gets a little hot in here, even with the air conditioning, but we re focusing on our campaign promises just to touch on a few to deal with the growing debt. We just can t be continuing to spend over $1 billion a month on interest payments on the debt. It just cannot continue. We all know that interest rates could rise and probably will rise. We want to reduce the corporate tax rate from 11.5% to 10.5% and, as well, reduce the tax rate for small businesses. We want to take 10 cents a litre off of gasoline, and we re already working towards that. We wanted to take another 12% off of people s hydro electricity rates, even added to the 25% the previous government promised. The focus here isn t just about subsidizing collecting taxes from businesses and individuals in order to subsidize electricity rates. That s not the kind of lowering that we want on this side of the House. The kind of lowering we want is decision-making that actually causes the root cost to go down so that people s electricity rates go down. We already saw and it was, I think, an important message to the people of Ontario that we managed to so quickly have the board resign at Hydro One. The CEO stepped down with zero severance. It s a message. It s a message that we are not going to put up with wasting taxpayer dollars and that we are going to create an atmosphere that s fair to everybody in the province of Ontario. We re going to create long-term-care beds. We have to end hallway medicine, and one of the ways that we can achieve that is by having long-term-care beds, and perhaps having more hospice beds as well. We want to deal with the autism file and ensure that every student in Ontario, if they need therapy, they are getting the therapy. I look forward to many more comments and I appreciate this opportunity to rise and speak on this important motion. The Acting Speaker (Ms. Jennifer K. French): Further debate. I recognize the member from Nickel Belt. M me France Gélinas: Thank you so much, Speaker. It is a great honour to see you in the chair. I think you were meant to do this job, and I know that you will do an excellent job as a Speaker of this assembly. I would like to put a few comments on the record regarding this motion that was tabled. The motion talks about the priority to create and protect jobs, to address the hydro crisis and to reduce hospital wait times. I will speak about all three of those priorities that are put forward. I represent the riding of Nickel Belt. When you hear about Sudbury and nickel and you think about the mines, well, all of the mines are in my riding. There are many of them and, I m hoping, many more to come. But I must tell you that although the mining industry is an important economic driver for all of Ontario, they are worried, Speaker. They are worried because of all of the uncertainty that this new government has brought forward. When you scrap things that s the language that they use without replacing it with a thoughtful replacement, it leaves business with instability. Business needs to plan for a long period of time. They need certainty to be able to be successful. I will put into the record a letter that I ve received. They re called Sudbury Integrated Nickel Operations, better known as Glencore. They are the second-largest mining company in the Sudbury area. They basically wrote to me because they are worried, Speaker. They are worried. They have plans to spend close to $1.2 billion in my riding. They have announced that this will be done through an investment of US$720 million they always deal in US, for reasons unknown in Onaping Depth. Onaping is a part of my riding that already has a mine. They have technology now that allows them to go way deeper to get the minerals, but that requires an investment, an investment of $720 million that they are willing to do, which will secure a mining future for our operation well beyond 2021, because this is one of the mines that we thought was coming to the end of its useful life. They are also planning to invest US$140 million to complete what is called the Process Gas Project at their smelter, to reduce SO 2 emissions. This is on top of the US$180 million that they ve already invested into this project.